December 29, 2000
Organic, Schmorganic - "Organic foods are now an official, 'USDA-approved' scam. The U.S. Department of Agriculture just issued regulations defining what foods may be labeled 'organic.' Fruits, vegetables and meat and dairy products produced without the use of pesticides, irradiation, genetic engineering, growth hormones, or sewage sludge may carry the 'USDA Organic' seal as early as next summer." (Steve Milloy, FoxNews.com -- available Friday a.m. EST)
"Vodafone sued over brain cancer" - "British mobile phone suppliers are facing a billion-dollar legal action brought by US brain tumour victims." (The Times) | Reuters Health
Peter Angelos apparently doesn't follow the medical journals.
"Smoking 'triples skin cancer risk'" - "Smoking greatly increases the risk of developing a particular type of skin cancer, researchers have found. Squamous Cell Carcinoma is already one of the more common skin cancers, normally developing later in life." (BBC)
Some other statistical studies that have examined the association between smoking and squamous cell skin cancer, include:
- "This epidemiological study strongly indicates that sun protection is the major modality to reduce sun-induced cutaneous tumors in Japanese." [From Araki K; Nagano T; Ueda M; Washio F; Watanabe S; Yamaguchi N; Ichihashi M. Incidence of skin cancers and precancerous lesions in Japanese--risk factors and prevention. J Epidemiol 1999 Dec;9(6 Suppl):S14-21.]
- "The relatively weak effect of individual factors supports the view of a multifactorial disease and suggests that interactions between UV exposure and genetic predisposition may be more significant determinants of risk." [From Lear JT; Tan BB; Smith AG; Jones PW; Heagerty AH; Strange RC; Fryer AA. A comparison of risk factors for malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma in the UK. Int J Clin Pract 1998 Apr-May;52(3):145-9.]
- "..current cigarette smokers showed a 50% increase in the risk of squamous cell carcinoma compared with never smokers (relative risk = 1.5; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-2.1). CONCLUSION: Exposure to the sun leading to sunburn, particularly at early ages, should be avoided to decrease the risk of incident SCC." [From Grodstein F; Speizer FE; Hunter DJ. A prospective study of incident squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in the nurses' health study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995 Jul 19;87(14):1061-6.]
- "Smoking and alcohol consumption showed no statistically significant association with the risk of nonmelanocytic skin cancer." [From Kune GA; Bannerman S; Field B; Watson LF; Cleland H; Merenstein D; Vitetta L. Diet, alcohol, smoking, serum beta-carotene, and vitamin A in male nonmelanocytic skin cancer patients and controls. Nutr Cancer 1992;18(3):237-44.]
- "No association was noted on our study between a history of psoriasis and development of SCC. Neither was an association between smoking and SCC found." [From Hogan DJ; Lane PR; Gran L; Wong D. Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in Saskatchewan, Canada. J Dermatol Sci 1990 Mar;1(2):97-101.]
"For women, night work may up breast cancer risk" - "Women who work at night, such as nurses or flight attendants, may be slightly more likely to develop breast cancer than women who work in the daytime, a Danish researcher reports." (Reuters Health)
Reviews of studies that examined the melatonin suppression/breast cancer link report:
- "In all, there have been eleven occupational studies related to breast cancer in women, and statistically significant risk ratios have been observed: 1.98 for pre-menopausal women in occupations with high EMF exposure in one study, 2.17 in all women who worked as telephone installers, repairers, and line workers in another study, and 1.65 for system analysts/ programmers, 1.40 for telegraph and radio operators, and 1.27 for telephone operators in a third study. However, six of the studies did not find any significant effects and two found effects only in subgroups. The results of the eight studies of residential exposure and four electric blanket studies have been inconsistent, with most not demonstrating any significant association." [From Caplan LS; Schoenfeld ER; O'Leary ES; Leske MC. Breast cancer and electromagnetic fields--a review. Ann Epidemiol 2000 Jan;10(1):31-44.]
- "Based on the published data, it is currently unclear if EMF and electric light exposure are significant risk factors for breast cancer." [From Brainard GC; Kavet R; Kheifets LI. The relationship between electromagnetic field and light exposures to melatonin and breast cancer risk: a review of the relevant literature. J Pineal Res 1999 Mar;26(2):65-100.]
"Thailand bans European beef over mad cow scare" - "Thailand's government has imposed a ban on imports of beef from seven European nations in order to prevent the spread of mad cow disease." (AP)
"Cancer deaths decline, says UAB " - "A new study of cancer death rates shows that this nation's decades-long "cancer epidemic" has been caused by one disease - lung cancer. The study by two UAB scientists raises compelling questions about winning the war on cancer, assessing the toll of cigarette smoking and overestimating the cancer threat of environmental pollution." (Birmingham News)
"Veterans Affairs Proposes Additional Aid for 'Atomic Veterans'" - "Veterans exposed to radiation during their military service and diagnosed with cancer of the bone, brain, colon, lung, or ovary will have an easier time applying for, and receiving compensation for their illnesses, if proposed regulatory changes are approved." (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs media release)
Contrary to this request, the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine reported in October 1999,
By beginning with the most complete lists of [atomic veterans] to date, identifying a comparable group of servicemen who did not participate in nuclear bomb blasts, and tracking death certificates through various sources, the researchers were able to draw this general conclusion: There is no difference between the two groups in overall death rates or in total deaths from cancer.
The researchers also investigated specific causes of death. When looking at leukemia, participants in the nuclear tests had a 14 percent higher death rate than those in the comparison group. But the study report points out that this difference is not statistically significant, meaning that the results may be due to chance.
Because leukemia was originally singled out as a primary target for investigation, the researchers also looked at subcategories of participants. For example, land-based participants -- those in the Nevada desert -- had a death rate from leukemia that was 50 percent higher than military personnel in similar units who did not take part in atomic tests. Sea-based test participants in the South Pacific, however, did not differ from their comparison group in leukemia deaths.
The leukemia findings are consistent with those of other studies of atomic test participants, the study group said. That is, the handful of other studies conducted have found slightly increased rates of leukemia.
The study report also points out some unanticipated results regarding two other kinds of cancer -- prostate and nasal. Deaths from prostate cancer were 20 percent higher among test participants than the comparison group, and even higher for nasal cancer. The prostate cancer findings have not been consistently seen in other studies of people exposed to radiation and are therefore difficult to interpret. The nasal cancer finding is even harder to interpret, in part because this is the first study of atomic test participants to look specifically for that cause of death. To date, nasal
cancer has not been among the cancers considered to be caused by radiation.
December 27, 2000
National Anxiety Center: "The Most Dubious News Stories of the Year" - "We began the year 2000 having been told that every computer in the world would crash. We ended the year waiting a month past the national election to find out that George W. Bush was our President, thanks to the outdated technology of how we cast a vote."
"Meat 'bad for bone health'" - "Elderly women who get too much protein from animal products risk fractures and bone loss, researchers warn." (BBC)
"Clean Air Trust: Voters Want Tougher Clean Air Standards, Enforcement, Dirty Power Plant Cleanup; Survey Puts Spotlight on Sen. Bob Smith's Next Moves " - "On the eve of the 30th anniversary of the Clean Air Act, post-election national and statewide New Hampshire surveys show that voters overwhelmingly want tougher clean air health standards based on new science rather than economics. Voters also want stricter enforcement of the law." (Clean Air Trust media release)
"Salmonella found to be resistant to drug" - "Salmonella bacteria resistant to the standard drug used to treat serious forms of the infection in children are emerging nationwide, government health experts warn." (AP)
"Mosquito pesticide takes toll on birds" - "Thousands of birds are dropping dead in Florida, and conservation groups are citing fenthion, a pesticide used to control mosquitoes, as the cause." (ENN)
"In France they are still counting the cost of nature and man-made errors " - "After a year of unusual weather in France and Europe as a whole -- a cool summer followed by an interminably mild and damp autumn -- it is tempting to blame the great storms of 1999 on global warming and the disruption of traditional weather patterns, but officials at France-Meteo are cautious. 'One freak storm proves nothing,' one said, 'though it is true that last autumn was also unusually wet and mild. This partly explains why so many trees were lost. The ground in many places was exceptionally soft and damp.'" (The Independent)
"After a year of weird weather we can expect only one forecast: there's a lot more to come" - "After 12 months of remarkable climatic ups and downs, with the sunniest winter and the wettest autumn on record and the third great storm in 13 years, our weather is likely to get more volatile still, according to Peter Ewins, chief executive of the Met Office." (The Independent)
"Salmon puzzle: Why did males turn female?" - "As the first report of environmental gender bending in wild Pacific salmon, 'this is an extremely important paper,' notes Don Campton, a regional fish geneticist with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in Longview, Wash. Further studies are needed to confirm the result and find out whether it represents a one-season fluke. Nevertheless, he worries it may also signal risks facing other fisheries." (Science News)
"Organic Food Standards May Violate First Amendment " - "New standards for organic foods may violate First Amendment free speech rights, the Competitive Enterprise Institute said today. 'USDA’s organic rule attempts to create a single, nationwide standard for a concept that means different things to different people,' said CEI director of food safety policy Gregory Conko. 'These rules raise serious First Amendment problems. Not only do they prohibit producers from using standards that are less strict than USDA’s; they also prohibit standards that are more strict.'" (CEI media release)
December 26, 2000
"Biotech's allergy benefits" - "The furor over StarLink corn is all a tempest in a taco shell." (Mike Fumento, Wash. Times)
"A Cleanup for the Big Rigs" - "...The administration also argued that the public health benefits -- including reduced rates of cancer, asthma and other diseases -- would outweigh the projected costs." (New York Times editorial)
"How about an FDA warning label?" - "It seems that every year we have about 2.2 cases of salmonella per 100,000 people. This is not what you would call epidemic proportions. However, we are experiencing an epidemic of warning labels." (Dick Boland, Washington Times)
"UN Health Agency Sees Global Mad Cow Risk" - "The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday expressed concern about what it called "exposure worldwide" to mad cow disease and its fatal human form, new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD)." (Reuters)
"UN Urges Extra Vigilance on Malaria in Africa" - "The World Health Organization (WHO) on Thursday warned holidaymakers heading for Africa to "take all possible precautions" against malaria, including the use of drugs and insect repellents." (Reuters)
"Smoking damages health early in life" - "Even healthy young adults may suffer negative health consequences due to smoking. Smokers in their 20s and 30s were much more likely to miss work or be admitted to a hospital in the short-term than nonsmokers, researchers report." (ReutersHealth.com)
"Staring ahead 'raises crash risk'" - "Staring intently at the road may actually increase the chances of having a crash on long repetitive stretches, say experts." (BBC) | Media release
"Chocolate 'protects the heart'" - "Scientists find more evidence that chocolate may help to protect against heart disease." (BBC)
"'Obesity a world-wide hazard'" - "A top nutrition expert warns that obesity is threatening the health of a growing number of people world-wide." (BBC)
"Australian beef free of mad cow disease: meat industry" - "Consumers are being reassured that Australian beef is free of BSE, or mad cow disease." (ABC)
"Cigarette pack pictures to shock smokers into health awareness" - "In an attempt to shock smokers into greater awareness of health hazards, cigarette packs on sale in Canada are to carry not only written warnings but also vivid illustrations." (ABC)
"OSHA Lists Highlights of Three Decades; Meeting the Mandate: Saving Lives, Preventing Injury, Preserving Health" - "At the beginning of its
fourth decade, OSHA is meeting its mandate to see that workers go home whole and healthy. Since President Richard M. Nixon signed the Occupational Safety and Health Act on Dec. 29, 1970, work-related fatalities are down 50 percent and occupational injuries have declined by 40 percent." (OSHA Media release)
"'Ground Zero' for climate change" - "Rising global temperatures may change the face of Florida in the coming decades, with some experts predicting that much of low-lying South Florida could be underwater in the next 100 years." (Miami Herald)
"EPA research division concerned about harmful human testing" - "Deliberate human exposure to pollutants was an element of nine of the 110 projects approved last fiscal year by the National Center for Environmental Research, a division of the Environmental Protection Agency. Human testing has also been involved in studying the effects of a bacterium in causing diarrhea, and investigating whether certain doses of a water pollutant are harmful to humans." (AP)
Human testing is OK for air pollution, but not for pesticides?
"Environmental activists sticker SUVs" - "For four months, it's been hunting season for two mischievous middle-aged men in the Bay Area. Their prey is the far-from-elusive sport utility vehicle. They wield a bent toward civil disobedience and some strong glue. Robert Lind, who runs a deer-repellent business, and cohort Charles Dines, a construction worker, have
scampered all over the region to smooth homemade bumper stickers onto hundreds of SUVs - the vehicles they love to hate." (AP)
"Japan bans European beef imports" - "Japan has decided to impose a total ban on beef imports from the European Union in a move to keep out mad cow disease, an agriculture ministry official said Monday." (AP)
"Germany to test sheep for mad cow disease" - "The head of Germany's disease control agency has called for tests of the nation's sheep for variants of mad cow disease." (AP)
"Blacks dying younger" - "The life expectancy of Aborigines has fallen in at least three states -- despite the nation's record run of economic growth in the 1990s and billions of dollars in government assistance." (The Australian)
But Robert Carruthers responds:
The study refers to unpublished and, therefore, questionable data.
It only mentions certain sub populations of the indigenous community in these "States" as having got worse - men in Western Australia and women in South Australia plus the Northern Territory. Presumably women in WA and men in SA and the NT have do not have reduced life expectancy.
The reference to The Economist -- "Australia is the only nation in the developed world to have a section of its population facing a shrinking life expectancy" -- is meaningless in the context in which it is used. The Economist article talks about the average age of countries' populations, not of all sub-populations within countries ("Tales of youth and age," www.economist.com).
December 20, 2000
"Handheld
cellular telephone use not associated with risk of brain cancer"
- "CHICAGO -- The use of handheld cellular telephones does not appear to
be associated with the risk of brain cancer, but further studies are needed to
account for longer induction periods, especially for slow-growing tumors,
according to an article in the December 20 issue of The Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA)." (AHF)
"Landmark
school-based 'social influences' smoking-prevention program found not to
work" - "SEATTLE - The most ambitious, school-based
smoking-prevention study of its kind has found that teaching youth how to
identify and resist social influences to smoke - the main focus of
smoking-prevention education and research for more than two decades - simply
doesn't work." (FHCRC) [Failure
of anti-smoking plan leaves researchers baffled (AP)]
"Drinking
and smoking views under fire" - "MOST Australians believe
regular consumption of alcohol and tobacco smoking is okay, while few approve
of regular illicit drug taking, a new study has found. An Australian Institute
of Health and Welfare report says 60 per cent of adults approve of regular
drinking of alcohol, and about 40 per cent approve of regular tobacco
smoking." (news.com.au)
"Scientists
sceptical of Phillips’ BSE theories" - "SCIENTISTS
at Moredun animal diseases research centre yesterday rejected, some more
robustly than others, the Phillips’ inquiry conclusion that BSE was the
result of a prion protein mutation in cattle in the 1970s." (The
Scotsman) [Mad
About Sheep (New Scientist)]
"Voodoo
medicine lives!" - "Just a few days ago, Dr. Patricia
Marchuk saw a new mother who had brought in her three-month-old baby for a
routine checkup. The baby was already late for her first set of shots.
"I'm not going to give them to her," proclaimed the mom. "I'm
terrified of them." She had it on good authority that immunizations are
dangerous, and can cause crib death, allergies, asthma, even autism and
juvenile delinquency." (GAM)
"The
myth-buster" - "A Seattle comedian, mocking a rival
station's alarmist consumer reports, made up a typical headline: "What
you don't know about gravy can kill you." This got a big laugh,
but the (unintentionally) funny thing is that many in his audience were
probably thinking: "Gravy, huh?" Ever since the World Health
Organization announced in the 1970s that most cancers were due to
environmental causes, everything in our environment has been seen as a
threat." (REPORT)
"Don't
shoot the analysts" - "Maybe it's the holiday season, but we
seem to be fielding an inordinate quantity of off-the-wall material. Over the
weekend, for example, the vice-president of research at the University of
Waterloo, lamenting an alleged shortage of basic research in Canada, came up
with the darndest warning: "We could simply run out of ideas."
(Terence Corcoran, National Post)
Paul Ehrlich - still wrong: "The
bomb's still ticking" - "Paul Ehrlich wants to know whether
anyone has brought sawdust to soak up the blood that might be spilt this sunny
afternoon in Richmond at the biennial conference of the Australian Population
Association. The Stanford University professor, who more than 30 years ago was
shot to Nostradamus-like prominence when he predicted everything but the end
of the world - ''The battle to feed all of humanity is over . . . hundreds of
millions of people are going to starve to death,'' he boomed in his famous
tome, The Population Bomb - is about to tell a bunch of the Australian
demographers that their country, indeed their planet, is well on the way to
environmental, ecological, terrestrial, epidemiological ruin." (The Age)
"One-Child
Policy Doesn't Stop China's Population Growth" - "According
to the Associated Press, China hopes to cap its population at 1.6 billion by
mid-century by persuading women to have fewer children and bear them later in
life, a government policy paper said Tuesday. China's one-child policy has
already slowed growth of the population, currently the world's largest at 1.26
billion and growing by 10 million a year, according to the paper. "If we
relax our work in this regard, it is highly possible that this work will be
undone," said Zhang Weiqing, director of the State Family Planning
Commission. In "Defusing
the Population Bomb," Stephen Moore shows how an increased population
has not led to the doomsday scenarios predicted in the 60's and 70's and how
quality of life is continually improving." (Cato Institute)
"Survey
finds Indian fertility rate declining" - "MUMBAI: In what
would sound music to family planning officials in a year when the population
crossed the one billion mark in May, the latest national family health survey
says fertility rate among Indians is declining." (Times of India)
"World
Use Of Genetically Modified Crops Up 11% In 2000" -
"MANILA-- The total global area tilled with genetically modified crops
hit 44.2 million hectares in 2000, up 11% from 39.9 million hectares in 1999,
the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications
said Tuesday. The ISAA is an independent international agency that monitors
the global use of biotech crops." (DJN)
"US
exports not hurt by StarLink incidents-embassies" -
"WASHINGTON, Dec 19 - Japanese and South Korean diplomats said on Tuesday
the discovery of StarLink bio-corn in cargoes destined for their countries`
food and animal feed supply would not impact future U.S. corn exports. Two
separate U.S. corn shipments destined for Japan`s food supply and South
Korea`s animal feed industry were found on Tuesday to be tainted with the
genetically-altered StarLink corn." (Reuters)
"Tests
to block blight of GE seed imports" - "Border checks will be
in place by March to test for genetically engineered material in imported seed
shipments. Until now there has been no compulsory testing of imported seeds
for GE contamination. The New Zealand move comes at a time when there are no
international standards for quality assurance or border tests." (NZ
Herald)
"BIO:
U.S./EU Biotech Report Contains Positive Consensus" -
"This morning, the EU/U.S. Biotech Consultative Forum report on
biotechnology was released. In the report, biotech experts said the U.S.
government should tighten control of biotech crops and food by establishing
“content-based’ labeling." (AgWeb.com)
"EU
says GMO "ban" to stay until at least mid-2001" -
"BRUSSELS - The European Union will not lift an effective ban on new
genetically modified organisms (GMOs) until well into next year at the
earliest, Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstrom said on Tuesday."
