January 30, 2009
Al Gore and
Venus Envy - Al Gore has a new argument for why carbon dioxide is the
global warming boogeyman -- and it’s simply out of this world. (Steven
Milloy, FoxNews.com)
His
Winter of Discontent - Al Gore braved a midwinter snowstorm yesterday
to tell a Senate committee that the world is heating up and the only thing
that can save us is "conservation and renewables." (William
Tucker, American Spectator)
With
Al Due Respect, We're Doomed - The lawmakers gazed in awe at the
figure before them. The Goracle had seen the future, and he had come to
tell them about it.
What the Goracle saw in the future was not good: temperature changes that
"would bring a screeching halt to human civilization and threaten the
fabric of life everywhere on the Earth -- and this is within this century,
if we don't change."
The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry
(D-Mass.), appealed to hear more of the Goracle's premonitions.
"Share with us, if you would, sort of the immediate vision that you
see in this transformative process as we move to this new economy,"
he beseeched.
"Geothermal energy," the Goracle prophesied. "This has
great potential; it is not very far off."
Another lawmaker asked about the future of nuclear power. "I have
grown skeptical about the degree to which it will expand," the
Goracle spoke.
A third asked the legislative future -- and here the Goracle spoke in
riddle. "The road to Copenhagen has three steps to it," he said.
(Dana Milbank, Washington Post)
Dennis
Miller: Al Gore Is a Doofus Hogging The Thermostat - While the rest of
the climate alarmists in the media gushed and fawned over Nobel Laureate
Al Gore's testimony on Capitol Hill Wednesday, at least Americans had
Dennis Miller to offer some sanity to the global warming absurdity: (News
Busters)
Al Gore, The Lobbyist
- In a letter dated January 26th, 2009 Al Gore’s company Generation
Investment Management sent a coalition letter along with other
institutional investors representing $1.7 trillion in assets to Senate
Majority leader Harry Reid. The letter asked for: (Julie Walsh, Open
Market)
Does Gore Gain from
Green Policies He Also Advocates? - Gore’s company, Generation
Investment Management, states that its investment strategy, in part, is to
“find, fund and accelerate green business.” The companies targeted by
renewable energy subsidies, grants and other federal spending are the same
ones Gore and his partners are betting on to turn large profits. There’s
nothing wrong with making a profit, but doing so at taxpayer expense
rather than in a competitive marketplace is generally considered cynical
and greedy – far from the disinterested environmental activist image
that Gore presents to the world. (Richard Morrison, CEI)
Obama's
snow jibe meets icy rebuff in Washington - Shivering Washington
residents gave a chilly reception Thursday to a sarcastic dig from
President Barack Obama over their inability to cope with wintry weather.
Obama got an icy blast from the Washington Post after the city's most
famous incomer expressed disbelief that his daughters' school had shut
down Wednesday -- in line with schools in the city's suburbs -- because of
"some ice."
"Mr Obama can make pronouncements from inside his well-shoveled
bubble, but we can report that it was pretty treacherous out there in the
real world," the Post wrote in an editorial after a number of road
accidents. (AFP)
No! Some
of Earth's climate troubles should face burial at sea, scientists say
- Making bales with 30 percent of global crop residues - the stalks and
such left after harvesting - and then sinking the bales into the deep
ocean could reduce the build up of global carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
by up to 15 percent a year, according to just published calculations.
That is a significant amount of carbon, the process can be accomplished
with existing technology and it can be done year after year, according to
Stuart Strand, a University of Washington research professor. Further the
technique would sequester - or lock up - the carbon in seafloor sediments
and deep ocean waters for thousands of years, he says.
All these things cannot be said for other proposed solutions for taking
carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, methods such as ocean fertilisation,
growing new forests or using crop residues in other ways, says Strand, who
is lead author of a paper on the subject in the journal Environmental
Science and Technology, published by the American Chemical Society.
(Science Centric)
We absolutely do not need or want to deny the biosphere one of its
most prized resources. We are carbon-based life forms, we use it to
construct our own bodies and we specifically combine it with oxygen to
release the energy bound within when its bonds with oxygen were broken
by photosynthesizing plants harvesting it from the atmosphere.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide is good -- it is specifically
life-friendly.
Put your hands in the air and step away from the carbon controls!
The
Amazing Story Behind The Global Warming Scam - The key players are now
all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to
officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax we
citizens for our carbon footprints. Only two details stand in the way, the
faltering economic times and a dramatic turn toward a colder climate. The
last two bitter winters have lead to a rise in public awareness that CO2
is not a pollutant and is not a significant greenhouse gas that is
triggering runaway global warming.
How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big
government we have to struggle so to stop it? (John Coleman, KUSI)
Science
Group Erred Giving Hansen Top Honor - It normally does not make news
when the American Meteorological Society (AMS) gives out awards at its
annual meetings, but this year is an exception. At their 2009 meeting in
Phoenix earlier this month, the AMS bestowed its highest honor, the
"Carl-Gustaf Rossby Research Medal," to James (Jim) E. Hansen of
NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Hansen is arguably the
country's (if not the world's) most prominent climate scientist, but he
also is a well-known climate activist who has been pushing for significant
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Keep reading for more on Hansen, and why AMS was mistaken in granting him
its top honor... (Washington Post Capital Weather Gang)
Murdock: Even left now
laughing at Global Warming - So-called "global warming" has
shrunk from problem to punch line. And now, Leftists are laughing, too.
It's hard not to chuckle at the idea of Earth boiling in a carbon cauldron
when the news won't cooperate: (Scripps Howard News Service)
Teach-In,
turn out, cool off - By now the practice of educational indoctrination
by environmental extremists is well known, from public school showings of
Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth,” to widespread emphasis every year
on Earth Day, to daily guilt trips thrown at students by eco-conscious
teachers.
The latest scheme in the enviros’ toolbox arrives next week with the
National Teach-In on Global Warming. Scheduled for Feb. 5, the
collaborating educators endeavor to “engage over a million Americans in
solutions-driven dialogue.”
You might ask, “solutions to what” – the devastatingly decreasing
global surface temperatures over the last 10 years? The catastrophically
cooling oceans? The awful all-time record extent of Antarctic ice?
No, those actual, observed phenomena are not what these panickers will
screech and teach. Contrarily, they instead harp about the predictions
churned out in their Carnackian computer models that have for years
foretold of massive global temperature increase because of burned fossil
fuels that release heat-trapping gasses into the atmosphere. The
temperature data show otherwise, but that doesn’t stop their schtick:
(Paul Chesser, DC Examiner)
Climate
Change Guru May Be Special ‘Envoy of Disappointment,’ Critic Charges
- Todd Stern was named Special Envoy for Climate Change on Monday by
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Courtesy of Center for American
Progress)
– Signaling a departure from the Bush administration’s
environmental policies, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has named Todd
Stern as special envoy for climate change and vowed that America will
“vigorously pursue negotiations, those sponsored by the United Nations,
and those at sub-global, regional, and bilateral level that can lead to
binding international climate agreements.”
In his acceptance speech on Monday, Stern, a veteran of the Clinton
administration, also foreshadowed the United States signing on to
international environmental treaties, including the Kyoto Protocol.
“The time for denial, delay, and dispute is over,” Stern said. “The
time for the United States to take up its rightful place at the table is
here.”
But William Yeatman, an energy policy analyst with the Competitive
Enterprise Institute, a free market group, said Stern and the State
Department cannot act unilaterally to approve global agreements. (CNSNews.com)
So far,
coal winning out over nuclear - Initially, the confirmation of Energy
Secretary Steven Chu seemed to have brightened the future of both nuclear
power and clean coal — two controversial energy lobbies vying for green
stimulus funding. But for now, coal is emerging as the favorite.
The most recent version of the House economic stimulus package, set for a
floor vote on Wednesday, allots $2.4 billion for carbon capture technology
but nothing for nuclear power. (Politico)
$2,400,000,000 to do explicit harm to the biosphere by denying it an
essential resource... what a crime.
Remembering to visit harm on poor people, too: Europe
tells poor nations to curb emissions - The European Union made its
opening gambit in negotiations for a global framework on climate change on
Wednesday with proposals that developing nations curb the growth of their
greenhouse gas emissions.
Rich countries, including those in the EU as well as the US, are adamant
that poor countries must take on such obligations if negotiations this
year on a successor to the Kyoto protocol – the main provisions of which
expire in 2012 – are to be successful.
The proposal, tabled by the European Commission, said developing countries
should curb emissions by 15-30 per cent of their projected growth by 2020.
(Financial Times)
Climate
change: Commission sets out proposals for global pact on climate change at
Copenhagen - The European Commission today set out its proposals for a
comprehensive and ambitious new global agreement to tackle climate change
and how it could be financed. The new pact is due to be concluded at the
Copenhagen UN climate conference in December. In order to keep temperature
increase below 2°C, developing countries will require substantially
higher funding from the developed world and multilateral institutions to
help them shoulder their contribution to addressing climate change. The
Commission’s proposals include the creation of an OECD-wide carbon
market by 2015 and of innovative international funding sources based on
countries' emissions and ability to pay. (Press Release)
EUROPE: No Money
on the Table Yet - BRUSSELS, Jan 29 - Figures indicating how much the
European Union should give to poor countries affected by climate change
have been removed at the last minute from a new environmental blueprint
published in Brussels Jan. 28.
As part of preparations for a crucial round of talks due to culminate at a
United Nations conference in Copenhagen in late 2009, the European
Commission, the executive arm of the EU, has presented a new paper urging
greater international coordination against global warming.
But while a draft of the plan suggested that up to 30 billion euros (39.7
billion dollars) should be made available to help poor countries adapt to
water shortages and other effects of climate change, the figure has been
erased from the final version.
Stavros Dimas, Europe's environment commissioner, said that firm financing
pledges will be vital in order to clinch an agreement on fighting climate
change in Copenhagen. "No money, no deal," he added.
Still, the lack of specific recommendations on funding in Dimas's plan has
angered green and anti-poverty campaigners. (IPS)
Real
Climate Suffers from Foggy Perception by Henk Tennekes - Roger Pielke
Sr. has graciously invited me to add my perspective to his discussion with
Gavin Schmidt at RealClimate. If this were not such a serious matter, I
would have been amused by Gavin’s lack of knowledge of the differences
between weather models and climate models. As it stands, I am appalled.
Back to graduate school, Gavin! (Climate Science)
Follow
Up To Henk Tennekes’s Guest Weblog - In response to today’s weblog
Real Climate Suffers from Foggy Perception by Henk Tennekes, Gavin Schmidt
and I have e-mailed to each other several times today. He is offended by
the weblog and stated that it inaccurately reported on his professional
credentials. Thus I invited him to write a response as a guest weblog on
Climate Science to refute the claims make in the weblog from earlier
today. Hopefully, he will accept. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
More slurs from
realclimate.org - Realclimate.org continues with its same line of
attack. Wishfulclimate.org writers try again and again to concoct what
appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a
very shallow job. All in the name of saving the world. How gallant of
them.
A recap. According to realclimate.org, everything my "skeptic"
friends and I say about the effect of cosmic rays and climate is wrong. In
particular, all the evidence summarized in the box below is, well, a
figment in the wild imagination of my colleagues and I. The truth is that
the many arguments trying to discredit this evidence simply don't hold
water. The main motivation of these attacks is simply to oppose the theory
which would remove the gist out of the arguments of the greenhouse gas
global warming protagonists. Since there is no evidence which proves that
20th century warming is human in origin, the only logically possible way
to convict humanity is to prove that there is no alternative explanation
to the warming (e.g., see here). My motivation (as is the motivation of my
serious colleagues) is simply to do the science as good as I can. (Nir
Shaviv, Science Bits)
Another
NASA Defection to the Skeptics’ Camp - Something about retirement
apparently frees people up to say what they really believe. I retired
early from NASA over seven years ago to have more freedom to speak my mind
on global warming.
You might recall that after Dr. Joanne Simpson retired from NASA she
admitted to a long-held skepticism regarding the role of mankind in global
warming.
And who can forget NASA’s Administrator, Michael Griffin, admitting that
he was skeptical of the urgency of the global warming problem? After the
outrage that ensued, I suspect he wishes he had never brought it up.
And now my old boss when I was at NASA (as well as James Hansen’s old
boss), John Theon, has stated very clearly that he doesn’t believe
global warming is manmade…and adding “climate models are useless”
for good measure. Even I wouldn’t go quite that far, since I use simple
ones in my published research. (Roy W. Spencer)
No
Reporting of Slowing Greenland Glaciers: Shame on the MSM - SUCH has
been the fear of Greenland’s melting glaciers that well known Australian
science journalist Robyn Williams has claimed sea levels could rise by 100
metres within the next 100 years. Mr Williams, and other journalists, have
been quick to report on what has become known as the “Greenland Ice
Armageddon”.
Last Friday there was an article in one of the most read science journals,
Science, entitled “Galloping Glaciers of Greenland have Reined
Themselves In” by Richard A. Kerr.
Yes, as the title suggests, the article explains that a wide-ranging
survey of glacier conditions across south eastern Greenland, indicates
that glacier melt has slowed significantly and that it would be wrong to
attribute the higher rates of melt prior to 2005 to global warming or to
extrapolate the higher melt rates of a few years ago into the future.
Mr Kerr was reporting on a presentation by glaciologist Tavi Murray at the
American Geophysical Union Conference in San Francisco last December. The
paper by Dr Murray was co-authored by many other members of the group at
Swansea University in the UK, a team often quoted by Al Gore and others.
When I read the article last Friday I wondered how Robyn “100 metres”
Williams and other journalists in the mainstream media (MSM) might report
the story. To my amazement they have simply ignored it. (Jennifer Marohasy)
Australian Heatwave Sign Of
Climate Change - SYDNEY - A heatwave scorching southern Australia,
causing transport chaos by buckling rail lines and leaving more than
140,000 homes without power, is a sign of climate change, the government
said on Thursday.
The Bureau of Meteorology is forecasting a total of six days of 40-plus
Celsius (104 Fahrenheit) temperatures for southern Australia, which would
equal the worst heatwave in 100 years. (Reuters)
So, the reappearance of summers 'like we used to have' is yet another
sign of 'climate change'? Funny that, despite a century of population
growth and urbanization the forecast 'could equal' the 'worst heatwave'
in 100 years, no? So much for allegedly increasing frequency of hot
weather events then.
BELLAMY/DUCHAMP:
World is getting colder - It's the sun, not CO2, that's to blame
After the wet and cold centuries of the Little Ice Age (around 1550-1850
A.D.), the world's climate recuperated some warmth, but did not replicate
the balmy period known as the Middle Age Warm Period (around 800-1300
A.D.), when the margins of Greenland were green and England had vineyards.
Climate began to cool again after World War II, for about 30 years. This
is undisputed. The cooling occurred at a time when emissions of C02 were
rising sharply from the reconstruction effort and from unprecedented
development. It is important to realize that.
By 1978 it had started to warm again, to everybody's relief. But two
decades later, after the temperature peaked in 1998 under the influence of
El Nino, climate stopped warming for eight years; and in 2007 entered a
cooling phase marked by lower solar radiation and a reversal of the cycles
of warm ocean temperature in the Atlantic and the Pacific. And here again,
it is important to note that this new cooling period is occurring
concurrently with an acceleration in CO2 emissions, caused by the
emergence of two industrial giants: China and India.
To anyone analyzing this data with common sense, it is obvious that
factors other than CO2 emissions are ruling the climate. And the same
applies to other periods of the planet's history. Al Gore, in his famous
movie "The Inconvenient Truth," had simply omitted to say that
for the past 420,000 years that he cited as an example, rises in CO2
levels in the atmosphere always followed increases in global temperature
by at least 800 years. It means that CO2 can't possibly be the cause of
the warming cycles.
So, if it's not CO2, what is it that makes the world's temperature
periodically rise and fall? The obvious answer is the sun, and sea
currents in a subsidiary manner. (David J. Bellamy and Mark Duchamp,
Washington Times)
Video: Global
Warming - Global Warming is a "hot" topic. This video looks
at the evidence and focuses on these two questions; Is the Earth getting
warmer? and What ARE the effects of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere?
Check it out, the answers may surprise you. (cassiopeiaproject)
Climate
change: Scientists doubt claims over sea 'fertilisation' - Proposals
to combat global warming by sowing the sea with iron to promote
carbon-gobbling plankton may be badly overblown, according to a study
published on Wednesday.
Ocean "fertilisation" has ignited fierce scientific controversy,
with supporters saying these schemes could stave off damaging climate
change and critics warning that swathes of ocean may turn stagnant or
acidic. (AFP)
Putin’s
Grasp of Energy Drives Russian Agenda - In the past year, Russia has
formed a cartel-like group with Middle Eastern nations with the goal of
dampening global competition in natural gas, sewn up sources of supply in
Central Asia and North Africa with long-term contracts to thwart
competitors and used its military to occupy an important pipeline route in
Georgia.
And this broader struggle extends over a dozen countries from Azerbaijan
to Austria. In its sprawl and slow pace, it is often compared to the
19th-century struggle for colonial possession in Central Asia known as the
Great Game. In the modern variant, Mr. Putin, a master strategist, has
proved far more effective than his European counterparts.
“He has been thinking for some time, ‘What are the means and tools at
Russia’s disposal, to make Russia great?’ ” said Lilia Shevtsova, a
researcher at the Carnegie Moscow Center. In the post-Soviet world, she
said, Mr. Putin concluded that “military power would no longer be
sufficient.”
A spokesman for Mr. Putin, Dmitri S. Peskov, said that the energy market
“was, is and will remain a strategic sphere for Russia” and that
government leaders in Moscow should be versed in the topic. Mr. Peskov
denied the Kremlin used exports for political purposes. Of Mr. Putin’s
deep personal knowledge of the business, he said the prime minister showed
a similar attention to detail in other matters, too.
In this contest, Russia’s overarching goal is to prevent the West from
breaking a monopoly on natural gas pipelines from Asia to Europe. Boris E.
Nemtsov, a former Russian first deputy prime minister who is now in the
opposition, said: “It is the typical behavior of the monopolist. The
monopolist fears competition.” (New York Times)
Scepticism
grows over the viability of green projects - Lord Turner of
Ecchinswell is to investigate the collapse of funding for renewable energy
projects in Britain after the recent exit of a string of companies,
including BP and Shell.
Speaking on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum, Lord Turner,
chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and of the
Government’s Committee on Climate Change, said that the study was a
response to mounting scepticism over the Government’s plans for a huge
expansion of wind and tidal power.
He said he was concerned that a number of key projects had been thrown
into jeopardy, including London Array, a £3 billion scheme to build the
world’s largest offshore wind park in the Thames Estuary. “We have to
make sure that the present climate does not set back our plans,” he
said. (The Times)
BP's Hayward Says World Needs
A Carbon Price - DAVOS - The world must establish a price for carbon
emissions as part of the drive to ensure diverse and secure energy
supplies, BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward said on Thursday.
"We need the world to put a price on carbon," he told the World
Economic Forum.
Carbon pricing involves penalizing every ton of planet-warming greenhouse
gas emissions, whether using a carbon tax or a carbon market which
allocates a fixed quota of emissions permits which countries or companies
must redeem permits for every ton of emissions.
