December 24, 2008
New
York's Soda Tax Scam - New York Governor David Paterson has
proposed to levy an 18 percent tax on non-diet soft drinks under the guise
of combating obesity. Government doesn't get much more cynical than this.
(Steve Milloy, FoxNews.com)
sp!ked reviews 2008:
2008:
the year of living dangerously? - Let's put into perspective the mad,
green-tinged panics - from melting ice to Olympian smog - that made the
news in 2008.
The
year that humanity became the baddie - In 2008, movie misanthropy went
mainstream, but we had uplifting films about Russian scum and tightrope
walkers.
A
year of myths about smoking and obesity - At the fag end of 2008, two
experts look back at puffed-up claims about smoking bans and the 'obesity
epidemic'.
How
to have a merry and moral Christmas - Forget 'going ethical' by buying
overexpensive organic gifts you can't afford. Be moral this year instead.
(sp!ked)
Environmental
Restrictionists Could Use Polar Bears To Get In The Way Of Infrastructure
Projects - In his townhall.com column, Hugh Hewitt cites my recent
blogpost on Interior Secretary-designate Ken Salazar and raises the
question of how Salazar will deal with polar bears. Yes, polar bears. As
Hewitt points out in this column and as he has written on his blog at
hughhewitt.com, environmental restrictionists want to use the threat that
supposed global warming poses to polar bears as the basis of legal suits
to stop economic development not just in Alaska but throughout the United
States. This sounds outlandish, but it's true. No economic growth because
it might raise temperatures in the Arctic, which might in turn reduce the
number of ice floes that these attractive carnivores jump on. (Michael
Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog)
95,000
Excess U.S. Deaths during the Cold Months Each Year - Guest post by
Indur Goklany
Now that the cold weather is here, we should remember that more Americans
die during the cold months than at any other time of year, notwithstanding
any global warming.
The figure below, which is based on data from the US National Center for
Health Statistics for 2001-2007, shows that on average 7,200 Americans die
each day during the months of December, January, February and March,
compared to the average 6,400 who die daily during the rest of the year.
On this basis, there were 95,000 “excess” deaths during the 121 days
in the cold months (December to March, assuming a non-leap year).
So bundle up if you go outside, and keep warm indoors as well. (Watts Up
With That?)
It's Cold
Outside, But Global Warming Industry Still Hard At Work - The most
expensive secret you’re not supposed to know is that George W. Bush
leaves office with the planet cooler than when he entered. This dangerous
trend threatens the multi-billion dollar “global warming” industry,
adding new urgency to the ritual shriek of “we must act now!” in the
scramble to impose a costly regime of mandates and energy taxes.
The global warming industry’s tactics already range from comical to
reprehensible. As a result of a cooling atmosphere -- which thanks to the
“global cooling” panic we began measuring in 1979 -- you are
distracted with irrelevant surface temperatures. This is possibly because
more than 90% of our surface thermometer network is in violation of rules
for locating the instruments. For example, why are so many now on asphalt
parking lots, black tar roofs, airport tarmacs, and even hanging directly
above barbeque grills?
Such childishness is only the tip of the iceberg of outrages employed to
advance an ideological agenda. Our schools torment those whom they are
charged with protecting from abuse, with night terrors among the less
egregious outcomes. Their brainwashing includes hate mail campaigns to
skeptics, reporting on their parents’ willingness to adopt an agenda,
and even emotional breakdown requiring institutionalization. (Christopher
C. Horner, Human Events)
Christmas
Snow Job - It’s the most wonderful time of the year… well, it’s
Christmas and all those wonderful holiday-season movies are back on the
airwaves. One common feature is snow—we get the impression that every
American lives in a place that guarantees a white Christmas. Truth be
known, Americans experiencing a white Christmas are on a decline due
entirely to migration patterns to the Sun Belt, not global warming.
However, if you conduct a web search for “global warming and snow,” an
incredible 4.8 million sites are found. You will find everything from
global warming causes more snow to global warming causes less snow to
global warming is a snow job! Who can ever forget the January 22, 1996
Newsweek cover (below) screaming that blizzards should be blamed on global
warming? Get granddad and grandmom reminiscing about Christmas days in the
past and you might get the impression something has happened to the
climate system. (WCR)
Should tell you all you need to know... Lunacy
clouds climate change policy - British politicians have failed to heed
expert advice on greenhouse gases, but maybe Barack Obama will be
different
At long last, it seems as if a US president will be getting honest
scientific advice about climate change, with Barack Obama's appointment of
John Holdren as the director of the White House office of science and
technology policy.
In the UK, as long ago as the late 1980s, we were lucky enough to have Sir
John Houghton at the Met office and Sir Crispin Tickell, then the UK's
ambassador to the UN, to convince Margaret Thatcher that climate change
was a reality. So British politicians have had almost 20 years to plan the
changes we will need to make as we remove carbon from our economy. All the
more inexcusable then that many UK politicians, including Gordon Brown,
are still running the country as if climate change did not exist. (Peter
Melchett, The Guardian)
... with Melchett cheering misanthropic BS is guaranteed.
Update
By Mark Serreze On Current Sea Ice Coverage - There has been quite a
bit of commentary on the web with respect to the current absence of
continued freeze up of Arctic Sea ice as monitored by the National Snow
and Ice Data Center. Mark Serreze has graciously permitted Climate Science
to post the explanation for this lack of increase. His comment follows:
“We’ve been getting a lot of questions about this. We are quite
certain that the almost complete lack of increase in ice extent since
about December 10 is real. Satellite-derived ice extent from the SSM/I
(Special Sensor Microwaver/Imager) used to create the time series on our
website was checked against extent based on the AMSR (Advanced Microwave
Sounding Radiometer) instrument. AMSR shows the same pattern. This gives
us independent confirmation. The past 10 days has seen a very unusual
atmospheric pattern. It has been very warm over the Arctic Ocean, and wind
patterns have favored a compact ice cover. While the lack of increase in
ice extent is certainly quite unusual as well as interesting, we would not
read too much into it right now, at it is just weather. It will be
interesting to see what happens over the next week. [The] issue with
Chapman’s site, apparently, is that they are looking at area
(concentration weighted) versus extent (part of ocean covered with ice
with at least 15% concentration) The compaction that seems to be going on
could give a flat line in extent but still a rise in area. In other words,
the issue may be that we are looking at two different measures of ice
conditions. Also, it’s not clear (I’ll have to check) how current
Chapman’s data are. We had a delay in posting for awhile because of some
data dropouts. “ ( Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
Solar Activity
and Tropical Cyclones: Are the two related?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 649
individual scientists from 380
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from Canada's
Columbia Icefield, Canadian Rockies, Canada. To access the entire
Medieval Warm Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Tropical
Cyclones (Atlantic Ocean - Global Warming Effects: Frequency, The Past Few
Millennia): What do millennial reconstructions of intense Atlantic
hurricane activity reveal about the likelihood of global warming
increasing the yearly number of Atlantic hurricanes?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Garden
Bean, Marine
Diatom, Sundial
Lupine, and Sweet
Orange Tree.
Journal Reviews:
"Rocky
Mountain High": Does the song reflect the character of the
region's late 20th-century temperatures?
Solar Forcing
of Droughts in East-Central North America: What is the evidence for
the linkage? ... and how strong is it?
Pollen and
Allergies in Switzerland: How have they varied over the past few
decades?
Opiate
Production by Poppies: How is it affected by elevated atmospheric CO2
concentrations?
Root
Respiration and Global Warming: Does the former rise exponentially in
response to the latter, as so many modeling studies suggest?
(co2science.org)
Spreading contagion: California
will see clout increase at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue -
WASHINGTON — California will regain some of its political mojo next
year, on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
On Capitol Hill, California lawmakers will chair the committees that
manage health, education, energy and more. One California senator will
oversee the nation's spies. The other will write global warming
legislation. A willful San Franciscan will run the House of
Representatives.
Sixteen blocks away, the White House and its executive branch environs
will be equally well-populated by Californians. Two cabinet secretaries
and multiple key economic, environmental and legislative advisers bring
years of California experience.
Simply by the numbers, California's renewed stature seems undeniable. The
numbers and titles, though, don't tell the whole story. Clout, it turns
out, is complicated. (McClatchy Newspapers)
Major
FDA consumer alert on diet pills - The FDA just issued one of the
largest and most serious consumer alerts about over-the-counter
supplements being sold for weight loss. Twenty five products were found to
be tainted with active pharmaceutical ingredients that may put people’s
health at significant risk. (Junkfood Science)
The
hospital was unaware any medical records had been stolen… -
The steady reports of security breaches of electronic medical records are
too numerous to report. The latest one at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in
Los Angeles deserves a special note, though, because the hospital has had
a history of problems with breaches of patients’ private medical
information and yet, in this latest identity theft, hospital officials
were oblivious that the records had even been stolen and were being used
for illegal activity until alerted by prosecutors.
It shows, once again, as security experts know, that no electronic system
is invulnerable. (Junkfood Science)
A
special thanks - Thank you so much, Dr. John Brignell, Ph.D., for your
incredibly kind acknowledgment and encouragement. I hope all of the
science-minded readers at Number Watch whom you’ve generously tutored
and mentored over the years are pushing your PayPal button, too! (Junkfood
Science)
Do
fish fly? - Jeremy Piven abruptly quit his $15,000 a week gig in the
Broadway revival of David Mamet’s Speed-the-Plow last week, when his
doctor claimed he had mercury poisoning from all of the sushi he’d been
eating.
For this story to be true, he would be the first human in recorded
history* to get mercury poisoning from eating sushi in this country.
Is it time to contact the Guiness Book of World Records or is this story a
little fishy?
While none of us knows Mr. Piven’s actual medical condition and can only
go by what has been reported in the news, this theatrical story is fueling
a lot of fears that sushi can cause mercury toxicity. That makes it
worthwhile to bring some science to the sensation. (Junkfood Science)
So
Is Fish Safe to Eat or Not? - The federal government has been trying
to persuade pregnant and breast-feeding women to limit their intake of
fish because of mercury contamination. Now some federal scientists are
arguing that these women should actually increase their fish consumption.
The behind-the-scenes disagreement is fierce and raises serious questions
for consumers. (New York Times)
Short answer? Fish is very good food and "advisories" are
triggered by truly enormous safety margins. Your baby is probably at
greater risk of malnutrition than from the mercury content of any
commercially available fish even if you ate nothing else (not advised,
you should eat a balanced diet). This terror campaign over fish and
health does far more harm than good.
The assault on useful compounds is relentless: Phthalates
and Cumulative Risk Assessment The Task Ahead - People are exposed to
a variety of chemicals throughout their daily lives. To protect public
health, regulators use risk assessments to examine the effects of chemical
exposures. This book provides guidance for assessing the risk of
phthalates, chemicals found in many consumer products that have been shown
to affect the development of the male reproductive system of laboratory
animals.
Because people are exposed to multiple phthalates and other chemicals that
affect male reproductive development, a cumulative risk assessment should
be conducted that evaluates the combined effects of exposure to all these
chemicals. The book suggests an approach for cumulative risk assessment
that can serve as a model for evaluating the health risks of other types
of chemicals. (NAP)
NOAA
Determines Ribbon Seals Should Not be Listed as Endangered - From a
NOAA press release:
NOAA today announced that ribbon seals are not in current danger of
extinction or likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future, and
should not be listed under the Endangered Species Act. (Alaska Report)
December 23, 2008
Economic
bloodletting - Doctors once prescribed bloodletting to eliminate
impurities that they believed caused disease. When George Washington was
stricken with malaria and a throat infection in December 1799, his
physicians bled a quart of blood from his weakened body, and followed that
with laxatives and emetics.
A few hours later, Washington died – from a cure far worse than the
disease.
Today, our nation is in a recession. Millions are unemployed. The
financial services, housing and stock market meltdown has hammered
incomes, consumer spending, savings, profits, tax revenues, charity,
remittances and foreign aid in America and across the globe.
Congress and the White House have responded with promises to spend $1
trillion or more, to bail out banks, homeowners, taxpayers, auto makers
and other beleaguered groups; fix roads and bridges; and weatherize
buildings, develop renewable energy and create "green jobs."
The economic situation is so dire, says President-Elect Obama, that we
can't worry about deficits. The "patient" needs a large
"blood infusion" stimulus to "get the economy moving."
But the proposed infusion is artificial blood: government loans, grants,
mandates and massive debts for our children – experimental treatments
that haven't worked in the past, and are unlikely to work now. Reduced
taxes and regulations would stimulate many more private sector initiatives
and jobs, argue many economists; but those curatives enjoy little support
among current political leaders.
Worse, there is a real danger that the stimulus actions will be followed
by the economic equivalent of medical practices that killed our first
president.
Precluding access to oil, gas, coal and uranium would deprive America of
fuels that produce 93% of the energy that makes jobs, living standards,
food, health and transportation possible. It would force us to continue
spending our children's inheritance on imported energy – and forego
trillions of dollars in leasing, royalty and tax revenues that could help
pay for stimulus, defense, renewable energy, low-income energy assistance
and other programs.
Some want even more extreme bloodletting administered in the name of
global warming. Mr. Obama wants a stringent cap-and-trade program, to
slash carbon dioxide "impurities" by 80% by 2050. He says any
company trying to build a coal-fired generating plant will be
"bankrupted" by greenhouse gas fees. (Paul Driessen, Enter Stage
Right)
NOAA's
Ark - President-elect Obama chooses as his science adviser and head of
our weather research agency two global warming activists who believe your
SUV is driving us over a climate cliff.
Personnel is policy, the political cliche goes, and on Saturday the Obama
administration's policy on global warming became clear. (IBD)
Major problem... Obama
team primed to push climate change agenda - WASHINGTON, Dec 22 -
President-elect Barack Obama's new "green dream team" is
committed to battling climate change and ready to push for big policy
reforms, in stark contrast with the Bush administration, environmental
advocates said on Monday.
"If this team can't advance strong national policy on global warming,
then no one can," said Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of
Concerned Scientists, referring to Obama's picks for the top energy and
environment jobs in his administration, which takes office on Jan. 20.
(Reuters)
... something which should be obvious to all just by noting who is
excited by the selection of this set of misanthropic dipsticks.
Fewer
Americans Worried About Climate Change - While still high, the
proportion of people in the United States who are concerned about climate
change has dropped this year, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 65
per cent of respondents believe global warming is a very or somewhat
serious problem, down eight points since April. (Angus Reid Global
Monitor)
Oh... Climate
change could one day doom "white Christmas" - BERLIN - The
odds of a "white Christmas" in temperate parts of the northern
hemisphere have diminished in the last century due to climate change and
will likely decline further by 2100, climate and meteorology experts said.
Even though heavy snow this year will guarantee a white Christmas in many
parts of Asia, Europe and North America, a 0.7-degree Celsius rise in
world temperatures since 1900 and projected bigger rises by 2100 suggest
an inexorable trend.
"The probability of snow on the ground at Christmas is already lower
than it was even 50 years ago but it will become an even greater rarity
many places by the latter half of the century," said
Friedrich-Wilhelm Gerstengarber, climate researcher at the Potsdam
Institute for Climate Impact Research. (Reuters)
Prominent
Scientist Fired By Gore Says Warming Alarm ‘Mistaken’, Joins Senate
Report of More Than 650 Dissenting Scientists - WASHINGTON, DC –
Award winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Will Happer, who was
reportedly fired by former Vice President Al Gore in 1993 for failing to
adhere to Gore’s scientific views, has now declared man-made global
warming fears “mistaken.”
“I am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is
mistaken,” Happer, who has published over 200 scientific papers, told
EPW on December 22, 2008. Happer made his remarks while requesting to join
the 2008 U.S. Senate Minority Report from Environment and Public Works
Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-OK) of over 650 (and growing) dissenting
international scientists disputing anthropogenic climate fears. (EPW Press
Blog)
Oh dear... Tough
climate goals may be easier than feared - OSLO - Tough targets for
avoiding dangerous global warming may be easier to achieve than widely
believed, according to a study that could ease fears of a prohibitive
long-term surge in costs.
The report, by scientists in the Netherlands and Germany, indicated that
initial investments needed to be high to have any impact in slowing
temperature rises. Beyond a certain threshold, however, extra spending
would have clear returns on warming.
Until now, most governments have worried that costs may start low and then
soar -- suggesting that ambitious targets will become too expensive for
tackling threats such as extinctions, droughts, floods and rising seas.
(Reuters)
... how can throwing money at a non-problem to tinker with irrelevant
peripheral parameters ever be anything but an expensive failure? How can
wasting monies that could be used to address real problems ever be
anything but an unmitigated disaster? Goals are fine but attempting to
implement this particular set represents monumental stupidity.
Polish
Sausage: The E.U. Fails On New Kyoto Effort - Europe was supposed to
be the Great White Hope for the environmental alarmists, the only credible
balancing force against the irresponsible and crass capitalism of the U.S.
which refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on carbon emissions. But the
results of the recent E.U. Climate Summit in Poznan, Poland showed that
hope to be misplaced.
In July the U.N.'s IPCC chair, Rajendra Pachauri, called on the E.U. to
"show the way" to the rest of the world. If the E.U. did not do
so, Pachauri said, "all attempts to manage the problem of climate
change will collapse." The meeting in Poland was supposed to
translate the E.U.’s ambitious target of 20 percent cuts in carbon
emissions by 2020 (compared with 1990 levels) into hard-nosed legally
binding agreements. In the end, the E.U. leadership approved a document
full of escape clauses.
While E.U. leaders said the deal was “an example for the world”,
environmental groups deemed it a betrayal of the E.U.’s efforts to fight
climate change. The World Wildlife Fund, among others, called upon the E.U.
Parliament to refuse major parts of the deal. They especially demanded the
rejection of the raft of exemptions from the cap-and-trade scheme. The E.U.
Parliament wasn’t listening. It duly ratified the deal.
Denying that the deal significantly watered down pre-conference goals, E.U.
leaders now hope they have done enough to convince the U.S., India, China,
and others to follow suit. But even a cursory review reveals the claims
don't stack up. (Peter C. Glover and Michael J. Economides, Energy
Tribune)
Deroy
Murdock: Global cooling? - Winter officially arrives today with the
solstice. But for many Americans, autumn 2008's final days already felt
like deepest, coldest January.
Some New Englanders still lack electricity after a Dec. 11 ice storm
snapped power lines. Up to eight inches of snow struck New Orleans and
southern Louisiana that day and didn't melt for 48 hours in some
neighborhoods.
In southern California Dec. 17, a half-inch of snow brightened Malibu's
hills while a half-foot barricaded highways and marooned commuters in
desert towns east of Los Angeles. Three inches of the white stuff
shuttered Las Vegas' McCarren Airport that day and dusted the Strip's
hotels and casinos.
What are the odds of that?
Actually, the odds are rising that snow, ice and cold will grow
increasingly common. As serious scientists repeatedly explain, global
cooling is here. It is chilling temperatures and so-called
"global-warming."
According to the National Climatic Data Center, 2008 will be America's
coldest year since 1997, thanks to La Nina and precipitation in the
central and eastern states. Solar quietude also may underlie global
cooling. This year's sunspots and solar radiation approach the minimum in
the sun's cycle, corresponding with lower Earth temperatures. This echoes
Harvard-Smithsonian astrophysicist Dr. Sallie Baliunas' belief that solar
variability, much more than CO2, sways global temperatures. (Washington
Times)
Global
cooling (Andrew Bolt Blog)
VIN SUPRYNOWICZ:
Cooling is 'not evidence that global warming is slowing' - My
relatives in New England are fighting their way out from under a giant ice
storm. Here in Las Vegas it's been snowing all week, several weeks earlier
than our usual one-day-a-year photo op of snow and icicles sparkling one
of our palm-bedecked golf courses before melting away by afternoon. The
National Weather Service calls it "a rare snow event."
Why? It's getting colder. 2008 was the coolest year in a decade.
The American mainstream press seem to know "team players" don't
mention such inconvenient developments, but in the U.K., the esteemed
Guardian reports, "This year is set to be the coolest since 2000,
according to a preliminary estimate of global average temperature that is
due to be released next week by the Met Office. The global average for
2008 should come in close to 14.3C, which is 0.14C below the average
temperature for 2001-07."
How stupid does this make politicians such as Barack Obama and the other
suckers who have fallen for the "global warming" hoax as they
race to say, "Never mind"?
Actually, they haven't missed a beat. These guys are so
"scientific" that the evidence of their own eyes and overcoats
has become irrelevant. They now contend global cooling is just further
proof of global warming. Honest.
So-called "climate scientists" insist "The relatively
chilly temperatures compared with recent years are not evidence that
global warming is slowing," The Guardian reports.
Um ... Earth's cooling doesn't mean the Earth is cooling? (Las Vegas
Review-Journal)
Completely
inadequate IPCC models produce the ultimate deception about man made
global warming - E. R. Beadle said, “Half the work done in the world
is to make things appear what they are not.” The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) does this with purpose and great effect. They
built the difference between appearance and reality into their process.
Unlike procedure used elsewhere, they produce and release a summary report
independently and before the actual technical report is completed. This
way the summary gets maximum media attention and becomes the public
understanding of what the scientists said. Climate science is made to
appear what it is not. Indeed, it is not even what is in their Scientific
Report. (Tim Ball, CFP)
Political
sunshine for Labor's climate change plan - After an entire week of
criticism, and after even their own analyst, Professor Garnaut, has
condemned it, the Rudd Government still stands by its climate plan.
Why? Because it is one of the best political moves they have ever made.
The Opposition is in an incredibly narrow corner, and Labor has
demonstrated that the wedge isn't just a Liberal tactic.
The Liberal Party is bemoaning the fact that the next fairly even
percentage level down from 5 per cent is 0, and realising that they really
have nowhere to go. Meanwhile, Labor strategists congratulate themselves
that the only party that protest votes could flow to, the Greens, will
inevitably deliver them the lost votes through preferences.
With the Green's protests having been relatively small and nobody
realising that the Government is simultaneously blaming population growth
for the difficulty in reducing emissions and trying to stimulate this same
growth with the baby bonus, the Government must be ecstatic. (Canberra
Times)
Why the opposition (such as it is) does not go for reality rather
than this gorebull warming nonsense remains a mystery -- it's not as if
they have anything to lose and they could ride to the rescue of the
populace (and into government) by blocking Left-imposed self-harm in the
name of fighting the phantom menace.
Hmm... Tropics
cooled by eruptions - A study released on Sunday revealed volcanic
eruptions have periodically cooled the tropics over at least the last 450
years.
PARIS - VOLCANIC eruptions have periodically cooled the tropics over at
least the last 450 years by spewing out particles that girdle the world at
high altitude and reflect sunlight, according to a study released on
Sunday.
The research adds a chunk of regional evidence to earlier work that found
major eruptions - such as Krakatoa, Indonesia in 1883 and Huaynaputina,
Peru in 1600 - contribute to cooling on a worldwide scale.
A trio of scientists led by Dr Rosanne D'Arrigo of the Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, looked at ocean temperatures in
a belt extending from 30 degrees south across the equator to 30 degrees
north.
They compiled temperature records reaching back nearly half a millennium
from three sources: ice cores, tree rings and coral reefs.
They found the longest sustained period of cooling of sea surfaces - to a
depth of one metre - occurred in the early 1800s following the eruption of
Mount Tambora on the Indonesia island of Sumbawa.
Tambora blew its top in 1815 and was the most powerful eruption in
recorded history, ejecting about 50 cubic kilometres of magma, according
to the US Geological Survey (USGS).
However, links between volcanic activity and cooler ocean surfaces
weakened in the 20th century, apparently as a result of global warming
from the burning of fossil fuels, the researchers say. (AFP)
Another study heavily dependent on treemometers... looks like the
divergence problem striking again as their nice little associations fall
apart through the Twentieth Century.
Vegetation
Fire Emissions And Their Impact on Air Pollution And Climate By Langmann
et al. 2009 - Yet another paper has appeared that documents the role
of vegetation as a first order climate forcing. It is Langmann et al.,
2009: Vegetation fire emissions and their impact on air pollution and
climate. Atmospheric Environment, Volume 43, Issue 1, 107-116.
The abstract reads: “Gaseous and particulate emissions from vegetation
fires substantially modify the atmospheric chemical composition, degrade
air quality and can alter weather and climate. The impact of vegetation
fire emissions on air pollution and climate has been recognised in the
late 1970s. The application of satellite data for fire-related studies in
the beginning of the 21th century represented a major break through in our
understanding of the global importance of fires. Today the location and
extent of vegetation fires, burned area and emissions released from fires
are determined from satellite products even though many uncertainties
persist. Numerous dedicated experimental and modeling studies contributed
to improve the current knowledge of the atmospheric impact of vegetation
fires. The motivation of this paper is to give an overview of vegetation
fire emissions, their environmental and climate impact, and what
improvements can be expected in the near future.” (Roger Pielke Sr.,
Climate Science)
Seawater
science can help climate change forecasts - SINGAPORE - A team of
scientists has come up with a new definition of seawater which is set to
boost the accuracy of projections for oceans and climate.
Oceans help regulate the planet's weather by shifting heat from the
equator to the poles. Changes in salinity and temperature are major forces
driving global currents as well as circulation patterns from the surface
to the seabed.
Understanding exactly how much heat the ocean can absorb and accounting
for tiny differences in salinity are crucial for scientists to figure how
oceans affect climate and how that interaction could change because of
global warming.
"Getting these circulations right is central to the task of
quantifying the ocean's role in climate change," said Trevor
McDougall of Australia's state-backed research body the CSIRO, who is part
of the international team that updated the methods to define sea water.
He said the new definition allows for the first time to accurately
calculate ocean heat content and take into account small differences in
salinity. Previous methods assumed the composition of seawater was the
same around the globe. (Reuters)
Bad
news for bears - Polar bears in the Beaufort Sea region of the Arctic
are finding it increasingly difficult to find food during springtime,
suggests a new study. (Nature Reports Climate Change)
Why? Probably because the poor buggers are being endlessly harassed
by researchers chasing them in helicopters & nailing them with dart
guns (but hey, gotta do something to get a slice of that gorebull
warming funding largess, no?).
Scientist
adjusts data -- presto, Antarctic cooling disappears - "New
research presented at the AGU today suggests that the entire Antarctic
continent may have warmed significantly over the past 50 years. The study
... calls into question existing lines of evidence that show the region
has mostly cooled over the past half-century. ... (Heliogenic Climate
Change)
Sunspot data
vital clue to climate change - New discoveries linking periodic
changes in the Sun’s magnetic field with global weather patterns could
enable scientists to gain a clearer understanding of how additional
factors – such as greenhouse gases – contribute to those weather
patterns.
A newly-published paper by the University of New England’s Dr Robert
Baker establishes the connection between solar cycles and the weather by
correlating sunspot activity and rainfall figures for south-eastern
Australia over the past 130 years.
Cycles of sunspot activity are a visible indication of the periodic
changes in magnetic forces within the Sun. The most well-known sunspot
cycle is the 11-year “Schwab” cycle, which comprises alternating
five-and-a-half-year periods of relatively high and low sunspot activity.
Dr Baker’s paper, “Exploratory analysis of similarities in solar cycle
magnetic phases with Southern Oscillation Index fluctuations in Eastern
Australia” (Geographical Research, December 2008), shows that periods of
increased sunspot activity are consistently associated with those periods
of high rainfall in south-eastern Australia predicted by the Southern
Oscillation Index (SOI). Periods of drought, such as that which has
afflicted Australia for the past six years, are associated with minimal
sunspot activity. (Insciences)
Blame
the Sun for a Cloudy Day? - An Australian researcher has linked the
sun's magnetic activity to rainfall patterns in his country over the past
century. The connection is solid enough that meteorologists might be able
to use it to make better long-term weather predictions. But experts remain
cautious about the wider implications of the findings.
Scientists have long known that the sun plays a key role in Earth's
weather patterns. For example, the number of sunspots on its surface--dark
zones of intense magnetic activity--peaks about every 11 years, followed
by a period of dormancy. The cycle causes swings in sea-surface
temperatures--more sunspots mean warmer oceans, and fewer mean chillier
waters--but the effect is small. There's also a 22-year cycle, in which
the sun changes the polarity of its magnetic field, but it's unclear how
that phenomenon affects Earth. (ScienceNOW Daily News)
What
we've learned in 2008 - Amanda Leigh Mascarelli looks at how far our
understanding of climate change has come in the past twelve months.
(Nature Reports Climate Change)
What they've learned? Apparently squat!
Obama
Should Forget About Energy Independence - The only way to get there is
job-killing taxes.
This week in Chicago, President-elect Barack Obama introduced key members
of his new energy and environmental team and gave a statement expressing
his administration's ambitious goal to make America energy independent.
While his desire to do so is sincere, such a strategy would be disastrous
for our economy.
The platitude of "energy independence" makes zero economic
sense. Yes, it's true that many nations that supply us with oil are run by
anti-American governments. But unfortunately embargoes don't overturn
despotic regimes. More often than not they harden them, as in Zimbabwe,
North Korea and Cuba. Since the U.S. is so reliant on oil, embargoes will
hurt the U.S. as much, if not more, than the countries of OPEC. The issue
of how to handle the anti-American nature of oil-exporting nations is not
for the Commerce Department, but for the White House, the State Department
and perhaps the Department of Defense.
The U.S. currently imports some 60% of the oil we use. To imagine an
energy-independent U.S. today is to envision gas at $20 or more per gallon
and a true depression. President Dwight D. Eisenhower tried oil import
tariffs in the 1950s, as has every president since. Yet never before has
America's reliance on foreign oil been greater than it is now. (Auther B.
Laffer, Wall Street Journal)
Chu on China -
“China’s addition of 90GW of coal-fired power plants installed in 2006
alone is expected to emit over 500 million tons of CO2 per year for their
40 year lifetimes. This is (sic) compared to the entire European Union’s
Kyoto reduction commitment of 300 million tons of CO2.”—From Dr.
Steven Chu’s congressional testimony March 2007. President-elect Barack
Obama has nominated Dr. Chu to become Secretary of Energy. (Cooler Heads
Digest)
EIA
Predicts Greener America - The Earth's city lights at night. The
brightest areas of the Earth are the most urbanized, but not necessarily
the most populated.
-Use less oil
-Cut carbon dioxide emissions
-Drastically increase energy from renewables
-Reduce reliance on foreign imports
Sound like an environmentalist’s Christmas wish list? It’s not. It’s
the Energy Information Administration’s latest estimates for U.S. energy
use through 2030. The 2009 version, released on Wednesday, contains some
significant changes from the previous year’s outlook.
The EIA predicts virtually no growth in U.S. oil consumption over the next
20 years. They credit this feat to a combination of events including:
increased automobile efficiency, increasing use of biofuels and a rebound
in oil prices after the world economy recovers from its current recession.
By 2030 they expect the price of crude to be back up to $130 per barrel in
2007 dollars ($189 per bbl in nominal dollars). (Seth Myers, Energy
Tribune)
LA To Try Solar Again?
- Los Angeles has a solar power measure on the ballot for the city
referendum this March. Measure B, titled “Green Energy and Good Jobs for
Los Angeles,” would require the LA Department of Water and Power to
build 400 megawatts of distributed generation on publicly owned rooftops.
The LA Times reports today that Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller
warned that the solar measure could result in "substantial
increases" to the electricity bills of DWP customers. In 2000, L.A.
announced it would become the "Solar Capital of the World," with
solar panels on 100,000 rooftops by 2010. Three years and $80 million
later the city cancelled the project as cost-ineffective, 99,400 buildings
short of its goal. (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
EC
orders asset sale as price for EDF British Energy deal - The European
Commission will force a sell-off of assets in return for approving
Electricité de France's £12.5bn acquisition of British Energy.
EDF must sell its non-nuclear power plant at Sutton Bridge and another
owned by British Energy at Eggborough to overcome competition objections,
the commission ruled yesterday.
The state-controlled French utility must also agree to sell minimum
amounts of electricity in the UK wholesale market, dispose of land at
either Dungeness or Heysham that could be used to build a new nuclear
power station, and end one of its three connection agreements with
National Grid.
In return, EDF will avoid a drawn-out inquiry into its acquisition of
Britain's biggest electricity provider in a deal that will put it at the
forefront of UK nuclear power development. (The Independent)
Bentley
plan to cut CO2 with ethanol comes under fire - Bentley, the
British-based luxury carmaker owned by Germany's Volkswagen, reckons
biofuels are the key to cutting its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on the
way to a greener future.
In the short to medium term, this means embracing ethanol as the main
so-called renewable fuel. But, unfortunately for Bentley and the likes of
GM, the science points increasingly to this being a dead-end street. Some
experts reckon this push for ethanol shows Bentley needs a quick and cheap
way to at least appear to be improving fuel economy. (Detroit News)
We
Wouldn’t Touch You With a 39 1/2 Foot Pole, Mr. Goreinch (The
Chilling Effect)
Disease
— is it just a state of mind and bad energy? - The bigger story’s
been missed. No one has put the pieces together. Two medical news stories
this month may have appeared to be completely unrelated, but they had
everything to do with each other. What they forewarn may be the most
important message of all for the future of our healthcare. (Junkfood
Science)
In
America, Millions Breathe Too Much Soot - More than 100 million people
living in 46 metropolitan areas of the United States are breathing air
that has become fouled with too much soot on some days, and now those
cities have to clean up their air, the federal Environmental Protection
Agency said Monday.
The EPA added 15 cities to the sooty air list, mostly in states not
usually thought of as pollution-prone, such as Alaska, Utah, Idaho and
Wisconsin. That probably is because of the prevalence of wood stoves in
western and northern regions, a top EPA official said.
But environmentalists said the EPA was doing only half its job on
soot-laden areas, letting off the hook some southern cities with long-term
soot problems, such as Houston, Texas.
The EPA notified elected officials in 211 counties in 25 states that their
air violated newly tightened daily standards for fine particles of
pollution from diesel-burning trucks, power plants, wood-burning stoves
and other sources. Those particles, often called soot, can cause breathing
and heart problems. (AP)
Was a time, not very long ago, when everybody suffered much
higher soot level exposures than those complained about by those trying
to impose on us all test-tube pure air (which has never existed in
nature). Time to ask, are we better off now that they were in the era of
candles, lanterns and outdoor plumbing?
Revision
Run Amok - The paper of record blames the "mortgage bonfire"
on President Bush and his "laissez-faire" housing policies. But
to get there, the Times completely ignored history prior to 2002. (IBD)
Exercising
my god-given right to water - The United Nations' new "senior
advisor on water"—a Canadian woman named Maude Barlow—says
everybody has a right to water.
What that means, I guess, is that I have a right to take a bucket down to
Whiskey Creek—a mile away—and carry home enough water to drink (after
I boiling it to kill any bacteria left in the stream by the local deer and
raccoons). If Whiskey Creek should dry up in a drought, I'd have the right
to go even further, to the Shenandoah River, for my God-given water, or
perhaps even to the Chesapeake Bay.
That's better than the old days, when my village would have had to fight
other villages for the right to water holes or local streams, but it's not
much comfort to my wife. She's gotten used to having clean, safe water
come out of the tap in the kitchen and bath. (Dennis T. Avery, Enter Stage
Right)
December 22, 2008
This year's Grinch Award goes to... Greenpeace, for their efforts
terrorizing children:
Now, personally, I have doubts about the authenticity of such a
stupid piece of propaganda so, if not, then the award should be for
creative and all-too-plausible disinformation. Either way parents need
to be warned this crap is waiting in ambush for their children on
youtube.
More in a similar vein: Hot
Propaganda - coming soon to a TV near you (Watts Up With That?)
Ho,
Ho, Ho: Green Santa Has Some Seeing Red - If you’ve got rugrats of a
certain age, you don’t have to wait till January to gauge the
country’s new environmental tenor. Just watch your kid’s school
Christmas play.
“Santa Goes Green” is the theme of elementary-school productions
across the country, apparently involving plans to retool Santa’s sleigh
into a more efficient electric model and getting Rudolph’s nose up to
code, efficiency-wise. That’s got some people grinchlike already, by the
looks of it:
I was not prepared when I was tricked into sitting through a half hour
long political statement on “Global Warming.” I was not appreciative
that my grand-daughter is being taught this unproven theory of mankind
destroying the Earth, and that even Santa must do something to prevent its
self-destruction.
Actually, Santa’s role is key. In a new children’s book with the same
title, a little boy eschews toys and urges Santa Claus to throw his
considerable weight behind the global warming fight in order to save his
(presumably herbivorous) polar bear friend. ( Keith Johnson, WSJ)
Speaking of nonsense propaganda: Met
Office warn of 'catastrophic' rise in temperature - A new study by the
Met Office warns that the world could warm by more than 5C in the next 90
years, if emissions keep on rising. This would be catastrophic for the
environment and for humanity. Dr Vicky Pope, Head of Climate Change Advice
at the Met Office’s Hadley Centre explains the science (The Times)
Partly correct, at least: We
need to prepare for climate change that's inevitable - The state has
taken historic steps to combat global warming. But even if our efforts to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions are successful, there is growing
scientific evidence that some climate change will nevertheless take place.
We need to start preparing to adapt to this inevitability. ( Louise
Bedsworth and Ellen Hanak, Mercury News)
No matter what humans do the climate will change and we must adapt or
die. Pretty simple, isn't it -- why can't everybody see it?
Reply to
RealClimate’s Attacks on the NIPCC Climate Report - On November 28,
the global warming alarmist Web site “RealClimate” posted a
ridiculously lame attack by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt against
“Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate,” the summary for
policymakers of the 2008 report of the Nongovernmental International Panel
on Climate Change (NIPCC).
The NIPCC report was written by S. Fred Singer, Ph.D. and an additional 23
contributors, including some of the most accomplished atmospheric
scientists in the world. The paper references approximately 200 published
papers and scientific reports in support of its conclusions. It provides
strong evidence that human activity is not causing a global warming
crisis. ( Joseph L. Bast and James M. Taylor, The Heartland Institute)
The
so-called consensus on global warming is melting - News reports from
last week's UN Climate Change Summit in Poland told us global warming is
"a ticking time bomb" bringing "death and destruction"
to the world. Others suggested Arctic ice levels are at their lowest point
ever and may disappear entirely by 2015, CO2 levels are 10 per cent higher
than what is safe and basic survival will force polar bears to give up
their tasty staple of seal meat for "scrambled eggs" from the
nests of snow geese. (Those who've attempted to convert a cat to new food
will understand the potential difficulties in explaining this to the polar
bears.)
Fittingly, self-proclaimed climate expert Al Gore called the situation
"the equivalent of a five-alarm fire that has to be addressed
immediately."
The only thing more significant to the future of our planet than the
"five-alarm fire" reported from the conference is --what we
weren't told. (Susan Martinuk, Calgary Herald)
Follow
up to Questions on Deaths from Extreme Cold and Extreme Heat - The
post The Deadliest U.S. Natural Hazard: Extreme Cold has generated a
number of questions. Mr.. Goklany has graciously supplied a followup which
I have posted below. - Anthony (Watts Up With That?)
From the virtual realm: Stronger
coastal winds due to climate change may have far-reaching effects -
Future increases in wind strength along the California coast may have
far-reaching effects, including more intense upwelling of cold water along
the coast early in the season, "dead zones" in coastal waters,
and increased fire danger in Southern California, according to researchers
at the Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory at the University of
California, Santa Cruz. (Media-Newswire.com)
On what planet? UN
climate talks reveal growing global consensus - Former opponents
coming around to fight climate change
POZNAN, Poland — If one message has emerged from the long and often
tortuous hours of climate negotiations in recent years, it is this: In the
end, progress is being made.
The level of international ambition to deal with climate change is
growing, as was evident at the latest round of UN climate talks, which
ended Friday in Poland. It's happening despite a range of obstacles—and
sometimes even because of them.
The looming economic crisis has raised widespread fears that the costs of
achieving deep greenhouse gas cuts might be intolerable, at least in the
short term, as families struggle to pay mortgages and heat their homes.
But nations including the United States, under President-elect Barack
Obama, have responded by promising to use economic stimulus packages to
push green technology and create green jobs.
Under what UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon is calling a green New Deal,
laid-off employees are expected to be put to work insulating houses rather
than building dams, and companies manufacturing solar panels and efficient
cars will get government investment. ( Laurie Goering, Chicago Tribune)
With failing
hands, we drop the climate-change torch - Is there a changing of the
guard on climate change? Or no guard at all?
I was in Germany last week, on a tour organized by a non-profit company
called Inwent and funded by the German government.
It let a small group from Canada and the United States meet with
government and business people involved in the country's booming
renewable-energy industry.
Germany is far ahead of Canada in developing wind, solar and other
alternatives to oil, natural gas and coal. It's pushing ahead with wind
power even though its wind resource is poor. It leads the world in solar
power, despite incessantly leaden skies. It's working hard to bring heat
from four kilometres underground to create steam that will drive
electricity generators, although that resource, too, is low-grade compared
to the thermal potential in other parts of the world.
All this was a source of great pride among the people we met.
But then came news from Brussels, where German Chancellor Angela Merkel
and the leaders of Europe's 26 other nations were hammering out a
climate-change agreement.
Merkel, until now a champion of tough action to reduce greenhouse-gas
emissions, was suddenly "Frau Nein," warning that Germany would
lose key industries if climate rules were too tough. (Peter Gorrie,
Toronto Star)
Well Pete, we certainly hope this nonsense is in its death throes.
Unfortunately:
Likely
Obama Appointee Includes Climate Change Alarmist John Holdren - On the
heels of creating a new position for the scandal-plagued and therefore,
presumably, unconfirmable Carol Browner to lord over Senate-confirmed
cabinet officials in pursuit of the global-warming agenda, the former
employer of leading global warming alarmist Dr. John Holdren reports that
he “appears to be President-elect Barack Obama’s choice for science
adviser.” (Chris Horner, OpenMarket)
Federal
energy policy shift likely to be seismic - WASHINGTON— Many
environmentalists are downright giddy.
The election of Barack Obama, and his selection of what the League of
Conservation Voters’ Gene Karpinski calls the “dream green team” to
fashion energy and environmental policy, heralds a dramatic shift from the
energy priorities of the last eight years, on issues ranging from offshore
drilling to climate change. ( Houston Chronicle)
Flawed
Science Advice for Obama? - Does being spectacularly wrong about a
major issue in your field of expertise hurt your chances of becoming the
presidential science advisor? Apparently not, judging by reports from
DotEarth and ScienceInsider that Barack Obama will name John P. Holdren as
his science advisor on Saturday. [UPDATE: Mr. Obama did indeed pick Dr.
Holdren.] ( John Tierney, New York Times)
Holdren's Hysterical
Quotes - The scientific community can certainly help develop new
technologies to cope with the problems, he said, but with the pace of
climate change increasing so rapidly, "we've only got about a decade
to get things right." ( Julie Walsh, CEI)
Can't say you weren't warned: Obama
names 4 top members of science team - WASHINGTON — President-elect
Barack Obama's selection Saturday of a Harvard physicist and a marine
biologist for science posts is a sign he plans a more aggressive response
to global warming than did the Bush administration.
John Holdren and Jane Lubchenco are leading experts on climate change who
have advocated forceful government action. Holdren will become Obama's
science adviser as director of the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy. Lubchenco will lead the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, which oversees ocean and atmospheric studies
and does much of the government's research on global warming. (AP)
Obama's
choices for science advisors - global warming advocates - According to
Glenn Reynolds, one of the advisors actually believed at one time that
economics should play no role in climate change policy. John Holden,
tapped to be Obama's science advisor, is also a disciple of discredited
population alarmist Paul Ehrlich: (Rick Moran, American Thinker)
Meet
the New Climate Change Kid on the Block - Barack Obama announced his
new energy team at a press conference Monday, sending a subtle slap down
to President Bush by saying his administration would "value
science" and "make decisions based on the facts." (David N.
Bass, American Spectator)
The ETS:
Completely unnecessary - Rudd has failed to see through the vested
interests that promote anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that
human emissions of carbon cause global warming. Though masquerading as
"science based", the promoters of AGW have a medieval outlook
and are in fact anti-science. Meanwhile carbon is innocent, and the
political class is plunging ahead with making us poorer because they do
not understand what science really is or what the real science is. (David
Evans, Unleashed)
Middle
class still not sold on climate change - "I CAN'T for the life of
me see why we should be paying for something that won't make a jot of
difference.
"India, China, Brazil, Indonesia. They won't contribute. So we go
first. I just can't see why." (The Australian)
And the correct answer is that politicians have been intimidated by
or are in thrall to the people haters. At no point has it ever had
anything to do with the global climate.
Jim
Hansen’s AGU presentation: “He’s ‘nailed’ climate forcing for 2x
CO2″ - I received this presentation of the “Bjerknes
Lecture” that Dr. James Hansen gave at the annual meeting of the
American Geophysical Union on December 17th. There are the usual things
one might expect in the presentation, such as this slide which shows 2008
on the left with the anomalously warm Siberia and the Antarctic peninsula:
(Watts Up With That?)
Really? Man-Made
Global Warming Supposedly Began 5,000 Years Ago - Researchers from the
University of Wisconsin-Madison, using supercomputers and advanced climate
models have hypothesised that human actions started causing global warming
between 5,000 and 8,000 years ago. (Brett Anderson, AccuWeather)
We haven't done much of a job of it then. Try a search like this
and see the planet was warmer 5,000-8,000 before present and has
predominantly cooled over the last 5,000 years.
“relatively
unknown Maryland scientist” wants to patent the swamp cooler to combat
global warming - This just in, (h/t to Sonicfrog) the swamp cooler is
being re-invented as a global warming solution. No mention of what the
increased global humidity will do for the planet’s radiative balance. No
mention of what the increased humidity would do for night-time low
temperatures. (Watts Up With That?)
Geoengineering:
a bad idea whose time may come - Yesterday, at the annual meeting of
the American Geophysical Union (AGU), climate change scientists discussed
the risks and benefits of deliberately altering Earth's climate through
"geoengineering". One measure of the concern scientists have
about Earth's climate could be gauged by the standing-room only crowd of
200 that packed the presentation room. The eleven speakers at the session
laid out some radical and dangerous ideas for deliberately altering
Earth's climate. They uniformly cautioned that the uncertainties and
dangers of implementing any of these schemes was high, but that
geoengineering may be necessary if efforts to control greenhouse gases
fail and the climate begins to undergo rapid and destructive changes.
(Jeff Masters, Weather Underground)
Polar
Albedo Feedback - Today is a day of note in Antarctic. The sun has
reached it’s highest point in the sky, and never sets. The amount of
incoming solar radiation is at it’s peak for the year, and the radiation
balance is strongly affected by the reflectivity (albedo) of the surface.
Open ocean absorbs much of the the sunlight, whereas ice reflects it back
out into space.
One of the most popular global warming feedbacks is considered to be
changes in the extent of polar ice. The story goes that as the ice melts,
more heat gets absorbed in the ocean, leading to higher temperatures.
Today we test that theory. (Watts Up With That?)
Current
Climate Impact of Heating From Energy Usage By A.T.J. de Laat 2008 - A
new paper has just been published in EOS Transactions Forum. de Laat,
A.T.J., 2008: Current Climate Impact of Heating from Energy Usage. EOS
Transactions FORUM, Vol. 89, No. 51, doi: 10.1029/2008EO510005, 16
December 2008. ( Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
The
CO2 - Temperature link - More words on the topic first presented here:
I wrote:
It appears from this graph that CO2 concentrations follows
temperature with approx 6-9 months. The interesting part is off course
that the CO2 trends so markedly responds to temperature changes.
To some, this is “not possible” as we normally see a very smooth
rise on CO2 curves. However, the difference in CO2 rise from year to year
is quite different from warm to cold years, and as shown differences are
closely dependent on global temperatures. Take a closer look: (Watts Up
With That?)
Will
Canada see its first white Christmas since '71? - The first day of
winter brought wind-chill warnings, snow and a bevy of storms to cities
across Canada on Sunday, potentially laying the groundwork for the first
cross-country white Christmas in nearly four decades.
Environment Canada senior climatologist David Phillips told CTV Newsnet
that "it looks like a very good chance" it will be a white
Christmas for all parts of Canada for the first time since 1971.
"It's just sort of the beginning of winter, and it's a little much to
expect when we have so many different climatic types in this country for
it to be frozen and snow-covered from right across the huge country,"
he told CTV Newsnet on Sunday.
But with so much snow already on the ground, the veteran weather
prognosticator said he thinks that any upcoming balmy Christmas Day
temperatures will not be able to melt away the growing snowfall base.
"It may be in 40 years, the first one," he said. (CTV.ca News)
Swiss glaciers
shrinking faster - Two new studies presented at the latest American
Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco 15-19 December show that Swiss
glaciers are shrinking, and shrinking at an increasingly rapid rate. This
means that researchers are observing the same phenomena in the Alps that
have already been reported in the Himalayas and in the Andes.
Swiss glaciers are melting away at an accelerating rate and many will
vanish this century if climate projections are correct, two new studies
suggest.
One assessment found that some 10 cubic km of ice have been lost from
1,500 glaciers over the past nine years.
The other study, based on a sample of 30 representative glaciers,
indicates the group’s members are now losing a metre of thickness every
year. Both pieces of work come out of the Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology.
“The trend is negative, but what we see is that the trend is also
steepening,” said Matthias Huss from the Zurich university’s
Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology.
The investigators reported that there has been no measured change in
snowfall accumulation, which when combined with melt rates, determines a
glacier’s mass balance. Rather the melting away of the Swiss glaciers is
attributed entirely to a longer melt season resulting from global warming.
(People and Planet)
Rumors
of the Death of Arctic Sea Ice Greatly Exaggerated - Even if polar
bears really are drowning, the melt is likely a natural, not man-made,
phenomenon.
Mark Twain, ever the wry observer of human nature, once famously quipped
that “everybody complains about the weather, but nobody ever does
anything about it.” (Actually, Twain was quoting the essayist and
novelist Charles Dudley Warner, but the colorful humorist gets credit for
the line.) Whoever deserves the credit, the point was that there is a
folly to human arrogance and some things cannot be “fixed,” are
outside of the powers of man. The weather, for example, is governed by
forces beyond human control.
But the arrogance of the race is boundless, and there are those who
actually believe that man is in the process of destroying the Earth’s
weather, or at least climate. Al Gore, the leader of the Gang Green,
tramps about the planet in his fuel-guzzling, greenhouse gas-spewing jets
to tell people that the world is burning — his speeches are usually
given on days of bitter cold — because they are living too extravagantly
by, well, heating their homes when cold and driving their cars to work.
James Hansen of NASA gives hysterical lectures to Congress and the news
media, claiming we face fire and brimstone. Repeatedly we have been told
we have ten years left, starting in the 1980s; much like those old
end-of-the-world preachers, the date for the end time keeps extending.
In short, there are people who believe that, yes indeedy, we can do
something about the weather, or at least the climate. If we just live more
frugally, share our wealth, eat lots of natural foods like tofu and pine
nuts, and hold hands while visualizing world peace, we can bring carbon
dioxide and methane levels down and the world will become a pastoral
paradise. ( Timothy Birdnow, Pajamas Media)
The
Sun controls the Earth's climate (Popular Technology)
Made a spectacularly early start on the eggnog? Environment
Ohio Warns State Economy Vulnerable to Climate Change - COLUMBUS,
Ohio, December 18, 2008 - Global warming could potentially damage Ohio
economic sectors now worth $126.9 billion that provide 1.9 million jobs,
according to a new report issued today by the environmental advocacy group
Environment Ohio.
Entitled "What's at Stake: How Global Warming Threatens the Buckeye
State," the report details the environmental and economic harms that
may result from Ohio's changing climate.
"It's not just about the polar bears and Arctic ice-caps
anymore," said Amy Gomberg, Environment Ohio's program director.
"Climate change poses threats to Ohio's environment that could have a
negative impact on our economy, as well." (ENS)
Sheesh! A
Crude Reality - Canada's Oil Sands and Pollution - The United States
and Canada enjoy one of the largest trading partnerships in the world,
with energy serving as a vital component of that relationship. Canada
exports 1.96 million barrels of oil per day to the United States,
according to the Energy Information Administration. While Canada also
supplies a large amount of clean hydropower to northern US regions, oil
exports to the United States are both more substantial and, recently, more
controversial. A large portion of Canadian oil coming to the United States
is extracted from the oil sands in Alberta at high cost to the
environment. With climate change becoming a vital global issue, many US
leaders have begun to criticize Canada for sanctioning the dirty oil
extraction process. Although this criticism has not yet translated into a
serious decline in the US-Canada relationship, Canada will have to improve
its environmental standards for the oil sands in order to maintain healthy
dealings with its southern neighbor. (Anna Hopper, HIR)
Shaw Group Urges
Commitment to Nuclear Power - The Shaw Group Inc.'s J.M. Bernhard Jr.
called for a national commitment to build up to 50 nuclear power plants by
2030, telling a gathering of power industry leaders that the jobs, clean
electricity, and energy independence created by a "nuclear
renaissance" offer a unique platform to achieve the "hope and
change" pledged by President-elect Barack Obama.
"If this nation and the Obama administration are truly serious about
controlling global warming, nuclear power must maintain its 20 percent
share of U.S. power generation," said Bernhard, Shaw's chair,
president, and chief executive officer, during a keynote address at the
Power-Gen International 2008 trade show in Orlando, Fla. "That will
require the construction of 45 to 50 new nuclear plants by 2030, while
also maintaining operation of the current fleet."
Such a commitment, he said, would have the support of most Americans.
"Almost 70 percent of Americans favor the construction of new nuclear
plants," Bernhard said. "That level of public opinion has never
been higher." (Environmental Protection)
RWE Says To Build German
Offshore Wind Farm - FRANKFURT - German utility RWE AG plans to build
its first offshore wind farm, a 2.8 billion euro ($4.03 billion) project,
one that adds it to the ranks of would-be operators off Germany's North
Sea coast.
RWE's renewable energy arm, RWE Innogy, said in a statement on Friday it
had acquired project company Enova Energieanlagen with a view to
installing about 1,000 megawatts (MW) of wind power generation capacity 40
km north of the island of Juist.
The initial preparation work could start in 2010, provided approval was
obtained in 2009, and first production could begin from 2011, it said. The
plan would be completed in 2015. (Reuters)
Evidence-based
childhood obesity programs — another case of mistaken definition -
We hear a lot about “evidence-based medicine” but we never seem to
hear much of the actual evidence. Did you hear about the latest systematic
review of the clinical evidence on treatments for childhood obesity?
It was just published the current issue of the Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology & Metabolism, the journal of The Endocrine Society. The
review was conducted by endocrinologists at Mayo Clinic College of
Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota, and led by Dr. Victor M. Montori, M.D.,
a renowned researcher in diabetes and who edited the book on
Evidence-based Endocrinology (Humana Press, 2005). (Junkfood Science)
Cosmetic
medicine — and you thought it was for your health - This week,
Johnson & Johnson filed its Securities and Exchange (SEC) tender offer
to acquire Mentor Corporation, with a reported $1.07 Billion bid.
Mentor [website Loveyourlook.com] is a leading supplier of silicon gel
breast implants and liposuction, and is awaiting FDA approval for its new
dermal filler and a botox type product for frown lines. Its cosmetic
surgery products will join J&J’s Ethicon division, strengthening its
worldwide presence in the aesthetic medicine market, according to
financial news reports. J&J, the 6th largest pharmaceutical company in
the world, and its Ethicon Endo-Surgery is also the world’s supplier for
the bariatric surgery gastric band, Realize. (Junkfood Science)
STATS:
Dubious Data Awards 2008 - Honoring some of the worst abuses of
statistics and science in the past year
STATS – The Statistical Assessment Service – is a non-partisan,
non-profit research group that analyzes the way science and statistics are
used in the media and public debate. It is affiliated with George Mason
University in Virginia .
More
than 54 million disabled in U.S., census says - WASHINGTON - More than
54 million U.S. residents, or about 19 percent of the population, have
some sort of disability, the U.S. Census Bureau reported on Thursday.
The numbers, based on 2005 data, are up slightly from the 2002 survey when
51.2 million people or 18 percent reported a disability, the census found.
About 46 percent of adults aged 21 to 64 with a disability were employed,
compared with 84 percent of adults without disabilities, the survey found.
(Reuters)
Looks more like you have a problem with the definition of
"disabled".
Canada
sets new limits on children's cold medicine - VANCOUVER, British
Columbia - Canadian health officials urged parents on Thursday not to give
over-the-counter cold medicines to children under the age of six, citing
concern over misuse and overdoses.
The federal health agency, Health Canada, which had earlier this year
recommended the medicines not be given to children less than two years
old, said there is limited evidence that the medications have any
effectiveness for young children. (Reuters)
Some
cough medicine overdoses deliberate: report - WASHINGTON - Some
children showing up in emergency rooms with overdoses of cough or cold
syrup may have been intentionally medicated to keep them quiet, doctors
cautioned on Thursday.
An analysis of 189 children who died from medication overdoses showed a
significant percentage appeared to have been intentionally overdosed, the
doctors reported in the Annals of Emergency Medicine. (Reuters)
Another huge error: Trade
Deals Must Protect Environment: Obama - WASHINGTON - The United
States will insist on strong protections for the environment and for
workers in future trade deals, President-elect Barack Obama said on Friday
as he introduced his nominee to be chief U.S. trade negotiator. (Reuters)
December 19, 2008
EPA Goes
Man-Hunting - It’s little wonder why the FBI’s “Most Wanted”
list doesn’t include anyone accused of breaking federal environmental
laws. It’s hard to argue that a father-son team accused of illegally
importing Alfa Romeo sports cars that don’t meet U.S. tailpipe emissions
standards is the criminal equivalent of the likes of Usama bin Laden or
the other hardened sociopaths for whom the FBI warns the public to remain
on the lookout.
But the Environmental Protection Agency has now cured its apparent case
of outlaw-envy with the launch of its own “Wanted”
list last week. Hoping to “track down environmental fugitives,”
the agency wants to “increase the number of ‘eyes’ looking for
environmental fugitives.”
In addition to the Alfa Romeo Gang believed to be hiding out in Italy
(so remain alert on your next visit to Tuscany), the EPA wants us to keep
an eye out for Mauro Valenzuela, an airplane mechanic criminally charged
for improperly loading oxygen canisters thought to have caused the tragic
1996 crash of ValuJet flight 592.
But converting the crash into an environmental crime seems a stretch.
The EPA apparently views the canister loading as “illegal transportation
of hazardous material.” In any event, Valenzuela’s boss and co-worker
were eventually acquitted of the same criminal counts. The only reason
Valenzuela also wasn’t acquitted was because he panicked and fled to
parts unknown before trial. He is, in effect, a fugitive from his own
innocence -- but he is wanted by the EPA nonetheless.
The rest of the EPA’s fugitives appear to be mostly hapless
immigrants now believed to be “hiding” oversees in places like Syria,
Mexico, India, Greece, Poland and China. They’re wanted for a variety of
alleged infractions, including smuggling banned refrigerants, discharging
waste into sewers, lying to the Coast Guard about a ship’s waste oil
management system, transporting hazardous waste without a manifest, and
creating false official documents.
While the EPA’s fugitives certainly appear to be a motley lot who may
have broken a variety of environmental regulations, often unwittingly, one
can’t help but wonder whether the EPA’s Wanted list is not only
over-the-top, but where the agency is headed. (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
Long overdue: Legal
move to crack down on climate protesters - The attorney general is
considering asking the courts to clamp down on high-profile, direct-action
protests on issues such as climate change, the Guardian can exclusively
reveal. (The Guardian)
I'm probably old and curmudgeonly but I'm fast coming round to the
opinion all terrorists (which by definition includes these misanthropic
green whack jobs) should be subject to lethal force.
Top
10 dud predictions - GLOBAL warming preachers have had a shocking
2008. So many of their predictions this year went splat.
Here's their problem: they've been scaring us for so long that it's now
possible to check if things are turning out as hot as they warned.