(Reuters)
"European
Perception of Biotech Foods Skewed by 15 Years of Food and Medical Technology
Scares" - "There's a new French paradox when it comes to
dining today, but it is not related to wine consumption. Though a product of
biotechnology, wine pales by comparison to the products of modern
biotechnology in terms of paradoxical views on behalf of French and other
European consumers. Wine is also unequivocally accepted. Pierre Deloffre,
general manager of Bonduelle, a French fruit and vegetable product
manufacturer, discussed what he called "a confused and irrational
story" about biotech foods in Europe at the American Seed Trade
Association's (ASTA's) Corn & Sorghum Seed Research Conference in Chicago
on Dec. 8." (ASTA)
"U.N.
Agency: World Still Gripped by Warming Trend" - "GENEVA -
The warming trend that has gripped our climate for the past 20 years will make
2000 one of the hottest years since 1860, despite La Nina's cooling effect on
the tropical Pacific and other anomalies, the United Nations weather agency
said Tuesday." (Reuters) [AP]
One of myriad "It's really hot" releases
currently proliferating. Using a rather dubious near-surface daily
temperature amalgam, WMO is citing 2000 as being roughly +0.3°C above the
1961-1990 average. What does this mean? Here's
the long-term graph of the contiguous US meteorological station composite,
probably the best financed and most accurately maintained set in the world.
The zero line is the 1961-1990 average and the red worm track is the 5-year
running mean. Obviously, "the warming trend that has gripped our
climate for the past 20 years" assumes much less importance when you
can see that it is merely a recovery from the cooling subsequent to 1930
(always assuming that the warming is real and not an artefact of data
corruption). The Goddard/CRU
global temperature amalgam appears rather different from the US,
suggesting a pronounced contemporary warming. There is an increasing
divergence between surface amalgam sets and atmospheric temperatures
measured by balloon and satellite. The satellite-measured tropospheric
mean shows 2000 has been mostly cooler than the 1961-1990 mean.
Some of the coverage being given this release is quite
extraordinary. In The Guardian - "Extremes
included the first thunderstorm ever recorded on the northern tip of
Alaska..." Hmm... maybe but in the Journals
of Captain Franklin "... They reached the mouth of the
Mackenzie on 30 August in a violent gale with thunder, lightning and
torrents of rain." This was in 1826 and the mouth of the
Mackenzie is about the same latitude, roughly 20° east of Alaska's Point
Barrow - perhaps high latitude thunderstorms are not quite so novel after
all.
To return to the original lead, how can a warming
atmosphere warm the planet when the atmosphere is not warming? While it may
be ideologically desirable for some to insist that the atmosphere must
be warming because the surface amalgam proves warming is occurring,
this is an exercise in circular reasoning. Given that two diverse and
mutually verifying methods show that atmospheric warming is not actually
occurring as computer game oracles insist, the suspect must then become the
measurement technique which is out of step with the other two - especially
when it is known that this third technique is plagued by significant
interference from urban heat island effect, closure of rural recording
points, very limited sampling of the Earth's surface and quite extraordinary
variance in data quality. Has there been any net warming since the 1930s?
That seems very doubtful.
"VIRTUAL
CLIMATE ALERT #44" - "One month and four Virtual Climate
Alerts ago, we were dismayed that the National Climate Data Center’s by
now predictable annual announcement of "the hottest year on record"
(often made before a full year’s data is available) jumped the gun at
October’s end and proclaimed the first ten months of 2000 to be the
warmest since record-keeping began. It was projected that if the trend
continues, 2000 would become the hottest year on record. November’s data
is in. Were this an AAAU track meet, we’d see NCDC climatologists waddling
back to the starting line, blushing ear-to-ear at their over-eagerness.
Preliminary data from NCDC reveals November 2000 to be the second-coldest
November on record." (GES)
"UPS AND
DOWNS MARK YEAR IN WEATHER FOR 2000, NOAA SAYS FORECASTERS UPDATE WINTER
2000-01 OUTLOOK" - "December 19, 2000 — The year began
with a record warm winter, but 2000 is ending with a record cold winter and a
legacy of topsy-turvy weather events during the months in between, including a
deadly F-4 tornado in Alabama over the weekend. At a news conference today in
Washington, D. C., NOAA officials said the
recent blast of cold air that broke several records last week is a preview of
what the nation can expect for the rest of the winter. "Generally, while
we experienced above-average temperatures in 2000, colder-than-normal
temperatures emerged later, especially during November," said NOAA
Administrator D. James Baker, adding that November was the second coldest on
record." (NOAA)
Sigh... "Sahara
jumps Mediterranean into Europe" - "Global warming threatens
to create dust belt around the globe" (Guardian)
A few months ago, the same areas cited as drying were
the fault of excessive water diversion and groundwater extraction to
support huge numbers of Mediterranean tourist resorts in traditionally
desert or near-desert regions (valued for the purpose by virtue of their
consistently fine and warm weather conditions). Same 'problem' now seconded
to support the global warming scare.
"Sweden
makes climate deal top priority" - "BRUSSELS, Belgium --
Sweden is to make the signing of a global deal on greenhouse gas emissions a
priority during its presidency of the European Union." (CNN)
"Pew
report: Warming trend could wipe out familiar U.S. species" -
"Planetary climate warming induced by human activities will cause
ecological havoc in the United States, as plants and animals migrate in a
desperate search of new habitats where they can survive, according to a new
study." (CNN)
I was told the other day that PCGCC does not
stand for Pew Center for Generating Climate Claptrap - if the
hat fits...
"Man-made
fires can worsen drought in Africa" - "SAN FRANCISCO,
California -- Fires made by humans for cooking and other reasons in the
African tropics slow down rainfall and can contribute to drought on the
continent, according to a new report. Scientists studying the world's tropical
rainfall determined that a storm over a populated area in Africa may generate
only half the rain as the same kind of storm over the ocean. A main reason is
smoke pollution, according to lead scientist Daniel Rosenfeld, a professor of
meteorology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem." (CNN) [New
satellite-generated rain maps provide improved look at tropical rainfall
(NASA/GSFC)]
December 19, 2000
"Removal
of EPA Investigator Called Political Revenge" - "WASHINGTON,
DC, December 18, 2000 - A federal investigator whose revelations about the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency were damaging to Al Gore's unsuccessful
bid for the White House was relieved of his duties last week by a political
appointee of the outgoing Clinton administration." (ENS)
"Beer,
in moderation, cuts risk of cataracts and heart disease" -
"HONOLULU, Dec. 17 - When you're planning for that Super Bowl party next
month, be sure to include a six-pack of your favorite antioxidants. That's
right, antioxidants! Turns out that beer - in moderation, of course - is
chock-full of healthy stuff that can reduce the risk of cataracts and heart
disease, according to research presented here today at the 2000 International
Chemical Congress of Pacific Basin Societies." [Abstracts are available
by clicking here,
here,
and here.]
(ACS)
"Soya
'may reduce cancer risk'" - "Teenagers eating soya products
may help prevent them getting breast cancer in later life, say experts.
Hawaiian researchers have suggested a long-term diet rich in soya could reduce
risk by up to 50%." (BBC Online) [Click here
for abstract.]
"Can
Theology Of Environment Change Old Trends?" - "A book
entitled, Earth and Faith, published by UNEP details how the religious
approach to environmental conservation can save the already threatened six
thousand years of life on earth. The theology of environment; that is
environment on pulpits and shrines of worshiping is founded on the tenet that
man's spiritual assignment is to make sure that God's creation is not
interfered with, and must be respected." (ACIS)
Nothing new here - modern "environmentalism"
is purely a matter of faith (Gaia worship?) and has no foundation in science
or even simple common sense.
"'Vegan'
Iceman had a taste for wild goat" -
"NEOLITHIC man was a carnivore and not, as American scientists have
claimed, a vegan, according to a new study led by a British researcher."
(The Times)
Biofuel not a panacea? "Fuelwood
Accounts for 80 Percent of Energy Supply in DRC" - "Fuelwood
accounts for about 80 percent of domestic energy consumption in the Congo DR,
according to a senior official, who also condemned the poor management of
forests in the country. Addressing a press conference in Kinshasa at the
weekend to mark 25 years of the creation of the Environment Ministry,
Permanent Secretary Dosithe Hadelin Mbusu Ngamani, noted that coal accounted
for 10 percent of DRC's energy supply, hydro- electricity four percent, and
hydrocarbons, nine percent. He said the poor management of forest resources is
the root cause of environmental degradation in the country, where forests have
virtually disappeared around major cities." [Fuelwood
Depletes Zambia's Forests] (PANA)
"Science
declares rare species a bum steer" - "An elusive and
incredibly rare species of wild steer native to the mist-shrouded highlands of
Cambodia and Vietnam is likely to be taken off the list of endangered fauna -
never to return. The reason: the creature never existed at all." (AFP)
"Annan
Urges Commitment On Treaties" - "UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan, has urged the international community to give equal attention to all
Conventions negotiated or signed in relation to the 1992 "Earth
Summit," in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil." (PANA)
Certainly they are deserving of equal treatment - scrap
the lot for the sake of the planet and humanity.
"Dr.
Strangelunch" - Or: Why we should learn to stop worrying and
love genetically modified food "Ten thousand people were killed and 10 to
15 million left homeless when a cyclone slammed into India’s eastern coastal
state of Orissa in October 1999. In the aftermath, CARE and the Catholic
Relief Society distributed a high-nutrition mixture of corn and soy meal
provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development to thousands of
hungry storm victims. Oddly, this humanitarian act elicited cries of
outrage." (Ronald Bailey, Reason)
"Mad
Cow Reality Confronts Phony Biotech Scare" - "Have
Greenpeace protesters finally thrown up one barricade too many against
biotechnology and the benefits it offers? ... Instead of GM's dangers, though,
these activities offer a wake-up call about Greenpeace as a threat to health.
For the day after Greenpeace spread its phony fears about imports of GM
soybeans, the British science weekly Nature warned of something truly
frightening. The report, by epidemiologist Christi Donnelly of London's
Imperial College School of Medicine, found that as many as 9,800 French cattle
had become infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as
mad-cow disease. Worse, still, some of their meat has entered the human food
chain." (Duane D. Freese, TCS)
"Biotech
corn risk to butterflies appears minimal" - "WASHINGTON --
Life in genetically engineered corn fields may not be as dangerous to monarch
butterflies as once feared, say scientists who studied the insects this
summer. Pollen from the corn can be toxic to the butterflies, whose favorite
food, milkweed, grows in and around corn fields. But the research to be
published next year suggests the risk is low, the scientists say. The
federally subsidized research is the first comprehensive effort to determine
the impact of biotech corn on monarchs." (AP)
"Study
Validates Safety of Bt Crops" - "Yet another study
supports previous evidence that Bt (Bacillus thuringienisis) crops are just as
safe as conventional plant varieties, and because they provide protection
against insects, they also provide significant benefits. However, the study
was carried out by Monsanto, a seed company known for its Bt products. The
study appears in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, Regulatory Toxicology
and Pharmacology." (AgWeb.com)
"Pioneer
postpones 6 hybrids for 2001 that aren't cleared in EU" -
"Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., will postpone sales of six
Pioneer(R) brand corn hybrids that contain a combination of the YieldGard(1)
gene and LibertyLink(2) gene for the 2001 growing season. In a statement, the
firm says the move is to minimize confusion in the marketplace for its
customers." (Pro Farmer)
"Texas
Researchers Clone Calf for Disease Resistance" -
"Researchers at Texas A&M University (TAMU) have successfully cloned
a calf that may provide the genetics to develop disease-free cattle. The
month-old black Angus calf, which was named 86 Squared, was cloned using cells
that were frozen for 15 years. The cells came from Bull 86, which was
naturally resistant to brucellosis. In laboratory conditions, Bull 86 was also
resistant to tuberculosis and salmonellosis." (AgWeb.com)
"New
potato glows green to ask for water" - "LONDON, England --
Scientists have pioneered a genetically modified "super potato"
which glows when it needs water, the head of the project said on Monday.
Researchers at Edinburgh University injected potato plants with a fluorescence
gene borrowed from the luminous jellyfish aequorea victoria, which causes
their leaves to glow green when dehydrated." (Reuters) [AFP]
"French
drug maker faces $164m GM corn payout" - "Aventis SA,
France's largest drug maker, is facing a payout of 100 million euros ($A164
million) to cover costs relating to the recall of its StarLink strain of
genetically engineered corn. The 100-million-euro figure is "currently
the best estimate that we can provide," said Aventis chief financial
officer Patrick Langlois in a statement faxed to news agencies on the weekend.
The charge won't "alter the earnings outlook on a full-year basis."
(The Age)
"Protection
of crops given new approach" - "A FRESH approach to
crop protection technology was unveiled by one of the biggest multinationals
in the field yesterday. This is aimed at linking the demands of the end user -
processor, retailer or consumer - with the agronomic needs of the primary
producer. It will bring together specific crop treatments, including an
enhanced biological control approach, with highly customised seeds and in time
a strong biotechnology, or genetically modified, bias." (The Scotsman)
"The
Cartagena protocol on diversity" - "The first
intergovernmental meeting aiming to minimise the potential risks to the
environment and human health posed by biotechnology and its movement between
countries takes place this week in Montpellier, France." (The Guardian,
Dec 15)
"Govt to
promote biotech in farm, food sectors" - "NEW DELHI: The
government will soon take several steps to popularise the use of biotechnology
in the agriculture and food processing sectors. It will also establish ``more
functional biotechnology parks'' to trigger a revolution in biotech
industries, Union HRD and science minister Murli Manohar Joshi said on
Monday." (Times of India)
"Panel
Wants Tighter Biotech Control" - "WASHINGTON - A committee
formed by the United States and the European Union recommended tighter
controls Monday on genetically engineered foods, including mandatory labeling
of products with biotech ingredients." [US,
Japan To Test for Biotech Corn] (AP) [Panel
Backs Stronger Rules for Some Food (NY Times)]
"Effect
of Climate on Ancient Societies Debated" - "Radical climate
change might ravage civilization -- but it won't be the first time, scientists
say. The world is littered with the weedy ruins of ancient societies like the
Mayans -- peoples that once thrived, then collapsed because they failed to
endure sudden climate shifts, researchers said yesterday at the conference of
the American Geophysical Union." (San Francisco Chronicle)
"Scientific
ignorance blinds leaders to global warming say panel" - "A
panel of scientists says the world's leaders suffer from scientific
illiteracy, which makes them blind to increasing evidence of global warming. A
professor of meteorology at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San
Diego, California, Richard Somerville, says this ignorance is routinely seen
at various conferences investigating recent worldwide climate changes."
(Radio Australia)
Double-edged sword - if not for scientific illiteracy
there wouldn't be an enhanced greenhouse scare to begin with and there'd be
no UNFCCC or IPCC either. This whole farce is enabled only because
politicians don't know that climate change is the normal state of the world
- climate stasis would be most alarming by introduction of a new and
abnormal state.
Sensibly: "U.S.
rejects fresh climate talks" - "BRUSSELS,
Belgium -- Hopes of restarting international talks aimed at reaching
agreement on greenhouse gas emissions have been dashed after the United States
rejected a new meeting with European leaders. EU environment ministers had
hoped to resume the talks -- which broke down last month in The Hague -- later
this week, but a French government spokeswoman said on Monday that the U.S.
had turned down an invitation to attend. The so-called "U.S. umbrella
group," consisting of Canada, Australia, Japan and New Zealand, also
rejected the invitation to travel to Oslo, Norway for the talks." (CNN) [EU
Says U.S. Rejects Oslo Meeting on Climate Change; U.S.
declines new climate talks with Europe (Reuters)] [EU
fails in bid to broker climate deal (Guardian)] [Last
chance for an emissions deal before Mr Bush steps in; Americans
dash hopes of climate change deal (Independent)] [US
'spurns' global warming talks (BBC Online)] [Hopes
fade of climate talks deal (Financial times)] [Climate
talks 'are over until Bush arrives' (Telegraph)]
Even if there were any merit in the enhanced
greenhouse hypothesis, it is absolutely scandalous to contemplate such an
elitist clique meeting without the developing world's participation. Then
there's the little matter of how utterly pointless it would be without China
and India, who will shortly be the world's most prolific emitters of the
gases supposedly of concern.
"A
November to Remember" - "Cultural historians will remember
November 2000 for its 30 days of cable Tee-Vee talking heads reporting on a
Presidential election, 24 hours per day, with the caption "Breaking
News—Florida still too close to call" running for 30,000 hours
straight. That news story broke about as quickly as "Act Now—Global
Warming on It's Way!" The blessing in disguise is that, thus distracted,
the U.S. media completely and almost unilaterally ignored the global warming
treaty negotiations in the Hague. So let us fill you in. At the meeting, the
same folks who have been chanting, "Save the Planet, Plant a Tree"
for 30 years suddenly started sounding remarkably like strip-mall developers.
The United States proposed that we eat up a bunch of our emissions by planting
trees and the greens said no, thank you." (GES)
"Robot
sub to find secrets of Antarctic krill" - "... Krill are
small, shrimp-like creatures that graze the underside of sea ice. 'They are
crucial to all wildlife in the southern oceans,' said Brierley, of the British
Antarctic Survey. 'Krill eat a form of algae called phytoplankton, and in turn
are eaten by everything else - fish, seals, polar bears. If krill die out, so
would all these creatures.' Researchers have recently discovered that krill
thrive in climatic extremes. When winters are severe and sea ice is thickest,
then the crustaceans do well. In warm, iceless periods, they decline. ... 'It
is crucial that we find out exactly what is going on, however - for if global
warming continues, and sea-ice shrinks as we expect, then the world's krill
could die out, taking out all creatures that feed on them.'" (The
Guardian)
Quite apart from the simple fact that there has been a
net increase in Antarctic sea ice area since the 1950s (which is as long as
we have been observing it), current evidence indicates that Antarctic
denizens prosper in milder Antarctic seasons. For example, in
February, AAP echoed this AFP bulletin: Fine weather and abundant food
have led to a penguin "baby boom" near Japan's Showa Antarctic
expedition base, Japanese researchers said today. The number of Adelie
penguin chicks which left a nesting area some 25 kilometers south of Showa
Base this season jumped 40 percent from a year earlier to 215, according to
a Japanese pool press report from the base. ... "Fine weather has
prevailed this season and ice did not close up holes through which food is
caught," said Yutaka Watanuki, associate professor at Hokkaido
University. Watanuki has led the one-and-a-half-month research of penguin
population growth. He said that krill, tiny planktonic crustaceans, which
are the main source of food for penguins, had been abundant this nesting
season. ... Record growth was registered in the 1997-1998 nesting season [during
the period of extraordinary El Niño-induced warmth] when 356 chicks
left their nests as strong winds pushed ice away from the sea around the
nesting site, enabling the parents to catch food in a short time. ... In the
1998-1999 season, bad weather covered the sea with thick ice, and many
chicks starved to death as their parents were forced to travel long
distances in search for food.
"Cats
and Dogs, Models and Reality"
- "We don’t know how to explain this, but it seems there are an awful
lot of universal polarities. Cats and dogs do not get along. Neither do
Republicans and Democrats. Nor, most of the time (it seems), do men and women.