The idea is to tilt competitiveness in favor of clean energy compared to
carbon-emitting fossil fuels. (Reuters)
Researchers define
challenging carbon-emissions targets for U.S. auto industry -- U.S.
automakers must achieve an eightfold reduction in automobile-related
carbon emissions to help stabilize the amount of heat-trapping carbon
dioxide gas in the atmosphere by 2050, according to University of Michigan
researchers. (PhysOrg.com)
Study: Learning
Science Facts Doesn't Boost Science Reasoning -- A study of college
freshmen in the United States and in China found that Chinese students
know more science facts than their American counterparts -- but both
groups are nearly identical when it comes to their ability to do
scientific reasoning. (PhysOrg.com)
Efforts
to preserve health care in the Southwest continue - New Mexico is
following in Arizona’s footsteps. NM Senator William E. Sharer has
introduced Senate bill SJR 1, patterned after Arizona’s “Freedom of
Choice in Health Care Act” (Proposition 101), that would ensure the
freedom of New Mexico residents to purchase private health insurance and
to pay directly for lawful medical care. It would make it unconstitutional
to penalize or fine someone for choosing to get or decline healthcare
coverage or to participate in a particular healthcare system or plan.
(Junkfood Science)
Nutritionist
sceptical of sausage-leukaemia link - Children who regularly eat cured
and processed meat may be at a greater risk of leukaemia, a study
suggests, but an Australian nutritionist says parents need not panic if
their children have been tucking into hot dogs and salami. (Sydney Morning
Herald)
Cleaning
your home may worsen your asthma - NEW YORK - Scrubbing the kitchen
floor or doing other cleaning chores around the home may trigger a spike
in breathing problems in women with asthma, Ohio-based doctors warn in a
report published this month.
"We certainly know that cleaning as an occupation and cleaning agent
exposures are major risks for asthma and asthma exacerbations," Dr.
Jonathan A. Bernstein, of the University of Cincinnati College of
Medicine, told Reuters Health. "So we wanted to see what was going on
in the general population (because) obviously people clean their
homes." (Reuters Health)
Wonder how the rates would compare with people who don't clean
their homes?
Hair
dyes not linked to multiple myeloma risk - NEW YORK - Women who've
used hair dyes, even for decades, do not seem to have an elevated risk of
multiple myeloma, a cancer in which malignant plasma cells accumulate in
the bone marrow, a new U.S. study suggests.
In recent years, some studies have linked the use of hair dyes -- in
particular, older formulations used before the 1980s -- to an elevated
risk of certain cancers, including lymphoma, (lymph cell cancer) and
leukemia (blood cell cancer).
A few risk factors for multiple myeloma have been established, such as
older age and African-American background, but some studies have suggested
that hairdressers and cosmetologists may also have a higher-than-normal
risk. (Reuters Health)
"Cello
scrotum" -- the truth at last - LONDON - "Cello
scrotum," a nasty ailment allegedly suffered by musicians, does not
exist and the condition was just a hoax, a senior British doctor has
admitted.
Back in 1974, in a letter to the British Medical Journal, Elaine Murphy
reported that cellists suffered from the painful complaint caused by their
instrument repeatedly rubbing against their body.
The claim had been inspired by reports in the BMJ about the alleged
condition guitar nipple, caused by irritation when the guitar was pressed
against the chest.
But Murphy, now a Baroness and a former Professor of Psychiatry of Old Age
at Guy's Hospital in London, has admitted her supposed medical complaint
was a spoof.
"Perhaps after 34 years it's time for us to confess we invented cello
scrotum," she wrote with her husband John, who had signed the
original letter, which was published in the BMJ Wednesday.
"Anyone who has ever watched a cello being played would realize the
physical impossibility of our claim."
Murphy, who said the couple had been "dining out" on their story
ever since they made it up, said they had decided to reveal the hoax after
it was referred to in a recent BMJ article on health problems associated
with making music.
She also said she suspected "guitar nipple" had been a joke.
(Reuters)
More
evidence pre-term birth tied to autism: study - WASHINGTON - A U.S.
study looking at children born more than three months prematurely provided
fresh evidence on Thursday linking pre-term birth and autism.
These children were about two to three times as likely to show signs of
autism at age 2 as measured in a standard screening tool compared to other
children, the researchers wrote in the Journal of Pediatrics.
Autism refers to a group of developmental problems known as autism
spectrum disorders that appear in early childhood and harm one's ability
to communicate and interact with others.
Its causes remain unclear, and experts have pointed to possible genetic
and environmental factors. (Reuters)
Analysis shows
exposure to ash from TVA spill could have 'severe health implications'
-- A report by Duke University scientists who analyzed water and ash
samples from last month’s coal sludge spill in eastern Tennessee
concludes that “exposure to radium- and arsenic-containing particulates
in the ash could have severe health implications” in the affected areas.
(PhysOrg.com)
She's doing her job as Governor? Imagine that... Suing
the Belugas - In October, while Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska was
campaigning to be vice president, the federal government added the beluga
whales in the state’s Cook Inlet to the endangered species list. At the
time, Governor Palin opposed the listing, saying it would be
“premature.” (She said the same thing about protecting polar bears.)
Now Ms. Palin has announced that she will sue to remove the whales from
the protection of the Endangered Species Act.
In Governor Palin’s view, what is really endangered is Alaska’s
economic growth. Cook Inlet, the long arm of water that reaches toward
Anchorage from the Gulf of Alaska, is one of the busiest and
fastest-developing regions in the state. There are plans for gas and oil
development, an expansion of the Port of Anchorage, as well as a possible
new bridge. (New York Times)
Snow Study Shows California
Faces Historic Drought - SAN FRANCISCO - A new survey of California
winter snows on Thursday showed the most populous state is facing one of
the worst droughts in its history, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said.
The state, which produces about half the United States' vegetables and
fruit, is in its third year of drought and its main system supplying water
to cities and farms may only be able to fulfill 15 percent of requests,
scientists said.
The snowpack on California's mountains is carrying only 61 percent of the
water of normal years, according to the survey by the state Department of
Water Resources. Last year the snowpack held 111 percent of the normal
amount of water, but spring was the driest ever recorded. (Reuters)
Scientists examine
effect of wolves' absence and see an ecosystem 'unraveling' - No trace
remains of the wolves whose howls ricocheted for millennia down the lush
valleys of the Olympic Peninsula. Settlers and trappers killed them all in
little more than three decades.
But the loss of the stealthy predators in the early 1900s left a hole in
the landscape that scientists say they are just beginning to grasp. The
ripples extend throughout what is now Olympic National Park, leading to a
boom in elk populations, overbrowsing of shrubs and trees, and erosion so
severe it has altered the very nature of the rivers, says a team of Oregon
State University biologists. The result, they argue, is an environment
that is less rich, less resilient and - perhaps - in peril.
"We think this ecosystem is unraveling in the absence of
wolves," said OSU ecologist William Ripple.
Everything from salmon to songbirds could feel the fallout from the
missing predators, the scientists say.
It sounds hard to believe, but the research adds to growing evidence that
key predators do more than simply keep prey species in check. Most
famously, Ripple and his OSU colleague Robert Beschta showed that within
three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park
and elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding.
Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish
and birds.
It was an "explosive" discovery, said David Graber, regional
chief scientist for the National Park Service. "The whole ecosystem
re-sorted itself after those wolf populations got large enough."
(Seattle Times)
What we don’t
know still hurts us, environmental researchers warn - Knowledge gaps
continue to hobble scientists' assessments of the environment, a Michigan
State University researcher and colleagues warn. Their warning follows
sobering conclusions drawn from what they do know and could help set the
global agenda for research funding in the years to come. (Michigan State
University)
Translation: we want more money to run ridiculous environmental
scares.
Blood
test may screen for mad cow disease - WASHINGTON - Researchers at the
University of Calgary have developed a blood test that can diagnose fatal
chronic wasting disease in elk, and believe it may provide a cheap way to
screen cattle for mad cow disease.
The test looks for signs of damaged cells in the blood, they reported in
the journal Nucleic Acids Research. It may also offer a way to diagnose
people with a related disease called Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, or CJD,
they said on Thursday. (Reuters)
Liberian Army Worms Threaten
W. Africa Plague: FAO - LIBERIA - A plague of hungry caterpillars
known as army worms has eaten crops and plants in 100 Liberian villages
and may spread across West Africa if left unchecked, the U.N. Food and
Agriculture Organization said on Thursday.
Liberia, ravaged by a 14-year civil war that ended in 2003, declared a
national state of emergency this week due to the army worms, a type of
moth caterpillar which grows to 5 cm (2 inches) long and can swarm to
destroy large swathes of vegetation.
Millions of the caterpillars have stripped fields and polluted wells and
streams with their excrement in Bong County, northeast of Liberia's
capital Monrovia.
The Rome-based FAO said six communities across the border in neighboring
Guinea had already been hit by the army worms.
Large tracts of West Africa were at risk, it said, particularly when the
caterpillars, now burrowing underground to form cocoons, emerged as adult
moths. (Reuters)
January 29, 2009
Obama's Oval Office Hypocrisy - The New
York Times reported
this morning that,
The capital flew into a bit of a tizzy when, on his first full day in
the White House, President Obama was photographed in the Oval Office
without his suit jacket. There was, however, a logical explanation: Mr.
Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.
"He's from Hawaii, O.K.?" said Mr. Obama's senior adviser,
David Axelrod, who occupies the small but strategically located office
next door to his boss. "He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in
there."
Could this be the same Barack Obama who said last May that,
"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our
homes on 72 degrees at all times... and then just expect that other
countries are going to say "OK"... That's not leadership.
That's not going to happen."
And could this be the same Barack Obama who is looking to sign a stimulus
bill that would spend billions of dollars installing millions of
"smart meters" that would enable your power company to prevent
you from being as comfortable as Bambi on hot and cold days?
While Bambi is warm-and-toasty in the Oval Office, is he considering
the plight of Michigan's Marvin
Schur, a 93-year World War II veteran, who was recently found frozen
to death courtesy of a malfunctioning electricity "limiter"
device installed by his power company?
Change has come to Washington. Elitism is dead. Long live elitism.
What do you believe? We've
Arrived at a Moment of Decision - We are here today to talk about how
we as Americans and how the United States of America as part of the global
community should address the dangerous and growing threat of the climate
crisis.
We have arrived at a moment of decision. Our home - Earth - is in grave
danger. What is at risk of being destroyed is not the planet itself, of
course, but the conditions that have made it hospitable for human beings.
Moreover, we must face up to this urgent and unprecedented threat to the
existence of our civilization at a time when our country must
simultaneously solve two other worsening crises. Our economy is in its
deepest recession since the 1930s. And our national security is endangered
by a vicious terrorist network and the complex challenge of ending the war
in Iraq honorably while winning the military and political struggle in
Afghanistan.
As we search for solutions to all three of these challenges, it is
becoming clearer that they are linked by a common thread - our dangerous
over-reliance on carbon-based fuels. (Al Gore)
Hands up those who think Al actually believes this crap. Now how many
think he shovels this purely as part of a personal enrichment scheme?
No
Scientific Forecasts to Support Global Warming - YESTERDAY, a former
chief at NASA, Dr John S. Theon, slammed the computer models used to
determine future climate claiming they are not scientific in part because
the modellers have “resisted making their work transparent so that it
can be replicated independently by other scientists”.
Today, a founder of the International Journal of Forecasting, Journal of
Forecasting, International Institute of Forecasters, and International
Symposium on Forecasting, and the author of Long-range Forecasting (1978,
1985), the Principles of Forecasting Handbook, and over 70 papers on
forecasting, Dr J. Scott Armstrong, tabled a statement declaring that the
forecasting process used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) lacks a scientific basis. [2]
What these two authorities, Drs Theon and Armstrong, are independently and
explicitly stating is that the computer models underpinning the work of
many scientific institutions concerned with global warming, including
Australia’s CSIRO, are fundamentally flawed. (Jennifer Marohasy)
Here's a really good question:
Frederick T. Dykes
##### Richland Valley Drive
Great Falls, Virginia 22066-1411
Phone: ### ###-####, Email: *******@*****.***
January 28, 2009
The Honorable Lisa Jackson
Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Pursuant to the rights granted under the Freedom of Information Act, Title
5 of the United State Code section 552 (“FOIA”), I hereby request the
following information:
Evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) is harmful to the environment and that
carbon dioxide is the predominant driver of climate change. Following this
paragraph, I present reasons why I do not think that carbon dioxide is
harmful to our environment and is not the predominant driver of climate
change. I request evidence that disproves each of these statements.
“Evidence” does not include computer models that try to forecast
temperatures for years, decades or a century into the future.
Our computer models do not model impacts on the climate by thunderstorms,
volcanos, or impacts by meteorites and cannot forecast temperatures to
within 1degree Fahrenheit for one month into the future and certainly not
for a century into the future.
I hereby request evidence disproving the following statements that I
believe to be true:
1. Water vapor is the prevailing greenhouse gas and retains heat more than
all other gasses combined. Without the greenhouse effect, the average
temperature of Planet Earth would be below zero.
2. Plants need CO2 to grow. Wood charcoal is mainly carbon that trees
extracted from carbon dioxide in the air. CO2 is what actually greens
Planet Earth.
3. Plants grow faster in higher concentrations of CO2 and extract more CO2
from the air. Many operators of commercial greenhouses add CO2 to the
ambient air which increases plant growth.
4. Man generates 3 billion tons of CO2 annually while plants absorb 75
billion tons of CO2 annually. Plants need all the anthropogenic
(man-generated) CO2 plus an additional 72 billion tons of CO2 from natural
sources including the oceans
5. The oceans hold 39,000 billion tons of CO2. In high latitudes, cold
water adsorbs more CO2 than it expels. In low latitudes, warm water expels
more CO2 that it adsorbs.
6. If the oceans release just .000077 of their CO2, that is more than all
man-generated CO2.
7. NASA found that the atmosphere of Mars is 95% CO2 and is not effective
at retaining heat from the Sun. If an atmosphere of 95% CO2 on Mars is not
an effective greenhouse gas, why would less than ½ of 1 percent of CO2 on
Earth be an effective greenhouse gas and be the controlling factor for
climate change?
8. Some people who claim that CO2 causes global warming use a graph that
shows correlation between global temperature and the concentration of CO2
in the atmosphere over thousands of years. The point they miss is that the
warming occurred hundreds of years before the increase of CO2. Increased
CO2 did not cause warming that occurred hundreds of years earlier.
I agree to pay processing fees for this request up to $ 100.00. If there
are additional costs, please notify me and get my agreement to pay before
incurring such costs.
If you need additional information about the requested items, please
contact me at the above address Also, I ask that if for any reason you
deny my request or withhold certain information, that you:
1. Provide a list of the denied or withheld materials,
2. Justify these deletions and withholdings by referencing specific
exemption in the FOIA, and
3. Release all parts of the withheld material that are not exempt and can
be released under the FOIA.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.
Respectfully,
Frederick T. Dykes
Copies to: President Obama; all U.S. Senators; all Members of the House of
Representatives; The Democratic National Committee; the Republican
National Committee; Association of International Automobile Manufacturers;
Ford Motor Company; General Motors Corp; Chrysler Corp; Charles
Krauthammer, The Washington Post; Peter Baker, The New York Times; The
Washington Times; Kimberley Strassel, The Wall Street Journal; National
Review; The Weekly Standard; ABC; CBS; NBC; Fox News; Glen Beck; Monica
Crowley; Sean Hannity.
Recycling
'could be adding to global warming' - Recycling could be adding to
global warming rather than reducing it, a key government adviser on waste
management has said.
Peter Jones suggested that much of the country's waste should simply be
burnt to generate electricity Photo: PA
Peter Jones suggested that an "urgent" review of Labour's policy
on recycling was needed to make sure the collection, transportation and
processing of recyclable material was not causing a net increase in
greenhouse gases.
Mr Jones, a former director of the waste firm Biffa and now an adviser to
environment ministers and the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, also dismissed
kerbside recycling collections in many areas as "stupid" because
they mixed together different materials, rendering them useless for
recycling.
He suggested that much of the country's waste should simply be burnt to
generate electricity.
"It might be that the global warming impact of putting material
through an incinerator five miles down the road is actually less than
recycling it 3,000 miles away," he said. (Daily Telegraph)
He's quite right about the majority of recycling being a stupid waste
of everyone's time and effort, not to mention energy but worrying over
gorebull warming is the wrong justification for anything.
Britain's
big polluters accused of abusing EU's carbon trading scheme - Smoke
from a factory chimney. Carbon trading is leading to the use of more
polluting fossil fuels. Photograph: Joel W. Rogers/Corbis
Britain's biggest polluting companies are abusing a European emissions
trading scheme (ETS) designed to tackle global warming by cashing in their
carbon credits in order to bolster ailing balance sheets.
The sell-off has helped trigger a collapse in the price of carbon, making
it cheaper to burn high-carbon fossil fuels and leading to a fall in the
number of clean energy projects. The moves were seized on by
environmentalists and other critics who have previously criticised the
European Union's ETS for delivering more windfall profits for business
than climate change. (The Guardian)
Success! Europe
proposes global carbon market - The European Commission, the governing
body of the European Union, has proposed the creation of a global carbon
market and called for more vigorous carbon reduction targets, leaving
Canada’s reduction target behind.
The Commission set out its environmental objectives yesterday, urging
developed countries to cut carbon emissions by 30% from 1990 levels by
2020 to limit global warming to 2°C. The target is a step ahead of
Canada’s plan to reduce emissions by 20% of 1990 levels by the same
time. However, Canada’s goals remain in line with the EC’s longer-term
objective to cut emissions by 50% by 2050. (Financial Post)
Given that humans cannot raise the planet's temperature by 2 °C
through emission of any amount of carbon dioxide the proposed limits
have succeeded even prior to imposition. How good are they?
Europe
to U.S.: You’re a Big Polluter - Now that George W. Bush has left
the White House, European Union leaders are piling pressure on President
Barack Obama to adopt regulations on climate change.
The ideal scenario for Europe would be for the United States quickly to
establish a system to cap and trade carbon dioxide, and then pledge to put
pressure on other rich countries to do the same thing.
The European Union already has adopted potentially costly policies that
could hurt the trade bloc’s industrial competitiveness. If the United
States resists that model, or delays action, Europe’s policies could
lose their legitimacy.
Another consideration for Europe is to break free of the relative
isolation it experienced in international negotiations during the Bush
years. Many European leaders want to go to the next round of talks in
Copenhagen ten months from now working in tandem with the Americans to
push other nations to cut emissions. (James Kanter, New York Times)
Geography
Is Dividing Democrats Over Energy - WASHINGTON — President Obama is
moving quickly to act on the environmental promises that were a
centerpiece of his campaign. But tackling global warming will be far more
difficult — and more costly — than the new emissions standards for
automobiles he ordered with the stroke of a pen on Monday.
Already, the Congressional Democrats Mr. Obama will need to carry out his
mandate are feuding with one another.
By coincidence or design, most of the policy makers on Capitol Hill and in
the administration charged with shaping legislation to address global
warming come from California or the East Coast, regions that lead the
country in environmental regulation and the push for renewable energy
sources.
That is a problem, says a group of Democratic lawmakers from the Midwest
and Plains States, which are heavily dependent on coal and manufacturing.