And good news! I bring you Christmas cheer - the top 10 warming
predictions to hit the wall this year. (Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun)
The
Deadliest U.S. Natural Hazard: Extreme Cold - Yesterday Reuters
reported on a study which claimed that heat is the deadliest form of
natural hazard for the United States. However, this result is based on
questionable data. The study used results for mortality from extreme heat
and cold that can be traced to the National Climatic Data Center. But
these data are substantially different from mortality data from the Center
for Disease Control (CDC) based on the Compressed Mortality File for the
United States. The latter uses death certificate records, which provide
the cause of each recorded death (based on medical opinion). It is
reasonable to believe that regarding the cause of death, particularly for
extreme cold and heat, medical opinion as captured in death certificate
records is more reliable than determinations made by the meteorologists in
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s NCDC (even if they
have Ph.Ds.).
Combining data from the CDC database for extreme cold and extreme heat,
and various arms of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
for floods, lightning, hurricanes, and tornadoes, I have shown elsewhere
that extreme cold, rather than heat, is the deadliest form of extreme
weather event. In fact, from 1979-2002, extreme cold was responsible for
53 percent of deaths due to all these categories of extreme weather, while
extreme heat contributes slightly more than half that (28%). For more, see
The
Deadliest U.S. Natural Hazard: Extreme Cold. (Indur Goklany, Cato @
Liberty)
ETS
a big pain for little gain - THE Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change model of dangerous, human-caused climate change has failed.
Independent science relevant to supposed human-caused global warming is
clear, and can be summarised in four brief points.
First, global temperature warmed slightly in the late 20th century and has
been cooling since 2002. Neither the warming nor the cooling were of
unusual rate or magnitude.
Second, humans have an effect on local climate but, despite the
expenditure of more than $US50 billion ($70 billion) looking for it since
1990, no globally summed human effect has ever been measured. Therefore,
any human signal must lie buried in the variability of the natural climate
system.
Third, we live on a dynamic planet; change occurs in Earth's geosphere,
biosphere, atmosphere and oceans all the time and all over the world. No
substantive evidence exists that modern rates of global environmental
change (ice volume; sea level) lie outside historic natural bounds.
Last, cutting carbon dioxide emissions, be it in Australia or worldwide,
will likely result in no measurable change in future climate, because
extra increments of atmospheric CO2 cause diminishing warming for each
unit of increase; at most, a few tenths of a degree of extra warming would
result from a completion of doubling of CO2 since pre-industrial times.
These facts notwithstanding, the Rudd Government is poised to introduce a
CO2 taxation bill on doubly spurious grounds. It presumes, first, that
dangerous warming caused by human emissions is occurring, or will shortly
occur. And, second, that cuts to emissions will prevent significant
amounts of future warming.
There is, therefore, now a dramatic disjunction between scientific reality
and the stranglehold that global warming alarmism has on planned
Australian climate policy. (Bob Carter, The Australian)
RUMINANT
ANIMALS NOT KYOTO VILLAINS (.pdf) - Dr Gerrit van der LIngen explains
why emissions of methane from cattle and sheep should not be part of any
emissions trading system in New Zealand. According to MAF, 98.7% of
agricultural methane comes from ruminant enteric fermentation, released by
burping; and is part of a natural closed loop that has nothing to do with
fossil sequestered carbon. (NZ Climate Science)
A
Glimpse Inside the Global Warming Controversy - “Do you believe in
Global Warming?” I have often been asked this question by people with
little or no scientific background. It seems like a simple question that
demands a “yes” or “no” answer. But in reality it is a complex
question that cannot be reduced to an unqualified “yea” or “nay”.
The intent of this paper is not to resolve this question by rallying
evidence for or against Global Warming (as if that can be done in a few
pages!), but rather to lay bare the complexity of the climate change
issue. Those who come to appreciate this fact will likely agree that
simple answers are not only bad education, but can lead to bad policies.
The controversy surrounding global warming is not centered so much on the
increase in global temperature over the last 150 years, but on the primary
cause of this increase—natural, human, or a combination of the two. The
theory in question is called Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).
There is actually more than one AGW theory, and they vary considerably as
to the causes and extent of human induced climate change. The most
prevalent model is based on projections from the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It is this version of
the AGW hypothesis that has become the focus of so much controversy.
(William DiPuccio, SPPI)
Coral
blooms as warming fears wither - Corals turn out to just love this
global warming, after all: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
CNN
Meteorologist: Manmade Global Warming Theory 'Arrogant' - Network's
second meteorologist to challenge notion man can alter climate.
Unprecedented snow in Las Vegas has some scratching their heads – how
can there be global warming with this unusual winter weather?
CNN Meteorologist Chad Myers had never bought into the notion that man can
alter the climate and the Vegas snowstorm didn’t impact his opinion.
Myers, an American Meteorological Society certified meteorologist,
explained on CNN’s Dec. 18 “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that the whole idea
is arrogant and mankind was in danger of dying from other natural events
more so than global warming. (Jeff Poor, Business & Media Institute)
Evaluation
of Near Term Hurricane Loss Predictions - Karen Clark and Company has
released an interesting report (PDF and covered here) that compares the
performance of catastrophe models from AIR (the company that Clark formed
and ileft a few years ago), RMS, and EQE over the past three years with
their five year predictions of losses. Here is what they’ve found:
(Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Kyoto Veteran Has Deja
Vu - Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner was present at the Kyoto negotiations back
in 1997, and predicted their failure because of the inability to get the
developing nations like China to commit to emissions reductions. He has
recently returned from the Poznan Conference of the Parties aimed at
drawing up Kyoto II, and is of the opinion that nothing has been learned
from history. He has set out his concerns in a letter to President-elect
Obama, copied in the full post. (Iain Murray, Cooler Heads)
EU
climate bill ushers in hard year of talks - The world’s most
stringent climate change package was approved by the European parliament
on Wednesday, setting the scene for the toughest talks ever undertaken on
climate change.
A packed year of international negotiations on climate change culminates
in a crunch meeting next December in Copenhagen, at which 190 countries
will gather to forge an agreement on cutting emissions that will replace
the Kyoto protocol when its main provisions expire in 2012.
The clearing of the European Union’s final hurdle means the bloc is now
committed to cutting its greenhouse gas emissions 20 per cent from 1990
levels by 2020; generating at least 20 per cent of its energy from
renewable sources by 2020; and committing billions of euros in funding to
develop carbon capture and storage technology.
Many parliamentarians complained that changes to the emissions trading
system at the centre of the package were too generous to corporate
interests and that the legislation allowed member states to undertake most
of their emissions reductions outside of Europe. Nonetheless, they voted
in favour.
“Of course, it’s not a perfect agreement. But if we say ‘no’,
we’re left with nothing – with our arms empty,” said Lena Ek, a
liberal democrat from Sweden, echoing a common refrain. (Financial Times)
India,
China showed rare unity at climate change summit - Poznan (Poland):
The climate change summit may have ended in failure, but it showed rare
unity of purpose between India and China which took on the industrialised
world together at the closing moments of the climate summit here. The
Indian position also received support from Pakistan.
Knowing that developing countries had failed to get the industrialised
world to part with even one extra percent of their profits from carbon
trade, India started the note of dissent at the final session of the Dec
1-12 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
Industrialised countries led by the European Union, Japan, Canada,
Australia and Russia had refused to part with the money sought by
developing countries to help them cope with climate change effects. That
had happened behind closed doors. Then the Indian delegation chose to make
the matter public in a dramatic finale. (IANS)
CLIMATE CHANGE:
Indian Scientists Competent But Still at Sea - BANGALORE , Dec 18 -
The prestigious Indian Institute of Science (IISc), set up here in May
1909, is celebrating its centenary with year-long lectures and seminars,
some of which have revealed Indian science’s lack of coherence in
dealing with climate change in India.
At the turn of the IISc’s new century, scientists from the institution
and from elsewhere in India are still at the ‘discussions and debate’
stage of what should, or should not, constitute climate science for India.
Of the 20 Indian scientists who were part of the 2007 Nobel peace
prize-winning team of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), three were lead authors of various IPCC reports on
global warming and attached to the IISc. They were J. Srinivas, N.H.
Ravindranath and R. Sukumar.
An Indian, Rajendra Kumar Pachauri, has since 2002 been heading the IPCC,
which shared the Nobel with former United States presidential candidate Al
Gore for bringing global warming and climate change science to the
forefront of the world’s conscience.
But in spite of the considerable work they did on global warming, for the
IPCC reports, IISc’s scientists are yet to present a cogent scientific
argument for India that together tackles the spectrum of factors in
climate change. (IPS)
<chuckle> Coal-fired
generators escape the blacklist - FEW if any of Australia's 30
coal-fired power generators will be shut down by 2020 under the Federal
Government's scheme to reduce greenhouse gases by a target of 5 per cent,
according to the findings of its white paper made public this week.
About $3.9 billion will be handed out to the most-polluting generators in
the form of free permits to emit greenhouse gases under the scheme
announced by the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, on Monday. But modelling in
the Government's white paper on the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
shows there will be no significant reductions in carbon pollution from
coal-fired power stations by 2020 if the Government sticks to a target of
cutting emissions to 5 per cent below 2000 levels. (Sydney Morning Herald)
Stupid game. Carbon dioxide is not an atmospheric pollutant.
Regardless, K.Rudd is all talk and focus groups -- there won't be any
action.
2008 Tropical
Temperatures - The blog world is jump starting discussion of 2008
annual temperatures. Yesterday at 1:56 pm Eastern, NASA employee Gavin
Schmidt and climate modeler, purely in his "private" capacity,
posted an article arguing that the results were consistent with climate
models - an activity that lesser minds might think relates to his
employment.
Lucia commented here, perhaps redundantly, that Schmidt's comment was
"tendentious twaddle". (Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit)
Arctic
and Greenland Ice in the News Again - Changes Attributed to Man are
natural - In this
story, NASA scientists suggested between 1.5 trillion and 2 trillion
tons of ice in Greenland, Antarctica and Alaska have melted at an
accelerating rate since 2003, in the latest signs of what they say is
global warming. Using new satellite technology that measures changes in
mass in mountain glaciers and ice sheets, NASA geophysicist Scott Luthcke
concluded that the losses amounted to enough water to fill the Chesapeake
Bay 21 times in a paper presented at the AGU conference.
The data reflects findings from NASA colleague Jay Zwally, who uses
different satellite technology to observe changing ice volume in
Greenland, the Arctic and Antarctica. In the past five years, Greenland
has lost between 150 gigatons and 160 gigatons each year, (one gigaton
equals one billion tons) or enough to raise global sea levels about .5 mm
per year, said Zwally, who will also present his findings at the
conference this week. GRACE measured that mountain glaciers in the Gulf of
Alaska lost about 84 gigatons each year, about five times the average
annual flow of the Colorado River through the Grand Canyon, according to
Zwally.
The claims conflict with the reality that just recently glaciologist
Bruce Molnia reported a bitterly cold Alaskan summer following a
winter with extreme cold and record snows resulted in Alaska glaciers to
expand, rather than shrink for the first time in at least 250 years.
Also in 2007, NASA scientists reported that after years of research, their
team had assembled data showing that normal, decade-long changes in Arctic
Ocean currents driven by a circulation known as the Arctic Oscillation was
largely responsible for the major Arctic climate shifts observed over the
past several years. These periodic reversals in the ocean currents move
warmer and cooler water around to new places, greatly affecting the
climate. (Joseph D’Aleo, CCM, AMS Fellow)
‘Not Evil Just Wrong’:
Documentary Says ‘Propaganda Fueling Global Warming Hysteria’ -
"Despite the scientific consensus changing every few decades from
pending global warming to global cooling, the scientists and the media all
agree that whatever climate change they predicted - cooling or warming -
it would have catastrophic consequences for the planet." (Breitbart
TV)
Global warming
and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart - Abstract:
Speculations on the potential impact of climate change on human health
frequently focus on malaria. Predictions are common that in the coming
decades, tens – even hundreds – of millions more cases will occur in
regions where the disease is already present, and that transmission will
extend to higher latitudes and altitudes. Such predictions, sometimes
supported by simple models, are persuasive because they are intuitive, but
they sidestep factors that are key to the transmission and epidemiology of
the disease: the ecology and behaviour of both humans and vectors, and the
immunity of the human population. A holistic view of the natural history
of the disease, in the context of these factors and in the precise setting
where it is transmitted, is the only valid starting point for assessing
the likely significance of future changes in climate. (Malaria Journal
2008, 7(Suppl 1):S3doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S3)
Managing
Water Use From Forest Plantations By Jerome K. Vanclay - There is a
very important new paper on the role of land use on the climate, and other
aspects of the environment. It is Vanclay, J.K., 2009: Managing water use
from forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 257, 385–389.
(Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Nasa
set to launch 'CO2 hunter' - The US space agency is set to launch a
satellite that can map in detail where carbon dioxide is in the
atmosphere.
Nasa's Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) will pinpoint the key locations
on the Earth's surface where CO2 is being emitted and absorbed.
CO2 from human activities is thought to be driving climate changes, but
important facts about its movement through the atmosphere remain elusive.
The agency believes the technology on OCO can end some of the mysteries.
(BBC News)
Oh my... New
World post-pandemic reforestation helped start Little Ice Age, say
Stanford scientists - The power of viruses is well documented in human
history. Swarms of little viral Davids have repeatedly laid low the great
Goliaths of human civilization, most famously in the devastating pandemics
that swept the New World during European conquest and settlement.
In recent years, there has been growing evidence for the hypothesis that
the effect of the pandemics in the Americas wasn't confined to killing
indigenous peoples. Global climate appears to have been altered as well.
Stanford University researchers have conducted a comprehensive analysis of
data detailing the amount of charcoal contained in soils and lake
sediments at the sites of both pre-Columbian population centers in the
Americas and in sparsely populated surrounding regions. They concluded
that reforestation of agricultural lands-abandoned as the population
collapsed-pulled so much carbon out of the atmosphere that it helped
trigger a period of global cooling, at its most intense from approximately
1500 to 1750, known as the Little Ice Age.
"We estimate that the amount of carbon sequestered in the growing
forests was about 10 to 50 percent of the total carbon that would have
needed to come out of the atmosphere and oceans at that time to account
for the observed changes in carbon dioxide concentrations," said
Richard Nevle, visiting scholar in the Department of Geological and
Environmental Sciences at Stanford. Nevle and Dennis Bird, professor in
geological and environmental sciences, presented their study at the annual
meeting of the American Geophysical Union on Dec. 17, 2008. (Stanford
University)
... so, uh... the place should really be a fair bit warmer than it is
now? They are saying we are measuring warming which is really just a
recovery from artificially suppressed temperatures? Actually neither of
the above -- there is no useful support for the carbon dioxide-driven
global temperature hypothesis.
Good scams are so hard to find: Cheap
Government Deals May Undermine Carbon Market - LONDON - Recession
could fuel a scramble from rich nations to buy cheap emissions rights to
help them meet climate targets under the Kyoto Protocol, analysts say.
That would displace trade in wider emissions permits and especially a
market in carbon offsets which could be worth $25-30 billion to developing
countries by 2012.
The climate may also suffer unless revenues from the emerging trade in
sovereign emissions rights, called assigned amount units (AAUs), are spent
on good environmental causes. (Reuters)
Slump Means EU
Industry Carbon Caps No Longer Bite - LONDON - Recession will not lead
to a repeat collapse in European carbon prices, but plunging output means
factories and power plants will be able to meet their climate goals for up
to 10 years by buying carbon offsets.
The deepening threat of a serious recession has seen carbon analysts
scramble to adjust their forecasts, as tumbling manufacturing output will
cut carbon emissions, and therefore demand for and the price of carbon
emissions permits called EU allowances (EUAs). (Reuters)
On Obama's Interior,
Ag Picks - President-elect Barack Obama’s nominations of Senator Ken
Salazar to be Secretary of the Interior and of former Governor Tom Vilsack
to be Secretary of Agriculture complete a team that opposes affordable
energy. As Governor of Iowa, Mr. Vilsack was a leading promoter of the
ethanol boondoggle. Colorado Senator Salazar says he is for more oil
production on federal land, but has tried to stop one oil and gas project
after another on federal land in Colorado. (Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads
Digest)
Sunflower
seeks arguments on coal - Sunflower Electric Power Corp. has asked a
federal judge to allow oral arguments as it seeks to keep alive its $1.5
billion lawsuit against the state over a decision not to allow two
coal-fired plants in western Kansas.
In court papers filed Tuesday, the company asked U.S. District Judge Eric
Melgren to hold a hearing before ruling on its motion for a preliminary
injunction to keep the state from considering carbon-dioxide emissions in
any future proceedings on Sunflower's application for an air quality
permit for the Holcomb plants.
The Hays-based company also asked for oral arguments on the state's motion
to dismiss its lawsuit. (Associated Press)
Wrong: Oil
Is Not the Climate Change Culprit — It's All About Coal - SAN
FRANCISCO — Maybe your old truck isn't responsible for destroying the
planet after all.
New climate change scenarios quantify the idea that oil is only a small
component of the total global warming problem — the real problem is
coal.
If the world replaced all of its oil usage with carbon-neutral energy
sources, ecologist Kenneth Caldeira of Stanford University calculated that
it would only buy us about 10 years before coal emissions warmed the
planet to what many scientists consider dangerous levels.
"There's an order of magnitude more coal than oil. So, whether there
is a little more oil or a little less oil will change the details in, say,
when we reach two degrees warming, but it doesn't change the overall
picture," Caldeira said Wednesday at the American Geophysical Union
annual meeting.
Many of the efforts to "green" our world's infrastructure have
focused on the importance of changing the world's transportation systems.
Indeed, one of the images of environmental destruction is the car-choked
freeways of Los Angeles — and hybrid vehicles like the Toyota Prius have
become a badge of environmental pride.
But as the latest projections show, when it comes to global warming, oil
is a bit player on a stage dominated by the massive amounts of coal
burning, particularly in the United States and China. (Wired)
The correct answer is: "Neither". Atmospheric carbon
dioxide is both asset and essential resource -- we must have it
and more is actually really good.
More virtual world twaddle: World
Coal Reserves Could Be a Fraction of Previous Estimates - SAN
FRANCISCO — A new calculation of the world's coal reserves is much lower
than previous estimates. If validated, the new info could have a massive
impact on the fate of the planet's climate.
That's because coal is responsible for most of the CO2 emissions that
drive climate change. If there were actually less coal available for
burning, climate modelers would have to rethink their estimates of the
level of emissions that humans will produce.
The new model, created by Dave Rutledge, chair of Caltech's engineering
and applied sciences division, suggests that humans will only pull up a
total — including all past mining — of 662 billion tons of coal out of
the Earth. The best previous estimate, from the World Energy Council, says
that the world has almost 850 billion tons of coal still left to be mined.
"Every estimate of the ultimate coal resource has been larger,"
said ecologist Ken Caldeira of Stanford University, who was not involved
with the new study. "But if there's much less coal than we think,
that's good news for climate." (Wired)
Nonsense, it would merely be very bad news for people. Fortunately we
have no reason to have the slightest faith in peak-coalers either :)
Solar Stocks In
For Another Stormy Year In '09 - LOS ANGELES - As dismal as 2008 has
been for solar stocks, next year doesn't look any brighter.
Funding for solar projects and factory expansions remains scarce, prices
on panels are falling faster than expected as supplies jump, and a
dramatic drop in oil prices has tempered investor appetite for renewable
energy stocks. (Reuters)
UCLA
researchers make major advance in creating higher-density biofuels -
Genetic modification of bacterium results in alcohols with greater energy
Researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied
Science have successfully pushed nature beyond its limits by genetically
modifying Escherichia coli, a bacterium often associated with food
poisoning, to produce unusually long-chain alcohols essential in the
creation of biofuels.
"Previously, we were able to synthesize long-chain alcohols
containing five carbon atoms," said James Liao, UCLA professor of
chemical and biomolecular engineering. "We stopped at five carbons at
the time because that was what could be naturally achieved. Alcohols were
never synthesized beyond five carbons. Now, we've figured out a way to
engineer proteins for a whole new pathway in E. coli to produce
longer-chain alcohols with up to eight carbon atoms."
The new protein and metabolic engineering method developed by Liao and his
research team is detailed in the Dec. 30 issue of Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences. The paper is currently available online.
(UCLA Newsroom)
Unhealthy
Lawsuits - A physicians' group has found that the practice of
defensive medicine wastes more than a billion dollars a year in
Massachusetts alone. Trial lawyers should be ashamed of what they've done
to health care.
Nine of 10 doctors practice defensive medicine — ordering unneeded
laboratory and diagnostic tests, referring patients to consultations they
don't need, performing procedures that aren't called for, sending patients
to hospitals without cause — to avoid being sued, not to benefit their
clientele.
Doctors are a favorite prey of trial lawyers, whose litigation against the
profession has forced malpractice insurance to unaffordable heights in
some cases, driven doctors out of their chosen vocation and sent medical
care costs far higher than they should be.
The trial bar has also effectively made it harder for seriously ill
patients to be properly diagnosed and treated as doctors clog facilities
with patients who are in need of neither. (IBD)
Late-night
festive meals won't make you fat - LONDON - Think twice about blaming
sweets for your out-of-control children this festive season, and those
added pounds might not be due to an ill-advised late-night meal. As for an
aspirin to cure a hangover? Forget it.
That's the advice of two researchers seeking to debunk some common medical
myths that crop up during the holidays but have little scientific backing,
they say.
"In the pursuit of scientific truth, even widely held medical beliefs
require examination or re-examination," Rachel Vreeman and Aaron
Carroll of the Indiana University School of Medicine wrote in the British
Medical Journal.
"The holiday season presents a further opportunity to probe medical
beliefs recounted during this time of year."
The pair combed through previous scientific studies and searched the Web
for evidence to support or refute common beliefs such as one tagging
poinsettia plants as toxic. Don't worry, they aren't.
Many parents think sugar from sweets, chocolates and other sources makes
children hyperactive but research shows this is not the case. Rather, the
link is most likely in the parents' minds, the researchers said.
"Regardless of what parents might believe, however, sugar is not to
blame for out-of-control little ones," the researchers wrote.
(Reuters)
From the 'here we go again' files: U.S.
school meals may be key to better child health - WASHINGTON - Many
American children are not eating enough fruit and vegetables and their
diet lacks key nutrients, according to a report released on Wednesday that
focuses on school food programs as a way to help prevent long-term health
problems. (Reuters)
Experts
say Oliver Twist didn't need any more - LONDON - Oliver Twist wouldn't
have needed any more gruel in real life, scientists said on Thursday.
The picture painted by Charles Dickens of starvation rations in an 1830s
workhouse north of London is wide of mark, according to an analysis of
menus and other historical evidence.
Dickens' eponymous hero famously asked for more of the "thin
gruel" doled out three times daily in the grim institution for the
poor where he grew up. (Reuters)
Hmm... New
wave of mad cow disease feared - Fears that the human version of mad
cow disease could cause further waves of infection have been heightened by
the first case in a person who is genetically distinct from previous
patients.
All the 167 cases and 164 deaths in Britain caused by new variant
Creutzfeld-Jakob disease (vCJD) have so far occurred in people with a
particular genetic profile carried by 42 per cent of the population.
However, a young man with a different genetic type has recently been
clinically diagnosed with the incurable brain condition, BBC’s Newsnight
programme reported last night.
Though the patient’s diagnosis has yet to be confirmed by biopsy, the
most certain method, his case offers the strongest evidence yet that at
least 90 per cent of the population is susceptible to infection with vCJD
through eating beef infected with rogue prion proteins.
This suggests that a second wave of between 50 and 350 further infections
might be expected, scientists said. (Mark Henderson, The Times)
... we still don't know whether consumption of anything is really
related to nvCJD but one thing is for sure: the absurd panic and wild
guesstimations of bazillions of 'expected' cases were total nonsense.
Stupid greenies: EU
Draws Closer To Finalizing New Pesticides Law - BRUSSELS - European
Parliament negotiators have struck a political deal with EU countries
about revising pesticide authorization rules that would reduce the number
of crop chemicals on the market, officials said on Thursday.
The changes, to be debated by the full parliament in January and again by
EU farm ministers after that, would replace a 1991 law and let groups of
countries with similar geography and climate decide whether farmers may
use specific products.
But politically, a broad consensus had now been reached that should smooth
the way for a final deal to be rubber stamped, probably in the first few
months of 2009, officials said.
"This agreement is a milestone for the environment, health and
consumer protection in Europe. The EU will set a global precedent by
phasing out highly toxic pesticides," German Green MEP Hiltrud Breyer,
who is steering the draft pesticides law through Parliament, said in a
statement. A list of EU-approved "active substances" will be
drawn up, with certain highly toxic chemicals to be banned unless their
effect can be shown to be negligible.(Reuters)
Never give up on this rubbish, do they? Experts
Urge Safety Probe Of Plastics Chemicals - WASHINGTON - U.S. regulators
should examine whether a controversial class of chemicals found in many
plastic products including children's toys can hurt people, a panel of
experts said on Thursday.
A panel of the independent National Research Council said the scientific
evidence justifies an Environmental Protection Agency assessment of the
health effects from cumulative exposure to chemicals known as phthalates.
Phthalates, which make plastic products soft and flexible, have been used
commercially for decades. They are different from another chemical,
bisphenol A, or BPA, found in plastic products including baby bottles that
has also come under health scrutiny. The Food and Drug Administration says
BPA is safe at current levels of exposure but plans more research.
(Reuters)
Funniest
video yet on government economic stimulus plans — from Fred Thompson!
- Remember the hilarious skit by the two British comedians on the
financial market investment jargon and scams? Now comes Fred Thompson,
former U.S. presidential candidate and star of Law and Order, with his own
even funnier take on the government-backed economic rescue efforts. It
starts slow, then builds to take down the economic nonsense that passes
for policy.
It's also at a humour level that's rare in America, which is dominated by
the cheap-shot one liners of The Daily Show — funny but not subtle.
Thompson nails a more British humour form that's more subtle but also more
effective. See it here. (Terence
Corcoran, Financial Post)
Three Gorges Dam
Tested As Water Rises - BEIJING - Rising water levels in China's giant
Three Gorges Dam have triggered dozens of landslides in recent months,
damaging houses, land and infrastructure worth millions of dollars, state
media said on Thursday.
In July, China finished evacuating residents from the last town to be
submerged by the massive 660-km (400-mile) long reservoir on the Yangtze
River, ending an exodus of some 1.4 million people that began four years
ago.
The 2,309-meter-long dam, the world's largest, aims to tame the river and
provide cheap, clean energy for the country's rapid development. (Reuters)
December 18, 2008
Right! Even if for the wrong reasons: No
quick or easy technological fix for climate change, researchers say - UCLA scientist sees many geoengineering
plans as 'preposterous'
Global warming, some have argued, can be reversed with a large-scale "geoengineering" fix, such as
having a giant blimp spray liquefied sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere or building tens of millions of chemical
filter systems in the atmosphere to filter out carbon dioxide.
But Richard Turco, a professor in the UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and a member and
founding director of UCLA's Institute of the Environment, sees no evidence that such technological alterations of
the climate system would be as quick or easy as their proponents claim and says many of them wouldn't work at all.
Turco will present his new research on geoengineering — conducted with colleague Fangqun Yu, a research
professor at the State University of New York–Albany's atmospheric sciences research center — today and
Thursday at the American Geophysical Union's annual meeting in San Francisco.
"We're talking about tinkering with the climate system that affects everybody on Earth," said Turco, an
atmospheric chemist with expertise in the microphysics of fine particles suspended in the atmosphere. "Some
of the ideas are extreme. There would certainly be winners and losers, but no one would know who until it's too
late. (University of California - Los Angeles)
As readers are aware we do not view the climate as broken and therefore seek no fixes to begin with.
Moreover, warmer and wetter would be excellent news for the biosphere, meaning the alleged 'risks' of gorebull
warming are actually benefits. Finally, carbon dioxide is an essential resource supporting the bulk of life on
Earth and which is near critical low levels historically -- more is actually good for photosynthetic plants and
hence everything they support (cute, large-eyed fur-bearing critters ... even ugly naked critters like us).
Let us be unequivocal:
- we do not want to cool the Earth
- we do not want to restrict the supply of the essential trace gas carbon dioxide
- unlocking and returning carbon previously lost to the biosphere is the best thing humans have done for life
on Earth (figures that it is an accidental byproduct of human activity but that does not make it any less of a
gift to life on Earth)
Really? 47%
Willing To Pay More for ‘Green’ Goods and Services - Forty-seven percent (47%) of U.S. voters say they are
willing to pay more for goods and services if it means a cleaner environment, even as President-elect Obama
promises to move ahead aggressively on both the economic and ecological fronts. (Rasmussen Reports)
Wouldn't count on it.
Letter: MEP: THE PARADIGM WHICH THE IPCC DARE NOT SPEAK THE NAME
Benny
Garth Paltridge, then a senior Australian CSIRO researcher, published in 1974 one of the very earliest papers
(following Ralph Lorenz in 1960) on what is the burgeoning technical field of Maximum Entropy Production (MEP).
The science of MEP, which now generates a substantial amount of mainstream literature every year, is resulting in
a thorough review of the science of Earth's climate and of Global Circulation Models (GCMs).
It is already becoming clear this spells the death knell for a high temperature sensitivity to a CO2 doubling.
For example: Kleidon et al. (2006) Maximum entropy production and the strength of boundary layer exchange in an
atmospheric general circulation model. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 33, L06706, doi:10.1029/2005GL025373,
2006 show that the climate sensitivity to a 10x increase in atmospheric CO2 is about 3.3 K. Noting the usual
log-linear relationship this is equivalent to a climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 of only about 1.0 K.
In this setup, entropy was produced by radiative transfer (absorption of solar and terrestrial radiation at the
surface and in the atmosphere), the turbulent transport of sensible heat in the vertical, and horizontal heat
transport by large-scale atmospheric circulation. Due to the exclusion of the water cycle (evapotranspiration,
latent heat transport), entropy production associated with the hydrologic cycle [Paulius and Held, 2002a, 2002b]
was not considered.
Inclusion of the water cycle would mean the sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 is very likely to be even
significantly less than 1 deg. C. I don't think I have to spell out to you what this implied for even the lower
limit to CO2 sensitivity vis-a-vis IPCC AR4 2007.
Yet nowhere in IPCC AR4 2007 will you find a single reference to the now 38 year long MEP-based literature record!
This despite a steady groundswell of papers and the publication of an excellent review text edited by Axel Kleidon
and Ralph Lorenz in 2005 (Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics and the production of Entropy. Life, Earth and Beyond.
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg).
As CO2 goes up and tends to increase troposphere temperature, MEP requires that meridional, latitudinal and
convective movement must increase. This in turn increases cloudiness (both convective and orographic) and hence
rainfall thereby increasing the net amount by which clouds reduce the radiative heating of the planet i.e.
presently the -13 - -21 W/m^2 which we know acts against the ~4 W/m^2 predicted for a doubling of CO2.
I would also note that biotic processes are also subject to MEP. Rising CO2 increases continental plant biomass
(already observed) and oceanic cyanobacterial primary productivity (earlier this year I posted the clear evidence
for that for the Southern Ocean from NOAA's own data on Jennifer Marohasy's blog) simply due to CO2 fertilization
which increases biogenic aerosol production rate which in turn increases both cloud nucleation rate and
cloud-based opacity/albedo.
This aspect is the as-yet almost forgotten biotic sibling of abiotic MEP.
Thanks to both abiotic and (soon) biotic MEP we can expect a cloudier, rainier planet rather than a hotter one.
Atmospheric CO2 may go where it will but I suspect in due course its rate of increase will eventually slow. The
same thing will happen to any oceanic pH decline as increased raininess increases continental weathering rates
which increases the export of total alkalinity, Fe and Si into the ocean (which in turn tends to CO2-absorbing
primary productivity, neutralize CO2-induced acidity and so on).
Given:
* the lack of the IPCC-predicted stratospheric heating;
* the observed reduction in tropical-polar temperature gradients (underestimated by GCMs);
* the known 30 year trends in continental potential evaporation (down), cloudiness, rainfall (both up), oceanic
wind speeds (up) etc; and
* the confounding 20 year surface temperature record just before and since the 1998 El Nino (up then down),
I think we can reasonably expect to see a majority of top level climate researchers in the next few years
cautiously promulgating a more moderate view of global climate CO2 sensitivity and a more optimistic view on
climate homeostasis and so-called ocean acidification. It is already happening at various reputable overseas
universities (e.g. MIT, several Max Planck Institutes, Uni. Hamburg etc) and even now is slowly creeping into
other institutions, including here in Australia.
Of course the monstrous egos, the chronically dogmatic, the hopelessly compromised, the committed members of the
AGW herd won't like it but, hey, that's entropy for you.
Regards
Steve
Dr Steve Short
Director
Ecoengineers Pty Ltd
www.ecoengineers.com (via CCNet)
U.N.: Oblivious to science -
"Yes, we can!" former Vice President Al Gore bellowed as the crowd went wild during his closing day
speech at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Poznan, Poland, Friday. But it was not
Barack Obama's meaningless campaign motto they were excited about; instead, it was the prospect of using the
U.N.'s global warming propaganda to spread American wealth.
In reality, the hit on the U.S. economy by the U.N.'s legally binding 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the planned 2009
Copenhagen treaty would drastically reduce America's ability to make wealth, much less to increase its foreign aid
and technology transfers, the essence of both treaties.
Most astonishing is that the global warming treaty is not based on sound science. The U.N. created its own
political entity, the International Panel on Climate Change, to produce its own global warming conclusions. The
U.N.'s IPCC conveniently ignores data and has made significant alterations to scientific documents after
scientists approved them in order to convey human influence on climate. (Cathie Adams, WND)
Greenies
go ga-ga over emissions - APOPLECTIC apocalyptic greenies threw shoes at an effigy of Kevin Rudd, broke into a
woodchip mill in Tasmania and threatened to move to Europe as part of an orchestrated dummy spit against the Prime
Minister's emissions scheme announced this week.
The tantrums from Australia's screeching environmental banshees have barely abated since the Government revealed
its plan to cut Australia's greenhouse gas emissions from between 5 and 15 per cent by 2020, an amount deemed too
small by green groups.
"It's a decision to see the Great Barrier Reef die before our very eyes," said Greens Senator Christine
Milne.
Rudd must be rubbing his hands with glee as the more crazed greenies give him the appearance of being a safe pair
of hands on climate change - doing just enough to placate green-aware citizens but not enough to wreck the
economy.
But his scheme is a more radical proposal than any other country has adopted.
Professor Bob Carter, a James Cook University geologist, described it yesterday as "the worst single piece of
legislation to be tabled in the Parliament since Federation".
"It is a non-solution to a non-problem," he said. "If ever there were a bill that justifies a
conscience vote, then this must be it, for it wittingly intends to reduce the living standards of all
Australians."
The Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, who is about to take up the EU presidency, described the European climate deal
as "a silly luxury" this week, so what does that make Australia's deal? (Miranda Devine, Sydney Morning
Herald)
EU Court Rejects Steel's Challenge To Carbon Market - LUXEMBOURG -
The European Union's carbon emissions trading scheme, Europe's key tool for fighting climate change, does not
discriminate against steelmakers, the EU's top court said on Tuesday.
"The directive establishing a community scheme for greenhouse gas allowance trading does not breach the
principle of equal treatment," the European Court of Justice (ECJ) said after a key test of the emissions
trading scheme (ETS).
The ruling came just days after European leaders agreed a package of measures to cut emissions to 20 percent below
1990 levels by 2020, after easing the rules slightly to help industry in the grip of recession. (Reuters)
EU finalises deal to fight climate
change - BRUSSELS/STRASBOURG, Dec 17 - The European Union finalised plans for its battle against global
warming on Wednesday, seeking to lead the way towards a broad alliance including other big polluters like China
and the United States.
The European Parliament approved a cut in carbon dioxide emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020,
heeding warnings of severe weather, famine and drought as the atmosphere heats up.
The deal takes on a greater importance coming just before Barack Obama assumes the U.S. presidency, amid hopes in
Europe he will cooperate more on tackling climate change than incumbent George W. Bush.
"Happily Bush is going," said European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas. "Everybody knows
what Mr Obama has set as priorities -- energy security and climate change." (Reuters)
'From EU, 4 Percent Less Reduction Till 2020' -
BRUSSELS, Dec 17 - Greenhouse gas emissions from the European Union may fall by as little as four percent between
now and 2020 as a result of a new decision by the bloc's law-makers.
In a Dec. 17 vote, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) approved the broad thrust of a package of measures to
address climate change agreed by the EU's governments last week.
Officially, this commits the Union's 27 countries to reducing its emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other
gases that trigger climate change by 20 percent below 1990 levels by the end of the next decade. As part of an
objective known as the 'triple 20 percent', the EU has also pledged to boost energy efficiency by 20 percent and
to ensure that 20 percent of its energy derives from renewable sources.
Yet the small print of the Parliament's decision allows the bulk of CO2 reductions to be 'off-set' by financing
'clean development' projects outside the EU's borders. An integral part of the package known as the
'effort-sharing law' is especially reliant on offsetting.
The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) has calculated that the actual emission cuts achieved within the Union could
be only four or five percent by 2020. Its estimate is based on data from the bloc's own environment agency
estimating that an 8 percent cut took place in the Union between 1990 and 2006. Of the remaining 12 percent cut
required to attain the 20 percent objective, most could be undertaken abroad.
"The 20 percent target sounds nice in words," said WWF spokeswoman Delia Villagrasa. "But it is
void because EU countries are allowed to accomplish approximately three-quarters of the effort outside EU
borders."
WWF argued that the deal is not sufficient to comply with the Union's stated objective of preventing global
temperatures from rising more than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. If the EU's example is
replicated throughout the world, Greenland's ice sheet will melt in its entirety and the future of many cities
will be jeopardised by rising sea levels.
Greenpeace climate change specialist Joris den Blanken concurred. "The effort-sharing law allows so much
offsetting outside the EU that I don't think it even qualifies as EU legislation any more," he said. (IPS)
<chuckle> Did Early Global
Warming Divert A New Glacial Age? — The common wisdom is that the invention of the steam engine and the
advent of the coal-fueled industrial age marked the beginning of human influence on global climate.
But gathering physical evidence, backed by powerful simulations on the world's most advanced computer climate
models, is reshaping that view and lending strong support to the radical idea that human-induced climate change
began not 200 years ago, but thousands of years ago with the onset of large-scale agriculture in Asia and
extensive deforestation in Europe.
What's more, according to the same computer simulations, the cumulative effect of thousands of years of human
influence on climate is preventing the world from entering a new glacial age, altering a clockwork rhythm of
periodic cooling of the planet that extends back more than a million years. (ScienceDaily)
NOAA
and NASA Estimate 2008 will be 9th Warmest for the Globe - Don’t Buy It - Though it doesn’t rank with the
Bernie Madhoff’s Ponzi scheme, it is nonetheless criminal at a time when important decisions are about to be
made that will affect our way of living and economic well-being.
According to a NOAA Press Release yesterday, NCDC’s ranking of 2008 as ninth warmest if expected trends continue
compares to a similar ranking of ninth warmest based on an analysis by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space
Studies. The NASA analysis indicates that the January-November global temperature was 0.76 degree F (0.42 degree
C) above the 20th century mean. The NOAA and NASA analyses differ slightly in methodology, but both use data from
NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center - the federal government’s official source for climate data.
Don’t believe a word of it. UAH MSU satellite data suggest 2008 will end up about the 15th warmest (16th
coldest) in their 30 years of lower tropospheric data. The NASA, NOAA and Hadley data bases are seriously
contaminated and the agencies are intentionally ignoring the issues as they are agenda driven with inflated
budgets because of the alleged global warming. (Joseph D’Aleo, CCM, AMS Fellow)
Impacts
Of Urbanization And Land Surface Changes On Climate Trends By Kalnay Et Al - There is an excellent new paper
by an outstanding research group titled “Impacts of urbanization and land surface changes on climate trends”
by Eugenia Kalnay, Ming Cai, Mario Nunez and Young-Kwon Lim that appeared in the March issue of the journal of the
International Association for Urban Climate. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Still trying to kill an inconvenient alternate hypothesis: Cosmic
Rays Do Not Explain Global Warming, Study Finds — A new study supports earlier findings by stating that
changes in cosmic rays most likely do not contribute to climate change. It is sometimes claimed that changes in
radiation from space, so-called galactic cosmic rays, can be one of the causes of global warming. A new study,
investigating the effect of cosmic rays on clouds, concludes that the likelihood of this is very small. (ScienceDaily)
And yet the effect can be demonstrated
experimentally.
Recent
Temperature Trends in Context - As 2008 nears an end, there are a lot of folks waiting to see where the final
number is going to come in for this year’s global average temperature. It’s likely that the average
temperature for 2008 will fall below the value for 2007 and quite possibly be the coldest year of the (official)
21st century. 2008 will add another to the growing recent string of years during which time global average
temperatures have not risen. Does this mean that pressure of “global warming” fuelled by increasing greenhouse
gas emissions from human activity has abated?
The answer is a qualified “no”—it seems that natural variations have been flexing their muscles and
offsetting anthropogenic warming. (WCR)
Qualitative Thoughts on CO2 -
Recently I commented on CO2 concentration as a function of temperature. This paper is my attempt to answer
comments and reactions for which I am grateful. I wrote: It appears that CO2 concentrations follows temperature
with approx 6-9 months. The interesting part is off course that the CO2 trends so markedly responds to temperature
changes.
To some, this is "not possible" as we normally see a very smooth rise on CO2 curves. However, the
difference in CO2 rise from year to year is quite different from warm to cold years, and as shown differences are
closely dependent on global temperatures. (Frank Lansner, Icecap)
U.S. Carbon Output Slower Than Thought By 2030 - NEW YORK - U.S.
energy-related emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide by 2030 will be 9.4 percent less than forecast last
year as renewable energy develops and prices cut demand, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday.
Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions will hit 6.410 billion metric tons in 2030, the EIA said in its Annual
Energy Outlook 2009. In its 2008 outlook, the EIA had forecast the emissions to hit 6.851 billion metric tons by
2030.
"Efficiency policies and higher energy prices ... slow the rise in U.S. energy use," the EIA said.
"When combined with the increased use of renewables and a reduction in the projected additions of new
coal-fired conventional power plants, this slows the growth in energy-related (greenhouse gas) emissions."
(Reuters)
Desperate talk: 2009 'year of
climate change': UN chief - UNITED NATIONS - UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday called 2009 "the year of
climate change" as he reviewed the world body's "mixed" record handling crises in Darfur, Kosovo
and Zimbabwe.
Speaking at his last official press conference at UN headquarters this year, the secretary general listed climate
change, one of his priorities since he assumed his post two years ago, as a key challenge for the world next year.
"I am pleased with our success in keeping climate change high on the global agenda," he said, adding
that "2009 will be the year of climate change."
"We have no time to waste. We must reach a global climate change deal before the end of the year (2009) - one
that is balanced, comprehensive and ratifiable by all nations," Ban said. (AFP)
Nonsense: UN
official points to climate change among issues to steer long-term business growth – The global crisis in
financial markets and looming economic recession has focused the corporate world’s attention on critical
non-financial issues – such as climate change – important to its future survival, the head of the United
Nations initiative for ethical business told reporters today. (UN News)
Ha! Why coming clean is good
business - Public firms grapple with climate-change disclosure
Public companies can't allow preoccupation with the financial crisis to detract from the importance of focusing on
climate-change disclosure, securities lawyers say. Statistics indicate that U. S. companies mentioned climate
change 7,634 times in their securities filings in the first quarter of 2008 compared with 536 in the comparable
period in 2006. (Financial Post)
Yeah, that did 'em a lot of good, eh? Perhaps if they were not distracted by such fantasy threats they might
actually deal with the business of business!
Northeast CO2 Output Drops On Fuel Switch, Demand - NEW YORK -
Carbon dioxide emissions from power generators in 10 US Northeastern states are on track to fall steeply in 2008
on softer prices for cleaner-burning natural gas and lighter electricity demand, according to a report released
Monday.
The report was issued by Environment Northeast, a research and advocacy group that helped the 10 states from
Maryland to Massachusetts form the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a pact aiming to force utilities to
cut emissions of the planet-warming gas by placing a cap on their pollution starting in January.
Carbon dioxide output this year from the 10 states is on track to be 16 percent below the group's cap of 188
million tons of emissions, according to the report. Environment Northeast reported in September that 2007
emissions were about 9 percent below the cap. (Reuters)
Algeria's Experiment in Carbon
Capture - A venture by Algeria's Sonatrach, the United Kingdom's BP, and Norway's Statoil to strip CO2 out of
natural gas and store it underground could help cut emissions.
About 700 miles south of Algiers, the capital of Algeria, a monumental assemblage of pipes and cylinders rises
from the bleak Sahara Desert. Not far away is a small airstrip and helicopter pad. And in a compound down the
road, surrounded by a thick stand of trees to break the whistling winds, there are dormitories, tennis courts,
even a mess hall, where a crew of chefs whips up hearty meals including lobster pie and potato tarts for several
hundred people.
In a way, this oil industry camp represents an effort to turn the desert -- or at least the natural gas Algeria
exports to Europe -- green. The plant, which is situated on a tiny oasis known as Krechba, is designed to strip
out and cleanly dispose of the carbon dioxide contained in the gas produced by a vast network of seven distinct
fields below the desert floor.
The gas in this part of gas-rich Algeria contains about 7 percent CO2, on average. That contaminant level must be
reduced to about 0.3 percent before it is exported to Italy and other European countries. In the past, energy
companies vented such unwanted CO2 into the atmosphere, adding to the greenhouse gas problem. But in this case,
the partners, Sonatrach, the national oil and gas company, BP, and, Norway's Statoil decided in the late 1990s to
store the carbon dioxide underground. (Der Spiegel)
Yes, they do need to reduce the CO2 content of natural gas but the reinjection of same is to
maintain field pressure, not control planetary temperature.
Overcompensation blunts
ETS's value - LIKE most political compromises, the Rudd Government's policy on climate change is inadequate
and its own white paper explains why.
The justification for substantially increasing its initial offer to shield industries exposed to international
trade is the risk of carbon leakage: that is, companies moving overseas and merrily causing pollution in a country
that does not limit emissions. Certainly, there have been plenty of dark threats to that effect from local company
executives.
But the white paper released on Monday points out that deciding on the location of a business involves many
factors, such as access to resources, skilled labour and infrastructure, security of energy supply and political
stability. "As such, the absence of a carbon constraint ... will not automatically lead to carbon leakage
from Australia; indeed, Treasury modelling suggests this risk is low and work by the (International Energy Agency)
suggests there has been little carbon leakage from Europe since the introduction of the (European Union's
emissions trading scheme)," it adds.
So why give heavy emitters an estimated 45 per cent of all permits by 2020, rather than the 30 per cent originally
judged as adequate? Because the Government was not prepared to call their bluff. (The Australian)
Who says carbon dioxide emissions trading has any value whatsoever?
So, windfarms really do significantly dry and heat their surrounds: Answers
to huge wind-farm problems are blowin' in the wind - While harnessing more energy from the wind could help
satisfy growing demands for electricity and reduce emissions of global-warming gases, turbulence from proposed
wind farms could adversely affect the growth of crops in the surrounding countryside.
Solutions to this, and other problems presented by wind farms - containing huge wind turbines, each standing
taller than a 60-story building and having blades more than 300 feet long - can be found blowin' in the wind, a
University of Illinois researcher says. (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Palm
oil no longer sustainable for Malaysians, unless they burn it! - KUALA LUMPUR ~ Malaysian power producers will
soon start burning palm oil instead of coal following the collapse of palm oil prices on the international market.
Under a plan announced last week by the country’s Plantation Industries and Commodities minister Peter Chin, the
Malaysian government also aims to ensure that palm biodiesel is available at every gas station throughout the
country by 2010.
logged forest in asiaProducers are reeling under the shock of plummeting prices that have seen palm oil crash from
a high of US$1,267 to today’s low of around $450 per ton, leaving them with a massive pool.
The plan was welcomed by an environmentalist group today on the grounds that it will severely dent palm-oil
profits and may lead the Malaysians to introduce a moratorium on new plantations, albeit for the wrong reasons.
(Green Assembly)
UK Biodiesel Plant Crippled By U.S. Subsidies - LONDON - Britain's
largest biodiesel plant is running well below capacity, crippled by U.S. subsidies, Biofuels Corporation Trading
Limited Chairman Sean Sutcliffe said in an interview on Wednesday.
The European Union said earlier this year it was investigating whether soaring imports of U.S. biodiesel break
global trade rules because of subsidies.
"Damage has been done across the industry, plants have shut down. The European market is being served by
imports because of this unfair subsidy," Sutcliffe said. (Reuters)
Dying without
insurance — a myth or fact? - A worrying claim that has circulated for years is that 18,000 Americans die
every year because they don’t have health insurance. A thought-provoking analysis revealed that this is little
more than an urban legend. (Junkfood Science)
Innocent
children and the most vulnerable can be hurt the most - A heartbreaking story was reported in the Australian
news today about a young girl left crippled and brain damaged. Her father had come to feel so afraid and
distrustful of modern medicine that he continued to give her alternative remedies for a heart infection and
delayed taking her to the hospital until it was too late. (Junkfood Science)
Lancet: Dozens of
nations inflated vaccine numbers - LONDON – Dozens of developing countries exaggerated figures on how many
children were vaccinated against deadly diseases, which allowed them to get more money from U.N.-sponsored
programs, a new study said Friday.
Research in the medical journal, The Lancet, said only half as many children were vaccinated than was claimed by
countries taking part in special programs meant to reach kids in poor nations. The findings raise serious issues
about vaccination programs — and whether money earmarked for children is actually reaching their intended
recipients.
"With the unprecedented billions given by the international community, there is no excuse for these poor
coverage rates," said Philip Stevens, of the International Policy Network, a London-based think-tank.
"One has to wonder where the money has gone — hopefully not into Swiss bank accounts." (Associated
Press)
More dodgy UN
figures - According to a major new Gates-funded study in The Lancet, developing countries have been hugely
over-reporting their coverage rates for childhood vaccinations.
The Associated Press takes up the story: "From 1986 to 2006, the United Nations reported that 14 million
children received immunizations in the programs. But the reports from the independent surveys put that number at
just over 7 million."
All this is depressingly reminiscent of UNAIDS' systematic overreporting of global AIDS prevalence.
There are two points to take away from this. (Campaign For Fighting Diseases)
New
definition of fake drugs envisages better health - But India is resisting amendments to the definition, citing
bogus fears of 'protectionism' and baseless 'threat' to its generics industry
A decision is expected by this year's end on a new global definition of counterfeit medicines, aimed at saving
people from harm and even death. But activists and the Indian Health Ministry are resisting the move, claiming it
comes from vested interests and threatens the nation's vast generics industry.
The definition proposed by the World Health Organisation's International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting
Taskforce (IMPACT) is enthusiastically supported by countries where people suffer terribly from counterfeit drugs,
such as Gambia, Ghana and Nigeria. WHO estimates that up to 20 per cent of drugs sold in India may be counterfeit.
Although the Centre denies this, fake and sub-standard drugs from India certainly plague many other parts of the
world. This year a study in six African cities showed over a third of anti-malarial drugs to be sub-standard. Of
the drugs from Asia (principally India and China), 32 per cent were sub-standard.
These rip-offs provoke suffering, death and drug-resistant strands of disease and they damage the reputation of
good Indian generic drugs. (Julian Harris, The Pioneer)
California... California
officials launch 'Green Chemistry' initiative - The plan would inform consumers how items sold in the state
are manufactured and transported and how environmentally safe their ingredients are.
Is that laundry soap truly "environmentally friendly"? Was that mattress treated with toxic chemicals?
Is that sweatsuit fashioned from organic cotton? Is that lipstick "natural"?
California officials launched a sweeping green initiative on Tuesday to inform consumers exactly how hundreds of
thousands of products sold in the state are manufactured and transported and how safe their ingredients are.
The plan, which would require every product to reveal its "environmental footprint," envisions the most
comprehensive regulations ever adopted for consumer goods. (LA Times)
Bulgaria Delays Plastic Bags Tax Due To Crisis - SOFIA - Bulgaria
delayed on Tuesday plans to levy a tax on plastic shopping bags, aimed at reducing plastic waste, on fears that
the tax would burden businesses too much during the global financial crisis. (Reuters)
Time to give up on saving the
planet? - Doom and gloom climate change reports, gathering pessimism and a sense that time is running out - is
it okay to admit that you feel like giving up on saving the planet? (Bibi van der Zee, The Guardian)
Yes Bibi, by all means give up. The world will definitely be better off without you and your hysterical ilk.
'The end' as a weapon - Some
environmentalists have their own fixation with the apocalypse — just not the biblical one. This involves the
wrath of nature and the ecological end times. But fear is an ineffective tool for any cause. (Tom Krattenmaker,
USA TODAY)
More Evidence
of Intimidation in the Green Movement - Mark Lynas is best known for shoving a pie in Bjorn Lomborg's face. So
when he says people in the environmental movement are closed-minded and resort to intimidation, it's worth paying
attention to what he says. He's come to the realization that nuclear power doesn't deserve its reputation and is a
valuable tool against global warming, which has earned him scorn from his peers. (Iain Murray, Planet Gore)
Report says biotechnology can tackle
global warming - The Bureau of Rural Sciences says biotechnology can help Australian farmers remain viable
despite the effects of climate change.
The bureau's latest report says biotechnologies like genetic modification can help develop new crops and pasture
species tolerate the forecast hotter and drier conditions, use nitrogen more effectively, and resist pests and
diseases.
It also says biotechnology will help reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, by allowing farmers to cut
their fuel and fertiliser use. (Australian Broadcasting Corp.)
Of all the reasons to use biotech gorebull warming ain't it!
December 17, 2008
Follow Up On UK Met
Office Long-Term Forecasts - On December 11, 2008, Climate Science posted a weblog titled “Comments On UK
Met Office Press Releases On Climate. Thanks to Steve Goddard, he has alerted us to a news article which provides
further support for the difficulty of long term weather prediction.
The Daily Telegraph published an article on December 13 2008 titled “Weather:Coldest start to winter since 1976
- Britain has endured its coldest start to winter in more than 30 years” by Stephen Adams. While warmer weather
is predicted in the coming weeks by the ECMWF model (see), this very cold period certainly was not predicted by
the UK Met Office. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Blast from the past: Warm,
Watered and Well Fed is Better - The Carbon Sense Coalition today claimed that all government efforts to stop
global warming and cut carbon dioxide emissions were anti-life and against the interests of mankind. (Carbon Sense
Coalition)
Global Warming’s Last
Gasp - You folks in Fargo, N.D., who think you are shivering because it's 11 degrees below zero are badly
mistaken — according to the precious computer models global warming alarmists use, it can't be that bitterly
cold.
Their models show conclusively that the world is heating up. How can it be minus 11 degrees in Fargo? The models
never showed it would get cooler.
Well it is, but they prefer to ignore such facts that might poke a large hole in their pet global warming theory
that keeps their bank accounts fat and healthy with the grants that fund their researching of a scientific scam.
In the midst of an early winter vicious cold front that has plunged large areas of the northern United States into
sub-zero temperatures, an Associated Press journalist has penned an absurd report warning that the world is in the
process of being spit roasted by the alleged warming of the planet. (Philip V. Brennan, NewsMax)
Interesting... Phoenix probe
sheds new light on Mars weather - CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida - NASA is still unable to say for sure whether its
Phoenix lander has found a place where life could have existed on Mars.
But scientists working with the U.S. space agency said on Monday computer models they have been using to predict
what the weather would be like on the Red Planet are wrong, and more accurate models would give a better picture
of its past. (Reuters)
Mars would appear rather easier to model than Earth and yet they can't get Mars climate models right. Tell us
again how good the Earth ones are...
<Muffled laughter> Sea
level could rise by 150cm, US scientists warn - Sea level rise due to global warming will "substantially
exceed" official UN projections and could top 150cm by the end of the century, according to a report from the
US Geological Survey on the risks of abrupt climate change. Such a rise would be catastrophic, seeing hundreds of
millions of people affected by flooding.
Many scientists now fear the warming world is on the verge of "tipping points", in which climate change
and its effects accelerate rapidly. The science is evolving quickly and the new report updates the most recent
findings of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which was released in 2007.
Some observers have called for an update of the science before the UN talks on a global deal on greenhouse gases
emissions reach their finale in December 2009. The US report considers four scenarios for abrupt change, and
delivers bad news on two.
On sea level, the report found models used by the IPCC in 2007 do not take into account recent information on how
fast glaciers slide into the oceans, particularly from Greenland and the West Antarctic ice sheets. The report
says the south western states of the US will enter a "permanent drought state". (The Guardian)
Sheesh! Change,
but at what price? - After 2008 started with panic over food prices, the world seemed to be waking up to
global warming. But then the recession hit
No one could have predicted quite how dramatically 2008 would have ended. Even as President Bush was slashing his
way through US environmental protection laws, president-elect Obama appointed Nobel prize-winning physicist Steve
Chu as the next US energy secretary. Chu is seen as the repudiation of everything that Bush stood for, and
predicts temperatures will rise by a staggering 6.1C by the end of the century if nothing is done. Although it
does not mean the oil age is over, if you want a sign that 2008 was a tipping point, it could not have been
clearer. (John Vidal, The Guardian)
No Rush to New Kyoto? - “We’ve always been at
war with Eastasia, Winston”
It is only fitting that amid the talks over a successor to the 2008-2012 Kyoto “global warming” treaty in
Poznan, Poland -- where the Poles were lectured how they should leave that abundant coal in the ground since their
friendly Russian neighbors have a reliable gas supply for them to burn instead -- that we should see eye-popping
rhetorical revisions to join such ignorance of history. (Christopher C. Horner, Human Events)
Cooling on Global Warming - Germany and
the rest of Europe are getting more rational on climate change.
Participants at last week's United Nations climate conference in Poznan, Poland, were taken aback by a world
seemingly turned upside-down. The traditional villains and heroes of the international climate narrative, the
wicked U.S. and the noble European Union, had unexpectedly swapped roles. For once, it was the EU that was
criticized for backpedalling on its CO2 targets while Europe's climate nemesis, the U.S., found itself commended
for electing an environmental champion as president. (Benny Peiser, Wall Street Journal Europe)
Europe’s
Climate Policy For Dummies = 4% by 2020 - Those interested in the full details of the European climate
agreement reached last week in Brussels can examine it in all of its gory details here (in PDF). It is, to put it
mildly, complicated. So in the interests of those just wanting the bottom line, here I offer a simplified version
of the policy. (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Carbon Markets - What's In It for the Poor? -
UXBRIDGE, Canada, Dec 15 - Climate experts meeting in Poznan, Poland, promised to create a new pot of
carbon-credit gold for the rural poor as guardians of rural lands and forests.
But there are many who warn that the gold will flow only to corporate interests. (Tierramérica)
Bull! The
greenhouse gas emissions race is on - BUSINESS must act swiftly to measure and report on greenhouse gas
emissions after the release of the Government's white paper. (The Australian)
If there was the slightest doubt before All-talk Kevin has dispelled it now -- Australia is not
seriously going to pursue any self-destructive "anti gorebull warming" strategies.
Industry revolt on green plan
as miners sacked - HEAVY industry is demanding further concessions in the Rudd Government's modest emissions
trading scheme, saying it will still cost jobs, stymie investment and exacerbate the effects of the economic
downturn.
Conservationists have panned the scheme for pandering to "dirty" industry, saying it will not help the
environment and offers overly generous compensation that transfers $2.24 billion from taxpayers to major polluters
in 2010, potentially rising to $12.25billion in 2020.
But industries such as cement, aluminium and coalmining say that although the Government increased compensation
and announced modest emission reduction targets in the scheme unveiled on Monday, they would lobby for further
concessions, either in draft legislation to be released early next year or through Coalition-supported amendments
in the Senate. (The Australian)
Blessed change in the
climate - EVERY now and then you have to be grateful when you discover our political leaders have told a
deliberate, calculated lie. Monday was such a day. Kevin Rudd's announcement of a carbon emissions reduction
target of 5 per cent by 2020 demonstrated that his pre-election claim that climate change was the great moral
issue of our time, and demanding that Australia lead the way, was what Winston Churchill would call a
terminological inexactitude: a whopper, a piece of bare-faced duplicity of epic proportions. But thank goodness
Rudd and his colleagues deceived us.