Likewise for scientific modelers and data gatherers. Indeed, we have often
joked that the very creative people who design and tinker with general
circulation models (GCMs)—which form the basis for the Kyoto Protocol and
other major greenhouse concerns—seem to thrive in a data-free
environment." (GES)
"2000 IN
REVIEW: THE YEAR BEGAN WITH RECORD WARMTH IN THE U.S. AND ENDS WITH COLDER
THAN NORMAL TEMPERATURES ACROSS MUCH OF THE COUNTRY" -
"Annual U.S. and Global Temperatures Remain Well above Average"
(NOAA)
Really? NOAA's own CPC provides this
map for November temperature departure from normal (latest available),
showing most of the US to be distinctly below normal, in fact the second coldest
since 1895. Their Sep-Nov
three-month average also seems to indicate mostly sub-normal
temperatures while the annual
mean departure map shows most of the US within about 1°F of long-term
mean (neither here nor there in terms of normal interannual climatic
variation). Tropospheric
mean temperature shows the world is actually a little on the cool side.
"Historic
records reveal links between El Niño, coastal erosion, and shifting sands of
beaches in central California" - "SAN FRANCISCO, CA--Erosion
of seacliffs, damage to coastal structures, and the comings and goings of
beach sand along California's central coast are all closely linked to the
intense winter storms associated with El Niño. Two new studies by researchers
at the University of California, Santa Cruz, reveal the connections between
this climatic heavy hitter and the processes that shape the coastline of
California." (UCSC) [The
Oregonian]
Couldn't resist the global warming-induced sea level
rise - despite IPCC-sponsored studies finding absolutely no supportive
evidence for such a contention. Sigh...
"West
Antarctic Ice Sheet may be a smaller source of current sea-level rise"
- "The West Antarctic Ice Sheet’s contribution to global sea-level rise
may be much slower today than it was in the past. New evidence indicates that
the size of the ice sheet thousands of years ago has been overestimated and
the ice sheet may not have been as big or as steady a source of sea-level rise
as scientists thought. ... "Our previous best estimates that the ice
sheet is adding 1 millimeter per year to global sea level are almost certainly
too high," says Bindschadler. ... "The portion of the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet we have focused on for the past ten years appears to be in stage of
near-zero retreat now," says Bindschadler, "but what it will do in
the future is still uncertain." (NASA/GSFC)
December 18, 2000
In the "Oh!" zone: "Study:
Despite efforts, ozone layer will take long time to heal"
-
"SAN FRANCISCO, California -- For decades we've been cutting out use of
aerosol cans and foam cups because the chemicals in them -- CFCs -- harm the
atmosphere. Now there's new science that says recovery of the ozone layer may
take not just several years, but perhaps half-a-century or more. In a study
presented this week at the American Geophysical Union conference in San
Francisco, scientists say they were stunned by findings that up to 70 percent
of the ozone layer over the North Pole has been lost." (CNN)
Hmm... I believe these results were derived from THESEO
2000 (NASA's cooperative effort going under the label "SOLVE"): THESEO 2000 (Third
European Stratospheric Experiment on Ozone) media
release. The release reads, in part "Ozone losses of over 60% have
occurred in the Arctic stratosphere near 18km altitude during one of the
coldest stratospheric winters on record. These losses are likely to affect
the ozone levels over Europe during spring. This is one of the most
substantial ozone losses at this altitude in the Arctic." Sounds
very dramatic doesn't it? Let's look at a little more of the release. Buried
further down, below the emphasised section, we find: "The effect on
column ozone was slightly mitigated by the fact that ozone loss was less
dramatic above 20 km altitude... The average polar column amount of ozone
for the first 2 weeks of March was 16% lower than observed in the
1980's." So, instead of Arctic ozone depletion of over 60%, as the
press has dutifully reported, for two weeks it was actually about 16%
"low" - the 60-70% 'loss' figure apparently applies to 'at 18km
altitude.' On the whole, not very exciting in the context of normal
variability. Check out the massive ozone levels in the Northern Hemisphere
compared with the Southern during this 'depletion event' - here's the global
total ozone maps, March
1; March
8 and; March
15 - the period eliciting such concern. Some two-thirds of total global
ozone seems to be in the Northern Temperate and Arctic zone during this
period. How's it compare with before and after views? Here's the February
8 and April
8 shots (there's nothing magical about the 8th, I just
arbitrarily chose that as the middle of the THESEO-mentioned 'first two
weeks' with a calendar month offset before and after). The near-complete archive of Earth Probe TOMS images since July 25, 1996
can be
accessed here.
So, is this 'depletion' definitely the result of
aerosol can propellents and refrigerant gases? Actually, theories abound -
try this one, if for no other reason than novelty value: Moscow Times, March
24, 1999 - Scientist
Calls for Curb on Harmful Rocket Launches - "... Alexei Yablokov,
head of the Center for Environmental Policy, said that pollution from rocket
fuel was a major cause of damage to the earth's ozone layer ... Chief among
the dangers, Yablokov said, are the clouds of hydrogen and carbon dioxide
left hanging in the atmosphere for weeks after launches. He attributed 50
percent of the shrinking of the earth's ozone layer to rocket
launches." So much more interesting than hairspray and refrigerators
isn't it? For a little more variety try: Sun
to blame for ozone hole, not people claim scientists - "...
The hole in the ozone layer in the South Pole is due to the Sun, not people,
according to research by a Chinese scientist, Xinhua news agency said today.
Yang Xuexiang, a professor of geological sciences at Changchun University of
Technology, believes the damage is caused by solar winds, a current of
high-energy particles, rather than the use of freon, the official news
agency said." Of course, the European Space Agency says ozone is not depleting
but actually increasing due to increased solar UV irradiance and the simple
fact is that no one knows what it 'should' be or what cycles can and should
be expected in Earth's conceptual 'ozone layer.'
So take your pick, Earth's ozone is
decreasing/stable/increasing and this is caused by surface use of
heavier-than-air gases/volcanic activity/rocket launches/solar activity.
Not having the vaguest
notion of whether or not the Earth's ozone layer has a boo-boo, we're going to
'fix' it - it's just going to take a lot longer (and much, much more taxpayers'
money) than we first thought.
"The
New Uncertainty Principle" - "For complex environmental
issues, science learns to take a backseat to political precaution"
(Scientific American)
David Appell promotes the Precautionary Principle
in Scientific American. Curiously, The Principle is ill
defined, often misquoted and almost invariably misapplied. Principle 15 (the Precautionary
Principle) from The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992),
reads: Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack
of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing
cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.
I read that as meaning: Where there is reasonable
certainty of a cause-and-effect relationship resulting in significant harm
from a specific, well-defined activity, absolute proof should not be required
to initiate cost-effective remedial action. At face value that would
seem simple common sense. Regrettably, that is not how the misanthropist
anti-science fraternity cite or wish to apply The Principle. What they
wish to do is corrupt The Principle to something along the lines of: No
activity must be permitted where there is an absence of proof of absolute
safety. Obviously such a condition is impossible to satisfy and becomes
a situation in which any enterprise or activity of which any ideologue
disapproves may be disallowed on those grounds.
See also the Social
Issues Research Centre's Fickle
precaution: Ironically, perhaps, it is the Precautionary
Principle itself which should come with a health warning - a large sticker
which declares "This principle may set back the course of scientific
progress to the extent that lives will be endangered, medical innovations will
be postponed and reduction of famine word-wide will be delayed
significantly."
"Belgian
Expert Bemoans EU Panic Over BSE" - "BRUSSELS - Belgium's
top mad cow expert joined others on Saturday in warning that the European
Union's latest attempts to stem the spread of the disease smacked of panic and
could exacerbate risks to human health. "The European Union has played
panic football under pressure from the consumer," Emmanuel Vanopdenbosch
of Belgium's Centre for Veterinary and Agrochemcial Research said in an
interview with the newspaper De Standaard." (Reuters)
"Mad
cow disease waning in Europe, say experts" - "Swedish
experts said Friday that mad cow disease is on the wane in Europe, with new
slaughtering and animal feed production rules combining with intensified
quality controls to make EU beef safe. "BSE as a problem is becoming
extinct," Stig Widell, a senior official at the animal department of the
national board of agriculture told a seminar on bovine spongiform
encephalopathy, or BSE, the brain-wasting cattle disorder commonly called mad
cow disease." (Reuters)
"Sun-loving
doctors ignore cancer risk" - "DOCTORS and nurses are
ignoring their own warnings on the dangers of sunbathing and putting
themselves at risk of skin cancer, according to a new study. Members of the
medical profession do not apply their knowledge about the risks of sun
exposure to themselves and are just as likely to get sunburned on holiday as
their patients, researchers at Dundee University found." (Sunday Times)
"WHAT
ON EARTH?" (Washington Post)
Dita Smith delicately reproduces the usual misinformation
(cited as coming from WWF and WWI) on POPs, including the perennial favourite,
male alligators with physical abnormalities and difficulty reproducing.
The ol' 'alligators with small phalluses' line again eh? Mike Fumento did a
piece Hormonally
Challenged last year, well worth the read but if you're in a hurry
just scroll down to the cute 'worried gator' graphic for the section on Alligator
angst and wildlife woes.
"UK
reveals why cod have had their chips" - "The British
government has revealed the real truth behind the disappearance of cod from
the North Sea — they just can't swim very well." (Reuters)
"Ecology
takes a beating with increasing mouths to feed" - "MANGALORE:
Meeting the food requirement for the increasing world population could be
ascribed as one of the major causes for converting forest land into agricultural
production. And this could be the mother cause for most of the environmental
deterioration, said V.R. Patil of Rallis Research Centre, Bangalore here, on
Thursday." [Science
congress has food for thought on hand] (Times of India)
How inconsiderate that people are not willing to starve
for some wealthy nation's conservation ideal.
"Weathermen
find that life is wetter in the suburbs" - "... The
British rain research – carried out, aptly enough, in Manchester, and
published in the journal Atmospheric Research – suggests that both the
shape of cities and the way they heat up the air around them swells rain clouds,
which are then blown by the wind to drop their contents nearby."
(Independent)
Gosh, they've discovered UHIE and local weather
generation. New Scientist ran a feature Totally
Tropical Tokyo on the same thing back in September. The
significance to the wider debate about enhanced greenhouse is, of course, that
surface temperature recordings are becoming increasingly biased to urban
recording sites - meaning that we are wrecking the temperature record by
reading cities' microclimates (less than 1% of the planet's surface) rather
than what is happening in the real world. This is the most likely reason for
urban-biased readings suggesting dramatic warming while analysis of long-term
rural and remote stations and the balloon and satellite readings show little
or no net warming since the 1930s. With the much-touted surface warming very
likely purely illusory as a result of data bias we hit the major hurdle for
the computer games (climate models). Much has been made in recent days about a
model able to (supposedly) reproduce the last century's mean temperature
track. Big problem - if it's reproducing a recent warming trend which does not
exist in reality then it is guaranteed to produce projections of future
warming which will not exist either. Basing global policy decisions on
illusions is a very bad idea.
CoP6 I(c)? "Final
bid to stop warming" -
"Ministers will this week launch a last-ditch bid to save the world's
battle against global warming, in the wake of last month's disastrous summit
in the Hague. European environment ministers, who failed to reach agreement in
the Dutch capital, will tomorrow try to hammer out a joint position and, if
successful, will then fly to Oslo for an emergency summit on Wednesday."
(Independent)
December 16-17, 2000
"Studies
show normal children today report more anxiety than child psychiatric patients
in the 1950's" - "WASHINGTON — Two new meta-analytic
studies involving thousands of children and college students show that anxiety
has increased substantially since the 1950's. In fact, the studies find that
anxiety has increased so much that typical schoolchildren during the 1980's
reported more anxiety than child psychiatric patients did during the 1950's.
The findings appear in the December issue of the American Psychological
Association's (APA) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology." (APA)
Wonder if this is something of which the press and whacko
brigade is particularly proud? Despite significantly increased lifespans,
quality of life, health, standards of living, demonstrably improving
environment, air and water quality etc., etc., kids are being effectively
terrorised and have higher anxiety levels than those of 50 years ago
(when global thermonuclear war was seen a genuine and pressing threat).
Greenpeace, Sierra, Pew, Suzuki et al, take a bow for scaring kids
witless with your utter nonsense - you must be proud. The blathering
left-of-centre press deserves much credit for so aiding and abetting the
B.S. campaigns too. Well done, so very well done. Regrettably, they are not
the only ones:
"Panel
Says Estrogen a Cancer Agent" - "WASHINGTON - Estrogen, the
so-called female hormone, should be listed as a known cancer-causing agent,
government advisers said on Friday. The hormone, which has long been
associated with breast and uterine cancers, should be added to the latest
report on cancer-causing agents, the advisers to the National Toxicology Panel
(NTP) said." (Reuters)
Well isn't this just Jim Dandy! Estrogen, naturally
produced or otherwise, is a carcinogen. So mothers' milk, naturally
containing estrogen, is a noxious carcinogen. By extension, compounds which
bind to estrogen receptors will be considered likely carcinogens by activity
class. I'm trying to imagine some foodstuff which doesn't contain
animal or plant estrogens but I just haven't got any entries on my list yet.
So all foods should be considered carcinogenic?
Pray, why would we terrorise the general populace by
placing on the 'nasty' list compounds which we know do significant good and
suspect of doing much more of enormous value? We are already noting health
problems with people avoiding essential UVB exposure to the point
where they are not synthesising sufficient vitamin D and so enhancing their
risk of bone disease, cancer, etc., so why are we doing this?
Where is the health advantage in terrifying people with
negligible risk possibilities when there are definite benefits in
consumption or exposure? The NTP appears to be the greater hazard.
"Survey
shows drop in smoking by teens; use of drug Ecstasy up" -
"WASHINGTON -- Teenage drug use held steady in 2000, the fourth straight
year it has either fallen or stayed the same, the federal government reported
Thursday. Smoking dropped significantly but use of the club drug Ecstasy
climbed for the second year in a row." (AP)
Oh well, there's a dazzlingly good risk exchange -
let's devote a few more billion to convert even more of our kids from
potential smokers to junkies.
"Cell-phone
ban omitted in BLM wilderness areas" -
"Dec. 15, 2000 - WASHINGTON - The Clinton
administration has decided not to ban cellular telephones or other hand-held
electronic instruments, such as the increasingly popular global positioning
devices, from the 5.5 million acres of wilderness controlled by the Bureau of
Land Management." (Denver Post)
Not banning safety equipment? That's very nice of them.
"Govt
grants $1.2m to mobile phone health research" - "The federal
government today signed off on a $1.2 million research project into possible
links between mobile phone use and cancer. Health Minister Michael Wooldridge
said the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project was
prompted by public concern about the possible health risks of mobile phones.
The funding will support a special research program to investigate whether the
electromagnetic energy from mobile phones has any harmful effects on
people." (AAP)
On and on it goes... I used to think the only plausible
mechanism left for human harm from cell phones was having one fall on you
from a great height but it was recently pointed out to me that they are
becoming so small now that they may be an ingestion risk.
"Phone
tower fears ignored" - "Health issues alone should no longer
be grounds for rejecting cellphone tower sites, says the Ministry for the
Environment. Guidelines the ministry released yesterday say that the health
risks from radio frequency transmitters are negligible as long as they comply
with the New Zealand standard." (NZ Herald)
"Traces
of Environmental Chemicals in the Human Body: Are They a Risk to Health?" — All living organisms are continually exposed to
foreign chemicals, also known as "xenobiotics." These chemicals
include substances that are natural (e.g., toxins produced by molds, plants,
and animals) and man-made (e.g., drugs, industrial chemicals, pesticides, and
pollutants). ... For more information and a complete version of the
publication, please refer to the following link: http://www.acsh.org/publications/booklets/traceChem.pdf"
(ACSH)
"Let
Them Eat Fat" - "You know that
to stay healthy you should eat a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet. But should you
feed your children the same way? Not when they're newborns, says the Instituto
de Nutricion y Tecnologia de los Alimentos at the University of Chile." (HealthScout)
"Did
genetically modified foods reach India?" - "AFTER the
brouhaha over cheap Chinese imports, the focus has now shifted to genetically
modified foods. Stung by the criticism that genetically engineered foods may
have "unknowingly" found their way into India as part of US aid and
relief to the Orissa flood victims, the government has begun the process of
looking into the issue." (Economic Times)
This
is a result of Vandana Shiva (pictured) et al whingeing that Orissa
cyclone survivors had been 'subjected' to 'biotech contaminated' grain
'dumped' by the US. The alternate explanation is that survivors received
part of the normal US grain supply, which includes a range of approved
biotech-improved varieties, donated in their time of need. Shiva does not
appear on intimate terms with starvation, although I suspect this has more
to do with her stipend as a physics professor at an obscure Indian
university than it does her organic garden. One of Shiva's claims to fame
(or do I mean infamy?) is the assertion that the green revolution is
responsible for starvation and that the world, particularly India, would be
awash with surplus food if only everyone switched to organic agriculture. I
make no secret of my opinion that Vandana Shiva is an A-grade flake.
"Organic
food for thought" - "In June,
the food chain Iceland announced that all future own-brand frozen vegetables
would be organic but that their price would not increase – organic food
often costs up to twice as much as conventionally-produced food. A leader in
challenging GM foods, Iceland is now moving to make organic food available to
more consumers (although it may well remain beyond the incomes of the quarter
of the British population living in poverty). But ironically the company's
announcement raises other health and environmental concerns." (Health
Matters)
Note also that organic accounts for just 1% of the UK
market while the 3% of UK agriculture devoted to its production can supply
only one-fourth of that. Implied then is that organic agriculture's
footprint is an order of magnitude greater than that of conventional
agriculture. How 'environmentally friendly' is that?
"THE
CANADIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE RELEASES BACKGROUND PAPERS ON
GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS, PATENTING OF HIGHER LIFE FORMS, GENETIC PRIVACY
AND ETHICS" - "Ottawa, December 15, 2000 - The Canadian
Biotechnology Advisory Committee (CBAC), today released ten background papers
on key biotechnology issues. The papers were commissioned by CBAC to assist
the Committee in its shaping of advice to government on public policies
relating to biotechnology. ... These papers, which are posted on the CBAC
website (cbac-cccb.ca) were released in
accordance with CBAC's commitment to openness." (Canadian Biotechnology
Advisory Committee)
"Gene-Altered
Corn: The Furor Is Unwarranted" - "The bottom line on corn
products recalled because they contain StarLink, a genetically improved corn
variety approved only for animal consumption, is that not one person has been
or is likely to be harmed by eating StarLink corn (front page, Dec. 11).
Exhaustive testing has revealed no allergic reactions, toxicity or any other
problem with StarLink. ..." (Henry I Miller's letter to the NY Times)
"EU
Says Preparing New GMO Labeling Rules" - "BRUSSELS - The
European Commission (news
- web
sites) confirmed on Friday it was preparing a raft of new legislation
designed to reassure consumers about the safety of food made from genetically
modified crops (Reuters)
"Rockfeller
grant for rice molecular breeding scheme" - "COIMBATORE: The
Rockfeller Foundation of the US has sanctioned a Rs 52-lakh research scheme
for rice molecular breeding to Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU). The
grant would be utilised to conduct research in the development of strategies
in three key areas of rice molecular breeding to augment the conventional
plant breeders to speed up their development process, a TNAU release said on
Thursday." (Times of India)
"A
nuclear debate" - "Sometimes, environmental disagreements
come down to a single troubling question. Today's is: Can you live without
electricity?" (GAM)
"The
Greens need to think again about nuclear power"
- "We talk about the weather at the drop of a hat, but for once we are
justified: it has been a remarkable autumn. More than that, an extreme one:
the wettest ever, with heavier rainfall than any since records began in the
18th century. December, moreover, is likely to be one of the warmest on
record, with strange consequences in the natural world, as we report today.