The lawmakers have banded together to fight legislation they think might
further damage their economies.
“There’s a bias in our Congress and government against manufacturing,
or at least indifference to us, especially on the coasts,” said Senator
Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio. “It’s up to those of us in the
Midwest to show how important manufacturing is. If we pass a climate bill
the wrong way, it will hurt American jobs and the American economy, as
more and more production jobs go to places like China, where it’s
cheaper.”
This brown state-green state clash is likely to encumber any effort to set
a mandatory ceiling on the carbon dioxide emissions blamed as the biggest
contributor to global warming, something Mr. Obama has declared to be one
of his highest priorities. Mr. Obama has said he intends to press ahead on
such an initiative, despite opposition within his own party in Congress
and divisions among some of his advisers over the timing, scope and cost
of legislation to curb carbon emissions. (New York Times)
Submitted
Paper “Assessment Of Temperature Trends In The Troposphere Deduced From
Thermal Winds By Pielke Sr. Et Al - Yesterday, Climate Audit announced
the submission of a paper on tropospheric temperature trends (see).
We have also submitted a paper which relates to his study. It is Pielke
Sr., R.A., T.N. Chase, J.R. Christy, B. Herman, and J.J. Hnilo, 2009:
Assessment of temperature trends in the troposphere deduced from thermal
winds. Int. J. Climatol., submitted
“Recent work has concluded that there has been significant warming in
the tropical upper troposphere using the thermal wind equation to diagnose
temperature trends from observed winds; a result which diverges from all
other observational data. In our paper we examine evidence for this
conclusion from a variety of directions and find that evidence for a
significant tropical tropospheric warming is weak. In support of this
conclusion we provide evidence that, for the period 1979-2007, except for
the highest latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, both the thermal wind,
as estimated by the zonal averaged 200 hPa wind and the tropospheric
layer-averaged temperature, are consistent with each other, and show no
statistically significant trends.” (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Oh dear... New
Paper on the Economics of Air Capture - I have a paper in press on the
economics of the air capture of carbon dioxide. Here are the details:
Pielke, Jr. R. A. 2009 (in press). An Idealized Assessment of the
Economics of Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide in Mitigation Policy,
Environmental Science & Policy.
Abstract
This paper discusses the technology of direct capture of carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere called air capture. It develops a simple arithmetic
description of the magnitude of the challenge of stabilizing atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide as a cumulative allocation over the 21st
century. This approach, consistent with and based on the work of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, sets the stage for an analysis
of the average costs of air capture over the 21st century under the
assumption that technologies available today are used to fully offset net
human emissions of carbon dioxide. The simple assessment finds that even
at a relatively high cost per ton of carbon, the costs of air capture are
directly comparable to the costs of stabilization using other means as
presented by recent reports of the IPCC and the Stern Review Report.
For a pre-publication copy when proofs arrive (I expect them next week)
please contact pielke@colorado.edu. (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
... we are prepared to bet this operates under the mistaken premise
there is some advantage in reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide (aCO2)
levels rather than recognizing aCO2 as a major resource and
its accidental increase a significant benefit. In fact, from a biosphere
perspective any loss (sequestration) of carbon from the active cycle is
a cost to be avoided and any addition (restoration) to the available
pool is a profit.
Now
Revkin is a Denier - Maybe Joe Romm’s employers over at the Center
for American Progress have a vision for how his tantrums and fits serve
their interests on advancing climate policy. I certainly can’t see how
his antics do anything more than paint the CAP as a hotbed for intolerance
and ignorance. In Joe’s latest rant he calls the NYTs Andy Revkin a
climate denier, or I think he does, as Joe speaks a language unto himself.
Here is an excerpt (emphasis added): (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Oops! Columbia struck a more skeptical response than they expected: Cool
on Global Warming - The Fall issue of Columbia prompted dozens of
letters disputing the cover article’s central premise — that climate
scientists agree the earth’s atmosphere is warming because of human
activity. Many readers proposed instead that natural factors, such as
sunspots or variations in the earth’s orbit, are warming the atmosphere.
(Columbia Magazine)
The
turning point—it’s becoming chic to be a skeptic - This must be
it, surely, the point where being a skeptic has more scientific cachet
than being a believer. The trickle is becoming a flood. We are reaching
the stage where independent scientists will want to make sure they are
known to be on the skeptical side of the fence. (Joanne Nova)
What
is Science’s Rightful Place? - ScienceBlogs wants to answer the
above question in light of the following phrase from the President’s
inaugural address:
“We will restore science to its rightful place”
Never mind that the phrasing suggests this rightful place existed at some
time in the past, the folks at Scienceblogs and SEED Magazine are
soliciting contributions of what is the rightful place for science. Watch
the wishful thinking take flight. (David Bruggeman, Prometheus)
Government
officials were overruled by UN on CCS - British government fought to
have Carbon Capture and Storage included in clean development mechanism
British government officials pushed heavily for Carbon Capture and Storage
(CCS) technology to be included in the clean development mechanism (CDM)
at recent climate change talks in Poznan, but were overruled by the United
Nations.
The CDM allows developed countries to invest in an emissions reduction
scheme in the developing world in return for carbon credits that count
towards emissions targets.
Bronwen Northmore, director of the cleaner fossil fuels policy group
within the Department of Energy and Climate Change, said that the
developing world needed a mechanism to finance CCS projects – which take
carbon emissions from dirty power stations and stores them underground –
as they couldn't afford to develop the technology themselves.
"We fought to get CCS included in the CDM but unfortunately weren't
successful," she said in a speech to the World Future Energy Summit
last week.
"We need a robust financing mechanism for CCS in developing
countries, whether it is the CDM or something else." (Tom Young,
BusinessGreen)
No, that's wrong. We don't need or want CCS, ever. What
carbon capture and storage (sequestration) really is is the waste of a
magnificent resource and who wants to do that, especially as that waste
involves a massive squandering of energy to achieve in the first place?
Plain bad idea, no matter how it's viewed.
How
Kyoto credit scams work - When it comes to throwing people in the
Third World off their land, nothing works better than building hydro dams
-- dams have displaced several million in the last decade alone, typically
without fairly compensating its victims. And when it comes to financing
hydro dams, nothing these days works better than carbon credits, the
mechanism of choice for many who want to counter climate change. (Lawrence
Solomon, Financial Post)
Not stuck, just can't move: Trapped
with icebreaker, cruise passengers party - Coast Guard downplays its
vessel's problems, but passenger says the Terry Fox not up to the job
MONTREAL–It wasn't something they had expected, getting stuck in the
thick ice of the St. Lawrence River. Nor did the 300 guests aboard the
Vacancier cruise ship expect the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker that came
to get them out would suffer the same fate.
But the Canadian Coast Guard ship Terry Fox, considered one of Canada's
two "heavy" icebreakers, did get caught in the ice, leading some
to wonder whether the Coast Guard has adequate icebreaking capabilities,
given that Canada is an Arctic country. (Toronto Star)
Interior
Secretary Says Open To New Offshore Drilling - WASHINGTON - U.S.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said on Wednesday the Obama administration
was open to oil drilling in new offshore areas as part of a comprehensive
plan to overhaul U.S. energy policy.
But he would not specify which tracts could be opened to energy
exploration.
"As we move forward with the development of our oil and gas
resources, both on-shore and off-shore, they have to be part of a set of a
comprehensive energy program," Salazar told reporters at the White
House.
"There are places where it is appropriate to explore and to develop
oil and gas resources, and there are places that are not
appropriate," Salazar said. (Reuters)
Car
industry to fight Barack Obama's green proposals - Car industry groups
are gearing up for a long fight and the likelihood of legal action against
proposals by President Barack Obama to allow California and other states
to set their own regulations on greenhouse gas emission from vehicles.
(Daily Telegraph)
California Takes
Aim At Big, Energy-Hungry TVs - LOS ANGELES - California may be still
waiting for the go-ahead to force higher fuel economy in its cars, but the
Golden State is moving to crack down on a less obvious energy glutton --
the television set.
As television screens grow steadily in size and numbers, sucking more
juice from the U.S. power grid, California regulators has crafted the
nation's first mandatory energy curbs on TVs -- and meeting resistance
from the industry that makes them.
Having pioneered energy-efficiency rules over the past 30 years for
appliances and gadgets ranging from refrigerators to cell-phone chargers,
the California Energy Commission has now turned to TVs, which account for
10 percent of home electric bills in the state. (Reuters)
Coal:
China’s Energy Pillar - China has experienced huge change over the
past 30 years. But even amidst that change, coal has been the pillar of
the country’s energy sector and its dominance will likely continue for
the next 30 years. And that will be true even though coal is exacting a
heavy toll in terms of pollution, land destruction, and human health.
Ever since 1978, when Deng Xiaoping launched the economic reforms, coal
has been dominant. Without it, Chinese industry would literally grind to a
halt. This year, coal will account for about 75 percent of industrial fuel
use, 76 percent of electricity generation, 80 percent of civil and
commercial energy, and 60 percent of chemical feedstock. (Lee Geng and
Michael J. Economides, Energy Tribune)
Europe's
Pipeline War - The most recent conflict between Moscow and Kiev over
natural gas supplies has reignited the controversy over new transit
routes. Europe could get its future gas from the highly controversial Nord
Stream pipeline to the north, or via the Nabucco pipeline to the south.
But will either ever get built? (Der Spiegel)
Severn
Barrage is environmental balancing act - Whichever, if any, tidal
scheme is built on the Severn, it is sure to anger some environmentalists.
Being a renewable source of electricity, tidal generators might be assumed
to be popular with the green lobby. Yet there are serious reservations
over the environmental costs of a barrage or lagoon in the estuary — and
they have split the environmentalist movement.
On the one hand there is the appeal of doing something positive about
climate change by turning to a renewable, rather than burnable, source of
energy. Environmental activists have been urging governments, power
companies and the public to embrace renewable energy because it is cleaner
than fossil fuels and nuclear power.
On the other hand, thousands of hectares of shoreline will be destroyed as
a feeding ground for birds — an internationally important feeding
ground, no less.
There are also deep concerns about the impact on the fish and
invertebrates in the Severn. Barrages and, to a lesser extent, lagoons
form a physical barrier to species such as salmon and eels as they
migrate. (The Times)
Third
Heathrow runway would scupper Stansted and Glasgow expansion - A new
runway at Heathrow would result in every other British airport having to
abandon expansion plans to meet the Government’s climate change target,
a study has suggested.
The increase in carbon dioxide emissions from an enlarged Heathrow would
be so great that other airports might be forced to cut thousands of
flights a year to avoid a breach of the target. That could mean scrapping
new runways at Stansted and in Scotland. (The Times)
It won't but it just might help bring down the carbon dioxide farce.
Plans
for thousands of wind turbines and tidal barrage threatened by costs -
Ambitious plans to build thousands of wind turbines off the coast of
Britain and a controversial tidal barrage may never be realised due to
environmental concerns and spiralling costs, according to energy experts.
(Daily Telegraph)
Chill
wind as companies pull out of projects - The UK is losing its
attraction for renewable energy generators, putting future energy security
and the government's climate change targets in jeopardy, Lord Smith has
told the Financial Times in an interview.
The chairman of the Environment Agency said he was concerned about several
recent announcements from big energy companies that they were
reconsidering plans for offshore wind farms.
"I'm very worried by the fact that a number of companies have said
they are no longer actively considering major schemes in the UK," he
said. (Financial Times)
Studies Find
Mercury In Much U.S. Corn Syrup - WASHINGTON - Many common foods made
using commercial high fructose corn syrup contain mercury as well,
researchers reported on Tuesday, while another study suggested the corn
syrup itself is contaminated.
Food processors and the corn syrup industry group attacked the findings as
flawed and outdated, but the researchers said it was important for people
to know about any potential sources of the toxic metal in their food.
(Reuters)
The
latest Scare du Jour: mercury in HFCS - Our bodies are designed and
have adapted to thrive on the planet earth. As such, our bodies naturally
detoxify and can deal with elements, minerals, chemicals and even bugs,
found naturally in our foods and environment. We’re made of tough stuff
and not nearly as wimpy and vulnerable as some want us to fear. That
resilience is a good thing for the survival of the human species!
There will always be people who try to scare us about some food (it’s
always something they don’t think we should eat) by telling us a small
amount of some “toxin” — or “neurotoxin” (that sounds even
scarier) — has been detected. This is our heads up that we are being
manipulated and someone’s trying to take advantage of the fact a lot of
people think a chemical or toxin means danger. (Junkfood Science)
Still not rating season? Cured
meats tied to childhood leukemia risk - NEW YORK - Children who
regularly eat cured meats like bacon and hot dogs may have a heightened
risk of leukemia, while vegetables and soy products may help protect
against cancer, a new study suggests.
Researchers found that among 515 Taiwanese children and teenagers with and
without acute leukemia, those who ate cured meats and fish more than once
a week had a 74 percent higher risk of leukemia than those who rarely ate
these foods.
On the other hand, kids who often ate vegetables and soy products, like
tofu, had about half the leukemia risk of their peers who shunned
vegetables and soy.
The findings, reported in the online journal BMC Cancer, point to an
association between these foods and leukemia risk - but do not prove
cause-and-effect. (Reuters Health)
Or, even more likely, these 'results' point to the outcome desired by
the anti-meat mobs who fund this kind of dredge.
Want
to get healthy? Exercise 7 minutes a week - LONDON - Rigorous workouts
lasting as little as three minutes may help prevent diabetes by helping
control blood sugar, British researchers said on Wednesday.
The findings published in the journal BioMed Central Endocrine Disorders
suggest that people unable to meet government guidelines calling for
moderate to vigorous exercise several hours per week can still benefit
from exercise.
"This is such a brief amount of exercise you can do it without
breaking a sweat," said James Timmons, an exercise biologist at
Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, who led the study.
"You can make just as big as an effect doing this as you can by doing
hours and hours of endurance training each week." (Reuters)
Plastic
chemical may stay in body longer: study - WASHINGTON - A controversial
chemical used in many plastic products may remain in the body longer than
previously thought, and people may be ingesting it from sources other than
food, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December said it planned more
research into the safety of bisphenol A, or BPA, but the agency indicated
no immediate plans to curb the chemical, found in baby bottles and other
products. (Reuters)
Reminding us intimidation attempts extend far beyond gorebull
warming: Scientists
threatened with prosecution (Google translated page) - Two Swedish
researchers are threatened with prosecution after they published a
scientific article that condemns the use of lie detectors. The company
Nemesysco, which manufactures detectors, writes in a letter to the
researchers publishers that they can be sued for libel if the writing on
the subject again. (STHLM) -- h/t Niclas S. Engberg
Science News: Super Mario Gravity, inter alia, from slate V:
Anti-capitalist Sachs is at it again: Rewriting
the rulebook for 21st-century capitalism - Technology is at the core
of Obama's plans for a sustainable future. In this new era of public
action, the US is back in the lead
One of President Barack Obama's historic contributions will be a grand act
of policy jujitsu - turning the crushing economic crisis into the launch
of a new age of sustainable development. His macroeconomic stimulus may or
may not cushion the recession, and bitter partisan fights over priorities
no doubt lie ahead. But Obama is already setting a new historic course by
reorienting the economy from private consumption to public investments
directed at the great challenges of energy, climate, food production,
water and biodiversity. (Jeffrey Sachs, The Guardian)
Senator
Warns White House Will 'Create Crisis' and 'Panic' to Push Stimulus -
Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., criticizes mainstream media for not reporting
loads of pork in proposed legislation.
Is the new Obama administration taking cues from the Bush administration
to get Congress to act? It certainly seemed that way to, South
Carolina’s junior Republican senator, Jim DeMint.
DeMint, speaking Jan. 27 at The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.,
explained the Obama administration will “create crisis and widespread
panic” just like its predecessor in order to get Congress to act
expeditiously.
“I’ve been around long enough to know whenever someone tells me I have
to make a decision right now, my response is no,” DeMint said. “That
clears it up right away and I think more and more the Bush administration
and now this administration knows that they’re not going to get a quick
reaction out of Congress unless they create crisis and widespread panic.
And that’s going to be their M.O. to get Congress to act.” (Jeff Poor,
Business & Media Institute)
Ireland
faces fines if food waste not recycled, EPA warns - Diverting food
waste from landfill must become the main waste management priority if
Ireland is to avoid EU sanctions, the Environmental Protection Agency has
said.
In a new report today, the environmental watchdog said the amount of
biodegradable municipal waste disposed of to landfill increased by 5 per
cent to 1,485,968 tonnes in 2007, leaving Ireland in “danger” of
missing its EU targets.
According to the agency, the increase in food waste is moving Ireland
further from the first Landfill Directive target of less than one million
tonnes of biodegradable municipal waste to be landfilled in 2010.
Under the 1999 EU landfill directive, Ireland will be fined if it fails to
meet the target, and at present, 50 per cent more biodegradable waste,
including food and garden waste, paper, cardboard, wood and textiles, is
being sent to landfill than the target level for 2010. (Irish Times)
Where do they get this nonsense? CLIMATE
CHANGE: Tropical Forests Fight for Survival - UXBRIDGE, Canada, Jan 28
- Current rates of deforestation suggest there will hardly be any tropical
forests left in 20 years. Sixty percent of the rainforests, which survived
for 50 million consecutive years, are already gone. (IPS)
Where tropical forests now stand mostly dry savannah existed just
12,000 years ago, where would forests have existed for 50 million
consecutive years and still exist today? Certainly they can't be talking
about northern boreal forests, they were under a mile of ice for much of
the last 100,000 years. Granted Antarctica once had rainforests but
that's going back a few million years and people can't really be blamed
for their loss either.
Moreover, as anyone who has tried to wrest a living by clearing land
for agriculture knows, forests are resilient, constantly infiltrating
and reclaiming cleared areas. The only way we could get rid of tropical
forests in 20 years would be to nuke the damn things, something neither
likely nor recommended.
Exceptionally absurd piece, even for Stephen Leahy.
Key Food, Biofuel
Crop Sorghum's Genome Deciphered - WASHINGTON - Scientists have
deciphered the genetic make-up of sorghum, a drought-tolerant crop and
important food and biofuel source, and said the breakthrough could help
develop better crops for arid regions.
Sorghum is one of the world's leading cereals, along with corn, wheat,
oats and barley, and can thrive in hot, dry conditions other crops cannot
tolerate.
An international scientific team, writing in the journal Nature on
Wednesday, mapped the genome which includes about 30,000 genes.
They said this new understanding could point to ways of creating even more
drought-tolerant types while providing a blueprint for developing, through
breeding or genetic engineering, improved forms of other crops such as
corn. (Reuters)
January 28, 2009
James
Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic - Says Hansen
‘Embarrassed NASA’ & ‘Was Never Muzzled’
Washington DC: NASA warming scientist James Hansen, one of former
Vice-President Al Gore’s closest allies in the promotion of man-made
global warming fears, is being publicly rebuked by his former supervisor
at NASA.
Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, the former
supervisor of James Hansen, NASA’s vocal man-made global warming fear
soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that
Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate claims and said
Hansen was “was never muzzled.” Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks
of international scientists abandoning the promotion of man-made global
warming fears. (E&PW)
Breakthrough!