And deceive us they did. At the election last year, Rudd said Australian wanted real action on climate change. And
Rudd acted, in a real symbolic kind of way. He ratified the Kyoto Protocol. More symbolism when he promised to cut
emissions by 60 per cent on 2000 levels by 2050, 41 years away.
While most of the media has failed to take Rudd to task, the truth is that if the Rudd Government genuinely
believed climate change to be the greatest moral threat facing humanity, and if it fully accepted the findings of
the UN panel that laid down a minimum target cut of 25 per cent to 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 to
prevent catastrophic climate change, then we now would have bigger cuts. A true believer in those claims could do
no less.
To a true believer, policy responses to a temporary global financial crisis could not compete with the sort of
policies required to stem permanent, irrevocable damage caused by climate change.
But, thank God, Rudd and his ministers are not in fact true believers. Rudd's higher carbon reduction target of 15
per cent is predicated on other key economies committing to target reductions comparable to Australia. In other
words, Australia follows, rather than leads. Rudd's caution on targets is unquestionably driven by, dare one use
the word, scepticism about the world's ability to reach consensus on tackling climate change. In other words, Rudd
sounds more and more like John Howard every day.
The alternative - that Australia lead the climate change parade rather than sitting comfortably in middle of the
pack - is the kind of moral narcissism only the Greens and like-minded eco-fundamentalists can afford. (Janet
Albrechtsen, The Australian)
The Fabian Carbon Tax - Everyone is
relieved that we are only getting a 5% carbon tax penalty with lots of refunds, exemptions and electoral bribes.
This is the worst possible outcome.
Better they stayed at 25% tax, which would have provoked such a revolt that even the Liberals would have objected.
The whole thing would then have been abandoned at the first opportunity.
But this sneaky Fabian tax will get onto the books and we will all be trained to submit annual returns to the
Greenhouse office. Then later, exemptions will be abandoned, the tax will become a permanent feature of the mess
called the Australian Tax “System”, and 5% will creep to 10%, to 20%, where they wanted it in the first place.
Meanwhile, climate change will continue regardless.
And those looking forward to their Green subsidies and handouts need to remember:
“The benefit you get from Canberra is the tax you sent to Canberra, less bureaucratic charges both ways”. (Viv
Forbes, Carbon Sense Coalition)
Climate change: 2008 is
world's 10th hottest year - THE year 2008 is set to be the 10th warmest on record for the globe, with a
temperature 0.31°C above average.
And Australia is on track for its 15th warmest year on record, with a temperature 0.37°C above average, according
to the World Meteorological Organisation.
Senior Climatologist with the Bureau of Meteorology, Andrew Watkins, said 2008 was a La Nina year, in which the
Pacific Ocean cools and temperatures tend to be lower across Australia.
"In spite of that La Nina event we still came out with the 15th warmest on record year for Australia,"
he said.
Dr Watkins pointed out the preliminary global figure means 2008 was "warmer than all but two years in the
previous century, so we are still seeing considerable warming here post-2000." (The Australian)
We've covered this particular deception before. Yes, the average of the last decade, where temperatures have
actually declined, is higher than the average of the previous decade, where temperatures increased more
rapidly than the last has cooled. That's how genuine cooling becomes a pretend warming.
Hmm... Arctic Ice Volume Lowest Ever as Globe
Warms: UN - GENEVA - Ice volume around the Arctic region hit the lowest level ever recorded this year as
climate extremes brought death and devastation to many parts of the world, the U.N. weather agency WMO said on
Tuesday.
Although the world's average temperature in 2008 was, at 14.3 degrees Celsius (57.7 degrees Fahrenheit), by a
fraction of a degree the coolest so far this century, the direction toward a warmer climate remained steady, it
reported.
"What is happening in the Arctic is one of the key indicators of global warming," Michel Jarraud,
Secretary General of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), said. "The overall trend is still
upwards." (Reuters)
... enthusiastic claims, if dubious.
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
Young Forest Stands Exposed to Elevated CO2
and Ozone: The Importance of Long-Term Studies: Are root biomass responses after seven to ten years of
elevated CO2 and ozone exposure the same as those observed in the first five years of growth
in these conditions?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data published by 647
individual scientists from 378
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm Period Record of the Week comes from Taravilla
Lake, Central Iberian Range, Spain. To access the entire Medieval Warm Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Agriculture (Species - Alfalfa):
How is the alfalfa plant affected by increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO2?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses to atmospheric CO2
enrichment obtained from experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: European
Beech and Norway Spruce Ecosystem, Garden
Bean, Sour Orange Tree, and Sweet
Orange Tree.
Journal Reviews:
Estimating 21st-Century Sea Level Rise: How do James
Hansen's wild ideas stack up against more rational analyses?
Last Glacial Maximum and Little Ice Age Atmospheric
Circulation Characteristics Over the Mediterranean Sea: How similar or different were they?
The Little Ice Age in the Tropical Andes of Bolivia:
How similar was it to the Little Ice Age in Europe? ... and why is the answer important?
Less Frequent but More Extreme Rainfall Events in
Semi-Arid Grasslands: Is the global-warming-induced precipitation change good or bad for plant productivity?
Global Warming and Wildfires: Have rising
temperatures been promoting the occurrence of larger and more frequent wildfires around the world?
CO2 Truth-Alerts
Click here to watch short videos on
various global warming topics. Embed any Truth Alert video on your own web page or to watch it on YouTube in a
higher resolution. (co2science.org)
Sun Often 'Tears Out A Wall' In Earth's Solar Storm Shield
-- Earth's magnetic field, which shields our planet from particles streaming outward from the Sun, often develops
two holes that allow the largest leaks, according to researchers sponsored by NASA and the National Science
Foundation.
"The discovery overturns a long-standing belief about how and when most of the solar particles penetrate
Earth's magnetic field, and could be used to predict when solar storms will be severe. Based on these results, we
expect more severe storms during the upcoming solar cycle," said Vassilis Angelopoulos of the University of
California, Los Angeles, Principal Investigator for NASA's THEMIS mission (Time History of Events and Macroscale
Interactions during Substorms). THEMIS was used to discover the size of the leak. (PhysOrg.com)
OPEC Was Right About Oil Prices. Now What? -
Back in June, I wrote a piece for The American in which I argued that oil prices were being driven higher by the
immutable law of supply and demand. Today, with prices plunging to near $40 instead of the $145 level seen in
mid-July, it’s abundantly obvious that speculators were a key driver, probably the main driver, of the surge in
oil prices that occurred between late 2007 and July.
So, to be clear, I was wrong. The leaders of OPEC were right. So, too, was my pal, Ed Wallace. In May, Wallace, a
savvy journalist from Fort Worth who writes for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram and Business Week, published several
articles which he showed how the unregulated futures market was being used by speculators to push prices upward.
(Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
Drill, Arnold, Drill! -
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is begging for a bailout to close an $11 billion budget gap. He should be
pressing for an oil revenue-sharing deal instead.
California's revenues have weakened more than expected, thanks to a protracted housing slump and sinking retail
sales. Rising unemployment is also adding to budget woes.
Schwarzenegger wants to raise the state's sales tax to help make up the shortfall. But there's a better way to
drum up revenues, one that won't cost California taxpayers a dime. The state could generate huge royalties by
allowing offshore oil drilling.
"Can we maybe think about offshore royalties that businesses and oil companies would pay?" pleaded
California Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines.
Though a Republican, Schwarzenegger opposes new drilling off the California coast. And the Democrat-led Assembly
and state Senate recently passed resolutions urging Congress to preserve a federal ban on drilling in the Atlantic
and Pacific.
But public outcry over gas prices led Congress in October to lift the quarter-century ban, opening the door to
state drilling.
The Interior Department estimates that those bicoastal waters contain at least 18 billion barrels of oil — more
than half of it off the California coast.
Drilling in those waters could generate almost $1 trillion in new energy revenue, pumping potentially billions
into California and other state coffers in the form of royalties and other income. (IBD)
Bailing Out Wind - Obama
announces his energy team without mentioning a green source of renewable energy that could create jobs, reduce
carbon emissions and reinvigorate a vital manufacturing sector — nuclear power.
The domestic auto industry isn't the only uncompetitive industry that seems to require life-sustaining
transfusions of government cash to stay in business. Alternative energy sources have relied on such subsidies,
called "investments," for years.
Yet in President-elect Obama's announcement of his energy team, we were told "the foundations of our energy
independence" lie in "the power of wind and solar." Except that for these alternative sources
there's been a severe power shortage.
After decades of tax credits and subsidies, wind provides only about 1% of our electricity. By comparison, coal
provides 49%, natural gas 22%, nuclear power 19% and hydroelectric 7%.
Wind power is currently uncompetitive. As the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported recently: "In 1999, 2001
and 2003, when Congress temporarily killed the credits, the number of new turbines dropped dramatically."
These subsidies will be renewed in the new administration, but to "invest" in wind and solar to replace
fossil fuels will be expensive. (IBD)
Alberta Mulls New Wind Power Lines - CALGARY - Wind
power developments planned in the Canadian province of Alberta will require C$1.83 billion (US$1.5 billion) in new
transmission lines to connect the electricity to markets, the province's system operator said on Tuesday.
(Reuters)
Enel to Launch Two US Geothermal Plants in Q1 - MILAN
- Italy's biggest utility, Enel, will launch two geothermal plants with a total capacity of 65 megawatt (MW) in
Nevada in the first quarter of 2009 aiming to expand in the US renewable energy market, it said on Monday.
(Reuters)
German Wind Industry in Talks for State Aid: Report -
FRANKFURT - The German wind energy federation BWE is in talks with the German environment ministry over state
support for companies in the sector as the financial crisis bites, a German newspaper reported.
"The expansion of renewable energy and climate protection will stall unless the current situation
improves," Hermann Albers, president of BWE, told Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in an interview to be
published on Wednesday.
The financial crisis was slowing growth in the sector, mainly because project financing was becoming increasingly
difficult and more expensive, especially for off-shore wind parks, he said. (Reuters)
Fat discrimination tax -
It made the financial news today, because everyone knows it’s not really about health. But even the numbers
don’t add up.
New York Governor, David Paterson, is reported as proposing a 15% tax on sugar-sweetened sodas, calling it an
obesity tax. That makes it sound like it has a noble intention of public health concerns over obesity, when, as
the Financial Times noted, it’s really just a way to raise money to help address the state’s $13.3 billion
deficit. (Junkfood Science)
Oh... With increasing obesity, fuel consumption
becomes weighty matter -- Excess fuel consumption caused by excess driver and passenger weight has increased
in the past two years, with no end in sight.
In a widely publicized study in fall 2006, University of Illinois computer science professor Sheldon H. Jacobson
and doctoral student Laura McLay estimated the amount of vehicle fuel consumed as a result of overweight and obese
passengers.
Now, in a new study by Jacobson and doctoral student Douglas King, current estimates of weight-based fuel
consumption were calculated and compared with those reported in 2006. The results are not good news. (PhysOrg.com)
Environmental
groups, scientists cheer Obama appointments - With a Nobel physicist and a former EPA chief on board, some
expect Obama's White House to break from what they see as the Bush administration's record of overlooking science
in favor of politics. (Los Angeles Times)
Given that environment and environmentalism is 100% prime time politics and nothing but politics that would
seem unlikely.
Marty's off with the chemical tinkerbells again: Groups
urge BPA ban in all food packaging - Canada is the first country in the world to propose banning plastic baby
bottles made from bisphenol A, but an influential coalition of public health and environmental advocates says the
federal government hasn't gone far enough and should also protect pregnant women from the controversial chemical.
The bottle ban, announced by Health Canada with great fanfare earlier this year, was put in place as a precaution
to minimize exposures for babies under 18 months.
But the groups want the government also to ban the chemical in all food packaging, including cans, based on
worries that mothers are ingesting it through food and inadvertently exposing their fetuses.
"Protecting infants against BPA is not enough. We need to protect the fetus, and that means protecting the
mother," said Barbara McElgunn, health policy adviser for the Learning Disabilities Association of Canada.
The association was one of the 22 groups that yesterday called on the federal government to introduce the
wide-ranging food packaging ban. (Globe and Mail)
'crakes don't like cooling temperatures? Corncrake
numbers 'show decline' - The number of corncrakes in Scotland is estimated to have fallen for the first time
in a decade, it has been warned.
RSPB Scotland said the population of calling males had dropped by about 8%, from 1,236 in 2007 to 1,140 this year.
(BBC News)
Nutrient
Control Actions for Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin and Northern Gulf of Mexico - A
large area of coastal waters in the northern Gulf of Mexico experiences seasonal conditions of low levels of
dissolved oxygen, a condition known as hypoxia. Excess discharge of nutrients into the Gulf of Mexico from the
Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers causes nutrient overenrichment in the gulf's coastal waters and stimulates the
growth of large algae blooms. When these algae die, the process of decomposition depletes dissolved oxygen from
the water column and creates hypoxic conditions.
In considering how to implement provisions of the Clean Water Act to strengthen nutrient reduction objectives
across the Mississippi River basin, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requested advice from the
National Research Council. This book represents the results of the committee's investigations and deliberations,
and recommends that the EPA and U.S. Department of Agriculture should jointly establish a Nutrient Control
Implementation Initiative to learn more about the effectiveness of actions meant to improve water quality
throughout the Mississippi River basin and into the northern Gulf of Mexico. Other recommendations include how to
move forward on the larger process of allocating nutrient loading caps -- which entails delegating
responsibilities for reducing nutrient pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorus -- across the basin. (National
Academies Press)
Virtual world guesstimates: Corn pests
to thrive as global climate warms-study - CHICAGO, Dec 16 - Populations of insects that feed on corn and other
crops in the United States may flourish and expand to new territory as global climate change brings warmer summers
and milder winters in the decades ahead, according to a new study.
More frequent or more severe pest infestations may cut crop yields and drive up the price of corn, used for food
and animal feed and to produce renewable fuels. (Reuters)
GM
crops: environment ministry proposes, Ramadoss opposes - NEW DELHI: The environment ministry might be planning
to bring genetically modified (GM) crops like Bt Brinjal to your plate but Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss has
promised to "continue to oppose" GM foods.
Ramadoss, in a meeting with hundreds of farmers organised by his party PMK in Kancheepuram town of Tamil Nadu last
week, promised to resist the entry of GM foods for common use.
"The PMK has always opposed GM seeds. As a minister of PMK and as union health minister, I will continue to
oppose GM seeds," he said.
"As far as Bt Brinjal is concerned, it was brought to the country without proper research on its
safety," he added. According to health ministry officials, the minister has also discussed with top health
officials his stand on GM crops.
Hailing the strong stand of Ramadoss and favouring the anti-GM movement, the Coalition for GM Free India has
written a letter of appreciation to the health ministry. (Economic Times)
December 16, 2008
Green team:
Obama’s choices will challenge Inhofe - No one enjoys debating global warming more than U.S. Sen. Jim
Inhofe. Yet the sledding ahead looks to be decidedly tougher for the Tulsa Republican, given the environmental
team President-elect Barack Obama is assembling and Democrats’ strengthened majorities in Congress.
Advertisement
Inhofe has led the charge against Al Gore, the United Nations’ climate panel, celebrity activists and others who
argue human activity is the chief cause of warming. Last week he publicized a report that some 650 scientists
disagree with the idea that people are causing global warming.
But the balance of power in Washington will change in January. Obama will be sworn in, and with him will come
experienced proponents of global warming countermeasures.
The New York Times reports Carol Browner, a Gore disciple and Bill Clinton’s Environmental Protection Agency
administrator, will lead climate and energy policy at the White House. (The Oklahoman)
Good thing Inhofe is there then, isn't it.
Oh my... Michael
McCarthy: A sliver of cheer on climate change - Listening to Gore, I even felt hope myself, as the world felt
hope on Obama's election
Optimism is one of the strangest of human conditions, not least because when it strikes, it often affects the most
rational of beings. There have been occasional outbursts of it in history: we think of the Renaissance, when
Rabelais was so sure of the benignity of human nature that he made the motto of his abbey of Thélème "do
what you wish", or the French Revolution, when the revolutionary armies were at first irresistible, so great
was their belief that they were the vanguard of a new life.
Most of all, we think of the founding of the United States, the nation that sprang from the 18th-century
Enlightenment and its unshakeable belief in the power of reason, the original Optimistic Society: at its heart is
the belief that anyone can become president, a belief which after more than two centuries, Barack Obama has
triumphantly vindicated.
I was vividly put in mind of the American optimistic tradition on Friday, in a conference hall in Poznan, Poland,
listening to a speech by Al Gore, the former US vice president and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for alerting
the world to the dangers of climate change. (The Independent)
Polar
Bears, Climate Change, and Human Dignity - Polar bears are recognized worldwide as living symbols of the
Arctic, and have recently become prominent symbols in international campaigns to combat global climate change. On
May 14, 2008 a slightly different symbolic association was presented to the world. Against a backdrop of American
flags and large photos of polar bears, the US Secretary of the Interior announced his government’s decision to
list polar bears worldwide as a threatened species due to declining Arctic sea ice. Explicit in the same
announcement was the current US administration’s clear determination to prevent this listing under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) from being used to regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) or obstruct energy
developments deemed vital to US interests.
While at first glance this listing may seem like a victory in the fight against climate change, the outcomes are
likely to be complex and may take some time to become clear. Legal challenges have already begun, from
environmental groups seeking to force governmental action on GHGs, the State of Alaska challenging the US
government’s science, and aggrieved American hunters who can no longer import the polar bear hides from their
guided hunts in Canada. A new US administration might very well decide to take action on GHGs, but the initial
decision will at the very least delay development of substantive, practical, and effective polar bear conservation
policies which are urgently needed. The primary criterion for appraising any policy decision is whether it is
likely to resolve the problem it is intended to address: the “threatened” listing fails this most basic test.
Further, that decision ensures that the only costs of listing polar bears are borne by a relatively few US
citizens – plus the Canadian Inuit and Inuvialuit communities that, until this spring, derived an important
source of seasonal income from those hunts. What, if anything, should be done? (Douglas Clark, Martina Tyrrell,
Martha Dowsley, A. Lee Foote, Milton Freeman and Susan G. Clark, SPPI)
EU Climate Plan Cut to Shreds - Industry lobbyists again
triumphed this week in Brussels. Coal-fired power plants in East and Central European countries won the right to a
delayed payment schedule for emissions credits. German industry won the right to future concessions if a study
deems that the EU ETS renders them less competitive on the global market. Although it was never entirely clear
what Italy wanted (some believed that the Italian delegation threatened to veto the package to win concessions for
the Italian car industry in upcoming negotiations), Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi told AFP that
"Italy is on the way to getting all it wants.” The gutted agreement infuriated environmentalists. (William
Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Klaus: Climate issues
are silly luxury good - Czech president hits at EU climate deal
PRAGUE, Dec 12 (AFP) - Czech President Václav Klaus hit out at the EU climate [20-20-2020-20-20] deal concluded
Friday and described global climate issues as "a silly luxury."
"I do not like the way they forced it", Klaus said shortly after an agreement was announced in Brussels.
He also claimed that his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy had "pushed" the deal so that it would not
be left when the Czech Republic takes over the EU presidency from France on January 1.
"This is scandalous," he said. "We should have been able to discuss it during our presidency, to
force it now is not very good."
"Environmental issues are a luxury good," Klaus added. "Now we have to tighten our belt and to cut
the luxury." (The Reference Frame)
Inside the Beltway - It’s too bad they’re so capable,
experienced, and energetic because the energy and global warming policies that President-elect Obama wants them to
pursue are radical, economically disastrous, and pointless. As the Washington Post sub-headlined David A.
Fahrenthold’s article on Obama’s picks, “Their goals will be radical, but the three officials tapped to lead
effort are experienced regulators.” (Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads Digest)
Dead wrong: Australia's Climate-Change Winners & Losers
- SYDNEY - The only clear, outright winners from Australia's climate-change policy unveiled on Monday are the
accountants and lawyers who will have to make sense of it.
Losers, on the other hand, are everywhere.
They include coal-fired power stations, mainly in government hands or unlisted, and some of the local stock
market's biggest firms, such as smelters BlueScope Steel and OneSteel, and refiner Alumina Ltd, analysts say.
Around 1,000 of the largest polluters, ranging from transport operators and aluminum makers to gas producers and
petroleum refineries, will have to pay to pollute from 2010, under a government plan to cut national greenhouse
gas emissions by 5-15 percent by 2020.
Gas firms Woodside Petroleum and Santos, and refiner Caltex Australia will have to pay for permits to pollute.
Qantas Airways will also face carbon costs via higher fuel prices or the need to buy permits, or both. (Reuters)
This is not about pollution at all but rather the essential trace gas carbon dioxide. The whole thing is a
nonsense placing a discouragement tax on enterprises feeding the biosphere. About as anti green as it gets and
too absurd for words.
Solar
protection - LOWER-INCOME households, pensioners, business and industry will receive more than $11 billion a
year to compensate for increased costs caused by the emissions trading scheme.
Families and singles on high incomes, however, will be worse off under the scheme, which was locked in yesterday
to begin on July 1, 2010 - only months before the next election is due.
Billed as the biggest economic upheaval since the 1980s deregulation of the economy, the scheme was tweaked to
accommodate the demands of industry in lean economic times. (Sydney Morning Herald)
<chuckle> Greenpeace,
WWF damn paper on climate change - THE Federal Government's white paper on climate change received only muted
praise from industry but outright hostility from the environment movement.
Environment and community groups reacted angrily. Sixty of them joined to condemn the Government's target range.
The range of between 5 and 15 per cent was "a total failure of climate policy and shows that the Rudd
Government has caved in to pressure from the big polluters", the groups, including Greenpeace and WWF, said.
(Sydney Morning Herald)
Check out these twits: Critics
of Rudd's emissions strategy plan sandbagging protest - The offices of MPs around Australia will be sandbagged
in a graphic protest by environmental group Friends of the Earth (FOE).
FOE members are angered by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's announcement yesterday that the federal government will
seek to cut Australia's carbon emissions by five per cent by 2020, spokesman Damien Lawson says.
From 10am (midday NZST) today, mock climate emergency services workers will begin sandbagging MPs' electoral
offices to protect them from rising sea levels FOE says will result from climate change.
"A five per cent target locks Australia into runaway climate change. This target will not stop drought, it
will not save the Great Barrier Reef, and it will not prevent ice melting and the sea rising," Mr Lawson
said.
"This is an emergency and the government must act within this term. Our carbon emissions must peak in the
next year and then continuously decrease if we are to have any hope of avoiding catastrophic climate change."
Mr Lawson said emissions cuts of 40 to 50 per cent by 2020 were needed, and the government should also consider
former US vice-president Al Gore's call for a 100 per cent switch to renewable energy by the same year. (AP, AAP)
They sound like they really believe the gorebull warming propaganda -- no wonder they were gullible enough to
believe K.Rudd (poor saps probably even voted for him :))
Excuse me? Scientists
predict a hot and bleak future - SOME climate scientists have turned on the Federal Government, calling for
"scientific honesty" after it delivered its target range for emissions cuts of between 5 and 15 per cent
yesterday.
The mainstream scientific community believes much deeper cuts are needed more quickly and that yesterday's
announcement all but locks Australia into a hot and rather bleak future.
The modest cuts for 2020 are seen as marking a fork in the road in Australia's approach to climate change, with
the Government proceeding down one route and the research that underpins the need for emissions cuts heading down
another. (Sydney Morning Herald)
And uh, what research would that be that allegedly underpins the need for emission cuts? They can only be
talking about PlayStation® climatology, computer game manipulation of non-existent worlds which has no
demonstration application in the real world. Sorry guys. While process models can certainly help us make sense
of observations and aid our efforts to understand what is happening they are completely valueless when it comes
to prognostication. At this time the only known climate risk is climate hysteria and panicked attempts to
address a pretend problem.
Burning
concerns about Captain Reasonable - BEHIND closed doors Kevin Rudd has sometimes described his political
persona as "Captain Reasonable".
And it was the captain who took the podium at the National Press Club yesterday, calm, controlled, and, most of
all, moderate.
He described climate change as an elephant of an issue, but then proposed not doing anything especially big about
it.
He called it "a threat to our people, our nation and our planet", but then announced only the gentlest
of responses.
He said the country stood at "the crossroads of history", but then suggested that we choose the course
of least resistance.
For heaven's sake, he seemed to be saying, can't we all just be reasonable.
Rudd's carbon emissions plan is crafted as a piece of political positioning, and he said as much himself:
"We will be attacked from the far right for taking any action at all," he said early in his speech.
"We will be attacked from parts of the far left for not going far enough. The Government believes we have got
the balance right." (Sydney Morning Herald)
Give us
time: Wong defends modest climate target - Penny Wong has defended the federal government's modest greenhouse
gas reduction targets, saying it will take time to tackle climate change.
The climate change minister, who made way for Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to announce the targets on Monday, said
the economy would become greener over time.
"We have to build a low pollution economy of the future, that is going to take some time," she told Sky
News. (AAP)
Societe Generale Cuts EU Carbon Emissions Forecast - LONDON -
Societe Generale cut its forecasts for European Union industrial emissions, saying an EU recession may depress EU
carbon permit prices for years.
Prices for carbon permits traded under the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme in 2009 could average 17 euros a tonne,
down a third from a previous forecast of 25.5 euros, it said.
"Prospects on emission levels for 2008 and 2009 reduce every day, with an increasing number of industrial
firms announcing temporary shutdown ... and downward revised output productions for next year," SocGen carbon
analyst Emmanuel Fages said.
The bank said EU Allowances could rise to 20 euros by 2012, down sharply from estimates of 37 euros made earlier
this year and significantly below the 30 euros a tonne level experts say is needed to encourage corporate
investment in clean technology. (Reuters)
Scientists Urge Caution in Ocean-CO2 Capture Schemes - SINGAPORE -
To some entrepreneurs, the wild and icy seas between Australia and Antarctica could become a money spinner by
engineering nature to soak up carbon dioxide and then selling carbon credits worth millions of dollars.
To some scientists and many nations, though, the concept of using nature to mop up mankind's excess CO2 to fight
global warming is fraught with risk and uncertainty.
An analysis by a leading Australian research body has urged caution and says more research is crucial before
commercial ventures are allowed to fertilize oceans on a large scale and over many years to capture CO2. (Reuters)
Forget all that -- atmospheric carbon dioxide is a resource that we do not want to waste.
Emerging
Arctic Amplification by Mark C. Serreze and Andrew P. Barrett - Guest Weblog by Mark C. Serreze and Andrew P.
Barrett, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
One of the most universal features of coupled global climate model simulations is that atmospheric greenhouse gas
loading will lead to an especially strong rise in surface air temperature (SAT) in the Arctic [Holland and Bitz
2003; Serreze and Francis 2006]. From hereon, this will be referred to as Arctic amplification.
As part of a recent study [Serreze et al. 2008] we looked at expressions of Arctic amplification through the 21st
century from the NCAR CCSM3 and other coupled global models participating in the IPCC-AR4, all using the same
(A1B) emissions scenario. The following features stand out: 1) A pattern of rising SAT in the cold season
strongest in the northern high latitudes which develops a clear Arctic Ocean focus as the decades pass; 2) a
distinctive vertical structure of the ocean-focused temperature change, with warming becoming stronger from the
lower troposphere toward the surface; 3) much smaller high latitude temperature rises in summer.
The explanation often offered for Arctic amplification is albedo feedback. As SAT rises, some of the Arctic’s
high albedo sea ice and snow cover melts. This exposes darker underlying surfaces, which readily absorb solar
radiation, leading to a further rise in SAT. An obvious problem with this argument is that model projected
Arctic amplification is only prominent in the cold-season, when, depending on month and latitude, there is little
or no solar radiation to speak of. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science) [em added]
A flaw we have been highlighting for years -- nice to see they actually recognize it. Sadly they still seem
to view model output as equivalent to empirical data (a very common problem among virtual worlders) and will
actually reject real world observations which do not agree with modeled expectations (also regrettably common in
PlayStation® climatology).
As Ice Melts, Antarctic Bedrock Is on the Move - As ice
melts away from Antarctica, parts of the continental bedrock are rising in response -- and other parts are
sinking, scientists have discovered. (Ohio State University)
They found the models to be [gasp] incorrect? They don't know whether the Antarctic is losing or gain ice?
But, but...
Possible indication of ocean cooling: Defying
Predictions, Sea Level Rise Begins to Slow - World's oceans rise slower since 2005, fail to display predicted
accelerating trend.
Satellite altimetry data indicates that the rate at which the world's oceans are rising has slowed significantly
since 2005. Before the decrease, sea level had been rising by more than 3mm/year, which corresponds to an increase
of about one foot per century. Since 2005, however, the rate has been closer to 2mm/year.
The decrease is significant as global climate models predict sea level rise to accelerate as atmospheric CO2
continues to increase. In the 1990s, when such acceleration appeared to be occurring, some scientists pointed to
it as confirmation the models were operating correctly. (Michael Asher, Daily Tech)
Oh... Warming climate signals big changes for ski
areas, says University of Colorado study - Rocky Mountain ski areas face dramatic changes this century as the
climate warms, including best-case scenarios of shortened ski seasons and higher snowlines and worst-case
scenarios of bare base areas and winter rains, says a new Colorado study. (University of Colorado)
... try looking up from your 'puter screens and check out what is happening in the real world. Dopey
blighters!
Scientists
Denounce AP For Hysterical Global Warming Article - Scientists from around the world are denouncing an
Associated Press article hysterically claiming that global warming is "a ticking time bomb" about to
explode, and that we're "running out of time" to do anything about it. (NewsBusters)
The Horner
Chris-tal Ball - Seth Borenstein is not entirely alone in still foolishly playing the old game. He is joined
by the Washington Post, which continues its contortions to blame President Bush for Kyoto’s failure here. For
example, first the Post asserted that Bush “refused to ratify” the treaty. Ah, nice try, but that would be the
Senate’s job actually, as they kindly allowed me to correct them.
This Sunday they regressed, editorializing that, well . . . um . . . then the U.S. actually refused to sign the
treaty. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
OK. Whatever, people. Maybe some couch time will help deal with the looming terror of the forthcoming January 20
expiration date for this obsession with distracting from just telling us who did what (and “why” would also
help). But the smarter among the media set have moved on — in fact, precisely as I predicted. (Chris Horner,
Planet Gore)
Steven Chu vs a sane homeowner
- A few days ago, Marc Morano received some credit from a Joe Romm - the cheerleader-in-chief at recent wild
orgies celebrating the death of Michael Crichton - for having determined that Steven Chu, the future U.S.
secretary of energy, is not quite psychiatrically OK (much like many similar participants of the Poznań
conference) when it comes to warmophobia and related disorders.
Well, your humble correspondent would like to modestly inform everyone that it is me, and not Marc Morano, who has
figured it out. ;-) Thanks!
To see why Steven Chu is psychiatrically impaired, let us look at his new talk about the ... electrical wiring.
After a small fire in your house, a woman comes to your house and tells you that you have to pay $20,000 to get a
new wiring, otherwise your house will burn in a few years at the 50% confidence level.
Chu's opinion is that it would be foolish to "look for" an expert who says that the new wiring is not
necessary. Clearly, you must trust the woman and her first friend who says the same thing, he says: you have to
pay $20,000. In the same way, the United States of America (and perhaps other countries as well) must immediately
sacrifice a part of the national economy, too, in order to avoid the burning house - a planet, in this case - in a
few years.
It's not his money, after all, so why wouldn't he sacrifice it? Why wouldn't he give up essential liberty to
obtain a little temporary safety? (The Reference Frame)
Green Cars For Cheap Gas
- CHURCHVILLE, VA—Now we’re going to give Ford, GM and Chrysler billions of dollars so the Feds can order them
to build more “green” cars—with gas now costing $1.49 per gallon. How many Americans will pay $30,000 for
one of these new high-mileage lightweights instead of getting a family-protective SUV for the same bucks? Or a
pickup to pull the boat? At $1.49 per gallon, not many. So Detroit will go broke again, unless the Feds slap on
another $3 per gallon in gas tax.
Haven’t we just been there? And we didn’t like it much. We demanded, “Drill, baby, drill.” We forced a
liberal Democratic Congress that hates oil to end the drilling ban on public lands. Thus, we could pump more
domestic gas and oil and bring down the price—so Detroit’s old lineup of SUVs and big pickups would sell
again.
Which way are we going? And why? (Dennis T. Avery, CGFI)
Chinese Government Delays Sinopec Acquisition
- Chinese refining giant Sinopec is still waiting for government approval that will allow it to buy Canada’s
Tanganyika Oil, whose upstream assets are largely in Syria. Sinopec’s awaiting the endorsement of the powerful
National Development & Reform Commission, and the company has pushed back the closure of the $1.94 billion
deal until December 19. (Lee Geng, Energy Tribune)
It’s a Gas, Gas, Gas: The Paradigm Shift in the
U.S. Natural Gas Business - The collapse in oil prices gets most of the headlines. But the corresponding
collapse in natural gas prices may be the more important story for both the short- and long-term interests of the
U.S.
On July 1, natural gas futures peaked at $13.51. On July 14, crude oil futures peaked at $145.16 per barrel.
Today, the spot price for natural gas is about $5.67 and the spot price for oil is about $46. And those prices may
go lower still. On November 24, Jen Snynder, the head of North American gas research for the energy consulting
firm Wood Mackenzie, released a report which she claimed that the U.S. gas market should expect to see natural gas
prices “in the range of $5 to $6” for the next five years.
While many analysts have discounted Snyder’s prediction, the potential for a long-term slowdown in natural gas
drilling in the U.S. could have devastating effects on the drillers and oilfield service companies. The number of
rigs drilling for gas usually outnumber those looking for oil by more than 3 to 1. But now that the U.S. is awash
in gas, a drastic slowdown in drilling has begun. That can be seen by looking at the latest rig count numbers from
Baker Hughes. And Texas, the biggest natural gas producer in the country, provides a good barometer for the trend.
In September, an average of 946 rigs were working in the Lone Star State. By the first week in December, the
number of active rigs in Texas had fallen to 852. (Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
Rudd
digs deep for coal sector - BUSINESSES, community organisations and coalmining communities not eligible for
direct compensation under the emissions trading scheme have not been forgotten, with a $2.5 billion special fund
set aside to help them adapt.
The Climate Change Action Fund will be available to pay for energy-saving measures that would reduce operating
costs.
As well, there will be help for the coal sector that could otherwise be at risk as a consequence of the scheme,
threatening jobs and communities in predominantly Labor seats. (Sydney Morning Herald)
And this little piggy got none: Renewable
energy boom set to go up in smoke - UNTIL yesterday the so-called "green revolution" was ready to
roll, but the renewable energy industry doubts the Government's white paper will allow it to get out of first
gear.
The fear is that since carbon permits are limited to $25 a tonne, and many are being given away, the emissions
trading scheme will simply add a little lead to the saddlebags of heavy polluters without giving enough incentive
for investors to switch to emissions-free technology.
"There's no doubt the white paper is actually undermining the potential for green-collar jobs in
Australia," Mark Diesendorf, the deputy director of the Institute of Environmental Studies at the University
of NSW, said.
"We've put up a message that says to investors 'stay away'. (Sydney Morning Herald)
CCDNet letter on CCS: Dear Benny,
For several years now, "clean" coal, involving carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, has been
touted as the means of mitigating global warming, supposedly arising from fossil-fuel-burning power stations. But,
of course, this necessarily comes at a considerable price increase for electricity.
It is not well-known that a huge drawback to the substantially unproven CCS process is that every cubic metre of
(solid) coal that is burnt produces about six cubic metres of liquefied CO2. (The actual amount of super-critical
fluid, or near-liquid, CO2, is based on complete combustion of the coal, its complete capture, and the actual
carbon content of the coal ... an 80% carbon coal yields six cu. metres of near-liquid CO2.)
It doesn't take an Einstein to realise the immense logistics and difficulties of dealing with the around-sixfold
increase in volume from coal to near-liquid CO2. Unless power generators have a ready sink in which to inject the
voluminous CO2 (such as a depleted oil well), it won't take long before multiple injection points have to be
created, because the CO2 will readily exhaust the brine-filled pores of a deep, geologically acceptable rock
stratum, such as sandstone (which must have an impermeable caprock anyway). If the geosequestration point is well
away from the power station, huge costs in infrastructure to transport the large volumes of near-liquid CO2
(pipelines or tankers) will be inevitable.
Apart from the above, it is easy to gloss over other problems with the CO2, once underground. The volumes have to
be retained in the rock forever, which is a huge ask, because near-liquid CO2 has extremely low viscosity and will
sneak out of any fissure. Also, the CO2, being acidic, is highly reactive to organic and mineral constituents,
possibly leading to fouling of aquifers for human or animal consumption.
"Clean" coal does not appear to be a realistic solution.
John Harborne (MIEAust, CPEng, retired metallurgist) Via CCNet
China Powers Down: Electricity Providers are Hit
Hard by High Coal Prices and Lowered Power Demand - China’s electricity providers will lose some $10.3
billion this year after being hit by higher coal prices and sagging power demand. Through October, the country's
top five power generators posted losses of $3.94 billion, a sum that includes over $500 million in losses by the
country’s biggest generator, China Huaneng Group, and some $963 million by China Guodian Corp. Losses at the
other big producers include an $882 million loss China Datang Corp., an $880 million loss at China Huadian Corp.,
and a $713 million shortfall at China Power Investment Corp.
About 90 percent of the thermal power plants owned by the top five power companies are losing money, and 70
percent of them have a deficit of at least $14.7 million. Most power producers incurred major losses in the first
half of this year when coal price soared to record highs. But as coal prices moderated, demand for electricity
declined. The global recession has meant a big decline in demand for iron and steel. That has meant sharp
decreases in electricity demand from China’s metal producers, which have been leading the country’s demand for
increased electricity production. (Lee Geng, Energy Tribune)
China Coal Market Resets, Looks for Pollution
Reduction Technologies - China’s coal market, like other commodity markets, is going through tumultuous
times.
Prices have plunged in recent months, falling as low as $87 per ton, a steep drop from the $145 price level hit in
June. The downward pressure on coal prices will likely continue as stockpiles at ports and power plants continue
to grow due to the country’s slowing economy.
The price gyrations have led China's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission
to remove the price controls it imposed on coal in June. The agency will allow buyers and sellers to negotiate
prices based on market supply and demand next year. But the agency also made it clear that it will intervene if it
decides that prices are fluctuating too much. The agency imposed price controls last summer when coal prices were
soaring and power shortages were common. Today, coal prices are plunging and power demand is falling as China’s
export-oriented economy begins to feel the full effect of the global recession.
China obtains about 70 percent of its primary energy from coal. For comparison, the US and the rest of the world
draw slightly over 20 percent of their energy from coal. China’s heavy reliance on coal has resulted in
staggering air pollution problems. (Lee Geng and Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
Ad Populum - “Everyone uses and
loves this product!”
Making a product claim like this is a tried-and-true advertising technique. It’s hoped that you will take
others’ approval as a good enough reason to buy the product, too. Falling for this is a fallacy of logic called
Ad Populum (“appeal to popularity”) — going along with what’s popular. It’s right out of high school.
So, when a media release went out last week from the NCCAM Press Office (National Center for Complementary and
Alternative Medicine), saying that 38% of adults use complementary and alternative ‘medicine’, were you
tempted to think — even just for a moment — “Maybe, there is something to CAM.” (Junkfood Science)
China to Accelerate South-North Water Project - BEIJING - China
will accelerate construction of the south-to-north water diversion project next year, the Xinhua news agency
quoted the head of the project office, Zhang Jiyao, as saying.
The project, criticized by some environmentalists for encouraging the wasteful use of water, will divert water
from the Yangtze River in western and central China to arid northern regions through three channels: eastern,
middle and western. (Reuters)
December 15, 2008
The Crone searching for a downside: The
Oceans’ Shifting Balance - Most of us understand that what we give off in the form of exhaust — from cars
and manufacturing and energy production and burning forests — makes its way into the atmosphere, and is
responsible for changes in the global climate. What is less familiar is the fact that the oceans are absorbing as
much as a third of the carbon dioxide being emitted into the atmosphere.
The effects are already being felt. That added carbon dioxide is slowly making the oceans less alkaline and more
acidic, altering the chemical balance on which much of oceanic life depends. Carbon dioxide reacts with seawater
to form carbonic acid, a process that consumes carbonate ions. Those ions are necessary for the chemical reaction
used to form calcium carbonate, the structural element in corals and the shells of many marine animals.
As the oceans acidify, shells will simply dissolve. The growth of coral reefs will slow, and their structural
integrity would be weakened, making them more vulnerable to storms and erosion. That would be a catastrophic loss.
The list of potential long-term effects to oceanic life is only beginning to be explored. (New York Times)
Let's humor them for a moment and pretend corals would be troubled by reduced oceanic alkalinity from
increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (we know those are the kind of conditions under which corals evolved -- let
it go for a moment, alright?). Would this mean the hypothetical greenhouse world would reduce coral growth? Not
necessarily:
Ben McNeil of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, and colleagues modeled the
interactions between the atmosphere, oceans and ice, and calculated the sea surface temperature and the levels
of calcium carbonate in the water up to 2100. Then they estimated how these changes would affect the formation
of corals.
They found that warmer water would increase the rate of coral formation, or calcification, and that this would
outweigh the detrimental effect of lower levels of calcium carbonate in the seawater. They predict that by 2100
corals will be growing 35% faster than today. -- Geophysical Research Letters (DOI: 10.1029/ 2004GL021541)
So again the media play almost exclusively on hypothetical downsides to hypothetical conditions caused by
real human activity while burying any mention of equally plausible upsides to hypothetical conditions caused by
real human activity.
Should we ask the old girl how that's working out for circulation numbers?
Bravo
Manchester: “That Shouw’d ‘Em!” - The good citizens of Manchester have spoken for so many of us. We
are sick and tired of Government trying to impose cack-handed ‘Green’ taxes and higher costs onto us, and we
are especially angry about this in the current straightened economic circumstances.
The Manchester vote announced today is devastating for the Government. Greater Manchester’s proposal for
peak-time tolls of up to £5 a day was defeated by a majority of 4 to 1, with 79 per cent voting against. The
scheme was rejected in separate votes in all ten Greater Manchester boroughs taking part, in which just over a
million people voted out of 1.9 million balloted (a 53.2% turn out). A full report is available in the Manchester
Evening News. (Clamour Of The Times)
Survey:
Americans don’t want taxes used on global warming - While a majority of Americans believe the Earth is
warming, there is little support among the public to use tax money to address the issue, a new survey suggests.
(Daily Progress)
Indians
don't believe in global warming! - Despite economic downturn, Indian consumers put premium on products/brands
perceived to be socially responsible
BANGALORE, INDIA: Indians do not believe the environment is in crisis, but they think it is important to take
environmentally-friendly actions and it is a high priority for them. Hence, 88 percent of Indian consumers are
prepared to pay more for goods that are environmentally friendly against 82 percent in China. In Japan, only 68
percent of consumers feel the environment is the most important issue.
Unlike their peers in every other country, respondents in India believe there is too much fuss about the
environment (79 percent) and they do not believe the world is experiencing global warming (56 percent). Still, 92
percent feel it is their duty to contribute to a better society and environment.
These are some of the interesting findings to emerge from a study of consumers in India, China and Japan, part of
a 10-market global study called 'goodpurpose' conducted by Edelman, the world's largest independent PR firm. (CyberMedia
India Online)
Let's
get real on the environment - After the failure in Poznan, it's time to be honest: the world is not going to
be cutting greenhouse gases anytime soon
The world's environmental leaders have spent the past two weeks meeting in Poznan, Poland, pretending that they're
carrying on the fight against global warming first addressed by the Kyoto Protocol.
You recall the Kyoto Protocol. It was never ratified by the United States – defeated 95-0 in the US Senate in
1997, in fact – and has proven just as ineffective elsewhere around the world. It was supposed to be first step
in the world's cutback of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide that are warming our atmosphere.
The hard truth be told, essentially none of those who signed onto the treaty have been able to cutback their
greenhouse gas emissions.
People – surprise, surprise – demand to be warm at the cheapest prices. Developing countries like China and
India have ignored it completely, with their emission rising at 6% to 8% a year. China now emits more greenhouse
gases than even the United States. (David Appell, The Guardian)
Good thing increasing the essential atmospheric trace gas carbon dioxide is a major environmental plus then,
isn't it.
Yes, it's still a mere trace gas.
Yes, it's absolutely essential for most life on Earth.
No, it does not present a danger now, nor in any foreseeable human future.
No, humans cannot emit sufficient to push it to toxic levels -- ever.
No, no amount of "carbon constraint" will measurably affect the planet's temperature over the next
50 years.
No, we can not knowingly and predictably affect the planet's climate by twiddling with a few trivial
variables in a complex coupled non-linear chaotic system.
Does that clear it up any for you?
Melting
Moments - Is Kevin Rudd wilting under the heat of global warming?
Only last year the Labor leader was brimming with evangelical fervour as he pronounced climate change as ''the
greatest moral challenge of our time''.
Climate change, the Prime Minister said, ''threatens the security and stability of us all'', and a failure to act
would be judged harshly by future generations.
But now we see the Government's moral resolve melting away before our eyes.
After the initial symbolic act of signing Kyoto, the Government has been slowly but steadily downsizing its
rhetoric and expectations.
The cooling-off from the pre-election passion began immediately after signing the Kyoto Protocol at the Bali
climate conference, when the Prime Minister shocked environmental supporters by distancing himself from tougher
short-term targets being agreed to by other countries.
Those targets of between 25 and 40per cent reductions by 2020 were said by scientists from the United Nations'
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to be necessary to limit global warming to acceptably low levels.
Fast-forward to the present, and the Government's emissions targets, set to be announced on Monday, are reported
to be as low as a 5 to 15 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020.
The weakening is even more pronounced when you take into account that the 5 to 15 per cent target is based on a
baseline of emissions in 2000, where the United Nations uses the tougher baseline of emissions in 1990. (Canberra
Times)
K.Rudd sets 5pc greenhouse
gas emissions cut target - AUSTRALIA will set an "unconditional" 2020 target of reducing greenhouse
gas emissions of just 5 per cent if the world fails to act on climate change. (The Australian) | CARBON
REDUCTION: Read the white paper | Biggest
polluters win significant compensation (The Australian)
Indigenous communities warned over
'carbon-baggers' - There are claims that unscrupulous carbon brokers have been approaching Indigenous
communities and trying to sign them up to questionable carbon trading deals. (Australian Broadcasting Corp.)
By definition all hot air are trades are "questionable" (despicable?). Love the term "carbon
baggers" though.
Al Gore Rouses UN Climate Talks to More Action -
POZNAN - Former Vice President Al Gore urged weary climate delegates to agree a new climate treaty next year and
drew loud cheers on the last day of difficult two-week UN climate talks on Friday.
The talks were on course to meet a minimum goal, to sign off on a fund to help poor nations prepare for global
warming, but they were likely to delay any decision on climate targets. (Reuters)
Ozone Man goads climate delegates to historic inaction?
Interim
Climate Pact Approved - Tough Negotiations to Combat Global Warming Are Postponed
POZNAN, Poland, Dec. 13 -- The effort to come up with a global warming treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol
inched forward Saturday morning as delegates to United Nations-sponsored talks here agreed on a narrowly framed
interim document that leaves all the difficult negotiating until next year.
The modest result leaves the three-year process far short of the goal of concluding a binding agreement by the end
of 2009 to curb greenhouse gas emissions and slow the planet's warming, which under current conditions scientists
predict will reach dangerous and irreversible levels by the end of the century, if not sooner.
Given the minimal progress made in negotiations this year, several key players said, it will almost certainly take
direct involvement by President-elect Barack Obama and other world leaders to produce a meaningful agreement next
year.
Much of this meeting's negotiations focused on highly technical details, including how to measure deforestation
and how to legally define an international fund aimed at helping poor countries adapt to climate change. But the
core questions -- how much industrialized countries will slash their emissions, what they expect in return from
major emerging economies, and what they will do to help poorer countries pursue low-carbon development -- remained
untouched.
The meeting brought a large crowd to this modest industrial city -- nearly 4,000 delegates and 5,500 observers,
activists and journalists -- and produced a work plan that increased the planned number of negotiating sessions
next year in an effort to forge a final deal by the time the global talks convene again in Copenhagen in December.
(Juliet Eilperin, Washington)
Climate
Change: Much Ado About Nothing - Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus - “The mountains labour, forth
will creep a mouse”. This classical proverbial iambic line is customarily used of people or projects that are
all display and no substance. The phrase was widely employed in both the Greek and the Roman worlds, and in Greek
it seems to have been an anapaestic line. The phrase was also famously mentioned by Horace in his Ars Poetica, or
The Epistle to the Pisones (18 BC). The source of the saying is unknown, but it may well derive from one of
Aesop’s Fables about a group of rustics who are mesmerized by a heaving mountain side. The peasants believe that
this is a mighty sign, and that perhaps the Titans will break out once more to renew their war against the Gods.
However, after a long time of waiting and watching, a tiny mouse [picture*] creeps from the ground to much
embarrassed laughter: “At last, and at last, a teeny, tiny mouse poked its little head and bristles out of the
gap and came running down towards them, and ever after they used to say: ‘MUCH OUTCRY, LITTLE OUTCOME.’”
The ‘Global Warming’ Mouse
Can the application of this lovely proverb have ever been more apposite than in the case of the EU Summit on
climate change and the Poznan Climate Meeting, both of which concluded yesterday? Despite the
increasingly-desperate attempts of the French President and Summit Chair, Nicolas Sarkozy (“quite historic”),
of the EU Commission President, José Manuel Durão Barroso (“the most ambitious proposals anywhere in the
world”), and of the odd unreconstructed BBC reporter and analyst, like poor old Roger Harrabin, to put a spin on
the outcomes of these two meetings, it is absolutely clear that the world is, at last, slowly rowing back from the
dangerous weirs of ‘global warming’ politics and economics.
Let’s be blunt: the Poznan Meeting was a disgrace. After two weeks, more than 10,000 delegates and 145 ministers
could produce absolutely nothing except the release of some money (peanuts by comparison to credit crunch figures)
to aid poorer countries with climate adaptation. Even I can go along with that. They are all waiting for some
fairy tale solution to appear in Copenhagen next year, for their ugly duckling to turn into a swan. There will be
no fairy tale; indeed, their ugly duckling could well drown in the economic floods. Moreover, at the even more
hypocritical EU Summit, Italy, Poland, along with many other EU countries, douched the whole ‘global warming’
agenda in a cold shower of reality, with coal-burning power stations and heavy industries gaining (much-needed, I
might add) reprieves. As The Times rightly reports, the down-hearted ‘Greens’ have not been been fooled by the
spin:
“But Greenpeace, the WWF and other environmental groups denounced the agreement as ‘a dark day for European
climate policy’ despite the commitment to retain the headline target of 20 per cent CO2 cuts by 2020.
‘European heads of state and government have turned their backs on global efforts to fight climate change,’
they said in a joint statement.”
So do not be fooled by uncritical BBC reports and newspaper stories. ‘Global warming’ is truly on the wane. (Clamour
Of The Times)
Berlusconi hails EU
climate deal - Italian demands met but Europe must not 'foot bill' alone
Brussels, December 12 - Premier Silvio Berlusconi on Friday said he was satisfied that Italy's requests had been
accommodated in a compromise on the European Union's climate package.
''Once again our tactical ability has paid off,'' he said after the leaders of the 27 member states hammered out a
new deal on the climate package that takes the global economic crisis into account.
Berlusconi said Europe was now at the forefront of the battle against climate change but insisted that it could
not be ''left to foot the bill on its own''.
''The other carbon-dioxide emitting countries must also make a commitment at the Copenhagen world climate
conference in 2009,'' Berlusconi said.
The new deal accommodates two Italian demands that Foreign Minister Franco Frattini described as deal-breakers
earlier this week.
In one new clause, the entire climate package will be reviewed in March 2010 after the Copenhagen conference in
December 2009 in order to ensure Europe is not isolated, and therefore penalised economically, in its fight
against climate change.
In a second major concession to Italy, the Italian manufacturing sector will receive free 'polluting permits' when
European industries and companies have to start 'paying to pollute' via an auction system in 2013.
''No Italian jobs will be put in jeopardy and the manufacturing industry will be fully safeguarded,'' said Italian
EU Affairs Minister Andrea Ronchi. (ANSA)
Near-Paralysis at
UN Climate Talks Ends With Vow for New Treaty -- One hundred eighty-nine countries agreed to start formal
negotiations for a new treaty to fight global warming, following a two-week debate that exposed the gap they must
close between rich and poor nations.
The U.S., Canada and Japan rebuffed demands by developing countries for pledges to cut greenhouse-gas emissions at
the United Nations-led climate talks in Poznan, Poland. Requests by China and South Africa for more industrialized
nations to share clean-energy technologies got no support at the talks.
“Lots of proposals met with deafening silence,” Keya Chatterjee, an observer to the talks in Poznan, Poland
for the World Wildlife Fund. “We achieved only the minimum, which was to set an ambitious plan for next year.”
(Bloomberg)
Rich-poor rift adds hurdles to
climate deal - POZNAN, Poland, Dec 14 - World leaders led by President-elect Barack Obama may be needed to
help agree even a modest U.N. climate treaty in 2009 after a rift deepened between rich and poor nations over
funds and new goals to cut emissions.
The Poznan talks lacked the urgency and ambition of 2007, when they were launched at a meeting in Bali, Indonesia.
In Bali, a core group of 40 ministers stayed up one night in negotiations almost until dawn. One evening in
Poznan, when talks came to a crunch, many in the same group sent deputies to negotiate and went to a party.
(Reuters)
Poor
accuse rich of meanness in UN climate fight - POZNAN, Poland, Dec 13 - Developing nations accused the rich of
meanness on Saturday at the end of U.N. climate talks that launched only a tiny fund to help poor countries cope
with droughts, floods and rising seas.
They said the size of the Adaptation Fund -- worth just $80 million -- was a bad omen at the halfway mark of two
years of negotiations on a new treaty to fight global warming designed to be agreed in Copenhagen at the end of
2009. (Reuters)
We tried to warn you against basing your pleading for aid funds on a nonsense like gorebull warming. Are you
listening yet?
CLIMATE: As Bush departs, the world assesses his record on
global warming - POZNAN , Poland -- Don't expect teary-eyed farewells for President George W. Bush's climate
team, which is wrapping up its final U.N. negotiating session here this weekend.
"Bush will go down in history as possibly a person who has doomed the planet," declared Saleem Huq, a
lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's most recent report on adaptation.
"A blank page," Stephanie Tunmore of Greenpeace said. "That's the charitable view. If I were him,
I'd be very ashamed to admit to all the negative things that he's done and the positions he's taken -- which has
meant that, since Kyoto , this process has not moved forward very far at all."
Artur Runge-Metzger, head of a climate change division at the European Commission, tried to be diplomatic.
"They have delayed the process for a long time," he said.
And Keya Chatterjee, deputy director of the U.S. climate program at the World Wildlife Fund, faulted Bush for
spending two terms fighting mandatory curbs on domestic greenhouse gas emissions while censoring scientific
evidence linking man-made emissions to global warming.
"The last eight years have been pretty difficult for the science community at large, but particularly the
climate science community, who have felt largely ignored," she said. "It'll be a real relief for people
to feel like they've been listened to."
Bush administration officials, meanwhile, have been making the rounds here to promote what they say is their sound
record on climate and energy. They point to their setting of new energy efficiency targets for home appliances,
establishing a renewable fuel standard and toughening of automobile fuel-efficiency standards -- the first new
fuel-efficiency standards in more than three decades. (Greenwire -- subscription required)
But wait: Russia may not
join global deal on climate change - POZNAN, Poland - Russia may not join a new global deal to fight climate
change if it is against Moscow's interests and will set a national mid-term target for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions next year, an official said on Friday.
"If the conditions for the international agreement are not favorable for us we may not join such an
agreement," Alexander Pankin, deputy head of the Russian delegation at U.N.-led December 1-12 climate
negotiations in Poland, told Reuters. (Reuters)
There's more: Barack
Obama's envoy at UN climate talks presses China to step up emissions cuts - Incoming administration says it
will push new treaty if Beijing joins "global solution"
POZNAN, Poland — President-elect Barack Obama's administration is prepared to embrace mandatory limits on
greenhouse gas emissions in the United States but will push through Congress a new international climate treaty
only if China and other big emitters join in a "global solution," Sen. John Kerry warned at the latest
round of climate talks Thursday in Poland.
Kerry (D-Mass.), widely viewed as Obama's unofficial representative at the UN meeting, praised China—which
recently surpassed the United States as the world's biggest greenhouse gas producer—for taking a variety of
climate-friendly actions, including establishing auto emissions standards tougher than those in the United States
and setting ambitious goals to improve energy efficiency.
But unless China and other powerhouses in the developing world agree to quickly follow the U.S. toward large-scale
emissions cuts, "there's no way for us to get from here to there" in terms of holding climate change to
less than catastrophic levels, he said at a news conference. (Chicago Tribune)
Corus:
'We will quit EU to avoid carbon regime' - Philippe Varin, the chief executive of Corus, is threatening to
shift the steelmaker's European operations to China unless regulations governing carbon emissions are overhauled.
Mr Varin warned that politicians had to help fund new clean-energy technologies or face the prospect of Corus
quitting the UK and Europe.
Corus employs around 25,000 workers in the UK and is in negotiations with unions over pay in an effort to curb
large redundancies. (The Independent)
SOS (save our scam): University
of Copenhagen: Climate Scientists Gather in Copenhagen 10-12 March 2009 to Assist New Climate Deal -
COPENHAGEN, Denmark, Dec 11, 2008 -- As the United Nation's (UN) annual climate change summit - the Conference of
the Parties (COP14) - moves towards its closing sessions today in Poznan, it is clear that there are still
considerable differences to be handled before an agreement on how to tackle climate change can be reached at next
December's UN Climate Change Conference (COP15) in Copenhagen.
However, help is at hand for the world's policymakers and politicians. In an unprecedented move, climate
researchers from more than 70 countries will gather in March next year to deliver a much needed update on the
science of climate change at "Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges & Decisions" taking place in
Copenhagen, Denmark, 10 - 12 March 2009 (www.climatecongress.ku.dk).
The importance of the Congress' work is no better reflected than by the attendance of the IPCC Chairman and Nobel
Laureate Dr. R.K Pachauri. Dr. Pachauri will join Lord Nicholas Stern, London School of Economics; Jose Manuel
Barosso, President of the European Commission; and Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, as plenary
speakers at the Congress in Copenhagen. (BUSINESS WIRE)
Naked misanthropy: Population growth
contributes to emissions growth - BANGKOK, Thailand -- Few doubt the world's booming population
contributes to rising carbon emissions.
But as a U.N. climate conference in Poznan, Poland considers how to reduce heat-trapping, greenhouse gases, the
talk is all about setting emissions targets and funding renewable energy projects. Stabilizing population is not
even on the table.
"Population is the unmentioned elephant in the living room when it comes to climate change," said Bill
Ryerson, president and founder of the Vermont-based Population Media Center.
U.N. officials contend that pushing policies on population growth could undermine already difficult negotiations
that are fraught with finger pointing between rich and poor nations over who is to blame for global warming.
The developing world would oppose introducing population into the mix on the grounds that it would hold them
accountable for a problem they blame on the West. The Vatican along with Catholic and Muslim countries, meanwhile,
are opposed over fears population policies would increase support for abortion and birth control.
"A lot of people say population pressure is a major driving force behind the increase in emissions, and
that's absolutely true," the U.N.'s top climate official Yvo de Boer said. "But to then say 'OK, that
means that we need to have a population policy that reduces emissions,' takes you onto shaky ground morally."
(Associated Press)
Global Warming's Poor, Huddled
Masses - Barack Obama doesn't have a mandate for his global warming policies. He doesn't even have a mandate
from his most fervent supporters.
Last month, President-elect Obama promised to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 —
approximately a 16% cut — and then to cut them an additional 80% by 2050.
That's a 68% cut from today's levels and would mean trimming U.S. carbon emissions to roughly where they were in
1905.