Although neither of these facts can be directly linked to global warming, they
do fit the predictions that scientists have been making about climate change,
so now is perhaps a good time to think again about the options available to
tackle this most pressing of worldwide problems." (Independent) [Nuclear
power is back in fashion with the Finns (The Times)]
"Scientists
Study Threat of Huge Volcanic Eruptions" - "SAN FRANCISCO -
Scientists said on Friday they were stepping up research into the global
threat posed by massive volcanic eruptions -- devastating and inevitable
explosions of magma, ash and gas that promise to have severe and lasting
impact on the world's climate. ... Hans Graf of the Max Planck Institute for
Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany, said a drive was underway to establish a
clearer understanding of the effects of volcanic explosion on the atmosphere,
which range from venting huge amounts of ozone-damaging chlorine and bromine
compounds to filling the skies with aerosol droplets that can absorb solar
heat." (Reuters)
"Nature
blooms in mysterious ways during a British winter that thinks it's a
spring" - "... Summers may not be much hotter, but
winters are certainly less cold." (Independent)
The Indy takes a whole column to get around to
the real crux of enhanced greenhouse warming prediction - less severe cold
events and that is exactly how misnamed greenhouse warming would work, it
should be called global less-colding but that doesn't have the same scary
connotations.
Three-fourths of estimated increase in global mean
temperature is made up from the super cold air winter masses of Siberia and
Canada descending to less-severe extremes and has nothing to do with
increase in maximum temperature at all. Whether this is a trend or whether
it is simply an artefact of cycles we don't yet recognise remains to be
seen. THESEO 2000 reported increased Arctic ozone destruction this year due
to, you guessed it, particularly cold winter air mass. Most unfortunately
for Mongolia, last winter they suffered through their 'Zud' - an especially
harsh winter following summer drought - and this year looks like being a
repeat performance (please consider making the Red Cross/Red Crescent
Societies' Mongolian Relief Appeal one of your charitable donation
recipients this year). Canada and the US, most people will be aware, are
suffering heavy snow and ice storms fairly early in the season as successive
breakouts of cold Artic air occur. A year or two's events do not make a
trend in climatic terms but these will tend to suppress the mean temperature
trend significantly - making our global less-colding virtually non-existent.
Meanwhile:
"Scientists
Suggest New Threat to Antarctic Ice" - "SAN FRANCISCO - The
West Antarctic ice sheet, closely watched as an indicator of the impact of
global warming, may be imperiled by a different threat -- a slowing of the
"ice streams" which nourish the massive shelf. Scientists told a
meeting of the American Geophysical Union on Friday that new research
indicated the ice streams could be slowing because of the gradually changing
shape of the ice sheet over the past 10,000 years. Slawek Tulaczyk, an
assistant professor of Earth Sciences at the University of California, Santa
Cruz, said the new model proposed that the ice streams -- fast, river-like
flows which move ice out into ice shelves floating on the sea -- were slowing
and in some cases stopping altogether. "In the most extreme case, some
models suggest that these changes could result in a shift from the current
interglacial climate to another glacial period," Tulaczyk said."
(Reuters)
Maybe, certainly cooling is evident in the South Pole
record measured at the Amundsen-Scott
Antarctic scientific base.
"Recovery
of Arctic ozone layer may take longer than expected" -
"Scientists expect that recovery of the Arctic ozone layer may be slower
than previously expected because of unusually low stratospheric temperatures.
... These panelists have worked on the joint SAGE III Ozone Loss and
Validation Experiment (SOLVE) and Third European Stratospheric Experiment on
Ozone (THESEO 2000) and obtained comprehensive measurements of halogen
compounds (chlorine and bromine) that have given them a better understanding
of how human-produced compounds destroy the ozone layer. These observations
have shown how factors other than CFCs and halons contribute to winter ozone
decreases." (NASA/GSFC)
Another shock, simplistic notions of anthropogenic gas
emission = ozone depletion don't work out in the real world. Translation: there
will be 'a delay in repair of the ozone layer' because the Montreal Protocol
is a farce, the conceptual ozone layer isn't actually broken and we need to
defer expectation of promised result from our solution to a non-problem to a
point far enough in the future that we'll be safely retired and expired
before people are sure how wrong we are.
"'Raining'
electrons contribute to ozone destruction" - "Scientists
involved in the study of Solar-Atmospheric Coupling by Electrons (SOLACE) will
report on this finding at the Fall American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting in
San Francisco, December 15-19, 2000. They have determined that this coupling
can create a significant amount of nitrogen oxides highlighting a new aspect
of natural ozone destruction." (NASA/GSFC)
Gasp! You mean those who have been pointing to solar
wind variations coupling with ozone destruction events may know what they
are talking about after all? Imagine that...
"President
gives farewell warning on global warming" - "President Bill
Clinton used his last big foreign speech yesterday to focus on the plight of
the developing world, especially the devastation caused by Aids and by climate
change." (Guardian)
Yep, here's
the track of the atmospheric warming we're not having.
"Global
Warming Could Make Water A Scarce Resource" - "OAKLAND,
California, December 15, 2000 - Global warming could have serious impacts on
water resources in the United States, and some of those effects are already
being felt, a new report released today concludes. To counter those effects,
government and water management officials must act now - a prescription that
may be a hard sell under the new George W. Bush administration." (ENS)
Amazing. General Circulation Models rely absolutely
on massive positive feedback because even a trebling of CO2 and
all the other minor greenhouse gases combined are known to be incapable of
producing anything like the desired catastrophic warming. This positive
feedback takes the form of significant increase in the only major
greenhouse gas - water vapour. And what would we expect from significant
increase in atmospheric water vapour but increased precipitation (duh!).
What effects would we expect from increased precipitation? Well, increased
fresh water supplies for one. Another point so-often overlooked is that
increased precipitation would also mean increased polar
precipitation, with associated increase in land ice in the major ice shields
- which would slow or even reverse sea level rise. Of course, increase in
the major ice sheets would have associated increase in albedo - meaning that
more solar radiation would be reflected back to space and thus would have a
cooling effect on the Earth, damping rather than exacerbating postulated
enhanced greenhouse warming as a significant negative feedback. Oops!
Not to worry - just don't mention such little flaws and
crank up the hysteria another notch - the press will run any scare if you
hype it enough.
"Hotter
Earth is confirmed by computer" - "THE most sophisticated
computer simulation of the world's climate is published today, and concludes
that recent global warming is man-made and will continue. For the first time,
scientists have combined the most important human and natural factors in one
model to create what they claim is the most comprehensive simulation of
20th-century climate." (Telegraph) [We’re
to blame for the weather (The Scotsman)]
Moral: don't live in a computer - try the real world
instead. Now for an admission of just how much we don't know about
predicting weather:
"Cold?
Blame the Hudson Bay Vortex" - "There is an unpredictable
monster sitting above Hudson Bay and it's being blamed for this week's snow
chaos and cold temperatures, and could be responsible for more to come. The
polar vortex, recently dubbed the Hudson Bay Vortex, is a mass of low pressure
spinning in the Arctic. Its counter-clockwise motion is pushing cold arctic
air south, making things chilly in Quebec, Ontario and Manitoba." [It's
not been so white in 21 years] (Toronto Star)
"Climate
treaty looks shaky" - "Paris - Hopes for implementing a key
UN treaty to fight the threat of global warming look at best uncertain after
George W. Bush's election win, analysts say. Under a Bush presidency, the US
is likely to delay or even reject the Kyoto Protocol, leaving the European
Union (EU) and other parties to try to make the treaty work without the
country which is the biggest source of the problem." (Sapa-AFP)
They couldn't stitch together anything like an
agreement at CoP6 (or at CoP6 I a and CoP6 I b either) and this is
president-elect George Walker Bush's fault?
December 15, 2000
"Gagging
on Statistical Pollution" - "You don't have to be able to
smell or see air pollution to die from it." That's that how the
Associated Press reported news of the latest study on air pollution (see "Study:
Tiny Particles Do Increase Deaths"). The study in the New England
Journal of Medicine (Dec.14) claims to be "consistent evidence that
the levels of fine particulates in the air are associated with the risk of
death from all causes and from cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses."
"The findings should squelch criticism that earlier research at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Harvard and elsewhere was inconclusive, said
James H. Ware, dean of the Harvard School of Public Health," reported the
AP. Hardly. The study is simply statistical flim-flammery." (Steve Milloy
in Fox News)
"Talc
Removed From Cancer List" - "WASHINGTON — A federal
scientific panel wrestled over the safety of talc powder on Thursday before
finally deciding that it shouldn't be added to the nation's list of
cancer-causing substances. Some studies have associated the use of talc in
feminine hygiene products with ovarian cancer. But after a daylong debate, the
scientists voted 7-3 that the evidence wasn't convincing enough that talc
powder was a carcinogen. The committee of scientists advises the National
Toxicology Program, a branch of the National Institutes of Health that every
two years updates the federal list of proven and suspected cancer-causing
substances. Still facing scrutiny as the panel concludes its meeting Friday
are estrogen — the types used for birth control and post-menopausal
treatment — and inhaled wood dust. On Wednesday, the panel voted to add
ultraviolet radiation — those sunburn-causing rays long known to cause skin
cancer — to the official carcinogen list." (AP)
Score half-point for rationality - lose fifty points
for lunacy. Just who, might one ask, would someone sue for "excess solar
irradiance," for example? ("Pardon me Lord, but I have a summons
for you"?) Do we go after trees for producing carcinogens later found
in sawdust? How about fruit and vegetables for containing phytoestrogens?
Does the term "bureaucracy gone mad" ring any bells?
Let's be brutally honest shall we? Talc is, well...
natural. Sunlight is, uh... natural. Environmental exposure to plant and
animal hormones is, you guessed it, natural. Guess what? Cancer is natural
too. It is the absence of carcinogens that is unnatural. You
don't have to like them but you sure can't regulate your way to freedom from
them.
Groan! Must everything be "someone
else's" fault? "DVT
actions could encompass train, coach trips" - "Litigations
relating to "economy-class syndrome" could encompass long-distance
train and coach travel after a report that a woman died following a journey on
the Indian Pacific, a Perth solicitor said today. A middle-aged woman died
after a Perth-Sydney trip on the trans-Australian train about five years ago,
indicating long road trips could result in deep vein thrombosis (DVT), said
lawyer Murray Posa from legal firm Hoffmans. As well as leading lawyers Slater
and Gordon, Hoffmans is investigating possible litigation on behalf of people
who have suffered DVT, or blood clotting reported after long plane
rides." (AAP)
A pox on lawyers, I say! In life (and death), you pays
your money and you takes your chance - and it's about time to take
responsibility for your own actions. I'm not certain about taxes but death is
inevitable and businesses don't try to kill paying customers (no profit
margin or repeat business in it). Gimme a break!
"Gunmakers
not about to run up white flag" - "Lawsuits may have forced
Big Tobacco to buckle - first one company and then, like dominoes, the rest.
But the same see-you-in-court tactic does not seem to be working, at least so
far, with the nation's gun manufacturers. True, Smith & Wesson, America's
largest gunmaker, agreed nine months ago to make significant changes in the
way it makes and markets its products. And the company settled a major lawsuit
this week with Boston, one of dozens of cities across the US that have gone to
court to try to force gunmakers to help pay for the costs of gun-related
violence. But smaller gunmakers, heeding the advice of the National Rifle
Association (NRA), have remained strong in their resolve to fight such
lawsuits. "Other gun manufacturers are still doing things by the old
rules, winning lawsuit after lawsuit," says Robert Pugsley, professor of
criminal law at Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles.
"The NRA has played a very major role," he adds, taking "a hard
line in front of what is likely to be intense pressure." (CSM)
"EU fails
to back tougher cigarette health warnings" - "BRUSSELS,
Belgium: European Union health ministers declined on Thursday to endorse
European Parliament proposals for bigger, more graphic health warnings on
cigarette packages, saying they will seek to tone these down in negotiations
with the EU assembly. In a related development, EU Health Commissioner David
Byrne told the ministers he will propose a new bill to curb tobacco
advertising to replace EU legislation the European Court of Justice voided in
October saying it was legally flawed." (AP)
"Deaths
prompt fears of new CJD cluster" - "Health officials are
investigating a possible link between the deaths of two men from the human
form of BSE. Steven Lunt, 34, and Paul Dickens, 28, one of the latest victims
believed to have died from variant CJD, both lived in Adswood, Stockport,
Greater Manchester. Their proximity is bound to raise fears of a new
"cluster" such as those already being examined in Leicestershire.
There have been five victims in the county, four with links to the village of
Queniborough, and three victims from Armthorpe, near Doncaster, south
Yorkshire. The Leicestershire investigation is concentrating on the
preparation and sale of meat products locally in the 1980s. But although
infected beef is prime suspect for the entire vCJD epidemic, there is still no
proof." (Guardian)
Gasp! "U.S.
finds little health benefit in organic foods" - "More than
10 years after a law required the federal government to issue standards on
organic food, the Department of Agriculture is about to release rules that say
such products are neither safer nor more nutritious than conventional
foods." (AP via Bergen Record)
"U.S.
sets environmental guidelines for future trade pacts" -
"WASHINGTON -- In a bid to clean up the image of free trade, the Clinton
administration on Wednesday issued final guidelines for assessing the impact
future trade agreements could have on the environment." (Reuters)
Let's be unambiguous and unequivocal - free trade
promotes wealth generation and wealth generation is the prerequisite
for environmental protection and repair. Anything interfering with
free trade, including warm and fuzzy baggage in trade agreements, hampers
said environmental protection and repair and should be expunged for the sake
of the environment. Slick Willy's quest for a 'legacy' should be impeached
too.
"Robert
Kennedy Jr. And 650,000 Americans Urge President Clinton To Designate Arctic
Refuge Coastal Plain A National Monument" - "Standing next
to sacks holding more than 650,000 petitions, Robert Kennedy Jr. and members
of the Alaska Coalition today called on President Clinton to designate the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge coastal plain a national monument."
(INTERNET WIRE)
Lemme see, Bob endorsed, uhm... Nader wasn't it? But
second choice is to have Slick Willy harm American citizens because Ozone Al
has missed his big chance to do so?
"Foolish
Fat Tax Reappears" - "The Center for Science in the Public
Interest's (CSPI) Michael Jacobson continues his crusade for a "Twinkie
tax" on high-calorie food in this month's CSPI newsletter. Jacobson says
the reason for the tax is to "fund health campaigns," but that's not
really what's behind this movement. The real thinking behind the "Twinkie
tax," as expressed by Yale Professor and Center for Science in the Public
Interest board member Kelley Brownell who first proposed the tax, is to
sharply increase
the cost of high-calorie foods so they will be priced out of reach."
(GuestChoice.com)
"GE
'vital' for treating haemophilia" - "New Zealand must
continue to make genetically altered therapies available to patients with
haemophilia and other genetic bleeding disorders, the royal commission
investigating the technology was told yesterday." (NZ
Herald)
"Biotechnology
ready to grow But critics would shuck it all, even the less-fatty fries"
- "With the first wave of genetically engineered foods -- crops with
built-in pesticides or herbicides -- biotech companies in the '90s focused on
farmers, promising to reduce the cost and labor of repeated applications of
chemicals. With the second wave now starting, many experts say they're hoping
to appeal to the rest of us. Genetically modified crops in development promise
better tasting, more nutritious and less expensive food. The new wave also
promises to bring plants that can produce pharmaceuticals and fuels."
(USA Today)
"Threat
that never was" - "A laboratory study
which suggested that GM crops harmed butterflies provoked protests across
Europe. Now environmentalists are having to backtrack. Mark Henderson
reports" (The Times)
"Gene
map will revolutionise farming" - "Thalecress is a weed
but it promises to trigger a new agricultural revolution: for the first time,
scientists have unravelled the complete DNA blueprint of a plant. Some 300
scientists across the world have spent £50m on a six-year hunt to identify
the 116m ``base pairs`` that make up the genetic code of Arabidopsis
thaliana, a cabbage relative. According to a report in the journal Nature,
researchers now have a toolkit with which to understand the planet`s huge
array of flowering plants. The information has been placed in a public
database, free to researchers everywhere." (Guardian)
"Protesters
at French Biotech Talks" - "MONTPELLIER, France --
Greenpeace activists dumped tons of genetically modified soy meal onto a U.S.
flag on Wednesday at a protest outside a biotechnology conference in France.
The activists oppose the U.S. policy of exporting genetically modified crops,
which they say pose health risks." (AP)
"Biotech Is
Answer to, Not Cause of, Food Allergies" - "Where's that
talking Chihuahua when you need him? If he hadn’t been sent to the old dogs
home with Benji and Spuds Mackenzie, he’d be shaking his head at the furor
over Aventis’ StarLink corn and saying, "Drop the baloney!"
(Michael Fumento)
"Italian
Scientists Blast GMO Restrictions" - "COPENHAGEN--While
plant scientists around the world celebrate the complete sequence of the
genome of the mustardlike plant Arabidopsis thaliana (see p. 2054),
embattled colleagues in Italy are protesting new rules that bar all field
trials involving genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The researchers hope
to turn the prevailing tide by bringing their plight to the attention of
colleagues around the world and exerting pressure on their government through
a petition drive." (Science)
"Analysis:
Victory sends tremors through Europe" - "... European
leaders will be worried by Bush’s allegedly robust views on such issues such
as global warming and climate change following the rows between the United
States and the Europeans at the recent Hague conference, which broke up in
acrimony. Al Gore had a reputation to defend as an environmental enthusiast,
and although American politicians tangle with the gas-guzzling U.S. lifestyle
at their peril, Europeans would have expected him to be more co-operative than
Bush in seeking a compromise on greenhouse gases." (CNN)
The world has much to be grateful for in the
7:2 non-partisan decision of the Supreme Court. [The
partisanship myth] [Landslide
Bush]
"Generators
of the electricity mess" - "Windmills and candles and warm
woolen mittens. Staticky sparks from the fur of small kittens. Campfires and
solar panels and thermal paddings. These are a few of the favorite things that
radical environmentalists would rather rely on for warmth, light, and
electricity than the modern power plant. To the delight of eco-Luddites,
energy shortages in California and the Pacific Northwest are forcing residents
to live like 17th-century peasants." (Michelle Malkin, Washington Times)
"African
Countries Commended For Ozone Layer Protection" - "The
Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, Dr. Klaus
Topfer, Tuesday night officiated at the launch of a prospectus paying tribute
to African countries, parties to the Montreal protocol, international
organisations and bilateral partners. Titled "Model of success: Africa
and the Montreal Protocol", the pamphlet enumerates Africa's
accomplishments within the framework of the fight against substances that
deplete the ozone layer." (PANA)
Tðpfer is the very same whacko expecting
the planet to go to water wars in the near-future ("the next
war in the world will be not idealogical, it will be linked with water").
Here he is, lauding Africa's delusion in wasting effort on the completely
irrelevant rather than addressing real and pressing problems. Figures...