By Sir Hugh Jerrors, Professor of Modelling Those Little Fluffy Bits Round
The Edges Of Clouds at the Metropolitan University of Nether Wallop
What splendid news that President Obama is to give $140,000,000 to the
climate modelling industry. That a man who has shown such wisdom
throughout his presidency should recognise the importance of this vital
economic activity must be a blow to the two or three remaining denialists,
who are able to make so much noise thanks to heavy funding from the fossil
fuel industry.
Climate modelling has provided employment to hundreds of highly-skilled
workers. They, in turn, by their purchasing power provide stimulus to
strained local economies in areas such as East Anglia . Also, they will
inspire a new stream of university graduates, all highly skilled additions
to the new industrial scene, thereby reducing unemployment. They will
certainly deserve the large bonuses that are no doubt in the offing.
Doubters might think the move is unnecessary, as we all know what the
outcome of the modelling will be, but it is not just enough to know that
catastrophe is on the way unless we dismantle most of our existing
industries. The extent of the catastrophe has to be known to greater and
greater precision. As humankind advances towards a new dawn of zero-energy
economics, it is the modellers who are in the van.
Climate modelling is the ideal industry for the modern world. Admittedly,
its super-computers are responsible for certain carbon emissions, but
these are easily offset by purchasing credits from Mr Gore. It is an
industry that creates no waste, noise or even products, to sully our
planet, which it is destined to save. It does not clog up the transport
systems with the unpleasant consequences of trade. It is clean, green and
inoffensive.
Let us hope that other nations, and particularly the UK , will seek to
emulate the foresight of the American taxpayers, who have willingly made
this generous investment in the future. How grateful their grandchildren
will be, when they are able to see the outputs of the models during
climate change lessons!
This is the start of a brave new world, in which national economies are
decoupled from the sordid activities of manufacture and trade. Let us go
forward, hand in hand, towards that Promised Land. (Number Watch)
activism.plc@gov.ac.uk
- At the risk of getting all Exxon-Secrets ‘on yo asses’… Thanks to
the reader who let us know about Bob Ward’s latest career move. Ward, if
you remember, left his post of director of communications at the Royal
Society to join global risk analysis firm RMS as Director of Global
Science Networks. It was a perfectly natural progression that allowed him
to continue both his pseudo-scientific catastrophe-mongering and his
crusade against Exxon and Martin Durkin. Which he did. (Climate
Resistance)
The Green Stimulus
- The House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday voted for $20 billion in
tax breaks for wind and solar power and energy-efficiency improvements.
Since loans for new windmills have dried up, the bill tries to spur
investment by allowing an immediate 30% investment tax credit in place of
the current production tax credit taken over ten years. According to a
Reuters story, Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Chairman of the Senate
Finance Committee, today unveiled his version of the $275 billion tax cuts
that are part of the stimulus package. It includes “about $30 billion in
tax breaks and incentives aimed at creating energy jobs.” We’ll have
to wait to see how many green jobs they claim will be created by the House
and Senate tax provisions. (Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads Digest)
Obama's Expensive
Energy Medicine Is Wrong for Ailing Economy - Perhaps Obama's team of
the best and the brightest can make sense of it, but I, for one, am very
confused: How does expensive energy stimulate the economy? (William
Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Kerry
Seeks Action on Climate Pact - WASHINGTON -- Senate Foreign Relations
Committee Chairman John Kerry said Tuesday that it was "not
critical" for the U.S. to begin regulating power-plant emissions in
advance of renewed talks toward a global climate-change treaty.
The Massachusetts Democrat will be an influential player in efforts to
forge such a treaty and reshape U.S. policy on climate issues.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Sen. Kerry said that an $825
billion economic-stimulus bill making its way through Congress should
include more money for low-carbon technologies and less for "nontargeted
tax cuts" that would, he said, do little to create jobs quickly.
"We're staring at an incredible economic opportunity," he said
of the stimulus bill, "let's spend it on the right things."
(Wall Street Journal)
If you say it quickly enough... Spend
a trillion a year to save planet: report - TACKLING climate change
will be much cheaper than most governments expect, according to a major
report by global consultancy McKinsey.
Nearly $1 trillion a year would need to be invested in clean power, energy
efficiency and forestry around the world by 2030 - a huge sum but less
than most governments have predicted and much less than the expected
damage bill should climate change go unaddressed. (Sydney Morning Herald)
New
Method For Estimating The Impact Of Heterogeneous Forcing On Atmospheric
Circulations by Vukicevic et al. 2009 - Our research has shown that
the forcing of weather systems from diabatic heating by the human input of
aerosols is on the order of 60 times that of the forcing from the diabatic
heating due to the human addition of well-mixed greenhouse gases (with the
dominate gas being CO2); i.e. see Matsui, T., and R.A. Pielke Sr., 2006:
Measurement-based estimation of the spatial gradient of aerosol radiative
forcing. Geophys. Res. Letts., 33, L11813, doi:10.1029/2006GL025974.
We now have a new paper that presents a quantitative methodology to assess
the importance of this type of climate forcing. It is Vukicevic, T., R. A.
Pielke Sr., and A. Beltran-Przekurat, 2009: New Method For Estimating The
Impact Of Heterogeneous Forcing On Atmospheric Circulations. J. Geophys.
Res., doi:10.1029/2008JD010418, in press. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Just reread that: diabatic heating by the human input of aerosols
is on the order of 60 times that of the forcing from the diabatic
heating due to the human addition of well-mixed greenhouse gases (with
the dominate gas being CO2)
With carbon dioxide then accounting for perhaps 1.5% of atmospheric
warming just what does anyone expect to achieve by devastating the
global energy supply in an effort to control its emission? And why would
anyone believe climate model prognostication of massive global
warming due to carbon dioxide-driven enhanced greenhouse when carbon
dioxide is such a trivial bit player in the global climate play?
Horse feathers! Emperor
penguin 'marching to extinction by end of the century' - The Emperor
penguin is marching towards extinction because the Antarctic sea ice on
which it depends for survival is shrinking at a faster rate than the bird
is able evolve if it is to avoid disaster, a study has found.
By the end of the century there could be just 400 breeding pairs of
Emperor penguins left standing, a dramatic decline from the population
about about 6,000 breeding pairs that existed in the 1960s, scientists
estimated. (Steve Connor, The Independent)
According to Antarctic
Connection's "Wildlife
of Antarctica" the Emperors must have had something of a
population explosion: Quick facts: Population: 200,000 pairs.
That and the fact that Antarctic sea ice is increasing and has been
doing for as long as we have had satellites observing it kind of tells
you all you need to know about The Indy and its 'science editor'.
If things were different they could be, different... or not: Climate
change’s impact on invasive plants in Western US may create restoration
opportunities - Princeton, NJ – January 27, 2009 – A new study by
researchers at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public
and International Affairs has found that global climate change may lead to
the retreat of some invasive plant species in the western United States,
which could create unprecedented ecological restoration opportunities
across millions of acres throughout America. At the same time, global
warming may enable other invasive plants to spread more widely. (ScienceMode)
“Houston Chronicle”
Editorial: A Global-Warming Scare Story - Wow. Could the Houston
Chronicle have fit more distortions about climate change into a 420-word
editorial than it managed to do in its January 25th piece, “The heat is
on: New data debunk claims that global warming is hype”? It’s hard to
figure out how. (Chip Knappenberger, Master Resource)
Meteorologists
know nothing about climate change - A pretty interesting headline
isn’t that? I admit that is probably a bit more sensationalistic than
what is really called for. However, that would seem to be one of the
conclusions from the author and analyst of a recent survey. (Tony Hake,
Denver Weather Examiner)
Runaway
Climate Concerns: Man-made global warming has become an ex cathedra
doctrine that can be challenged only at great risk - For evidence of
the inertia of bureaucracy, look no further than the UN climate conference
in Poznan that concluded recently. Like a meeting in Bali last year and
another in Copenhagen in December, the aim is to go beyond the Kyoto
Protocol to try to halt global warming. This is serious stuff, since
implementing the Kyoto Protocol could possibly cost up to $180 billion
annually.
These meetings and Kyoto reflect an underlying premise promoted by the UN
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). For its part, IPCC lives
and dies by the hypothesis that human contributions to greenhouse gases
are the primary cause of climate change.
Man-made global warming has become what scientists call an ex cathedra
doctrine that, like a superstition, can be challenged at great risk to
reputation or financial support. (Christopher Lingle, Live Mint)
Germany OKs
Atlantic global warming experiment - Germany dropped its opposition
Monday to a controversial experiment to dump iron sulphate in the South
Atlantic to see if it can absorb greenhouse gases and possibly help to
halt global warming. (AFP)
Indian
scientists conduct anti-warming experiment in Antarctic Ocean - Indian
and German scientists began strewing iron powder on hundreds of square
kilometres of the Antarctic ocean in a momentous experiment that may yield
a solution to the global warming crisis.
Some environmentalists have opposed the work of Indian and German
scientists aboard the Polarstern, a German research icebreaker, but Berlin
ruled Monday the project is safe and breaks no laws. (DPA)
?!! Comet
impact theory disproved - New data, published today, disproves the
recent theory that a large comet exploded over North America 12,900 years
ago, causing a shock wave that travelled across North America at hundreds
of kilometres per hour and triggering continent-wide wildfires.
Dr Sandy Harrison from the University of Bristol and colleagues tested the
theory by examining charcoal and pollen records to assess how fire regimes
in North America changed between 15 and 10,000 years ago, a time of large
and rapid climate changes.
Their results provide no evidence for continental-scale fires, but support
the fact that the increase in large-scale wildfires in all regions of the
world during the past decade is related to an increase in global warming.
(University of Bristol)
Al
Gore’s Propaganda - The methods used by global warming alarmists to
convince you that more carbon dioxide is going to ruin the Earth are
increasingly laced with insults and attacks directed toward anyone who
might disagree with them. For instance, one of the many intellectually
lazy (& false) claims is that I am paid by Big Oil.
Mr. Gore’s tactics have been a little more subtle, and reminiscent of
propaganda methods which have proved to be effective throughout history at
influencing public opinion. One should keep in mind that his main
scientific adviser, NASA’s James Hansen, has the most extreme views of
any climate researcher when it comes to predicting a global warming
induced Armageddon.
Listed below are ten propaganda techniques I have excerpted from
Wikipedia. Beneath each are one or more examples of Mr. Gore’s rhetoric
as he has attempted to goad the rest of us into reducing our CO2
emissions. Except where indicated, most quotes are from his testimony
before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, March 21,
2007. (Mr. Gore is scheduled to testify again tomorrow, January 28, 2009,
before the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee…if the cold and snowy
weather doesn’t cause them to reschedule.) (Roy W. Spencer)
Obama,
Fight The Green Agenda - In his remarkable rise to power, President
Barack Obama has overcome some of the country's most formidable
politicians--from the Bushes and the Clintons to John McCain. But he may
have more trouble coping with a colleague he professes to admire: former
Vice President Al Gore.
To date, motivations from sweet reason to hard-headed accommodation have
defined Obama's Cabinet choices, most notably in such areas as defense and
finance. Oddly enough, though, his choices on the environmental front are
almost entirely Gore-ite in nature. Obama's green team, for example,
includes longtime Gore acolyte Carol Browner as climate and energy czar,
physicist Steven Chu as energy secretary and, perhaps most alarmingly,
John Holdren as science adviser.
These individuals are not old-style conservationists focused on cleaning
up the air and water, or protecting and expanding natural areas. They
represent a more authoritarian and apocalyptic strain of true believers
who see in environmental issues--mainly, global warming--a license to push
a radical agenda irrespective of its effects on our economy, our society
or even our dependence on foreign energy.
We should not underestimate the power of these extreme greens. They can
count on the media to cover climate and other green issues with all the
impartiality of the Soviet-era Pravda. Stories that buttress the notion of
man-made global warming--like reports of long-term warming in
Antarctica--receive lavish attention in The New York Times and on Yahoo!.
(Joel Kotkin, Forbes)
Philadelphia’s
Climate in the Early Days - Guest Post by Steven Goddard
January, 1790 was a remarkable year in the northeastern US for several
reasons. It was less than one year into George Washington’s first term,
and it was one of the warmest winter months on record. Fortunately for
science, a diligent Philadelphia resident named Charles Pierce kept a
detailed record of the monthly weather from 1790 through 1847, and his
record is archived by Google Books. Below is his monthly report from that
book. (Watts Up With That?)
The
UK Climate Impact Programme Forecasting Scoresheet - Guest Post by
Steven Goddard
The UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) is a government funded
organization with the following scientifically neutral mission statement
on their home page “The UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) helps
organisations to adapt to inevitable climate change. While it’s
essential to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of past
emissions will continue to be felt for decades.“
On their headline messages page they have a list of global warming
predictions and supporting evidence. In this article we will examine some
of their claims and evidence. (Watts Up With That?)
Humans adapting to
climate change help mosquitoes spread disease - Humans adjusting to
water shortages caused by global warming could help a dengue
fever-carrying mosquito expand into new parts of Australia, according to a
study released Tuesday. (AFP) | Hoarding
rainwater could 'dramatically' expand range of dengue-fever mosquito
(Wiley)
Actually rainwater storage tanks were once ubiquitous in Australia
but had been discouraged in favor of decent water reticulation.
Fashionable gorebull warming hysteria and misguided government policy
has seen a return of these neglected water stores but that is their only
connection to "global warming".
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
Super Rice to
Match Super Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations: In
the not-too-distant future, we will need crops that can take fullest
advantage of the yield-enhancing benefits of the ongoing rise in the air's
CO2 content. What is the outlook for rice in this
regard?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 658
individual scientists from 385
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from Owens
Valley, White Mountains, California, USA. To access the entire
Medieval Warm Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Herbivory
(General): How might it differ from what it is now in a CO2-enriched
and warmer world of the future?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Kentucky
Bluegrass, Little
Bluestem, Sundial
Lupine, and Thale
Cress.
Journal Reviews:
Global Warming and
Atlantic Hurricane Intensity: Does the former promote the latter?
Tropical
Cyclones Off the Northwestern Coast of Australia: How did their
intensities vary over the period 1968/69 to 2000/01?
The World's
Water Tower: What is it? Where is it? Why is it? And how has it
responded to the past half-century of global warming?
The Progressive
Nitrogen Limitation Hypothesis Takes Another Hit: A scrub-oak
ecosystem finds the nitrogen it needs for its growth to continue
responding to atmospheric CO2 enrichment.
Amphibian
Population Declines: Are they caused by global warming?
CO2 Truth-Alert: Elevated
CO2: How Sweet it is ... for Sugarcane!
(co2science.org)
New
science could help solve climate crisis - LONDON: A new science that
seeks to fight climate change using methods like giant space mirrors might
not work on its own, but when combined with cuts in greenhouse gases it
may help reverse global warming, a research report said.
In the report published on Wednesday, researchers at Britain's University
of East Anglia assessed the climate cooling potential of "geoengineering"
schemes that also include pumping aerosol into the atmosphere and
fertilizing the oceans with nutrients.
"We found that some geoengineering options could usefully complement
mitigation, and together they could cool the climate, but geoengineering
alone cannot solve the climate problem," said Professor Tim Lenton,
the report's lead author.
Geoengineering involves large-scale manipulation of the environment in an
attempt to combat the potentially devastating effects of increased
atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. (Reuters)
Except that improvements in the levels of magnificent resource and
essential trace gas carbon dioxide is all gain for no pain. The biggest
problem the world faces today is people wanting to "do something
about" carbon dioxide.
Nuclear
Fusion-Fission Hybrid Could Destroy Nuclear Waste And Contribute to
Carbon-Free Energy Future - AUSTIN, Texas — Physicists at The
University of Texas at Austin have designed a new system that, when fully
developed, would use fusion to eliminate most of the transuranic waste
produced by nuclear power plants.
The invention could help combat global warming by making nuclear power
cleaner and thus a more viable replacement of carbon-heavy energy sources,
such as coal. (Insciences)
I'm all for viable energy sources but the carbon fixation and reach
for gorebull warming as a justification for development costs is always
cause for great suspicion.
Britain Starts Search For New
Nuclear Build Sites - LONDON - Budding nuclear power plant builders
have two months to nominate sites for the next generation of nuclear power
stations in Britain, the government said on Tuesday.
Europe's biggest utilities, which have been clubbing together this month
in readiness to build the nuclear power plants Britain hopes will replace
an aging fleet of state built reactors, have until March 31 to submit
their site proposals.
"The industry continues to gear up to invest and we are on course to
see new nuclear feeding into the grid by 2018," Britain's Energy
Secretary Ed Miliband told the Nuclear Development Forum on Tuesday.
(Reuters)
Senators Debate Alternative
Energy Tax Breaks - WASHINGTON - The Senate Finance Committee on
Tuesday began debating some $31 billion in tax credits and financial
incentives to boost alternative energy supplies and promote energy-savings
steps as part of the Obama administration's much bigger U.S. economic
recovery plan.
The tax breaks being considered would, in part, help wind power and solar
energy companies that are having a difficult time getting financing
because of tight credit conditions. The incentives also come at time that
sharply lower petroleum prices have made alternative energy projects less
cost competitive. (Reuters)
RINO rampage: U.S.
Should Adopt California Car Rules: Schwarzenegger - SAN FRANCISCO -
California on Monday hailed President Barack Obama's move toward letting
it and other states regulate greenhouse gases from cars as an
"historic win" for clean air and said the federal government
should adopt similar national standards.
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a former Hollywood actor now a
champion of the environmental movement, said it would be a great idea for
the entire United States to follow California's lead on rules for more
efficient cars that would cut their greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent
by 2016. (Reuters)
A
bariatric patient wants other women to know… - A young nursing
assistant had sought help for a back injury five years ago, and her doctor
recommended bariatric surgery. She lost 120-pounds, but it has not been a
happy ending. Looking shockingly decades older than her real age,
malnutrition has cost her her health, her job, and most of her hair and
teeth. She and other women around Modesto believe that more attention
deserves to be given to the long-term complications of bariatric surgeries
and bravely shared their stories with the Modesto Bee this weekend.
These are the truer pictures of the pain and complications of bariatric
surgeries that those of us who’ve cared for these women see more often
than those glowing before-and-after stories in the media.
These women showed tremendous courage in opening their hearts and going
public, hoping to help other women. Their stories deserve to be heard.
Please be sure to watch Sandi’s touching video interview [halfway down
the page]. As reporter Ken Carlson wrote: (Junkfood Science)
Money
For Nothin' - California's politicians have played Russian roulette
with the state's future, nearly bankrupting it in the process. Now, it
looks like they might get bailed out from the problems they created.
The Golden State expects a record $42 billion deficit over the next year
and a half, the largest pool of red ink ever in a state. Can it plug such
a big fiscal hole? Maybe.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has pushed a wide range of new taxes — excuse
us, "fees" — on everything from golfers and car repairs to
veterinary care and tickets to sporting events. And now, the $825 billion
stimulus bill may bring billions more to California.
The stimulus will dole out about $200 billion to the states to help shore
up their budgets. California is slated to get $22 billion of that.
Is that a good thing? Probably not. It's not aid, per se; it's a bailout.
Basically, California's irresponsible, Democrat-dominated legislature has
spent the state into near fiscal oblivion. Now it will get bailed out by
its big-spending friends in Washington.