Think about 1905 for a minute. There were just 77,988 registered vehicles in the U.S., compared to over 250
million today — or just one vehicle for every 3,200 now. Less than 10% of the country had electricity, fewer
than five percent of households had electric clothes-washers, only a handful of Americans had dishwashers, and no
one had air conditioning.
Life expectancy was only 47 years, about 30 years shorter than today — although it may have seemed a whole lot
longer than that.
Reducing America's greenhouse gases to 1905 levels, even including the substantial energy efficiency gains already
made and those projected for the future, would be very costly and require a wrenching transformation of our way of
life. (David A. Ridenour, IBD)
An
Upcoming Talk By Roy Spencer “Global Warming As A Response To The Pacific Decadal Oscillation” - On
December 15, 2008 Noon-1:30pm there will be an interesting and provocative talk titled “Global Warming as a
Response to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation” by Dr. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama-Huntsville at the
Capitol Hill Club 300 First St., S.E., in Washington, D.C. Reservations are required - RSVP by calling 202/
296-9655 or email info@marshall.org (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Holland
Inundated? No Way! Guest Weblog By Hendrik Tennekes - My weblogs of 28 October and 7 November, and a incisive
two-page centerfold article by Karel Knip in the November 8 issue of NRC/ Handelsblad, Rotterdam’s counterpart
to the New York Times, finally received a clear response from KNMI, the Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute.
In a November 10 message to the director-in-chief of KNMI, I suggested that the Institute should contemplate
issuing a low-end estimate for sea-level rise, in order to balance the alarmist furor sweeping the country. This
is exactly what KNMI decided to do. In an op-ed piece in the December 11 issue of NRC/Handelsblad, Wilco Hazeleger,
a senior scientist in the global climate research group at KNMI, writes:
“In the past century the sea level has risen twenty centimeters. There is no evidence for accelerated sea-level
rise. It is my opinion that there is no need for drastic measures. It is wise to adopt a flexible, step-by-step
adaptation strategy. By all means, let us not respond precipitously.”
This opinion, of course, chimes with the statement by Professor Marcel Stive that I quoted earlier:
“Fortunately, the time rate of climate change is slow compared to the life span of the defense structures along
our coast. There is enough time for adaptation. We should monitor the situation carefully, but up to now climate
change does not cause severe problems for our coastal defense system. IPCC has given lower estimates for the
expected sea level rise in four successive reports.”
As far as I am concerned, this settles the matter. KNMI has spoken. It has spoken clearly. There is no imminent
danger of accelerated sea-level rise. (Climate Science)
On the Trail of Polar Lows - Scientists from the
GKSS Research Centre in Geesthacht have developed a mathematical method that enables a reconstruction of the
occurrence of small-scale polar storms - so-called polar lows - in the North Atlantic. This has made it possible
to determine, for the first time, the frequency of such polar lows in the past.
Subsequent statistical analysis of data generated for the last 60 years revealed no direct correlation between
global warming and the incidence of polar lows.
The results from the Institute for Coastal Research in Geesthacht have now been published in the scientific
journal Geophysical Research Letters. (Huliq News)
Even
quieter on the solar front - another “all quiet alert” issued - Solar cycle 24 still getting a slow and
very delayed start. This is the third one of these (that I know of) this past year. (Watts Up With That?)
Climate
scepticism is good - "I am not a climate sceptic," said Senator Nick Xenophon in a recent ABC
interview, and went on to explain why. He said he found the case for human-induced global warming generally
convincing, though far from certain, and believed governments should take action to reduce greenhouse emissions
because of the greater risk of doing nothing.
On most everyday understandings of the term ''scepticism'', the senator was in fact displaying a sceptical
attitude towards the issue: he denied that the evidence about global warming was certain and was prepared to
entertain doubts about the degree of probability for global warming. His refusal to be labelled a ''climate
sceptic'', however, shows how the term has become hijacked in public debate.
''Climate scepticism'' now stands for a policy stance, opposition to the case for emission reduction. It has
become detached from its normal sense of reasonable doubt about the science. The confusion is important and
reflects a dangerous misunderstanding of how far policy can be based on robust evidence.
In principle, all scientific theories are open to falsification by new evidence and therefore no science can ever
be entirely certain. In practice, however, many areas of science are sufficiently well grounded in reliable
evidence to be accepted beyond reasonable doubt. But climate science is not among them. (Canberra Times)
Making
Light Work of Climate-Change Economics - Today, I can relax a little, and simply point you to two absolutely
splendid pieces, both related to ‘global warming’.
The first piece is by Nigel Lawson ((Baron Lawson of Blaby, PC, UK Chancellor of the Exchequer from June 1983 to
October 1989), writing in The Sunday Telegraph. This is an excoriating critique of the European Union Climate
Summit in Brussels and the United Nations Climate Meeting in Poznan, Poland, and, more generally, of the dangerous
politics and economics of “the great climate change circus”, as Nigel calls it. It is a brilliant article,
both honest and devastating. I just love the concluding sentences:
“Meanwhile, welcome to the new science paradigm, in which effects precede cause. I have to confess my own
limitations. Unlike Mr Al Gore, Lord Stern, and Lord Turner, I do not know what is going to happen to the planet
in the next 100-200 years. But I do know nonsense when I see it.” (Clamour Of The Times)
Good grief! Nickelodeon
indoctrinates kids with games "battling CO2 monsters"?
Global Warming Is
Caused by Computers - In particular, a few computers at NASA's Goddard Institute seem to be having a
disproportionate effect on global warming. Anthony Watt takes a cut at an analysis I have tried myself several
times, comparing raw USHCN temperature data to the final adjusted values delivered from that data by the NASA
computers. (Climate Skeptic)
In the virtual realm: Stanford researchers predict
heat waves and crop losses in California -- Global warming will likely put enormous strain on California's
water supply and energy systems and have a devastating impact on certain crops.
Stanford researchers predict this outcome based on projections from two different emission scenarios. One assumes
a continuing moderate increase in greenhouse gas emissions until 2100; the other assumes emissions would increase
until mid-century and then start dropping off. Both of the scenarios indicate there will be more frequent heat
waves and generally rising temperatures, the only difference being just how dramatic the increases will be. (PhysOrg.com)
It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. -- Yogi Berra
Something
is rotten in Norway - 500,000 sq-km of sea ice disappears overnight - I had planned to do a post yesterday
evening about how sea ice area and extent had returned to very near normal levels. But I was tired, so I saved off
the graphs from the NANSEN arctic sea ice site.
This morning I was shocked to discover that overnight, huge amounts of sea ice simply disappeared. Fortunately I
had saved the images and a copy of the webpage last night. Here is the before and after in a blink comparator:
(Watts Up With That?)
Global Sea Ice
Trend Since 1979 - surprising - Much importance has been ascribed to tracking the change in Arctic sea ice,
but what about the global trend? That doesn’t seem to get much press. However there is some important
information that needs to be presented related to the global trend of sea ice as measured by satellite since 1979.
The results are surprising. - Anthony (Watts Up With That?)
Eye-roller du jour: "Things Happen Much
Faster in the Arctic" - QUEBEC CITY, Canada, Dec 13 - In just a few summers from now, the Arctic Ocean
will lose its protective cover of ice for the first time in a million years, according to some experts attending
the International Arctic Change conference here.
A summer ice-free Arctic wasn't due for another 50 to 70 years under the worst-case climate change scenarios
examined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
"Things are happening much faster in the Arctic. I think it will be summer ice-free by 2015," said David
Barber, an Arctic climatologist at the University of Manitoba.
Such a "dramatic and serious loss of sea ice will affect everyone on the planet," Barber told IPS. (IPS)
II: Arctic Is the Canary in the Coalmine -
QUEBEC CITY, Canada, Dec 12 - Nearly 1,000 scientists and representatives of indigenous peoples from 16 countries
have braved a major winter storm to share their findings and concerns about the rapidly warming Arctic region at
the International Arctic Change conference in Quebec City.
The Arctic is "ground zero" for climate change, with temperatures rising far faster than anywhere else
on the planet. Some predict an ice-free summer Arctic in less than five to 10 years -- the first time the Arctic
Ocean will be exposed to the sun in many hundreds of thousands of years. (IPS)
A day or two earlier: Oscillation Rules as
the Pacific Cools - PASADENA, Calif. -- The latest image of sea-surface height measurements from the
U.S./French Jason-1 oceanography satellite shows the Pacific Ocean remains locked in a strong, cool phase of the
Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a large, long-lived pattern of climate variability in the Pacific associated with a
general cooling of Pacific waters. The image also confirms that El Niño and La Niña remain absent from the
tropical Pacific. (NASA JPL)
Meanwhile: Look
to patterns to grasp glacier growth - Alaska's glaciers grew this year after shrinking for most of the last
200 years. The reason? Global temperatures dropped over the past 18 months.
The global mean annual temperature has been declining recently because the solar wind thrown out by the sun has
retreated to its smallest extent in at least 50 years. This temperature downturn was not predicted by the global
computer models, but had been predicted by the sunspot index since 2000.
The solar wind normally protects the Earth from 90 percent of the high-energy cosmic rays that flash constantly
through the universe. Henrik Svensmark at the Danish Space Research Institute has demonstrated that when more
cosmic rays hit the Earth, they create more of the low, wet clouds that deflect heat back into outer space. Thus
the Earth's recent cooling. (Dennis T. Avery, Journal Star)
Seth Boringtheme: Obama
left with little time to curb global warming - WASHINGTON - When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global
warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Now it is a ticking time bomb that
President-elect Barack Obama can't avoid. (AP)
AP:
'Global Warming Is Accelerating. Time Is Close to Running Out' - Despite the nation experiencing its tenth
straight year of temperatures cooler than 1998's peak, and much of New England experiencing its worst ice storm in
decades (video embedded right), the Associated Press on Sunday published one of the most hysterical articles
concerning global warming I've ever seen.
In writer Seth Borenstein's view, climate change is "a ticking time bomb that President-elect Barack Obama
can't avoid." (News Busters)
Hot air from Obama - IN
one of his first public policy statements as America's president-elect, Barack Obama focused on climate change,
and clearly stated both his priorities and the facts on which these priorities rest. Unfortunately, both are weak,
or even wrong. (Bjorn Lomborg, The Australian)
More outright lies: Climate risk insurance
the buzz in Poznan - JOHANNESBURG, 12 December 2008 (IRIN) - Climate risk insurance was the buzz at the
two-week climate change conference in Poznan, Poland, which started on 1 December.
The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), a coalition of island and low-lying coastal countries that share
similar development and environmental concerns, especially their vulnerability to the effects of climate change,
led the groups lobbying to ensure that insurance would become part of any deal on adaptation.
Members like Papua New Guinea are already feeling the impact: in 2005, 1,000 residents on its Carteret atoll had
to be evacuated as the rising sea level was slowly drowning their land. (IRIN)
The Carteret islands are sinking -- due to tectonic motion and volcanism, not gorebull warming. We
have covered this many times but the myth is alarmingly resilient.
Ralph should be embarrassed: INTERVIEW:
There’s room for optimism on climate - Climate change is caused by human activities because the greenhouse
effect amplifies the impact of the energy that is released into the environment, says Ralph Cicerone, president of
the US National Academy of Sciences. Cicerone is an atmospheric scientist whose research on climate change has
helped shape policy in the US and other countries. While attending Academia Sinica’s Academy Presidents’ Forum
in celebration of the institution’s 80th anniversary, Cicerone sat down with ‘Taipei Times’ staff reporter
Meggie Lu last Sunday to say why he is optimistic that the generations to come will solve serious environmental
problems (Taipei Times)
Alice
in Climateland - A debate over whether the science of climate change is 'settled' turned into an unsettling
exchange (Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post)
Hype Won't Solve Climate Problem
- I am far from being a climate skeptic. On the contrary, I believe the evidence of man's impact on the planet is
overwhelming. But I am increasingly ill at ease about the debate itself.
I have just finished reading another large pile of articles about the topic and listening to various speeches. And
the elements of hype and carelessness I have come across are increasing. All sorts of things are thrown together
under the banner of climate change as if it is responsible for all of the world's problems.
From a practical viewpoint, it is impossible to unravel what is caused by weather fluctuations, the lack of
economic growth or failed government policy -- to say nothing of proving the current effects of structural changes
in the climate.
For example, everyone quotes the number of "200 million climate refugees". But closer examination
reveals that migrants name drought as the least important reason for leaving their country. If at all. Even where
drought is involved, it cannot be determined with certainty that it is due to climate change, because weather
fluctuations happen all the time.
There are authors who claim that fertile land has already been lost to the rising sea level, a claim for which
there is little evidence. (Louise O. Fresco, Der Spiegel)
Just for laughs: Dangerous
Sea Level Rise Imminent Without Large Reductions of Black Carbon and Implementation of Other Fast-Action
Mitigation Strategies - POZNAN, Poland, Dec 11, 2008 -- Poznan Panel of Experts Discuss Importance of Black
Carbon, the Montreal Protocol, Biochar, and Methane as Part of Global Climate Strategy
The world is already close to passing the tipping points for abrupt climate change events, and if strong measures
aren't taken immediately the results will be catastrophic, concluded panelists during a side event at the UN
climate conference in Poznan Tuesday night. Both scientific experts and government representatives alike at the
event sponsored by the Federated States of Micronesia and Sweden, stressed the urgent need for fast-action
mitigation measures that should be implemented and expanded immediately in order to avoid devastating consequences
such as sea level rise.
Dr. Hermann Held of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research pointed out that land ice melt is being
vastly underestimated, and that non-linear abrupt climate change is not being taken into account as it should be
by the climate convention. The world is already committed to an astounding 2.4 degrees of warming, due in part to
the warming effects of black carbon -- a substance that is now considered the second-greatest contributor to
climate change after CO2 -- which are being "unmasked" by reductions of SO2, which produces a cooling
effect. (PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX)
More laughs - not a serious contention that the Clinton/Gore administration caused global warming
(gorebull warming, no the other hand...):
Hampering development at all costs: UN
poised to agree action to halt rainforest destruction - Britain leads negotiations and pledges £100m to cut
impact of deforestation
Britain is brokering the world's first agreement on curbing the enormous contribution tropical deforestation makes
to climate change, which is likely to be signed at the UN climate conference in Poznan, Poland, later today.
It will take the form of a statement of intent by countries with large tracts of rainforest, such as Brazil, and
concerned developed nations, mainly in Europe, for a joint approach to halting forest destruction.
The removal of tropical forests is responsible for about 18 per cent of all the carbon dioxide emissions causing
global warming – more than all the emissions from the world's transport sector. Huge amounts of carbon stored in
trees are released when forests are cleared, especially if the clearance involves burning. (The Independent)
Misanthropy, Hollywood style -
Remixed with an eco-twist and a slice of Gore, a new version of The Day the Earth Stood Still popularises
human-hating. (Tim Black, sp!ked)
The Oil Addiction Myth - Every day some pundit,
politician, activist, business leader, or academic claims that America’s “oil addiction” endangers U.S.
national security and, indeed, the habitability of our planet. Champions of this message now include defense
intellectuals, who have joined forces with global warming campaigners to demand new taxes or regulations on fossil
energy use. (Marlo Lewis, Cooler Heads)
The Crone is impressed: Title,
but Unclear Power, for a New Climate Czar - WASHINGTON — Much remains unknown, and perhaps undecided, about
Carol M. Browner’s new position as White House coordinator of energy and climate policy.
How much real authority will Ms. Browner wield? Will her office have the same bureaucratic clout — the ability
to knock heads together at other agencies — as the National Security Council and the National Economic Council?
Will she be able to hold her own against the two powerhouses that will lead those established councils, James L.
Jones, a retired Marine general, and Lawrence H. Summers, a former Treasury secretary? Will she outrank the
director of the White House Domestic Policy Council? Will she have office space in the West Wing? How big will her
staff be?
But this much is known. Ms. Browner’s thinking on climate change, environmental regulation, energy conservation
and new technology are very much in line with those of President-elect Barack Obama and the other members of his
environmental team. Ms. Browner, who has close ties to Mr. Obama’s transition chief, John D. Podesta, started
laying the groundwork for the handover with him back in August. (New York Times)
While people in the real world are not: Thoughts on
Obama's Energy Picks - Ms. Carol Browner's appointment to the informal White House post of global warming and
energy 'czar' would be a most unfortunate decision. The federal government doesn't need another czar. And if
President-elect Obama decides there must be one, then Carol Browner is a bad choice. She worked for Al Gore and
shares many of his wildest opinions. Although the Senate won't have a chance to vote on her appointment, someone
needs to ask her whether she agrees with Mr. Gore, for example, that all coal-fired power plants must be replaced
by renewable energy within a decade. Or whether sea levels are going to rise twenty feet in the next four decades.
(Myron Ebell, CEI)
‘When
Britain Really Had Some Oil’ - If I were asked “What has been the single biggest failure in UK politics
over the last thirty years?”, I should have to reply “The abject failure of all political parties to develop,
and to put into action, a realistic energy policy for the next thirty years.” Although rather belated, I am thus
delighted to see that a few of our more enlightened MPs have at last grasped the seriousness of the situation.
With the EU closing down our older coal plants; with the imminent demise of our older nuclear power stations; with
our lack of adequate gas storage facilities; with a rose-tinted and utopian view of ‘renewables’ blinding MPs;
and, with the economically-fatuous and ill-fated policies currently being adopted in the name of ‘global
warming’ hysteria, Britain faces a very grim future of power blackouts and massive economic disruption. (Clamour
Of The Times)
Oil Companies Voting With Their Feet
- Another day, another oil company fleeing the country. No, this isn't Ecuador, the banana republic that just
defaulted on its debt after chasing out investors. It's the United States, and what we're seeing is self-defense.
(IBD)
YPF, Pan American, Petrobras to
explore Malvinas basin - Argentina’s YPF, Brazil’s Petrobras and Pan American Energy signed several
agreements for the joint oil and gas exploration offshore in the San Jorge Gulf, the Malvinas basin and along the
South Atlantic coastline, according to a report released Wednesday in Buenos Aires. (Mercopress)
As coal comes back into
fashion, how serious are we about carbon reduction? - Peering nervously into the dark tunnel of climate change
policy, Europe’s political leaders hesitate. Gordon Brown says he can see a chink of light in the distance and
he stumbles into the gloom. Silvio Berlusconi says the British are silly and declines to follow. Angela Merkel,
the German Chancellor, says she can see the dim glow but wonders whether it might be a train.
She is right; the light at the end of the tunnel is a coal train, a diesel juggernaut pulling 100 wagons laden
with dusty, carbon-rich but very cheap fuel. Even as European Union leaders were preparing to meet in Brussels on
Thursday for talks on cutting carbon emissions, the world’s energy marketplace was rushing towards them, pistons
pumping and whistle blowing.
Can they hear it? Europe’s CO2 emissions are falling. Deutsche Bank is forecasting a 10 per cent fall in
emissions in 2009 against last year’s level. The price of coal, gas and oil is cheaper by the day and, even more
embarrassing, the price of a permit to emit a tonne of carbon has collapsed on Europe’s emissions trading
system. (The Times)
Politically
inconvenient truth about electric cars - President Nicolas Sarkozy would dearly like to end France’s
rotating presidency of the European Union on a high note by brokering this week a deal on a grand European
response to global warming and energy efficiency. The ultimate plan is to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 20 per
cent with member states at the same time drawing their future energy needs from clean renewable sources by the
same percentage amount. Under the circumstances, it is no surprise that the automobile industry has found itself
at the heart of the climate change debate.
Indeed, Mr Sarkozy’s own government commissioned months ago one of France’s leading energy experts – Jean
Syrota, the former French energy industry regulator – to draw up a report to analyse all the options for
building cleaner and more efficient mass-market cars by 2030. The 129-page report was completed in September to
coincide with the Paris motor show. But the government has continued to sit on it and seems reluctant to ever
publish it.
Yet all those who have managed to glimpse at the document agree that it makes interesting reading. It concludes
that there is not much future in the much vaunted developed of all electric-powered cars. Instead, it suggests
that the traditional combustion engine powered by petrol, diesel, ethanol or new biofuels still offers the most
realistic prospect of developing cleaner vehicles. Carbon emissions and fuel consumption could be cut by 30-40 per
cent simply by improving the performance and efficiency of traditional engines and limiting the top speed to about
170km/hr. Even that is well above the average top speed restriction in Europe, with the notable exception of
Germany. New so-called “stop and start” mechanisms can produce further 10 per cent reductions that can rise to
25-30 per cent in cities. Enhancements in car electronics as well as the development of more energy efficient
tyres, such as Michelin’s new “energy saver” technology, are also expected to help reduce consumption and
pollution. (Financial Times)
Offshore
wind farm plans in jeopardy without support - Government's target for renewable energy will not be met,
suppliers warn
Plans to build the world's biggest offshore wind farm in the Thames estuary are under threat unless the Government
boosts incentives for renewable energy investment, it is claimed.
The London Array project is not the only one in jeopardy. Without an overhaul of the rewards system, the offshore
installations vital to meeting ambitious EU environmental targets will simply not get built, energy suppliers are
warning. (The Independent)
Green
'super-grid' could let Europe harness African Sun - The trouble with most renewable energy is that you can't
put the fuel in a ship and take it to where you want the power. Unlike oil or gas or coal, you can't transport the
hot sunshine from Africa to Britain, or the North Sea wind to Italy.
But backers of a new European super-grid say the next best thing is to move the electricity across continents
using a new generation of high-voltage direct-current cables (HVDC) that leak far less electricity than
conventional alternative-current pylons (sic). (New Scientist)
Regulators a threat to
target - THE Rudd Government's renewable energy target has been put at risk by a failure of regulators to
recognise the costs of getting green power to markets, energy networks have warned.
Yesterday, Kevin Rudd announced that a $500 million renewable energy fund to spur on the development of clean
power plants would now be spent over 18months rather than six years from 2009.
But Energy Networks Australia says electricity distributors already face challenges renewing aging infrastructure
thanks to the global financial crisis, let alone building new networks to deliver clean energy sources. (The
Australian)
Costs
don’t just mean financial — EMRs and patient lives
Part One: “Separating myth and evidence about electronic medical records,” here.
The public has heard little about the systematic reviews of the evidence on electronic medical records, which have
found no significant benefit in reducing medical errors or improving quality of patient care, safety or health
outcomes. The conclusions from those reviews, cautioning that health information technology is being implemented
without sound evidence, has also had little media coverage.
The public has heard even less about the increasing numbers of investigators who have been questioning the claim
that health information technologies save lives and who have even found that HIT can increase mortality. The media
is largely silent about studies finding that EMRs can introduce entirely new types of medical errors and “many
unintended and negative consequences.” (Junkfood Science)
A surprising link
between UFOs and acupuncture - Do you remember when the National Enquirer offered a million-dollar reward for
anyone who could prove that UFOs were extraterrestrial? (Junkfood Science)
Ground
Zero Lawsuits Are to Begin in 2010 - After years of wrangling, lawyers for New York City and for the thousands
of ground zero workers suing the city have agreed to begin trials in the spring of 2010. The lawsuits claim that
workers suffered illnesses as a result of their exposure to dust at the site, and most of the first cases to be
heard will involve people with the most severe health claims. (New York Times)
Hmm... doubtless people were harmed by conditions at the site but who is culpable? Think maybe it could be
radical Islam and appeasers ranging back to Jimmy Carter?
Corporate sabotage: The
Greening of the Corporation - A new report analyzes how far advanced top companies are in addressing climate
change and adopting environmentally friendly policies (Business Week)
D'oh! Enviro Economics - Despite all their
promise, green companies are awash in red ink.
First there was the dotcom bust of the late 1990s, then came the real-estate bubble that's deflating before our
eyes. Next up: the green bubble. Alternative energy ventures have received a lot of great press, heavy investment
and lip service from politicians in the last couple of years, but many of the nascent green industry's balance
sheets are beginning to bleed red. (Newsweek)
Green Hits Red Light with Cash-Strapped Consumers -
LOS ANGELES/SAN FRANCISCO - US consumers' enthusiasm for all things clean and green is being overshadowed by their
urgent need for a different kind of green -- the one that pays the mortgage and puts food on the table.
From hybrid cars to solar panels, products that promise to reduce consumption of polluting fossil fuels are not
selling as quickly as they were before access to credit dried up and gas prices plummeted from historic highs.
(Reuters)
The Glaxo-Gates
Malaria Vaccine - Researchers have been trying for more than 70 years to develop a vaccine against the elusive
malaria parasite without notable success. Two studies conducted in East Africa suggest that they are finally
closing in on their goal.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation deserves huge credit for enabling this research to go forward when the drug
manufacturer was unwilling, on its own, to take the financial risk to try to develop a vaccine.
The new studies showed that the most advanced candidate vaccine — made by GlaxoSmithKline — cut illnesses in
infants and young children by more than half and could safely be given with other childhood vaccines that are
already routinely administered throughout Africa. The results were published in The New England Journal of
Medicine, along with an editorial that called the vaccine’s performance a “hopeful beginning” toward
prevention of the disease. (New York Times)
Rule
Eases a Mandate Under a Law on Wildlife - The Interior Department on Thursday announced a rule that has
largely freed federal agencies from their obligation to consult independent wildlife biologists before they build
dams or highways or permit construction of transmission towers, housing developments or other projects that might
harm federally protected wildlife.
The rule, quickly challenged by environmental groups, lets the Army Corps of Engineers or the Federal Highway
Administration in many cases rely on their own personnel in deciding what impact a project would have on a fish,
bird, plant, animal or insect protected under the Endangered Species Act.
In announcing the rule, Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said his main intention was to ensure that the 1972 law
was not used as a “back door” means of regulating the emission of the gases that accelerate climate change.
Without this rule, Mr. Kempthorne said, his decision last summer to list the polar bear as threatened because of
the loss of sea ice caused by the warming of the climate could be used to block projects far from the bear’s
Arctic habitat.
“The Endangered Species Act was never intended to be a back door opportunity for climate change policy,” he
said.
Legal experts said the change seemed intended to ensure that the protection of species like the polar bear would
not impede development of coal-fired power plants or other federal actions that increased emissions of
heat-trapping gases. The Endangered Species Act, a complicated law with numerous procedural requirements, has long
infuriated business interests and property rights advocates. But the law’s broad sweep, and its impact on a
range of issues like hydroelectric power and logging, has largely been supported by federal courts. (New York
Times)
The
Curse of the Were-Mouse - There is a fascinating little story in The Times today carrying a ‘Red Flag
Warning’ about the ecological dangers of introducing alien animals and plants to isolated oceanic islands. (Clamour
Of The Times)
The persistence of thuggery (Number
Watch)
Nothing new about murderous greenies: How
Eta went to war over the environment - The militant Basque separatist movement has its traditional strongholds
in urban centres such as Bilbao. But as it seeks to display its eco credentials - by sabotaging a new high-speed
rail link - a bloody battle is being fought in one of the region's most beautiful locations. A project director
has already been murdered and now his colleagues fear they may be next (The Observer)
The roots of environmentalism -
Many environmentalists seem to think that their movement is cool, new, original, and thought-provoking. They think
that their "modern" ideas were invented by their widely promoted icons. It is hard to believe that they
think so but some of them probably do. Well, the reality is very different. Similar ideas have been around for
centuries and their incorporation within the modern industrial society began roughly seven decades ago. (The
Reference Frame)
December 12, 2008
Pickens Hops Aboard Public Health Bandwagon -
Has public health replaced patriotism as the new “last refuge of scoundrels”?
T. Boone Pickens’ self-enrichment
plan to switch America into natural gas-powered cars and wind power was initially advertised as a means to
wean America off foreign oil. When the plan was announced last July, oil had spiked to $147 per barrel, and
Pickens’ TV ads blamed our oil “addiction” for a $700 billion annual “wealth
transfer” to foreigners.
But what a difference five months makes. (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
CO2 good after all? Ocean
worlds may be dying stars’ last haven for life - A new study has suggested that large and distant ocean
worlds could provide a last refuge for life around Sun-like stars, long after the heat of the stars’ red giant
phase sterilizes closer-in, Earth-like planets.
... The team argues that life on planets the size of Earth would die off before the red giant phase begins.
That’s because the planet’s cooling core would stop the volcanic activity needed to replenish atmospheric
carbon dioxide, which is gradually removed by the formation of carbon-containing rocks.
Plants would thus run out of CO2 needed for photosynthesis.
But, the cores of bigger planets, called super-Earths, would stay warm for longer, allowing CO2 to persist in
their atmospheres.
... An ocean-dominated super-Earth would be best, because it would be best able to hold onto its CO2 atmosphere,
the team added. (ANI)
Funny how everywhere not contaminated by gorebull warming nonsense still knows the biological value of
atmospheric carbon dioxide, that marvelous essential resource.
Not according to theory: Earth has warmed 0.4 C in
30 years -- Half of the globe has warmed at least one half of one degree Fahrenheit (0.3 C) in the past 30
years, while half of that -- a full quarter of the globe -- warmed at least one full degree Fahrenheit (0.6 C),
according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center
(ESSC) at The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
A map of Earth's climate changes since December 1, 1978, (when satellite sensors started tracking the
climate) doesn't show a uniform global warming. It looks more like a thermometer: Hot at the top, cold at the
bottom and varying degrees of warm in the middle.
This is a pattern of warming not forecast by any of the major global climate models.
... Virtually all of the warming found in the satellite temperature record has taken place since the onset of
the 1997-1998 El Nino. Earth's average temperature showed no detectable warming from December 1978 until the 1997
El Nino. (University of Alabama in Huntsville) [em added]
Pachauri
— The IPCC Is Impermeable to New Science - The Guardian reports a remarkable statement by Rajendra Pachauri,
head of the IPCC: What the IPCC produces is not based on two years of literature, but 30 or 40 years of
literature. We’re not dealing with short-term weather changes, we’re talking about major changes in our
climate system. I refuse to accept that a few papers are in any way going to influence the long-term projections
the IPCC has come up with. (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Rightly: Climate change 'largely
ignored' by many big firms: report - Corporate America is making progress on addressing climate change but
many company executives are "largely ignoring" the issue when it comes to making business decisions, a
report released Thursday said. (AFP)
In fact gorebull warming should be ignored by everyone.
Obama Ally Wants Delay in Cap-and-Trade - 'We Can't Kill
the Business Climate,' Says Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill (D)
One of Barack Obama's closest allies in the Senate said Tuesday that she hopes the economic downturn can induce
the incoming president to delay the centerpiece of his plan for reducing carbon emissions.
"Let me speak for me here because I think this is very dangerous," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
"I would like to keep my relationship with Barack at this point. Let me speak for me."
McCaskill said she hoped Obama would delay a plan to institute a cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions
by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
"I think a delay may be necessary," she continued. "Yes, we've got to do something. Yes, we have to
move forward. But we can't kill the business climate at the same time. I'm from a state where most of the people
who turn on the lights in the state get it from utility companies that depend on coal. And the cost of switching
all that to clean coal technology or to alternative sources is going to be borne by them -- by regular folks who
are trying to figure out how to pay their mortgages right now." (ABCNews)
EU Carbon Price To Drop Further By Year-End - LONDON - European
carbon emissions will continue to be volatile to the end of the year, with prices expected to tighten to 13 euros
or lower if industrial output figures and the economic newsflow do not improve.
Carbon prices have more than halved a two-year high this summer by falling to below 15 euros ($19.79) in November,
a level analysts previously regarded as a potential price floor.
Lower industrial output, a flood of emissions permits onto the market, strong selling to generate cash in the
financial crisis and falling oil prices have all contributed to carbon's decline. (Reuters)
Right result, wrong reasoning: Brazilians
kill off Aussie led proposal on carbon capture at Poznan climate summit - AUSTRALIAN climate negotiators
suffered a frustrating defeat yesterday when talks in Poland thwarted an attempt to inject billions of dollars
into the search for clean coal and carbon-capture technology.
Canberra and the coal industry have tried for years to have the UN-convened climate change talks extend one of the
main international funding schemes for fighting pollution to cover projects to store emissions underground.
A majority of countries supported the Australian-led proposal to extend the Clean Development Mechanism, which
would have provided new incentives for the development of such expensive technologies.
But opponents led by Brazil yesterday refused to allow a draft proposal to go to ministers in their meetings in
Poznan, Poland, over the next two days, meaning there is no hope the idea will be adopted in any wider treaty
signed in Copenhagen next year. (The Australian)
Regardless of why they did it this is definitely the right result -- we do not want such a magnificent
resource injected into the planet's crust where it has been and would again be inaccessible to the biosphere for
millions of years.
U.N. Climate Talks To Speed CO2 Offset Approval - POZNAN - Climate
negotiators meeting in Poznan, Poland on Thursday drafted measures to speed up U.N. approval of carbon offset
projects, drawing support from carbon traders.
Under Kyoto Protocol rules rich countries can lay off their greenhouse gas emissions and meet their climate
targets by funding cuts in developing nations.
But developers of emissions-cutting projects under that scheme, called the clean development mechanism (CDM),
complain that it is creaking because of excessive red tape. (Reuters)
Political timing from Science: Climate Change
Alters Ocean Chemistry -- Researchers have discovered that the ocean's chemical makeup is less stable and more
greatly affected by climate change than previously believed. The researchers report in the December 12, 2008 issue
of Science that during a time of climate change 13 million years ago the chemical makeup of the oceans changed
dramatically. The researchers warn that the chemical composition of the ocean today could be similarly affected by
climate changes now underway – with potentially far-reaching consequences for marine ecosystems. (PhysOrg.com)
He certainly plays to his audience: Soon,
we won't be able to adapt to climate: Pachauri - POZNAN (Poland): Very soon, the impacts of climate change
will exceed our capacities to adapt to them, Rajendra Kumar Pachauri, head of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), has warned.
The head of the panel that has done more than anyone else to bring the effects of climate change - lowered farm
output, more frequent and more severe droughts, floods and storms and a rise in sea level - to the forefront of
world attention said: "The impacts of climate change are now so evident. If we don't take immediate action
they will get far worse.
"And remember, poorest countries and the poorest communities in these countries are the most vulnerable to
these effects." (Economic Times) | Climate change getting worse, warns
Pachauri (Indo-Asian News Service)
At home "global warming" is an irrelevant plot by Western Imperialists to suppress third world and
particularly Indian development while, on the gorebull warming circuit, it's an urgent problem requiring vast
transfers of developed world wealth to third world countries, particularly India.
US 'willing to lead climate push' - The US is set
to lead the world towards a new climate deal, according to John Kerry - but only if other countries pledge
emission curbs too.
The former US presidential candidate said here at the UN climate conference that the aim of agreeing a new global
deal next year must remain on track.
But a deal could not work unless it covered all countries, he added. (BBC News)
Printable report now available: U.
S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
(EPW Press Blog) | Link
to Full Printable PDF Report
China's really getting the hang of extorting the West: Rich
nations plan "great escape" on climate: China - POZNAN, Poland - Some rich countries are planning a
"great escape" from promises to fight climate change as recession bites and a deadline nears to agree a
new treaty, China's climate ambassador Yu Qingtai told Reuters on Wednesday.
"The only conclusion many people like me are drawing is that some (rich) countries are preparing for the
great escape from Copenhagen," Yu said in an interview. His comments underlined concerns that U.N.-led
climate global negotiations in Poznan, Poland, are treading water as many delegates and observers question the
chance of agreeing a comprehensive treaty as planned in Copenhagen next year.
Developing countries complain that rich states, most to blame for global warming, cannot even agree a range of
emissions cuts nor specific funding to help the South to prepare for climate change, as promised under earlier
conventions. (Reuters)
Unfortunately for them economic reality is beginning to intrude.
Kevin Rudd faces Al Gore's
heat on climate - BRITISH Prime Minister Gordon Brown and former US vice-president Al Gore are urging Kevin
Rudd to publicly back a tough global climate change agreement as the Government faces growing domestic pressure
not to lead the world on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
The weekend phone calls from Mr Brown and Mr Gore, the self-proclaimed climate guru, came as a leading unionist
and the head of the nation's peak mining industry body attacked big banks, such as NAB and Westpac, for suggesting
Australia should promise deep and unilateral greenhouse emission reductions, insisting the Government should tie
any commitment to international agreements.
Australian Workers Union leader Paul Howes accused the banks of being hypocritical and dishonest on the issue,
because they stood to reap all the benefits of a new carbon market but suffer none of the pain.
And the Australian Industry Group, which represents the manufacturing sector, is urging the Rudd Government to
rethink even modest plans because of the global financial crisis - either starting its scheme as a "dry
run" until the economic situation improves, or delaying the proposed 2010 start date. (The Australian)
Most Australians would readily admit K.Rudd is a prime-time weak link as far as elected leaders go and so it
is inevitable that other leaders and key carbon scammers should attempt to coerce the fool into stupid promises
(and he makes enough of those without encouragement). Just because the dipstick-in-chief makes rash promises
doesn't mean Australia will really try to implement them though.
Coalition may delay emissions
scheme - KEVIN Rudd's ambition of an emissions trading scheme in Australia by 2010 is looking even shakier
with confirmation the Coalition may delay Senate support entirely until business is happy.
The Coalition policy had been to support emissions trading in principle but push for a delay until at least 2011.
But now the Opposition has flagged it may wait until 2012 or even longer if the global financial crisis hits hard.
The move follows the Australian Industry Group's decision to call for a delay in the 2010 start date proposed by
the Rudd Government in light of the global financial crisis.
Opposition emissions trading spokesman Andrew Robb said today it would be reckless to proceed if it would hurt the
economy. (The Australian)
As energy rationing inevitably must. Are they learning this nonsense must never proceed?
Better cut carbon dioxide
later - THE nation's commitment to addressing climate change was conceived in times of prosperity, in times of
low unemployment, high profits, budget surpluses and unquestioned economic security. It was shaped by the politics
of prosperity.
Despite the optimism, implementing national initiatives that put a price on carbon for the first time, with
considerable uncertainty over the progress towards an international agreement, was always ambitious and was aptly
described as a diabolical dilemma. (The Australian)
No Heather, there's actually no case for ever doing so.
Bankrupt advice on
emissions - THE hypocrisy of big banks such as Westpac and National Australia Bank that signed up to a
corporate communique on climate change calling for aggressive unilateral targets needs to be exposed.
Having participated in what can be described only as a global stuff-up of our financial system, they now are
trying to tell Australian corporations that operate in the real economy, and generate real wealth and real jobs,
how to behave on climate change. (The Australian)
U.N. Chief Tells World: We Need A Green New Deal - POZNAN - The
world must avoid backsliding in fighting global warming and work out a "Green New Deal" to fix its twin
climate and economic crises, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday.
"We must re-commit ourselves to the urgency of our cause," Ban told a December 1-12 meeting of 100
environment ministers in Poznan, Poland, reviewing progress toward a new U.N. climate treaty meant to be agreed at
the end of 2009.
"The financial crisis cannot be an excuse for inaction or for backsliding on your commitments," he told
ministers. The climate crisis "affects our potential prosperity and peoples' lives, both now and far into the
future." (Reuters)
U.N. chief may call climate summit in September 2009 - POZNAN -
The United Nations may call a summit of world leaders in September 2009 to try to spur negotiations on a new U.N.
climate treaty, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday. (Reuters)
New UN Treaty
May Let Some Countries Drop CO2 Limits -- United Nations negotiators may allow some developed nations to drop
their greenhouse-gas targets in a new climate-change treaty beginning in 2013.
Industrialized countries should “principally” commit to new limits on emissions blamed for global warming,
according to a draft document guiding negotiations by 37 richer nations that currently have limits under the 1997
Kyoto Protocol climate treaty. The draft was provided today to delegates at UN-sponsored treaty talks in Poznan,
Poland.
“The wording leaves open the possibility that not all countries will have targets,” Yvo de Boer, executive
secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said today in an interview. (Bloomberg)
Italy still 'not satisfied' ahead of EU climate
change summit - Negotiations have moved forward on a European plan to combat global warming but Italy is not
yet prepared to sign on, Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said Wednesday.
"There have been steps towards a balanced compromise, but Italy is not satisfied," Frattini said in
remarks quoted by the ANSA news agency the day before EU leaders were set to debate the plan in Brussels.
Andrea Ronchi, the minister for European affairs, said for his part that "conditions are not right to say we
have reached agreement" at the European Union level.
"We still have concerns over the protection of the manufacturing sector," he said, pointing in
particular to the ceramic, glass and paper industries. (EUbusiness)
Comments On UK
Met Office Press Releases On Climate - There was an interesting news article in the Guardian on December 6
2008 by James Randerson titled Explainer: Coolest year since 2000 (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Understatement of the day: Climate
change not imminent danger, UN panel chief says - There is no clear evidence that global warming is an
imminent danger to the world, says Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Even so, it would be good for governments to go further with proposed cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions to deal
with dire predictions made in a 2007 panel report, he told the Associated Press in an interview on Tuesday. (CBC
News)
No clear evidence? Try no evidence whatsoever - zip, zilch, none, nada, not a thing, absolute dearth... We
have no evidence carbon dioxide emissions from any and all sources do other than help feed the biosphere as a
resource essential for photosynthesis.
The U.N.'s Global Warming Muzzle
- When the United Nations insists that man-made global warming is now proved beyond doubt, it's practicing one of
the few things it has proved itself good at: censorship of dissenting viewpoints.
The wasteful, corrupt, dictatorship-dominated U.N. may not be successful in fulfilling very many of its supposed
objectives — world peace, the end of poverty, mutual understanding, etc. — but when it comes to suppressing
contrarian points of view that interfere with official U.N. stances, the organization ranks with the best. (IBD)
“Wilder and wetter
everywhere” - The scare: The Guardian, one of the two UK newspapers most prone to write unverified and
scientifically-inaccurate stories about the consequences of “global warming”, published an article on 10
December 2008, intended to influence delegates at the UN’s Poznan conference on the climate. The article listed
a series of alleged climate catastrophes all round the world, saying that “millions … are feeling the force of
a changing climate. … (Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
Paleostorms of
Southern France - The United Nations Climate Change Conference is well-underway in Europe and environmental
groups are lobbying to reinforce every pillar of the greenhouse gas – global warming story. According to their
reports, any severe storm any place on the planet can now blamed on global warming. Thunderstorms, tornadoes,
hurricanes, winter storms – it just doesn’t matter … they are all caused by global warming and any deaths or
damages from these storms is directly related to the consumption of fossil fuels, particularly that obscene
consumption in the United States. Of course, they always insist that the debate on any of these subjects is over,
and it is now time for action. Even U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the conference participants, “The
economic crisis is serious; yet when it comes to climate change, the stakes are far higher…The climate crisis
affects our potential prosperity and our people’s lives, both now and far into the future…we must recommit
ourselves to the urgency of our cause.” Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!
Well, before you get carried away and win a Nobel Peace Prize, be alert that we have covered this nonsense many
times in the past at World Climate Report, and the scientific literature on the subject continues to provide a
stream of evidence countering the claims of the global warming advocates. As we have seen many times before, the
claims of increasing storm intensity or frequency are generally inconsistent with the conclusions of the United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and certainly at odds with dozens of articles published
each year in the professional scientific literature. (WCR)
“Companies
could be sued over climate change” - The scare: In early December 2008, The Guardian, a newspaper of the
British Left and an unquestioning true-believer in the catastrophist version of climate alarm, quoted Professor
Myles Allen, a physicist at Oxford University, as saying computer models such as one that he has developed can now
ascribe individual extreme-weather events to anthropogenic “global warming”, allowing environmental pressure
groups to sue the corporations they believe are to blame for the catastrophic heating of the planet. Professor
Allen joked, “We are starting to get to the point that when an adverse weather event occurs we can quantify how
much more likely it was made by human activity.” He said his team had used a “new technique” of comparing
two models – one including and one excluding anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions – to identify the impact
of manmade “global warming” and, for instance, to work out whether “global warming” worsened the UK floods
in 2007, which inundated 10,000 properties and forced the evacuation of 11,000 people from their homes. He added
that people affected by floods could “potentially” use the findings to begin legal action. He said, “It’s
just a question of computing power. We can work out whether climate change has loaded the dice and made extreme
weather more likely. And once the risk is doubled, then lawyers get interested.” (Christopher Monkton, SPPI)
Editorial: Time for candor on climate plan -
Ever since he signed California's 2006 law to reduce emissions linked to global warming, Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger has made the transition sound startlingly easy.
A 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020? No problem. Bring on the hydrogen-powered Hummers, the
geothermal-powered Jacuzzis and the solar-powered plasma televisions.
There is no need for sacrifice or higher energy prices in Schwarzenegger's vision of a low-carbon future.
"It's all about technology, because we all know that the guilt trip that we have put on people has not
worked, to tell them that they should not use the Jacuzzi, or the big, large plasma TV," the governor said in
a speech last month.
Sadly, this overly optimistic view of the world has crept into the "scoping plan" that the California
Air Resources Board is expected to vote on today to implement the state's global warming law. (Sacramento Bee)
Greens Against Growth -
Under normal circumstances, November 2008 might have been remembered as a key moment in the American
climate-change policy debate. Two independent evaluations were made public that analyzed California's
groundbreaking, path-setting 2006 law dictating a sharp state increase in the use of cleaner, costlier energy --
specifically Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's repeated assertions that not only would the law not be a drag on the
economy; it would actually make the state's economy healthier. Similar claims are common in Washington and many
state capitals, which are all considering California-style regulations.
Both evaluations were highly dismissive of the notion that the California plan would help the economy. The
nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office -- the most respected voice in Sacramento -- concluded (pdf) that the
California Air Resources Board's claims of economic gains were simply not sustained by the "scoping
plan" it released outlining the implementation of the 2006 law. Instead, the plan ignored likely negative
effects and cherry-picked data to produce a forecast of long-term economic benefits. Most tellingly, the LAO noted
that the "ARB deemed all measures included in the plan 'cost effective' simply because they reduce GHG
[greenhouse gas] emissions, whatever the cost." By this logic, a business shutting down would be "cost
effective."
But the most damning criticism came from the economists hired to do a "peer review" (pdf) of the ARB.
Most were stunned by the shoddiness of the ARB's analysis. (Chris Reed, American Spectator)
Angela Merkel turns her back on
green dream of EU - Angela Merkel was once the Green Goddess who pushed through tough climate change targets
to show that Europe could lead the world in beating global warming.
Under huge pressure to shield German industry from the cost of going green, however, she has been transformed into
Frau Nein — fighting to reverse key goals that she once championed. (The Times)
Why Merkel's Climate About-Face Is
Bad for Business - The economy or the environment? That is the choice as Angela Merkel sees it -- and she has
chosen the former. But the dichotomy is no longer valid, and Merkel's choice is a grave mistake. These days, one
can have both the economy and the environment. (Christian Schwägerl, Der Spiegel)
Not only can you have environment as well as economy but you must have a booming economy to
support environmentalism (the reverse, however, does not hold and a dud economy makes environmentalism totally
unaffordable).
EU
lead on climate change under threat - The European Union's global leadership on climate change is under threat
as Germany heads a rebellion to protect industry from the extra cost of tough environmental targets. (Daily
Telegraph)
A Bad Climate Trade-off -
Protectionism hinders the fight against global warming.
The high priests of climate change are wrapping up their latest meeting today in Poznan, Poland, where the United
Nations is hosting a conference on global warming. But don't expect a real solution to emerge. While most of these
politicians and negotiators concur global warming is a man-made problem, there is still fierce opposition to the
quickest method for spreading man-made solutions: free trade.
Numerous technologies already are on the market or in development that can increase energy efficiency or directly
reduce the volume of global emissions. Solar panels provide an alternative source of power generation for
countries currently dependent on carbon-dioxide-emitting energy such as coal. Clean coal technologies can
significantly reduce pollution from existing coal-fired power stations. Fluorescent lamps can increase energy
efficiency over traditional lighting systems.
But trade protectionism inhibits the international spread of these and other technologies, especially to
high-polluting developing countries. Low-carbon technologies are classed as "manufacture" and are
treated as an industrial good on each country's tariff schedules. Developing countries have high tariffs on
industrial goods as a form of industry protection. A 2007 World Bank study found that of four major low-carbon
technologies -- clean coal, wind, solar and fluorescent lamps -- tariff and nontariff barriers can be as high as
160% among the top 15 greenhouse-gas-emitting developing countries. Such products also face stiff nontariff
barriers like quotas and import ceilings.
Even worse, many developing countries are now calling for compulsory licensing of patents on low-carbon
technologies to reduce their cost. Under this regime, governments ignore patents on these technologies and allow
for local production or importation of knock-offs. At last year's United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change Meeting in Bali, Nigerian Environment Minister Halima Tayo Alao argued that patents are a
"barrier" to transferring low-carbon technologies to developing countries. (Tim Wilson, Wall Street
Journal Asia)
More about 'Gibbering George' Moonbat: The
Completely Cuckoo Climate Change Cyberspace Conspiracy Conspiracy - How long has it been since we last
mentioned George Monbiot? The truth is that we simply got bored of his predictable column in the Guardian.
Furthermore, we aren’t convinced that anyone actually takes him at all seriously, apart from the people who book
him for media appearances. After all, his earnestness excites the vapid newswaves with the prospect of the end of
the world. And there’s nothing more exciting than the end of the world, especially when the rest of the news is
so mundane. But this week, George has surprised us. (Climate Resistance)
Obama’s Energy
Plan May Hinge on Scientist, Washington Veteran -- Barack Obama’s choice of a Clinton administration veteran
to head a new White House energy office and a Nobel Prize-winning physicist as energy secretary will redefine the
way policy is made and applied in the U.S.
Whether it also helps advance the president-elect’s agenda of boosting the economy and reducing pollution may
depend on how well the two individuals get along. Carol Browner, 52, will head the national energy council, and
Steven Chu, 60, will be Obama’s energy secretary, a person close to the transition said.
“If the chemistry is right between Carol Browner and Steve Chu then you can take what otherwise might be some
creative tension and turn it into a positive,” said Dan Arvizu, director of the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado. “If they are not in alignment philosophically in terms of what they think ought
to be done, then you’ve got an issue.” (Bloomberg)
Obama
Team Set on Environment - WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama has selected his top energy and
environmental advisers, including a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and the former head of the Environmental
Protection Agency, presidential transition officials said Wednesday.
Collectively, they will have the task of carrying out Mr. Obama’s stated intent to curb global warming emissions
drastically while fashioning a more efficient national energy system. And they will be able to work with strong
allies in Congress who are interested in developing climate-change legislation, despite fierce economic headwinds
that will amplify objections from manufacturers and energy producers. (New York Times)
Obama's Awful Energy Picks - President-elect Barack Obama
made centrist choices for cabinet positions that deal with economics and national security, but yesterday he went
off the deep end with his energy picks. (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Browner and Greener
- Needless to say, the nation’s energy crisis is no longer Barack Obama’s top priority.
During the October 7 debate at Nashville’s Belmont University, after a summer in which gasoline prices topped $4
per gallon, Senator Barack Obama declared that the highest priority facing the next president was the nation’s
energy crisis.
It is curious, then, that it has taken so long for President-Elect Obama to unveil his top energy officials. The
selections he is expected to announce shortly come after Obama has tapped not only his economic and
foreign-affairs advisers, but his nominees to head the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Commerce, and Health and
Human Services. Apparently, $1.50-per-gallon gas makes the nation’s energy crisis a middling concern. But unless
Obama’s plan is to cultivate a recession four years in length, at some point the nation’s long-term energy
challenges will return to the front burner. Unfortunately, Obama’s picks reveal a mindset dedicated largely to
combating climate change, with little emphasis on securing the energy supplies our 21st-century economy will
require. (Max Schulz, NRO)
"New" Ethanol To Face Crunch Time Under A Chu DOE - NEW
YORK - The next U.S. energy secretary, a long-standing champion of producing ethanol from non-food crops rather
than corn, could face hurdles in moving the next-generation biofuel from the laboratory to the gasoline station.
Steven Chu, Obama's pick for the head of the Department of Energy, is a steadfast supporter of next-generation
biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol, expected to be made from the tough woody bits of crops like grasses and fast
growing trees as well as plant and timber waste.
A 2007 report co-chaired by Chu, and commissioned by the governments of China and Brazil, called for
"intensive research" into production of cellulosic, which relies on technology like isolating microbes,
or using large amounts of heat and steam, to break down the tough bits into fuel.
Chu, the head of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a Nobel physics laureate, also helped organize the
Energy Biosciences Institute, a lab focusing on next-generation biofuels funded with $500 million from oil major
BP Plc.
He has been a staunch opponent of the current U.S. corn-based ethanol system, which was widely blamed for spiking
food and grain prices this summer, calling it "not the right crop for biofuels," at a conference this
spring in the country's agriculture heartland. (Reuters)
It’s a Gas, Gas, Gas: The Paradigm Shift in the
U.S. Natural Gas Business - The collapse in oil prices gets most of the headlines. But the corresponding
collapse in natural gas prices may be the more important story for both the short- and long-term interests of the
U.S.
On July 1, natural gas futures peaked at $13.51. On July 14, crude oil futures peaked at $145.16 per barrel.
Today, the spot price for natural gas is about $5.67 and the spot price for oil is about $46. And those prices may
go lower still. On November 24, Jen Snynder, the head of North American gas research for the energy consulting
firm Wood Mackenzie, released a report which she claimed that the U.S. gas market should expect to see natural gas
prices “in the range of $5 to $6” for the next five years. (Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
The good, the bad and the ugly (Number Watch)
What are you
willing to reveal in a text message? - Text messaging has become so ubiquitous and we’ve become so
comfortable with it, it can be easily to forget to consider how the information we share might be used. Like any
technology, it can bring life-saving benefits as well as risks.
Today, there have been a rash of stories across the country — from Minnesota, Florida to Texas — of text
message phishing scams, trying to get people to reveal personal information about themselves. No financial
institution would send a text message asking for information and the Better Business Bureau advises never provide
personal or financial information to anyone who contacts you. [Follow the hyperlinks for more information on these
financial scams.]
Receiving a text message asking for your credit card information may be a no brainer for some who wouldn’t think
of replying, but what if you receive a text message asking about your lifestyle habits, if you smoke, drink or
what you weigh? Would it be as clear how revealing that information might be used in ways that might negatively
affect you? (Junkfood Science)
Brazil Allows Planting Of Dupont, Dow GMO Corn - SAO PAULO -
Brazil's biosafety regulator CTNBio approved on Thursday the commercial planting of a genetically modified corn
jointly developed by Dupont Inc. and Dow Chemical Co..
The Herculex corn variety is insect resistant and tolerant to glufosinate ammonium.
It must still be approved by Brazil's Agriculture Ministry before it can be planted.
This is the sixth genetically modified variety of corn approved for commercial planting in Brazil.
The first ones, developed by Bayer and Monsanto, were cleared in late 2007. So the next corn season will be the
first one to produce genetically modified types.
They are expected to account for 6.7 percent of the total planted area, according to independent grain analyst
Celeres in their first season. (Reuters)
December 11, 2008
This absurd claim, again: Global
warming may kill coral reefs within 40 years - POZNAN, Poland -- The world has lost nearly one-fifth of its
coral reefs and much of the rest could be destroyed by increasingly acidic seas if climate change continues
unchecked, an environmental group warned Wednesday.
Global warming and the rising temperature of the oceans are the latest and most serious threats to coral, already
damaged by destructive fishing methods and pollution, the International Union for Conservation of Nature said.
(Canadian Press)
Reef builders evolved when Earth was warmer and when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were far higher than
any anticipated. They built reefs when there were no ice caps and sea levels were higher, now stranded inland,
far above sea level and they built reefs even during ice ages, now lifeless in the cold, dark depths. Far from
fragile, static and endangered corals are opportunistic occupiers of every suitable niche colonizing any
suitable structure from rock to oil rig. In fact Greenpeace caused the destruction
of rare North Sea corals through their idiotic Brent Spar campaign.
Warning
sounded for last Metro glacier - COQUITLAM - Metro Vancouver's last remaining glacier -- a 20-hectare mass of
ice in the Coquitlam watershed -- could be wiped out within 100 years due to global warming, according to a
geoscientist for the region.
Although the loss isn't expected to have a huge effect on the region's water supply, the threat of its
disappearance has prompted Metro Vancouver to look at ways to conserve and store water for future generations.
Geoscientist Dave Dunkley, who has visited the Coquitlam site three times, said the glacier is shrinking and
speculates it has retreated about 720 metres from the alpine valley floor.
"If we keep going down the climate-change path we're on, we may not see this glacier by the end of the
century," said Dunkley, a geoscientist with Metro Vancouver. (Vancouver Sun)
About 50 acres of ice is expected to last 100 years? Not much of a thaw, eh?
UN
Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims - Study: Half of
warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History'
POZNAN, Poland - The UN global warming conference currently underway in Poland is about to face a serious
challenge from over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe who are criticizing the climate claims made by
the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. Set for release this week, a newly updated U.S. Senate Minority
Report features the dissenting voices of over 650 international scientists, many current and former UN IPCC
scientists, who have now turned against the UN. The report has added about 250 scientists (and growing) in 2008 to
the over 400 scientists who spoke out in 2007. The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the
number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.
The U.S. Senate report is the latest evidence of the growing groundswell of scientific opposition rising to
challenge the UN and Gore. Scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical
scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic
Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices and views of scientists skeptical of
man-made global warming fears. [See Full report Here: & See: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3
of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' ]
Full Senate Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned… (EPW Press Blog)
Eichler et al.: Half of
recent warming was solar - In this dose of peer-reviewed skeptical climatological literature, we follow
Climate Research News. The blog was intrigued by a new article in Geophysical Research Letters that was accepted
on Friday, December 5th. (The Reference Frame)
Setting
climate change targets will not save the world, warns Bjorn Lomborg - Setting new targets on reducing carbon
emissions will do nothing to save the world from global warming, a leading environmentalist has warned as
ministers meet at a landmark climate change conference. (The Telegraph)
Banking
on global warming - Australian Workers Union boss Paul Howes outs some particularly offensive green
hypocrites: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
Greenwash: Are
carbon offsetters ripping you off? - The cost of offsetting your carbon emissions produced when you fly varies
wildly. Fred Pearce asks: genuine error or a convenient con-trick? (The Guardian)
Time for shoot-on-sight orders: No
new coal - the calling card of the 'green Banksy' who breached fortress Kingsnorth - The £12m defences of the
most heavily guarded power station in Britain have been breached by a single person who, under the eyes of CCTV
cameras, climbed two three-metre (10ft) razor-wired, electrified security fences, walked into the station and
crashed a giant 500MW turbine before leaving a calling card reading "no new coal". He walked out the
same way and hopped back over the fence.
All power from the coal and oil-powered Kingsnorth station in Kent was halted for four hours, in which time it is
thought the mystery saboteur's actions reduced UK climate change emissions by 2%. Enough electricity to power a
city the size of Bristol was lost.
Yesterday the hunt was on for the man dubbed "climate man" or the "green Banksy". Climate
activists responsible for hijacking coal trains and breaking on to runways said they knew nothing about the
incident. (The Guardian)
Uh-oh... Obama meets Gore, lauds ideas on
energy, economy - CHICAGO — President-elect Barack Obama on Tuesday praised former Vice President Al Gore's
ideas on the environment as one way to help the nation's struggling economy.
Obama, Gore and Vice President-elect Joe Biden met privately at Obama's transition headquarters in Chicago for
almost two hours. Obama said they discussed so-called green jobs as a way to boost employment, reduce energy costs
and improve national security by reducing reliance on foreign oil.
Obama said global warming is "not only a problem, but it's also an opportunity."
"We all believe what the scientists have been telling us for years now, that this is a matter of urgency and
national security, and it has to be dealt with in a serious way," Obama said at the end of the closed-door
meeting. (Associated Press)
Major uh-oh... Officials
say Obama chooses energy, EPA posts - WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama intends to round out his
environmental and natural resources team with a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and three former Environmental
Protection Agency officials from the Clinton administration.
The president-elect has selected Steven Chu for energy secretary, Lisa Jackson for EPA administrator, Carol
Browner as his energy "czar" and Nancy Sutley to lead the White House Council on Environmental Quality,
Democratic officials said Wednesday. (Associated Press)
Europe Puts Hurdles in Obama's
Climate Path - Just as the US gets a new president who promises to reverse years of climate change neglect,
American environmental experts worry that Europe's resolve on climate change is weakening. Merkel's recent
about-face is especially alarming. (Der Spiegel)
The 'Green Jobs' Myth: European workers
aren't believers - The United Nations is huddling in Poznan, Poland, this week to negotiate a successor to the
Kyoto Protocol, but the real news is that part of the global "consensus" on climate change seems to be
unraveling. To wit, the myth of "green jobs."
