Junk science sinking the judicial system
By Carole K. Cones
Copyright 1999 The Record (Bergen, NJ)
February 3, 1999
Is America's judicial system starting to slide backward into
the
 morass of a Dark Age, where rationality is banned and the
junkiest of
 
junk science warmly embraced? 
 It's hard to conclude much else after a federal judge
recently
 ordered a Washington jury not to consider the latest
scientific 
evidence
 in the case of a woman who claimed her silicone breast
implants caused
 her to contract a crippling disease. 
The jury dutifully obeyed the instructions of Judge William
B.
 Bryant and awarded Brenda G. Meister, a 56-year-old Arlington,
Va.,
 lawyer, a 
staggering $ 10 million. 
Meister had claimed that the breast implants she received
21 years
 ago triggered scleroderma, a debilitating illness and one of
a group of
 connective tissue diseases that cause the body's immune system
to turn
 upon itself. The diseases strike a great number of American 
women, the
 vast majority of them as they enter middle age.  
But a host of recent studies by such respected medical
institutions
 as the Harvard Medical School, Johns Hopkins, the University
of
 Michigan, and the Mayo Clinic have shown conclusively that
such diseases
 strike women with silicone breast implants in virtually the
same
 proportion as they strike women without breast implants. 
 
In other words, the silicone breast implants have no connection
with
 the disease, which means they didn't cause Meister's problems:
hardened
 skin, swollen fingers, calcium deposits the size of tennis
balls in her
 hips and back. 
That is not to minimize her problems, of course. Sleroderma
is a
 horrible disease. But 
silicone implants don't cause any of her symptoms. 
Meister's $ 10 million windfall came a month after a panel
of
 distinguished scientists appointed by a federal judge in
Alabama issued
 a well-publicized report that found no links between breast 
implants and
 the various connective tissue diseases. 
They made their recommendations after spending more than a
year
 reviewing all of the germane scientific literature, more than
two dozen
 studies and similar blue-ribbon panel reviews conducted by the
 governments of Germany, Australia, and Great Britain. 
In the face of such 
overwhelming evidence, juries around the nation
 have handed down verdicts denying awards to plaintiffs in
almost all of
 the breast implant cases that went to trial in the last few
years. 
In fact, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co., the defendant in the
Washington
 case, hadn't lost 
a breast implant case in six years. 
Judge Bryant helped end that winning streak by ruling that
the jury
 couldn't consider the recommendations of the Alabama panel
because their
 report was issued after he started his trial. 
. I MAGINE, for a moment, you're in a 17th-century
courtroom. Four
 people are about to be sentenced to death for their overriding
belief in
 enlightened reason as opposed to blind faith. Suddenly a
messenger
 bursts through the door and shouts, 
"Wait, you can't do this. Galileo
 has just proved the defendants are right, the world is round
after
 all." 
An 
earlier version of Judge Bryant calmly replies,"Sorry,
Galileo's
 discovery came after this trial started. I can't allow the
jury to
 consider it." 
One is tempted to say,"only in the District of
Columbia"because
 jurors in the nation's capital are notorious for granting
exorbitant
 damage 
awards against big corporations under an unusual theory that puts
 
"affordability"ahead of"culpability." 
 But in this case it is judge, not the jury that erred. 
But Judge Bryant is not alone. Unfortunately, judges like
Bryant
 preside in too many courtrooms across America. 
Some are appointed for
 life and hang on well into their dotage. Others are elected ,
often
 after campaigns heavily funded by the very plaintiffs
attorneys that
 will later appear before their bench championing 
junk science over
 truth. 
America sorely needs judicial reform. Unfortunately, the
only
 
reformers allowed to take part in this particular reform are all
members
 of the American Bar Association. 
 Freelance journalist Carole K. Cones frequently writes about
health and
 medical issues concerning women. This article was prepared for
the
 Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service Forum.
Comments on this posting?
Click here to
post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private
comment to the Junkman.