So expect more fiscal irresponsibility in California, not less. (IBD)
Real
Power In Washington Resides In Person Of Environmental Chief - Think
the most powerful person in the U.S. government is President Obama? Think
again. It reality it may be Environmental Protection Agency Chief Lisa
Jackson.
In the race for action on climate change and to curb man-made greenhouse
gases that moves swifter than the pace of legislative change, many are
turning to the EPA and the Clean Air Act, which empowered the federal
government to enforce clean air standards to improve human health and
living conditions.
If President Obama moves to classify carbon dioxide as a dangerous
pollutant to be regulated by the EPA, as he pledged during the campaign,
the change in policy could significantly alter the lives of Americans.
While the Clean Air Act has been legitimately and usefully used to combat
ozone depletion, acid rain, pollution and smog, using it to curb
greenhouse gases is about as good an idea as using a power drill to do
brain surgery. (Margo Thorning, IBD)
UN Chief Warns More Could Go
Hungry In Crisis Year - MADRID - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon on
Tuesday said rich nations had to do more to prevent the economic crisis
from adding to an already intolerable 1 billion people going hungry in the
world.
Food prices had come down for the time being but the number of hungry
people was set to rise again, Ban told the High Level Meeting on Food
Security for All in Madrid.
"Continuing hunger is a deep stain on our world. The time has come to
remove it forever. We have the wealth and know-how to do so," Ban
said.
Apparently they can recognize a real problem when they see, so what's
with all this gorebull warming hysteria nonsense that can only make
everything much worse?
Mapping
the Zone: Improving Flood Map Accuracy - Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps portray the height and extent to
which flooding is expected to occur, and they form the basis for setting
flood insurance premiums and regulating development in the floodplain. As
such, they are an important tool for individuals, businesses, communities,
and government agencies to understand and deal with flood hazard and flood
risk. Improving map accuracy is therefore not an academic question--better
maps help everyone.
Making and maintaining an accurate flood map is neither simple nor
inexpensive. Even after an investment of more than $1 billion to take
flood maps into the digital world, only 21 percent of the population has
maps that meet or exceed national flood hazard data quality thresholds.
Even when floodplains are mapped with high accuracy, land development and
natural changes to the landscape or hydrologic systems create the need for
continuous map maintenance and updates.
Mapping the Zone examines the factors that affect flood map accuracy,
assesses the benefits and costs of more accurate flood maps, and
recommends ways to improve flood mapping, communication, and management of
flood-related data. (NAP)
January 27, 2009
Obama's Inaugural
Address - President Barack Obama in his brief inaugural address on
Tuesday mentioned energy and global warming several times, but gave no
specifics. He vowed to “restore science to its rightful place,” yet
has nominated Dr. John P. Holdren to the post of White House Science
Adviser. He later faintly echoed Holdren’s Malthusianism when he said,
“…[N]or can we consume the world’s resources without regard to the
effect.” The effect of consuming the world’s resources has been
unprecedented prosperity and well-being and an expanding abundance of
those resources. (Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads Digest)
Holdren
all wrong - At the end of “Science and Government,” his Godkin
Lectures at Harvard nearly a half-century ago that revealed some
disastrous wartime scientific misjudgments of the British government, Sir
Charles P. Snow offered one reason why it is important to have scientists
in government: They have something to give that “our kind of existential
society is desperately short of: That is foresight.”
It is because he so demonstrably lacks foresight that John P. Holdren,
professor of environmental policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School, should
not be confirmed as President Obama’s science adviser.
William Yeatman, an analyst for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, has
done a service by examining Holdren’s record of bad predictions. (Boston
Herald)
Climate:
Change You Can't Believe In - Barack Obama campaigned for the White
House on a promise he'd deliver "change you can believe in." And
the popular totals suggest that 52% of voters believed indeed. But
according to a recent Rasmussen Poll, there's one change that only 41% of
Americans can believe in - manmade climate change. That's down from 47%
just nine months ago, and before moving the country down an unpopular
green-paved road to disaster, the "unity" promising freshman
president would be well advised to understand why. (Marc Sheppard,
American Thinker)
Europe
to Ask Wealthy Nations to Adopt Carbon Trading System - BRUSSELS —
The European Commission was preparing an appeal on Friday to wealthy
countries — and to the United States in particular — to adopt carbon
trading as one of the main mechanisms for curbing greenhouse gas
emissions.
The Europeans are drafting their proposal as the United States enters a
period of intense debate over the wisdom of adopting such market-based
systems following the inauguration of President Obama.
Mr. Obama endorsed a similar system to cap and trade carbon dioxide, the
main greenhouse gas, during his election campaign. That system sets a
limit on emissions, and those who exceed it must buy or trade permits to
meet it.
The main alternative to a cap-and-trade system is a tax on emissions. Many
analysts say that would be a more straightforward way of limiting
planet-warming gases from industry. (New York Times)
Clinton
climate change envoy vows 'dramatic diplomacy' - WASHINGTON, Jan 26 -
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton named a special envoy on Monday to lead
U.S. efforts to fight global warming and forge new international accords
on reducing carbon emissions and developing clean energy.
The appointment -- which accompanied other energy policy steps announced
by President Barack Obama -- signaled a break from the Bush
administration's climate policies, and Clinton's pick promised
"vigorous, dramatic diplomacy."
Todd Stern, a senior White House official under former President Bill
Clinton, will be the administration's principal adviser on international
climate policy and strategy and its chief climate negotiator.
"With the appointment today of a special envoy we are sending an
unequivocal message that the United States will be energetic, focused,
strategic and serious about addressing global climate change and the
corollary issue of clean energy," Clinton said at a State Department
ceremony. (Reuters)
Senate
calls for more Gore - Former Vice President Al Gore returns to Capitol
Hill Wednesday to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Sen. John Kerry, who chairs the committee, had kind words for his fellow
former Democratic presidential nominee: "Al Gore has been sounding
the alarm on climate change for over three decades, and he understands the
urgent need for American engagement and leadership on this issue."
Mr. Gore, who has opted to stay in private life rather than return with
the Democratic administration, still has easy access with President
Obama's team. (Washington Times)
China
dams reveal flaws in climate-change weapon - The hydroelectric dam, a
low wall of concrete slicing across an old farming valley, is supposed to
help a power company in distant Germany contribute to saving the climate -
while putting lucrative "carbon credits" into the pockets of
Chinese developers.
But in the end the new Xiaoxi dam may do nothing to lower global-warming
emissions as advertised. And many of the 7,500 people displaced by the
project still seethe over losing their homes and farmland. (Associated
Press)
Fast Action Needed To Avoid
Climate Chaos: Study - BRUSSELS - Global temperature rises due to
climate change could be kept below the critical 2 degree mark by fast
international action to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70 percent by
2030, a report said on Monday.
Scientists say that if temperatures increase beyond 2 degrees, humanity
faces severe environmental fallout, such as melting polar ice caps and
rising sealevels.
Increasing numbers of scientists and politicians question whether the 2
degrees goal is achievable, given the slow progress of international
negotiations so far. (Reuters)
Bloody idiots! We couldn't warm the planet 2 °C even if we
wanted to.
Don't
use air conditioners, state told - THE South Australian Government is
urging people not to use their air conditioners as the state swelters in
three days of 40C-plus temperatures.
Citing the community's environmental responsibilities, the State
Government today put our a press release saying there were many
alternatives to using air conditioners, urging South Australians to
instead insulate ceilings and use external blinds or a pergola to shade
windows, AdelaideNow reports.
The Transport, Energy and Infrastructure Department's energy division's
press release said residents should close curtains and use portable and
ceiling fans instead of air conditioners. (The Advertiser)
Yeah? How about not voting such idiot politicians back into office?
Solar
industry cash dries up - AUSTRALIA is forfeiting billions of dollars
in investment and thousands of jobs through its lack of support for solar
energy, according to European companies that have shunned the sunburnt
country.
An Age investigation has found that potential investors courted by federal
and state governments have rejected Australia, the world's sunniest
continent, citing a lack of business incentives such as tax breaks and the
nation's unwillingness to regulate in favour of renewable energy. (The
Age)
What, I'm supposed to be disappointed not to be paying vastly more
for energy and more taxes just to provide these twits with profits? Get
a life, you dopey buggers! Australia has coal to burn for literally
millennia, which we will do until something cheaper and more convenient
comes along and that for sure is not intermittent, inadequate,
inefficient and woefully unreliable surface-level sunlight harvesting.
Lomborg repeats many of his common errors but still makes sense: The
climate change safari park - Barack Obama in his inaugural speech
promised to “roll back the spectre of a warming planet.” In this
context, it is worth contemplating a passage from his book Dreams from My
Father. It reveals a lot about the way we view the world’s problems.
Obama is in Kenya and wants to go on a safari. His Kenyan sister Auma
chides him for behaving like a neo-colonialist. “Why should all that
land be set aside for tourists when it could be used for farming? These
wazungu care more about one dead elephant than they do for a hundred black
children.” Although he ends up going on safari, Obama has no answer to
her question. That anecdote has parallels with the current preoccupation
with global warming. Many people — including America’s new President
— believe that global warming is the pre-eminent issue of our time, and
that cutting CO2 emissions is one of the most virtuous things we can do.
To stretch the metaphor a little, this seems like building ever-larger
safari parks instead of creating more farms to feed the hungry.
Make no mistake: global warming is real, and it is caused by manmade CO2
emissions. The problem is that even global, draconian, and hugely costly
CO2 reductions will have virtually no impact on the temperature by
mid-century. Instead of ineffective and costly cuts, we should focus much
more of our good climate intentions on dramatic increases in R&D for
zero-carbon energy, which would fix the climate towards mid-century at low
cost. But, more importantly for most of the planet’s citizens, global
warming simply exacerbates existing problems.
Consider malaria. Models shows global warming will increase the incidence
of malaria by about 3% by the end of the century, because mosquitoes are
more likely to survive when the world gets hotter. But malaria is much
more strongly related to health infrastructure and general wealth than it
is to temperature. Rich people rarely contract malaria or die from it;
poor people do.
Strong carbon cuts could avert about 0.2% of the malaria incidence in a
hundred years. The other option is simply to prioritise eradication of
malaria today. It would be relatively cheap and simple, involving expanded
distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets, more preventive treatment
for pregnant women, increased use of the maligned pesticide DDT, and
support for poor nations that cannot afford the best new therapies.
Tackling nearly 100% of today’s malaria problem would cost just
one-sixtieth of the price of the Kyoto Protocol. Put another way, for each
person saved from malaria by cutting CO2 emissions, direct malaria
policies could have saved 36,000. Of course, carbon cuts are not designed
only to tackle malaria. But, for every problem that global warming will
exacerbate — hurricanes, hunger, flooding — we could achieve
tremendously more through cheaper, direct policies today. (Bjorn Lomborg,
Economic Times)
How anyone can do the math, recognize real problems and still think
gorebull warming is real remains a mystery and yet this is what Lomborg
claims to do. Perhaps he's just playing the ratbags at their own game.
Report:
Cost of rapid CO2 cuts "manageable" - Rapidly reducing
greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade to curb global warming could
cost less than 1 percent of world gross domestic product by 2030, a report
from management consultants McKinsey & Co said Monday. (Associated
Press)
A single dollar spent on doing nothing but harm is unaffordable and
there is nothing but harm to come from attempts to constrain emission of
an essential trace gas.
Apparently not a joke: Meat
to be removed from hospital menus as NHS tells patients to ring GPs to cut
carbon emissions - Patients should phone their GP rather than drive in
for a visit, according to National Health Service guidelines unveiled
today.
Ministers want family doctors to hold more 'phone-in' surgeries to help
the environment by cutting carbon emissions from cars.
They also want hospitals to achieve their green targets by reducing the
amount of meat they serve to patients in wards. (Daily Mail)
NZCPR
Weekly: The Cold Winds of 2008 - This week's NZCPR Weekly examines how
global warming mania has been able to establish such a stronghold in New
Zealand, the NZCPR Guest Commentary by Lord Christopher Monckton questions
pronouncements by the global warming guru Al Gore, and the poll asks
whether NZ's emissions trading scheme should be put on hold - permanently!
(NZ Centre For Political Debate)
Stimulus
Plan: Non-Existent Unemployed Climate Modelers Get $140 Million -
President Barack Obama’s trillion dollar stimulus plan, has morphed into
an appropriations bill devoid of debate. The process forgoes any pretense
of targeting unemployed people and resources.
For instance, the bill reads “Provided further, That not less than
$140,000,000 shall be available for climate data modeling.” This raises
the question of how many unemployed climate modelers are out there
pounding the pavement. (The Foundry)
Oh Susan... New
Study Shows Climate Change Largely Irreversible - A new scientific
study led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reaches a
powerful conclusion about the climate change caused by future increases of
carbon dioxide: to a large extent, there’s no going back.
The pioneering study, led by NOAA senior scientist Susan Solomon, shows
how changes in surface temperature, rainfall, and sea level are largely
irreversible for more than 1,000 years after carbon dioxide (CO2)
emissions are completely stopped. The findings appear during the week of
January 26 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (NOAA)
1,000-year forecasts? Do you suppose she really believes PlayStation®
Climatology has value over even 1,000 days? At present models can't even
agree on the likely state of the El Niño Southern Oscillation 1,000 hours
hence and that's a relatively simple and moderately well-understood
cycle.
Funny, peculiar variety: Global
warming impacting monsoon trend in India: study - Thiruvananthapuram (PTI):
Increasing global warming has had an adverse impact on the monsoon
activity over peninsular India in the last five decades resulting in
decline in number of monsoon depressions and weakening of the monsoon
current, according to a senior meteorologist.
The strength of low level monsoon winds through the region had decreased
by about 20 per cent during the last 50 years, P V Joseph, a former
director of India Meteorological Department (IMD), said.
The finding was that the sea surface temperature of the equatorial central
Indian Ocean has increased by about 1.5 degree Celsius, which was much
higher than anywhere else in the global tropics, he said.
"This phenomenon is feared to have had an adverse impact on the
Indian monsoon by creating an area of increasing rainfall near the equator
which would weaken the monsoon heat engine (the vertical Monsoon Hadley
Cell that drives the monsoon circulation over the subcontinent),"
Joseph said in a paper presented at the 'National Workshop on Global
Warming and its effect on Kerala" here last week.
All-India average air temperature had also increased by 0.6 degree Celsius
in the last century. This was comparable to the global average.
The observed change in climate has been two ways -- decadal change (a few
decades of increase followed by a few decades of decrease) and long term
trends, either decreasing or increasing.
The annual number of monsoon depressions and the monsoon rainfall of south
Kerala had witnessed strong decreasing trends. However, reason for this
had to be studied in depth, the paper said.
The sea surface temperatures over both the Arabian Sea and the Bay of
Bengal had increased during the last 50 years.
Monsoon dates in Kerala and the number of tropical cyclones in a year in
the Indian seas did not have any long term trend but had long period
oscillations in the last 100 years, he said. (The Hindu)
Other researchers blame the Asian Brown Cloud (by way of cooling the
equatorial central Indian Ocean) for a reduction in Indian Summer
Monsoon Rainfall and yet these guys suggest the ECIO SST has increased
by 2-3 times the global average. It can't have done both over the same
period in the same region fellas.
Advocacy
Threatens Scientific Integrity - Physicists, as well as the entire
scientific community, should be concerned about the harm that advocacy is
doing to scientific integrity. Certain aspects of the current discourse on
climate change exemplify this harm. (Robert E. Levine, Forum on Physics
& Society)
"Warming
freezes the Southern Ocean," Another Mann-made Climate Change -
In late January 2009, the once-respected “science” journal Nature
published the results of a computer model apparently showing that nearly
all of the Antarctic continent had not cooled over the past 50 years, as
the real-world observational data showed, but had warmed instead. The
newly-created “warming” was achieved not by direct observation, which
has long produced inconvenient cooling, but by “statistical
climate-field-reconstruction techniques to obtain a 50-year-long,
spatially complete estimate of monthly Antarctic temperature anomalies.”
(Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
Spinning furiously: Professor
takes part in landmark climate change study - Scott Rutherford, an
assistant professor in the department of environmental science at Roger
Williams University, is co-author of a scientific paper that made
international news last week with its findings of warming in Antarctica,
where earlier studies had tracked more cooling.
The paper in the journal Nature was picked up in hundreds of publications
and Web sites as far away as Australia and South Africa.
“It’s kind of neat,” Rutherford said last week of all of the
attention.
Rutherford had studied with one of the key authors, Michael Mann of
Pennsylvania State University, a speaker at last fall’s Honors
Colloquium on Climate Change at the University of Rhode Island. Other
co-authors in the study represent prestigious institutions around the
country such as the University of Washington, the National Center for
Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., NASA’s Goddard Institute for
Space Studies in New York City and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in
Maryland. (Providence Island Journal)
Possible
natural explanation found for West Antarctica's warming - South Pole -
In 2008, scientists from the British Antarctic Survey reported a layer of
volcanic ash and glass shards frozen within an ice sheet in western
Antarctica [the same place the one degree Fahrenheit warming has been
reported]. The volcano beneath the ice sheet "punched a hole right
through" due to its heat and force. This geologic event (a volcano)
may prove to be the source of the recent warming seen in West Antarctica
in what has otherwise been reported as a 50-year cooling trend seen in
East Antarctica. (TGDaily)
Eye-roller: Antarctic
sea creatures hypersensitive to warming - ROTHERA BASE, Antarctica -
Thriving only in near-freezing waters, creatures such as Antarctic sea
spiders, limpets or sea urchins may be among the most vulnerable on the
planet to global warming, as the Southern Ocean heats up.
Isolated for millions of years by the chill currents, exotic animals on
the seabed around Antarctica -- including giant marine woodlice and sea
lemons, a sort of bright yellow slug -- are among the least studied in the
world.
Now scientists on the Antarctic Peninsula are finding worrying signs that
they can only tolerate a very narrow temperature band -- and the waters
have already warmed by about 1 Celsius (1.6 Fahrenheit) in the past 50
years.
"Because this is one of the most rapidly warming areas on the planet
and because the animals are so temperature sensitive...this marine
ecosystem is at higher risk than almost anywhere else on the planet,"
said Simon Morley, a marine biologist at the British Antarctic Survey at
Rothera.
"A temperature rise of only 2-3 degrees (Celsius) above current
temperatures could cause these animals to lose vital functions," he
said. (Reuters)
Alaska
Climate Change - The climate of Alaska has changed considerably over
the past 50-plus years. However, human emissions of greenhouse gases are
not the primary reason.
Instead, the timing of the swings of a periodic, natural cycle-the Pacific
Decadal Oscillation (PDO)-has made a strong imprint on the observed
climate of Alaska since the mid-20th century. Despite its established
existence and influence, this natural cycle is often overlooked or ignored
in zealous attempts to paint the current climate of Alaska as being one
primarily molded by the emissions from anthropogenic industrial
activities. In truth, the climate of Alaska and the ecosystems influenced
by it have been subject to the cycles of the PDO and other natural
variations since the end of the last ice age (some 12,000 years ago) and
likely for eons prior. It is primarily these natural cycles that are
currently shaping Alaska's long-term climate and weather fluctuations. (SPPI)
United
States and Global Data Integrity Issues - Issues with the United
States and especially the global data bases make them inadequate to use
for trend analysis and thus any important policy decisions based on
climate change. These issues include inadequate adjustments for urban
data, bad instrument siting, use of instruments with proven biases that
are not adjusted for, major global station dropout., an increase in
missing monthly data and questionable adjustment practices. (Joe D’Aleo,
SPPI)
Vote
of no confidence for temperature charts - part 2 - ... He [Hansen]
actually says, in the second paragraph, “The hardest part is trying to
influence the nature of the measurements obtained, so that the key
information can be obtained.”