In Brussels last week, some 11,000 metal workers clogged the EU quarter to protest global-warming policies. They
worry that their industry could be harmed and their jobs forced overseas; some of them carried coffins as props.
Most of the marching workers were from Germany, where auto makers are also still fuming over new emissions
standards. Audi and BMW and other carbon-using industries have argued both for shallower emissions cuts and a
longer phase-in period.
Meanwhile, Poland is threatening to veto a new EU climate-change accord unless restrictions on its coal use are
eased. And Italy's government complains that new green policies could cost its industry up to €20 billion a year
over the next decade. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger appeared at Poznan by video, asserting that green
measures "will also revive our economies."
But not everyone is buying it. As Stefania Prestigiacomo, Italy's environment minister, has noted, "Some
people claim environmental measures are a way to relaunch industry, but we have to be realistic. Resources are
limited, and they will be even more so because of the economic crisis."
This is certainly a new tune for the Europeans, who have lectured Americans for more than a decade to sign Kyoto
because the planet is in peril. Their happy talk of a painless 20% reduction in emissions by 2020 has been mugged
by reality. Carbon emission regulations come at a high price in lost jobs and lost competitiveness.
No wonder, then, that the Europeans are delighted over the pledges by the incoming Obama Administration and
Democrats in Congress to adopt similar legislation to tax U.S. industries. (Wall Street Journal Europe)
Redistributing more of your, uh, wealth: UN
talks split on aid to help poor cope with warming - POZNAN, Poland, Dec 10 - U.N. climate negotiators tried on
Wednesday to break the deadlock over controlling planned payouts from a new fund to help poor nations adapt to
floods, droughts and rising seas.
The 189-nation talks split between rich and poor countries over the Adaptation Fund -- due to start in 2009 --
which could grow to about $300 million a year by 2012 to help developing nations cope with global warming.
(Reuters)
EU Commitment to the Environment Put
to the Test - European Union leaders are to gather in Brussels on Thursday for a crucial summit and one of the
most important issues will be climate change. However, with Germany, Poland and Italy all calling for concessions,
will the deal end up as a toothless compromise? (Der Spiegel)
Angela Merkel turns her back on
green dream of EU - Angela Merkel was once the Green Goddess who pushed through tough climate change targets
to show that Europe could lead the world in beating global warming.
Under huge pressure to shield German industry from the cost of going green, however, she has been transformed into
Frau Nein — fighting to reverse key goals that she once championed.
As EU leaders meet to complete the targets today the German Chancellor, who was so firmly in Europe's driving seat
just a year ago, also seems off-message over the other main item on the agenda: the size of the recovery plan
needed to beat the recession.
Berlin is being accused of resorting to national self-interest just when Europe needs to pull together. Moreover,
the importance of Europe sticking to its ambitious target of cutting CO2 by 20 per cent by 2020 has never been
greater, with the chance of liaising with a sympathetic new US president to push for a global successor to the
Kyoto Protocol fast approaching. (The Times)
Climate
change: A battle for the planet - The Polish city of Poznan, host of this week's vital climate change summit,
may become known as the place where the Earth was saved – or doomed
Summing up what many scientists, environmentalists and politicians now think about the threat of climate change is
simple: the world is drinking in the last chance saloon. (The Independent)
"Drinking in the last chance saloon"? Swilling Kool-Aid, more like.
How to Save the Climate from the
Recession - Yvo de Boer, the UN's climate chief, is facing an uphill task at Poznan. The world needs a new
treaty on global warming to replace the Kyoto Protocol but many nations are now far more worried about the
economic crisis. The prospects of reaching a deal by next year in Copenhagen are already looking slim. (Der
Spiegel)
:) Hopes for Poznan climate
change progress melting away - As climate change negotiators headed back into the Poznan International Fair
after a two-day break, there was a frosty atmosphere inside and out.
Delegates at the Dec. 1-12 U.N. climate change talks say recession and the change of U.S. administration make it
unlikely the world will meet a deadline for agreeing a full new pact to fight global warming in Copenhagen at the
end of 2009.
Developing nations are fed up with what they see as a lack of progress at the conference in western Poland, with
some of the poorest fearing their calls for urgent help to adapt to a warmer world are being sidelined.
Activists from both rich and poor countries shivered outside in freezing temperatures on Tuesday to cajole
negotiators into doing more. (Reuters)
Before
Summit, E.U. Debates Limits on Carbon Emissions - Nations Weigh Economic, Climate Risks
POZNAN, Poland, Dec. 10 -- With delegates from around the world struggling to make progress here toward a new
agreement on combating global warming, the European Union is locked in its own contentious debate over whether to
toughen limits on carbon emissions, even though much of the continent has fallen behind on meeting current
targets.
The Europeans' disagreements over how fast to cut emissions in order to avert dangerous climate change, which
could culminate in a vote as soon as Thursday in Brussels, highlights the difficulties the industrialized world
faces as it decides how aggressively it can afford to act, especially amid a severe economic downturn.
The outcome in Europe could have major implications for the U.S. Congress, which is poised to enact limits on
greenhouse gas emissions after President-elect Barack Obama takes office. (Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post)
Dumber by the day: Europe
pledges strict emissions cut to tempt China and India into climate deal - European climate chiefs to pledge
85-90% emissions cut by 2050 in exchange for 15-30% reduction by developing countries
European officials have offered to make the continent virtually zero-carbon in an attempt to lure China and other
developing countries into a new global climate deal to replace the Kyoto protocol.
Stavros Dimas, European commissioner for the environment, told the Guardian that the EU could aim for a 80-95%
reduction in greenhouse gas pollution by 2050 in exchange for greater efforts by developing nations to limit their
emissions.
Dimas said the pledge has "already been put on the table" and that he was awaiting responses. In return,
Europe would ask developing countries to reduce their forecasted carbon pollution growth by 15-30% over the next
decade. "We haven't got any reaction, so they're floating somewhere," he said. (The Guardian)
Italy
defies EU summit deal on climate change - Despite "significant steps" taken to soften the impact of
the EU's climate change goals on its industry, Italy yesterday (8 December) continued to maintain a tough
negotiating line ahead of a decisive EU summit on 11-12 December. (EurActiv)
U.N. Climate Talks May Decide On Carbon Capture -
POZNAN - U.N. climate talks in Poland may still release funds to curb carbon emissions from coal plants in the
developing world, the U.N.'s top climate official said on Wednesday.
Earlier on Wednesday, the track of U.N. talks which vets scientific approaches for curbing greenhouse gases failed
to reach any conclusion on approving the technology, called carbon capture and storage (CCS).
That technology is untested on a commercial scale, and involves trapping and then burying underground the carbon
dioxide which power plants produce as a result of burning fossil fuels. (Reuters)
Criminal waste of both the energy to do so and the loss to the biosphere of the carbon resource. Must not be
done.
EU carbon trading system brings windfalls for
some, with little benefit to climate - BRUSSELS: The European Union started with the most high-minded of
ecological goals: to create a market that would encourage companies to reduce greenhouse gases by making them pay
for each ton emitted into the atmosphere.
Four years later, the carbon trading system has created a multibillion-euro windfall for some of the continent's
biggest polluters, with little or no noticeable benefit to the environment so far.
The lessons learned are coming under fresh scrutiny now, both in Europe and abroad. EU leaders will meet Thursday
and Friday to work on the next phase of their system, seeking, they say, both to extend its scope and correct its
flaws. And in the United States, President-elect Barack Obama has pledged to move quickly on a similar program.
(James Kanter, IHT)
'Groundhog day'
at climate talks - AUSTRALIAN diplomats have been accused of helping turn UN climate talks in Poland into
"groundhog day" by failing to support a proposal that rich countries look to the advice of climate
scientists when setting greenhouse targets.
It is believed that Australia has joined Japan, Canada and Russia in wanting changes to a proposed agreement that
says greenhouse cuts should be "informed" by advice that the developed world needs to cut emissions by
25-40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020.
The disputed draft text is largely similar to a document that was supported by all four countries at a summit in
Bali a year ago.
Backing the document would not bind Australia to a cut of 25-40 per cent — the range put forward by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as giving the world a chance of limiting global warming to about 2
degrees. (The Age)
Oh... 2008 One Of The Worst Years For Disaster
Losses: Insurer - POZNAN - Weather-related disasters and earthquakes are likely to make 2008 the second most
costly year for insurers after 2005, when Hurricane Katrina struck the United States, a leading insurer said on
Wednesday. (Reuters)
... how many times must this undead claim rise? We have exactly zero evidence of increasing extreme weather
events but know with certainty that we are placing more vulnerable assets in harms way (coasts and valley
floors, where storm/flood damage is to be anticipated). More assets are getting clobbered? Go figure! Oh, and
get used to it because there is some indication we are returning to more storm-prone phases of various cycles
associated with cooler conditions.
Oscillation Rules as the Pacific Cools -
PASADENA, Calif. -- The latest image of sea-surface height measurements from the U.S./French Jason-1 oceanography
satellite shows the Pacific Ocean remains locked in a strong, cool phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a
large, long-lived pattern of climate variability in the Pacific associated with a general cooling of Pacific
waters. The image also confirms that El Niño and La Niña remain absent from the tropical Pacific. (NASA JPL)
Greenpeace scare-bear Bill Hare cranks up the rhetoric: Bye,
bye Arctic ice - a case of too little too late - The world is struggling to keep global warming to two degrees
celsius as governments cannot agree on the steps. Even if they agree, it will be too little too late to save the
Arctic ice cap and the sea will rise 6-7 metres, says a senior expert of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC).Bill Hare from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany was the coordinator for
the section on sea level rise for the benchmark 2007 Assessment Report 4 (AR4) of the IPCC. He now says it is
'likely that IPCC AR4 sea level rise projections are biased low'.
New research carried out since AR4 shows that the 'risk of additional sea level rise from both the Greenland and
Antarctic ice sheets may be larger than projected and could occur on century time scales'. (Indo-Asian News
Service)
Opposites attract on a
burning issue - MARVIN Geller and Richard Lindzen are good friends. For those in the climate-change know, this
may come as a surprise. After all Geller, an atmospheric scientist at Stony Brook University in New York State,
and Lindzen, also an atmospheric scientist, with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, are on
opposite sides of the climate-change debate. Geller argues that evidence suggests global warming is real and
humans are the likely culprit. Lindzen says it ain't so. (The Australian)
Comments
On The NASA GISS Website Q&A “GISS Surface Temperature Analysis - The Elusive Absolute Surface Air
Temperature (SAT)” - Thanks to Vincent Gray of New Zealand for alerting us to a set of questions and answers
on the NASA GISS website, with respect to the measurement of surface air temperatures (SAT) in regards to long
term climate change.
The NASA questions and answers (in italics) are listed below along with the Climate Science response in bold font.
(Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Pre-industrial CO2 levels were about the same as
today. How and why we are told otherwise? - How many failed predictions, discredited assumptions and evidence
of incorrect data are required before an idea loses credibility? CO2 is not causing warming or climate change. It
is not a toxic substance or a pollutant. Despite this President Elect Obama met with Al Gore on December 9 no
doubt to plan a climate change strategy based on these problems. They make any plan to reduce of CO2 completely
unnecessary.
Proponents of human induced warming and climate change told us that an increase in CO2 precedes and causes
temperature increases. They were wrong. They told us the late 20th century was the warmest on record. They were
wrong. They told us, using the infamous “hockey stick” graph, the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) did not exist.
They were wrong. They told us global temperatures would increase through 2008 as CO2 increased. They were wrong.
They told us Arctic ice would continue to decrease in area through 2008. They were wrong. They told us October
2008 was the second warmest on record. They were wrong. They told us 1998 was the warmest year on record in the
US. They were wrong it was 1934. They told us current atmospheric levels of CO2 are the highest on record. They
are wrong. They told us pre-industrial atmospheric levels of CO2 were approximately 100 parts per million (ppm)
lower than the present 385 ppm. They are wrong. This last is critical because the claim is basic to the argument
that humans are causing warming and climate change by increasing the levels of atmospheric CO2 and have throughout
the Industrial era. In fact, pre-industrial CO2 levels were about the same as today, but how did they conclude
they were lower? (Dr. Tim Ball, CFP)
DEMING: Global warming freeze?
- President-elect Barack Obama recently declared his intention to mitigate global warming by enacting a
cap-and-trade policy that would reduce carbon emissions 80 percent by the year 2050.
But the last two years of global cooling have nearly erased 30 years of temperature increases. To the extent that
global warming ever existed, it is now officially over. (David Deming, Washington Times)
Setback for Hide on climate study bid - ACT leader
Rodney Hide has lost his bid to have a committee studying changes to the emissions trading scheme look at whether
global warming is taking place.
But he is claiming victory after National agreed that the committee could look at the accuracy of climate change
predictions.
Mr Hide, a minister in Prime Minister John Key's Government, said that opened the door to a broader look at the
science of global warming.
"I'm very happy with that because that covers the science. What I'm pleased about is that we're going to have
the sceptics [submitting], and there are a lot of them. (Dominion Post)
Australia's climate change
targets will be announced next week, says Penny Wong - CLIMATE Change Minister Penny Wong says Australia will
announce climate change targets next week.
Senator Wong said any discussion of targets would have to wait for that announcement.
At the same time the coalition is toughening its stance on emissions trading, suggesting a scheme should be
delayed until it has the broad support of industry. (The Australian)
Poorest need $1 bln for urgent climate projects -
POZNAN - Rich nations will be asked to contribute $1 billion to a fund to help the poorest countries implement
urgent projects to adapt to climate change, a top official said on Wednesday.
Boni Biagini, who runs the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) which was set up under U.N. auspices in 2001,
said funds would be raised based on an evaluation of plans from 38 of the world's poorest countries. (Reuters)
I'm all for helping countries develop but attempting to leverage the fraud of gorebull warming will end in
tears.
Climate Science, Economics and the
Orientation of Policies: A Dissenter’s Perspective - The attached text formed the basis for an invited
lecture at the Edinburgh Business School of Heriot-Watt University on 18 November 2008.
Prelude: It is an honour and a pleasure for me to appear today at the Edinburgh Business School of Heriot-Watt
University, and it is also a rare and welcome opportunity. I am grateful to the School for inviting me to make
this presentation.
First, a personal word. I am not a climate scientist. I am an economist, and a relative newcomer to climate change
issues, I became involved with the subject by accident rather than design. To begin with, my main involvement was
limited to some economic and statistical aspects of this huge and complex array of topics. Over time, however, my
interests and concerns have broadened in ways that I had neither planned nor expected. Increasingly, I have become
critical of the way in which the issues of climate change are being viewed and treated by governments across the
world, with widespread support from public opinion. I am now a non-subscriber to positions, arguments and policies
that find general and often unquestioning support. Today I will outline the minority views – you might well
think, the heretical views - that I have come to hold, and my reasons for holding them. (David Henderson via CCNet)
The Bailout That Won't - Would you buy a
car from Congress?
Leave it to Bob Lutz, GM's voluble vice chairman, to puncture the unreality of the auto bailout he himself has
been championing. In an email to Ward's Auto World, he notes an obvious flaw in Congress's rescue plan now taking
shape: The fuel-efficient "green" cars GM, Ford and Chrysler profess to be thrilled to be developing at
Congress's behest will be unsellable unless gas prices are much higher than today's.
"Very few people will want to change what has been their 'nationality-given' right to drive big and bigger if
the price of gas is $1.50 or $2.00 or even $2.50," Mr. Lutz explained. "Those prices will put the
CAFE-mandated manufacturers at war with their customers -- and no one will win in that battle."
Translation: To become "viable," as Congress chooses crazily to understand the term, the Big Three are
setting out to squander billions on products that will have to be dumped on consumers at a loss.
None of this was mentioned at four days of congressional bailout hearings, because Detroit knows better than to
suggest Congress has a role in the industry's problem. Yet its own recently updated Corporate Average Fuel Economy
regime, or CAFE, makes a mockery of the idea that government money will render the companies profitable, even as
the same bailout bill demands that the Big Three drop their legal challenge to a California mileage mandate even
more unsustainable than the federal government's. (Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., Wall Street Journal)
Just
14% Say Federal Government Will Run Big Three Better - Congress and the White House are fast reaching a deal
on a bailout plan for the Big Three that many suggest is just a step short of nationalizing the U.S. auto industry
since it gives the federal government a say in how the automakers spend their money and what kind of cars they
build.
But only 14% of U.S. voters think the Big Three automakers will run better if they are run by the federal
government, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.
Two-thirds of voters (67%) say the companies will not run better. Nineteen percent (19%) aren’t sure. (Rasmussen
Reports)
Bankrupt Bailout - As the Big
Three get closer to securing billions in aid from Congress, what was once called a "bailout" has turned
into a plan to nationalize the car companies. Bankruptcy is still the better idea. (IBD)
Terence
Corcoran: The price of oil returns to 'normal' - The number of big names who hung their hats on peak oil
theory is too lengthy to list
As the world price of crude oil soared up toward $150 a barrel earlier this year, even some of the most stalwart
defenders of the ability of man to keep oil flowing began to lose faith. Despite the long history of oil’s
downward price drift over most of the past 140 years, the idea that this time was different became almost a new
law of the world energy markets: Oil had reached it’s peak, the world was running out, the fundamentals of
market forces were at work, the price must soar and the result would be economic turmoil.
As it turns out, the opposite has happened. Oil traded at $43.72 yesterday. Philip Verleger, of the Haskayne
School of Business in Calgary, said yesterday that oil could go to $20 a barrel as the economic slowdown drags on
through the next year or more. Price recovery could take few years, before oil returns to “normal” levels.
(Terence Corcoran, Financial Post)
Latin America: An Ex-Exporter? - Latin
American economists frequently bemoan the fact that the region is heavily dependent on exports of raw materials
such as minerals, timber, agricultural products, and, of course, oil and gas. Economies suffer from dependence on
commodity markets that generally concentrate wealth in the hands of a minority elite. That in turn tends to breed
corruption, unemployment, and social unrest.
High commodity prices have made things worse in the region, giving countries a false sense of economic security as
G.D.P. growth outperforms the developed world. As a result, countries have done little to diversify their
economies: Mexico still exports crude and imports gasoline; Chile exports raw copper and imports copper wiring;
and Argentina depends heavily on Asian soy markets for its wealth.
While economists, investors, and government officials fear that the current global financial crisis will put
downward pressure on demand – and in turn, prices – for commodities, a greater threat could be imminent. The
region's status as a net energy exporter is at risk from bad government policies; in the long term, energy trade
deficits could put pressure on Latin America’s economic health. (Randy Woods, Energy Tribune))
Poland 'optimistic' on German
backing over coal power - WARSAW AND BERLIN say a "special arrangement" is needed to shield Poland's
coal-dependent economy from a new EU regime for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
Polish prime minister Donald Tusk said after receiving German chancellor Angela Merkel in Warsaw yesterday that he
was "optimistic" a deal could be found on carbon trading certificates ahead of talks in Brussels
tomorrow and on Friday.
Until now, Polish officials were ready to derail an EU plan to charge power generators for emissions permits in
the hope of reducing environmentally damaging carbon dioxide emissions.
Warsaw rejects the proposal as it stands, saying it does not take into account its 95 per cent dependence on
domestically mined coal for energy. (Irish Times)
JA Solar Slashes Revenue View - LOS ANGELES - Chinese
solar company JA Solar Holdings Co Ltd sharply reduced its fourth quarter revenue outlook on Wednesday, citing a
dramatic slowdown in orders.
The company's stock, which had been trading down about 1 percent before the announcement, slid 5 percent on the
news to close at $2.85 on Nasdaq.
JA Solar's warning came a day after Q-Cells, the world's largest maker of solar cells, stunned markets by abruptly
cutting its outlook for this year due to "a flood" of requests from customers to postpone deliveries.
(Reuters)
EU agrees 2020 clean energy
deadline - Green lobby and politicians hail agreement to use 20% renewables within 12 years as climate change
landmark
EU leaders today agreed to combat climate change by ordering a fifth of Europe's energy mix to come from renewable
sources within 12 years.
The agreement, hailed as "landmark" deal and a breakthrough by politicians and the green lobby alike,
came ahead of a crucial EU summit on Thursday, at which 27 prime ministers and presidents aim to finalise the
ambitious package to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2020. (The Guardian)
Britain Pledges Millions For Biomass Heating - LONDON
- The British government has pledged around 12 million pounds ($17.74 million) to help cover the costs of buying
and installing biomass-fueled heating, it said on Wednesday.
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) said the funding is available through grants of up to 500,000
pounds. The grants can cover up to 40 percent of the difference in cost between a biomass boiler and one which is
powered by fossil fuels such as coal and gas.
Commercial and industrial businesses, as well as schools, hospitals, local authorities, charities and housing
associations are all eligible to apply for the grants. (Reuters)
Waste coffee grounds offer new source of biodiesel fuel
- Researchers in Nevada are reporting that waste coffee grounds can provide a cheap, abundant, and environmentally
friendly source of biodiesel fuel for powering cars and trucks. Their study has been published online in the
American Chemical Society's (ACS) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. (American Chemical Society)
Separating myth
and evidence about electronic medical records - A national patient registry. National health information
technology (HIT). Electronic medical records (EMR). These are all terms for a nationalized electronic system that
connects government agencies, insurers, prescription benefit managers and healthcare providers, enabling seamless
access and sharing of our medical records.
It’s been widely promoted that electronic medical records will lead to significant healthcare savings and
improve the accuracy of communications among care providers, reduce medical errors, improve health and save lives.
But few consumers have looked past the claims to examine the evidence. Is there any evidence to support claims
that EMRs will save billions of dollars and improve patient outcomes?
Popular misperceptions of the efficiency of EMRs versus the reality for healthcare professionals, as we’ve seen,
may be why claims of benefits seem so plausible. For doctors and nurses charting patient assessments, care and
prescriptions, however, clicking through computer pages to select the appropriate standardized boxes and
responding to each electronic prompt are cumbersome and add little quality, individuality or accuracy to
communications among care providers. (Junkfood Science)
Family
lifestyle equals genes in obesity risk - NEW YORK - Obesity can run in families, but family lifestyle has just
as much to do with teenagers' weight as their genes do, new research shows.
"What we do as a family -- our family lifestyles -- matters for weight. Lifestyles aren't just about
individual behaviors," study author Dr. Molly A. Martin, Pennsylvania State University in University Park
told Reuters Health. The study is the first to demonstrate that the connection between parents and children's
weight is social as well as genetic. (Reuters Health)
That's odd, they vilified Atkins for telling you the same thing: Eat
more protein to burn more calories - Come January, many people will be heading back to the gym and cutting
calories in an effort to lose weight. But your efforts to slim down may be thwarted if you don't eat enough
protein.
According to an Australian study published in this month's issue of Nutrition & Dietetics, eating
higher-protein meals (think lean meat, poultry, fish, dairy, eggs and legumes) can improve the body's ability to
burn fat among people who are overweight and obese - an effect that can translate into shedding extra pounds.
Previous studies have hinted that higher-protein diets are better able to curb your appetite than traditional
high-carbohydrate meal plans. But now it seems that boosting protein can also help your body burn more calories.
(Globe and Mail)
Dressed to Kill: From Virus to Vaccine -- In a
pioneering effort, researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of
Queensland in Australia have successfully demonstrated that they can count, size and gauge the quality of
virus-like particle-based (VLP) vaccines much more quickly and accurately than previously possible. Their findings
could reduce the time it takes to produce a vaccine from months to weeks, allowing a much more agile and effective
response to potential outbreaks. (PhysOrg.com)
Sugar can be
addictive, at least in rats - CHICAGO - A study of rats offers scientific proof for what many dieters already
know: Sugar can be addictive.
"Bingeing on sugar can act on the brain in ways very similar to a drug abuse," said Bart Hoebel of
Princeton University in New Jersey, who presented his findings on Wednesday at a meeting of the American College
of Neuropsychopharmacology in Scottsdale, Arizona.
He said bingeing on sugar water produced behavioral and even neurochemical changes in rats that resembled the
changes produced when animals or people take substances of abuse. (Reuters)
Rats feel good being fed after a fast... imagine that.
Dubious claim du jour: Blue streetlights may prevent
crime, suicide - Blue streetlights are believed to be useful in preventing suicides and street crime, a
finding that is encouraging an increasing number of railway companies to install blue light-emitting apparatus at
stations to prevent people from committing suicide by jumping in front of trains. (Yomiuri Shimbun)
Corporate
welfare’s new clothes - Governments have long engaged in such ‘stimulus’ packages and with lousy results
In politics, it helps to have amnesia if one wishes to repeat history’s economic failures but offer them up in
the audacious wrapping of something “new.” For example, the current financial crisis is often incorrectly
blamed on a laissez-faire approach to regulation. But only if one forgets it was the U.S. federal government in
the 1970s under president Jimmy Carter which first pressured banks to lend to Americans who were high credit
risks, pressure then upped in the 1990s under Bill Clinton and subsequently defended by too many Democrats and
Republicans alike in past eight years. (Mark Milke, Financial Post)
Politics choke
clean-air efforts - Scientists say the EPA chief bowed to pressure from the White House, hampering
pollution-control efforts. (John Sullivan, Tom Avril and John Shiffman, Philadelphia Inquirer)
All those millennia people existed without industry and associated pollution -- their expected lifespans were
what, one-forth to one-half that of Industrial Man's, right? In fact developed world life expectancies have
roughly doubled since 1900, haven't they?
'Green terrorist' angers environmentalists
- POLICE have apologised for a hypothetical terror exercise in which a forest activist hijacks a plane and
threatens to crash it into a pulp mill.
The hypothetical scenario - acted out by about 70 police at Devonport airport on Tuesday under the codename
Western Approach - angered Australian Greens leader Bob Brown, the Tasmanian Greens and The Wilderness Society.
They called it offensive, unnecessary and irresponsible and made formal complaints to Tasmania police.
Acting Assistant Commissioner Steve Bonde later apologised, The Mercury reports.
The scenario involved a forest activist who hijacks an aircraft en route to King Island from Hobart and threatens
to damage the Wesley Vale pulp mill before landing the plane and taking the passengers hostage.
After negotiations, the armed offender leaves the building but is shot. (The Mercury)
Works for me. What's anyone's problem?
Veggie mouse with a taste for
albatross threatens island bird - A killer mouse that has turned from a shy vegetarian into a rapacious,
predatory carnivore is being blamed for the worst breeding season on record for a rare albatross.
Tristan albatrosses are found only on Gough Island, a British territory in the South Atlantic, and they are being
terrorised by house mice.
Since being introduced to the remote island, the mice have thrived in the absence of predators, and have grown so
bold that they attack and eat the albatross chicks. (The Times)
Fearing Backlash, Industry Urges Nanotech Safety -
CHICAGO - Fearing the emerging new field of nanotechnology will engender fears like those surrounding genetically
modified foods in Europe, companies are pushing government agencies for a more coordinated effort to ensure the
tiny nanomaterials are safe and environmentally friendly. (Reuters)
December 10, 2008
ANPR - The day after Thanksgiving was the deadline for
submitting comments to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR),
“Regulation of Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act.” The ANPR is EPA’s preliminary response to the
Supreme Court global warming case, Massachusetts v EPA (April 2, 2007). EPA invited public comment on literally
hundreds of issues but the main issue in dispute is whether EPA should issue a finding under Section 202 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new motor vehicles “cause or contribute to air
pollution” that “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” (Marlo Lewis, Cooler
Heads Digest)
Horse spit! Science
paves way for climate lawsuits - People affected by worsening storms, heatwaves and floods could soon be able
to sue the oil and power companies they blame for global warming, a leading climate expert has said.
Myles Allen, a physicist at Oxford University, said a breakthrough that allows scientists to judge the role
man-made climate change played in extreme weather events could see a rush to the courts over the next decade.
He said: "We are starting to get to the point that when an adverse weather event occurs we can quantify how
much more likely it was made by human activity. And people adversely affected by climate change today are in a
position to document and quantify their losses. This is going to be hugely important."
Allen's team has used the new technique to work out whether global warming worsened the UK floods in autumn 2000,
which inundated 10,000 properties, disrupted power supplies and led to train services being cancelled, motorways
closed and 11,000 people evacuated from their homes - at a total cost of £1bn.
He would not comment on the results before publication, but said people affected by floods could
"potentially" use a positive finding to begin legal action. (The Guardian)
We don't know the mean temperature of the Earth with anything like the accuracy normally suggested by
gorebull warming cranks and we don't know with any precision what it "should be". Heck, we don't even
know if global mean temperature guesstimates are even a useful of meaningful metric. Moreover, who is
responsible for the carbon emissions from say, coal-fired electricity, producer or consumer, on whose behalf the
producer gifts the essential resource to the biosphere? And what about that value, does that come off of
"costs"? Who would pay that -- farmers, whose crops benefit or the consumer of said crops? What about
wildlands and critter habitat, does the government owe for their aerial fertilization on our behalf? Allen is
romancing himself and anyone who believes this nonsense item.
Bush last-minute rules
cement environmental legacy - WASHINGTON - In his waning weeks in the White House, President George W. Bush is
drawing more fire than ever as he presides over a steady stream of environmentally unfriendly regulations meant to
last into the Obama administration.
"While the first 100 days of the Bush administration initiated perhaps the worst period of environmental
deregulation in American history, the last 100 days of a Bush presidency could be even worse," the staff of
the House of Representatives global warming committee wrote just before the November 4 election. (Reuters)
I wonder if the media will eventually admit Bush is right to put people first and environmental hysteria
second? One day they might erect statues to "W" for saving people from themselves but it will be a
long time coming -- most still won't admit Reagan was right when he stated trees emit volatile organic compounds
and contribute to smog production.
Obama
says climate change a 'matter of urgency' - CHICAGO -- President-elect Barack Obama says attacking global
climate change is a "matter of urgency" that will create jobs as he got advice from Al Gore, who won a
Nobel Peace Prize for his work on the issue.
In remarks to reporters, Obama made clear he would adopt an aggressive approach to global warming when he takes
over the White House on January 20.
He and Vice President-elect Joe Biden met for nearly two hours with former Vice President Gore at Obama's
presidential transition office in Chicago.
"All three of us are in agreement that the time for delay is over, the time for denial is over," Obama
said. (Reuters)
Schwarzenegger tells U.N.:
Green rules help markets - POZNAN, Poland - Green regulations will help both the environment and ailing
economies, California's Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger told a 187-nation U.N. climate conference on Monday.
(Reuters)
Uh... how far is California down the gurgler?
Lament from greenies that
the PM is beige, not bold (The Australian)
K.Rudd really does emulate Al 'Bigfoot[print]' Gore: The
Lodge and Kirribilli House have heavy carbon footprint - AT last - proof Kevin Rudd is full of hot air.
The Herald Sun can reveal The Lodge and Kirribilli House emitted 272 tonnes of carbon in just nine months.
It's about 21 times more than an average household, which emits about 14 tonnes a year.
The PM's hectic travel schedule also contributes to his huge carbon footprint.
If he travelled on a commercial carrier, he would have pumped out 90 tonnes of carbon by flying 264,764km this
year.
But he flies on an RAAF Boeing 737 with an entourage of advisers, lifting his travel emissions to an estimated
11,700 tonnes or more.
The Rudd family's household emissions include one tonne of wood burned in The Lodge's open fires, and about
240,000 kilowatt hours of electricity at both residences.
They also used 388,000 megajoules of gas for hot water, heating and cooking.
The PM would have to plant 2205 trees to offset his annual household emissions.
Mr Rudd won international praise for signing the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. (Ben Packham, Herald Sun)
To be fair The Land Down-Under is home of the macropods
so we should expect big footprints. In a way it is really nice to see at least one way Kevni is not all
talk, at last.
Wong
to resist calls for greenhouse cuts - THE Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, will confront international
calls for Australia to back tough targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions when she joins the UN climate talks in
Poland today as environment groups intensify their pressure on the Rudd Government to take tougher action at home.
A document released from the UN talks yesterday shows a significant number of countries, including China,
maintaining calls for developed countries to examine cutting greenhouse gases by between 25 and 40 per cent below
1990 levels by 2020. This was backed by a briefing from the UN's peak scientific body showing the cuts were needed
if the planet is to avoid a rise in temperature of more than two degrees and dangerous climate change.
But as Senator Wong arrived in Poland there was increased speculation at home that the Rudd Government wants to
limit Australia's 2020 target to cuts between 5 and 15 per cent when it announces its Carbon Pollution Reduction
Scheme next Monday. (Canberra Times)
Australia To Set 10 pct Carbon Reduction Target: Report
- SYDNEY - The Australian government has endorsed a carbon emissions reduction target of 10 percent by 2020,
following the introduction of a carbon trading scheme in 2010, the Australian Financial Review paper said on
Wednesday.
A more ambitious 25 percent reduction target would be kept open as a possibility if the international community
agrees to ambitious targets at a United Nations summit in Copenhagen at the end of 2009, the paper said without
citing sources.
The government's top climate adviser Ross Garnaut said in a report published in September that Australia should
aim to cut emissions by 5-10 percent by 2020. (Reuters)
21
spotless days and solar magnetic field still in a funk - We are now at 21 days with no sunspots, it will be
interesting to see if we reach a spotless 30 day period and then perhaps a spotless month of December. (Watts Up
with That?
Idiot! Human
rights and climate wrongs - Sixty years ago today, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the cornerstone document that was created in the aftermath of unimaginable
atrocities.
This declaration, and the legal documents that stemmed from it, have helped us combat torture, discrimination and
hunger. And now, this venerable document should guide us in the fight against one of the greatest challenges ever
to face humankind: climate change. (Mary Robinson, Sydney Morning Herald)
The poor are in far greater danger from gorebull warming hysteria and zealots driving absurd actions to
"address" the phantom menace than from any five other risks you could name.
Too
late? Why scientists say we should expect the worst - As ministers and officials gather in Poznan one year
ahead of the Copenhagen summit on global warming, the second part of a major series looks at the crucial issue of
targets (The Guardian)
Climate Talks To Fail Without Tough CO2 Goals: U.N. -
POZNAN - The United States and other rich nations must pledge by the end of next year specific targets for cutting
greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 to win agreement on a U.N. climate pact, the U.N.'s top climate official said on
Tuesday.
Some analysts say that President-elect Barack Obama may not be ready to set formal emissions targets for 2020
within a year, and that economic recession could delay an end-2009 deadline by 190 nations for agreement on a new
U.N. global warming pact.
"We have to have numbers on the table from industrialized countries (by the end of 2009) otherwise the other
dominoes won't fall," Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat said during December 1-12
talks on global warming. (Reuters)
About time! This stupidity is at least 20 years past its use-by date.
Dominic
Lawson: Kyoto is worthless (and you don't have to be a sceptic to believe that now) - The EU has managed to
claim success while increasing emissions by 13 per cent
Seldom has a politician's call to action been so rapidly answered. Mr Ed Miliband gives a newspaper interview in
which he demands "popular mobilisation" to force the world's governments to push through an agreement to
limit carbon emissions. Within hours, members of the Plane Stupid campaign occupy the runway at Stansted Airport,
causing arriving planes to circle for hours before being diverted. Well done, Ed!
In fact the Secretary of State for the Environment's demand for a "countervailing force" to be applied
to the carbon foot-draggers was anticipated: last week, "climate protesters" broke into one of Britain's
biggest power stations, managing to cut almost two per cent of the nation's power supplies. I imagine that the
Secretary of State for Energy will be having stern words with Ed Miliband. This, though, would mean Mr Miliband
shouting at himself, like a lunatic on a street-corner, since he is the Secretary of State for Energy, as well.
Who says we don't have joined-up government?
Both of these "mobilisations" were presumably designed, à la Miliband, to put pressure on the world's
environment ministers who are now gathering in the Polish city of Poznan to come up with the outlines of a treaty
to succeed the Kyoto Accord, which expires in 2012. The truth, however, is that Kyoto, as a means to reduce carbon
emissions, has been like Monty Python's parrot, long dead, despite all the protestations to the contrary by its
salesmen. (The Independent)
Kyoto
Protocol: BBC Continues to Flog a Dead Parrot - Dominic Lawson has consistently been a voice for sanity over
the debacles that are ‘global warming’ and the Kyoto Protocol. Today, Lawson excels himself in a splendid set
of ripostes in The Independent. The whole piece is an exemplary attack on nearly every nonsensical aspect of
policy with regards to climate change, but especially noteworthy is his scathing denunciation of the BBC, a topic
on which, reluctantly, I have had myself to comment recently. Here he is on the BBC’s Environment Analyst, Roger
Harrabin: (Clamour Of The Times)
Moonbat's getting provocative (looking for more ink to boost Xmas book sales George?): Cyberspace
has buried its head in a cesspit of climate change gibberish - The Stansted protesters get it. The politicians
of Poznan don't quite. But online, planted deniers drive a blinkered fiction (George Monbiot, The Guardian)
Rule of Law at Stake in UK - Yesterday the UK saw a large
group of protesters bring a major London airport to a halt. Plane Stupid (you can’t get them for false
advertising, that’s for sure) managed to cancel over 50 flights as the airport closed for five hours while
police arrested 56 people, of whom 49 have now been charged. (Iain Murray, Cooler Heads)
Class hatred at Stansted Airport -
Posh Plane Stupid insists that it is not picking on poor people. So why is it so madly obsessed with cheap
flights? (Brendan O’Neill, sp!ked)
Analysts say airport incursions might inspire
copycat tactics - LONDON - Protesters stormed the tarmac at one of Britain's busiest airports, shut down two
airports in Thailand and invaded a runway in Athens - and some experts see a worrisome pattern.
In the post 9/11 era, protests at sensitive international airports have become an effective way to rattle nerves
and publicize causes.
Philip Baum, editor of Aviation Security International, said there was an "increasing trend for demonstrators
to shut down airports."
Environmental action group Plane Stupid targeted Stansted Airport, northeast of London, in the most recent
protest, cutting through its perimeter fence Monday and briefly knocking out Britain's third-busiest airport.
(Associated Press)
Europe on collision course over emissions
costs - BRUSSELS, Dec 8 - European Union nations on Monday dug in for a battle over the costs of tackling
climate change, with few signs of compromise emerging ahead of a summit of EU leaders later this week. Two groups
have emerged to demand changes to the plan, threatening the chance of a successful deal to curb greenhouse gas
emissions. The margin between success and failure will be narrow, Czech Deputy Prime Minister Alexandr Vondra told
Reuters ahead of the two-day summit of EU leaders that starts on Thursday. (Reuters)
India won't
accept emissions limits, says climate envoy - The country's CO2 emissions are only one tonne per capita,
compared with 20 tonnes a head in the USA
India is not a "major emitter" of greenhouse gases and will not volunteer to take on responsibilities
that would see it accept legally binding limits, the country's special envoy on climate change has told the
Guardian.
Arctic
sea ice gone by 2015? A challenge to David Barber. - Here we go again. Last March I wrote about the media
predictions that the Arctic sea ice would be gone by the summer of 2012. As I showed back then, those wild
predictions were based on a simple extrapolation of the minimum summer sea ice extents of 2006 and 2007. (Climate
Sanity)
How
not to measure temperature, part 79 - could you, would you, with a boat? - Or maybe with the lack of grass,
“goat” might be more appropriate.
Every once in awhile (like once a week) I happen upon a NOAA USHCN weather station that leaves me wondering - what
were they thinking? (Watts Up With That?)
Homer's right, it just gets worse and worse: Scientists
try to mitigate climate change effects - POZNAN, Poland -- Scientists studying the changing nature of the
Earth's climate say they have completed one crucial task - proving beyond a doubt that global warming is real.
Now they have to figure out just what to do about it.
"It is critical for us to get a much better understanding of the impact of climate change in some parts of
the world," Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, told The
Associated Press in an interview Tuesday.
Scientific warnings of potential catastrophe have been the backdrop for talks among more than 10,000 delegates and
environmentalists negotiating a treaty to control the emission of greenhouse gases, which have grown by 70 percent
since 1970. The treaty, due to be completed in one year, would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.
Pachauri said he was concerned that negotiators were sparring and probing - and leaving key decisions for the last
moment. (Associated Press)
Do you suppose AP actually believes any of this garbage? Climate change is a fact, always has been,
always will be. Gorebull warming, on the other hand, is total nonsense.
<chuckle> UN suspends leading
carbon-offset firm - Emissions trading rocked as Norwegian company is left in limbo.
As international climate talks began last week in Poland, the United Nations (UN) suspended the work of the main
company that validates carbon-offset projects in developing countries, sending shockwaves through the
emissions-trading business. (Nature News)
'Climate Chancellor' No More - Angela
Merkel is facing withering criticism for remarks she made on Monday that seemed to back away from her earlier
commitment to tackling climate change. (Der Spiegel)
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
Perfect Droughts of Southern California (USA): How
bad were the really bad ones? ... and when might another occur?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data published by 643
individual scientists from 377
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm Period Record of the Week comes from Elk
Island National Park, East-Central Alberta, Canada. To access the entire Medieval Warm Period Project's
database, click here.
Subject Index Summary:
Tropical Cyclones (Atlantic Ocean - Global
Warming Effects: Frequency, The Past Few Centuries): What do multi-century records reveal about the propensity
of global warming to increase the yearly number of Atlantic hurricanes?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses to atmospheric CO2
enrichment obtained from experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Big
Bluestem, European Beech and Norway
Spruce Ecosystem, Garden Bean, and Rice.
Journal Reviews:
South African Urban Heat Islands: Have they
contaminated the country's purported contribution to global warming?
Hydrological Extremes of France: Have they changed
in any way in response to 20th-century global warming?
Dengue Fever in a Warming World: Does the latter
promote the spread of the former?
The Changing Response of Austrian Black Pine Trees to
Periodic Water Deficits Over the 20th-Century: How has it changed? ... and why?
Flower and Pollen Production in Birch Trees: How
are these reproductive characteristics affected by atmospheric CO2 enrichment?
CO2 Truth-Alerts:
Click here to watch short videos on
various global warming topics. Embed any Truth Alert video on your own web page or to watch it on YouTube in a
higher resolution. (co2science.org)
New
Book “Climate And The Hydrological Cycle” by Bierkens Et Al 2008 - There is a valuable new book of a
collection of papers Climate and the Hydrological Cycle, 2008; Edited by M.F.P. Bierkens, A.J. Dolman, P.A. Troch.
IAHS Special Publications 8. ISBN 978-1-901502-54-1. 344 pp, which provides documentation in several of its papers
as to why the hydrologic cycle is an intimate component of the climate system, as was concluded in the 2005 NRC
report National Research Council, 2005: Radiative forcing of climate change: Expanding the concept and addressing
uncertainties. Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate Change, Climate Research Committee, Board on
Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division on Earth and Life Studies, The National Academies Press, Washington,
D.C., 208 pp. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Shriek! IEA:
Energy security to come from mitigating climate change - HOUSTON, Dec. 9 -- The global economic slowdown
cannot distract policymakers worldwide from progressing on climate change mitigation efforts through international
accords and related national energy policies, said Richard J. Jones, deputy executive director of the Paris-based
International Energy Agency.
"Mitigating climate change will substantially improve energy security," Jones told a Dec. 9 energy forum
at Rice University's James Baker Institute for Public Policy. "I personally believe investment in energy is a
sound way to create jobs and get out of economic crisis."
Referring to IEA's World Energy Outlook 2008 report (WEO2008), Jones said a new international climate agreement is
the first step toward a sustainable energy system. Effective implementation of such a system is crucial, he said.
(Oil & Gas Journal)
What is this gibberish emanating from the IEA? Efforts to address the phantom menace pose the greatest threat
to energy security. Arrrggh!
Arkansas Governor says he no authority to
halt coal plants - Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe said Tuesday that he doesn't believe he has the power to issue a
moratorium on any new coal-fired power plants, offering a setback to environmentalists hoping to block a facility
under construction.
"My research is that I don't have the authority to go issue a moratorium under existing state and federal
law," Beebe told reporters after meeting with environmental groups opposed to a $1.5 billion coal-fired power
plant in Hempstead County.
Beebe met for about 40 minutes with a coalition of environmentalists who delivered more than 3,700 petitions
asking for such a moratorium on new plants. The group's members said at a news conference that they hope to
convince Beebe to halt the construction of a Southwestern Electric Power Co. plant in southwestern Arkansas.
Southwestern is owned by American Electric Power.
Environmental regulators decided last week to allow work to resume on the 600-megawatt plant near Fulton, which
the company hopes to complete in four years. An appeal is scheduled to go before an administrative law judge on
the plant's air permit next week. (Associated Press)
Oh... people aren't lining up to make Pickens richer: Pickens
"Anxious" Over Wind Farm Project Financing - NEW YORK - Texas oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens said on
Monday he is "anxious" for his company's multibillion dollar plans to build a giant wind farm in Texas
as the economic crisis chokes off project financing.
Mesa Power LLC is planning to build the world's largest wind farm in the Texas Panhandle, but financiers for the
project have disappeared in the economic downturn.
"Where's the money is the question. I don't know how we'll do it. I'm anxious to see what Obama comes up
with. There is no money to finance a wind project now," Pickens told reporters at a briefing in New York
City. (Reuters)
Finally realizing we can't control the climate? Climate
change experts 'lose faith' in renewable technology - Support for renewable energy technology to fight global
warming is weakening in the face of worldwide economic problems and the true scale of the carbon reductions
required, a survey published today has suggested.
Figures presented at the UN climate talks in Poznan, Poland, show that climate experts have less faith in
alternative energy than they did 12 months ago.
The survey shows less support for wind energy, solar power, biofuels, biomass and hydrogen energy as technologies
with "high potential" to reduce carbon levels in the atmosphere over the next 25 years. (The Guardian)
Veers immediately into nonsense: Scum
of the earth may save planet - THERE are many reasons for wanting to reduce our dependence on oil: the
increasing cost, reliability of supply, finite resources, the contribution of fossil fuels to global warming. (The
Australian)
There is no benefit in limiting or worse, reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide -- it's an essential resource,
the increasing abundance of which is highly beneficial for the biosphere.
Congress Has No Business In Auto
Industry - Let's not allow Congress and members of the bailout parade to panic us into allowing them to do
things, as was done in the 1930s, that would convert a mild economic downturn into a true calamity. Right now the
Big Three auto companies, and their unions, are asking Congress for a $25 billion bailout to avoid bankruptcy.
Let's think about that a bit.
What happens when a company goes bankrupt? One thing that does not happen is their productive assets go poof and
disappear into thin air.
In other words, if GM goes bankrupt, the assembly lines, robots, buildings and other tools don't evaporate. What
bankruptcy means is the title to those assets changes. People who think they can better manage those assets
purchase them. (Walter E. Williams, IBD)
53%
Oppose Government Loans to Automakers - Even as the White House and Congress put the finishing touches on a
$15 billion rescue package for the Big Three automakers, 53% of U.S. voters say they oppose taxpayer-funded loans
to help keep General Motors, Ford and Chrysler in business. (Rasmussen Reports)
Say NO to the Auto Makers Bailout!
- Taxpayers should not have to pay for their bad business decisions
Since the 1970s, Detroit's Big Three auto makers have failed to keep up in the competitive auto industry. High
labor costs and inflexible work rules, as well as a failure to overcome negative consumer sentiments have combined
to bring the Detroit-based auto manufacturers to their knees. Now they are begging the federal government for a
bailout to the tune of $75 billion! (FreedomWorks)
Are Fluorescents Really the Way to
Go? - The European Union began the process on Monday of moving away from the incandescent light bulb. But the
energy-efficient alternatives may not be all they're cracked up to be. They contain harmful substances and
disposal is difficult. (Der Spiegel)
Q-Cells Profit Warning Hits Solar Sector - FRANKFURT
- Q-Cells, the world's largest solar cell maker, cut its outlook and said its markets would stay subdued well into
2009, hitting shares across the sector on fears the financial crisis would eat into demand for renewable energy.
Chief Executive Anton Milner said economic uncertainty had led since late November to "a flood" of
requests from customers to postpone agreed deliveries until next year, and the company was planning a production
shutdown over Christmas.
"We expect to witness a very negative reaction for the whole solar universe today as Q-Cells is seen as one
of the bellwethers," Dexia analysts wrote in a note. (Reuters)
REC Says Not Yet Hit By Lower Demand Amid Crisis -
OSLO - Norwegian solar industry group Renewable Energy Corporation (REC) said on Tuesday it had not yet seen lower
demand as a result of the global financial crisis, but was expecting to see an impact. (Reuters)
Solar Panel Glut Expected In 2009: Suntech - POZNAN -
The solar power sector will produce an over supply of solar panels in 2009, said Zhengrong Shi, chief executive of
the world's biggest module manufacturer Suntech.
"We expect definitely an over supply of modules next year," he told Reuters in an interview, adding
Suntech expected its euro-denominated prices to fall by 10-15 percent next year, by 25-30 percent in dollars,
compared to the third quarter of 2008.
"The financial crisis has accelerated that situation," Shi said. The entire sector could halve the cost
of solar power before 2012, he added, assuming companies cooperated on cutting prices across the supply chain.
Low-carbon solar photovolataic (PV) power is much more expensive than fossil fuel alternatives and provides a tiny
fraction of the world's electricity. The sector is under pressure to cut costs to prove it can scale up. (Reuters)
Congress Should Expand Yucca Mountain Capacity: DOE -
WASHINGTON - Congress should expand the capacity of the planned U.S. nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain in
Nevada and delay a decision on whether to commission an additional dump site, the U.S. Energy Department said in a
report released on Tuesday.
"Unless Congress raises or eliminates the current statutory capacity limit of 70,000 metric tons of heavy
metal, a second repository will be needed," Energy Secretary Sam Bodman said in a statement.
The current capacity is not based on technical restrictions and the country's waste inventories will exceed that
limit by 2010, the department said.
The long-delayed nuclear waste dump is not expected to be opened until 2020 at the earliest, the department said
in June.
According to the report, the repository layout at Yucca Mountain can be expanded to hold three times or more than
the amount of waste now allowed at the site. (Reuters)
Self-reporting may not be accurate? Go figure... Fat
lies mask full extent of obesity - The obesity epidemic may be worse than previously thought with new research
showing men and women underestimate their weight and add centimetres to their height when answering health
surveys.
While the last national population survey found 54 per cent of people to be overweight or obese, the true figure
is probably 66 per cent, researchers at the University of Sydney say.
Maybe, although some of their complaints here are extremely poorly founded. For example as a young man a guy
may indeed have stood 6' tall and yet be slightly stooped and slumped to measure an inch shorter a few decades
later. Is he lying or even exaggerating to give his height as 6'? Of course not, the last time anyone bothered
to measure that's what he was and it still says so on his drivers license. Height decline after about age 30 is normal.
Should no longer standing as erect change a person's weight ratio?
Science
and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment - Risk assessment has become a dominant public policy tool for making
choices, based on limited resources, to protect public health and the environment. It has been instrumental to the
mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as well as other federal agencies in evaluating public
health concerns, informing regulatory and technological decisions, prioritizing research needs and funding, and in
developing approaches for cost-benefit analysis.
However, risk assessment is at a crossroads. Despite advances in the field, risk assessment faces a number of
significant challenges including lengthy delays in making complex decisions; lack of data leading to significant
uncertainty in risk assessments; and many chemicals in the marketplace that have not been evaluated and emerging
agents requiring assessment.
Science and Decisions makes practical scientific and technical recommendations to address these challenges. This
book is a complement to the widely used 1983 National Academies book, Risk Assessment in he Federal Government
(also known as the Red Book). The earlier book established a framework for the concepts and conduct of risk
assessment that has been adopted by numerous expert committees, regulatory agencies, and public health
institutions. The new book embeds these concepts within a broader framework for risk-based decision-making.
Together, these are essential references for those working in the regulatory and public health fields. (NAP)
Lookout! Stuff contains stuff! Personal care
products might contain harmful chemicals - Now we're really getting personal. We're focused on your private
place - the bathroom. That's generally where you use all that soap, body wash, shampoo and lotion. And deodorant,
perfume, shaving cream, lip balm, lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, hair gel, mousse, hairspray, anti-aging serum ...
(Kansas City Star)
Actually it is undeniably true that all chemical compounds are composed of [drum roll] chemicals. Some are
certainly therapeutically active (and that's exactly why you use them).
For the especially gullible: Mobile
phone chip to counter radiation unveiled - BRUSSELS - Belgian health products distributor Omega Pharma will
launch a chip it claims can counter potentially damaging radiation from mobile phones and has high hopes for its
sales.
The company, which sells non-prescription products such as wart treatments, pregnancy tests and sun tan lotions to
pharmacists, unveiled the E-waves phone chip on Tuesday, a day before its launch in Belgium.
Testing of the chip, which offsets the electromagnetic radiation from the phone, showed it lessened symptoms such
as headaches and loss of concentration that might be associated with mobile phone use, Omega said.
It also neutralized the heating effect within the body produced by electromagnetic signals.
Testing of consumers appetite for the product, costing 38.95 euros ($50.1), will start on Wednesday. (Reuters)
By the way, this chip is not for intended for internal use.
Peter
Foster: Where anti-capitalists hang themselves - Robert Reich combines the economic insight of Lou Dobbs with
the objectivity of Al Gore
Does the free market corrode moral character? The question is front and centre in the avalanche of claims that the
ongoing financial crisis is rooted in the greed of fat cat Wall Street bankers, and that Wall Street is typical of
capitalism more generally. But markets are far broader and more pervasive than Wall Street, and the larger issue
of their relationship to notions of right and wrong is addressed in a fascinating online discussion available at
www.templeton.org/market.
The John Templeton Foundation, whose mission is to “serve as a philanthropic catalyst” likes to address “Big
Questions,” and this is certainly one of the biggest. (Peter Foster, Financial Post)
Here's a wildly contentious piece: Surface-level
ozone pollution set to reduce tree growth 10 percent by 2100 - Modern day concentrations of ground level ozone
pollution are decreasing the growth of trees in the northern and temperate mid-latitudes, as shown in a paper
publishing today in Global Change Biology. Tree growth, measured in biomass, is already 7% less than the late
1800s, and this is set to increase to a 17% reduction by the end of the century.
Ozone pollution is four times greater now than prior to the Industrial Revolution in the mid-1700s; if modern
dependence on fossil fuels continues at the current pace, future ozone concentrations will be at least double
current levels by the end of this century with the capacity to further decrease the growth of trees. (Wiley)
Everything I've seen suggests increasing biomass (due to aerial fertilization from increasing atmospheric
carbon dioxide) and this lot come up with a reduction in biomass since the late 1800s? NASA has even
issued press releases on the greening of northern mid and high latitudes being visible from space and yet these
guys come to the opposing conclusion of reduced biomass... Very dubious.
In
New Era, Timber’s Struggles Stir Broad Concern and Support - SEELEY LAKE, Mont. — A scramble is under way
here in Montana to save the historically important, culturally resonant timber industry — once a pillar of the
state’s identity, now under siege as demand for housing and wood products has plummeted in the national economic
downturn.
But what makes this debate different from those about saving automobile makers or banks and whoever else is in
line for a bailout are the multiple layers of connection to things that might seem to have nothing to do with
two-by-fours, plywood or even jobs.
Climate change, for example — how to manage state and federal forest lands as new diseases and insects threaten
them in a warmer future — and the soaring costs of fighting wildfires in the West have both become part of the
discussion. If the state loses its base of roughly 200 interconnected sawmills, pulp buyers and family-owned
tree-cutting contractors, advocates say, who will be left to work in the woods to make them usable, beautiful and
safe, and at what cost?
“Our fear is that we could lose our infrastructure — the base of knowledge and experience of working in the
forest,” said Mary Sexton, the director of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. “Once
it’s gone, it’s gone.” (New York Times)
Oh dear... Farmers
'more open' to beating climate change - Farmers are more optimistic about their ability to adapt to climate
change than ''tree-changers'' who buy a country property as a lifestyle choice, new research says.
A study by Charles Sturt University found traditional broadacre farmers were confident they could meet the
challenges of climate change by new techniques such as soil improvement, planting farm trees, growing fodder crops
and using minimum soil tillage methods.
Among lifestyle farmers, a lack of confidence in being able to adapt to climate change was linked to higher levels
of personal stress, social researcher Rik Thwaites said.
''We found many of the lifestylers had expectations of moving to the country to live a comfortable green
existence, but their expectations were challenged by the realities of drought, fire and lack of water.'' (Canberra
Times)
... comparing experienced people who know what they are doing with naive twits blundering out of the cities.
And guess what? Experienced people are more confident in their coping abilities...
Another eat-the-creature feature: Eat
camels to protect environment, Aussies told - Australians were urged Tuesday to eat camels to stop them
wreaking environmental havoc, just months after being told to save the world from climate change by consuming
kangaroos.
A three-year study has found that Australia's population of more than a million feral camels -- the largest wild
herd on earth -- is out of control and damaging fragile desert ecosystems and water sources.
The Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre, which produced the report, plans to serve camel meat at a
barbecue for senior public servants in Canberra on Wednesday to press its point.
Report co-author Professor Murray McGregor said a good way to bring down the number of camels was to eat them. (AFP)
EU Watchdog Says Agri-Environment Policy Badly Run -
BRUSSELS - European rules linking payment of subsidies to farmers with protection of the environment are poorly
managed and enforced, the European Union's financial watchdog said on Tuesday. (Reuters)
Secret ingredient for the health of tropical rainforests
found - A team of researchers led by Princeton University scientists has found for the first time that
tropical rainforests, a vital part of the Earth's ecosystem, rely on the rare trace element molybdenum to capture
the nitrogen fertilizer needed to support their wildly productive growth. Most of the nitrogen that supports the
rapid, lush growth of rainforests comes from tiny bacteria that can turn nitrogen in the air into fertilizer in
the soil. (Princeton University)
Wonder if they realize that's why fertilizer manufacturers offer molybdenum as an added trace nutrient for
Australia's depleted soils?
December 9, 2008
The Wrong Scary Toy Story - One in three toys
was found to have “significant levels of toxic chemicals, including lead, flame retardants and arsenic,”
according to a new report from
the anti-chemical industry. But don’t let the report’s political agenda distract you from very real toy safety
issues. (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
This is where the cranks have it bassackwards: Ecoflation,
a new worry, could hit consumer goods - WASHINGTON - Add another economic worry to inflation and deflation:
ecoflation, the rising cost of doing business in a world with a changing climate.
Ecoflation could hit consumer goods hard in the next five to 10 years, according to a report by World Resources
Institute and A.T. Kearney, a global management consulting firm. (Reuters)
The answer is not to change either companies or consumers but to get rid of the cranks causing the
unwarranted inflationary pressures.
Hmm... Obama to meet with Gore on
climate change, energy - WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama will meet Tuesday with former Vice
President Al Gore in Chicago to discuss energy and environmental policy, the transition team and Gore’s office
confirmed today. (Houston Chronicle)
... Biden did say Obama would soon be tested by terrorists. So, it begins, or does it...
The Obama-Gore Consensus - The
birth of climate pork.
Barack Obama's great virtue is his ability to behave like a cynical politician without getting a reputation as a
cynical politician.
The latest example is his left-pleasing promise during the campaign for a windfall oil tax, now quietly removed
from his transition Web site. Explained an aide, the tax was all along meant to apply only if oil prices are over
$80 a barrel. "They are below that now and expected to stay below that."
Mr. Obama here makes a choice in favor of good economic policy. But there's something else going on. He's a
student of the late radical thinker Saul Alinsky, who argued that you do or say what's necessary in a democracy to
gain power, while keeping your true aims to yourself. Mr. Obama's novel contribution has been to turn this
exploitation on his supporters on the left (who admittedly are so wedded to their hero that, so far, they don't
seem to mind).
His next big challenge is an upcoming conference updating the Kyoto targets. Mr. Obama has not backed off his
overwrought climate rhetoric, but listen carefully to Al Gore. Now that Democrats are on the verge of power, he's
backing off cap-and-trade and carbon-tax proposals (i.e. visible energy price hikes for consumers) in favor of a
new approach -- massive government subsidies for "green technology."