A few warming proselytisers have been writing, taking me to task for my
scepticism over enhanced greenhouse and most particularly for my assertions
that atmospheric carbon is a precious resource for the biosphere and that warmer is
better than colder. A common theme has been the 'decimation' of fisheries due
to purported warming. Well, in August, with the reported warming of the North
Atlantic, came Large
increase in Scottish salmon numbers reported while New
cool-water cycle in Pacific sends marine populations soaring. These
harvestable (adult) fish in the Pacific north-east didn't suddenly materialise
out of cool water so, where did they come from? Could it be that breeding
success and survival was enhanced by warmer conditions? No one
would deny the El Niño-induced warming of the central Pacific 1997-98 and yet
fisheries boomed in the Pacific north-east and now:
"Poor
world prices for tuna force some fishing fleets back to harbour"
- "Poor world prices for tuna have forced some pacific island fishing
fleets back to harbour. Sean Dorney reports that the problem is world
oversupply: The Pacific newsagency, PacNews, is carrying a report out of
American Samoa saying the oil dock at Utulei and the docks at both fishing
canneries in Pago Pago are crowded with fishing boats which have been tied up
for several weeks. It says it's a depressing period for Samoan fishermen with
locally based purse seiner and long liner crews taking unscheduled leave
without pay. The news service quotes the Star Kist Manager in American Samoa,
Phil Thirkell, as saying tuna prices have fallen to an all-time low with the
price of skipjack taking the biggest drop. It's a similar scene elsewhere in
the Pacific. The Forum Fisheries Agency says prices have been falling since
last year due to big catches in all fisheries especially in the Eastern
Pacific. In its latest annual report the Agency says prices are likely to
remain low while markets are oversupplied." (Radio Australia)
Following the warmer conditions there is an oversupply of fish. Could
the two events be related? Of course, see El
Niño's Dramatic Impact on Ocean Biology for some idea on the enormous
surge in phytoplankton that took place with the El Niño rebound - that's a
lot of fish food. Incidentally, that bloom consumed an extraordinary amount of
carbon and the majority of that bloom (that which didn't end up as part of the
food chain at least) is now on the bottom of the Pacific - sequestered, in
other words.
It is entirely possible that warmer conditions enhance fish breeding
success, just as it seems likely that infusions of nutrient-rich cold currents
enhance fish growth. It is simply not true to say that warm = bad. Nor is it
true that there is any advantage for life on Earth in limiting the
availability of the essential trace gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).
Sorry fellas, but your assertion that available carbon is somehow bad
for carbon-based life forms, well... stinks. Even if increased carbon
availability were to lead to warming (unfortunately, a highly implausible
hypothesis) this would be greatly preferable to life-unfriendly cooling.
"Finally
someone has brought the climate change debate back down to Earth"
- "Ottawa Talks Can’t Break Ice Jam; What Happens When You Run Out of
Emissions Credits?; IEA Predicts Rising Energy Use; CO2 Demoted as
Climate Driver; Sun Elevated as Climate Driver; Cold November" (The
Cooler Heads Coalition)
Well lookit: "Climate
Change Could Cause Major Changes in U.S. Ecosystems" -
"Washington, Dec. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Global climate change will cause
major changes in natural ecosystems -- and the plants and animal communities
that make up these ecosystems -- across the United States, according to a
report released today by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change." (Pew
Center for Generating Climate Claptrap)
The PCGCC is proliferating more bizarre (and completely
baseless) scare stories. Imagine that...
"Antarctic
Ice Tongue Disintegrating" - "The Ninnis Ice Tongue, 350
square miles (900 square kilometers) of floating ice extending into the Indian
Ocean, has broken off the edge of the continent and is slowly disintegrating.
... An ice tongue occurs when a glacier flows out into the sea, forming a mass
of permanent ice that is essentially floating while at the same time attached
to the land. There is no evidence linking the demise of the Ninnis Glacier
Tongue to warming in the region. "The disintegration is likely to be the
consequence of a natural progression of events that periodically occur in
floating glacier tongues around the margin of the Antarctic Ice
Sheet," says Rob Massom, in a NASA report. "What remains a mystery
is why these breakouts occur." (National Geographic)
In a significant improvement over recent reporting,
National Geographic notes that the Ninnis was severely overextended and has
simply broken back to a more 'normal' profile, while the adjacent Mertz is
still growing. No 'global warming' symptoms here.
More 'global warming' disasters? "SWEEPING
WINTER STORMS CONFIRM RETURN TO COLDER WINTER" - "December
14, 2000 — In October, NOAA forecasters
warned that the winter
of 2000-2001 would be colder than the past three years of relatively mild
winters. Last week brought confirmation of this forecast, as Arctic cold swept
through the Midwest and Southern Plains, bringing record low temperatures,
snow and ice that paralyzed transportation and caused eight deaths. High
winds, snow and ice raked the Northeastern United States, while the
Mid-Atlantic region escaped with just a day of sleet and freezing rain."
(NOAA)
December 14, 2000
Chasing test tube-pure air: "Deadly
Breath" - "WEDNESDAY, Dec. 13 --
The red sky at night that gives sailors delight is hardly good news for land
lubbers. So say Baltimore scientists, who've shown that daily spikes in the
amount of fine particle pollution -- one reason for color wheel sunsets -- are
an important source of death from lung and heart diseases." (HealthScout) [Samet
et al, NEJM]
"Particulate
Air Pollution and Mortality -- Clearing the Air" - [As well as
noting the significant improvement in US urban air quality over recent decades]
"... Although substantial reductions can be achieved at a reasonable cost,
a reduction in 24-hour exposures to levels consistently below the current range
would be prohibitively costly, if not impossible, in the foreseeable
future." (NEJM editorial)
"First
plant genome completed" - "A multi-national research team
reports the completion of the Arabidopsis genome in the December 14, 2000,
issue of Nature." (UCMC)
"Biotech
Sees Riches in Weed's Genetic Secrets" - "LONDON - Biotech
firms hope the genetic secrets of a humble weed will revolutionize crop
production in the same way that mapping the human genome is transforming
medicine. The completion of the first gene map of a plant, the weed
Arabidopsis thaliana, or Thale cress, promises to speed the development of a
new generation of higher yielding and better tasting genetically modified
crops." (Reuters)
"Fishing
for Clues" - "The genetic map of the lowly fugu could help
scientists decipher the human blueprint" (San Francisco Chronicle)
"Greenpeace
Targets Ships Carrying GM Soybeans" - "AMSTERDAM
(Reuters) - Environmental group Greenpeace warned shippers on Wednesday it was
likely to block more vessels carrying genetically modified (GM) soybeans to
European animal feed producers. Italian Greenpeace activists said on Wednesday
they had held up a ship carrying GM soybeans headed for Venice, after similar
blockades in France and Belgium in recent weeks." (Reuters)
"Environmental
Concern Or Marketing Plan?" - "Greenpeace's unwarranted
genetically improved foods fear mongering has so upset consumers that many of
them will buy only organic food products. Greenpeace is stepping in to fill
the organic demand it created with its own line of organic products, on sale
now in Brazil. Don't be surprised to see Greenpeace products on a supermarket
shelf near you soon. ("Greenpeace to license organic products in
Brazil," Agence France Presse, 12/12/00)" (GuestChoice.com)
New SCOPE forum: "The
Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Food" (Science
Controversies On-Line: Partnerships in Education (SCOPE))
"Gardenburger
Announces Move to Non-Genetically Altered Soy" - "PORTLAND,
Ore., Dec. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Gardenburger Inc. announced today that it has
begun making its famous Gardenburger® meat alternative products with
traditional soybeans unaltered by genetic engineering, known as ``non-GMO''
soy. Gardenburger Inc. is the only food company among the major veggie burger
producers to make such a commitment to consumers." (PRN)
Despite the
fortuitous demise of UNFCCC CoP6 (The Hague), we are still being deluged with
enhanced greenhouse scare pieces of varied ilk. In case you were wondering why -
the reason is quite simple - the warming advocacy groups are desperately trying
to stitch something together for the Clinton-Gore administration to sign on to
before Dub-yah gets control of the Presidential Seal. We had CoP6, CoP6 I(a) (at
the Euro conference) and here's attempts to set up CoP6 I(b) (CoP6 II is to be
held next May or June to set up for CoP7):
"Norway
could host climate talks before Christmas" - "Norway may host
top-level climate talks before Christmas to try to salvage a pact to curb global
warning after last month's failed negotiations in The Hague, the Environment
Ministry said today. The Ministry's information chief, Eva Nordvik, told Reuters
that the so-called "umbrella group" — the United States, Canada,
Australia, New Zealand — and the European Union have been invited to attend a
meeting in Oslo." (Reuters)
But wait, there's more:
"Climate
talks fail to reach agreement" - "Hopes of new climate talks
that would bring Australia, the European Union, the United States, Canada and
Japan to a negotiating table in Oslo have reportedly ended. The German magazine Der
Spiegel says efforts to flesh out measures to battle global warming have
floundered, after video conference involving representatives of the nations
involved fell apart." (ABC News Online)
For some reason people just won't go for devastating
their economies and slashing standards of living to make poverty universal, so
more scares are obviously in order:
"Global
Warming Greater minus El Ninos, Volcanoes" — Removing the masking effects of volcanic
eruptions and El Nino events from the global mean temperature record reveals a
more gradual and yet stronger global warming trend over the last century,
according to a new analysis by Tom Wigley, a climate expert at the National
Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The analysis supports scientists' claim
that human activity is influencing the earth's climate. The findings are
published in the December 15 issue of Geophysical Research Letters. NCAR's
primary sponsor is the National Science Foundation." (UCAR)
Tom Wigley recycles 'aerosol cooling masking warming'
that models insist should be but the world refuses to produce. Strangely
concurrent with PCGCC's latest 'lethal warming' piece (see below) - PCGCC
sponsored Tom's last 'the-warming's-there-we-just-can't-detect-it' effort.
'Lethal' warming: "Warming
May Pose Risks to Human Health, Report Finds" - "Washington,
D.C.- Global climate change may exacerbate health risks for the elderly, the
infirm, and the poor - although there is substantial capacity to reduce these
risks - according to a new report commissioned by the Pew Center on Global
Climate Change. And while the study finds that over the next few decades the
United States may have sufficient resources to prevent the worst possibilities,
poorer countries may not fare as well." (Pew Center for Generating Climate
Claptrap)
Really? Rather topically, among the reviews released
today by co2science.org, we find:
"Temperature
Effects on Coronary Death in a Mild Climate" - "This study
provides further support for the growing body of evidence that indicates that
cooler weather is more conducive to the occurrence of death due to coronary
artery disease than is warmer weather, even in a climate where it does not get
very cold. Hence, it naturally follows that global warming, if it occurs in the
future, is likely to be beneficial to much of humanity by reducing the incidence
of death due to coronary artery disease, which is a major cause of death the
world over." (co2science.org)
Global warming to kill reefs: "Reef
experts sound warning, U.S. takes new protections" - "Report
predicts 70 percent could die by 2050" (MSNBC)
Ozone 'depletion': "Frying
fish" - "UV light could be cooking cod larvae to death"
(New Scientist)
See comments under yesterday's item "The Incredible
Shrinking Ozone Hole"
Rising sea levels - again: "Lawyers
help island nations keep afloat" - "As they battle for
insurance payouts for all the floods of the past few months, the inhabitants of
Uxbridge, Middlesex, might spare a thought for the people of Samoa. On small
islands like this, and others including the Maldives and Marshall Islands, there
is more than just insurance at stake. In this location global warming could mean
islands being so swamped they disappear." (Guardian)
Brewing dot.bomb: "Investors
warm to climate change theme" - "The failure of last month's
Hague conference to reach agreement on measures to reduce climate change will do
little to reduce the worldwide importance of the issue, now that a consensus
seems to have emerged that climate change is happening and that human factors
are behind it." (Reuters)
See yesterday's comments under "Down to earth"
for more on the so-called 'climate consensus.' While we certainly do not yet
have the data or anything like the predictive skills to make confident
statements about what is likely in a few months, let alone a half-century
hence, current conditions suggest a slightly enhanced probability of another
period of global cooling, possibly of 2-3 decades duration. Significant
cooling, back into a major glaciation, is certainly likely in a scant few
millennia.
"Capping
carbon" - "Over vast stretches of geologic time, earth has
evolved ways to swap its treasure trove of carbon among various
"accounts": the atmosphere, oceans, land surfaces - and even hoarded
deep beneath its crust." [Algae
at the climatic Rubicon] (CSM)
Despite (correctly) calling carbon Earth's "treasure
trove," CSM then rabbits on about ways to lock away this marvellous
resource. One point always omitted in the current drive to reclassify an
essential trace gas (CO2) as a 'pollutant' is that the carbon
causing so much concern, that liberated by humans through combustion of fossil
fuels, came originally from the atmosphere and has long been denied life on
Earth. That we are returning it to availability is good for the biosphere.
This is a 'pollutant' there should be more of.
"Will
Global Warming Devastate Crops? Read All About It!"
- "Every once in a while - much more often, in fact, than one would hope
would be the case - a great hue and cry is raised over an experimental finding
reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Worse than that, much is
often made of an isolated report in a non-referred science magazine.
There are even cases where word-of-mouth accounts of research that has not yet
been submitted for publication, much less even written in a
suitable format for journal review, make their way into the news services.
And all of a sudden, the dramatic new finding - based on only the claims of
its authors - becomes the mantra of some pre-existing movement (such as the
Climate Alarmist Craze) that realizes how the new information can be used to
promote its own agenda." (co2science.org)
"Solar
Variability and Climate Change" - "Current global warming
commonly is attributed to increased CO2 concentrations
in the atmosphere," the authors note. "However," they
continue, "geophysical, archaeological, and historical evidence is
consistent with warming and cooling periods during the Holocene as indicated
by the solar-output model." They therefore conclude that the idea
of "the modern temperature increase being caused solely by an increase in
CO2 concentrations appears questionable."
Their findings also clearly suggest that as far as humankind is concerned,
warmer is better." (co2science.org)
December 13, 2000
"LIFESAVING
CHEMICAL ESCAPES UNITED NATIONS BAN"
- "Washington, DC, December 11, 2000 - An international coalition of public
health and advocacy groups applauded United Nations' recent vote against
erecting a global ban on the pesticide DDT. "This decision is a great
victory for public health," said Dr. Don Roberts, a tropical disease expert
and spokesman for the Save Children From Malaria Campaign. "It will help
blunt the devastating re-emergence of killer diseases like malaria and should
save the lives of millions of people in the next decade alone." (FightingMalaria.org)
"Clean
Up Hudson River PCBs Now, Congressman, Local Residents Demand" — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
today began asking for comments on its plan to remove toxic PCBs from the Hudson
River, and local residents responded with a cry to clean it up now. Despite a
massive public-relations blitz by General Electric, which dumped the PCBs into
the river, residents are demanding the company remove the cancer-causing
chemicals from the Hudson." (Sierra Club)
Why? Renate Kimbrough, who, perhaps rightly from the
results she had back in 1975, initially raised a flag of concern over PCBs,
has since done significantly larger studies and found no cause for concern.
See Fear no more;
Study finds
little risk from PCBs; An
Earth Day Lesson; Study
shows no PCB-cancer correlation. There's never been any evidence of
harm from PCBs save perhaps transient eye and skin irritation, merely a
precautionary alarm to which virtually everybody overreacted. Even if PCBs
were harmful, stirring them from where they are being entombed in river silt
is hardly a sensible act. This is not an environment issue - it's an
ideological attack on a large corporation simply because they are a
large corporation. To launch a half-billion-dollar's worth of vandalism on a
river system because you don't like a corporation that acted perfectly legally
at the time is the height of stupidity.
"Doubts
about handling toxic pesticide grow" - "The federal
government's move to ban diazinon, a common pesticide, by 2003 while not
encouraging its disposal has generated doubt about the proper way to handle the
toxic household substance. ... But the agency said consumers do not need to get
rid of diazinon that might be in the house or garage. As long as products with
diazinon are properly handled, the agency said, they pose no immediate
danger." (The Oregonian)
Well if there's no danger from properly handled diazinon
- and there certainly is no evidence otherwise - why ban it to begin with?
It's been safely used since the 50s but now people can't be exposed to it -
unless they've already bought it, in which case it's still safe to use.
Right...
"Coffee-and-cigarettes
combo seen fighting off cancer" - "LONDON - Drinking coffee
regularly may play a role in protecting smokers from bladder cancer, a new study
suggests. Researchers found that bladder cancer was about half as likely to
occur in smokers who regularly drank coffee as in smokers who did not.
"This could suggest that the coffee consumption modifies the effect of
tobacco smoking," said Dr. Gonzalo Lopez-Abente, the Spanish researcher who
led the study, published this week in the London-based Journal of
Epidemiology and Community Health." (AP) [BBC
Online]
"Maryland
county upholds outdoor smoking ban" - "ROCKVILLE, Md. - A
county council narrowly approved the toughest outdoor smoking restriction in the
nation Tuesday, upholding a community's plan to impose $100 fine for smoking or
discarding cigarettes in public areas." (AP)
"False
scientific research 'endangering the public'"
- "Doctors are fabricating research results to win grants and advance their
careers but the medical establishment is failing to protect the public from the
menace of these scientific frauds, a committee of medical editors said yesterday
Eighty cases of fraudulent research have been detected in the past four years,
and 30 have been investigated in the past year. Many individuals and
institutions are driven by the need for recognition. In some cases, institutions
have covered up wrongdoing to protect reputations but it is patients and,
ultimately, science itself that will be the losers if public trust in research
is undermined, the Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope) said."
(Independent)
Uh-huh... "Tempers
Flare at Environmental Justice Conference" - "ARLINGTON,
Virginia, December 12, 2000 - Members of a federal government advisory panel
today lambasted President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency for failing to aggressively combat the scourge
of "environmental racism" that they maintain is afflicting many poor
communities and communities of color." (ENS)
You don't suppose variation in things like cancer
survival rates may have something to do with genuine physiological
differences:
"Protein
linked to prostate cancer risk in black men" - "SAN FRANCISCO:
The prostate tumours found in black men have more than 20 times the level of a
certain cancer-promoting substance as the tumours found in white men,
researchers reported at the American Society for Cell Biology meeting
here." (Times of India)
"Clinton
leaves his mark on landscape" - "President has protected some
5 million acres, angering property-rights advocates." (CSM)
Hmm... 'mark' - that's another word for 'blight' isn't
it?
"Altered
Gene Linked to Allergic Reactions And Asthma" - "NEW YORK -
People with allergies and asthma are more likely than their peers to have a
specific variation in the gene for a cell-signaling chemical, researchers
report. The chemical is known as RANTES, and it binds to the surface of immune
cells and can attract the cells to sites of inflammation in the body. In a new
study, Dr. Ali Hajeer from the University of Manchester, UK, and associates
found that a certain variation in a RANTES-associated gene was more common in
the allergy-prone compared with those who are allergy-free. The gene was also
associated with lung obstruction, an indicator of asthma. Those with two copies
of the genetic variant--one from each parent--were more than six times as likely
to have moderate to severe airway obstruction than those with one copy or no
copy." (Reuters Health)
So, is the observed increase in asthma incidence an
artefact of increased environmental irritants or rather one of dramatically
increased breeding success of those with defective gene copies due to improved
environment and medical support? Think about it.