To me this sounds like spin for “The hardest part is making the numbers
show what I want them to”. Let’s see how long it takes for that
sentence in the NASA GISS website to get changed. (Read N Say)
The
other global warming - Even if we contain the greenhouse effect, says
a Tufts astrophysicist, we'll have another heat problem on our hands
Human civilization will heat up the planet; the glaciers will melt and the
seas will rise. It's a familiar refrain by now, with a familiar solution:
stop pumping out the greenhouse gases that trap the sun's heat.
But even if we bring the greenhouse effect under control, says a Tufts
astrophysicist, the earth will warm up anyway, thanks to a completely
different source of heat that we create ourselves.
Over the next 250 years, calculates Eric J. Chaisson in a recent paper,
the earth's population will start generating so much of its own heat -
chiefly wasted from energy use - that it will warm the earth even without
a rise in greenhouse gases. The only way to avoid it, he says, is to
rethink how we generate energy. (Bina Venkataraman, Boston Globe)
And atmospheric motion will defeat that, just as it does 'enhanced
greenhouse'.
More fun with 'puter games: Global
warming could unleash ocean 'dead zones': study - Global warming may
create "dead zones" in the ocean that would be devoid of fish
and seafood and endure for up to two millennia, according to a study
published on Sunday.
Its authors say deep cuts in the world's carbon emissions are needed to
brake a trend capable of wrecking the marine ecosystem and depriving
future generations of the harvest of the seas.
In a study published online by the journal Nature Geoscience, scientists
in Denmark built a computer model to simulate climate change over the next
100,000 years. (AFP)
German
coalition at loggerheads over global warming test - Germany's
coalition government on Monday was at loggerheads over plans to dump iron
sulphate in the South Atlantic to see if it can absorb greenhouse gases
and help stop global warming.
Research Minister Annette Schavan, who is a member of the CDU, gave the
test the green light Monday saying "after a study of expert reports,
I am convinced there are no scientific or legal objections against the...
ocean research experiment LOHAFEX."
However, a spokesman for the environment ministry, whose head Sigmar
Gabriel is a member of the SDP, later said in the statement that the
ministry "regrets the decision" to approve the LOHAFEX test.
An expedition set sail from Cape Town in South Africa on January 7 and is
poised to drop six tonnes of the dissolved iron over 300 square kilometres
(115 square miles) of ocean. (Agence France Presse)
Antarctica
research suspended - Scientists have been ordered to suspend their
controversial Antarctica 'ocean fertilization' experiment. Science
correspondent Julian Rush reports.
Scientists on board a German polar research ship off Antarctica have been
ordered by the German government to suspend their controversial
"ocean fertilisation" experiment - because it may be in breach
of an international treaty.
A British team is part of the joint Indian-German expedition in the
Southern ocean. The researchers want to drop iron into the sea to create a
bloom of plankton some 300 square km in size to see if it might one day be
a way to reduce global warming. (Channel 4 News)
New
Weblog By Bruce Hall On “Decadal Occurrences Of Maximum Statewide
Temperature Records” - A very informative weblog has been posted
today by Bruce Hall on the “Decadal
Occurrences Of Maximum Statewide Temperature Records“. This is a
valuable contribution to the analysis of long term climate extremes.
(Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
A
New Paper From Model Based Parameterizations To Lookup Tables: An EOF
Approach By Leoncini et al paper 2008 - We have a new research paper
that has been published. This paper applies a new methodology that we
reported on in Pielke Sr., R.A., T. Matsui, G. Leoncini, T. Nobis, U.
Nair, E. Lu, J. Eastman, S. Kumar, C. Peters-Lidard, Y. Tian, and R. Walko,
2006: A new paradigm for parameterizations in numerical weather prediction
and other atmospheric models. National Wea. Digest, 30, 93-99. (Roger
Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Still confusing essential trace gas with atmospheric pollution: Satellites
to study atmospheric CO2 - Scientists said they will look at how to
reduce global warming with help from two new satellites.
Researchers at the University of Edinburgh will study data from the
instruments that will measure CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere.
The satellites are being launched by NASA and the Japanese Aerospace
Exploration Agency, and give region-by-region accounts of Earth's carbon
emissions and also highlight areas of the planet which are absorbing the
most CO2.
The vessels, known as The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) and The
Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT), will provide fresh
information on surface emissions and absorption of CO2.
They will take in remote regions such as the Amazon basin, Siberian taiga,
Alaskan tundra and African forests. (Press Association)
Europe wants Obama to give your money to China, India: EU
to pressure US, emerging countries on climate change - BRUSSELS —
Eager to take the lead on climate change, the European Union aims to pile
pressure on the United States and big emerging countries to sign up to an
ambitious strategy to reduce greenhouse gases.
Last month European leaders approved an ambitious climate change action
plan which the 27-nation bloc hopes will become a model for international
negotiations in Copenhagen in December.
"We will do everything to make (Copehagen) a success," European
Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso told reporters on Friday. "The
problem is to know whether the others are ready to do what we have been
doing." (AFP)
Recycling
Climate Change for Profit - Albert Schweitzer said, “As we acquire
more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more
mysterious.” Public knowledge of climate and climate change is growing
slowly every day, but as Schweitzer anticipated it is creating more
mystery.
Most people, including most scientists recently involved in the subject,
are not even at the point climate science was 30 years ago.
The major cause of this lag is the excessive focus on CO2, an
infinitesimal part of a vast and complex system. The Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports are primarily responsible as they
convinced the world of global warming due to CO2, while effectively
ignoring major components such as the sun. I have said the IPCC focus on
CO2 is akin to saying my car is not running well and I am going to
determine the cause by ignoring the engine (sun), the transmission (water
vapor), and most other mechanical parts and focus on one nut (CO2) on the
right rear wheel. Worse, they only look at one thread of the nut, the
human portion of CO2. The ease with which they have achieved this degree
of focus is frightening, but understandable because it was premeditated.
(Tim Ball, CFP)
Obama’s
Order Is Likely to Tighten Auto Standards - WASHINGTON — President
Obama will direct federal regulators on Monday to move swiftly on an
application by California and 13 other states to set strict automobile
emission and fuel efficiency standards, two administration officials said
Sunday.
The directive makes good on an Obama campaign pledge and signifies a sharp
reversal of Bush administration policy. Granting California and the other
states the right to regulate tailpipe emissions would be one of the most
emphatic actions Mr. Obama could take to quickly put his stamp on
environmental policy.
Mr. Obama’s presidential memorandum will order the Environmental
Protection Agency to reconsider the Bush administration’s past rejection
of the California application. While it stops short of flatly ordering the
Bush decision reversed, the agency’s regulators are now widely expected
to do so after completing a formal review process.
Once they act, automobile manufacturers will quickly have to retool to
begin producing and selling cars and trucks that get higher mileage than
the national standard, and on a faster phase-in schedule. The auto
companies have lobbied hard against the regulations and challenged them in
court. (New York Times)
Allowing states to set individual standards for national products
makes about as much sense as allowing states to set railway gauges,
electrical appliance voltage or international treaties. In short, it's a
total nonsense. Someone is not thinking.
Timing
of stricter U.S. standards worries automakers - DETROIT: Automakers
said Monday that they were working toward President Barack Obama's goal of
reducing fuel consumption, but rapid installation of stricter emissions
standards could force them to drastically cut production of larger, more
profitable vehicles in a time of severe financial duress.
Obama ordered the government on Monday to reconsider whether California
and other states could regulate vehicle emissions and help control
greenhouse gas emissions, a reversal of a position taken by the Bush
administration.
The announcement came as General Motors and Chrysler are borrowing
billions of dollars from the government to avoid bankruptcy, and as Toyota
prepares to report its first operating loss in 70 years. Shortly after the
president spoke, GM said it would cut 2,000 jobs at plants in Michigan and
Ohio because of slow sales. (Nick Bunkley, IHT)
Facing the Oil
Problem - A call for an energy policy that would spark outside-the-box
basic research, end dependence on foreign oil, and reduce death and
destruction on the nation's highways. (Charles F. Doran, Johns Hopkins
Magazine)
A
nice old dust up? - On Thursday, German economy minister Michael Glos
was expressing "serious misgivings" about the EU's emissions
trading scheme, complaining that it could cost jobs if it went ahead in
its current form. His own scientific advisory board is urging the repeal
of strict limits for CO2 emissions, and an easing of the system in order
to stabilise the price of permits.
This may or may not be connected with an announcement yesterday that the
German energy giant RWE has decided to build no more new power plants in
western Europe, as the EU's emissions trading scheme has rendered new
projects "unprofitable". (EU Referendum)
Please
keep your babies safe — new vaccine information for parents - If
only it was possible to help every new parent understand and trust doctors
on this one.
For those of us healthcare professionals who were practicing as recently
as the 1970s and early 1980s, the latest news from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) went right through our hearts. The CDC just
reported that a 7-month old infant died, and another four became seriously
ill from Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) last year in Minnesota (which
tracks illnesses more closely than many states). (Junkfood Science)
Obesity
'can be caught - just like a cold' - OBESITY can be "caught"
from another individual in the same way as a cold with the virus spread by
dirty hands, scientists suggest.
The condition has been linked to a highly-infectious virus that causes
sniffles and sore throats. (Courier-Mail)
Apparently infects dogs, too: Fat
dogs seized by RSPCA - The RSPCA has seized two dogs from their owner
after she was accused of feeding them too much. (Daily Telegraph)
And the RSPCA is severely infected by the fat police. I don't give
them money to harass people for pampering pooches, no matter how
misguided said pamperers might be -- they've had their last donation
from me.
Zealots
rampant - No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of
society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't
test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance,
greed, and love of power. -- P. J. O'Rourke (1992) (Number Watch)
'Walking
and talking' may put kids at risk - NEW YORK - Children who walk while
talking on their cell phone may be too distracted to cross the street
safely, a new study suggests.
In tests that had 10- and 11-year-olds walk in a simulated
"virtual" neighborhood, researchers found that when the children
talked on a cell phone as they traveled, they paid less attention to
traffic and were more likely to step into the path of a virtual car.
The effects were seen regardless of how much experience a child had in
using a cell phone or in being pedestrian, according to Despina Stavrinos
and colleagues at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
"Cell phones are not necessarily bad for children to carry and
use," the researchers write in the journal Pediatrics.
"However," they add, "our results suggest that just as
drivers should limit cell phone use while driving, pedestrians -- and
especially child pedestrians -- should limit cell phone use while crossing
streets." (Reuters Health)
Greens'
War Against All Chemicals Will Do Little To Reduce Our Risks - A
report from a panel appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says that
California should expand pollution prevention initiatives, add "green
chemistry" to public school curricula and offer public access to
comprehensive information about the chemicals in consumer products.
The report, part of a plan by the California Environmental Protection
Agency to eliminate many supposedly toxic materials, is more appropriate
for a wish list sent to Santa Claus than an attempt at serious public
policy.
It recalls H.L. Mencken's observation that for every complex problem there
is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong.
For starters, the governor and members of his panel seem oblivious to the
fact that we live in a sea of chemicals — and that, in fact, our bodies
are actually comprised of them — and also to the toxicologists' credo,
"the dose makes the poison."
Many of the alarms raised recently about chemicals, from those in rubber
duckies and plastic bottles to pesticides used in agriculture, are
completely bogus, while most of the others represent only negligible
risks.
Pseudo-scares and the wrongheaded (and often very costly) responses to
them — as in these latest recommendations from the governor's panel —
are wasteful, if not actually harmful. (Henry I Miller, IBD)
January 26, 2009
BBC Newsnight -
Warming up President Obama’s inaugural speech? - What should the BBC
do if the new US President’s references to global warming in his
inaugural speech don’t quite come up to expectations? (Harmless Sky)
Cut
and Paste Journalism - BBC bosses today tried to make excuses for the
cut-and-paste job by BBC science journalist, Susan Watts, as discovered by
Tony at Harmless Sky recently. Answering criticism on Watts’ blog,
Newsnight Editor Peter Rippon said:
We did edit sections of the speech to reflect the elements in it that
referred to Science. The aim was to give people an impression or montage
of what Obama said about science in his inauguration speech. This was
signposted to audiences with fades between each point. It in no way
altered the meaning or misrepresented what the President was saying. You
can look for yourself above.
If this is true, it means that the editorial team at BBC Newsnight are
shockingly naive. If that is true, then we would like to know, what are
they doing producing the networks flagship current affairs magazine
programme?
Even if we give them the benefit of the doubt with respect to their
editorial oversight, by which we mean that we accept that they are naive,
the feature drips with the kind of ideological prejudice that any
run-of-the-mill eco-warrior can muster. This is not news, nor is it
analysis. It is projection. (Climate Resistance)
Global
Cooling Under-reported, Says SPPI - WASHINGTON -- The Earth has shown
an under-reported cooling trend for eight straight years, raising serious
questions about the accuracy of the UN’s climate projections, since not
one of the computer models on which it relies had predicted so long and
steep a cooling, says a new review paper -- Temperature Change and CO2
Change – A Scientific Briefing --from the Science and Public Policy
Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank. (BUSINESS WIRE)
If
Michael Mann had been a corporate accountant . . . - ... he would have
been in jail by now. (Australian Climate Madness)
Oh my... O'Malley
Tries Again On Global Warming - Gov. Martin O'Malley will sponsor
legislation to commit Maryland to a 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions by 2020.
...
"It's really a kumbaya moment." (WBAL Radio) [em added]
| O'Malley
to push bill to reduce state's production of climate-warming pollution
(Baltimore Sun)
Refusing
to Feel Europe's Pain - A policy colleague from Washington state just
left me a message to let me know a state official there just publicly
insisted that Europe had actually suffered no costs from its failed
experiment with cap-and-trade. Let's leave it to the natives to have some
fun with it, but while keeping an eye peeled for the fallout, because
that's a . . . what's the word I'm look- . . . oh, right, a lie. (Chris
Horner, Planet Gore)
Shocked,
Shocked at the New York Times - Well this one caused a quick
double-take this morning. NYT writer and Dot Earth blogger Andy Revkin
complains in the paper today, just like Sens. Olympia Snowe (R., ME) and
Jay Rockefeller (D., WV) before him, that people speaking out are getting
in the way of efforts to impose a particular agenda on you:
Mr. Obama's political foes have already seized on the cooling of public
concern. Marc Morano, the communications director for the Republican
minority on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has been
sending out e-mail alerts, sometimes several a day, highlighting stories
on winter weather and other surveys suggesting a shift in public
attitudes.
Yeah. How dare he. English-to-English translation: hey, we’re working
that corner! Such distaste is awfully rich for anyone from Team Alarmist
given how that’s “what they do.” (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Indoctrination online: Worldwatch
Climate Symposium online - On January 15, leading thinkers,
scientists, and policymakers convened in Washington, D.C. to discuss the
significance of 2009 for the Earth's climate. Authors of State of the
World 2009: Into a Warming World engaged an audience of more than 150
people on the state of the science, the gaps between science and policy,
and practical solutions to help avert the worst effects of climate change
-- all in advance of critical climate negotiations in Copenhagen in
December 2009. (Environmental Law Prof Blog)
Stephen
Schneider’s sea level alarm without scientific merit, reports SPPI -
WASHINGTON -- Claims by Stephen Schneider, a biologist, that melting
Greenland ice will drown today’s coastlines and trigger a worldwide
belief in the need for action to combat imagined “catastrophic global
warming” are scientifically-unjustified and unjustifiable, says the
Science and Public Policy Institute – a Washington, D.C. research
organization. (BUSINESS WIRE)
Are climate
change investors living in a fool’s paradise?
fool’s par·a·dise: “a state of happiness that is temporary and
insubstantial because it is based on illusions or unrealistic hopes” -
Encarta® World English Dictionary [North American Edition] © 2007
Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Developed for Microsoft by
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
I am struck by the diversity of risk analyses being carried out by
investors in today’s climate change market place. Whether it’s
‘carbon’* market conferences and publications, ‘ethical
investments’, insurance company projects or the activities of financial,
legal and engineering institutions, it seems at first glance that they
have it all covered. Many financial, political, procedural, legal and
technical issues are addressed. Anything that might pose a risk to the
market and the hundreds of billions of dollars being poured into one of
the greatest enterprises in human history – ‘fighting’ global
climate change – appears to be examined.
It looks on the surface like an investment and legislative dream come
true, combining the public’s desire to ‘save the planet’ and
compensate for recent stock market losses with helping corporations
fulfill their ‘corporate social responsibilities’. It even satisfies
the natural desire of politicians to be seen to be leading their nations
to safety and a supposedly green, prosperous future.
On closer examination however, one notices something remarkable.
Practically without exception, all of these organizations, many of them
among the most successful and respected in the world, completely ignore
the risk that the very foundation of all of these activities might be
shown to be faulty. Like many of those who were caught off guard by the
subprime mortgage crisis, those involved in the rapidly expanding climate
change industry are not asking the most fundamental of questions:
• What if the science that supposedly backs concerns over carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions cannot be justified?
And, even more important to the investment, legal and political community:
• What if the public at large come to believe that the whole thing is a
gigantic scam? What if it becomes common knowledge that we can’t stop
climate change and all of the great and glorious plans to restrict CO2 and
other greenhouse gas emissions are seen as a complete waste? (Tom Harris,
CFP)
Climate Modelers Gone
Wild - Roger Pielke Jr, however, is a scientist. And over at his blog,
Prometheus, he is making some global climate modelers look silly. In
yesterday’s post, Pielke commented on a new study in the journal Nature,
which suggests that Antarctica is in fact warming, whereas before the icy
continent was thought to be cooling. (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads
Digest)
About that: Using Red again - The
Antarctic visibly warms up - John Brignell has several times,
including recently, pointed out the use of red in charts and maps for
heightened propaganda, here is another excellent example from the
Antarctic:
Richard
Black back on the case
The continent of Antarctica is warming up in step with the rest of the
world, according to a new analysis. Scientists say data from satellites
and weather stations indicate a warming of about 0.6C over the last 50
years.
Writing in the journal Nature, they say the trend is "difficult to
explain" without the effect of rising greenhouse gas levels in the
atmosphere.
In the new analysis, a team of US scientists combined data from land
stations with satellite readings "We have at least 25 years of data
from satellites, and satellites have the huge advantage that they can see
the whole continent," said Eric Steig from the University of
Washington in Seattle. "But the [land] stations have the advantage
that they go back much further in time.
"So we combined the two; and what we found, in a nutshell, is that
there is warming across the whole continent, it's stronger in winter and
spring but it is there in all seasons."
Voila! Case proven!
Or is it?
Here is what Ellen and Lonnie Thompson said about Antarctic Temperature
records in 2003:
ICE CORE PALEOCLIMATE HISTORIES FROM THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA: WHERE DO WE
GO FROM HERE?