Two fans, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, co-founders of the Breakthrough Institute, write approvingly of
what they call Mr. Gore's highly "significant shift." "He knows that cap-and-trade, and most any
new regulation, would raise energy prices -- a political nonstarter during a recession."
Uh huh. Mr. Gore, when he's close to power, always drops the politically unpopular medicine his climate views
would seem to necessitate. When he ran for president, he tried to lower gasoline prices by opening up the
petroleum reserve. There was no recession at the time.
But the former veep is perfectly in sync with Mr. Obama. Energy taxes popular with the left but unpopular with
voters will soon be off the table to preserve his second-term hopes. But that doesn't mean an end to "climate
policy, " which can still be used to foster a network of trade groups willing to kick back some of their
taxpayer subsidies to maintain Democrats in power. This will do nothing for climate change (and indeed nothing
proposed or entertained in Washington would make a difference to climate). But it will help cement Democratic
ascendancy over Washington's iron triangle of interest groups, politicians and the bureaucracy.
Indeed, Mr. Gore, as an investor and promoter of several green energy funds himself, is a walking conflict of
interest here -- one whose bogus credibility Mr. Obama will happily make use of. Alinsky would be proud. (Holman
W. Jenkins Jr., Wall Street Journal)
The impossibility of
objectivity - Too often, disagreements on any issue – including scientific ones – are a dialogue of the
deaf. It is rare indeed for two people with radically opposed views to be prepared to listen or accept that there
may be nuggets of truth in their opponent's arguments. This does not just apply to activists with a firm belief in
a particular cause, it is also characteristic of professional scientists who we might naively expect to behave
better.
The reason for this is simple. We all have inbuilt world views and biases, and they inevitably colour our
judgement, however objective we strive to be. We talk about scientific facts, but (at the risk of sounding too
post-modernist) many of these are based on a particular accepted interpretation of the available evidence.
Scientists should always strive to be objective and base their conclusions on hard data. As the newly-fashionable
Keynes said "when the facts change, I change my mind". But the human mind all too often does not work
like that. Consciously or unconsciously, we tend to look for evidence which supports our own views, and ignore or
devalue contrary observations.
It is quite possible to persuade someone of your point of view if they have no strong opinion in the first place,
but almost impossible if they have already made their own judgment. This is why rational, evidence based argument
so often fails to convince. It does not mean that scientists (and others) should stop doing it, but they should be
realistic about the chances of success. The aim must be to persuade the non-aligned members of an audience, rather
than win over opponents. (Scientific Alliance)
This might explain why no amount of evidence nor reasoned argument seems able to dissuade or even give pause
to CAGW believers (for new readers CAGW is the acronym for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming in
all its various guises: climate interference, disruption, change, man-made warming...).
This tedious rubbish, again: Climate change: Sci-fi
solutions no longer in the margins - With political efforts to tackle global warming advancing slower than a
Greenland glacier, schemes for saving Earth's climate system that once were dismissed as crazy or dangerous are
gaining in status. (AFP)
If the planet warms that will be great, if not, well, we'll adapt to any foreseeable change but it will be
neither easy nor pretty but what we most assuredly do not want is some dill trying to cool the planet -- ever.
Just what are
falling temperatures evidence of? - If increasing temperatures are consistent with or are evidence of global
warming, what theory is consistent with or evidence of falling temperatures? Global warming, too?
We have to ask this complicated question because it was just reported that this year’s global average
temperature is on track to be the coldest in the last eight years. In other words, the temperature has dropped,
and has been dropping for a couple of years.
So, do these falling temperatures mean that global warming has stopped or is false? (William M Briggs,
Statistician)
North's
Exposure - Someone just sent me a transcript of a taped interview with Jerry North of Texas A&M doing what
he can to diminish climate skepticism and some individual skeptics — and, in the process, merely diminishing
himself. (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Oh... Too
late? Why scientists say we should expect the worst - As ministers and officials gather in Poznan one year
ahead of the Copenhagen summit on global warming, the second part of a major series looks at the crucial issue of
targets (David Adam, The Guardian)
The Chilling effect:
Paris to press UK
and Germany on climate deal - The UK and Germany are being pressed to agree a bigger subsidy to eastern
European countries as France makes a last-minute effort to rescue an ambitious climate agreement.
Nicolas Sarkozy, president of France, which holds the rotating presidency of the European Union, will raise the
matter with Gordon Brown in talks today in London following discussions with Angela Merkel, German chancellor, on
Sunday.
Mr Sarkozy is seeking their agreement to bolster the climate package’s so-called “solidarity fund” ahead of
a two-day summit of European heads of state that begins on Thursday. (Financial Times)
Merkel vows to resist EU climate deal if
jobs threatened - German Chancellor Angela Merkel vowed Monday to resist any European Union deal on climate
protection this week that might jeopardise jobs.
Speaking ahead of an EU summit starting Thursday in Brussels, Merkel told the top-selling Bild newspaper: "It
must not take decisions that would endanger jobs or investments in Germany."
"I will make sure of that," she added. (AFP)
Merkel Backpedals on Climate -
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has long been on the front lines in the battle against climate change. But with
the economy in a downturn, she may be changing her tune.
It used to be that when environmentalists looked to Berlin, they saw one of their closest allies in the fight
against climate change. For much of the last three years, Chancellor Angela Merkel has made the fight to reduce
global CO2 emissions a signature issue of her government.
On Monday, though, Merkel finds herself under fire from many of her former allies. In a Monday article in the
mass-circulation tabloid Bild, Merkel said that she will not approve any European Union climate rules "that
endanger jobs or investments in Germany." (Der Spiegel)
Proliferating nonsense: EU agrees to
switch off old-style light bulbs by Sept. 2012 - The European Union decided to phase out traditional household
light bulbs by September 2012 in favour of new energy-saving models that use a fraction of the electricity.
From next September, 100-watt versions of the old incandescent bulbs will be banned from Europe's shops and other
bulbs with lower wattage will follow in the ensuing years, EU experts decided in a vote in Brussels. (AFP)
Ya mean it's supposed to do something? Report
Says 2 Global Programs To Curb Emissions Fall Short - The Government Accountability Office, in a report issued
as negotiators convened the latest round of U.N. climate talks in Poland, has concluded that two key international
programs aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions are not getting the job done.
The study, requested by Rep. Joe L. Barton (R-Tex.), ranking minority member of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, and two other House Republicans, highlights problems in the European Union's emissions trading system
and in a U.N. program that allows industrialized countries to offset their domestic greenhouse gas emissions.
The GAO said that Europe's cap-and-trade system had created "a functioning market for carbon dioxide
allowances, but its effects on emissions, the European economy, and technology investment are less certain."
A separate program that grants offsets to industrialized nations for funding energy projects in the developing
world, investigators wrote, has had an "uncertain" effect on carbon emissions, "and its impact on
sustainable development has been limited." (Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post)
Olympic-class conclusion leap: Global warming aided
by drought, deforestation link - In the rainforests of equatorial Asia, a link between drought and
deforestation is fueling global warming, finds an international study that includes a UC Irvine scientist.
The study, analyzing six years of climate and fire observations from satellites, shows that in dry years, the
practice of using fire to clear forests and remove organic soil increases substantially, releasing huge amounts of
climate-warming carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. (University of California - Irvine)
It's easier for people to burn forests when they are dry [!] but it does not necessarily follow that the
liberated carbon dioxide has anything to do with subsequent global mean temperature. In fact we know the
enhanced greenhouse hypothesis is severely flawed since the expected tropical mid-troposphere "hot
spot" has spectacularly failed to appear (not just "weaker than expected" or even smaller --
failed completely). So adding tropical carbon dioxide is doing, um... nothing.
Climate
inquiry will not question global warming science - A parliamentary committee inquiry into climate change
policy will not relitigate the science that blames humans for global warming, according to new terms of reference.
The National government has put the emissions trading scheme (ETS) on hold while it conducts a complete review. (NZPA)
Then it's not a complete review, is it?
CO2
and Temperature Relationship Reaffirmed - Questions Flat Ice Core CO2-Graph During 1000 Years? - I came across
Hans Errens illustration showing the yearly growth in CO2 concentration as a function of UAH global temperatures:
It appears from this graph that CO2 concentrations follows temperature with a lag of approximately 6-9 months. The
interesting part is of course that the CO2 trends so markedly responds to temperature changes. I wanted to get a
clearer picture of this relationship, and thus took approximately 20 datasets from this graph And plotted them in
a scatter graph to see the trend, and got the following result: (Frank Lansner, Icecap)
Virtual refugees in virtual worlds driven by virtual disasters... U.N.
says climate change may uproot 6 million annually - POZNAN, Poland - The impact of climate change could uproot
around six million people each year, half of them because of weather disasters like floods and storms, a top U.N.
official said on Monday.
The U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) was making plans based on conservative estimates that global warming would force
between 200 million and 250 million people from their homes by mid-century, said L. Craig Johnstone, the U.N.
Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees.
"That means a displacement of something like six million people a year -- that's a staggering number,"
he told Reuters on the sidelines of the December 1-12 U.N. climate talks in Poland. (Reuters)
Are
There Long-Term Trends in The Start Of Freeze-Up And Melt Of Antarctic Sea Ice? - On Thursday, December 4
2008, Climate Science posted the weblog Are There Long-Term Trends in The Start Of Freeze-Up And Melt Of Arctic
Sea Ice?
Thanks to Bill Chapman of the University of Illinois, who hosts the excellent website Cryrosphere Today, we now
have the corresponding data for Antarctic. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Southern Ocean resistant to changing winds -
Intensifying winds in the Southern Ocean have had little influence on the strength of the Southern Ocean
circulation and therefore its ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, according to a study published
in Nature Geoscience. (CSIRO Australia)
Actual data shows models guess wrongly, again. Who would have guessed...
Dutch research into fair-weather clouds important in
climate predictions - Research at the Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands) has led to better
understanding of clouds, the unknown quantity in current climate models. The Delft researcher Thijs Heus has
tackled this issue with a combination of detailed computer simulations and airplane measurements. He charted data
including cloud speed, temperature and the 'life span' of clouds to arrive at new observations. (Delft University
of Technology)
Granted, clouds are a huge unknown in climate modeling but they most certainly are not "the"
(singular) unknown -- the only thing we are sure of in climate is that there is much more we don't know than
that we do.
Fickle Sun
Brought Down Ancient Emperors - CHURCHVILLE, VA—A North China cave stalagmite just produced an amazingly
precise record of China’s rainfall over the past 1800 years, proving that variations in the sun’s
activity—through weaker monsoons and poor rice crops—helped bring down three historic Chinese dynasties (the
Tang, Yuan, and Ming dynasties).
In contrast, the sun sent abundant rainfall for the Song Dynasty, producing rich rice harvests, social stability,
and population growth through the 10th-13th centuries—a period known to the world as the Medieval Warming. The
Chinese recorded the Song abundance in both historic documents and cave-wall paintings. (Dennis T. Avery, CGFI)
Not So Confident - I notice
with some mild amusement that Joe Romm, who viciously attacks anyone daring to offer a view on climate change
science or policy that differs from his own, has offered a bet on future climate change (emphasis in original):
(Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Oh boy... Kulongoski
objects to BLM logging plan - PORTLAND, Ore. — Gov. Ted Kulongoski has asked the Bureau of Land Management
to hold off on its plan to increase logging on federal lands in Western Oregon.
In a letter dated Monday, The governor cited the BLM's failure to go through formal consultation with federal
scientists over the potential harm to salmon and northern spotted owls.
He also expressed concern over issues such as water quality and the lack of a guarantee that the BLM will use
forest management strategies consistent with the fight against global warming. (Associated Press)
What Happened to Oil Prices? Don’t Buy the Hype!
- What goes up, must come down, or so the saying goes. Why, then, did so many analysts drive us into a
forever-fear mode vis-a-vis oil prices as recently as a few months ago? Some said $200 would soon be the
per-barrel price.
Excuse me? What's that about new analyst predictions of $25 oil?
Barely five years ago, the editor-in-chief of World Oil magazine declared "The world is awash with oil."
His point was that talk of oil "running out" was just plain foolish. Really, there is no shortage of
oil, nor will there by any time soon (as in, years and years and years and years and years).
My friends, there were many plants in the dinosaur days, and many large beasts that wandered this Big Blue earth
of ours. Hence, there is no shortage of oil. There is, however, a shortage of common sense, and perhaps an even
greater dearth of decency amongst the analysts of this world. As oil prices rose and rose and rose, a few folks on
this planet thought: "This is crazy! What the heck is happening?" However, no one seemed willing to go
on record, not even the oil gurus. Believe me, I tried, and I know lots of energy execs. So, what gives? (Eric
Kavanagh, Energy Tribune)
OPEC Oil Investment Plans On Track, For Now -
The warnings from the International Energy Agency and others are ominous: a prolonged world recession could lead
to underinvestment in upstream energy projects that will likely lead to a future oil supply crunch. For now,
countries in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries armed with a huge war chest, are continuing to
invest. But that might not be enough.
There are signs of delays and budget slashing outside of OPEC. Grim forecasts of a prolonged economic global
slowdown are discouraging investment in high-cost projects, such as deepwater drilling and oil sands. And some
OPEC members have warned that their upstream investments will be at risk if prices stay low.
But there’s little evidence that OPEC’s biggest oil exporters are significantly cutting back on upstream
expenditures. Only about 10 percent of the $90 billion earmarked in the Middle East and Africa for upstream
projects in the next five years through 2013 has been shelved, according to a recent report by the Arab Petroleum
Investment Corporation, an affiliate of the 10-nation Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries. (Andres
Cala, Energy Tribune)
Just what no one needs... Climate change
campaign call - A Government minister has called for a global protest movement along the lines of Make Poverty
History to pressure world leaders into signing an agreement to tackle climate change.
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said "popular mobilisation" was needed to help politicians force through a
deal in the face of fears about the impact on a struggling global economy.
In an interview with The Guardian, he said: "There will be some people saying 'We can't go ahead with an
agreement on climate change, it's not the biggest priority'. And therefore you need countervailing forces. Some of
those countervailing forces come from popular mobilisation. (Press Association)
... a twit inciting antisocial activity by neo-Luddites.
Protesters break into secure area at UK
airport - Dozens of environmental activists broke into a secure area of a London airport Monday, chaining
themselves to each other and barricading themselves behind fencing in a protest against air-traffic pollution.
Protest Group Plane Stupid, known for its attention-grabbing stunts, said activists stormed Stansted Airport
before dawn and staged their protest near the taxi area where planes travel between takeoff and landing. The
activists are opposed to a possible expansion of the airport.
Police said that 57 activists were arrested, most on suspicion of trespassing. (Associated Press) | Passengers'
fury as climate change protest at Stansted airport forces dozens of flights to be cancelled (Daily Mail)
All suspected terrorists penetrating, or attempting to penetrate secure areas should be shot on sight.
That such a policy would reduce the number of village idiots and other plainly stupid antidevelopment
"protesters" is a major plus.
U.K.
Greens’ Uncivil Disobedience - There could be no better snapshot of the elitism, killjoyism, and outright
snobbery of the radical environmentalist movement than the protest taking place at Stansted Airport in London
today.
Here we have an attempt by a tiny clique of well-to-do eco-protesters — with Middle-England names like Joss,
Tamzin, and Lily — to prevent thousands of people from flying abroad, whether for fun, to meet loved ones, or,
in one distraught woman’s case, to attend her father’s funeral in the Republic of Ireland. This is the very
essence of environmentalism: an aloof effort to police and restrain the desires of the mass of the population.
(Brendan O’Neill, Planet Gore)
Plane Selfish - Ridiculous,
self-indulgent, self-absorbed, self-righteous, and self-important protest outfit, Plane Stupid broke into Stansted
Airport today, to delay the reopening of a runway. (Climate Resistance)
How Long Before We
See Eco-Terrorism? - Today's news that Stansted airport, the third largest in Britain, had been shut down for
five hours by a group of "climate activists" provides yet further evidence that we are faced by a
dramatic new escalation in the battle over "global warming".
More than 50 flights were cancelled and thousands of dismayed passengers milled about in chaos and confusion, as
the protestors, under a banner reading "Climate Emergency", blocked off a runway with metal barriers and
padlocked themselves to fences.
Although the police eventually arrested 57 people on various criminal charges, what was significant was that the
young demonstrators, most between 18 and 23, declared that they were so "terrified" by the threat of
global warming that they were quite prepared to break the law in support of their demands that the government must
take much more immediate and drastic action to "save the planet".
This was precisely the kind of thing we were warned of three months ago after a landmark case involving another
group of "climate activists" charged with causing criminal damage to a power station in Kent.
(Christopher Booker, EU Referendum)
Peru’s Surging Natural Gas Business - Peru's
phenomenal economic growth in recent years has boosted the country's prominence in Latin America. It has also
caused more than a few headaches for government planners, as energy demand has expanded faster than expected.
Inadequate transmission and natural gas pipeline capacity has further exacerbated the problem, putting Peru under
threat of power outages and forcing generators to increase imports of high-cost diesel.
If the government is to be believed, the problem will be short lived, as projects are underway to increase
generation and transmission capacity and expand natural gas pipelines. But the current energy crisis will have
long-lasting consequences, as it has forced the country to rethink how best to take advantage of its newfound
natural gas wealth. It's becoming increasingly clear that Peru will not expand its natural gas export program
beyond the one liquefied natural gas project that is on track to start operations in about a year. (Randy Woods,
Energy Tribune)
Turkmenistan Joins the Natural Gas Elite: The
South Yolotan-Osman Gas Field is one of the World’s Largest - The growth in global natural gas resources
continues to grow. In July, a study done by Navigant Consulting estimated that America’s potential gas resources
may total 2,200 trillion cubic feet. That’s 50 percent more gas than Russia and twice as much as Iran. A more
recent study, published in mid-November by consulting firm ICF International, estimated U.S. gas resources at
1,830 Tcf. The big U.S. gas numbers are being driven by shale gas plays in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma
and elsewhere.
And while those U.S. gas reserves are important, the gas story that could alter the balance of power in Asia is
coming out of Turkmenistan. (Peter C. Glover, Energy Tribune)
Colliery on track for record
output shows King Coal is striving to regain crown - Britain's coal industry is on track to break a new
production record as it expands at a time when many environmentalists are calling for it to be cut back or closed
down.
The West Midlands colliery of Daw Mill near Nuneaton is expected to produce more coal this year than any other in
the history of an indigenous industry that began with the Romans.
And this week a rig will move into position to drill three exploratory boreholes that could lead to reopening of a
mothballed mine at Harworth in north Nottinghamshire.
Daw Mill has already mined 3m tonnes this year and staff are confident of hitting 3.25m tonnes by the end of this
month, beating a 13-year-old record for annual output set at Selby, North Yorkshire. (The Guardian)
No again: Scientists turning CO2 from coal-fired
plants, algae into oil - Eliminating greenhouse gases and developing new, non-petroleum-based fuels are two of
America's biggest environmental challenges. University of Kentucky researchers think algae might offer an answer.
(Lexington Herald-Leader)
Eliminating greenhouse gases is something we definitely do not want to do.
France is
poised to be nuclear leader - "We thought there was a future in nuclear power when no one else believed
in it," said Anne Lauvergeon, chief executive of Areva. The French government-owned company is building the
first nuclear reactors to be constructed in western Europe for nearly 20 years.
With "no oil, no gas, no coal and no choice," France decided to go nuclear in 1974, and today about 80
percent of its electricity is generated by 59 nuclear plants across the country. But even France became
pessimistic about nuclear power: It stopped building new reactors at the end of the 1980s and in 2002 a government
report called the industry a "monster without a future."
How things have changed. Nuclear power is back in favor, thanks to fears about oil supplies, energy security and
global warming. France is poised to develop its expertise into a significant export. Its president, Nicolas
Sarkozy, considers the sale of nuclear power to be central to his diplomacy: It is a badge of France's technical
prowess and a reaffirmation of its status as a global industrial power. Soon after his election 18 months ago, he
toured countries from China to Libya to tout France's nuclear expertise, signing deals to open the way for French
firms to sell reactors. (The Economist)
Iraq Aims to Double Power Output - Over the
next few years, Iraq hopes to double its power generation capacity using gas-fired turbines. But it is still
unclear whether the country can overcome the chronic power shortages that have plagued it since the U.S. invaded
in 2003.
Despite recent electric grid upgrades, only about half of Iraq’s electricity demand is currently being met,
according to the latest quarterly report from the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR).
Problems are numerous, and range from water shortages and lack of fuel oil to run generators, to insufficient
transmission lines and a dearth of trained personnel. Add in years of neglect and underinvestment, as well as
security problems, looting, and sabotage, and the enormity of the problem becomes obvious. (Andres Cala, Energy
Tribune)
This is how you do it -
How do you create an obesity epidemic in a country with nearly the lowest percentage of “obese” people in the
world?
You begin by changing the definition.
On Tuesday, Health Ministry officials in India released the country’s first Guidelines for the Prevention and
Management of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. It begins by making significant departures from World Health
Organization definitions for overweight and obesity. According to new cutoffs enacted by Indian health officials,
anyone with a body mass index of 23 kg/m2 is now labeled as overweight. And a BMI of 25 and over is now defined as
obese — considerably more stringent than the international cut-off of a BMI 30.
[As you may remember, overweight used to be defined as a BMI of 27 before the U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood
Institute changed the definition to 25 to match new international guidelines in 1998.]
As the Daily News & Analysis in Mumbai (Bombay) reported , men with waistlines of 35 inches or more and women
with waistlines of 31.5 inches or more are now considered obese by the new norm. These, too, are well below the
WHO cut-offs of 40.2 and 34.6 inches, respectively. (Junkfood Science)
Malaria vaccine may be
available in 2012 - A vaccine against the parasitic disease malaria cut illnesses by more than half in field
trials and could be safely given with other childhood inoculations, two studies have reported. The vaccine, which
will begin a third and final phase of clinical trials early next year, could become the first to protect children
from malaria, which kills 1 million people worldwide every year.
The studies, published online today in the New England Journal of Medicine, were reported at a New Orleans meeting
of tropical medicine researchers and were hailed as a significant breakthrough in the fight against one of the
most intractable and deadly infectious diseases. (Los Angeles Times)
Stifling Dissent on
Malaria - Despite all its good work, the Gates Foundation is encouraging a harmful trend among malaria
activists.
Nine months ago, The New York Times reported that Dr. Arata Kochi, head of malaria control at the World Health
Organization (WHO), was worried the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was undermining scientific creativity in a
way that “could have implicitly dangerous consequences [for] the policymaking process in world health.”
According to Kochi, the Gates Foundation’s research support comes with strings attached. He expressed concern
that Gates-funded studies were adopting “a uniform framework approved by the Foundation,” leading to
homogeneity of thinking. Gates has created a “cartel,” said Kochi, with research leaders linked so closely
that “each has a vested interest to safeguard the work of others. The result is that obtaining an independent
review of scientific evidence…is becoming increasing difficult.”
Kochi never intended for his remarks to be aired publicly; his internal WHO memo was leaked to the Times. But it
had a welcome effect, briefly galvanizing a debate about the best ways to spend aid money—a debate that could
lead to new discoveries, more effective interventions, and many more lives saved.
Unfortunately, the malaria community has recently been discouraging debate over a new initiative known as the
Affordable Medicines Facility for Malaria (AMFm), which was approved by the United Nations-backed Global Fund in
early November. The AMFm will spend some $2 billion on anti-malaria drugs over the next five years. It may
increase access to good quality medicines and save thousands of lives. But it may also increase drug resistance by
pouring medicines of unknown quality into poor countries with underregulated health systems. (Roger Bate, The
American)
Rise in autism
linked to shift in age at diagnosis - NEW YORK - The apparent increase in the prevalence of autism that many
studies have reported in recent years may be attributable, at least in part, to a drop in the age at diagnosis
over time, the results of a Danish study suggest.
"Our study is the first study to quantify how decreasing age of diagnosis inflates the observed prevalence of
autism," lead author Dr. Erik T. Parner, from the University of Aarhus, told Reuters Health. "We were
surprised that the impact of shifts in age of diagnosis on the observed autism prevalence was so great."
The study, which is reported in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, included all 407,458 children
born in Denmark between 1994 and 1999. (Reuters Health)
D'oh! Back
at Junk Value, Recyclables Are Piling Up - Trash has crashed.
The economic downturn has decimated the market for recycled materials like cardboard, plastic, newspaper and
metals. Across the country, this junk is accumulating by the ton in the yards and warehouses of recycling
contractors, which are unable to find buyers or are unwilling to sell at rock-bottom prices.
Ordinarily the material would be turned into products like car parts, book covers and boxes for electronics. But
with the slump in the scrap market, a trickle is starting to head for landfills instead of a second life. (New
York Times)
Bee Epidemic
Threatens Chunk of Menu as Science Debates Cause -- Honey isn’t the only thing we’d miss if bees
completely disappeared.
“Bees are a profound part of the ecosystem, much more than we ever thought,” said Rowan Jacobsen, whose
chilling new book, “The Fruitless Fall: The Collapse of the Honey Bee and the Coming Agricultural Crisis”
(Bloomsbury), gives us a taste of a world without honey, not to mention other goodies bees make possible. The
tall, lanky 40-year-old author talked with me at a new East Village restaurant fittingly called Apiary while
promoting his book in New York.
“Fruitless Fall” details the recent rise of Colony Collapse Disorder. Bees, around for the past 100 million
years, have been mysteriously dying in droves -- about 30 billion worldwide last year alone. (Bloomberg)
December 8, 2008
Here we go again: UN
is told that Earth needs an asteroid shield - Scientists call for £68m a year to detect danger, and more for
spacecraft to defend against it (Robin McKie, The Observer)
Lot's have people have tried to convince me over the years that there is some merit in NEO hand-wringing, all
unsuccessfully. Bottom line is there is a minuscule chance we'll get clobbered and absolutely jack we can do
about it. Worry about real problems because we are most unlikely to still be around next time a planet-stomper
arrives. Even in the slightly more-likely event of an air-burst "city-killer" it's still 30:1 that it
will be over ocean (70% of globe) or lightly-/un-inhabited regions (the great bulk of relatively dense human
population occupies just 3% of the Earth's surface). A lot more lives can be saved spending the money on
vaccination programs, water reticulation, sanitation, infrastructure development or virtually anything
other the the care and feeding of a few the-sky-is-gonna-fall-someday paranoiacs.
Don't worry fellas, we found footage of the planetary defense squad:
Another excuse for the 'missing' catastrophic warming? Melting
ice may slow global warming - Scientists discover that minerals found in collapsing ice sheets could feed
plankton and cut C02 emissions
Collapsing antarctic ice sheets, which have become potent symbols of global warming, may actually turn out to help
in the battle against climate change and soaring carbon emissions.
Professor Rob Raiswell, a geologist at the University of Leeds, says that as the sheets break off the ice covering
the continent, floating icebergs are produced that gouge minerals from the bedrock as they make their way to the
sea. Raiswell believes that the accumulated frozen mud could breathe life into the icy waters around Antarctica,
triggering a large, natural removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
And as rising temperatures cause the ice sheets to break up faster, creating more icebergs, the amount of carbon
dioxide removed will also rise. Raiswell says: ' It won't solve the problem, but it might buy us some time.' (The
Observer)
When will these guys admit there is no physically plausible enhanced greenhouse risk?
Just for laughs: Arctic
will have first ice-free summer in 2015: Researcher - WINNIPEG - The ice that has covered the Arctic basin for
a million years will be gone in little more than six years because of global warming, a University of Manitoba
geoscientist said.
And David Barber said that once the sea ice is gone, more humans will be attracted to the Arctic, bringing with
them even more ill effects.
“We’ll always have ice in the winter time in the Arctic, but it will always be first-year ice,” Barber said
on Friday.
He said he estimates the Arctic sea should see its first ice-free summer around 2015. (Winnipeg Free Press)
Satellite
derived sea level updated- short term trend has been shrinking since 2005 - We’ve been waiting for the UC
web page to be updated with the most recent sea level data. It finally has been updated for 2008. It looks like
the steady upward trend of sea level as measured by satellite has stumbled since 2005. The 60 day line in blue
tells the story. (Watts Up With That?)
Cold is the new warm - When
is a short term trend not a short term trend? When it’s an upward anomaly.
James Randerson in the Guardian tells us that,
This year is set to be the coolest since 2000, according to a preliminary estimate of global average
temperature that is due to be released next week by the Met Office. The global average for 2008 should come in
close to 14.3C, which is 0.14C below the average temperature for 2001-07.
But just when you thought it was safe to rush out to buy a guilt-free 4×4… <scary music> (Climate
Resistance)
Romm’s Fairy Tales -
Where Cold is Warm - In another fable on Climate Progress, chief alarmist blogger Joseph Romm claims “The
climate story of the decade is that the 2000s are on track to be nearly 0.2C warmer than the 1990s. And that
temperature jump is especially worrisome since the 1990s were only 0.14C warmer than the 1980s (see datasets
here). Global warming is accelerating, as predicted.”
Nothing could be farther from the truth. Of course he chooses to use the bogus GHCN/ GISS global data which is
contaminated from many factors (see this EPA comment on the data issues with this data set). The issues include
global station dropout (6000 to under 2000 with just over 1000 used last month). Most of the dropout occurred
after 1990 and most stations that dropped out were rural. There was a tenfold increase in missing monthly data
after 1990, requriing infilling of missing month using surrounding months or nearest urban stations. Both these
lead to warm biases. There was a change of instrumentation that Karl of NCDC showed led to a warm bias.
After Roger Pielke Sr and others did a survey of stations in eastern Colorado and found the vast majority did not
meet government standards including the climate stations, Anthony Watts started a volunteer effort to survey US
climate stations in the 1221 USHCN network using the governments own criteria on surfacestations.org. About
halfway through that assessment, he has found only 4% have met standards and 69% were poor or very poorly sited.
All of these factors introduce a warm bias. (Joseph D’Aleo, AMS Fellow, CCM)
Why sequester CO2 gas, which is good for
agriculture, reforestation - Why are we going to spend trillions of dollars sequestering CO2 to mitigate
global atmospheric warming, while our empirically-tested temperature models (e.g., see “Greenhouse Gases and
Greenhouse Effect”, published in the last issue of Environmental Geology, or “Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2
Emission”, published this year in Energy Sources Journal) shows that increasing concentration of CO2 in the
atmosphere causes cooling rather than warming?
In the dense earth’s troposphere, the heat from the Earth’s surface is mostly transferred by convection,
approximately 67%. Radiation accounts for approximately 8%. Why is this important fact ignored by most scientists?
(George Chilingar, CFP)
Oh dear... Murray
Darling chief says river will never be same - PARTS of the River Murray's ecology will be lost or changed
forever by the drought and global warming, the head of the new Murray Darling Basin Authority says.
In his first interview with The Advertiser since being appointed chairman and chief executive of the
soon-to-be-operational Murray Darling Basin Authority, Rob Freeman said the body would achieve a world first when
it established a single plan for a river system covering both environmental and economic sustainability. (Adelaide
Advertiser)
... The Murray is a permanent river because it is constrained by weirs and locks and boosted with diverted
waters from the Snowy Mountains Scheme, prior to which it was a seasonal string of billabongs which flooded into
an occasional river. If drought and gorebull warming dried the big creek it would then be
returning to its natural, pre-European settlement state. For the head of the river management authority to make
such achingly stupid statements is truly frightening.
Bill Carmichael:
Cold reality of fuel bill rises - THE Lord must have a wickedly mischievous sense of humour – because every
time the great and good convene to discuss global warming, He sends a splendid joke in the form of freezing cold
weather.
This phenomenon happens so frequently in the United States that it has its own name – the Gore Effect, named
after the presidential sore loser and high priest of the global warming cult, Al Gore.
Whenever Saint Al arrives in his private jet to lecture lesser mortals about the evils of flying, you can
guarantee that temperatures will plummet to sub-Siberian levels.
He is a walking one-man cold front.
But, weirdly, the same thing is now happening on this side of the Atlantic, too. (Yorkshire Post)
Poland and Germany clash over CO2
emissions permits - Germany sparked a row with Poland yesterday after demanding free pollution permits for its
coal-fired power stations in a dispute that threatens to scupper agreement next week on ambitious plans to cut
back European carbon dioxide emissions.
President Nicolas Sarkozy of France will meet Donald Tusk, Polish prime minister, and eight other east European
leaders in Gdansk, Poland today to try to overcome their resistance to the emissions-reducing package ahead of the
European Union summit on Thursday.
But Polish officials said that Warsaw would vigorously oppose any German demands that its energy intensive
industries receive free CO 2 emission permits rather than pay for them. (Financial Times)
No deal amid EU climate deadlock - France's
Nicolas Sarkozy, the current EU president, has failed to break a deadlock with Eastern member states over an
ambitious climate change deal.
Mr Sarkozy said there had been progress but that the end had not yet been reached ahead of an upcoming EU summit.
Countries including Poland and the Czech Republic oppose deep cuts in carbon dioxide emissions, saying they
unfairly penalise their need for coal.
Polish PM Donald Tusk said a compromise would need a lot more hard work. (BBC News)
UN
Panel Says Global Financial Crisis May Curb CO2 Emissions - Delegates at a United Nations meeting to discuss
the world’s climate said Thursday that the global financial crisis will likely provide a reprieve from the spike
in recent years of greenhouse gas emissions. They also warned that nations will struggle to adopt long-term shifts
to more environment-friendly lifestyles. (redOrbit)
Hot air not so valuable? Go figure... EU CO2 To Drop 10 pct
Below 2007 Levels: Deutsche - LONDON - European Union industrial emissions could fall by 10 percent below 2007
levels next year, Deutsche Bank said on Thursday, unnerving traders on the possibility of another price collapse
in carbon permits.
The German bank cut its previous forecasts, saying lower productivity from companies participating in the EU's
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) coupled with corporate efforts to meet EU renewable energy targets could lead to a
surplus in emissions permits over the next three years.
This will depress prices for permits (EUAs) traded in the scheme's second phase (2008-12), possibly forcing a
retest of the all-time low of 11.80 euros a tonne, the bank said, prompting trader worries over a possible repeat
of the scheme's first phase when EUA prices fell to zero. (Reuters)
Chemicals
boss warns of exodus - Prime minister is urged to change EU climate change rules to prevent mass exit
JIM RATCLIFFE, the reclusive billionaire behind Ineos, Britain’s largest private company, has warned Gordon
Brown that hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost if the prime minister commits Britain to tougher EU curbs on
carbon emissions.
Ratcliffe issued the warning in a letter last week that was also signed by Paul Thompson, chief executive of
GrowHow, the UK’s last remaining fertiliser manufacturer, and Steve Elliott, head of the Chemical Industries
Association.
It is part of a feverish, last-ditch effort by the chemicals industry and other big energy users to force changes
to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) ahead of a summit of EU leaders this week in Brussels, where they are
expected to sign off on a bloc-wide climate-change package. (Sunday Times)
Director of Harvard Environmental
Economics Program assails AB 32 plan - I finally got around to reading all 147 pages of the peer review of the
ARB's scoping plan for implementing AB 32 and other climate change measures. All I can say is I never have to
write a critical word of my own again about Arnold's approach to global warming and his claims it will be an
economic bonanza. All I have to do is quote the experts. Consider this impassioned broadside from Robert Stavins,
the director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, who all but accuses CARB of fraud and suggests the
agency will set back the cause of responsibly fighting global warming: (Union-Tribune)
Horse spit! Climate
change demands cool heads and compromise - THE UN Climate Change Conference in Poznan, Poland, focuses
attention on the importance and difficulty of achieving international agreement to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
No country acting alone - not even the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, the US and China - can cause the
risks of dangerous climate change to fall substantially by its actions alone. A co-operative effort involving all
substantial economies is required. (Ross Garnaut, The Australian)
Even if all human emissions stop today there will be no measurable change in global mean temperature.
Seeking snout-space at the government trough: Northrop Urges
Obama: Boost Climate-Change Tech - WASHINGTON - Northrop Grumman Corp, a top Pentagon supplier, urged
President-elect Barack Obama on Friday to lead a drive harnessing technology, much of it developed for national
defense, to cope with global climate change. (Reuters)
EU Delays Decision On Forest Offsets - POZNAN - The European Union
has delayed a decision on whether to allow EU companies to offset their greenhouse gas emissions by investing in
tropical forest conservation, EU officials said on Friday.
The EU would publish detailed proposals in January on how to finance ways to slow deforestation in tropical
countries, EU executive Commission official Juergen Lefevere said on the sidelines of U.N.-led climate talks in
Poland. (Reuters)
Euro Parliament Warns On Carbon Offsets - BRUSSELS - European
nations must scale back their hopes of reaching carbon reduction goals cheaply by paying for easy cuts in the
developing world, a leading negotiator in EU climate talks said on Friday.
The global carbon market works by putting a cap on greenhouse gases in rich countries. They can exceed these
targets, but only if they pay for corresponding emissions cuts -- known as offsets -- in the developing world.
"It's a dangerous illusion that our emissions reductions can be mainly based on CDMs (offsets) while we
continue with business as usual here," said Finland's Satu Hassi, a leading European Parliament negotiator in
talks with member states. (Reuters)
Maneuvering for your tax dollars: Business
leaders urge climate action - THE business leaders of 140 global companies are calling for immediate deep and
rapid cuts in greenhouse gas emissions as UN talks on climate change enter their second week.
They have rejected arguments the global economic downturn is reason to tread softly, saying decisive action now
will stimulate economic activity. (Australian Associated Press)
New
Paper “Update On A Proposed Mechanism For The Regulation Of Minimum Mid-Tropospheric And Surface Temperatures In
The Arctic and Antarctic” by Herman Et Al 2008 - We have a new paper that is “in press” for publication;
Herman, B., M. Barlage, T.N. Chase, and R.A. Pielke Sr., 2008: Update on a proposed mechanism for the regulation
of minimum mid-tropospheric and surface temperatures in the Arctic and Antarctic. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., in
press with the abstract: “This paper is an update from our earlier paper to include data through July 2008.
In our earlier paper, which included data through 1998, a mechanism which generally limits Arctic minimum 500 mb
temperatures to the -40C to -45C range was presented. The current paper is in agreement with those earlier
findings and also shows some evidence of later autumn onset dates of the initial appearance of these temperatures,
in agreement with the recent reduction of Arctic sea ice cover in the summer and fall. In the southern hemisphere,
little change can be seen for the seasonal onset and end of the temperatures reaching -40°C area, while the
appearance of temperatures reaching -44°C area seems to show a later onset date beginning about 1998, but this
time period is too small to define a clear trend. The limiting of the minimum of these midtropospheric
temperatures has important implications for minimum surface temperatures that can occur over land during the
Arctic winter.” (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
November 2008
Global Temperature Update: +0.25 deg. C above normal. (Roy Spencer)
Enviro-quacks? Sheesh! Climate
change a worry for doctors - ALTHOUGH the public accepts that climate change is a major issue that must be
addressed in the interest of the world's environment and future economy, many health professionals have asked:
what has climate change to do with health? Hopefully this question was put to rest when the World Health
Organisation selected "protecting health from climate change" as the theme for World Health Day last
April 7. WHO recognises that climate change is posing an ever-growing threat to global public health and that
"wherever you live, climate change threatens your health". (David Shearman and Michael Kidd, The
Australian)
You'd think they'd know that net excess deaths are associated with cold conditions both regionally and
globally and thus doctors interested in saving/prolonging lives should be all for gorebull warming.
Twaddle: Maria
Neira: If we improve our health care, we can beat climate change - The human cost of climate change may be
measured in the toll imposed by droughts, floods and heat-waves. The World Health Organization (WHO) and climate
change experts have warned of the adverse effects global warming has on air quality, food production, water
availability and the distribution of infectious diseases. Yet policy-makers, and even the health community, have
given insufficient attention and resources to using health-related arguments to enhance public understanding of
the need for stronger climate-change control measures.
This is not sufficiently forward thinking. We know that current climate-related threats to human health can be
avoided or controlled by relatively routine and inexpensive public health measures. Furthermore, awareness of the
significant health benefits and consequent cost savings of well-conceived climate control policies can be an
effective driving force for global action. (The Independent)
Climate changes. Either we adapt to it or we don't but there is no such thing as an effective or
well-conceived climate control policy.
<chuckle> The Global
Warming Deniers Are Restless - Just when you thought it was safe to acknowledge the unequivocal reality of
global warming…..
Just when you thought the U.S. government was ready to admit that it has a serious emissions problem, and do
something about it….
Just when you thought the skeptic party was over…
No way: There has been a strong run of nonsense from global warming "skeptics" and deniers lately. They
are not ashamed, and they are not changing their tune. In fact, it sounds like they are gearing up for the next
battle.
The George C. Marshall Institute is planning an event with Roy Spencer, of the University of Alabama-Huntsville,
postulating that global warming isn't human caused after all--it's the "Pacific Decadal Oscillation."
Never mind the IPCC, which is beyond confident at this point that what we're seeing has human, and not natural
causes. (Sheril Kirshenbaum, Smog Inc)
If the smog mob actually believe any of the crap they distribute they are in for a really hard time as
reality inevitably intrudes. Kinda feel sorry for them really.
Upsetting the hysterics: New
US military report on global warming raises worry - WASHINGTON - A new US military report has come under
scrutiny for asserting that the scientific data on what is causing global warming is "contradictory" - a
position one leading specialist said indicates the government still hasn't fully embraced the urgency of climate
change.
The long-range planning document, published Thursday by the US Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Va., which is
responsible for developing blueprints for future military strategy, is intended to provide a "basis for
thinking about the world a quarter of a century from now."
But a section of the 56-page report on climate change and natural disasters prompted criticism yesterday from some
leading specialists who said that spreading the inaccurate perception that the causes of climate change remain an
open question could result in government agencies not taking the issue seriously enough. (Boston Globe)
That climate is but poorly understood is hardly an inaccurate perception -- we don't know near enough to make
predictions years in advance and may never do so. Some good
comments here, too.
Skepticism
on climate change - THE MAIL brings an invitation to register for the 2009 International Conference on Climate
Change, which convenes on March 8 in New York City. Sponsored by the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based think
tank, the conference will host an international lineup of climate scientists and researchers who will focus on
four broad areas: climatology, paleoclimatology, the impact of climate change, and climate-change politics and
economics.
But if last year's gathering is any indication, the conference is likely to cover the climate-change waterfront.
There were dozens of presentations in 2008, including: "Strengths and Weaknesses of Climate Models,"
"Ecological and Demographic Perspectives on the Status of Polar Bears," and "The Overstated Role of
Carbon Dioxide on Climate Change."
Just another forum, then, sounding the usual alarums on the looming threat from global warming?
Actually, no. The scientists and scholars Heartland is assembling are not members of the gloom-and-doom chorus.
They dispute the frantic claims that global warming is an onrushing catastrophe; many are skeptical of the notion
that human activity has a significant effect on the planet's climate, or that such an effect can be reliably
measured or predicted. Some point out that global temperatures peaked in 1998 and have been falling since then.
Indeed, several argue that a period of global cooling is on the way. Nearly all would argue that climate is always
changing, and that no one really knows whether current computer models can reliably account for the myriad of
factors that cause that natural variability.
On this they would all agree: Science is not settled by majority vote, especially in a field as young as climate
science. (Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe)
Waiting on a better deal: Russia
to keep hold of ‘hot air’ - Russia has confirmed that it will not sell its massive surplus of “hot
air” carbon allowances onto the world carbon market up to 2012, but has not ruled out doing so in later years.
Like other former Soviet bloc nations, Russia was handed a paper windfall under the Kyoto Protocol when the UN set
it a greenhouse emissions reduction target far above its current emissions levels. Kyoto targets are set against a
base year of 1990, but eastern European nations had already seen their emissions plummet soon after 1990 as old
industry collapsed along following the demise of the Soviet Union.
There has long been speculation over how much of its emissions surplus Russia would sell, and the government has
been under international pressure not to flood the market and undermine real emission-cutting actions in other
countries. A bloc of African nations called for a commitment from developed nations at the current UN climate
meeting in Poland to refrain from using these surplus allowances. They are known as AAUs and are issued by the UN
to governments.
But Victor Blinov, the deputy head of Russia’s delegation at the conference, has stated in an interview with
Bloomberg that all the AAUs would be banked for possible future use in the next climate agreement due to take
effect from 2013. (Carbon Positive)
Rasmussen Offers “Straight Talk
About Energy Policy” - Kimball Rasmussen, president and CEO of Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, the Utah
G&T, gave a presentation this week to CFC employees at their Herndon, Va., headquarters based on his recent
position paper, “A Rational Look at Climate Change Concerns and the Implications for U.S. Power Consumers.”
The 50-page white paper does a skillful job of discussing NRECA’s “Our Energy/Our Future” campaign and
explaining the complex science—and its inconsistencies and shortcomings—used to calculate the effects of
global warming, referencing the recognized authority on global warming science, the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (Kimball Rasmussen, Solutions )
There is
no case for Heathrow's third runway - The decision last week by Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon to delay a
ruling on Heathrow's third runway until early in 2009 has been cited as evidence of a possible government retreat
from the project. That interpretation is premature. The plan to expand Heathrow has powerful backers, from the
Prime Minister to British Airways, and from the CBI to major unions. All are likely to pursue its implementation
with vigour.
At the same time, the cabinet will have noticed opposition to the runway has broadened. It no longer emanates
exclusively from the standard alliance of eco-campaigners and local objectors that gathers when major construction
programmes are mooted. Anti-runway adherents today include many backbench Labour MPs and ministers, including
Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband, Environment Secretary Hilary Benn, and the Conservative party.
All have made it clear they believe that a third Heathrow runway and the resulting expansion of Britain's aviation
industry do not represent sensible use of resources. Mr Hoon should spend his festive season in careful
contemplation of these views. (The Observer)
And he should rapidly conclude these antidevelopment, antimodern nitwits can go sit on a mountain of lima
beans but that they have neither justification nor right to interfere in the lives of real people.
“Energy Security for
Australia – find more oil, waste it less”. - A statement by Viv Forbes, Chairman of the Carbon Sense
Coalition.
The Carbon Sense Coalition today called on Australian governments to focus more on energy security, particularly
domestic oil exploration, production and refining capacity.
Responding to a Queensland government paper entitled “Towards Oil Resilience”, Viv Forbes, Chairman of
“Carbon Sense”, said that far too much exploration land was locked up in No-Go areas such as marine parks,
national parks, world heritage areas, aboriginal reserves and other restricted areas.
“Oil tankers pose far more threat to the coastline and the Great Barrier Reef than would a few oil production
platforms and far less eyesore and hazard than hundreds of wind towers.
“A few inconspicuous oil wells would also disfigure the outback environment far less than thousands of solar
panels. And they do less environmental damage than clearing or cultivating vast tracts of land to convert food
into ethanol.
“Australia is a huge island in a remote corner of the world. Everything we eat, export or import relies on
ships, planes, tractors, trucks and trains. These all run on hydro-carbon fuels.
“Yet every Ministerial statement on energy prattles on endlessly about wind, solar and geothermal energy. For
the foreseeable future, our mobile machinery will run on oil, gas, or electricity from coal.” (Carbon Sense
Coalition)
Wind power
targets unrealistic, say critics - Claims in a Government-commissioned report that wind power can supply a
third of Britain's electricity have been condemned as wildly optimistic by leading experts. (Daily Telegraph)
Shell
to quit wind projects - ROYAL DUTCH SHELL has become the second big energy company to abandon the UK
wind-energy sector in the last month.
Shell, Danish firm Dong Energy and Scottish Power have cancelled the £800m Cirrus Array project off the northwest
coast after five years and millions of pounds in investment.
The consortium blamed Ministry of Defence concerns over radar interference from turbines.
Less than a month ago, Shell denied a Sunday Times report that it had exited the project. However, on Friday the
company confirmed that it had no plans for further investment in the UK wind sector. (Sunday Times)
US Ethanol Profits Down As Oil Price Plummets - NEW YORK - Weekly
profit margins for U.S. ethanol distillers fell a few cents a gallon to even grimmer levels as gasoline prices
plummeted, analysts said.
"It's all a function of demand. Global demand for oil and gasoline is down and that has put downward pressure
on ethanol," Cory Garcia, a senior researcher at Raymond James & Associates in Houston. said. (Reuters)
Got it in one - "worthless output": Botched
biofuel legislation stalls climate change initiative - The government has blown a hole in its climate change
plans by misdrafting a key piece of legislation covering the introduction of "green" fuel for motorists.
The Department for Transport admitted last night that there was an "error" in the law governing the
Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) and it was going to have to put it right.
The RTFO was introduced this year as a way of ensuring that up to 2.5% of all petrol and a similar amount of
diesel poured into cars and trucks came from low-carbon fuels. It was linked to the Hydrocarbon Oil Duty Act which
missed out a vital reference to bioblends, which are part fossil fuel and part biofuel.
The error means that oil companies and supermarkets will be able to get away with meeting half these combined
targets this year, which could have an impact on 2009, according to the Renewable Fuels Agency, responsible for
overseeing the sector.
Biofuels manufacturers said they feared a "catastrophe" if forecourt suppliers cut back on their
commitments and clean-fuel refiners are left with worthless output. (The Guardian)
Preventive health and
wellness information brought to you by… - How can you recognize sound health information on the internet
from quackery? In the most surreal case of cognitive disconnect, the federal agency in charge of regulating
fraudulent health claims on the internet, and promoting and protecting public health, has entered a partnership
that will lead consumers to a website with some of the very same spurious health claims it is busily trying to
shut down… (Junkfood Science)
Can most online
health information be trusted? - In our connected society, it’s easy to overestimate people’s internet
savviness. With more than 1.1 billion health websites on the worldwide web, it’s also easy to believe good
information is abundant and simple to find. Recent studies have revealed how false those beliefs are and how
vulnerable most people are, even healthcare professionals. (Junkfood Science)
Bring back DDT: Bed bug explosion
makes city life suck - BLAME everything from council clean-up scabs to dirt cheap airfares, Sydney's bed bug
problem has exploded with a 4500 per cent increase in treatments for the tiny pests.
It has become so bad Westmead Hospital will, for the first time, run courses on how to detect and control the
blood suckers next year.
Summer's warmth kicks the creatures into active mode and yesterday Australia's top bed bug expert, Westmead
Hospital entomologist Stephen Doggett, said: "In the past few weeks I've had a lot of calls and I expect an
explosion of calls now it's getting warmer. Everywhere from five-star hotels to family homes can be infested.
Between 2000 and 2006 there was a 4500 per cent increase in calls."
Mr Doggett said the bugs were now resistant to common insecticides after being wiped out in Australia during the
1950s with the aid of the now banned chemical DDT. (Daily Telegraph)
Eek! A chemical! Consumer
commission sued over chemicals in toys - NEW YORK - Two public advocacy groups sued the U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission on Thursday, saying the commission is acting unlawfully by not planning to fully implement a new
ban on toys containing toxic chemicals.
The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan says that, contrary to a new ban that goes into effect
February 10, 2009, the CPSC has decided to allow chemical-laden toys and child-care products manufactured before
that date to be sold at stores.
The ban involves products containing types of phthalates, plastic-softening chemicals linked by some medical
research to health problems including abnormal reproductive development in children. The CPSC is charged with
implementing the new ban. (Reuters)
Boy these phthalate cranks are a pain in the butt, aren't they?
Another costly and completely pointless recall: Irish
pork cancer scare forces British supermarkets to pull meat from shelves - Supermarkets across England,
Scotland and Wales have withdrawn Irish pork from sale after cancer-causing dioxins were found in pork products in
Ireland.
The warning was flashed to the UK after it was confirmed the poisons had been found in bacon and ham produced in
the Irish Republic.
All Irish pork products were recalled from stores in Ireland last night and shelves were cleared after the
discovery of the toxins in slaughtered pigs.
The Food Standards Agency has advised consumers not to eat pork or pork products, such as sausages, bacon, salami
and ham, which are labeled as being from the Irish Republic or Northern Ireland.
It said it was making the precautionary recommendation while it continued to investigate whether any contaminated
pork products had entered the UK market. (Daily Mail)
No one is going to be able to eat enough bacon to get chloracne from this and there is no other known human
effect from dioxin exposure.
More bent gender 'research': It's
official: Men really are the weaker sex - Evolution is being distorted by pollution, which damages genitals
and the ability to father offspring, says new study. Geoffrey Lean reports
The male gender is in danger, with incalculable consequences for both humans and wildlife, startling scientific
research from around the world reveals.
The research – to be detailed tomorrow in the most comprehensive report yet published – shows that a host of
common chemicals is feminising males of every class of vertebrate animals, from fish to mammals, including people.
Backed by some of the world's leading scientists, who say that it "waves a red flag" for humanity and
shows that evolution itself is being disrupted, the report comes out at a particularly sensitive time for
ministers. On Wednesday, Britain will lead opposition to proposed new European controls on pesticides, many of
which have been found to have "gender-bending" effects. (The Independent)
Wonder if they've ever considered people's ingestion of the substances mentioned in this next item?
Prohibition's
Second Act - Last week saw the 75th anniversary of the repeal of Prohibition. In Washington, Law Enforcement
Against Prohibition (LEAP) -- a group of former cops and drug-war veterans who have soured on America's war on
drugs -- gathered to celebrate the anniversary, and to argue for an end to America's current prohibition on
marijuana and more serious drugs.
Essentially, they believe that the war on drugs creates criminals. Richard Van Wickler, a one-time New Hampshire
county corrections superintendent, noted during a LEAP conference call last week that despite America's drug laws,
114 million Americans (out of more than 300 million) have used illegal drugs, 35 million in the last year. The law
is not much of a deterrent. (Debra J. Saunders, Rasmussen Reports)
This nonsense again: Managing our
investment in nature - While economists are developing solutions to the economic crisis, they are not
considering investment, at least so far, in the values of nature. Nature's provision of clean water, pollination,
food and fiber are discounted as free services. Even in the best of times, investments in nature conservation and
restoration get low priority. (Julia Marton-Lefèvre and Nikita Lopoukhine, IHT)
Utter tripe that it is. The imaginary value of undeveloped areas is exactly that, imaginary. The means of
making such areas valuable as are is by generating sufficient societal surplus (wealth) that people can and do
value mere aesthetics and ornamental critters rather than viewing their surrounds in terms of food, fuel and
shelter. Wealth generation leads to preservation but artificially claiming value where there is none leads to
lack of affordability and destruction through poaching, illicit harvest or whatever. Imposed
"conservation" does not and can not work.
Increased Oversight Of GMO Crops Needed: Government - WASHINGTON -
More oversight and coordination is needed among federal agencies to prevent unapproved releases of genetically
modified crops into the environment and food and feed supply, the investigative arm of the U.S. Congress said on
Friday. (Reuters)
In truth there's probably too much unnecessary oversight already, a regulatory burden encouraged by the
largest biotech firms to inhibit startups and competition.
China Delays Finishing Mammoth Water Project: Report - BEIJING -
China has postponed completing a huge water transfer project to quench its national capital's thirst, citing
stubborn pollution worries for pushing the target date back four years to 2014, official media said on Saturday.
The South-North Water Diversion scheme will channel water from the Yangtze River and its tributaries to ease
shortages across northern China, where population growth and frantic industrialization have drained dams and
underground reserves.
The main "central route" stretching 1,267 kms (787 miles) from the Danjiangkou Dam in central Hubei
province to Beijing was due to be finished in 2010. (Reuters)
December 5, 2008
Green-on-Green Violence - The activist group
Environmental Defense got a taste of what it used to dish out this week when its Washington, D.C., offices were
invaded by another green group, the Global Justice Ecology Project. (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
Does
Obama Need Congress To Act On Climate Change? - What happens if Congress can't—or won't—pass a climate
bill in the next two years? Does that mean Obama will just have to abandon his promise to regulate greenhouse-gas
emissions? Well, no, not necessarily. As we've discussed before, and as Marc Ambinder noted yesterday, thanks to a
2007 Supreme Court ruling, the EPA technically has the option of using the existing Clean Air Act to regulate CO2
from power plants and large industrial facilities. Here's Ambinder's take: (New Republic)
The only real question is why would anyone do so by any means?
Cap,
trade and deal - Barack Obama’s climate-change proposals may have widespread support now, but how long can
it last? (Adam Chamberlain and John Vellone, Financial Post)
Texas Worries About a
Carbon Cap - Texas leads the nation in wind energy, but it is also is the largest producer and consumer of
energy — the latter largely due both to its size and to the presence of big industries like oil, gas and
chemicals.
So when it comes to potential greenhouse gas regulation – something that President-elect Barack Obama says he
will support — there are vast rifts of opinion. (New York Times)
Some Carbon Candor - A climate
guru rebukes his mates on cap and trade.
Liberal interest groups, think tanks, lobbyists, bloggers and other nuisances are inundating the incoming Obama
Administration with advice, but James Hansen recently managed to say something interesting. Namely, the famous
NASA scientist had the nerve to expose some of the global-warming fantasies widespread among children and
politicians.
No, the spiritual leader of the climate-change movement hasn't recanted. Global warming threatens "not simply
the Earth, but the fate of all its species, including humanity," he writes in his manifesto, which is tame by
Mr. Hansen's normal rhetorical standards. (He likes to compare carbon to the Holocaust: "those coal trains
will be death trains -- no less gruesome than if they were boxcars headed to crematoria.")
But Mr. Hansen also had the honesty to follow his convictions to their logical conclusion, while reproaching his
followers -- President-elect Obama among them -- for not doing the same. To wit, Mr. Hansen endorses a straight
carbon tax as the only "honest, clear and effective" way to reduce emissions, with the revenues rebated
in their entirety to consumers on a per-capita basis. "Not one dime should go to Washington for politicians
to pick winners," he writes. (Wall Street Journal)
Europe cool toward faster action on
climate change - Poznan, Poland - The European Union reacted coolly Wednesday to calls by poor and island
nations to take bolder action against global warming, saying such an effort may be "very costly." The
conflict is one of many playing out at this year's main UN climate conference, where some 190 countries are trying
to pave the way for a global deal next year to curb emissions of so-called greenhouse gases. (DPA)
Kevin Rudd cools on carbon
targets - FEDERAL cabinet is finalising a cautious emissions trading scheme offering higher compensation to
big trade-exposed polluters and a "soft" start in pollution-reduction targets.
With concern growing in the Rudd cabinet about the emissions trading scheme's potential to exacerbate already
rising unemployment, particularly in crucial marginal regional seats, the target range for the regime to be
released on Monday week is widely expected to be between 5 per cent and 15 per cent by 2020. But the emissions
trading white paper will tie Australian emissions reduction targets to the ambition of next year's Copenhagen
agreement on cutting global greenhouse gas emissions.
After months of furious lobbying from key industries, including LNG, cement and steel, the Government will offer
significant changes to its original formula offering wider compensation to trade-exposed emissions-intensive
industries to ameliorate corporate concern about jobs and investment moving offshore.
Senior sources also say the Government's strategy is to negotiate the scheme through the Senate next year with the
Coalition, rather than the Greens and independents, meaning its final impact is likely to be even softer when an
amended version finally starts in 2010. (The Australian) | Rudd
dobbed himself into dilemma (Peter Hartcher, Sydney Morning Herald)
Don't 'soften' it -- scrap the stupid idea altogether!
Under the Weather: Internal Report Says U.N.
Climate Agency Rife With Bad Practices - As more than 10,000 delegates and observers gather in Poznan, Poland,
to discuss the next phase in the battle against "climate change," a U.N. agency at the center of that
hoopla badly needs to do some in-house weather-proofing.
The Poznan conference, seen as a major step toward a negotiated successor to the Kyoto Accord on greenhouse gases,
is taking place until Dec. 12 under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC), a subsidiary of the World Meteorological Organization, a global association of scientific weather
forecasters.
But the WMO, the $80 million U.N. front-line agency in the climate change struggle, and the source for much of the
world's information in the global atmosphere and water supply, has serious management problems of its own, despite
its rapidly expanding global ambitions.