"Exciting
Challenges For Food Scientists" - "The United Nations
estimates that 800 million people around the world are under-nourished, 400
million women of child bearing age are iron deficient and about 100 million
children suffer from vitamin A deficiency which is a leading cause of
blindness." (New Straits Times)
"Biotech
wheat goes under the microscope" - "Wheat is the world's
most widely eaten food grain and the top grain traded internationally. It's a
main crop in Oregon, where the wheat grown is the product of decades of
cross-breeding and tinkering by researchers at public land-grant universities.
Now, wheat produced through genetic engineering is on the horizon in the
Northwest." [OREGON'S
POTATO CROP] (The Oregonian)
'Indian BT
cotton seeds have no ill-effect on goats' - "NEW DELHI: Studies
conducted by government agencies on Indian BT cotton seeds indicate that there
is no ill-effect on goats while such studies are underway on lactating cows,
buffalos, poultry and fish. According to official sources, the commercial
release of the seeds would be considered on completion of the studies."
(Times of India)
"Global
Meeting Defines Biosafety Measures" - "MONTPELLIER, France,
December 12, 2000 - With concerns over genetically modified foods unabated
around the world, officials from the 177 member governments of the Convention
on Biological Diversity are meeting in Montpellier to discuss practical steps
for minimizing some of the potential risks of biotechnology. The negotiators
on the Intergovernmental Committee for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (ICCP)
convened yesterday and will continue talks through Friday." (ENS)
"Argentine
GM policy endangers investment - Monsanto" - "BUENOS AIRES -
Agribusiness giant Monsanto Co may close some operations in Argentina if the
government does not loosen restrictions on genetically modified (GM) food
production, a company official said. Argentina's policy of authorizing new GM
products only if they have been approved in European Union endangers
Monsanto's projects including an $8 million cotton seed processing plant joint
venture, said Miguel Potocnik, Monsanto's agriculture director for southern
Latin America." (Reuters)
"European
Greens Propel Agreement on GMO Release Law" - "BRUSSELS,
Belgium, December 12, 2000 - The European Parliament and Council of Ministers
have agreed on revisions to the European Union law on deliberate release into
the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) after what have been
described as heated conciliation talks." (ENS)
"Climatologist:
'La Nina is Back'" - "Iowa State University climatologist
Elwynn Taylor reports the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) in early December
has exceeded the previous high set in January 1999. As a result, Taylor says
the Midwest could see extra moisture over the winter, especially in the
eastern portion of the Belt." (AgWeb.com)
"Down
to earth" - "THE recent failure by
governments gathered in The Hague to reach agreement on carbon emissions to
contain global warming has fuelled a general scepticism about international
treaties to protect the environment. The climate talks flowed directly from the
Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit of 1992, and highlighted the fact that many worthy
initiatives emanating from that landmark event have come to nothing."
(Business Day)
Hmm... may have more to do with the simple fact that the
warm and fuzzy ideals of the Earth Summit are couched neither in practicality
nor sound science. So atrocious and misguided were the aims and ideals that The
Heidelberg Appeal was publicly released at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de
Janeiro. By the end of the 1992 summit, 425 scientists and other intellectual
leaders had signed the appeal. Since then, word of mouth has prompted hundreds
more scientists to lend their support. As at Earth Day 1996, more than 2,700
signatories, including dozens of Nobel Prize winners, from 102 countries had
signed the appeal. By 1995 this was joined by the LEIPZIG
DECLARATION ON GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE and, later, the Anti-Global
Warming Petition, now endorsed by nearly 20,000 scientists from around the
globe. So much for the great 'climate consensus.'
If science and scientists are not really driving this,
what is? Perhaps this quote offers a clue: "Isn't the only hope
for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn't it our
responsibility to bring that about?" -- Maurice Strong, head
of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and Executive Officer for Reform in
the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nations. Science? Looks
like zealotry to me.
"Global
warming's hot air balloons" - "How strong is the U.S.
economy? One telling sign is that months of climbing gas prices have produced
only grumbles from American motorists. But let's say prices start soaring
again, until they surpass $3 or $4 a gallon. Would the complaints grow louder?
Of course they would. That is why consumers ought to be glad that efforts to
amend a treaty that would severely limit the "greenhouse gases"
thought to fuel global warming went down in flames at a recent United Nations
conference in The Hague." (Angela Antonelli, Washington Times)
"Europe
can't kick nuclear habit" - "Atomic power gains
post-Chernobyl life as clean alternative to fossil fuels" (Ottawa
Citizen)
Big deal of the day: "The
Incredible Shrinking Ozone Hole" - "December 12, 2000 -- After
reaching a record-breaking size in mid-September, the ozone hole over Antarctica
has made a surprisingly hasty retreat, disappearing completely by November 19,
NASA scientists said. The ozone hole waxes and wanes with the seasons every
year, slowly vanishing as the Southern Hemisphere reaches the peak of its
summer." (NASA)
The Antarctic Ozone Anomaly appears every spring and
disappears by mid-summer - how incredible is that? Earth Probe TOMS images are
archived here, dating
back to late July 1996. Choose any interval you like, six monthly, quarterly
(provides perhaps the best quick overview), monthly or whatever and check back
through the archive to see just how variable is Earth's conceptual 'ozone
layer.' At the same time as 'depletion events' occur, the temperate zone in
the same hemisphere exhibits truly extraordinary ozone density. Depletion or
displacement? If it's depletion then the adjacent zone is producing one
hellovalotta ozone at the same time. Plenty of people have tried to make an
issue out of the annual anomaly but its relevance to life on Earth is
negligible at most. Nobody sunbathes at the South Pole at the end of winter
and UV strengths penetrating the 'hole' are really quite mild compared with
the equatorial zone on any normal day. Ozone levels at the depths of the
'hole' are not greatly different from 'normal' autumn levels and UV
penetration is virtually indistinguishable. An interesting phenomenon from a
scientific viewpoint but certainly nothing for the wider public to get excited
about for it has absolutely no bearing on the man in the street.
December 12, 2000
"Who Says
PCBs Cause Cancer?" - "The EPA's assertion that PCBs in fish
pose a human cancer risk is based solely on observations that high-dose,
prolonged PCB exposure causes tumors in laboratory animals. But this is very
different from the question at hand: Is there any evidence that the traces of
PCBs in Hudson River fish increase the risk of cancer in humans? The EPA, an
environmental regulatory agency, isn't known for its competency in the
scientific discipline of cancer causation. We therefore need to turn elsewhere
for expert opinions on any causal relationship between PCBs and cancer."
(Elizabeth Whelan in the Wall Street Journal)
"Scientists
discover new stage in malarial infection" - "St. Louis, Dec.
11, 2000 -- Researchers have identified a previously unknown step that enables
the malaria parasite to spread in the bloodstream. And they have found a way
to block this key event. The findings, reported in the Dec. 12 online edition
of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, may lead to promising
targets for drug development. Malaria afflicts 300 to 500 million people
worldwide and kills nearly 2 million children each year. The parasites that
cause the disease multiply inside red blood cells, bursting from them to
invade new cells." (WUSM) [HHMI
release]
"New
Treaty Bans or Limits 12 Most Toxic Chemicals" -
"JOHANNESBURG, South Africa, December 11, 2000 - After a week of
deliberations to ban the world's most toxic chemicals, delegates have reached
an agreement, which "constitutes a declaration of war on persistent
organic pollutants," said conference chairman John Buccini. ... DDT has
been exempted because it is still needed in many countries to fight malarial
mosquitoes. The aim is to allow countries to protect against malaria until
they are able to replace DDT with green alternatives." (ENS)
"Final
report from the POPs convention" - "... The US compromised
slightly on the "precautionary principle" language. This will
probably have the broadest implications for the convention, since new
chemicals will be listed more easily than with a science-based assessment.
Manufacturers of other potential POPs will be looking over their shoulders in
the coming months/years." (Roger Bate, FightingMalaria.org)
Natchural [wheeze] idn't beddah? "Researchers
link mice to inner-city asthma" - "BALTIMORE, Maryland --
Common house mice may be a major contributor to asthma among inner-city
children, according to scientists at Johns Hopkins University. ... For years,
researchers have known that cats, dogs, dust mites and cockroaches can cause
allergies that trigger the wheezing and constricted air passages of asthma.
"While cockroach is the more important allergen, mouse is second in
line," said Dr. Robert Wood, associate professor of pediatrics at Johns
Hopkins and the study's lead investigator." (AP) [Johns
Hopkins release] [HealthScout]
Isn't it funny how juvenile asthma is rising in
apparently inverse proportion with decades of restrictions and outright bans
on synthetic pesticides. These restrictions and bans are for our health you
say?
"Kids get
marching orders" - "PARENTS should be forced to drop kids off
hundreds of metres from the school gates to help them shed weight, a child
obesity conference was told yesterday. ... The obesity conference at a Sydney
hospital also heard the demise of the see-saw, slippery dip and roundabout
partly explained the increase in the number of chubby children. Outdated and
boring council-run playgrounds were breeding inactivity, adolescent health
expert Dr Michael Booth said. The high cost of litigation was also discouraging
councils from investing in playgrounds." (Herald Sun)
You mean actually letting kids play fun games, even at
risk of bumps, scrapes and the odd breakage may actually be good for them?
Imagine that...
"Coffee
Fails Gall Bladder Test" -
"MONDAY, Dec. 11 -- Drinking java to ward off gallstones? Hold off on that
second cup, says a new study. It suggests that coffee doesn't stop the gall
bladder from forming stones, despite earlier studies showing the opposite. A
report on the finding appears in the latest issue of the American Journal of
Epidemiology." (HealthScout)
Hmm... gotta admit that gallstones are the last thing on
my mind when reaching for my bottomless cuppa but - each to their own...
"Talks
On For Golden Rice Tech Transfer" - "'Golden rice', the
genetically-engineered rice fortified with Vitamin A on which agrochemical
multinationals hold patents, has raked up a controversy with environmental
activists questioning the Government's moves to bring the technology to India.
The Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and the Indian Council of Agricultural
Research (ICAR) had held a series of meetings with both the Swiss and German
team of inventors with a view to formalising a technology transfer
agreement." (Hindu Business Line)
"Gene-Altered
Corn Changes Dynamics of Grain Industry" - "CEDAR RAPIDS,
Iowa — At the Archer Daniels Midland Company's plant these days, the
arriving truckloads of No. 2 yellow corn all need to pass the same test: they
are checked for odor, damage, moisture, and something called Cry9C." (NY
Times)
"Biotech's
Glories" - "To the anti-technologists who probably would
consider Louis Pasteur a dangerous madman if he were around today, few menaces
loom larger than biotechnology. To the starving and malnourished souls in the
Third World, few promises offer so much hope." (Richmond Times Dispatch)
"The
Green Peril" - "While the green movement claims to have the
future of the planet in mind, economist Deepak Lal warned of the new
imperialist threat posed by the ecological movement, particularly for the
developing countries. Prof.. Lal, who is the James Coleman Professor of
International Development Studies at the University of California, at Los
Angeles, USA, was delivering the inaugural Julian L. Simon Memorial Lecture
organised by Liberty Institute, in New Delhi, on Saturday." (Liberty
Institute)
"Rip
it up" - "A wind chill of minus-17 degrees greeted senior
environmental officials from the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan and the
South Pacific in Ottawa last Wednesday as they went behind closed doors for
two days of talks to try to reignite burned-out negotiations to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. Over the next week, more talks are expected in Oslo,
Norway. The aim appears to be an agreement in time for French President
Jacques Chirac's meeting with President Clinton when they meet in Washington
Dec. 18. But it would be far better for Mr. Clinton's legacy — and the world
economy — if no deal is reached. And, even if one is struck, the reception
of Congress would be far chillier than the winds of Ottawa." (James K
Glassman, Washington Times)
Sigh! The Indy still can't
let go on 'global warming': "Now
the blame's on Nao – our own El Niño, but more peculiar"
- "Britain's stormy recent months have partly
been caused by our own El Niño, the Meteorological Office said yesterday. It
believes that a mysterious Atlantic "cousin" of the notorious
Pacific weather system has been responsible for the wettest autumn on record,
together with short term blockages in weather patterns and global
warming." (Independent)
"VIRTUAL
CLIMATE ALERT #42" - "Talk about power of the press! Newsweek’s
senior science and environment editor Sharon Begley is intent upon repeal
of the First Law of Thermodynamics: the law of physics that dictates heating
things up causes warming. Begley repeats in the December 4, 2000, edition the
star turn first evident in her cover story in the January 22, 1996, edition.
You’ll recall that 1996 cover. "THE HOT ZONE" it screamed. It
showed some poor soul stumbling, head-down, gloveless hand on hat into the
teeth of a raging blizzard. The sub-head said it all, "Blizzards, Floods
and Hurricanes: Blame Global Warming." Now, Newsweek’s
readership is warned (hold onto your hat again, fella) global warming will
cause an Ice Age!" (GES)
"VIRTUAL
CLIMATE ALERT #43" - "For an environmental press demanding
of peer-reviewed science as the platinum standard in all things climate
related, it’s payback time. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Services
(IFAS) at the University of Florida leads a recent press release with,
"Temperature increases anticipated as part of global warming appear to
significantly reduce rice yields, a finding that has worrisome implications
for the third of the world’s population that relies on rice as a primary
staple." Well, there you have it! Or do you?" (GES)
December 11, 2000
Stupid celebrity of the day: Pierce
Brosnan: '007' or just '000'? - "The illnesses that we suffer come from
the air and the food and what we breathe, our environment," says James
Bond-actor Pierce Brosnan in People (Dec. 18). Brosnan will be honored
later this month at the Environmental Media Awards.
"Treaty curbing
chemicals is drafted" - "JOHANNESBURG, Dec. 10 — Negotiators
for 122 nations reached an agreement for a phased-in, global ban on PCBs and
other highly toxic chemicals early Sunday after extending a final U.N. summit on
the issue into a seventh day with all-night talks. ... ‘It is a possibility
that this could lead to a higher cost. For example, manufacturing factories are
going to have to address reduction of releases of dioxins and furans.’ —
JOHN BUCCINI, Summit chairman" (AP) [BBC
Online] [Reuters]
[The Times]
Uh-huh... and who's going to bear the pain over release
of dioxins and furans emitted by forest fires, stubble burning, domestic wood
fires, volcanoes... All irrelevant and all headed for UN 'control.' Bizarre!
At least essential use of DDT was not banned outright,
although 'precautionary' wording was slipped into the text. It will be
interesting to see if sufficient countries come to their senses over the next
5 years to ensure the stupid thing isn't sufficiently ratified to bring it
into force.
"Greenpeace
applauds NZ move at toxin conference" - "... Greenpeace is
monitoring the conference, its spokeswoman Sue Connor says the goal of a
worldwide ban on dioxins is now in sight." (NZ Herald)
Really? Australia's emissions inventory shows
three-fourths of dioxins emitted by wildfires. What are you gonna do? Issue Ma
Nature with a summons? Geeez!
"Coffee
Consumption and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Death" -
"Conclusions: Coffee drinking does not increase the risk of CHD or
death. In men, slightly increased mortality from CHD and all causes in heavy
coffee drinkers is largely explained by the effects of smoking and a high serum
cholesterol level." [View
Full Text] (Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3393-3400)
That coffee consumption is not a significant coronary
heart disease (CHD) risk is not news, what is noteworthy is that a negative
correlation has been published. The normal publication bias is toward
allocation of culpability (substance X causes problem Y),
notification that X doesn't cause Y is
significantly less common - leading to the illusion that risks abound when, in
reality, the majority of studies don't indicate positive
association at all. Relax, the world's a much safer place now than it was a
hundred years ago and things are improving all the time. A big
pat on the head for AIM.
"Cell
shapes could amplify mobile phones' effect" - "The shape of
human cells can amplify the effect of mobile phone radiation on human tissue,
researchers reported today. Computer models used to explore the effects of
radiation from mobile phones have in the past treated cells as simple spheres.
But a Spanish team led by Professor Jose Luis Sebastian at the University
Complutense in Madrid has found that the intensity of electric fields induced
in cells is heightened when more realistic geometric shapes are used."
(ABC News Online)
Yeah, hurray. Every time I see could, might
or may in the heading I lose interest pretty quickly because it
really means something along the lines of "Fred (or whoever)
guesses something is a possibility but hasn't managed to demonstrate it."
It becomes science when said Fred demonstrates some supportive evidence for
their hypothesis. It becomes a theory when other
scientists in the same or related disciplines reproduce the same results and
it becomes established fact when the effect can be demonstrated
in a replicable manner. This piece falls into the category of
"Fred says..." Whoopee!
"Cleaning
up Hudson River: Who should foot the bill?" - "EPA and GE wage
a $460 million fight that may impact pollution cleanups nationwide." (CSM)
Actually, the heart of the matter is whether there is any
sense in the proposed action at all. See Final
Countdown at EPA and Stirring
up Sleeping Dogs in the Hudson.
"Law
firm to launch 'economy class syndrome' class action" -
"Australian and international airlines could face damages bills exceeding
$100,000 for allegedly failing to warn passengers of the risk of flying
economy class. Ten Australians are taking legal action against Qantas, British
Airways, Air France and Air New Zealand." (ABC News Online) [AFP]
"Alarm
at spread of CJD" - "Evidence
has emerged that the human form of the brain-wasting illness BSE has spread
wider than previously thought, after reports that a 35-year-old South African
woman, who had never travelled abroad, died from the disease six months
ago." (Independent)
Oh, well - it really must be extra terrestrially sourced
then (see "Mad
cow disease may be extraterrestrial" from
the weekend's postings).
Homocysteine - the latest bad guy? "Can
a vitamin a day help keep heart disease away?" - "ANN ARBOR,
MI - The jury is still out on exactly how much benefit our hearts can get from
lowering the level of homocysteine in our blood. But that doesn't mean people
at risk for heart disease should wait for a verdict from big clinical trials
before having their levels tested and getting more homocysteine-lowering
nutrients, a new University of Michigan study finds." (UM) [BBC
Online]
Good junk, bad junk? "Pizza
Not Necessarily Nutritional No-No" - "... Pizza is an
acceptable food choice because you get almost every food group, except maybe
fruit -- and if you get a Hawaiian pizza, you even get that," says Connie
Diekman, a registered nurse at Washington University in St. Louis and a
spokeswoman for the American Dietary Association." (HealthScout)
"Ban
on import of oil from GM oilseeds likely" - "New Delhi :
The Union Agriculture Minister, Nitish Kumar said that the government is
considering to ban imports of edible oils made from genetically modified (GM)
soyabeans and other seeds. He said that this measure will stall dumping by some
producer countries that has adversely affected the Indian farmers. He said these
countries resort to dumping by taking undue advantage of the low WTO bound-rate
duty of 45 per cent for imported soyabean and rapeseed oils. All other oils
attracted a higher import duty of up to 300 per cent. The minister said much of
the soyabean oil coming from abroad was from genetically modified seeds."
(Indian Express)
GM issue or trade protectionism?