Ellen Mosley-Thompson, Lonnie G. Thompson, Byrd Polar Research Center,
Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio.
It is essential to determine whether the strong 20th century warming in
the Antarctic Peninsula (AP) reflects, in part, a response to
anthropogenically driven, globally averaged warming or if it is consistent
with past climate variability in the region. The necessary time
perspective may be reconstructed from chemical and physical properties
preserved in the regional ice cover and ocean sediments. Only three
multi-century climate histories derived from ice cores in the AP region
have been annually dated with good precision (± 2 years per century). The
longest record contains only 1200 years and the three histories do not
provide a coherent picture of 20th century climate variability.
Temperature records for Antarctica are sparse and short with few
extending prior to the International Geophysical Year (1957-58).
This is particularly true for the continental interior. The longest and
most dense network of meteorological records is in the Antarctic
Peninsula region where the temperature record at Orcadas (South Orkney
Islands) extends to 1903.
King et al. [this volume] review the surface temperature records in the
Peninsula that extend to the late 1940s and the upper air measurements
that began in 1956. Their analyses demonstrate marked differences
between the temperature trends in the AP and the rest of the continent
(East and West Antarctica).
Jones et al. [1993] also noted that temperature variations in
the AP region are poorly correlated with those on the main part of the
continent and concluded that extending the Antarctic temperature
record by using the longer temperature histories from the Peninsula would
be inappropriate.
"The Plateau Remote (PR) record contains some longer-term (~century
scale) oscillations with a brief (~3 decades), but strong cooling in the
early 17th century.
Conditions remain at or above the long-term mean from 1660 to 1780
after which a gradual cooling trend persists until 1870 after which
conditions warm rapidly, peaking at the turn of the 20th century. Since
that time the δ18O record indicates a cooling trend to the
present.
The PR δ18O record, like those from South Pole, does
not show 20th century 18O enrichment (warming),
[Mosley-Thompson, unpublished data]. Similarly, the recently published
isotopic record from Berkner Island [Mulvaney et al., 2002] also does
not show a 20th century warming.
Domack et al. [this volume] report their cores contain a Medieval Warm
Period (1.15 ka to 0.7 ka), a Little Ice Age signal (0.7 ka to
~0.15 ka) and 200-year oscillations in the regional climate/oceanographic
conditions."
(Isn't it strange then that we are told the LIA and MWP were confined
to the N. Hemisphere and even disposed of altogether by Mann et al)
The pdf can be downloaded from this
link.
I don't think anyone could say the Thompsons are "deniers"....
Regards
Dennis Ambler.
This could get entertaining... The
Orbiting Carbon Observatory and the Mystery of the Missing Sinks -
Picture a tree in the forest. The tree "inhales" carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere, transforming that greenhouse gas into the building
materials and energy it needs to grow its branches and leaves.
By removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, the tree serves as an
indispensable "sink," or warehouse, for carbon that, in tandem
with Earth's other trees, plants and the ocean, helps reduce rising levels
of carbon dioxide in the air that contribute to global warming.
Each year, humans release more than 30-billion tons of carbon dioxide into
the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels for powering vehicles,
generating electricity and manufacturing products. Up to five-and-a-half
additional tons of carbon dioxide are released each year by biomass
burning, forest fires and land-use practices such as slash-and-burn
agriculture. Between 40 and 50 percent of that amount remains in the
atmosphere, according to measurements by about 100 ground-based carbon
dioxide monitoring stations scattered across the globe. Another estimated
30 percent is dissolved into the ocean, the world's largest sink.
But what about the rest? The math doesn't add up. For years, scientists
have sought to find the answer to this mystery. Though scientists agree
the remaining carbon dioxide is also "inhaled" by Earth, they
have been unable to precisely determine where it is going, what processes
are involved, and whether Earth will continue to absorb it in the future.
A new NASA satellite scheduled to launch in February 2009 is poised to
shed a very bright light on these "missing" sinks: the Orbiting
Carbon Observatory. (NASA News)
... as previous estimates are exposed as the wild guesses they are.
Slow news day? NASA
study links severe storm increases, global warming - The frequency of
extremely high clouds in Earth's tropics - the type associated with severe
storms and rainfall - is increasing as a result of global warming,
according to a study by scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
La Canada Flintridge. (Pasadena Star-News)
They are talking about this month-old dubious
release. Now, we have no doubt there are both seasonal and cyclical
changes in deep convective cloud formation but 5 years of data isn't
much to hang your hat on, much less claim gorebull warming associations.
AB32
cripples state’s ability to compete in global economy - As a new
member of the California State Assembly, I have introduced my first bill
to suspend AB32 — the so-called California Global Warming Solutions Act
of 2006.
In 2006, on a party-line vote, legislative Democrats passed AB32 over the
objections of Republicans. Authored by then-Assembly Speaker Fabien Núñez,
ostensibly to combat the effects of global warming, AB32 forces businesses
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020.
Appealing to the politically correct crowd of 2006, AB32 was hailed far
and wide by left-leaning political elites. They could not have envisioned
our economic downturn or the devastating effects of AB32 on California’s
economy and it’s environment — or could they?
There have been economic slumps in past decades and subsequent recoveries.
But there are major differences between then and now. (The Union)
Jym Ganahl and Bob
Wagner post presentation interview - Ridin the Wave with Dave has a
post presentation interview of the recent Global Warming Presentation. It
is nice to see people in the media are finally starting to take on this
issue, and address the real science. If you are a member of a civic
organization, Jym has a great presentation debunking GW, and of course I
am always willing to give my presentation as well. For those of you who
don't know who Jym Ganahl is, he is the Channel 4 Meteorologist. (The
Internet Skeptic)
Global
warming skeptics on video discussing how they have been vilified -
Below is a report from 20/20 about credible scientists who debate Global
Warming. John Stossel discusses the professional and personal attack on
these educated men who dared to stick with their research and beliefs.
There is a lot of debate in the scientific community, but many scientists
have been silenced out of fear. (Baltimore Weather Examiner)
Industry
heat on Rudd ETS stance - The introduction of emissions trading ahead
of our major trading competitors will make life more difficult for our
mining industry and its workers.
LAST Wednesday will be remembered as the day the world-wide economic
meltdown hit our shores.
Yes, there have been the obvious signs of stock exchanges plunging, banks
being rescued and superannuation dwindling before our eyes but this time
it was something more tangible - jobs.
Thousands of jobs were slashed from the workforce. Employees, without
warning, were called in and told to pack up and leave. The layoffs were
across the board _ manufacturing, retail sales, media, banking and,
perhaps most significantly, mining.
Geelong suffered with CSR Viridian closing down and shedding 80 jobs and
work on our tallest building, WaterMarque, being put on hold indefinitely.
The mining boom is, for now, over. The Chinese juggernaut which has driven
the fortunes of our mining industry for the past few years has slowed with
the inevitable results - mines closed and miners sacked. (Geelong
Advertiser)
Glacier
Slowdown in Greenland: How Inconvenient - In this week’s Science
magazine, science writer Richard Kerr reports on some of the goings-on at
this past December’s annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
While he didn’t cover our presentation at the meeting in which we
described our efforts at creating a reconstruction of ice melt across
Greenland dating back into the late 1700s (we found that the greatest
period of ice melt occurred in the decades around the 1930s), Kerr did
cover some other recent findings concerning the workings of Greenland’s
cryosphere in his article titled “Galloping Glaciers of Greenland Have
Reined Themselves In.” (WCR)
Reply
By Pielke Et Al To The Comment By Parker Et Al. On Our 2007 JGR paper
“Unresolved Issues With The Assessment Of Multi-Decadal Global Land
Surface Temperature Trends” - In 2007, we published the paper Pielke
Sr., R.A., C. Davey, D. Niyogi, S. Fall, J. Steinweg-Woods, K. Hubbard, X.
Lin, M. Cai, Y.-K. Lim, H. Li, J. Nielsen-Gammon, K. Gallo, R. Hale, R.
Mahmood, S. Foster, R.T. McNider, and P. Blanken, 2007: Unresolved issues
with the assessment of multi-decadal global land surface temperature
trends. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S08, doi:10.1029/2006JD008229.
The is a Comment by Parker et al in press in JGR-Atmospheres on our 2007
paper. It is Parker, D. E., P. Jones, T. C. Peterson, and J. Kennedy
(2009), Comment on ‘Unresolved Issues with the Assessment of
Multi-Decadal Global Land Surface Temperature Trends’ by Roger A. Pielke,
Sr. et al., J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2008JD010450, in press. (Roger
Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
The
Origin of Increasing Atmospheric CO2 - a Response from Ferdinand Engelbeen
- After yesterday’s post about manmade vs. natural sources of CO2, I
received the following e-mail from Ferdinand Engelbeen. I’ve reproduced
that e-mail below, and made a couple of comments (also in
italics)….I’m at a conference, so I posted this quickly…sorry for
any typos… and thanks to Ferdinand for taking the time to respond. - Roy
(Roy W. Spencer)
Correlation
demonstrated between cosmic rays and temperature of the stratosphere -
This offers renewed hope for Svensmark’s theory of cosmic ray modulation
of earth’s cloud cover. Here is an interesting correlation published
just yesterday in GRL. (Watts Up With That?)
"Renewed hope"? I must admit that seems a very strange way
of putting it. The Svensmark Effect exists or it does not. It is
significant or it is not. Either way it will be confirmed or not in time
but it has little (nothing) to do with "hope".
Despite
the hot air, the Antarctic is not warming up - A deeply flawed new
report will be cited ad nauseam by everyone from the BBC to Al Gore, says
The measures being proposed to meet what President Obama last week called
the need to "roll back the spectre of a warming planet" threaten
to land us with the most colossal bill mankind has ever faced. It might
therefore seem peculiarly important that we can trust the science on which
all the alarm over global warming is based, But nothing has been more
disconcerting in this respect than the methods used by promoters of the
warming cause over the years to plug some of the glaring holes in their
scientific argument.
Another example last week was the much-publicised claim, contradicting all
previous evidence, that Antarctica, the world's coldest continent, is in
fact warming up, Antarctica has long been a major embarrassment to the
warmists. Al Gore and co may have wanted to scare us that the continent
which contains 90 per cent of all the ice on the planet is heating up,
because that would be the source of all the meltwater which they claim
will raise sea levels by 20 feet.
However, to provide all their pictures of ice-shelves "the size of
Texas" calving off into the sea, they have had to draw on one tiny
region of the continent, the Antarctic Peninsula – the only part that
has been warming. The vast mass of Antarctica, all satellite evidence has
shown, has been getting colder over the past 30 years. Last year's sea-ice
cover was 30 per cent above average. (Christopher Booker, Daily Telegraph)
More
on Antarctica and “Consistent With” - (Roger Pielke, Jr.,
Prometheus)
Funny to see them reaching for facts: Steve
Connor: Sceptics, scientists and global warming - The cable news
network CNN has sacked its science team, and one of the consequences has
been a number of embarrassing programmes about how the exceptionally cold
weather in North America this winter contradicts global warming and
supports the idea that we are actually due for or a period of global
cooling, if not a full-blown ice age. (The Independent)
As it happens they are right (for once), there is no proof of
long-term cooling to be had from recent weather events (nor of gorebull
warming from any weather events either). Sadly this new-found desire for
facts will likely last only until summer.
Turnbull's
climate gamble - THE battle over climate change policy is set to
escalate dramatically, with the Opposition Leader to outline an
alternative method of reducing greenhouse gases the Coalition claims will
not threaten jobs or business.
The move comes as the Government forges ahead today with its emissions
trading scheme in spite of the global financial crisis.
The Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, will announce a three-pronged
policy of greenhouse gas reduction that will impose no direct costs on
businesses or homes and require no behavioural change, and aims to
eradicate divisions in the Coalition over climate change. It will also
enable the Coalition to oppose Labor's scheme as economically damaging
during the financial downturn. (Sydney Morning Herald)
Federal
battle over economy, environment - BOTH sides of politics were
yesterday grappling for control of the economic and environmental high
ground amid pessimism about the outlook for employment and financial
markets.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull abandoned any earlier pretence that the
economic crisis would be tackled in a bipartisan way, declaring the Rudd
Government's $4 billion partnership with the big four banks to fund
commercial property projects would merely pad the banks' balance sheets
without saving a single job. (Canberra Times)
Rudd's
economic disaster - DESPITE the international fiscal crisis, Prime
Minister Kevin Rudd is still hell-bent on pursuing anti-business policies
that he and senior ministers well know will cost even more Australians
their jobs. (Piers Akerman, Daily Telegraph)
After
the Age of Oil - On top of the other problems plaguing the world, such
as global warming and the current financial meltdown, there's a third
pressing issue that threatens to bring the good life to an end: The world
is fast running out of oil.
Given that crude oil makes up 36.4 per cent of the world's energy
consumption, the seriousness of shortages cannot be underplayed. Our
reliance on oil is almost total. It fuels 100 per cent of air and sea
transport and most of our land transport. Without oil there is no
petrochemical industry. Agriculture, manufacturing, building materials,
the clothes we wear, the food we eat and the medicines we take depend on
oil.
Running out of oil is a question of when -- not if. (Montreal Gazette)
To some extent they are right -- about 'conventional' oil.
Fortunately this is largely irrelevant as we have centuries worth of
readily accessible carbon supplies in coal alone and it is not too
difficult to create liquid fuels from these. Then there's shale, methane
hydrates... the age of carbon has really only just begun, which is why
misanthropic greenies are so desperate to paint carbon as pollution
rather than the globe's life support system.
Not
Driving Drives Oil Prices Downward - If you are looking for a reason
why oil demand and oil prices are so lackluster, consider this: US drivers
are staying home, and they are doing so in record numbers.
According to the latest data from the Federal Highway Administration, the
number of miles traveled in November 2008 fell by 5.3 percent compared to
the year-earlier month. As noted by blogger Mark J. Perry this is the
thirteenth consecutive month that traffic volume has declined. And Perry
notes, this change “represents one of the most significant adjustments
to driving behavior in American history.” Furthermore, the decline in
traffic volume over the 12-month period ending November 2008, is the
biggest annual decline recorded since the federal government began
collecting data in 1971. (Robert Bryce)
How about the decline in Chinese demand? China is undergoing a rapid
slowdown which is reflected in the inflow of resources. Even the
previously bullet-proof Australian mining sector is laying off workers
and closing mines due to reduced Chinese demand so why should oil demand
be any different? Sorry, not convinced American drivers control global
oil demand.
Idiots: Environmentalists
Hail Pushback Of South Dakota Power Plant - The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) filed objections to an air quality permit a South
Dakota state agency had granted for a large coal-fired power plant, a move
environmentalists hailed as the beginning of a new era on coal powered
plants.
“This is a signal that the Obama administration is taking a much harder
look at coal power from the previous administration,” Darrell Gerber, a
program coordinator for the group Clean Water Action, told the New York
Times.
"EPA is signaling that it is back to enforcing long-standing legal
requirements fairly and consistently nationwide," said Bruce Nilles,
head of the Sierra Club's initiative to block coal power plants, told
Reuters.
Navajo Nation Steps Up
to Supply America's Energy Needs - Greenwire has a long lead story
(subscription required) in today's edition by Daniel Cusick about the
plans of the Navajo Nation to build three huge new coal-fired power plants
totaling 5,300 megawatts in order to exploit their enormous coal
resources. These new plants could supply enough electricity for
approximately four million homes in the rapidly growing cities of the
Southwest. (Myron Ebell, CEI)
A
Better Shade of Green - DURING Senate hearings on his nomination as
secretary of energy, Steven Chu, the Nobel laureate physicist, reiterated
his and President Obama’s support for a cap-and-trade program as a
cost-effective method to address climate change. Under such a program, a
limit is set on emissions, and polluters can emit carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases only by obtaining permits.
That’s good policy. However, Dr. Chu may find the path to cap and trade
made more difficult by the well-intentioned advocates of a national
“renewable portfolio standard,” which would require energy companies
to produce specific amounts of electricity largely from wind, solar and
geothermal energy.
A renewable portfolio standard is said to be needed for creating and
improving renewable energy technologies. In practice, however, it does
little to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and makes energy production
excessively expensive.
Coal-fired power plants produce more than 83 percent of the electricity
sector’s carbon dioxide emissions. But because coal is cheaper than
natural gas or oil, it is the least likely to be displaced by solar or
wind power.
Natural gas has a relatively low carbon content. But it is likely to be
the first to be displaced by renewable sources of energy because it is
more expensive than coal. That means that even a renewable portfolio
standard as high as 20 percent would reduce emissions by only a small
fraction of what is needed to lower the risk of catastrophic climate
change. (New York Times)
Eliminate
DOE for Deficit Reduction - Thirty one years ago the Department of
Energy (DOE) was established during the Carter Administration. They
currently have 16,000 federal employees, and approximately 100,000
contract employees. Their proposed budget is up 4.7% from 2008. No one
seems to know why the DOE was founded. The reason given 31 years ago was
“to lessen our dependence on foreign oil”. Instituted on 8/4/77, the
DOE is asking for 25.2 billion in discretionary funding in the US annual
budget for 2009.
Certainly our dependence on foreign oil wasn’t 65 % thirty-one years
ago. And thirty-one years from now, unless we’re allowed to drill in the
US, our dependence will be much higher than 65 %. Currently, OPEC owns
well over 70 % of existing oil producers. There is no agency controlling
what OPEC can charge for a barrel of oil. There is no entity that can stop
OPEC from gouging at will if it deems it is the most profitable route.
Drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) of the US, as well as the
Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) will significantly reduce our
dependence on foreign oil. The DOE is unnecessary for elimination of that
dependence. Right now, OPEC controls how much a barrel of oil will cost,
and how much we will pay at the pump.
Elimination of 25.2 billion/yr will push America towards a balanced
budget. In fact, if one looks at the current Executive Departments (15),
many can be axed from the list, especially the DOE. Necessary departments
such as Defense, Treasury, Security, Justice, Veterans Affairs, and Health
and Human Services should stay. Most others add huge amounts of government
jobs which produce nothing, and could at least have their expenditures
whittled down. (Kevin Roeten, Opinion Editorials)
Emissions
Fight Squeezes Obama - WASHINGTON -- The state of California and the
automobile industry are pressing the Obama administration to decide
whether states may impose their own limits on autos' greenhouse-gas
emissions, an issue that pits President Barack Obama's allies in the labor
and environmental movements against one another. (Wall Street Journal)
NADA
complains of double-regulation of fuel economy - The patchwork would
exist in thirteen states, Washington, D.C., and Bernalillo County , NM ,
which account for over 40% of the nation's new car market. Pennsylvania
would not be part of the patchwork because it bases compliance on
complying in California .
An automaker could comply in California and offer the exact same choice of
vehicles in another CARB state, and yet still not be in compliance, solely
due to differing consumer demand for different types of vehicles.
If the patchwork were to take effect in all 50 states, it would result in
a 50-state patchwork, as an automaker would still have to manage 50 unique
state fleets to individually meet CARB's standard 50 times.
The patchwork would create the "cross border sales loophole," as
CARB's regulation does not regulate cars imported from non-CARB states
that are registered in CARB states.