The international agency has been sharply criticized by a U.N. inspection unit in a confidential report obtained
by FOX News, for, among other things, haphazard budget practices, deeply flawed organizational procedures, and no
effective oversight by the 188 nations that formally make up its membership and dole out its funds. (George
Russell, FoxNews.com)
Time
for the BBC to Chill Out - This morning I awoke to a truly hilarious (if inadvertent) moment on BBC Radio
4’s ‘Today’ programme [‘Listen Again’ from 07.17 am onwards]. There was good old Roger Harrabin sounding
like some doleful Eeyore braying on about how terrible it was that Italy, Poland, France, and all the rest were
likely to scupper the EU’s efforts to save us all from “dangerous climate change”, only to be followed by an
item from a poor soul who was stuck up North somewhere because of heavy and unseasonal snow. The cognitive
dissonance was deafening, yet none of the presenters flinched, nor had the wit to make a comment, such is the
BBC’s increasing deafness on the subject of climate change. (The Clamour Of The Times)
Does the Senate have to ratify these? Statement
by Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. at the EcoPartnerships Signing During the U.S. – China Strategic Economic
Dialogue - Beijing – Today we mark the beginning of what I believe will be a very powerful model for
identifying, developing and implementing energy and environmental innovations that will benefit both the American
and Chinese people.
We are here to witness the signing of 7 EcoPartnerships – voluntary, cooperative partnerships between U.S. and
Chinese entities including local, state or provincial government-to-government partnerships, and partnerships
among businesses, universities and non-profits. By partnering at the sub-national level, ideas can be tested in
targeted areas before broad introduction as a new model for sustainable growth, based on energy and environmental
innovations. (Treasury Press Release)
The Shearing of the Sheep: The Grotesque UN Climate Conference in Poznan
Dec. 1-12, 2008 - While large parts of Northern Europe are covered by massive snow – beginning at an
unusually early time already in October – a tragi-comic event is taking place in Poland. (Euro-Med)
Next year will be
critical year for action on climate change, UN officials say - 4 December 2008 – With negotiations on a
successor pact to the Kyoto Protocol, which mandates targets for slashing greenhouse gas emissions, expected to
wrap up in December 2009, next year will be the year of climate change, United Nations officials said today in New
York. (UN News)
Climate
Change Reduction or ‘Green Global Welfare’? - The idea seems simple enough. The rich world would pay the
poor world to save a type of natural commodity from which we all benefit – trees.
Forests and jungles absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, which is stored in trees. Cutting trees down
releases CO2 and triggers the emission of additional greenhouse gases from denuded soils. Forest loss and land
degradation could be responsible for 20 percent of the planet-warming gases attributable to human activities, some
experts suggest.
That has made the question of what to do about forests central to talks underway this week in Poznan, Poland, that
aim to shape a new global agreement to fight global warming. Scientists and environmentalists want mechanisms to
reward the developing world for saving its forests incorporated into any such treaty. (New York Times)
It's always about the money: Rich, Poor In Dispute
Over Rainforest Cash - POZNAN - Brazil ruled out on Thursday letting rich countries offset their greenhouse
gas emissions by helping to save the Amazon rain forest, an idea under active discussion by the European Union.
Indigenous peoples attending United Nations-led climate talks in Poznan protested that they had no chance of
seeing such carbon cash, and appealed instead for money first to root out corruption and cement their land rights.
(Reuters)
Are
There Long-Term Trends in The Start Of Freeze-Up And Melt Of Arctic Sea Ice? - The use of Arctic sea ice
coverage as a climate metric has received wide science and media coverage. This issue is motivated by the recent
large reduction in late summer areal coverage (e.g. see the data on the excellent website The Cryosphere Today).
There is another sea ice metric to look at, however, and that is the date of the year of the minimum and maximum
sea ice coverage. With the addition of well-mixed greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, we should expect the start
of the freeze-up in the late summer/early fall to be later and the start of the melt in the late winter/early
spring to be earlier. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Point of No Return for the Arctic
Climate? - Temperatures in the Arctic are rising much faster than elsewhere in the world. Researchers now say
it may be the result of a dramatic shift in global climate patterns. If they are right, ice at the North Pole may
soon be a thing of the past. (Der Spiegel)
Cave's climate clues show ancient empires declined during
dry spell -- The decline of the Roman and Byzantine empires in the Eastern Mediterranean more than 1,400 years
ago may have been driven by unfavorable climate changes.
Based on chemical signatures in a piece of calcite from a cave near Jerusalem, a team of American and Israeli
geologists pieced together a detailed record of the area's climate from roughly 200 B.C. to 1100 A.D. Their
analysis, to be reported in an upcoming issue of the journal Quaternary Research, reveals increasingly dry weather
from 100 A.D. to 700 A.D. that coincided with the fall of both Roman and Byzantine rule in the region. (PhysOrg.com)
Obama's Environmental Test - Two down,
one to go.
You might think now that Barack Obama has staffed his economic and security teams, the hard choices are over. But
he has one more doozy of a decision to make. And the worry is that his picks for that final, crucial team -- those
overseeing energy and environmental policy -- will undo any smart moves the president-elect has made so far.
It isn't yet clear Team Obama understands that it doesn't have the luxury of making a mistake here. Energy is the
engine of, and inextricably linked to, the American economy. Environmental policies and regulations that punish
energy markets will only deliver a further economic hit.
In the process, this will damage Mr. Obama's own goals. He has picked an economic team that has already
successfully discouraged him from proceeding immediately with any tax hikes. Good. But an ill-crafted
cap-and-trade program that dramatically escalates energy costs is the same as a giant tax hike. Mr. Obama is
promising to save or create 2.5 million jobs. Fabulous. But drowning industries in exorbitant energy prices will
only encourage further overseas flight. If the president-elect thinks Detroit is a problem, just wait for the
impact an upward march in electricity prices would have on, say, the manufacturing South. (Wall Street Journal)
Global
Warming Update: CNN Drops Science Unit and Miles O'Brien - Climate alarmists won't have Miles O'Brien to
spread global warming hysteria on CNN anymore as the network has decided to eliminate its science and technology
unit.
As reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Thursday, this "will result in the loss of seven jobs
including veteran space correspondent Miles O’Brien." (NewsBusters)
Barack's Windfall Reversal -
Here comes the 'change' part of his Administration.
One of Barack Obama's emerging political qualities is how casually he has been dumping the ballast of his campaign
promises. The latest lousy policy to go over the side is a windfall profits tax on U.S. oil companies. (Wall
Street Journal)
Oil Change - In the face of
plummeting oil prices, President-elect Obama abandons resurrecting the windfall profits tax on oil companies. It
was a bad idea at any price. Now, will he also face reality and let them drill? (IBD)
Energy
Goals a Moving Target for States - In hopes of slowing global warming and creating “green jobs,” Congress
and the incoming administration may soon impose a mandate that the nation get 10 or 15 percent of its electricity
from renewable sources within a few years.
Yet the experience of states that have adopted similar goals suggests that passing that requirement could be a lot
easier than achieving it. The record so far is decidedly mixed: some states appear to be on track to meet energy
targets, but others have fallen behind on the aggressive goals they set several years ago.
The state goals have contributed to rapid growth of wind turbines and solar power stations in some areas, notably
the West, but that growth has come on a minuscule base. Nationwide, the hard numbers provide a sobering
counterpoint to the green-energy enthusiasm sweeping Washington. (New York Times)
Energy saboteurs and intimidators still busy: Bank
cuts coal loans as Washington eases rules - SAN FRANCISCO - Bank of America Corp will sharply cut lending to
coal mining companies that take the tops off mountains, following pressure from groups that call the practice an
environmental hazard. (Reuters)
And allegedly profit-making enterprises are still yielding to extortion. Appeasement never works. This
is just another way enviro cranks are inhibiting society's energy supplies.
Meanwhile: German Environment Minister Plans Talks
Over Power Financing - BERLIN - German Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel has invited leading European banks
to Berlin for a summit to discuss financing problems facing the green power industry, his ministry said on
Thursday. (Reuters)
Ever thought pretend power has trouble attracting finance because it is worthless?
Yet another stupid capitulation: Malaysia Chides
HSBC Move To Curb Palm Oil - KUALA LUMPUR - Banking giant HSBC's decision to curb lending to oil palm projects
in Malaysia is misguided and will hurt the bank more than it will hurt Malaysia's palm industry, the country's
commodities minister said.
HSBC, under pressure from environmental groups to brush up its green credentials, said on Tuesday it would cut
ties with a third of forestry clients such as palm oil, soy and timber companies. (Reuters)
Russian
gas supplies to EU could be cut in Ukraine row - Vladimir Putin has threatened to cut gas supplies to Ukraine
raising the prospect of a winter energy crisis in Western Europe. (Daily Telegraph)
Recycling
shipped to China to be burnt as cheap fuel - Recycling is being shipped to China where it is being burnt as
cheap fuel, according to a new report calling for a whole new approach to disposing of waste in the UK. (Daily
Telegraph)
Biofuels No Threat To Africa Food Safety: Institute -
VIENNA - Biofuel crops are not a threat to food security but a potential boon for Africa where some regions could
be as successful as Asian palm oil giants, an industry expert said on Thursday.
But Werner Koerbitz, director of the Austrian Biofuels Institute, said the infrastructure and political will were
desperately needed.
He said countries particularly along the west African coast, such as Ghana, Nigeria and the Ivory Coast showed
great natural potential to become major biofuel producers.
"Those countries could be as rich as Malaysia," he said, referring to the world's second biggest
palm-oil producer. (Reuters)
They already have resources and tradable commodities and yet they are impoverished nations -- due to civil
strife and bad governance, lack of property rights and virtual absence of the rule of law. Diverting agriculture
and effort to the production of feel-good fuels to absolve misguided European eco-consciences is plain stupid.
EU Ends Biofuel Battle To Get Green Energy Deal -
BRUSSELS - The European Union agreed on Thursday a series of ways to promote green energy after resolving a
long-running battle over biofuels.
But Italy would not drop its demand to review the legislation in 2014, preventing the European Union from signing
off on a deal to get 20 percent of the bloc's energy from renewable sources by 2020. (Reuters)
Chocolate cake
and an important message for bariatric surgery patients - The writers of House MD on Fox-TV did a public
service last night. Unlike most television shows, House continues to punch through popular stereotypes about fat
people and take on obesity sacred cows with that cutting, impudent honesty that only Dr. Gregory House can get
away with. Last night’s drama, weaved a difficult story line with subplots of humor and sexual tension and even
medical ethics. Simultaneously, it brought an important educational message to bariatric surgery patients and
medical professionals that no other media has dared to touch.
Like all entertaining television, everything on House moves faster than life and teeters at the brink of reality.
But while the diagnostic investigations are sensational, the underlying message last night was genuine. (Junkfood
Science)
Apple or pear shape is not main culprit to heart woes --
it's liver fat - For years, pear-shaped people who carry weight in the thighs and backside have been told they
are at lower risk for high blood pressure and heart disease than apple-shaped people who carry fat in the abdomen.
But new findings from nutrition researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggest
body-shape comparisons don't completely explain risk.
In two studies, they report excess liver fat appears to be the real key to insulin resistance, cholesterol
abnormalities and other problems that contribute to diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Having too much fat
stored in the liver is known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. (Washington University School of Medicine)
Environmentalists Accuse Ankara of
Early Start on Mega Dam - Turkey's Ilisu dam project in ancient Mesopotamia was already controversial due to
the cultural sites it would flood. Now, though, environmentalists say construction has gone ahead in violation of
conditions set by project-backers Germany, Austria and Switzerland. (Der Spiegel)
I wish my government could be accused of early starts on most anything but particularly dams.
Panel Seeks
Changes in E.P.A. Reviews - The Environmental Protection Agency must revise its approach to assessing
environmental health hazards and other risks, because current practices hinder useful and timely regulation, an
expert panel of The National Research Council says. (New York Times)
Actually the department needs to realize it exists to benefit humans rather than the misanthropic crap it
chooses to indulge. The path to the best possible environment is development and particularly wealth generation
for only a society generating a surplus beyond the needs of all its citizens can indulge such pure luxury goods
as aesthetics and protected playgrounds for critters providing neither food and/or fiber nor useful work
function (transport, animal powered whatever...). Every impoverished society views their environs from the
perspective of food, fuel and shelter, they have no choice.
Sadly the EPA, a nice if naive idea, is awash with natur über alles greenies going exactly the wrong
way about trying to achieve their aim of "protecting" nature. There are some six billion people on
this planet who will do whatever it takes to survive which is why we need to maximize wealth generation
and productivity if we want to indulge such ornaments as wild spaces and wild critters. The real function of the
EPA can only be achieved by facilitating human productivity and wealth generation and yet they persist in their
wrongheaded obstructionism. Too stupid for words, isn't it?
New EU Recycling Laws Worry Manufacturers - BRUSSELS
- Electronics manufacturers will have to collect and recycle nearly two thirds of the electrical goods they sell
in the European Union, the EU's executive said on Wednesday.
The proposal angered producers, who said it bore little relation to the real world, where people often pass on old
televisions and computers to friends, families, charities or schools, making them impossible to keep track of.
The EU's Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive seeks to minimize the incineration or dumping in
land-fill sites of household appliances. (Reuters)
Why? As
More Eat Meat, a Bid to Cut Emissions - STERKSEL, the Netherlands — The cows and pigs dotting these flat
green plains in the southern Netherlands create a bucolic landscape. But looked at through the lens of greenhouse
gas accounting, they are living smokestacks, spewing methane emissions into the air.
That is why a group of farmers-turned-environmentalists here at a smelly but impeccably clean research farm have a
new take on making a silk purse from a sow’s ear: They cook manure from their 3,000 pigs to capture the methane
trapped within it, and then use the gas to make electricity for the local power grid.
Rising in the fields of the environmentally conscious Netherlands, the Sterksel project is a rare example of
fledgling efforts to mitigate the heavy emissions from livestock. But much more needs to be done, scientists say,
as more and more people are eating more meat around the world. (New York Times)
Wild
deer should be culled to protect wildlife, experts claim - A cull of wild deer is needed to to prevent the
destruction of Britain's most protected woodland, experts have claimed. (Daily Telegraph)
Ghana's 'miracle': Logging underwater forests for exotic
timber - Ghana, which is running short of forests to chop down, is about to turn to the dead trees underneath
its Lake Volta as a new source of exotic timber, one of its top export earners. (AFP)
Neither miraculous nor new, just exploitation of an available resource not that it is economic to do so.
EU Approves Genetically Modified Soybean For Import -
BRUSSELS - The European Union has authorized imports of a genetically modified (GM) soybean type for sale across
its 27 national markets for the next 10 years, the European Commission said on Thursday.
Developed and marketed by Monsanto, the soybean is destined to be imported for use in food and animal feed, not
for growing. It is a second-generation GM product known by its code number MON 89788 and commercially as Roundup
RReady2Yield.
The soybean is designed to resist glyphosate Roundup Ready herbicides and produce increased yields for farmers.
(Reuters)
December 4, 2008
They're certainly getting the hang of this game: Obama
climate goals not enough - China, India - POZNAN, Poland — U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's goals for
curbing greenhouse gases to 2020 are inadequate to fight global warming, Chinese and Indian delegates told Reuters
at U.N. climate talks on Wednesday.
Developing nations welcomed Obama's plan for tougher goals than President George W. Bush but said Obama's target
of cutting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions back to 1990 levels by 2020 was not enough to avoid dangerous global
warming.
"It's more ambitious than President Bush but it is not enough to achieve the urgent, long-term goal of
greenhouse gas reductions," Tsinghua University's He Jiankun, of the Chinese delegation, said on the
sidelines of the Dec. 1-12 talks.
U.S. emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, are running about 14 percent above 1990 levels and Bush's plans
had foreseen emissions rising and only peaking in 2025. Obama also plans to cut emissions to 80 percent below 1990
levels by 2050.
"It's not ambitious enough considering the Kyoto Protocol targets, but given the eight-year Bush
administration it's progress," said Dinesh Patnaik, a director at the Indian Foreign Ministry. (Reuters)
Senate Democrats will pack plenty of
muscle - WASHINGTON - Senate Democrats will be able to do plenty over the next two years -- despite falling
just short of their goal of winning a majority big enough to end Republican procedural roadblocks.
Senate Democrats will have the muscle, with the help of a few moderate Republicans, to pass a crush of bills,
including ones to stimulate the economy, ensure equal pay for women, ease global warming, lower prescription drug
prices for the elderly and change course in the Iraq war. (Reuters)
The Cost Of Green - Stimulating
the economy with massive new investments in "green" infrastructure seems to be a popular idea, and
President-elect Obama has made it a centerpiece of his program. Will it work? We doubt it. (IBD)
Cap
and burn Canada - North American cap-and-trade carbon controls, supported by all parties in Ottawa, could
wreck Canada (Aldyen Donnelly, Financial Post)
GAO Unable to Verify
Effectiveness of International Carbon Markets - WASHINGTON – The Government Accountability Office today
released its report about the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme and international carbon offset scheme,
the Clean Development Mechanism. GAO found that the available information on the Emissions Trading Scheme could
not substantiate either emissions reductions or clear economic benefits, and that negative economic effects could
occur if the European Union further reduced emissions allowances. (Committee on Energy & Commerce)
Um, no: Professor
sheds light for climate change sceptics - THE sun is a powerful player in the planet's climate as the energy
it sends to Earth waxes and wanes. But the sun is not driving recent global warming as climate change sceptics
claim.
That is the message from atmospheric scientist Marvin Geller of Stony Brook University in New York state, a
keynote speaker at this week's Australian Institute of Physics national congress in Adelaide.
"Solar physicists and climate scientists agree that while the sun affects climate (they) cannot account for
the last several decades' warming trend without including human influences," he said. (The Australian)
We don't understand it so it must be people :)
Seriously though, skeptics do not claim the sun drives recent warming -- since there
hasn't been any.
Moreover, carbon dioxide skeptics tend to be rather more realistic about our ability to determine current and
past temperatures, realizing we have no indication of anything out of the ordinary occurring lately.
Finally, skeptics are also more open to alternate hypotheses, especially since Svensmark et al demonstrated
a mechanism for solar effects to be dramatically amplified by influencing cloud formation and planetary
albedo, something we can not yet quantify within a couple of percent (try the calculator in this
page and see how adjusting the albedo value up or down 1% while leaving other values unchanged delivers
global mean temperature changes far greater than we believe have occurred over the entire industrial era).
Geller is being quite disingenuous suggesting TSI (total solar irradiance) is the whole or even a
particularly significant part of the climate story.
Scientist
warns against overselling climate change - Climate change forecasters should admit that they cannot predict
how global warming will affect individual countries, a leading physicist has said. (Daily Telegraph)
And yet he believes models about gorebull warming... go figure!
Plumbing new depths: New U.N. Pact May Be Needed For Climate
Victims: WWF - POZNAN, Poland - The world may need a new U.N. pact to compensate victims of climate change or
risk a tangle of billion-dollar lawsuits linked to heatwaves, droughts and rising seas, a study said on Wednesday.
The report, commissioned by the WWF UK environmental group, said the world already had compensation deals for
accidents from nuclear power, oil spills, or even objects launched into space. But there were no U.N. schemes for
damage from climate change.
"The likelihood of legal action against major-emitting countries is increasing," according to the
37-page study of options written by two climate lawyers. (Reuters)
Climate lawyers!
There's gold in
green: profiting from climate change - Imagine an unpopular, impotent, and fragile UK Government, trying to
make political capital out of a looming crisis. To avoid being embarrassed by criticism of its shallow policies,
it appoints an independent panel of experts, to which it defers controversial decisions. Now imagine that the
panel proposes measures from which its members and their associates will directly benefit.
It couldn't happen here, you may think. Scandal and resignations would surely follow. Who could possibly allow
vested interests to profit from the legislation they are instrumental in creating? (Ben Pile, The Register)
Uh-huh... Companies Warned to Go Green or Go
Under - NEW YORK, Dec 3 - If companies in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector do not implement
sustainable environmental strategies, their earnings could be cut in half by 2018, according to a future scenario
analysis by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and global consulting firm A.T. Kearney released on Tuesday.
"The vast majority of companies are only beginning to realise that the financial impacts of climate change
will be so severe that classical cost-reduction efforts will not be sufficient," A.T. Kearney partner Daniel
Mahler told IPS.
The future scenario, entitled "Ecoflation", concludes that physical climate change, water scarcity,
deforestation and climate change policies could significantly increase the price of commodities, packaging,
manufacturing and logistics. (IPS)
All this from gorebull warming that isn't happening? What a crock. The only real 'ecoflation' stems from the
idiot policies of those seeking to "address" the phantom menace.
An
international court to prevent climate change. Now that is a good idea. - Stephen Hockman QC—which, if you
read Rumpole, you know means queer customer—is a European (I can’t say Englishman, because an Englishman would
not voluntarily cede his country’s sovereignty to a foreign body) who is proposing to create an International
Court of Environmental Justice, whose purpose will be to “punish states that fail to protect wildlife and
prevent climate change.”
Isn’t that nice? (William M Briggs, Statistician)
Excuse me, do you speak climate?
- Oh Deah. The BINGOs are at odds with the TUNGOs and the RINGOs over the NAMAs and the NAPAs.
RFUK is concerned about what REDD is going to do to PAM.
But at least the SIDS are keen on LULUCF.
If you thought the science behind global warming was dauntingly complex and believed "low albedo" was
something to do with sex drive - it means poor reflection of sunlight - then the UN climate talks in Poznan are
not for you.
Running until December 12, the negotiations for concluding a new worldwide climate pact gather more than 10,000
policymakers, industrialists and campaigners.
And they are awash in alphabet soup. (AFP)
Czech President: EU's Outspoken Global
Warming Doubter - Czech President Vaclav Klaus, one of the most prominent climate change doubters, is about to
get a new platform: the EU presidency. Others in the bloc worry that he could stall important climate talks next
year. (Deutsche Welle)
FACTBOX-What Asia's top players want from U.N.
climate talks - Dec 4 - Nearly 190 nations are meeting in Poland as part of U.N. talks to hammer out a broader
pact to fight global warming.
Asia is a crucial part of the negotiations, representing half of humanity and a large and rapidly growing share of
the greenhouse gas pollution blamed for warming the planet.
Following are what the five main players in Asia want from the U.N.-led talks on a more ambitious pact to replace
the Kyoto Protocol from 2013. (Reuters)
Polish Coal Miners at Center of EU Climate
Tussle - European Union leaders meet this week in Poland to discuss fighting climate change. But as the EU
seeks to slash greenhouse gas emissions, Polish coal miners are worried -- and defiant.
Coal provides 94 percent of Poland's energy and some 117,000 jobs, a fact that's come into focus as the country
prepares to host global talks on a new climate-saving pact.
"Everyone wants to live in healthy air," said Waclaw Czerkawski, deputy head of Poland's Trade Union of
Miners. "But you have to find some kind of balance, and you can't do that at the expense of the economy,
industry and jobs." (Deutsche Welle)
European metal workers protest EU's
climate policy - BRUSSELS, Dec. 2 -- About 11,000 workers from the steel industry in European countries
gathered on Tuesday in Brussels to protest the European Union's climate change policy which they fear might make
them lose their jobs. (Xinhua)
Global Climate Change Logjam - Three reasons why global
climate change negotiations will go nowhere (Ronald Bailey, Reason)
Fewer tickets on the gravy train? National
rejects expert advice? - Yesterday I was informed that a number of officials have been dumped from the New
Zealand Government delegation to the climate change talks in Poznan, Poland (Frog Blog)
Oh dear... Proposal
Ties Economic Stimulus to Energy Savings - WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama and leaders in Congress
are fashioning a plan to pour billions of dollars into a jobs program to jolt the economy and lay the groundwork
for a more energy-efficient one.
The details and cost of the so-called green-jobs program are still unclear, but a senior Obama aide, speaking on
the condition of anonymity to discuss a work in progress, said it would probably include the weatherizing of
hundreds of thousands of homes, the installation of “smart meters” to monitor and reduce home energy use, and
billions of dollars in grants to state and local governments for mass transit and infrastructure projects.
The green component of the much larger stimulus plan would cost at least $15 billion a year, and perhaps
considerably more, depending on how the projects were defined, aides working on the package said.
During the campaign, Mr. Obama supported a measure to address global warming by capping carbon emissions while
allowing companies to buy and trade pollution permits. He said he would devote $150 billion of the revenue from
the sale of those permits over 10 years to energy efficiency and alternative energy projects to wean the nation
from fuels that are the main causes of the heating the atmosphere. (New York Times)
Uh-huh... more of that, uh, 'settled' science: Arctic Tundra
Emits Methane Even In Winter - LONDON - The arctic tundra emits the same amount of methane in winter as in
the warmer months, a surprising finding that bolsters understanding of how greenhouse gases interact with
nature, researchers said on Wednesday.
Scientists have long known that wetlands produce large amounts of methane and had thought it unlikely that
greenhouse gases escaped from beneath frozen tundra, said Torben Christensen, a biogeochemist at Lund University
in Sweden.
"Mother Nature is showing us something that is really surprising," Christensen, who led the study
published in the journal Nature, said in a telephone interview.
"Nobody would expect to have loads of gas seeping out from a frozen environment." (Reuters) [em added]
So much for the alleged critical feedback of increasing methane emissions from warming tundra -- something
now apparently not temperature dependant.
Understanding the daily variation - For over two
centuries, meteorologists were puzzled by the observation that atmospheric pressure in the tropics peaks at 10
a.m. and 10 p.m. nearly every day. In the late 1960s, a theory was proposed that these surface pressure variations
result from waves that are generated by the sun's heating of the upper atmosphere. (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Greenhouse gas emissions increase in US
- The amount of U.S. greenhouse gases flowing into the atmosphere, mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil
fuels, increased last year by 1.4 percent after a decline in 2006, the Energy Department reported Wednesday.
The report said carbon dioxide, the leading pollution linked to global warming, rose by 1.3 percent in 2007 as
people used more coal, oil and natural gas because of a colder winter and more electricity during a warmer summer.
Half of the country's electricity is generated by coal-burning power plants. (Associated Press)
Are Rising CO2 Levels And The Increase In Atlantic
Major Hurricanes Since 1995 Related? - The official end of the 2008 Atlantic basin hurricane season occurred
last Sunday (November 30). This year was an active and destructive season. My colleague, Phil Klotzbach and I were
very happy to see that our forecasts for this year’s activity worked out well, as did NOAA’s seasonal
hurricane forecast. See our website for a 53-page summary of this season’s activity. Although this is my 25th
year of making these seasonal forecasts, Klotzbach should get most of the credit for the success of this year’s
forecast. (Dr. William Gray, Icecap)
Uh-oh... Rethinking
Observed Warming - The United Nations Climate Change Conference is underway this week in Poznan, Poland, and
literally thousands of folks have convened and reinforced the notion that the buildup of greenhouse gases has
caused substantial warming in recent decades and that left unchecked, the continued buildup will undoubtedly cause
significant warming in the decades to come. Believe it or not, it is possible that aspects of the traditional
greenhouse gas explanation could be largely wrong, and if you think we are crazy, let’s visit an article just
published in the prestigious journal Climate Dynamics. (WCR)
... this is a major problem for the enhanced greenhouse crowd because their entire supporting argument has
been that only their version of increased forcing from increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (and equivalent
gases) suitably drives models to emulate observations and that, therefore, enhanced greenhouse is the cause. Now
a model suite has been driven to similar emulation without enhanced greenhouse and thus the enhanced
greenhouse hypothesis, already circling the drain, disappears down the gurgler, so to speak.
UN
Data shows ‘Warming has Stopped!’ – Climate Fears Called ‘Hogwash’ – ‘Global Carbon Tax’ Urged
Aussie Scientist Says ‘No relationship between CO2 and temperature’
Read Part Two of this Report here:
Washington DC - The bad news for global warming alarmists just keeps rolling in. Below is a very small sampling of
very inconvenient developments for Gore, the United Nations, and the mainstream media. Peer-reviewed studies,
analyses, and prominent scientists continue to speak out to refute climate fears. The majority of data presented
below is from just the past week. Also see: U.S. Senate Minority Report: “Over 400 Prominent Scientists (and
rapidly growing) Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007” & ‘Consensus’ On Man-Made Global
Warming Collapses in 2008 - July 18, 2008 & An August 2007 report detailed how proponents of man-made global
warming fears enjoy a monumental funding advantage over skeptical scientists. (EPW)
Cleveland-area TV
meteorologists disagree with prevailing attitude about climate change - They will tell you when the skies
might rain or snow in fickle Northeast Ohio, when to bundle up the kids in a cold snap and when to make weekend
plans if steady sunshine spans the five-day forecast.
They also will tell you that human-caused global warming is hogwash.
They're your local TV meteorologists. (Plain Dealer)
Waste
heat could warm the earth? Perhaps it has already started. - Excerpt of an article from the New Scientist, 01
December 2008 by Mark Buchanan (h/t to Richard Hegarty)
EVEN if we turn to clean energy to reduce carbon emissions, the planet might carry on warming anyway due to the
heat released into the environment by our ever-increasing consumption of energy.
That’s the contentious possibility raised by Nick Cowern and Chihak Ahn of the School of Electrical, Electronic
and Computer Engineering at Newcastle University, UK. They argue that human energy consumption could begin to
contribute significantly to global warming a century from now.
Cowern and Ahn considered an emissions scenario proposed by James Hansen of the Goddard Institute for Space
Studies in New York, and others. Under this scenario, which envisages greenhouse gases being cut significantly
through phasing out coal over the next 40 years, Cowern and Ahn calculate that the greenhouse effect will start to
diminish by 2050, stabilising the climate. (Watts Up With That?)
China Braces For Snow And Sandstorms - BEIJING - Temperatures are
expected to drop by up to 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) across most of China in coming days, bringing
snow in the northeast and sandstorms in the west, state media said.
The state weather observatory launched a cold weather emergency response plan on Wednesday to tackle disasters
after record cold and snow brought down power lines and paralyzed much of the usually mild south earlier this
year.
National and 23 provincial meteorological departments have been ordered to be on high alert and closely monitor
the cold current and snowstorms, Xinhua news agency said. (Reuters)
“On
The Misconception That Planting Trees Worsens Global Warming” by Lianhong Gu - The following is a guest
weblog by Dr. Lianhong Gu of the Terrestrial Water - Carbon Cycles Group Environmental Sciences Division at Oak
Ridge National Laboratory: (Climate Science)
Richard Courtney's critique to U.S. MAYORS CLIMATE PROTECTION
AGREEMENT - You will find another of Richard Courtney critique's at the foot of this article. Great reading
Richard and thank you. (Co2sceptic)
Low-carbon Britain: a pointless
distraction - The UK's new climate change plan suggests we make considerable sacrifices for little practical
benefit.
The UK’s official Committee on Climate Change unveiled its first report on Monday, detailing why and how Britain
must make massive cuts in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over the next few decades. But achieving the goals set
out in Building a Low-Carbon Economy will be expensive, a distraction from other priorities, and quite possibly
futile. (Rob Lyons, sp!ked)
State responds to Sunflower lawsuit - The
Kansas attorney general’s office is asking a federal court to dismiss Sunflower Electric Power Corp.’s lawsuit
against the state for denying an air quality permit it needs to build two coal-fired power plants in southwest
Kansas.
Sunflower filed the lawsuit last month asking a U.S. District judge to block the state from denying the permit.
(Associated Press)
Effort
would make St. Louis clean coal focal point - ST. LOUIS -- Two major coal companies and one of the Midwest's
largest utilities are combining with Washington University to try and make St. Louis the nation's center for clean
coal research and education.
Arch Coal and Peabody Energy are based in St. Louis and both have coal mining operations in Wyoming. The utility
company Ameren Corp. also is based in St. Louis. Chief executive officers from those companies and Washington
University Chancellor Mark Wrighton on Tuesday announced formation of the Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization.
"Despite these difficult financial times, the university and these lead corporate sponsors realize that the
investment in such research will benefit the region and the world in the long run," Wrighton said at a news
conference at the university. "The knowledge and technology we will be able to create together will over time
mean lower costs to customers and global environmental improvement."
Wrighton said the university has dedicated more than $60 million over the past year in education and research on
energy, the environment and sustainability. A new building is expected to open in 2010. (Associated Press)
EPA to gut mountaintop mining rule protecting streams -
The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday approved a last-minute rule change by the Bush administration that
will allow coal companies to bury streams under the rocks leftover from mining. (McClatchy-Tribune)
France Proposes EU Coal Compromise - POZNAN - France wants a slew
of exemptions to cut carbon costs for east European power producers and heavy industry, as the holder of the EU
presidency tries to nail agreement on wider climate goals, a draft paper shows.
The proposals in a paper seen by Reuters, dated December 2, would halve the cost of carbon targets for utilities
in east Europe compared with their western counterparts and exempt companies vulnerable to global competition.
(Reuters)
Dutch Court Annuls Nuon Power Plant Permit - AMSTERDAM - A Dutch
court annulled a permit for Dutch utility Nuon to build a multi-fuel power plant in the port of Eemshaven on
Wednesday, after environmental groups raised concerns about its construction.
Nuon shareholders approved the 1.5 billion euros ($1.90 billion) project last year, which aimed to build a plant
in the port that could generate electricity from coal, gas and biomass, with a capacity of 1,200 megawatts.
But environmental groups including Greenpeace as well as some local residents opposed a permit awarded to Nuon by
the province of Groningen and took the matter to court.
"This judgment should make investors in coal power stations think twice," said Rolf Schipper from
Greenpeace Netherlands in a statement.
Nuon was not immediately available for comment. (Reuters)
Maybe they should try rubbing two enviros together...
Nuke
Global Warming - It is high time that the green axis of antagonism stop its obsessive obstructions of future
growth and prosperity. Environmentalists' fascination with unproven and inadequate alternative energies must give
way to massive expansion in nuclear power plants -- solar power operates at 25% efficiency on an annual basis,
while nuclear power operates at 85% efficiency. Perhaps as many as 150 new nuclear power plants would be built in
the US in this century. (Paul Taylor, FrontPageMagazine.com)
Palm oil offers no green solution - A major
international study says palm oil plantations reduce plant and animal diversity, and do little to reduce carbon
emissions.
Researchers say tropical forests are increasingly cleared to make way for palm oil crops, leading to a reduction
in habitats for many rare species. (BBC News)
Maybe, caring most
for those with HIV/AIDS looks different than we believe - It’s easy to mean well and get behind popular
preventive health programs that sound like they save lives and are in everyone’s best interests. But no matter
how popular or intuitively correct an intervention may be, that doesn’t make it scientifically sound, mean its
benefits outweigh the potential harms, or that it is the most ethical use of skyrocketing healthcare costs.
(Junkfood Science)
They should be careful with this nonsense: Salt
'as bad as cigarettes' - AUSTRALIANS are consuming too much salt, say nutritionists who blame not only fast
food but also healthier alternatives such as canned vegetables and baked beans.
Less than 5 per cent of all sausages and beef burgers sold in the nation's supermarkets contained acceptable
levels of salt, a Nutrition Society of Australia conference has also heard.
Jacqui Webster, a senior project manager based at Sydney's The George Institute for International Health, said
Australians were consuming well over the maximum recommended intake of six grams of salt a day. (AAP)
For if salt and cigarettes are of equivalent harm then cigarettes are essentially harmless or salt (an
essential micronutrient) should be banned? Bloody idiots.
Health fears go up in smoke - A year
ago, Scottish health chiefs boasted that the smoking ban had cut heart-attack rates. It was a load of hot air.
In September 2007, the Scottish government declared that the country’s year-old smoking ban had led to a
dramatic fall in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which includes heart attacks and angina.
Health officials argued that these figures vindicated their illiberal anti-smoking policy. But data released this
week cast serious doubts on the theory that smoking bans have a measurable impact on ACS. (Christopher Snowdon,
sp!ked)
Parsing the
Cancer Statistics - There is heartening news in the latest annual report on cancer trends. The report shows
that a long-term decline in death rates from cancer has continued in both sexes. And for the first time, there is
evidence that the rate of newly diagnosed cancers has declined in recent years. It is news worth celebrating. But
it is also important to recognize some worrying countertrends.
The new report — from the American Cancer Society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National
Cancer Institute and an association of cancer registries — attributes the gains primarily to a drop in lung,
colorectal and prostate cancer in men and in breast and colorectal cancer in women.
There seems little doubt that the decline in cancer death rates since the early 1990s is real. It is attributed to
healthier lifestyles, improved screening and better treatments. But the decline in newly diagnosed cancer cases is
more difficult to interpret. (New York Times)
Scientists probe limits of 'cancer stem-cell model';
Melanoma does not fit the model -- One of the most promising new ideas about the causes of cancer, known as
the cancer stem-cell model, must be reassessed because it is based largely on evidence from a laboratory test that
is surprisingly flawed when applied to some cancers, University of Michigan researchers have concluded. (PhysOrg.com)
British
Balance Benefit vs. Cost of Latest Drugs - RUISLIP, England — When Bruce Hardy’s kidney cancer spread to
his lung, his doctor recommended an expensive new pill from Pfizer. But Mr. Hardy is British, and the British
health authorities refused to buy the medicine. His wife has been distraught.
“Everybody should be allowed to have as much life as they can,” Joy Hardy said in the couple’s modest home
outside London.
If the Hardys lived in the United States or just about any European country other than Britain, Mr. Hardy would
most likely get the drug, although he might have to pay part of the cost. A clinical trial showed that the pill,
called Sutent, delays cancer progression for six months at an estimated treatment cost of $54,000.
But at that price, Mr. Hardy’s life is not worth prolonging, according to a British government agency, the
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The institute, known as NICE, has decided that Britain,
except in rare cases, can afford only £15,000, or about $22,750, to save six months of a citizen’s life. (New
York Times)
Tragic but how many life months will his treatment deny others? Is diverting that $30,000 to briefly delay
this guy's inevitable death the best use of limited health funds? Sad as it may be everybody dies and society
simply cannot throw unlimited funds into extending everyone's lives at all cost. Unrealistic and undeliverable
expectation is just another downside of universal health care -- if this guy was properly insured then he'd get
his treatment -- but total loss universal 'care' can never deliver that kind of coverage.
Consensus Of Whom? -
"Consensus" has become one of the scariest words in America. It means officials have reached agreement
on how to fleece the public. And it's being used in the same breath as "universal health care." (IBD)
How
Foreign Aid Destroyed Africa - Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Martin Durkin, the producer of the
documentary The Great Global
Warming Swindle. He has been the executive producer of a wide range of programmes and television
documentaries for Channel 4 in Britain and he is managing director of WAG TV, a London-based independent TV
production company. One of his main specialties is the catastrophe of economic aid to Africa. (Jamie Glazov,
FrontPageMagazine.com)
Environmentalism's Appropriation of Christianity -
“The ecological reformation of Christianity,” according to one scholar, “may be one of the most significant,
though least noted events of this age.” (1) The environmental movement has conducted a 50 year campaign to
appropriate the world’s Christian Churches. This is a top-down affair involving the recruitment of key clerics,
theologians, Archbishops, Patriarchs and Popes. The stakes are huge. Churches claim 2 billion followers and assets
worth trillions (US$). The reformation is partly complete. While Churches now promote Ecology they have yet to
convert most Christians into green consumers, activists and voters. (EcoFacism)
December 3, 2008
Ultimate Global Warming Challenge Entries -
We did receive a few entries in The Ultimate Global Warming Challenge although half a million dollars was
apparently insufficient to entice The Hockey Team at RealClimate to bother claiming what they say is a sure thing.
Neither did Hansen, Romm, Gore et al, despite our having made clear they need not personally sully their hands
with the prize sponsor's funds, we'd direct it to any charity they cared to name. Must be nice being so affluent
that stooping to pick up $500,000.00 is a waste of your time, eh?
Oh well, five people did submit entries ranging from playful to hopeful, linked below in .pdf format. Have a
look at them and see what you think:
A Simple Proof That Humans Have
Affected Global Temperatures: past and present - ABSTRACT: A proof-theoretic characterization of logical
scenarios formed a suitable basis for testing two Ultimate Global Warming Challenge hypotheses regarding climate
predictions. The first hypothesis (i.e. surface temperatures are not affected by the production of greenhouse
gases) was put to the test with a simple “bare-foot” analysis (a method that most anyone could repeat). This
null hypothesis (H1) was rejected since the use of fossil fuels (during construction of roads), can cause
long-term increases in surface temperatures. The second hypothesis (H2) involved predicting the impact of future
hypothetical scenarios on global economics. A dire prediction from a world-renowned soothsayer indicates a
catastrophic event will indeed have a negative effect on the biosphere as well as on per capita income. This
global disaster causes flooding of several countries and will result in a reduction in the human population. The
global effect of the meteor will put an end to the debate over the potential economic effects of a 1°C increase
in average temperatures. (David B. South)
Save Al Gore (ThermoGrafix) -
This is an encrypted file which I am certainly not going to retype here. No, I'm not sufficiently enthused to
image it through a text reader either.
UGWC Hypothesis (V.
Manoharan) - very colorful and also encrypted (these guys must think someone will want to copy from their entries
when in reality it simply makes them a damn nuisance to handle and/or highlight).
Manmade
Emissions are Contributing to Global Warming - Abstract: The scientific method cannot ‘prove’ a theory,
only disprove it. Therefore, it is not possible to conclusively prove that anthropomorphic emissions are resulting
in global warming. Instead, what we can do is show this theory passes all tests that the scientific method puts it
to. That is being done here by addressing three questions: 1) Is the Earth warming?; 2) If so, is this warming at
least partly due to the greenhouse effect or is it all due to other sources; and 3) If any of the warming is due
to the greenhouse effect, are manmade emissions contributing to it? If, via the scientific method, we can show
that the answer to these three questions is ‘Yes’, then it must be concluded that manmade emissions are
contributing to global warming. (Chris Keating)
UGWC Challenge -
Summary/Abstract: \A report published in February 2007 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
confirms that the observed increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, and
nitrous oxide since 1750 is the result of human activities. Scientists now have 90% confidence – thanks to major
advances in climate modeling and the collection and analysis of data – that human activities are causing the
world to warm.
The full report – “Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis” is published by Cambridge University
Press. It was produced by some 600 authors from 40 countries. Over 620 expert reviewers and a large number of
government reviewers also participated. Representatives from 113 governments reviewed and revised the Summary
line-by-line during the course of this week before adopting it and accepting the underlying report. The full
report is available at www.ipcc.ch, www.wmo.int
or www.unep.org.
The report describes an accelerating transition to a warmer world marked by more extreme temperatures, heat waves,
new wind patterns, worsening drought in some regions, heavier precipitation in other, melting glaciers and Arctic
ice, and rising global average sea levels. (I. Daniels)
La Niña may be returning - La Niña,
a Pacific atmospheric phenomenon that ended during the summer, to be replaced by ENSO-neutral conditions, shows
some signs of life again. (The Reference Frame)
Major Oops! Researchers Use Sun Cycle to
Predict Rainfall Fluctuations -- The sun’s magnetic field may have a significant impact on weather and
climatic parameters in Australia and other countries in the northern and southern hemispheres.
According to a study in Geographical Research published by Wiley-Blackwell, the droughts in eastern Australia are
related to the solar magnetic phases and not the greenhouse effect.
The study titled “Exploratory Analysis of Similarities in Solar Cycle Magnetic Phases with Southern Oscillation
Index Fluctuation in Eastern Australia” uses data from 1876 to the present to examine the correlation between
solar cycles and the extreme rainfall in Australia.
It finds that the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) – the basic tool for forecasting variations in global and
oceanic patterns – and rainfall fluctuations recorded over the last decade are similar to those in 1914 -1924. (PhysOrg.com)
Mythbusting
- I mentioned yesterday the fashionable lines being bandied about as the Poznan COP gets underway. Today’s is
the idea of “renew[ing] America’s standing in the world as a force for positive change,” in the phrasing of
Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton at her Monday unveiling.
Kyoto is the highest-profile policy typically cited by these forces of restoration, and is certainly the one about
which The One has expressed his intention to do something. So here’s a refresher as to who actually trashed our
reputation via Kyoto — if indeed that is what certain people sincerely believe, as opposed to using it as an
excuse for certain attitudes and behavior, which I believe you will conclude is the case after this
English-to-English translation.
The U.S. agreed to, then signed, a treaty that a unanimous Senate, exercising its constitutional prerogative,
instructed the executive not to agree to. (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Cooling Down - Policymakers and
other busybodies trying to save the planet will one day learn that, despite all the hype about global warming,
most people are focused on issues that for them are more meaningful. (IBD)
Prins - Time
to Ditch Kyoto, The Sequel - Gwyn Prins, of the London School of Economics, has written a follow-on piece to
his collaboration with Steve Rayner that appeared in Nature just over a year ago. (Time to Ditch Kyoto, a shorter
version of The Wrong Trousers, PDF). Prins’ follow on is published in the Delegate’s Book to the Poznan
Climate Conference, and I am happy to provide a copy here in PDF. (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Will
the U.N. Chill Out on Climate Change? - 10,000 people from 186 countries have descended upon Poznan, Poland
for yet-another United Nations meeting on climate change. This time, it’s the annual confab of the nations that
signed the original U.N. climate treaty in Rio in 1992. That instrument gave rise to the infamous 1996 Kyoto
Protocol on global warming, easily the greatest failure in the history of environmental diplomacy. (WCR)
Developing nations seek cash in U.N. warming
fight - POZNAN, Poland, Dec 2 - Developing nations urged rich nations at U.N climate talks on Tuesday to raise
aid despite the financial crisis to help the poor cope with global warming and safeguard tropical forests.
(Reuters)
Shaping Economic
Analysis to Suit Climate Politics - Today’s ClimateWire reports (subscription needed) that California’s
proposed climate policy — known by its bill number as AB32 — has been soundly criticized by a distinguished
panel of six internationally recognized economists with expertise in carbon policies: (Roger Pielke, Jr.,
Prometheus)
California Called Out on Bogus Economic Analysis -
Harvard’s Robert Stavins wrote, "I have come to the inescapable conclusion that the economic analysis is
terribly deficient in critical ways and should not be used by the state government or the public for the purpose
of assessing the likely costs of CARB's plans." (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Sarkozy
moves to enlist Eastern EU members on climate change - French President and EU presidency holder Nicolas
Sarkozy will this weekend make a dramatic attempt to obtain the agreement of the bloc's Eastern countries on the
bloc's climate change package, ahead of a crucial EU summit on 11-12 December, sources told EurActiv.
Most US organizations not adapting to climate change -
Organizations in the United States that are at the highest risk of sustaining damage from climate change are not
adapting enough to the dangers posed by rising temperatures, according to a Yale report. (Yale University)
Translation: most enterprises too sensible to fall for gorebull warming scam.
12
years to halve UK CO2 - First report of the Government's Climate Change Committee warns targets will be missed
without radical cuts
Britain should adopt the world's toughest climate change target and slash nearly half of its greenhouse gas
emissions in the next 12 years, the Government's new climate advisory committee said yesterday in its first
report.
Emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases causing global warming should be cut by 42 per cent on 1990 levels by
2020, as long as there is a new global climate deal in a UN meeting in Copenhagen a year from now, said the
Committee on Climate Change. (The Independent)
More unsettled settled science: Rivers are carbon
processors, not inert pipelines - Microorganisms in rivers and streams play a crucial role in the global
carbon cycle that has not previously been considered. Freshwater ecologist Dr. Tom Battin, of the University of
Vienna, told a COST ESF Frontiers of Science conference in October that our understanding of how rivers and
streams deal with organic carbon has changed radically. (European Science Foundation)
A
New Paper “Changes In Climate And Land Use Have A Larger Direct impact Than Rising CO2 On Global River Runoff
Trends” by Piao et al. 2007 - Thanks to Valentine Anantharaj of the Geosystems Research Institute at
Mississippi State University for alerting us to this very interesting new paper.
Shilong Piao, Pierre Friedlingstein, Philippe Ciais, Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudre, David Labat, and Sönke Zaehle,
2007: Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends.
PNAS, vol. 104, no. 39, 15242-15247. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Possums
not fried - You are being misled by alarmists:
SCIENTISTS say a white possum native to Queensland’s Daintree forest has become the
first mammal to become extinct due to man-made global warming.
The white lemuroid possum, a rare creature found only above 1000m in the mountain forests of far north
Queensland, has not been seen for three years.
Experts fear climate change is to blame for the disappearance of the highly vulnerable species thanks to a
temperature rise of up to 0.8C....
Scientists believe some frog, bug and insects species have also been killed off by climate change. But this
would be the first known loss of a mammal and the most significant since the extinction of the Dodo and the
Tasmanian Tiger.
“It is not looking good,” researcher Steve Williams said.
“If they have died out it would be first example of something that has gone extinct purely because of
global warming.”
Rising temperatures - which these researchers blame on man - are said to have caused this extinction. So
let’s check the
mean maximum temperatures at the nearest big weather station, Cairns, and see if things have grown
possum-deadly hotter over the past 30 years: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
Still desperate to find something (anything) that could be bad about a booming biosphere: Scientists:
Longer allergy season may be linked to climate change - Still sneezing, even though it's December? You might
be able to blame it on global warming.
Allergists are looking at the possibility that global warming produces bigger, nastier ragweed plants that pump
more pollen into the atmosphere. Bottom line: If true, you'll be sneezing more often, for more days out of the
year. And that could be the least of our worries. (Dallas Morning News)
LATIN AMERICA: Changes in Land Use, Changes in Climate
- MEXICO CITY, Dec 2 - The countries of Latin America have failed to design integrated policies to control the
processes of changes in land use, one of the causes of climate change. The region produces 12 percent of the
world's emissions of greenhouse gases, which are driving up the planet’s average temperatures and changing the
climate around the globe. (Tierramérica)
Time to prepare
for disasters caused by climate change is now, says UN - 2 December 2008 – The United Nations Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) today launched a campaign to raise awareness of the humanitarian
implications of climate change, calling for improved disaster preparedness and response measures in countries that
suffer most from extreme weather events. (UN News)
Yes, dealing with natural disasters is a big deal and yes, the means to do so is through development and
wealth generation but no, it has squat to do with gorebull warming, which is purely a distraction.
This nonsense, again: Health - a Victim of
Climate Change - MÉRIDA, Mexico, Dec 2 - More malaria, diarrhea, and asthma: these diseases are on the rise
around the world because of environmental destruction and kill some three million children under five and two
million adults a year. (IPS)
What they really mean is lack of development and wealth generation is lethal -- exactly that which is under
assault through gorebull warming hysteria. Stupid game...
Moonbat... Long,
detailed, impressive - but futile in the face of runaway climate change - This environmental state of
emergency demands a bolder answer than Lord Turner's. We could start by taking six critical steps (George Monbiot,
The Guardian)
Ain't no possibility of "runaway climate change" (read: gorebull warming) on our water-rich world.
These Can’t Be
Related, Can They? - Reinsurance giant Munich Re, a company I have worked with in the past, says that global
warming should mean increased premiums: (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Soot speeds Arctic warming: Research
- Pollution researchers have called on policymakers to increase emphasis on soot, methane and ozone in the battle
to rein in climate-warming emissions.
The Climate Policy Center researchers said soot falling on the Arctic is one of the reasons behind the rapid
melting of the polar ice cap in recent years, Reuters reports. The pollution experts, led by Pam Pearson, said
such a re-focus would have a greater impact on slowing global warming than targeting carbon dioxide above all.
(Carbon Positive)
Canada Oil Sands Threaten Millions Of Birds - Study - CALGARY - A
coalition of North American environmental groups says the development of Canada's oil sands region threatens to
kill as many as 166 million birds over the next five decades and is calling for a moratorium on new projects in
the region.
The coalition's groups, which include the Natural Resources Defence Council, the Boreal Songbirds Initiative and
the Pembina Institute, say petroleum-extraction projects in the oil-rich region of northern Alberta are a threat
to migratory birds and the boreal forest they rely on.
Their study concluded that development of the oil sands, would be fatal for 6 million to 166 million birds because
of habitat loss, shrinking wetlands, accumulation of toxins and other causes. (Reuters)
Hard Facts and Innumeracy: Coal Use Grows Despite
Global Warming Warnings - Last year, during an interview with Vaclav Smil, I asked the distinguished professor
of geography at the University of Manitoba why there was such a paucity of informed discussion about energy
issues. He replied “There has never been such a depth of scientific illiteracy and basic innumeracy as we see
today.”
That line comes to mind amid the continuing calls for phasing out coal in the U.S. In July, Al Gore, the former
vice president and recent winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, declared that the U.S. should “commit to producing
100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years.” In
November, in an op-ed in the New York Times, Gore insisted that the U.S. must replace “dangerous and expensive
carbon-based fuels with 21st-century technologies that use fuel that is free forever: the sun, the wind and the
natural heat of the earth.”
Gore’s calls have been seconded by groups like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace as well as by the International
Energy Agency. On November 25, the I.E.A.’s executive director, Nobuo Tanaka, said that “Preventing
irreversible damage to the global climate ultimately requires a major decarbonisation of world energy sources.”
(Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
“No one wants to leave the
house” - Wind turbines and neighborhoods just don’t mix It seems. Would you want one of these to do this
when a wind storm comes your way? Wind power has it’s pluses and minuses, just like any energy solution. But
like a coal or nuclear power plant. They really shouldn’t be sited next to/within population areas. - Anthony
(Watts Up With That?)
Replacing corn with perennial grasses improves carbon
footprint of biofuels - Converting forests or fields to biofuel crops can increase or decrease greenhouse gas
emissions, depending on where – and which – biofuel crops are used, University of Illinois researchers report
this month. (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
German automakers denounce EU compromise on CO2 emissions
- The German automobile federation VDA slammed on Tuesday an EU compromise on rules to cut CO2 emissions from new
cars, saying it ignored the sector's current crisis. (AFP)
A tragic reminder
that water is not healthy for babies - Doctors were able to save little baby Ladamien with about an hour to
spare, but this story is a heart-stopping reminder that water is not a healthful drink for babies. When they are
hungry, they need fats and calories.
With growing numbers of young families struggling during these economic hard times — and others believing the
childhood obesity hysteria telling them baby fat is bad and must be avoided — please remember that diluting
formula with water, trying to fill babies up on less and make formula stretch, can cause malnutrition, brain
damage and death in infants and toddlers. (Junkfood Science)
Times have
changed — one in two college kids have a psychiatric disorder? - Wild and crazy toga parties, food fights,
drinking, smoking, and foolish pranks made National Lampoon’s Animal House a cult classic thirty years ago.
Today, college kids like Bluto, played by John Belushi, and his friends would be diagnosed as needing psychiatric
treatment.
Nearly half of all college-age young people had a psychiatric disorder in the past year, according to
psychiatrists from New York in the latest issue of Archives of General Psychiatry. More precisely, their
behaviors, as reported to interviewers during a 2001-2002 epidemiological survey, matched symptoms listed in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). (Junkfood Science)
The War On Peanuts - North
Carolina is the fifth-largest peanut grower in the U.S., yet peanut-allergy nazis have persuaded even officials in
that state to crack down on PB&Js.
Take Union County Public Schools, the fastest-growing school district in the Tar Heel state. Officials there
recently sent letters home to parents asking that they no longer pack peanut-butter sandwiches or cookies in their
kids' lunches.
If they abide by the restriction, a certificate with their child's name will be placed on display at their school
"in acknowledgment of the voluntary commitment to safety your family has made."
The district's also shaming parents into washing their kids' hands in the morning before they go on the bus, lest
they transfer the dangerous peanut molecule and endanger a seat mate.
The move isn't isolated to North Carolina. It's a national trend. Other states have banned peanuts altogether from
schools, while others have created peanut-free zones within schools. (IBD)
Screen addiction 'bad for
kids' health' - SPENDING a lot of time watching TV, playing video games and surfing the web makes children
more prone to a range of health problems including obesity and smoking, US researchers said today.
US National Institutes of Health, Yale University and the California Pacific Medical Centre experts analysed 173
studies done since 1980 in one of the most comprehensive assessments to date on how exposure to media sources
impacts the physical health of children and adolescents.
The studies, most conducted in the US, largely focused on television, but some looked at video games, films,
music, and computer and internet use. (Reuters)
Peter
Foster: Coming soon: An all-new, all-green NEP - The past week’s bizarre political events brought to mind
Joe Clark, a(nother?) Conservative Prime Minister (albeit an earlier “Progressive” model) who was brought down
by his own strategic misjudgment and the oppositions’ cynical power lust. Cynical power lust remains a constant
in politics. The issue is how the reflexive interventionist ideology of the liberal left has morphed since 1980.
Thirty years ago, economic nationalism was the redoubt of the wise and clever state; now it’s the environment.
(Peter Foster, Financial Post)
Green
Asthma Inhalers - Crazy. Is there really a problem with asthma inhalers destroying the ozone layer? (Greg
Pollowitz, Planet Gore)
Why
Reporters & Judges & Professors Are Biased - That the news media were biased in the 2008 presidential
election is now acknowledged by fair-minded people, left or right.
As Time magazine's Mark Halperin said this weekend at a Politico/USC Conference on the 2008 election: "It's
the most disgusting failure of people in our business. ... It was extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage."
Given how obvious this bias is, the question is not whether liberals in the media tend to offer biased reporting.
The question is why? Why can't liberal news people report the news without any slant?
The answer is that for people on the left, all - I repeat, all - professions are a means to an end, not ends in
themselves. That end is the social transformation of society, meaning the promoting of "social justice"
as the left understands that term.
For most liberal news reporters, therefore, the purpose of news reporting is not to report news as objectively as
possible. The purpose of the media in general and of reporting specifically is to promote social justice and the
social transformation of society. (Dennis Prager, The Bulletin)
Search for ivory-billed woodpecker to begin anew --
Last year, Allan Mueller thinks he saw the elusive ivory-billed woodpecker. The wildlife biologist wants to make
sure of it this winter. (Associated Press)
DEVELOPMENT-SOUTHERN AFRICA: Harnessing the Zambezi
- LILONGWE, Dec 2 - If the socio-economic development goals of the eight countries that share the Zambezi River
basin are to be met, countries along the river should quickly implement plans towards managing water resources in
an efficient, effective and sustainable manner. (IPS)
IAEA Says Irradiated Crops Could Ease Food Crisis - VIENNA - The
UN atomic agency called on Tuesday for greater trust and investment in using radiation to bolster crops against
climate change and disease as a way to save millions from hunger.
The technique has been around since the 1920s and proven effective but its spread has been limited by phobias over
the words "radiation" and "mutation", the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a
statement.
But unlike bio-engineered genetic modification of crops (GM), irradiating plant species -- known as "induced
mutation" -- does not introduce any foreign genetic material. (Reuters)
Fight over adding
hormones, labeling milk rages on - KANSAS CITY, Missouri - Anti-biotech forces turned out in Kansas on Tuesday
to argue against a state plan that would limit how dairy products free from artificial hormones can be labeled.
The Kansas Department of Agriculture held its final hearing on the matter Tuesday morning, considering a
regulation that would ban dairy product labels from stating the product as "rBST free." The law would
take effect in January 2010.
In addition to banning "rBST-free" claims, the rule would require that labels declaring products to have
been derived from cows not supplemented with the growth hormone to carry companion disclaimers saying "the
FDA has determined that no significant difference has been shown between milk derived from rBST-supplemented and
non-rBST-supplemented cows." (Reuters)
December 2, 2008
Obama
pledge on treaties a complex undertaking -- President-elect Barack Obama's pledge to restore the United
States' international standing extends far beyond front-page topics such as closing Guantanamo and banning
torture, into areas as diverse as nuclear testing, the rights of women and people with disabilities, and military
and commercial activities in the world's oceans.
As a candidate, Obama promised to seek Senate ratification of long-stalled treaties on a nuclear test ban, women's
equality and the law of the sea, and to sign a U.N. convention on disability rights. He also vowed to reverse
President Bush's policies on global warming and to join negotiations toward a long-term treaty on greenhouse-gas
emissions. (SF Chronicle)
We agree Bush panders far too much to greenhouse hysterics and a reversal from paying lip service to this
nonsense is long overdue. Get away from it, far away.
Legates
Clarifies Global Warming 'Consensus' At Wynnewood Institute - Wynnewood - References to the "consensus
view" of global warming pervade news coverage of the issue, but climatologist David Legates says that phrase
needs clarification.