"Centre to
encourage research on GMOs" - "CALCUTTA: The Centre would
encourage research on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) but approval for
their commercial use would not be given unless the field trials yielded
satisfactory results. "We will encourage research on the GMOs. We have
allowed field trials on the transgenic plants. But approval for commercial use
of the same would be given only after the results of the trials are proved to
be beneficial for the farmers and the consumers," Dr S R Rao, director,
department of biotechnology under the Union ministry of Science and
Technology, told PTI here." (Times of India)
"Debating
the Food Debate, Two Views (1)" - "... The bottom line is
that not a single person is at all likely to be harmed by this product, which
differs from other commercial varieties by the presence of a Bacillus
thuringiensis protein called Cry9C. The foods in question are actually far
less likely than thousands of other products on the market to cause allergic
or other health problems. For example, fava beans, a fixture of upscale
restaurant cuisine in the United States and Europe, can be life-threatening to
persons with hereditary glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency; by
contrast, even after exhaustive testing, no allergic reactions, toxicity, or
any other problem has been demonstrated with Cry9C or any substance similar to
it." [Debating
the Food Debate, Two Views (2)] (The Scientist)
"Gene
technology and the environment" - "New research by CSIRO is
exploring the safety of genetically modified crops once they are released
commercially into the environment, a National Science Briefing was told in
Parliament House Canberra today (Dec 7)." (CSIRO)
December 9-10, 2000
"U.N.
Talks Close to Deal on Toxic Treaty" - "JOHANNESBURG -
Delegates from 122 countries were close to clinching a global agreement aimed
at curbing or banning some of the most dangerous pollutants on Earth, a United
Nations official said on Saturday." (Reuters) [SA
will continue use of DDT (Sapa) [Third
report; Fourth
report & Fifth
report by Roger Bate from the POPs convention]
"A
Wind-Borne Threat to Sierra Frogs" - "A study finds
that pesticides used on farms in the San Joaquin Valley damage the nervous
systems of amphibians in Yosemite and elsewhere." (LA Times' resident
whacko, Marla Cone)
Ms Cone manages to get quotes for toxic chemical drift
and even dredged up Andrew "the-ultraviolet's-gonna-get-us"
Blaustein for the old "ozone depletion" chestnut but curiously
omitted the main thrust of current research into frog population decline -
chytrid fungus. Perhaps that one's not popular as a target due to thought that
it may have been spread by eco-tourism and amphibian researchers themselves.
Another postulated mechanism for spread of amphibian pathogens has been the
boom in migratory bird populations and effort is underway to try to determine
whether declines are prevalent along migratory flight paths. There's another
rather embarrassing cause postulated for amphibian declines around the world -
the proliferation of gambusia (mosquito fish) as an "environmentally
friendly" alternative to pesticides - trouble is, the rotten things have
a taste for tadpole and these now-feral populations are decimating amphibians.
They're not the only introduced fish to find amphibians a tasty treat either,
stocking for recreational fishing has taken a severe toll too. Frog
deformities have been largely attributed to trematode (tiny parasitic
flatworm) infection. Ms Cone seems to have missed a couple of things.
"Mad
cow disease may be extraterrestrial" - "THE mad cow disease
could have come from outer space, according to two professors. Alien organisms
may have reached Earth among space debris from falling comets before being eaten
by grazing cattle, they say. Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe and Sir Fred Hoyle
put the blame for BSE on prions -- infected pieces of protein -- coming from
comets and meteor showers." (Sunday Telegraph (Aus))
Nope - I'm not saying a word.
"Britain
offers safety precautions for cell phones" - "LONDON - The
British government launched a package of safety precautions for cell phones
Friday. The package includes leaflets advising that children be discouraged from
using the handsets at all. ... The leaflets summarize the safety research to
date, saying experts have concluded that although no evidence exists that using
a cell phone causes brain tumors or other ill effects, a health risk cannot be
ruled out, particularly for children." (AP) [BBC
Online] [Telegraph]
[Hands-free
mobiles lose safety approval (The Times)] [Mobile
phone research fund about to hang up on genetic concerns (SMH)]
"Estrogen
may join carcinogen list Talc also under consideration; benefits don't play into
decision" - "Estrogen, used in hormone replacement therapy,
and talc are among the substances being considered for listing in the next
federal ''Report on Carcinogens,'' due in 2002. The only public meeting in the
review process will be next week in Washington." (USA Today)
"California
proposal puts brakes on electric-car proliferation" - "LOS
ANGELES - California regulators are concluding that the drive to cleaner air
shouldn't necessarily be in an electric car. In a move that alarmed
environmentalists but failed to placate automakers, staff for the state's
air-quality board Friday proposed to sharply scale back a rule that would put
thousands of battery-powered vehicles on California roads by 2003." (AP)
[NY Times]
"Only
One Side Of The Risk Equation" - "The precautionary
principle is increasingly being invoked as an approach that governments should
embrace to deal with risks, especially environmental and health risks arising
from new technology or new products. However, the precautionary principle
biases the process of "decision-making under uncertainty" against
the new. It is arbitrary, does not compare risks, and addresses only the risk
of innovation, not the risk of stagnation." (CID)
Well lookit: "Keep
GM tests in the lab, farmers warn" - "The benefits of gene
science are over-hyped and the rush to patent new technology is nothing more
than bio-piracy, the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification has been told.
Organic farmers put their case to the commission in Wellington this week, asking
that gene experiments be confined to the laboratory." [GM
labelling takes effect in 12 months] (NZ Herald)
What a surprise - organic farmers are afraid their
marketing illusion will fall down...
"Ecologically
grown foods not healthier" - "Ecologically
grown foods are not healthier nor safer than other foods, according to the
Norwegian Food Control Authority. The Authority is also of the opinion that
the benefit to the environment is minimal, Dagsavisen reports. It also points
out that ecological and ordinary foods are subject to the same standards for
food safety." (Norway Post)
"Regulator
to rule gene technology" - "SCIENTISTS involved in human
cloning risk 10-year jail terms and protesters two years' jail for damaging
genetically modified crops, under Australia's first gene laws passed by the
Senate. A Gene Technology Regulator will be set up with the same sweeping
powers as the federal police and the tax office to inspect laboratories and
farms for illegal GM activity." (The Australian) [Gene
crops subject to stricter controls (The Age)]
"A
Biotech Crop Risk Is Downgraded" - "Genetically engineered
crops pose little risk to monarch butterflies and may even benefit the
insects, scientists were cited as saying Wednesday." (St. Louis
Post-Dispatch)
"Testing
Corn Affects Cheetos Supply" - "DALLAS - Cheetos lovers,
prepare for a crunch. Supplies of the cheese-flavored snack are down by as
much as 10 percent as maker Frito-Lay Inc. attempts to keep genetically
engineered corn from the recipe." (AP)
"Tokyo
orders rooftop gardens on new buildings" - "Authorities
in Tokyo are ordering owners of new buildings to turn part of their rooftops
into gardens to combat rising temperatures in the city. The nationally
circulated Mainichi newspaper says the order, which will take effect next April,
requires that plants cover at least one fifth of all available rooftop space.
... Rising output of gases believed to be warming the Earth's atmosphere,
combined with a decrease in heat-absorbing greenery, have caused the annual
average temperature in Tokyo to rise 2.9C (5.2F) in the last century." (Ananova)
That rise isn't "global warming" though, it's
UHIE (Urban Heat Island Effect). Actually, New Scientist ran the
feature "Totally
Tropical Tokyo" discussing (albeit briefly) this a few months
ago.
Canada waking up to the cost of demagoguery? "Canada's
dirty new image" - "Country has gone from being a green leader
to having a reputation as an environmental bad boy" (says MARK MacKINNON) [Global
warming deal stalls] (GAM)
"BID
TO RESCUE GLOBAL WARMING TALKS FAILS, U.S. NEGOTIATOR SAYS"
(Chicago Tribune)
"Kyoto
can't be fixed" - "Failure to reach an agreement on
implementing the Kyoto protocol is no surprise, writes S. Fred Singer. Neither
science nor politics will support it" (National Post)
"What
Nature Creates, Humans Put Asunder" - "Last issue, we
speculated that the timing of two important articles in Nature
magazine was no accident. Appearing just before the big United Nations
confab at the Hague, that publication argued that so-called
"sequestration" of carbon dioxide by forestation might in fact make
global warming worse. Those articles were in direct contravention of a large
body of scientific research (see Cutting
Edge). In fact, researchers such as Song-Miao Fan at Princeton have
demonstrated that North American forests may in fact capture more carbon than
is emitted during the industrial activity of the United States and Canada
(Figure 1)." (GES)
"EU
urges Japan, U.S. to drop 'sink' proposal: officials" -
"NICE, France Dec. 9 - The European Union (EU) has urged Japan, the
United States and Canada to withdraw their joint proposal to cut levels of
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions through so-called carbon ''sinks,'' or the
natural absorption of the gas by trees and soil, to secure a deal to tackle
global warming, officials close to a talk held in Ottawa this week said
Friday." ( Kyodo)
"The
Curious Case of the Forest Sink"
- "The latest climate models cast a baleful future abetted by plants and
soil. In the models, future global warming upsets the ability of plants and
soil to hold carbon—so much so that they will add to the air’s carbon
dioxide beyond the direct emissions from human activities, thus worsening
global warming. How?" (GES)
"The Week That
Was December 9, 2000 brought to you by SEPP" - "NEW ON THE
SEPP WEB: In addition to providing a "scientific
cover" for Al Gore's campaign speech on global warming, the leaked
IPCC draft Summary was also supposed to boost the Hague climate negotiations.
But by now, most of the world had been immunized to scary weather stories and
climate disasters. The collapse of the Hague talks could have been predicted -
and was -- from the tone of the massive
ads that ran in major newspapers. Our article in the Financial Times
(Canada) provides an analysis of the US position that proved to be
unacceptable to Europeans." (SEPP)
"Green
credibility took a pasting" - "When you hear talk of saving
the planet from now on, count your spoons. Hardly anybody seriously uses a
phrase like "saving the planet" out loud - it sounds too grand and
silly. But some people write it on posters and protest placards and, lately,
in newspapers lamenting the collapse of climate change talks at The Hague. The
casualty of that collapse was not the planet so much as the credibility of
those who claim to be most concerned about it." (NZ Herald)
"Japan
should consider environment tax: panel" - "TOKYO Dec. 10 -
The Japanese government should consider introducing a tax on carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions and other economic measures in order to reduce waste and
tackle global warming, according to a draft proposal from the Central
Environment Council. The draft, obtained Saturday by Kyodo News, outlines a
comprehensive program with specific measures and numerical targets which the
council says is essential to tackle global warming and other environmental
problems in a strategic manner." ( Kyodo)
"Will
Global Warming Increase El Niños?"
- "During the height of El Niño mania in 1998, a few scientists, most
prominently Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research,
began pushing a theoretical El Niño–global warming linkage. Surely, people
reasoned, El Niños must get worse or become more common as carbon dioxide
levels increase. Mustn't they?" (GES)
December 8, 2000
"Get
the butterfly net for inattentive media" - "'Good news isn't
news' appears to be the media's attitude to- ward food biotechnology
controversies. Environmental Protection Agency science advisers just
determined that the biotech corn involved in the recent taco shell recall is
unlikely to cause any health problems." (Steve Milloy, Washington Times)
"Final
Countdown at EPA" - "Lame duck EPA administrator Carol
Browner just announced her plan to clean the Hudson River -- by polluting it.
New York residents are lucky that Browner’s plan won’t survive the
litigation that’s almost certain to follow. The rest of us are lucky that
this is one of the last acts of a demagogic bureaucrat who abused her office
and politicized the EPA like no prior administrator." (Steve Milloy at
FoxNews.com)
"Toxic
chemical treaty in sight despite EU-U.S. spat" - "Global
talks to ban or curb production of some of the world's most dangerous
chemicals resumed in South Africa today with delegates confident of a deal
despite a dispute between Europe and the United States. The talks, under the
auspices of the U.N. Environment Programme, are the fifth round of global
discussions on POPs and are expected to produce a treaty to be signed at a
diplomatic conference scheduled for Stockholm next May." (Reuters) [Third
report from the POPs convention (Roger Bate, FightingMalaria.org)]
"South
Africa Defends DDT Use to Fight Malaria" - "JOHANNESBURG -
South Africa said on Thursday it needed to keep using DDT to fight a growing
threat from the lethal, mosquito-borne disease malaria. South Africa is
hosting U.N.-sponsored talks aimed at curbing or eliminating 12 persistent
organic pollutants (POPs) including DDT, which has been used since World War
II to protect people from malaria." (Reuters)
"POPS TREATY NEEDS PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH" -
"JOHANNESBURG, South Africa, December 6, 2000 - Negotiators for the
United States say the U.S. supports taking a precautionary approach to
protecting human health and the environment - at least as far as the ongoing
negotiations to control persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are
concerned." (ENS)
"A
biting truth" - "... In this context, a brute application of
the precautionary principle would seem to suggest that, with the dangers of
malaria so obvious and with the virtues of prohibition so uncertain, no one
should demand that DDT be banned for malarial uses until something better -- a
vaccine, an equally effective and cheap pesticide -- is available. Anything
less isn't environmental precautionism; it is murder in the name of
environmental absolutism." (GAM)
"Greenpeace
raises dioxin concerns" - "The environmental group
Greenpeace says its discovery of what it has described as a mid-range amount
of dioxin in a sample of Australian butter sounds a warning on toxic
chemicals." (ABC News Online)
Well blimey! The `peas have found dioxin in
animal fat! Given that mammals dump ubiquitous dioxin in fat, without regard
for whether these compounds are the natural result of combustion of organic
material (at less than 2,500°C) or whether they bear tiny 'formed through
human action' labels, this should come as no surprise to anyone.
How important is it to people? Probably not very.
Studies conducted for more than 50 years are, at best, contradictory. For
example, among the commonly cited research are studies (of
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN - perhaps the most 'toxic' of the 200+
compounds known as dioxin) which suggest a possible slight increase in
cancer incidence among workers exposed to significant dioxin levels over
sustained periods - except that overall mortality rates are lower
than anticipated. This means that people exposed to significant levels of
dioxin over sustained periods may expect to live longer than the normally
expected lifespan for the region but, when they do eventually die, there is
a slightly enhanced risk that they will have cancer. Note, however, that
there are no known instances of people exposed only to dioxins and therefore
the increased incidence of cancers observed may be due to other compounds to
which they were simultaneously exposed.
How about teratogenic and/or carcinogenic potential
then? The following is extracted from "NATURE'S
CHEMICALS AND SYNTHETIC CHEMICALS: COMPARATIVE TOXICOLOGY" (Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Classification: Medical Sciences Contributed by Bruce
N. Ames)
If TCDD [2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin] is
compared with alcohol it seems of minor interest as a teratogen or
carcinogen. Alcoholic beverages are the most important known human
chemical teratogen (43). In contrast, there is no persuasive evidence that
TCDD is either carcinogenic or teratogenic in humans, although it is both
at near-toxic doses in rodents. If one compares the teratogenic potential
of TCDD to that of alcohol for causing birth defects (after adjusting for
their respective potency as determined in rodent tests), then a daily
consumption of the [US] EPA reference dose of TCDD (6 fg) would be
equivalent in teratogenic potential to a daily consumption of alcohol from
1/3,000,000 of a beer. That is equivalent to drinking a single beer (15 g
ethyl alcohol) over a period of 8,000 years.
Given that much of the industrialised world has
production and distribution industries for the express purpose of providing
consumers with ethyl alcohol, and that said alcohol is consumed in units
roughly 3,000,000 times the equivalent of the US EPA's reference dose for
dioxin, then we must assume that dioxins are quite irrelevant. With the
exception of chloracne, there is no known dioxin-causal association with
human ill-effect.
It is perfectly true that a few polychlorinated dioxins
and furans are highly toxic and extremely dangerous - it is not true that
the traces of dioxin the `peas found in butter is any more dangerous
than Ben &
Jerry's ice cream.
"US
Gulf War study cuts chemical release by half" - "WASHINGTON
- A plume of low-level nerve gas released shortly after the Gulf War ended and
investigated for possible links to mysterious symptoms affecting US troops,
contained about half the chemical agents than initially believed, the Pentagon
said on Tuesday." (Reuters)
"Supreme
Court to rule on lawn pesticide ban" - "OTTAWA -- Seven
Supreme Court of Canada judges will decide whether a Quebec bylaw banning
cosmetic pesticides oversteps municipal powers after two companies challenged
the bylaw Thursday. Environmentalists defended the bylaw in a case that could
affect lawns and gardens across Canada. The high court reserved judgment and
is not expected to rule for several months." (CP) [Reuters]
"The
Last Word On Organic Safety" - "National standards for
organic food will be released soon, and they will make clear that such
products aren't safer or more nutritious than conventional products,
Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman says. (Some people maintain that organic
foods are actually more dangerous. Glickman said the final regulations "will
be clear that these rules are not to disparage in any way any other kinds of
foods." (GuestChoice.com)
"Glickman:
Organic Standards Coming" - "WASHINGTON — National
standards for organic food will be released soon, and they will make clear
that such products aren't safer or more nutritious than conventional products,
Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman says." (AP)
"Fears grow
over CJD link to polluted water" - "FEARS of a CJD epidemic
grew yesterday following EU claims that mad cow disease and its human
variation may be passed on through polluted drinking water. A major alert was
sounded after the surprise EU disclosure that BSE (mad cow disease) could be
transmitted through water from the excrement of infected cattle." (Irish
Independent)
"Green
Fuels Threaten Britain's Bird Population" - "LONDON -
Chemicals used to make environmentally-friendly fuels could spell disaster for
many British birds, experts said on Thursday." (Reuters)
"Norwegian
drivers prove astonishingly sober" - "OSLO, Norway -- Norway
called out nearly its entire police force to test the country's drivers for
alcohol before a new law goes into effect imposing tougher limits on blood
alcohol content. The drivers overwhelmingly passed. The drunken driving test
had been announced in advance in a campaign to raise awareness of the new
alcohol limits that take effect Jan. 1. The law lowers the blood alcohol
threshold for drunken driving to 0.02 percent from the current 0.05 percent --
the equivalent of one beer." (AP)
"Games
strain on children" - "A doctor has warned about the danger
of computer games after treating a young boy for repetitive strain
injury." (BBC Online)
"‘Smart growth’
is hotly debated" - "ATLANTA, Dec. 7
— The country’s top proponents of
“smart growth” — dense development that combines homes within walking
distance of schools, stores and workplaces — met this week in
sprawl-impaired Atlanta, and the hot topic was one seen across the nation:
overcoming local opposition to change." (MSNBC)
Read: imposing your worldview on more rational people.
Today's moron feature: "ECOTERRORISTS
STRIKE LONG ISLAND CONSTRUCTION SITE" - "LONG ISLAND, New York,
December 7, 2000 (ENS) - Last Friday, members of the Earth Liberation Front
(ELF) attacked a development site in Middle Island, Long Island, leaving a
trail of property destruction in their wake. The ELF smashed more than 200
windows of houses already erected, pulled up survey stakes to delay clear
cutting, spraypainted structures with slogans denoucing urban sprawl, and
sabotaged 12 construction vehicles." (ENS)
"Fearing
Bush Will Win, Groups Plan Pollution Suits" - "WASHINGTON,
Dec. 6 — Saying it was increasingly likely that Gov. George W. Bush would be
the next president, a number of leading environmentalists have enlisted trial
lawyers in a strategy to circumvent what they predicted would be the
antienvironmental spirit of a new Bush administration. The strategy would rely
on the filing of huge lawsuits against polluters as an alternative to the
enforcement of federal regulations and would borrow heavily from the legal
tactics honed in the tobacco wars." (NY Times)
I take this to mean that misanthropists realise their
flake-in-chief will not be able to use executive orders to impose Earth
In the Balance as a universal policy manual and they will therefore
use endless litigation to destroy commerce and people's living standards.
