It has been a year since the United States attended the Kyoto summit on global warming. The intervening months - filled with devastating storms and record highs - have been a dream come true for Al Gore. Yet while Gore hotly proclaims tropical storms prove pollution is warming up the planet, cooler heads are taking a look at issues that cast serious doubt on greenhouse theory.
The awkward nomenclature is necessary to maintain a distinction between global warming itself - the 1.5 degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature during the past 150 years - and speculation that mankind bears much of the blame for the increase because fossil fuels emit heat-trapping gases, which might create a greenhouse effect. The former has been well established. The latter has not.
Don't take our word for it. Listen to James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. In 1988 Hansen testified at the Gore-sponsored Senate hearing that made global warming a household term. "The greenhouse effect has been detected," Hansen said then, "and it is changing our climate now."
Yet late this summer - in a reversal that has received much less publicity - Hansen wrote in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: "The forces that drive long-term climate change are not known with an accuracy sufficient to define future climate change." The interactions of atmospheric components remain "major areas of uncertainty."
Nor has Hansen been the only one to temper his views. In 1990, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted that the average global temperature would rise 3.3 degrees Celsius over the next century. Two years later the IPPC revised that figure downward to 2.8 degrees. In 1995 it revised downward again, to 2.0 degrees - and after factoring out natural climate factors the IPCC said human-caused warming would amount to 1 degree in the next century.
Actual measurements also have taken the air out of the greenhouse balloon. According to John Christy, professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Alabama, "All global-warming models show that [the troposphere] will warm as fast or even faster than the surface of the Earth. The fact that it has not suggests that the typical climate model is not accounting for what is happening in the real world."
What is happening in the real world? The truth - something Gore will not admit - is nobody knows. The Earth is about 4 billion years old, and science has reliable temperature recordings for maybe a couple of centuries. Science can infer climate conditions for a few thousand years - or approximately one-millionth of the Earth's life-span to date. To say that there is a "right" average global temperature, and it happens to be the average temperature around the turn of the 20th Century, makes as much sense as saying a person's pulse should never rise or fall below what it was at 1:57:08 on May 3, 1976. There's such a thing as a natural cycle.
Indeed, science knows temperatures between 1650 and 1850 were lower than before or after those dates, which is why that period is called the Little Ice Age. The IPCC itself says the "Little Ice Age came to an end only in the 19th Century. Thus, some of the global warming since 1850 could be a recovery from the Little Ice Age rather than a direct result of human activities." Laying a graph of sunspot activity over a temperature graph shows interesting correlations as well.
None of which means greenhouse theory is wrong. Most critics merely say its proponents have not yet provided conclusive proof. It would be nice if more of the proponents had the grace to say the same.
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Copyright © 1998 Steven J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake Solutions, Inc.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.