An associate professor at the University of Delaware, Dr. Legates also serves as Delaware's state climatologist,
though the position does not obligate him to share the views of other state officials. Speaking to an audience at
the nonprofit Wynnewood Institute Tuesday night, he said something that may have sounded like a concession, coming
from a skeptic on the issue: The climate is changing. For about a century, the average global temperature has seen
a net rise. But, he emphasized, the climate always has been changing. (The Bulletin)
Questions
a-plenty on global warming - ONE of ABC television’s remaining links to a more intelligent era, The Einstein
Factor, ended its season on Sunday, closing with its signature quote from the great physicist: “The important
thing is not to stop questioning.”
From his blinkered approach to the question of climate change, it is patently clear that Prime Minister Kevin Rudd
is no Einstein. Not even an apprentice Einstein.
Far from questioning climate change, Rudd, aided and abetted by a largely compliant CSIRO and a plethora of
pandering academics eager to receive government funding, has all but shut down discussion on the issue.
For Labor, particularly, there is no science to discuss. It is settled.
Further, Rudd encourages his fawning acolytes to denigrate those who follow Einstein’s approach to science as
“deniers”, and says of them: “To stay in denial as the climate change sceptics and some members opposite
would have us do, is reckless and irresponsible.”
Unfortunately for Rudd, his climate change minister Senator Penny Wong and his faddist spinmeister Dr Ross Garnaut,
the science is far from settled. (Piers Akerman Blog)
This is what happens when bad hypotheses become fashionable: Foretelling
a major meltdown: Rare mineral might portend return to hothouse climate of old - By discovering the meaning of
a rare mineral that can be used to track ancient climates, Binghamton University geologist Tim Lowenstein is
helping climatologists and others better understand what we're probably in for over the next century or two as
global warming begins to crank up the heat — and, ultimately, to change life as we know it. (Binghamton
University)
For a start there is no reason to suspect the elevated carbon dioxide levels were anything other than an
artifact of temperature (e.g. oceanic outgassing in a warmer climate) and there remains no evidence raising
atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from say 200 to 2,000 ppmv has a significant effect on global mean
temperature. Moreover Earth has plunged into ice ages with high levels of carbon dioxide and emerged from them
during periods of low CO2 concentration so the possibility of the CO2-forcing hypothesis
having merit is extremely low.
:) Greens go nuts at UN climate
talks - Armed with walnuts, apocalyptic art and a small green dinosaur, environmentalists spiced up the UN
climate talks here Monday with colourful demands for action on global warming.
The World Wildlife Fund, or WWF, welcomed the almost 11,000 participants at the 12-day talks in Poznan by handing
out walnuts and urging them to "crack the climate nut" and overcome negotiation deadlock.
Greenpeace meanwhile unveiled a three-metre (10-foot) high sculpture depicting the Earth on the brink of
destruction from a "tidal wave" of carbon dioxide made of wood and coal. (AFP)
UN
climate talks a test of will - FOR the next two weeks, environment ministers from 192 nations will batten down
in the chilly Polish city of Poznan to confront one big question: can politicians bridge the gap that separates
them from climate scientists over the action needed to avoid dangerous climate change? (Sydney Morning Herald)
No Marian, it's a test of won't while countries jockey to get someone gullible to allow them competitive
advantage, which this has always been about.
No Excuse To Neglect UN Climate Fight - Delegates - POZNAN - The
economic slowdown is "no excuse" to neglect a fight against global warming that could widen water
shortages to half of humanity by 2050, delegates told the opening of UN climate talks in Poland on Monday.
US President-elect Barack Obama also won praise at the Dec. 1-12 talks of 10,700 delegates from 187 nations
for setting "ambitious" US goals for cutting greenhouse gas emissions to slow climate change. (Reuters)
57 delegates per signatory country to do what, exactly? Why are we paying all these twits to be on perpetual
world tours to talk about the weather? These are very pricey events involving a lot of hangers on all talking
about something no rational person wants them to achieve -- rationing energy and lowering human living
standards. Sheesh!
Save
the planet! Ban warming summits! - No one is gassier than a global warming alarmist: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
Poznan
Puffery - A favorite line already emerging as the Poznan talks on Kyoto II kick off this week is that Kyoto I
is obviously a success because emissions among covered parties are down 17 percent “since 1990.” (Chris
Horner, Planet Gore)
Japan, U.S. Seek
to Divide Developing Nations at Climate Talks -- Japan and the U.S. will try to jumpstart global-warming talks
this week by proposing that some of the biggest developing countries, including China and India, agree to limit
their emissions of greenhouse gases. (Bloomberg)
India Sets Out Demands In Climate Change Fight - Dec 1 - India,
the world's no. 4 greenhouse gas emitter, joins about 185 nations in Poznan, Poland, from Monday to work on a new
UN climate pact meant to curb global warming.
Following are some of the main points India has made in submissions to the United Nations ahead of the talks,
which are part of a two-year drive to replace the Kyoto Protocol from 2013.
The United States, China, India and Brazil are currently outside Kyoto's first phase till end-2012. Kyoto only
commits 37 rich nations to binding emissions targets. (Reuters)
European Update - The
United Nations Climate Change Conference kicks of this week in Poznan, Poland, and in anticipation of this great
event, we have examined three research papers published recently in top journals that give us insight into the
climate history of Europe. Given the results of these papers, we doubt they will receive any press attention from
the massive media delegation covering the climate conference. (WCR)
Poznan
kicks off as EU climate talks stumble - Delegates from 186 nations are in Poznan, Poland today (1 December) to
launch 12 days of talks designed to bring forward an international deal to tackle climate change. But the
conference is currently overshadowed by an EU internal row over how to share the 'effort' of reducing CO2
emissions. (EurActiv)
UN takes step on slow road to new
Kyoto - Poland: hero or villain on climate change? That will be the question for thousands of delegates at a
series of crunch meetings on global warming taking place in the next two weeks.
While many of the Polish government's climate change experts will be in the western Polish city of Poznan, hosting
the governments of more than 190 countries at United Nations talks on global warming, their colleagues will be
holed up hundreds of miles away in Brussels arguing for a serious weakening of the European Union's climate change
targets.
Both talks reach a conclusion at the end of next week, with the UN expected to set out a timetable and a skeleton
framework for a new global agreement to replace the Kyoto protocol, which will be finalised over the course of a
crammed year of negotiations ahead of a final meeting next December in Copenhagen.
But the role of the European Union, which has long been the world's most strident champion of drastic greenhouse
gas emissions cuts, will be severely undermined if Poland, Italy, the Czech Republic and a handful of other member
states get their way on watering down the bloc's commitment to cut its emissions by 20 per cent by 2020.
"It is highly ironic," said one EU official of Poland's stance. "But we are confident that we will
have a deal in Brussels." (Financial Times)
Environment must give way to economy: Tories -
LAKE LOUISE, ALTA. - Jim Prentice, the Federal Environment Minister, said yesterday Ottawa would not harm an
already-weakening economy to pursue environmental progress.
In his first speech since taking over the portfolio, Mr. Prentice told top business leaders here that the economy,
including protecting investment and jobs, has moved ahead of the environment as Canadians' top concern. (Financial
Post)
Sigh... Climate juggernaut on the
horizon, UN talks told - War, hunger, poverty and sickness will stalk humanity if the world fails to tackle
climate change, a 12-day UN conference on global warming heard on Monday.
A volley of grim warnings sounded out at the start of the marathon talks, a step to a new worldwide treaty to
reduce greenhouse gases and help countries exposed to the wrath of an altered climate. (AFP)
Can the Climate Survive the Financial
Crisis? - Just as the world gathers in Poland to come up with a new climate treaty to replace the Kyoto
Protocol, the global financial meltdown threatens to torpedo the effort. But could a world recession actually help
the climate? (Der Spiegel)
Idiots! The climate is fine, it's people we need to worry about!
From CO2 Science this week:
Public Comment to the Environmental Protection Agency:
Read our Public Comment (in PDF format) submitted to the EPA on 24 November 2008 in Response to the Environmental
Protection Agency's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean
Air Act, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0318.
Editorial:
Late 20th-Century Acceleration in the Growth of Greek
Fir Trees: Was it caused by the rising atmospheric CO2 concentration?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data published by 641
individual scientists from 375
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm Period Record of the Week comes from the Tornetrask
Area, Swedish Lapland. To access the entire Medieval Warm Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Transgenic Plants: How are they
affected by atmospheric CO2 enrichment? ... and how might they better cope with global
warming?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses to atmospheric CO2
enrichment obtained from experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Barley,
Erect Brome, Garden
Bean, and Monterey Pine.
Journal Reviews:
Atmospheric Methane on the Rise Again?: It remains to
be seen.
Tropical Atlantic and Caribbean Cyclones: How have
their numbers varied over the past three centuries?
The Medieval Warm Period in Canada's Columbia Icefield:
When did it occur? ... and how hot did it get?
Water Relations of Aspen and Aspen-Birch Forests
Exposed to Elevated CO2 and Ozone: How are they affected by the two trace gases? ... and
which effect predominates?
How Does Climate Change Affect the Ranges of European
Birds?: A new paper suggests that no one really knows (even though they may think they do).
CO2 Truth-Alerts:
Click here to watch short videos on
various global warming topics. Embed any Truth Alert video on your own web page or to watch it on YouTube in a
higher resolution. (co2science.org)
Parliament
bans the cool facts - Note what Labor does when Liberal MP Dennis Jensen tries to table evidence in Parliament
that directly contradicts the global warming hype: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
A Warm-Monger's Climate Scare Tactic Demolished - Below is
an exchange at CCNet between Climate Alarmist Andrew Glikson and Paul Biggs. Glikson lays out a case that sounds
solid if one doesn't know how weak it truly is. Dr. Biggs does what I lacked the time to do since it posted;
demolishes it completely. (Timothy Birdnow)
Climate
change targets could push up household bills to £500 a year, says Government chief - Tough new targets on
tackling climate change will cost Britain £500 a year per household, push up utility bills and force 1.7million
Britons into fuel poverty by 2020. (Daily Mail)
Say what? Climate
change fight could create jobs - AID specialists support a claim by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon that
efforts to adapt to climate change could create "millions of jobs" if enough funding is available. (Agence
France-Presse)
We are expected to cough up vast sums of money so these dipsticks can spend some of it paying poor
people to do nothing useful (less, of course, suitable administrative wages and costs for themselves).
Our scam... Nielson,
Taylor & Clark: Govt should go with emissions trading scheme - The new Government's decision to put the
emissions trading scheme on hold pending a review came as a bolt from the blue.
Stakeholders had been led to expect that there would be some changes to the ETS but the proposal to pass
legislation putting it on hold was completely unexpected.
The decision has thrown the emerging carbon market into disarray. It has undermined the recent launch of the New
Zealand Stock Exchange's carbon trading platform, TZ1. (New Zealand Herald)
Actually it's high time the NZ Government, having won election on reality as opposed greenie fantasies,
jettisoned gorebull warming hysteria altogether.
Criminalizing Carbon - A British
jurist wants to form an international court for the environment with the power to punish states and businesses.
Will fossil fuels soon become controlled substances? (IBD)
Farmers Panic About a
‘Cow Tax’ - The comment period for the Environmental Protection Agency’s exploration of greenhouse gas
regulation ended last Friday, with farmers lobbying furiously against the notion of a “cow tax” on methane, a
potent greenhouse gas emitted by livestock. (New York Times)
Venice Flooded As Sea Levels Hit Highest In 22 Yrs - ROME - Large
parts of Venice were flooded on Monday as heavy rains and strong winds lashed the lagoon city, with sea levels at
their highest level in 22 years. (Reuters)
Junkscience
Journalism: Sea Level Trends in South Pacific - The Earth’s climate is very complex and well beyond the
understanding of even the best scientists. The forces “creating” the climate can be powerful, natural,
unknown, and interacting in both complex and unknown ways.
These forces involve the sun and the many variations of the solar production of radiant heat and light, the
variations in solar magnetic fields, variations in sunspots production rates, the solar wind and its interaction
between cosmic radiation and interactions with the Earth’s magnetic field.
Furthermore there are strong and mostly unexplainable variations in movements of oceanic tides and current
variations, about which we also know little.
With so much that is unknown and with so much uncertainty about the climate, one would expect that global warming
scientists and their swarms supporters in the media, academia, and the political leadership, would be a little
cautious, even humble at making sweeping and profound statements of their rigid certitudes. (Michael R. Fox,
Hawaii Reporter)
EU Agrees To Cut Car Emissions In Climate Fight - BRUSSELS -
European carmakers must cut global-warming gases from new vehicles by 18 percent within the next six years, the EU
agreed on Monday, after a long battle between environmentalists and an industry facing tough times.
"This deal represents a balance between the needs of the environment and the car industry across Europe,
which is suffering massively at the moment," British Conservative lawmaker Martin Callanan told Reuters late
on Monday.
But the compromise was attacked by environmentalists, who said it was tailored too neatly around big auto's
demands and undermined EU efforts to lead the world in fighting climate change. (Reuters)
Autocar Readers Defy
Emissions Beliefs - 90 per cent of survey respondents ‘not guilty’ about driving their cars. (Climate
Research News)
Rush for renewable energy will
put '£80 on household bills' - HOUSEHOLDS are facing large rises in their electricity bills in the coming
decade because of the "dash" for renewables, according to an influential House of Lords report.
Consumers across Britain face an extra £80 a year on their energy bills as a result of the Government's
commitment to source 15% of the UK's power from renewables by 2020. In Scotland, the target is higher, with
ministers pledging to source 50% of the country's electricity from renewables by that year. (The Scotsman)
Clearing Forests For Biofuel Hurts Climate - Study - POZNAN -
Clearing tropical forests to plant biofuels is a bad idea for the climate and reduces the diversity of animal and
plant life, a study found on Monday.
"Keeping tropical rain forests intact is a better way to combat climate change than replacing them with
biofuel plantations," according to scientists from seven nations writing in the journal Conservation Biology.
Millions of hectares of forest land in South East Asia has been converted to palm oil plantations to produce
biofuels -- seen as greener than fossil fuels because plants soak up greenhouse gases from the atmosphere as they
grow.
But the study, released on the opening day of 187-nation talks on a new UN climate treaty in Poland, said it would
take 75 years for carbon emissions saved from using biofuels to make up for carbon released into the atmosphere by
burning down a forest to clear it for a biofuel plantation. (Reuters)
The
Free Speech Alliance Declares War on the “Censorship Doctrine”
A multitude of organizations, hundreds of thousands of individuals join together to defend the First Amendment
from a reinstatement of the so-called "Fairness" Doctrine
Editor's Note: You too can join the Free Speech Alliance. Click here and sign the petition, and stand at the ready
for whenever any liberal again threatens the First Amendment with talk of reinstating the Censorship Doctrine. (NewsBusters)
Never mind the pens and
donuts - Dismissing information or research out of hand simply because of the source — whether it’s
connected to groups whose politics we don’t agree with, is reporting something we don’t want to believe, or
the author once received funding or consulted for a stakeholder — is a fallacy of logic known as ad hominem.
It’s a simplistic response used by those unable to examine the accuracy and scientific integrity of the
information itself. While it may be instinctive, it also leaves us more susceptible to bad science and to miss
some of the best.
It’s not the source, it’s the science that matters. (Junkfood Science)
Surgery is not for two -
For women wanting to get pregnant, the soundest medical information is vitally important for their health and
safety, and that of their babies. The riskiest thing a woman of childbearing age can do is to trust any medical
information from reporters or a news story. No credible medical professionals would ever consider basing patient
care decisions on news stories, either. Doctors know that the results could be devastating for the women and
babies in their care. (Junkfood Science)
Lack of vitamin D could spell heart trouble - Vitamin D
deficiency—which is traditionally associated with bone and muscle weakness—may also increase the risk of
cardiovascular disease (CVD). A growing body of evidence links low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to common CVD risk
factors such as hypertension, obesity and diabetes, as well as major cardiovascular events including stroke and
congestive heart failure. (American College of Cardiology)
See! Grandma knew a thing or two sending the kids out to play in the healthy sunshine! UV hysteria and Ozone
Man's last ridiculous scare campaign have done a lot of harm to people's health for vitamin D is truly the
"sunshine vitamin" (you synthesize it in your skin with reactions powered by sunlight). And what is
the precursor compound from which you create this wonder health product? Cholesterol. Yup, the same compound
from which you make testosterone and other necessary goodies for health and vigor. Still convinced it's icky,
nasty stuff that must be pharmacologically-reduced to ever-lower levels? Still frightened a little sunshine will
kill you? You shouldn't be.
Persistent pollutant may promote obesity - Tributyltin,
a ubiquitous pollutant that has a potent effect on gene activity, could be promoting obesity, according to an
article in the December issue of BioScience. The chemical is used in antifouling paints for boats, as a wood and
textile preservative, and as a pesticide on high-value food crops, among many other applications. (American
Institute of Biological Sciences)
So, uh... I shouldn't eat the antifouling paint off boat bottoms or I might get fat.....
Bet it doesn't slow the anti-dam cranks any: Salmon-tracking
network upends some sacred cows - WASHINGTON — They were two of the 1,000 juvenile salmon implanted with
almond-sized transmitters as they headed out of the Rocky Mountains, down the Snake River bound for the sea.
Their remarkable three-month, 1,500-mile journey of survival to the Gulf of Alaska was tracked by an underwater
acoustic listening network that has wired the West Coast from just north of San Francisco to southeastern Alaska.
The tracking network could provide a model for a global system.
A salmon's life in the ocean has always been one of nature's best kept mysteries.
However, scientists using the Pacific Ocean Shelf Tracking network have made some startling discoveries that
challenge long-held beliefs about salmon survival and raise new cautions about how global warming may affect
salmon and other marine species.
Among the findings:
Previously, it was thought that the highest mortality rates for salmon were in the freshwater streams and rivers
as they headed to the saltwater ocean. But using the acoustic tracking system, researchers found that within the
first few weeks of entering the ocean, 40 percent of the salmon died. Meanwhile, billions of dollars have been
spent to increase in-river survival rates of salmon through projects such as habitat improvements in spawning
areas and the modification of hydroelectric dams.
A study by Welch, which has touched off a major scientific debate, found dams may have less of an impact on salmon
survival rates than previously thought. The study found juvenile salmon from the Columbia River, with its string
of massive hydroelectric dams, survived their downstream migration equally or better than those migrating
downstream in the dam-free Fraser River in British Columbia. Some environmentalists have insisted the only way to
restore the Columbia River runs is by breaching four dams on the lower Snake River, a major tributary of the
Columbia. (McClatchy Newspapers)
ENVIRONMENT-US: Bush Quietly Passes Dozens of New Rules
- UXBRIDGE, Canada, Dec 1 - As the world community meets in Poland this week to find solutions to the climate
crisis, the George W. Bush White House is chaining the United States' tiller to prevent a change of course by
President-elect Barack Obama by passing new anti-environmental rules and regulations at a furious pace.
Nearly a million hectares of public wildlands in Wyoming and Utah are being opened up to oil shale extraction, the
Endangered Species Act is being gutted, as are regulations regarding factory farm operations, the Clean Air Act,
and removing mountaintops to dig for coal and more, said a coalition of environmental groups.
"There are many last-minute changes and some are draconian," said Josh Dorner of the Sierra Club, an
environmental NGO. (IPS)
Excellent! Shame he hasn't managed to undo much of the damage wrought by Slick Willy at the end of his
disastrous term but we'll take what we can get.
Food
crunch opens doors to bioengineered crops - KUNMING, China - Zeng Yawen's outdoor laboratory in the terraced
hills of southern China is a trove of genetic potential , rice that thrives in unusually cool temperatures, high
altitudes or in dry soil; rice rich in calcium, vitamins or iron.
"See these plants? They can tolerate the cold," Zeng says as he walks through a checkerboard of test
fields sown with different rice varieties on the outskirts of Kunming, capital of southwestern China's Yunnan
province.
"We can extract the cold-tolerant gene from this plant and use it in a genetically manipulated variety to
improve its cold tolerance," Zeng says.
In a mountainous place like Yunnan, and in many other parts of the developing world, such advantages can tip the
balance between hunger and a decent living. And China is now ready to tip that scale in favor of genetically
modified crops. (Associated Press)
How
fears turned to trust - Christian Walter has heard it all before.
"I've been accused of being in the pocket of Monsanto and other companies that have an interest in GE. I
consider myself an environmentalist. I want to understand what the risks are and how they can be mitigated. I've
no commercial interests. I put the data from my research in front of the people at this conference, in front of GE
Free NZ and anyone who is interested. I want to be judged and trusted on my research which is publicly
funded."
The senior scientist at Scion is responding to a press release from GE Free NZ saying many of the speakers at the
GM Biosafety Symposium in Wellington a week ago were scientists "with vested interests in promoting the hasty
commercialisation of GMOs for private gain".
For Walter it's an insulting statement that fails to understand how science works. He says he got into genetic
modification research doing a PhD in Germany when he was still a member of Greenpeace and at the time very
critical of the field.
"The more I learned, the more I found the risks weren't as big as some people wanted us to believe." He
says it was the realisation that what occurs in conventional breeding is much more dangerous to the genome
compared to genetic engineering, that changed his view. (New Zealand Herald)
Iraq To Revive Dead Farmland By Sucking Out Salt - BAGHDAD - Iraq
started flushing excess salinity out of millions of acres of land on Monday in a project aimed at cleansing
rivers, breathing new life into dying soils and reviving what was once part of "the fertile crescent".
Though Iraq is wetter and more arable than many of its desert-covered neighbours, centuries of irrigation and
over-use have left swathes of farmland fallow because of salinity.
Salt collects in soil when farmers irrigate it with salty water or do not drain it properly. The soil gradually
becomes useless.
"It's a huge project: we are seeking to collect and drain all the salty water and remove groundwater from the
centre and the south (of Iraq)," Water Resources Minister Abdul Latif Rasheed said at the launch of the
project.
First thought up in the 1950s but frequently delayed by political upheaval, the project seeks to revive six
million acres (2.5 million hectares) of land. (Reuters)
December 1, 2008
The Crone... Save
the Economy, and the Planet - Environment ministers preparing for next week’s talks on global warming in
Poznan, Poland, have been sounding decidedly downbeat. From Paris to Beijing, the refrain is the same: This is no
time to pursue ambitious plans to stop global warming. We can’t deal with a financial crisis and reduce
emissions at the same time.
There is a very different message coming from this country. President-elect Barack Obama is arguing that there is
no better time than the present to invest heavily in clean energy technologies. Such investment, he says, would
confront the threat of unchecked warming, reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil and help revive the
American economy.
Call it what you will: a climate policy wrapped inside an energy policy wrapped inside an economic policy. By any
name, it is a radical shift from the defeatism and denial that marked President Bush’s eight years in office. If
Mr. Obama follows through on his commitments, this country will at last provide the global leadership that is
essential for addressing the dangers of climate change. (New York Times)
Not even close! Even the foolish EU, who leapt into rash "climate control" mode years ago in an
attempt to gain trade advantage over the US, has said "heck no" now that the costs are apparent and
the economy is faltering. This is the moment you want to hand economic saboteurs a victory they admit they can
not win?
President-elect
Barack Obama proposes economic suicide for US - If the holder of the most powerful office in the world
proposed a policy guaranteed to inflict untold damage on his own country and many others, on the basis of claims
so demonstrably fallacious that they amount to a string of self-deluding lies, we might well be concerned. The
relevance of this is not to President Bush, as some might imagine, but to a recent policy statement by
President-elect Obama. (Christopher Booker, Daily Telegraph)
Obama on the 'urgency' of
combating 'global warming' - In a video shown at a costly, two-day "global warming" jamboree at the
Beverly Hills Hotel, hosted by Governor Schwarzenegger of California in November 2008, Barack Obama said:
"Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than combating climate change. The science is
beyond dispute and the facts are clear. Sea levels are rising. Coastlines are shrinking. We've seen record
drought, spreading famine, and storms that are growing stronger with each passing hurricane season. Climate change
and our dependence on foreign oil, if left unaddressed, will continue to weaken our economy and threaten our
national security."
Obama said he would introduce "a federal cap and trade system to reduce America's emissions of carbon dioxide
to their 1990 levels by 2020 and reduce them an additional 80 percent by 2050." He said his administration
would "invest" $15 billion a year in solar power, wind power, biofuels, nuclear power and clean coal to
"save the planet" by creating 5 million new "green jobs". (The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley,
American Thinker)
Economy may force Obama to cut
back on green pledge - Barack Obama, who promised last week to write a "new chapter in America's
leadership" on the environment, could find his hands tied by the economic crisis, a leading figure in global
climate change negotiations said yesterday. (The Guardian)
New battle brews on Capitol Hill: Dems
vs. Dems - WASHINGTON -- Congressional Democrats have a bigger majority than they've enjoyed in decades, but
that doesn't necessarily mean there will be unity on Capitol Hill.
A new battle may be brewing as Democrats fighting Democrats show evidence of a party divide.
The growing Democratic majority could be in deadlock from within on issues ranging from climate change and energy
to health care and social security.
"We're not just talking ideology here. The broader your majority, the more you've got different regions of
the country that have different economic and social interests that you have to take into account," said
Norman Ornstein, a scholar with the American Enterprise Institute. (CNN)
Europeans
concerned about US climate commitment - WASHINGTON — Despite widespread optimism that President-elect Barack
Obama will adopt policies more to their liking, some European officials are preparing to be disappointed on global
warming. (AP)
Compromise Or Lose Climate Deal, Poland Warns EU - BRUSSELS -
Europe risks failing on a deal to fight climate change this year because richer nations refuse to budge in a
battle with poorer states over the costs, Poland's EU affairs minister Mikolaj Dowgielewicz said on Thursday.
An EU deal next month is seen as vital to catalyze global talks on cutting greenhouse gases from other big
emitters such as Russia, China, India and the United States.
"There is no guarantee of success -- we are very far," Dowgielewicz told reporters. "The number of
outstanding issues is enormous." (Reuters)
Rich Shelving CO2 Cut Ambitions As Economies Slow - OSLO - Many
industrialised nations are shelving ambitions for the deepest cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 as economic
slowdown overshadows the fight against climate change.
About 190 countries meet for UN climate talks in Poznan, Poland, next week with scant mention of a deal in Vienna
last year by almost all rich nations to consider cuts in emissions of 25-40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020.
"That target is perhaps something that's on the back-burner for the time being," said Rajendra Pachauri,
head of the UN Climate Panel that said last year that industrialised nations needed to make such cuts to avoid the
worst of warming. (Reuters)
Really? Australia Sees No Reason To Delay Carbon Plan -
CANBERRA - The financial crisis was no reason to delay implementing an Australia-wide carbon trading plan, details
of which will be unveiled with interim targets on Dec. 15, Australia's minister for climate change said on Friday.
(Reuters)
but Wong
delays emissions target - AUSTRALIA'S delay in announcing its 2020 greenhouse target until after a UN summit
is a defensive move suggesting the Government will not take a lead in post-Kyoto talks.
That assessment comes from observers of the climate negotiation process.
Despite assurances that Climate Change Minister Penny Wong would fly to the summit in the Polish city of Poznan
with a target on the table, the announcement has been delayed until December 15 — three days after talks
conclude.
The delay also means Australia will not reveal its target until European leaders try to paper over growing
divisions on a plan to cut emissions by at least 20 per cent by 2020.
A news release late on Friday said Canberra would take account of international developments before revealing the
depth of its emissions cuts. (The Age)
Australia
squibs on climate promise - THE Rudd Government has reneged on a commitment to present its 2020 target to cut
greenhouse gases to UN climate talks that start today. The back-pedalling comes amid wrangling in cabinet over how
far to go with curbing emissions. (Sydney Morning Herald)
Australia needs a Moratorium on Emissions Trading
- Viv Forbes from the Carbon Sense Coalition today called on the Australian Government to announce an immediate
moratorium on plans to introduce an Emissions Trading Scheme.
“In the midst of global financial turmoil and plummeting profits for Australia’s backbone industries, it is
irresponsible to maintain uncertainty on who will be affected by these taxes, when and by how much.
“Australia is more reliant on mining, transport, electricity, cement, smelting, refining, farming, tourism and
trade than any other country in the world. Taxes on emissions of carbon dioxide will reduce growth and jobs in all
of these industries. The longer this uncertainty remains, the more jobs will be lost or go overseas. (CFP)
Green Taxes Need Explaining Or Risk Backlash - Study - OSLO -
Governments must do a better job of explaining environmental taxes such as charges on driving in cities or higher
electricity bills or risk a public backlash, a study showed on Friday.
Governments often fail to link green taxes to their goal of curbing energy use or helping a shift to renewable
energies, according to Steffen Kallbekken, of the Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research in
Oslo.
"People do not understand environmental taxes," he told Reuters. "There is quite a strong belief
that the revenues just disappear into a big black hole". (Reuters)
Actually taxpayers tend to have a good grasp on "environmental" taxes -- they are fully aware they
are being ripped off with no hope of any good ever being delivered.
Efforts to
support global climate-change falls: Poll - PARIS - There is both growing public reluctance to make personal
sacrifices and a distinct lack of enthusiasm for the major international efforts now underway to battle climate
change, according to findings of a poll of 12,000 citizens in 11 countries, including Canada.
Less than half of those surveyed, or 47 per cent, said they were prepared to make personal lifestyle changes to
reduce carbon emissions, down from 58 per cent last year.
Only 37 per cent said they were willing to spend "extra time" on the effort, an eight-point drop.
And only one in five respondents - or 20 per cent - said they'd spend extra money to reduce climate change. That's
down from 28 per cent a year ago. (Canwest News Service)
EU
heads towards scaled-down climate ambitions - The French EU Presidency is "putting everything on the
table" in a "desperate" bid to agree on the climate and energy package before the end of the year,
sources close to the negotiations told EurActiv.
Poznan
Climate Talks Endangered by Global Crisis - Although bringing 190 nations to the table to discuss the delicate
problems of climate change and global warming was no easy deal, the United Nations predicts a "gloomy"
outcome, among talks of the widely-spread financial crisis. Yvo de Boer, head of the UN Climate Change
Secretariat, predicts that participant countries will invoke all kinds of reasons to avoid making changes, citing
their monetary difficulties. (Softpedia)
Testing times for
peer juggling financial crisis and climate peril - Lord Turner puts forward 'budgets' for green progress -
recession or not (The Guardian)
This item is more interesting for the manner in which it highlights ignorance at The Guardian. Under a
pretty picture of water vapor issuing from cooling towers is the caption: "Gas being flared off at the
Grangemouth oil refinery". Uh, no. Memo to Guardian, the interesting lighting effect in Murdo
MacLeod's picture is from the low-horizon sun behind the central tower, the visible water vapor is composed of
droplets, not gas and gas flares are the plumes of flame seen at various facilities as waste gases are burnt
off.
China,
India lead demand extra help for climate struggle - BEIJING: China and India next week will spearhead calls
for rich nations to dig into their pockets to tackle climate change but will resist targeted curbs on their own
carbon emissions, sources say. (AFP)
Environment
Minister places economic priority over environment - In his first major speech since taking the post of
federal environment minister, Jim Prentice signalled his government will not stir greater troubles in Canada's
economy with strident environmental policies.
"We will not - and let me be clear on this - we will not aggravate an already weakening economy in the name
of environmental progress," Prentice said in a speech to business leaders at the Bennett Jones Lake Louise
World Cup Business Forum Friday morning.
"If this means re-examining the way forward in the face of present-day economic realities, then so be
it." (Calgary Herald)
Climate Fight Costs May Be Three Times More - LONDON - The cost of
efforts to avoid dangerous global warming may be 170 percent higher than 2007 estimates, a report for the UN's
climate agency said on Thursday.
The report comes four days before the UN leads a fresh round of talks in Poland to agree a successor to the Kyoto
Protocol in ongoing negotiations marred by squabbles over who should bear the cost of fighting climate change.
The UN report cited research by the International Energy Agency (IEA), energy adviser to 28 countries, and others
which showed growing capital costs especially in the energy sector.
"The increased investment needed is entirely due to higher capital costs for energy supply facilities,"
it said. (Reuters)
Cost of reducing
emissions by 2030 likely to surge: UN report - PARIS — Hundreds of billions more dollars are likely to be
needed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by a 2030 target, according to UN estimates published on Friday ahead of
global talks on climate change. (AFP)
Carbon regulation could "cripple" Texas: Perry - HOUSTON
- Texas Gov. Rick Perry said on Tuesday that the economy of the leading energy producing U.S. state would be
"crippled" by a federal agency's proposal to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. (Reuters)
Stop
the warming! Ban Coke! - Reader J from Melbourne wonders why global warming crusaders still drink Coke. Or
beer. Or any soft drink also aerated with carbon dioxide - the gas we’re told is heating the world to hell. Read
below the results of J’s fascinating investigation - involving everything from Mentos to the Internet. But some
highlights: (Andrew Bolt Blog)
Many items like this and I suggest the Coca-Cola company may be a lot less cooperative with greenpeas et al
-- in fact they might even distribute some sensible consumer information rather than recycling misanthropic
green pap.
The fool’s gold of carbon
trading: A huge new market designed to solve global warming seems doomed to failure - It was a deal to make
Alistair Darling hug himself with glee. Just as the world’s existing financial markets were hitting a five-year
low two weeks ago, the Treasury raked in a cool £54m from a brand new one. The occasion was Britain’s first
auction of CO2 permits. Almost 4m were knocked down to greenhouse gas emitters in a sale that was four times
oversubscribed. The government expects to sell 80m more over the next four years, raising a further £1 billion.
(Sunday Times)
New Zealand's carbon market cast into limbo - WELLINGTON - New
Zealand's fledgling carbon market has been thrown into limbo only weeks before its planned start date, after the
incoming government met an election pledge to review emissions trading, industry officials said.
The scheme was to be the first carbon cap-and-trade scheme outside of Europe and had been designed to help the
country meet its obligations under the Kyoto climate-change protocol. (Reuters)
Eye-roller: Climate
change gathers steam, say scientists - PARIS — Earth's climate appears to be changing more quickly and
deeply than a benchmark UN report for policymakers predicted, top scientists said ahead of international climate
talks starting Monday in Poland.
Evidence published since the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change's (IPCC) February 2007 report suggests
that future global warming may be driven not just by things over which humans have a degree of control, such as
burning fossil fuels or destroying forest, a half-dozen climate experts told AFP.
Even without additional drivers, the IPCC has warned that current rates of greenhouse gas emissions, if unchecked,
would unleash devastating droughts, floods and huge increases in human misery by century's end.
But the new studies, they say, indicate that human activity may be triggering powerful natural forces that would
be nearly impossible to reverse and that could push temperatures up even further. (AFP)
Sierra Nevada climate changes feed monster,
forest-devouring fires - Wildfire has marched across the West for centuries. But no longer are major
conflagrations fueled simply by heavy brush and timber. Now climate change is stoking the flames higher and
hotter, too. (Tom Knudson, Sacramento Bee)
Check out the comments under this Knudson warming fantasy -- I don't think they are quite on the same page as
Knudson & the Bee :)
Trees To Fight Warming? Insurers Ponder Risks - OSLO - Paying
landowners to let forests grow is promoted by the United Nations as a viable way to fight global warming, but
experts first have to puzzle out how to insure trees against going up in smoke.
Under UN plans, owners will get carbon credits to slow the destruction of tropical forests. But fires caused by
lightning -- along with other hazards such as storms, insects and illegal logging -- are a big risk for insurers
and investors.
A new UN climate treaty to include granting forest owners tradeable carbon credits will be discussed by about 190
nations in Poznan, Poland, from Dec. 1-12. The credits could be worth billions of dollars for those agreeing not
to cut down trees. (Reuters)
It's actually not that hard: "carbon credits" have exactly zero value so insure for lumber or not
at all.
All the usual begging bowls before a climate meet: Forests
Under Threat From Climate Change: Study - OSLO - Forests are extremely vulnerable to climate change that is
set to bring more wildfires and floods and quick action is needed to aid millions of poor people who depend on
forests, a study said on Thursday.
The report, by the Jakarta-based Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), urged delegates at a UN
climate meeting in Poznan, Poland, from December 1-12 to work out new ways to safeguard forests in developing
nations. (Reuters)
Can't blame them for wanting to be paid for hot air too: Forestry
group lobbies for carbon credits - LONDON - Farmers and forest managers should be allowed to earn carbon
offsets from planting and looking after trees in tropical countries, the Nairobi-based World Agroforestry Center
said on Wednesday. (Reuters)
Wind
Changes over Time and Space as a Climate Metric to Diagnose Temperature Trends - In Pielke et al. 2001:
Analysis of 200 mbar zonal wind for the period 1958-1997. J. Geophys. Res., 106, D21, 27287-27290, we demonstrated
that temporal and spatial trends in upper tropospheric winds can be used to diagnosis the trends in the
tropospheric temperatures below the level of the wind observations. This concept uses what is called the
“thermal wind relation” and is a robust, well-established relationship between the change of wind with
altitude and the horizontal temperature gradient. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Real Climate
Misunderstanding Of Climate Models - Real Climate has introduced a weblog titled FAQ on climate models. There
are quite a few issues that can be raised with their answers, but I will focus on just one here. It is their
answer to the question “What is tuning”. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Cave bears killed by Ice Age, not hunters: study - OSLO - Giant
cave bears froze to death during the last Ice Age in Europe about 28,000 years ago, according to a study on
Wednesday that cleared human hunters of driving them to extinction thousands of years later.
The largely vegetarian bears, weighing up to a ton and bigger than modern polar bears or Kodiak bears, apparently
died off as a sharp cooling of the climate led to a freeze that killed off the fruits, nuts and plants they ate.
(Reuters)
Scientists Crack Iceberg Mystery - OSLO - US scientists have
figured out how icebergs break off Antarctica and Greenland, a finding that may help predict rising sea levels as
the climate warms.
Writing in Friday's edition of the journal Science, they said icebergs formed fast when parent ice sheets spread
out quickly over the sea. (Reuters)
Glaciers in Norway Growing
Again - Scandinavian nation reverses trend, mirrors results in Alaska, elsewhere.
After years of decline, glaciers in Norway are again growing, reports the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy
Directorate (NVE). The actual magnitude of the growth, which appears to have begun over the last two years, has
not yet been quantified, says NVE Senior Engineer Hallgeir Elvehøy.
The flow rate of many glaciers has also declined. Glacier flow ultimately acts to reduce accumulation, as the ice
moves to lower, warmer elevations.
The original trend had been fairly rapid decline since the year 2000. (Daily Tech)
Atlantic Hurricane
Season Sets Records - This NOAA press release just showed up in my inbox, it seems to be a completely
different take on the Hurricane season than that of Florida State’s COAPS and Ryan Maue who says:
Record inactivity continues: Past 24-months of Northern Hemisphere TC activity (ACE) lowest in 30-years. (Watts Up
With That?)
Cold snap fails to cool
protagonists of global warming - EUROPE is shivering through an extreme cold snap. One of the coldest winters
in the US in more than 100 years is toppling meteorological records by the dozen, and the Arctic ice is expanding.
Even Australia has been experiencing unseasonable snow.
But the stories about global warming have not stopped, not for a second. (The Australian)
Thousands
of elderly people are dying each winter in a 'national scandal', official figures show - Last winter 25,300
more people died in the winter months than in the summer, an increase of seven per cent on the previous year, data
from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show.
Most of these are due to circulatory and respiratory diseases and the majority occur among the elderly in a
situation which has been condemned by campaigners.
There are fears the death toll will be higher this year as forecasters predict lower temperatures than last year,
utility bills have risen and the credit crunch means many households are struggling to make ends meet. (Daily
Telegraph)
It is cold that kills (Benny Peiser)
Some
locust plagues don't like it hot - It's not often we can report on some good news associated with climate
change. But it seems that warming temperatures could give welcome respite to farmers - in China, at least - by
suppressing locust plagues.
Zhibin Zhang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and colleagues have trawled through 1000 years of historical
records documenting locust swarms and compared it with 1000 years of temperature, drought and flood data
estimates.
They found that the Oriental migratory locust (Locusta migratoria manilensis), which has been named as one of the
most damaging agricultural pests in Chinese history, operates on a climate-driven cycle. Every 160 to 170 years,
the swarms get bigger then subside again.
Counterintuitively, the timing of the largest swarms coincides with cooler periods.
"The popular view is that global warming may accelerate natural and biological disasters like drought and
flood events, and outbreaks of pests, as predicted by the IPCC," says Zhang. "Our results suggest that
warming reduced climatic extremes and locust plagues in ancient China." (New Scientist)
The Nude Socialist believes it counterintuitive that warmer times are good times (they are not
ideologues though...). Wonder if their staff all avoid tropical and Mediterranean holiday destinations?
Meanwhile Chinese history conflicts with the IPCC's model ensemble and must therefore be wrong -- everybody
knows the wildly conflicting models cancel out all errors and must therefore deliver the only true results on
averaging ;)
Statistician
debunks Gore’s climate linkage to the collapse of the Mayan civilisation - This is an email I recently
received from statistician Dr. Richard Mackey who writes: (Watts Up With That)
Oh dear... Melanoma cases likely to decline -
New Zealand could lose its unenviable reputation as the skin-cancer centre of the world thanks to climate change.
Extreme levels of ultra-violet (UV) radiation caused by clear skies and bright sunshine kill between 250 and 300
Kiwis a year, giving New Zealand the highest death rate from melanoma in the world.
However, there may be cause for celebration, with some scientists believing that by the second half of this
century the rate will be falling.
Scientists think that climate change will speed up a recovery of the ozone layer over much of the world and block
out more of the damaging UV rays. (The Press)
To begin with, we have no indication the conceptual "ozone
layer" is broken or that it will ever "be fixed". Moreover, it remains unclear whether UVA
(ultraviolet radiation in the 320-400 nanometer [nm] band and not blocked by ozone) or UVB (270-320nm,
which causes sunburn and is both blocked by ozone (O3) and, if allowed to penetrate the atmosphere,
creates ozone lower in the atmosphere where it can be an irritant in photochemical smog) which is responsible
for malignant melanomas, if either. Regardless, the tropics receive far heavier bombardment with radiation of
both types and yet life thrives there. Finally, it is changing fashion and leisure time which has increased
people's exposure to solar radiation far more than any trivial change in ozone "shielding" as fair
skinned Europeans have gone from occasional outings to the beach in neck to knee swimwear to regularly toasting
themselves "tanning" on the beach in bikinis and briefs. Ironically, clearing cities of coal and wood
smoke has significantly increased urban exposure to solar radiation but this has squat to do with "thinning
ozone".
When
the warmest year in history isn't - Here's another reason why people don't trust newspapers. When science
reporters write about, say, hormone therapy or drinking red wine, they report on studies that find that hormones
or red wine can be good for you, as well as studies that suggest otherwise. Any science involving complex
organisms is rarely black and white.
When it comes to global warming, newspapers play up stories that reinforce the prevalent the-sky-is-falling belief
that global warming is human-caused and catastrophic. But if a study or scientist does not portend the end of the
world as we know it, it rarely rates as news.
In that spirit, many papers (including The Chronicle) have reported on a UC San Diego science historian who
reviewed 928 abstracts of peer-reviewed articles on global warming published between 1993 and 2003, and concluded,
"Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position."
Over 10 years, not one study challenged the orthodoxy - does that sound right to you? If that were true, it would
strongly suggest that, despite conflicting evidence in this wide and changing world, no scientist dares challenge
the politically correct position on the issue. (Debra J. Saunders, SF Chronicle)
How
not to measure temperature, part 78 - teach the children well - Title with apologies to Crosby, Stills, Nash,
and Young.
In my last post, part 77 of “How not to measure temperature” I pointed out that the National Weather Service
in Upton NY has a weather station that is way out of compliance due to the way it is setup and the proximity to
bias factors such as the parking lot. (Watts Up With That?)
<chuckle> Thanksgiving’s Future:
Kangaroo Instead of Turkey? - Incoming President Obama will undoubtedly call for a renewed crusade against
greenhouse gas emissions. Will Thanksgiving dinners in the future feature kangaroo instead of turkey?
Don’t get me wrong. Turkeys emit lots less greenhouse gas than beef cattle. Cattle today are fed lots of grain,
and growing it requires nitrogen fertilizer (made with natural gas), and much diesel fuel for the tractors and
combines. In addition, cows naturally emit vast amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas 20 times as dangerous to the
environment as CO2.
Turkeys (and also chickens) make twice as much meat per pound of grain as cattle, and their stomachs don’t
create methane. That means far less than half as much greenhouse gas emitted per pound of turkey as from beef
production. But Britain just passed a law to cut its greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by the year 2050. If the
U.S. is to match that sort of emission cuts, even turkey won’t be “green” enough. (Dennis Avery, CFP)
Actually Dennis could have told you about Emu
-- not so tasty as turkey perhaps but the portions go further ;)
Al Gore does Oprah -
was anybody watching? - We can only hope the most people in the US are shopping on Black Friday and not
watching the Oprah Winfrey Show today. Al Gore has brought his global warming propaganda machine to share with
Oprah. You can find the details on Oprah’s web page. Here are some of the topics that Gore is pushing: (Watts Up
With That?)
By all means make lawyers richer...Lawyers
call for international court for the environment - A former chairman of the Bar Council is calling for an
international court for the environment to punish states that fail to protect wildlife and prevent climate change.
(Daily Telegraph)
... for what would the world be like without them?
Physicist says warming fears
'manipulated by a political agenda with no scientific basis'
Comments sent to EPA by research physicist John W. Brosnahan of Vanderpool, Texas, who develops remote-sensing
instruments for atmospheric science for such clients as NOAA and NASA and who has published much peer-reviewed
research. Brosnahan has given permission for public release of his statement
As a research physicist who has spent the past 30 years of my career in atmospheric science, I am surprised that
government agencies, politicians, and much of the public have been manipulated by a political agenda with no
scientific basis, which is the best way to describe the "non-link" between CO2 and global warming. There
is virtually NO physical science to support any role of man's generation of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in climate
change. All of this pseudo-science is driven by poorly conceived computer modeling and represents a political
agenda that uses science and the public as pawns. (John W. Brosnahan via Greenie Watch)
Beware
the church of climate alarm - As the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, an economist, anti-totalitarian and
climate change sceptic, prepares to take up the rotating presidency of the European Union next year, climate
alarmists are doing their best to traduce him.
The New York Times opened a profile of Klaus, 67, this week with a quote from a 1980s communist secret agent's
report, claiming he behaves like a "rejected genius", and asserts there is "palpable fear" he
will "embarrass" the EU.
But the real fear driving climate alarmists wild is that a more rational approach to the fundamentalist religion
of global warming may be in the ascendancy - whether in the parliamentary offices of the world's largest trading
bloc or in the living rooms of Blacktown.
As the global financial crisis takes hold, perhaps people are starting to wonder whether the so-called
precautionary principle, which would have us accept enormous new taxes in the guise of an emissions trading scheme
and curtail economic growth, is justified, based on what we actually know about climate. (Miranda Devine, Sydney
Morning Herald)
Erika Lovley,
Welcome to the Show - This piece in Politico yesterday, daring to acknowledge scientific debate about
“global warming,” was not about to go untouched by the opprobrium of the Green noise machine, which is
dedicated to teaching anyone who dares speak up that it might not be beneficial to their careers. (Chris Horner,
Planet Gore)
A Clean Air
Rule to Keep - Among the many environmental indictments of the Bush administration is that it has failed in
two terms to achieve any significant reduction in smog, acid rain, mercury and greenhouse gas emissions from
coal-fired power plants. Its one serious effort to reduce some of these emissions was shot down by the federal
courts. And conditions could easily get worse — weaker laws, more pollution — if President Bush proceeds with
a last-minute rule change aimed at stripping the Clean Air Act of one of its most important provisions. (New York
Times)
Except that NYT's desired format is counterproductive. All it does is discourage plant maintenance and
upgrading. Greenhouse gas emissions will eventually be recognized as the problem that never was or even could
be, mercury mania is basically an assault on the energy supply and is of trivial environmental or health benefit
while acid rain made a good scare of, um, no consequence really (although Scandinavian studies indicate
"acid rain" boosted their forest growth). Exactly why The Crone whines and hand-wrings wanting
nothing good remains a mystery.
UN Climate Boss Warns Of "Cheap, Dirty" Energy Fix -
POZNAN - The world must avoid a "cheap and dirty" fix for the economy that could undermine the fight
against global warming, the UN's top climate official said on Sunday.
Yvo de Boer said the world risked a second financial crisis if governments reacted to economic slowdown by
building cheap, high-polluting coal-fired power plants that might then have to be scrapped as climate impacts hit.
(Reuters)
Except there is not now, never has been nor is there ever likely to be any climatic reason to scrap power
plants.
Shell Says EU Carbon Plan May Harm Refinery - Paper - AMSTERDAM -
European Union plans to tighten carbon trading rules after 2012 risk damaging the global competitiveness of Royal
Dutch Shell's Pernis refinery, a Shell executive told a newspaper published on Saturday. (Reuters)
Well, someone's going to "Drill Baby, Drill!" Russia
to drill for oil in deep Gulf of Mexico Cuban waters - Russian oil companies could soon begin searching for
oil in deep Gulf of Mexico waters off Cuba, a top diplomat said just days before Russian President Dmitry Medvedev
visits the island. Russian oil companies have "concrete projects" for drilling in Cuba's part of the
gulf, said Mijail Kamynin, Russia's ambassador to Cuba, to the state-run business magazine Opciones. (Mercopress)
Low Carbon Price May Stunt Investment In Wind, Sun - LONDON -
Falling prices for European carbon emissions permits could stunt investment in the renewable energy sector both
within and outside Europe, but the credit crunch continues to have a greater impact. (Reuters)
Whatever
happened to the hydrogen economy? - WHATEVER happened to the hydrogen economy? At the turn of the century it
was the next big thing, promising a future of infinite clean energy and deliverance from climate change. Generate
enough hydrogen, so the claim went, and we could use it to transform the entire energy infrastructure - it could
supply power for cars, planes and boats, buildings and even portable gadgets, all without the need for dirty
fossil fuels. Enthusiasts confidently predicted the breakthrough was just five to 10 years away. But today,
despite ever-worsening news on global warming and with peak oil looming, the hydrogen economy seems as distant as
ever. (New Scientist)
What happened to the hydrogen economy? Absolutely nothing -- never was one, never will be.
Environmental
activists to stage 48-hour protest - Up to 30,000 climate refugees could be created if plans to build a new
coal-fired power station go ahead, a report claimed today. (Press Association)
It could also rain moon men, too, but I doubt that just as much...
EU Plans To Limit Biofuel Impact On Forests - BRUSSELS - The
European Commission plans new rules for biofuels by the end of 2010 to prevent the valuable trade from encouraging
the destruction of rainforests, a document seen by Reuters on Thursday showed. (Reuters)
EU Near Green Energy Deal Despite Biofuel Deadlock - BRUSSELS -
The European Union has agreed rough deals on promoting renewable energy, but talks remain deadlocked over the
controversial issue of biofuels, the European Parliament's lead negotiator said. (Reuters)
Green tax is the end of low-cost
flights - Airlines and tour operators have reacted angrily to this week's pre-Budget announcement, warning
that plans to increase green taxes on the “cash cow” of travel will hasten the end of low-cost flights. (The
Times)
New Blog: The
Clamour Of The Times: A Johnsonian Blog: by Professor Philip Stott - Asked by his friend, James Boswell
(1740-1795), why ‘predestination’ figured in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion, Dr. Johnson (1709-1784)
replied that it was but “the clamour of the times”. The aim of this blog is to interrogate “the clamour”
of our own noisy times. (Clamour Of The Times)
Remembering those
less fortunate - Thanksgiving is a day to give thanks for our blessings. It’s also a good time to remember
those whose tummies aren’t full of turkey and all the fixins, who find themselves alone and who don’t have
enough to eat.
The latest Household Food Security in the U.S. 2007 report from the U.S. Economic Research Service revealed that
the percentage of food insecure households in the United States have remained stable over the past decade, but
those with hunger (now called “very low food security”) have steadily crept up — rising by one-third since
1999. Just over 4% of households experienced hunger in our country in 2007. (Junkfood Science)
FDA alert:
All-natural weight loss supplements found tainted - The FDA has issued an alert to consumers and healthcare
professionals about two dietary supplements sold for weight loss. Both have been found to be adulterated with
prescription drugs and could endanger consumers.
According to the FDA’s Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program, these products sold as natural
diet aids have been recalled by the manufacturers. Consumers should discontinue taking them and return the
products to the manufacturers. (Junkfood Science)
Political correctness
teaching prejudice - University students voted to discontinue its fundraiser for a genetic disease that cuts
short the lives of young people. The reason they gave is what has caught attention: the victims of the disease
aren’t the right color or gender. The Carlatan University Students' Association said the disease is not
“inclusive” enough. (Junkfood Science)
Do you know
where your health news and information comes from? - If a commercial entity provides $3-4 million to finance a
news service to produce in-depth coverage of policy issues that make a case for its services — including paying
journalists to write columns, and create video interviews, multimedia and free content for syndication to news
outlets around the world — would most readers consider the news to be unbiased journalism or paid marketing?
(Junkfood Science)
Who needs
science and facts when you can just hire a public relations firm? - A new computer game for children, ages 10
to 14, is already being called the autopsy game. Its goal is to scare children about their food and health, and
teach them that if they eat bad foods — ‘red light’ foods with fats, sugar and salt — they could die
before their parents and get fatal diseases like heart disease and diabetes.
The goal of the game, called Yoobot, is said to be to get kids to realize that their food and lifestyle choices
can have dire consequences and that they are “playing with their futures.” (Junkfood Science)
Diagnoses Of
Cancer Decline in The U.S. - The pace at which Americans are getting cancer has started to decline, marking
what could be a long-awaited turning point in the battle against the disease, according to an annual report that
tracks progress in the war on cancer.
Cancer deaths have also continued a decline that began in the early 1990s, meaning that for the first time both
trend lines are dropping. (Washington Post)
The
Minimal Impact of a Big Hypertension Study - The surprising news made headlines in December 2002. Generic
pills for high blood pressure, which had been in use since the 1950s and cost only pennies a day, worked better
than newer drugs that were up to 20 times as expensive.
The findings, from one of the biggest clinical trials ever organized by the federal government, promised to save
the nation billions of dollars in treating the tens of millions of Americans with hypertension — even if the
conclusions did seem to threaten pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer that were making big money on blockbuster
hypertension drugs.
Six years later, though, the use of the inexpensive pills, called diuretics, is far smaller than some of the
trial’s organizers had hoped. (New York Times)
Always on guard against useful products: EU Watchdog Calls For
Cuts In 13 Pesticide Elements - MILAN - Europe's leading food risk assessment agency EFSA has identified 13
substances whose use should be cut in growing fruit and vegetables to protect human health, it said in a statement
on Thursday.
EFSA, the European Food Safety Authority, is sifting through 300 active substances -- chemicals and
micro-organisms -- used in pesticides across the 27-nation bloc to check if their existing maximum residue levels
are safe for humans. (Reuters)
Ripping off consumers under green camouflage: Canada's Loblaw
To Charge For Plastic Shopping Bags - TORONTO - Loblaw Co, Canada's biggest supermarket chain, said on
Thursday that it will start charging customers a fee for every plastic shopping bag they use.
The company, with more than 1,000 grocery stores across Canada, said it would begin charging customers 5 Canadian
cents a bag on April 22, 2009, which is Earth Day.
The company said it would also encourage customers to use alternatives to plastic bags and enhance its offer of
affordable reusable bag options. Loblaw currently offers reusable fabric bags to its customers for a small fee.
(Reuters)
Green Bridge to Nowhere -
James Gustave “Gus” Speth is the consummate environmental insider. For over thirty years he has played a key
role in the development of environmentalist organizations and agendas. He was present at the founding of the
Natural Resources Defense Council in 1970 and later launched the World Resources Institute, a $27 million
enterprise that may be the most influential environmental think tank in the world. He served on, and eventually
chaired, President Carter’s Council on Environmental Quality, where he oversaw production of the apocalyptic
Global 2000 report. During the 1990s he worked on President Clinton’s transition team and headed up the United
Nations Development Program, and he is now dean of the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.
His prominence within the environmental establishment means that when Gus Speth speaks, environmentalists listen.
He is not only an academic dean but, in many respects, the dean of contemporary environmental thinkers. Like
others, he advocates ambitious and far-reaching environmental programs; unlike many, he has held positions in
which to make such things happen. Few with his green bona fides have his currency in the halls of power or
connections with global leaders. Yet like so many celebrated environmental thinkers, he lacks a clear or
compelling vision of how to reconcile contemporary civilization with the need for environmental protection.
(Jonathan H. Adler, New Atlantic)
Mumbai: the nihilism that dare not speak
its name - The terrible assaults on the Indian city of growth and ambition suggest that contemporary terrorism
is not as alien as we think. (Brendan O’Neill, sp!ked)
The Spread Of Nihilism's Bloody
Stain - The terrorist assault on Mumbai is the latest clash between civilization and nihilism. From the Somali
pirates to the Taliban, this is what the world would be like without America. (IBD)
The Thrill Of Victory - Nineteen
months after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared the war "lost," a freely elected Iraqi
Parliament signs a security pact with the United States. We won. It is the terrorists and their appeasers who
lost. (IBD)
Too many rich US farmers get subsidies: GAO - WASHINGTON - Too
many rich farmers continue to receive US farm subsidies in spite of income caps designed to restrict their
participation, and the Agriculture Department needs to do more to enforce the rules, the auditing arm of Congress
said on Tuesday. (Reuters)
In
Maryland, Focus on Poultry Industry Pollution - WILLARDS, Md. — Standing before a two-story-tall pile of
chicken manure, Lee Richardson pondered how times had changed.
“When I left school and started working the land, this stuff was seen as farmer’s gold,” said Mr.
Richardson, 38, a fifth-generation chicken grower, explaining that the waste was an ideal fertilizer for the
region’s sandy soil. “Now, it’s too much of a good thing.”
How to handle the 650 million pounds of chicken manure produced in the state each year has sparked a fierce debate
between environmentalists and the state’s powerful poultry industry. State officials hope to bring Maryland in
line with most other states next month by enacting new rules for where, how and how long chicken farmers can
spread the manure on their fields or store it in outdoor piles. (New York Times)
Honey bee crisis threatens English fruit farmers - LONDON - Where
in the United States, fruit farmers pay to have bees trucked thousands of miles to pollinate their crops and in
parts of China, humans with feather dusters have taken on the task, in Britain most bees go nature's way.
Britons have a deep nostalgia for home-grown honey and its associations with an ordered rural lifestyle. But here,
too, the honey bee population is dwindling, and with winter under way faces a tough fight for survival.
Besides warnings the country will run out of English honey by Christmas, there is a threat to growers of fruits
such as apples and pears. (Reuters)
Sahel Africans Face Hunger Despite Bumper Harvest - DAKAR - Poor
people in Africa's arid Sahel region will go without food despite bumper harvests this year, as wild price moves
on world markets put staple cereals beyond many families' budgets, aid agencies say. Prices of imported foods have
ballooned in recent years, pushing up prices for locally grown crops even though harvests are expected to be
bigger than ever after abundant rains.
"The nature of food insecurity has changed in West Africa," Alexander Woollcombe, Food Security Advocacy
Advisor at Oxfam GB told Reuters. "It's not a problem of production. The problem is, poor people can't afford
to buy it." (Reuters)
ARGENTINA: Frustration Over Veto of Glacier Protection
Law - BUENOS AIRES, Nov 28 - The decision by the administration of Cristina Fernández to veto a law to
protect Argentina's glaciers -- important reserves of freshwater -- has caused deep concern among scientists and
environmentalists who participated in writing the legislation.
"We worked closely with the legislators to get this law passed," said a disappointed Ricardo Villalba,
geoscientist and director of the Argentine government's institute for snow and glacier research, IANIGLA.
"It's difficult to understand what happened. The scientific community doesn't want to slow economic
development, but rather preserve freshwater sources in a region where the provinces rely on those reserves for
consumption and irrigation," Villalba, a member of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC), told Tierramérica. (Tierramérica)
And that's what they never get -- "preservation" is an attempt at stasis in an ever-changing world.