Hopefully the judiciary will recognise the hazards posed by this development
and make this tactic short-lived and extremely expensive for the whacko
brigade.
"No
meeting of minds at telepathy trial" - "THE world's biggest
psychic experiment yesterday failed to come up with a shred of evidence
for telepathy. But then, the true psychics would have known that anyway. Over
the course of 10 experiments, several hundred people failed to project a set
of images to volunteers in a sealed room several hundred feet away. The
volunteers should have got between two and three images right just by random
chance. In fact they scored one out of 10." (Telegraph)
"Gene
technology regulation becomes law" - "Controversial laws
regulating gene technology in Australia have been passed by parliament after a
marathon debate in the Senate. The laws, governing the use of genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) such as crops and GM foods, are a first for
Australia, with GMOs currently overseen by a regulatory body. The minor
opposition parties tried but failed to pass a number of amendments to the
laws." (AAP) [MPs'
marathon gives gene law go-ahead (SMH)] [Deal
over GM law a 'disaster' (The Age)]
"GM
laws 'not tough enough'" - "AUSTRALIA'S organic farmers
today warned controversial new legislation on gene technology would not
protect farmers from the spread of genetic crops." (AAP)
"Starlink's
Risks Minuscule" - John R. Cady, president and CEO of the
National Food Processors Association, writes in this op-ed that the presence
of StarLink corn in human food products for which it currently is not licensed
is a regulatory violation that should never have happened. But, says Cady, the
overwhelming body of scientific evidence indicates that products containing
StarLink cornpose no health risk to consumers. This is why the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) should grant a temporary exemption to allow the
inadvertent presence of StarLink corn in food products. (USA Today)
"Texas
A&M Biologists Are Developing Genetically Modified Rice Resistant To
Insects And Microbes" - "Texas A&M University biologists
are developing genetically modified rice resistant to insects and microbes,
which could revolutionize the food and agriculture industries and help
alleviate hunger in developing countries. For many years, spraying
insecticides on rice crops has been the best way to protect rice crops from
insects. Scientists are now creating new strains of rice plants that would
contain insect-killing proteins, so no insecticide would be needed."
(Science Daily)
"Environmentalists
Target Eastern Europe Tastes" - "BRUSSELS -
Environmentalists who successfully steered public tastes in western Europe
away from genetically modified (GM) foods said on Thursday they would now
target the former communist countries of eastern Europe." (Reuters)
"Diabetes
gene therapy draws closer" - "Scientists have engineered
mice to make human insulin in the gut, in a move that could one day free
diabetics from regular insulin injections. The rodents manufactured the
hormone in intestinal cells when they were fed. Normally, only cells of the
pancreas can make insulin. Canadian researchers who carried out the
experiments propose that similar gene therapy techniques might eventually be
used to correct diabetes in people." (BBC Online)
"Developing
Edible Vaccines Against Hepatitis B Virus" - "The
hepatitis B virus has infected more than 2 billion people alive today and 350
million of these are chronically infected carriers of the virus and are at
increased risk of death from active hepatitis, cirrhosis and primary
hepatocellular cancer. Edible vaccines may play a big part in the future for
protection against Hepatitis B infection, scientists heard Wednesday when
Prof. Yasmin Thanavala from Roswell Park Cancer Institute in the US described
her research at the British Society for Immunology's Congress 2000 in
Harrogate, UK." (UniSci)
"Ground-breaking
solutions to global warming" -
"Could the solution to the problem of global warming lie in the soil? As
negotiators resumed their efforts this week to agree on a deal to combat
climate change, soil was the last thing on their minds. But it seems that
farming carbon rather than crops could be the agriculture of the future."
(Independent)
"Climate
change about to be Bushwhacked" - "... One of Mr. Bush's
Texas colleagues in the House of Representatives, Joe Barton, said the other
day that if Mr. Bush wins the presidency, he (Barton) would recommend the
United States abandon the Kyoto agreement to control greenhouse gas emissions.
He reached that conclusion after observing the scene at the recent climate
change negotiations in The Hague, just before they crashed. "What you are
seeing here is an exercise in futility in the worst case, or an exercise in
fantasy in the best case," he said, "and nothing I have seen this
week is going to be voted on in a positive way" by the U.S.
Congress." (Terence Corcoran, National Post)
"Climate
Change Officials Edge Closer to Agreement" - "OTTAWA,
Ontario, Canada, December 7, 2000 - Two days of informal climate talks have
narrowed the gap between the European Union and other industrialized nations
on precisely how to limit the emission of greenhouse gases linked to global
warming." (ENS)
"Effort
to rescue climate deal fails" - "Senior officials from the
United States, the European Union and other key countries have failed in their
attempt to salvage something from the abortive climate change summit in
November in The Hague." (BBC Online) [Reuters]
"Arctic
sea ice 'thins by almost half'" - "... Dr Wadhams told BBC
News Online: "Between summer 1976 and summer 1996 there was a 43%
thinning of sea ice over a large area of the Arctic Ocean between Fram Strait
and the North Pole. "This came out of measurements which I did (on both
occasions) from British submarines - Sovereign in 1976 and Trafalgar in
1996." (BBC Online)
Interesting dates. See the contiguous US
temperature chart for a clear view of the cooling that occurred
~1945-1975 (when there were cries of impending ice age and the global
cooling crisis) and subsequent recovery ~1976-current. Implied then is that
polar ice was thicker at the end of a cooling phase and thinner after a
quarter-century recovery. I'm wondering if that should be seen as terribly
surprising. Of course, ambient temperature is only one factor, and possibly
a minor factor given the importance of the warm current conveying tropical
Atlantic warmth to Europe and beyond, without which The Hague would host
polar bears instead of climate confabs. This could be a response to the NAO
(North Atlantic Oscillation) or to another phenomenon we know little about,
the AO (Arctic Oscillation). Then again, it might be none of the above -
we'll just have to wait a few decades and see what happens.
"MAJOR
ARCTIC OUTBREAK THREATENS WESTERN AND CENTRAL UNITED STATES" -
"December 7, 2000 — A severe Arctic cold outbreak is poised to sweep
through the western and central United States, endangering large portions of
the country, according to NOAA's National
Weather Service. "This cold air system is an example of the type of
weather the United States can expect as we return to a normal winter,"
said retired Air Force Brigadier General Jack Kelly, director of NOAA's
National Weather Service. "Because we are expecting variable and
sometimes severe weather conditions this year, it is particularly important
that people pay attention to weather forecasts and be prepared." (NOAA) [U.S.
Warns of 50% Rise in Heat Costs (NY Times)] [Cold
weather heats up worries about electricity (The Oregonian)]
"ANALYSIS
- Cleaner coal arrives, but will it become mainstream?" -
"NEW YORK - Environmentalists have long lobbied to dethrone coal as the
top power source in the US, but with soaring natural gas prices, and new
cleaner-burning technologies, coal's reign may extend well into the future,
industry experts said." [Soaring
natgas prices revive interest in coal] (Reuters)
"Carbon
dioxide's climate-warming link challenged" - "... Many
factors can warm the climate, and carbon dioxide is just one of them, says Dr.
Jan Veizer, a geologist who is the lead author of the controversial report.
And the gas, he says, does not appear to play a leading role in triggering
warming. "What we are showing is that in the past, in very big climate
changes, there is no correlation with CO2," he says. During an ice age
about 400 million years ago, the evidence indicates the level of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere was about 15 times current concentrations. "If
CO2 is a driver, how can you get an ice age when CO2 was 15 times higher than
they are today?" Dr. Veizer said in an interview." (National Post) [BBC
Online]
"CO2
and global climate: Is history bunk?" - "The consensus that
atmospheric carbon dioxide has been the driving force in global climate change
is brought into question by a new reconstruction of tropical sea surface
temperatures throughout the past 540 million years. Is it that currently
accepted historic reconstructions of past carbon dioxide concentrations are
unreliable, or are current climate simulations calibrated such that they give
unreliable 'predictions' for what happened to past climate? The new results
come from a database of oxygen isotope concentrations in calcite and aragonite
shells which indicate that large oscillations in tropical sea surface
temperature were in phase with the coming and going of ice ages, but at odds
with predictions based on carbon dioxide as the cause." (Nature)
Wishful thinking of
the day: "Smokestack
Lightning" - "... Corporations have another
motivation for taking the initiative: buy low, pollute high. Right now,
companies can buy the credit to emit carbon dioxide for anywhere between $1
and $4 a ton. Natsource, a broker in carbon dioxide and other emissions,
estimates that reductions now worth $600,000 could reach prices as high as $12
million in an official market." (Village Voice)
There are a few little problems with this - zealots
have amply demonstrated that they are not the least interested in limiting
carbon emissions (and nor should anyone else be for CO2 is not
a 'pollutant' but a trace gas essential to life on Earth). Enviro-flakes and
the EU block they control literally sank carbon sinks (which could work if
there were a need for them) for the simple reason that they want energy use
and human endeavour limited - the enhanced greenhouse nonsense is merely a
convenient tool for the purpose. It is irrelevant to them (and the planet)
exactly who does what with carbon as long as people don't prosper (that's
bad for Gaia, or something like that). You think you're going to make big
bucks out of hot air guys? Here's some really sad news for you. Even under
the nightmare scenario that Kyoto should ever be ratified and brought
into force, 'carbon credits' won't make it because the zealots driving the
entire farce are dead set against them. Your hot air credit is now, and will
always be, worth squat.
"EPA
to crack down on recreational vehicle emissions" - "The list
of air-pollution sources cleaned up by the Clinton administration reads like a
child's book of things that go: cars and pickups, locomotives and tugboats,
big rigs, tractors, even riding lawnmowers. Now the Environmental
Protection Agency is getting ready to restrict air pollution from just about
everything else that moves and has an engine, including recreational vehicles
that are the favorite playthings for millions of Americans." (USA Today)
"The
Ozone Layer" - "It is good news indeed to hear that the
holes in the earth's ozone layer, which opened up over polar regions between
the 1950s and the 1980s, will soon begin to shrink. Indeed they could close up
completely over the next 50 years, if progress continues in tackling the
problem. This demonstrates that preventative action taken by governments,
based on scientific research and advice, can make a crucial difference in
protecting the earth's environment. It should give heart to those who have
lamented the failure to agree on the separate problem of global warming at the
United Nations climate change conference in The Hague last month." (Irish
Times)
Healed? It is far from certain that the conceptual
'ozone layer' is even injured.
December 7, 2000
"Second
report from the POPs convention" - "India and Tanzania
requested exemptions for DDT use (India for production and use; Tanzania for
use) under the treaty, which brings the number of countries who have asked to
use DDT for malaria control to 11. At least 10 countries without stockpiles of
DDT have not asked for exemptions, but they hopefully will do so over the next
few days. Some are still concerned about pressure from donors." (Roger
Bate, FightingMalaria.org)
Oh, here's a gem: "Talc,
Wood Dust Eyed as Carcinogens" -
"WEDNESDAY, Dec. 6 -- It's an end-of-the-year list no substance -- or its
maker -- wants to make." (HealthScout)
Check out this item from the list: "Ultraviolet
Radiation: The government says ultraviolet light in general is
known to cause skin cancer, so it merits inclusion in the list of known
carcinogen. However, NIEHS says it's not clear whether one form of UV rays --
UVA or UVB-is more dangerous than the other, so each should be considered
likely carcinogens."
Ooh... this is a good one. For how many years have people
been indoctrinated about the dangers of UVB, supposedly so much more prolific
at Earth's surface due to purported depletion of the ozone layer? Ozone
hysterics have always blithely ignored changes in fashion and lifestyle - in
the period in which skin damage from ultraviolet now manifesting itself in
rising skin cancer incidence was done, people went from neck-to-knee swimsuits
to bikinis, from negligible outdoor leisure time to significant - but no, it's
depletion of the ozone layer that is to blame. (Ozone has the
formula O3; it is always present in trace quantities in the Earth's
atmosphere, but its largest concentrations are in the ozonosphere. There it is
formed primarily as a result of shortwave solar ultraviolet radiation
(wavelengths shorter than 242 nanometres), which dissociates normal molecular
oxygen (O2) into two oxygen atoms. These oxygen atoms then combine
with nondissociated molecular oxygen to yield ozone. Ozone, once it has been
formed, can also be easily destroyed by solar ultraviolet radiation of
wavelengths less than 300 nanometres. Because of the strong absorption of
solar ultraviolet radiation by molecular oxygen and ozone, solar radiation
capable of producing ozone cannot reach the lower levels of the atmosphere,
and the photochemical production of ozone is not significant below about 20 km
(12 miles). Even though the ozone layer is about 40 km (25 miles) thick, the
total amount of ozone, compared with more abundant atmospheric gases, is quite
small. If all of the ozone in a vertical column reaching up through the
atmosphere were compressed to sea-level pressure, it would form a layer only a
few millimetres (one-eighth of one inch) thick. Molecular oxygen (O2),
some 20.9% of the free atmosphere, blocks the vast majority of solar UV
radiation.) The finger of blame had to be pointed at UVB or the ozone scare
would not work because prolific O2, one-fifth of the atmosphere,
effectively blocks UVA. And here's NIEHS happily admitting that we don't know
which is particularly dangerous (if any), so we'll declare both likely
carcinogens. Of course, Warnings
on sun cancer [are] `one-sided' by some reckonings and people are blocking
too much essential UVB exposure to synthesise sufficient vitamin D to reduce
the risk of fractures, colon cancer and other diseases.
So, we have already terrorised some people into poor
health with an ill-founded scare campaign, knowing that clothing fashion and
lifestyle have been the significant determinant in skin cancer risk, all the
while blaming 'depletion' of the ozone layer - which may or may not be true
but only occurs in localised regions at freezing temperatures (obviously a lot
a people likely to be sunbathing then) and now, NIEHS are out to formalise the
hysteria by declaring essential sunlight as 'a likely carcinogen.'
Bloody marvellous!
"Scientists
look to smoking genes link" - "Scientists are trying to
identify specific genes associated with increased difficulty in quitting
smoking. The team, headed by geneticist Professor Nick Martin of the
Queensland Institute of Research, has attracted an $8 million grant from the
US National Institute of Health." (ABC News Online)
"Working
environment greater cause of absenteeism than lifestyle" -
"Monotonous work, outdated management practices, the lack of
possibilities to influence decision making, and a poor atmosphere at work are
a greater cause of absenteeism from work than obesity, the lack of exercise,
heavy smoking, or excessive consumption of alcohol. These findings are among
the results of the Kunta8 study, involving eight cities and towns of
different sizes. One part of the study focuses on the impact of problems
involving an employee’s lifestyle and those of the working environment on
absenteeism from work. The survey involved about 6,500 municipal
employees." (Helsingen Sanomat)
"EPA's
Absurd Dredging Proposal Sets Course For Environmental Devastation of Hudson
River"
"EPA's proposal today charts a course of environmental devastation for
the Upper Hudson River for a generation or more. The proposal is absurd. EPA has
willfully ignored its own finding in 1984 that a massive dredging program like
the one proposed today would be ``devastating to the river ecosystem.'' This
proposal makes no sense because, as people who live near the river know, the
Hudson is dramatically cleaner today than it was when EPA rejected dredging
sixteen years ago." (GE) [EPA
set to unveil huge New York river dredging project; EPA
vows to clean Hudson River; GE opposes plan (CNN)] [Hudson
neighbors split over dredging (MSNBC)] [U.S.
to Order $490 Million River Cleanup by G.E. (NY Times)]
Any colour you like, as long
as it's green? "Ford
Chairman Trades on Green Credentials" - "... Along with
martial arts, he embraces acupuncture and homeopathy and has studied yoga, as
well as Zen and Tibetan and Vipassana Buddhism. He has been a vegetarian for 10
years. But Mr. Ford says his real passion is the environment." (Herald
Tribune)
?!! "Avoiding
Pesticides: Simple Steps Can Make a Big Difference" - "You can
protect your health and the health of the environment by avoiding
pesticides" (iVillage)
Really? According to Bruce Ames, 99.9% of pesticides in
the human diet are all-singing, all-dancing, all-natural. Every plant not
long-since consumed out of existence employs one or both of two strategies to
minimise predation by consumers. Either they produce toxins and/or irritants -
pesticides - or they produce sticky sap to clog the mandibles of consumers, or
both. As consumers, we have evolved strategies to deal with this. Either we
metabolise the toxins to some benign form or we lose our appetite for the item
prior to consuming a lethal dose. In any case we handle an extraordinary array
of toxins on a daily basis with minimal ill-effect. Even the negligible
portion of synthesised compounds we consume are within our hereditary
experience and ability to handle because the vast majority of synthesised
compounds are mimics of that which we have found in nature (we're not really
that inventive but are getting better at copying that which other 'critters'
have developed by trial and error over millennia).
Avoid pesticides? Absolute twaddle!</p>
"How
do you want it grilled? Well-flipped, easy on the amines" -
"The safest hamburger may be a well-flipped hamburger, a new study from the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California suggests." (NY Times)
See Hamburger
Report Not Well Done
"Acne
drug will come with warning" - "WASHINGTON -- Patients who
take the powerful acne drug Accutane will soon get special warning brochures
outlining side effects -- including a possible, but not proven, link to
suicide." (The Oregonian)
The end for organic produce? "Food
claims 'must be honest'" - "A code of practice to ensure that
health claims on food are truthful and helpful to shoppers is being launched on
Thursday. The code has been backed by consumer groups, the food industry and
regulators, including Sir John Krebs, chairman of the Food Standards Agency. It
is designed to stop manufactures making health claims that they cannot
substantiate." (BBC Online)
"EU
admits BSE test is to increase confidence, not safety" -
"The European Commission has admitted that the BSE
test it hopes to introduce throughout Europe cannot be used to reassure the
public over the safety of continental beef. The admission follows yesterday's
report in The Independent that the test for "mad cow" disease
has never been properly validated." (Independent)
"Hey
parents - Skip the soda, go for the milk" - "The next time
your child's thirsty, skip the soda pop and give him or her milk ... or juice.
It's a good habit to get into, according to a study published in the Archives of
Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, which noted nutrient deficiencies in children
who regularly chose carbonated soda over milk or juice. Milk and fruit juice are
among the top sources of vitamin A, vitamin C, B vitamins, vitamin D, calcium,
magnesium and phosphorus for children in the United States. According to the
study, children who consumed soda regularly weren't likely to meet the daily
recommendations for these vitamins and minerals, all of which are necessary for
a child's growth and development." (Mayo Clinic)
Uh-oh! PETA won't like this - don't you know they
disapprove of milk products and sound human nutrition? See also: PETA's
zeal pushes the envelope too far for some
"Drink
to think" - "TOO much alcohol dulls your senses, but a study
in Japan shows that moderate drinkers have a higher IQ than
teetotallers." (New Scientist)
"USDA
to Report on Health Effects of Popular Diets" - "WASHINGTON
- Diet doctors beware: the Agriculture Department will release a report next
month summarizing the latest research on the health and nutrition effects of
popular diets, Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman said on Wednesday."
(Reuters)
"Food
body leads push to zap herbs, spices" - "All imported
herbs and spices sold in New Zealand could soon be dosed with radiation
following moves to outlaw the alternative method of decontamination. The push by
Australian-based regulators who set food standards on both sides of the Tasman
would mean consume