The patchwork reopens the SUV loophole; and
Several automakers and potentially new entrants from China and India would
be exempt from CARB's regulation until 2016, provided they limit their
sales in California. (National Automobile Dealers Association)
Brown
welcomes announcement of new nuclear sites - Prime minister claims:
"Nuclear is crucial to our low carbon future"
The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) today announced that it is
willing to provide land for new nuclear plants at Sellafield, Wylfa,
Oldbury and Bradwell, removing another of the potential barriers to
government plans for a new fleet of nuclear reactors.
Speaking on a visit to the Sellafield plant in west Cumbria, prime
minister Gordon Brown welcomed the NDA's decision arguing that a new
generation of nuclear plants would provide a multi-billion pound boost to
the UK economy while also helping to cut carbon emissions.
"Nuclear is crucial to our low carbon future; it is crucial to our
energy security and at the same time it represents a massive opportunity
for the UK economy and jobs," he said. "Industry are investing
billions into the UK economy, jobs are being created and supply chain
opportunities are developing." (James Murray, BusinessGreen)
Cape
Wind and Its Discontents - The lead editorial in the Wall Street
Journal today, entitled “Blowhards” and excerpted below, is a
heartwarming tale of green hypocrisy and aggrieved NIMBYism. It details
the efforts of some of our favorite environmentally holier-than-thou
Democrats to prevent a wind farm in Nantucket Sound. (Edward John Craig,
Planet Gore)
OMGBUGZINMAIFOODZ!
YUCK! - Bug Girl called it. When the Scientific American piled on with
alarm about cochineal, she called them on it. As a professor of
entomology, she knows her bugs. She’s probably heard every scare there
is about perfectly harmless little bugs. People are squeamish and easily
grossed out by creepy things they don’t understand and the thought of
eating bugs… “OMGBUGZ!” (Junkfood Science)
Lunch
box police - Well, it’s happened. School principals in Australia
want teachers to have the power to police lunch boxes from home to remove
any offending cookies or chips that are deemed by the State Government as
unhealthy. Victorian Principals Association chief Fred Ackerman has backed
the move, according to the Herald Sun, saying teachers need the authority
to enforce ‘healthy eating’ habits. (Junkfood Science)
National
Patient Registry - The push to create a nationalized electronic
medical records system has been stepped up with a massive influx of
another $20 billion in government funding and new mandates. Independent
studies estimate the real costs to taxpayers will run at least $75 billion
to $100 billion over the next ten years, as CNN Money just reported. The
goal is to put the health records of all citizens into a government
computer network within the next five years. The medical records from
every doctor office, clinic, hospital, laboratory, pharmacy and diagnostic
facility in the country would be interconnected “to ensure the
uninhibited flow of health data” among all stakeholders and federal
agencies, according to the Department of Health and Human Services
Department. (Junkfood Science)
Um, no: Recommended
cholesterol level may be too high - NEW YORK - Many patients who
suffer a heart attack have levels of "bad" LDL cholesterol well
below recommended limits, supporting efforts to revise current guidelines
to include lower target levels, new research shows. (Reuters Health)
What it really means is that attempting to use cholesterol levels as
an indicator is and always has been a nonsense.
Pilots'
radiation exposure may damage genes - NEW YORK - Airline pilots'
exposure to radiation because of the long periods they spend at high
altitudes may raise their odds of developing genetic abnormalities that
could contribute to cancer, a new study suggests.
A number of studies have looked at whether airline crews are at increased
risk of various cancers because of frequent exposure to cosmic radiation
-- radiation that is mostly blocked by the earth's atmosphere but exists
at higher levels at high altitudes. Those studies have come to conflicting
results, however.
This latest study, published in the journal Occupational and Environmental
Medicine, looked at whether airline pilots tend to have a higher rate of
genetic abnormalities known as chromosome translocations. These genetic
alterations naturally become more common as people age, but they also
arise from exposure to radiation, which can lead to cancerous changes in
body cells.
Researchers led by Dr. Lee C. Yong, of the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, analyzed blood samples from 89 airline
pilots and a comparison group of 50 university professors of the same age.
They found that, overall, chromosome translocations were not more common
among the pilots. (Reuters Health)
So either professors fly as much as commercial pilots or there is
nothing to this, is there. That didn't stop them trying to make
something of a flying-radiation damage correlation though.
Finally, a silver lining: Bond
money crunch freezes out environmental nonprofits - California's ocean
of red ink is threatening its pursuit of a green future.
When the state froze bond money spending last month, most of the public
attention focused on roads, levees and other public works projects that
were put on hold. But the freeze also devastated conservation groups in
the region that were counting on bond money to build trails, plant trees,
clean waterways and close land deals.
Not only is the loss of this money shutting down projects, it's forcing
many environmental nonprofit groups to lay off staff or close. Those that
spent their own money and were awaiting state reimbursement have been
particularly hard-hit. (Sacramento Bee)
Federal
agents investigate fertilizer producers for Calif. organic farms -
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Federal agents this week searched a major producer
of fertilizer for California's organic farmers, widening concern about the
use of synthetic chemicals in the industry.
The raid Thursday targeted Port Organic Products Ltd. of Bakersfield,
Calif. Industry sources estimate the company produced up to half of the
liquid fertilizer used on the state's organic farms in recent years.
The Bee reported in December on a state investigation that caught another
large organic fertilizer maker spiking its product with synthetic
nitrogen, which is cheap, difficult to detect - and banned from organic
farms.
Since then, the organic industry and state officials have taken several
steps to catch violators in California, which produces nearly 60 percent
of the U.S. harvest of organic fruits, nuts and vegetables.
California Certified Organic Farmers, the state's top organic certifier,
last week mandated inspections of fertilizer makers that sell to its
clients. Meanwhile, Earthbound Farm, the nation's largest producer of
organic greens, is stepping up a new testing program for the chemicals its
farmers use. In addition, state fertilizer inspectors may get additional
auditing powers and the state Senate Food and Agriculture Committee has
scheduled a hearing on the issue Feb. 3.
As Thursday's raid indicates, work remains to improve a patchwork
regulatory system that presumes manufacturers tell the truth about their
products. On Thursday at the Eco-Farm conference in Monterey, frustrated
farmers and fertilizer makers alike called for stronger oversight.
(McClatchy Newspapers)
Synthetic nitrogen? Never mind...
January 23, 2009
Zero-Calorie
Sin? - If you thought the food nannies’ appetite for dictating what
beverages you may enjoy would be satisfied by their crusade against
regular, sugar-sweetened soda, think again. Their new battle cry is
shaping up to be, “None of the calories but all of the sin.” (Steven
Milloy, FoxNews.com)
Climate
Confusion - As a new president takes office and elevates global
warming alarmism to official federal policy, much of America is
experiencing record low temperatures. While the deep freeze amounts to
little more than irony, Americans should nevertheless take what could well
be a last opportunity to reconsider the cliff off which Barack Obama, Al
Gore and the rest of the global warming industry want us to jump. (Steven
Milloy, FrontPageMagazine.com)
Profiles
in Cowardice - The intimidation tactics and belittling words of those
in global warming alarmism are only a means to cloak the weaknesses of
their arguments, especially now that the scientific and economic evidence
has found a broader, more receptive audience -- check the latest poll
results if you don't believe me. (Paul Chesser, American Spectator)
Of 20 options gorebull warming ranks dead last: Economy,
Jobs Trump All Other Policy Priorities In 2009 - As Barack Obama takes
office, the public’s focus is overwhelmingly on domestic policy concerns
– particularly the economy. Strengthening the nation’s economy and
improving the job situation stand at the top of the public’s list of
domestic priorities for 2009. Meanwhile, the priority placed on issues
such as the environment, crime, illegal immigration and even reducing
health care costs has fallen off from a year ago. (PEW)
Dumb arithmetic of the moment: How
Green Is My Orange? - BRADENTON, Fla. — How much does your morning
glass of orange juice contribute to global warming?
PepsiCo, which owns the Tropicana brand, decided to try to answer that
question. It figured that as public concern grows about the fate of the
planet, companies will find themselves under pressure to perform such
calculations. Orange juice seemed like a good case study.
PepsiCo hired experts to do the math, measuring the emissions from such
energy-intensive tasks as running a factory and transporting heavy juice
cartons. But it turned out that the biggest single source of emissions was
simply growing oranges. Citrus groves use a lot of nitrogen fertilizer,
which requires natural gas to make and can turn into a potent greenhouse
gas when it is spread on fields.
PepsiCo finally came up with a number: the equivalent of 3.75 pounds of
carbon dioxide are emitted to the atmosphere for each half-gallon carton
of orange juice. But the company is still debating how to use that
information. Should it cite the number in its marketing, and would
consumers have a clue what to make of it?
PepsiCo’s experience is a harbinger of the complexities other companies
may face as they come under pressure to calculate their emission of carbon
dioxide, a number known as a carbon footprint, and eventually to lower it.
(New York Times)
Bottom line is: who cares? There is no need for anyone to even be
interested in how much gorebull warming potential exists since it is an
entirely fictitious construct with no real world application. The only
reason this exists is to provide a cudgel with which misanthropists
might beat humanity. Flip 'em the bird and get on with life.
What a crock! Increasing
weather losses: proof of climate change or not? - The string of
natural catastrophes that wreaked havoc in 2008, costing the global
economy $225 billion and leaving insurers with their second costliest year
in history, graphically highlights the increasing risks to businesses of
extreme weather events.
Many companies are now grappling with the consequences of more frequent
and more intense extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes,
floods and rainstorms.
January saw the heaviest rainfall in nearly a century to hit Queensland,
Australia. The resulting heavy flooding to major coalmines disrupted
production for months, pushed up the global price for coking coal and cost
insurers billions of dollars. (Lloyd's)
Unfortunately for them I live in Queensland and tend to take note of
what happens in my state -- recent storms, for example, were pretty
ordinary early monsoon storms (we just haven't had a lot of them in the
last decade or so). As a result of greenie policies restricting bush
clearing and opening decent residential land to accommodate the literal
millions of people moving to this state over the same period of
unusually quiet storm seasons we have a lot of very poorly sited housing
now -- some of that got clobbered as the inevitable storms returned and
plenty more will do so in the near future. If a return to 'normal'
seasonal storm activity is 'climate change' then it's a really good
thing since we get our water supply from these very events and water
storage infrastructure hasn't kept up with population influx (greenies,
again).
Parenthetically, mines are laying off workers due to the global
economic downturn and a current oversupply of resources, including coal
-- there is no flooding-induced shortage pushing up prices.
Tropical cyclone activity has been so sparse we now have a large
population base with no experience of the power of these tropical
storms, when we do get hit south of the Tropic again, as we inevitably
will, it is going to hurt and hurt big. It will not have anything to do
with gorebull warming.
Nude Socialist: One
last chance to save mankind - With his 90th birthday in July, a trip
into space scheduled for later in the year and a new book out next month,
2009 promises to be an exciting time for James Lovelock. But the
originator of the Gaia theory, which describes Earth as a self-regulating
planet, has a stark view of the future of humanity. He tells Gaia Vince we
have one last chance to save ourselves - and it has nothing to do with
nuclear power
Your work on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons led eventually to a global
CFC ban that saved us from ozone-layer depletion. Do we have time to do a
similar thing with carbon emissions to save ourselves from climate change?
Not a hope in hell. Most of the "green" stuff is verging on a
gigantic scam. Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just
what finance and industry wanted. It's not going to do a damn thing about
climate change, but it'll make a lot of money for a lot of people and
postpone the moment of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but
to spoil all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving
me mad. It's absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500 square kilometres
to produce a gigawatt - that's an awful lot of countryside.
What about work to sequester carbon dioxide?
That is a waste of time. It's a crazy idea - and dangerous. It would take
so long and use so much energy that it will not be done.
Do you still advocate nuclear power as a solution to climate change?
It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a
global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction
measures. (New Scientist)
D'oh! Energy Neglect
Hurting Poverty Fight: U.N. Climate Chief - NEW DELHI - Giving energy
to the poor should have been a Millennium Development Goal and a
"glaring neglect" of the sector is holding back the world's
fight against poverty, the head of the U.N. climate panel said on
Wednesday. (Reuters)
Hello! Where were you? We've been pointing out for years how the
absurd climate boogeyman and Western ecochondria have been harming the
poor. Get out of the way and get affordable energy to everyone!
Wood And Dung Fires Feed
Asia's Brown Cloud - LONDON - Wood and dung burned for home heating
and cooking makes up most of a huge brown cloud of pollution that hangs
over South Asia and the Indian Ocean during the winter months, researchers
said on Thursday.
The study in the journal Science solves the mystery of what makes up the
soot in the brown haze linked to hundreds of thousands of deaths -- mainly
from lung and heart disease -- each year in the region, they said.
"Doing something about this brown cloud has been difficult because
the sources are poorly understood," said Orjan Gustafsson, a
biogeochemist at Stockholm University.
Gustafsson led a Swedish and Indian team that used a newly developed
radiocarbon technique to measure atmospheric soot particles collected from
a mountaintop in western India and on the Maldives.
They found that two-thirds of the particles in the cloud was made up of
so-called biomass, or organic matter like wood or dung, and the rest from
fossil fuels.
The effects of the cloud, which towers up to 5 km above the ground, on
regional climate warming were significant, Gustaffson said. (Reuters)
Testimony instead of votes
on global warming - At last Wednesday’s meeting of the Joint
Committee on Energy at the state Capitol, lawmakers heard expert testimony
from scientists and policy experts who challenged conventional views on
global warming and the real-world experience of global warming policies.
But, the day before the hearing, the newly ensconced Democratic speaker of
the House of Representatives tried to shut it down, citing an alleged
rules violation in how the meeting was originally scheduled. But after
some consultation with state Senate President Bob Johnson and other
senators, Speaker Robbie Wills allowed the hearing to proceed but with
limitations: it would only be a “informational meeting” for members;
no votes would be recorded.
Dr. Richard Ford, an environmental economist at UALR and member of the
Governor’s Commission on Global Warming, had originally requested the
hearing. He and several other members of the GCGW opposed several of the
recommendations in the Commission’s recently released policy report. In
it, the Commission recommended that Arkansas lawmakers support a carbon
tax, a regional “cap-and-trade” scheme, and renewable energy portfolio
mandates for Arkansas utilities, along with other tax increases.
When the GCGW began its work, it did so with one major assumption: Global
warming is man-made. Consequently Ford and other like-minded commission
members were not allowed to debate the science of global warming.
In his opening remarks, Ford told lawmakers the Commission hadn’t
followed the intent of it statutory charter, which required it to “study
the scientific data, literature and research on global warming to
determine whether global warming is an immediate threat to the citizens in
the state of Arkansas.” For Ford it was simple: In order to get the
policies right, the group had to get the science right. He also explained
that none of the 54 policy recommendations in the report included a
cost-benefit analysis. (David J. Sanders, Arkansas News)
EU Climate Cash Windfall For
Industry In Downturn - LONDON - European factories are cashing in on
an unexpected benefit from wilting output, selling surplus carbon
emissions permits worth about 1 billion euros ($1.29 billion) to raise
funds on the carbon market.
A recession in Europe will dent industrial output this year and this will
sap energy demand and carbon emissions, leading to a surplus of permits
among big polluters including steel and cement makers.
Companies from some of the European Union's most polluting industries are
now raising funds on the carbon market to help them weather the credit
crisis. (Reuters)
Consistent
With Chronicles, Antarctic Edition - A new paper is out in Nature that
argues that the Antarctic continent has been warming. In an AP news story,
two of its authors (one is Michael Mann from the Real Climate blog) argue
that this refutes the skeptics and is “consistent with” greenhouse
warming: (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Scientists,
Data Challenge New Antarctic ‘Warming’ Study - ‘It is hard to
make data where none exist’
Comprehensive Data Round Up Debunks New Antarctic ‘Estimate of
Temperature Trends’
Washington, DC: A new study on Antarctic temperatures – which is
contrary to the findings of multiple previous studies - claims "that
since 1957, the annual temperature for the entire continent of Antarctica
has warmed by about 1 degree Fahrenheit, but still is 50 degrees below
zero.”
Despite the fact that the study was immediately viewed with major
skepticism by scientists who are not skeptical of anthropogenic global
warming claims, many in the media pounced on the study as a chance to
attack those skeptical of man-made climate doom. According to the release
of the study, “The researchers devised a statistical technique that uses
data from satellites and from Antarctic weather stations to make a new
estimate of temperature trends. […] The scientists found temperature
measurements from weather stations corresponded closely with satellite
data for overlapping time periods. That allowed them to use the satellite
data as a guide to deduce temperatures in areas of the continent without
weather stations.” (EPW)
Modeling
Aerosol-Radiation-Cloud And Precipitation Processes In The Mediterranean
Region By Kallos Et Al. 2008 - One of my colleagues, who I have the
highest respect for, Professor George Kallos of the University of Athens,
has another excellent study of a weather and climate issue, which is
reported on below. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Weblogs
By My Coauthors Of Our Rejected EOS Forum Article - There are weblogs
by my co-authors on our rejected submission to EOS which Climate Science
weblogged on yesterday; see An Obvious Double Standard Adopted By The AGU
Publication EOS
Their weblogs are “of consensus and consistency“ by Fergus Brown and
”Your opinions, please” by James Annan. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Real
Climate [Gavin Schmidt] Response To The Climate Science Post “Comments
On Real Climate’s Post “FAQ on climate models: Part II” -
Further Reply By Gavin Schmidt to this Climate Science posting [his reply
to my comment #150]. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
I'm not sure whether to commend Roger's attempts to bring science to
a propaganda site or wonder at his naivety in trying to do so...
Calendar-date stress kills trees? Old-Growth
Forests Dying Off in U.S. West - Tree deaths have doubled, and global
warming may be the cause, experts say
THURSDAY, Jan. 22 -- Trees in old-growth forests in the Western United
States are dying at twice the rate they were a few decades ago, and
experts suspect regional warming is to blame.
The report, led by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), found that the
increase in tree deaths has included trees in a variety of forests,
elevations and sizes. Species have included pine, fir, hemlock and other
coniferous trees. In addition, the rate of new tree growth has not
changed, according to the report in the Jan. 23 issue of Science. (HealthDay
News)
Seasons now arrive two days earlier than they used to, one study
from scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, and Harvard
University concluded. Not only have average worldwide temperatures been
rising for the last 50 years, according to the report, but the hottest
day of the year has shifted to almost two days earlier.
Really? According to that 'study' all seasons are arriving 2
days earlier -- i.e. there is absolutely no change in season length or
order, merely that the day of year, an entirely human construct
to begin with, has drifted slightly. Are we now to believe trees obsess
over human's time concept and are dying of stress induced by calendar
dates? Puh-lease!
<chuckle> Must be running out of things to worry about: Spring
Arriving Earlier, Study Finds - WASHINGTON - Looking forward to
spring? The good news is that it is coming two days earlier on average,
but so are summer, autumn and winter, researchers said on Wednesday.
They found that on average, the hottest day of the year in temperate
regions has moved forward by just under two days, and so has the coldest
day of the year.
While the consequences of this shift are not clear, it is worrying,
Alexander Stine of the University of California, Berkeley and colleagues
said. (Reuters) [em added]
Hollywood
Henry Waxman Promises Cap and Trade by Memorial Day - If Hollywood
Henry Waxman has his way, we might have to cancel the Indianapolis 500
this year. At least, he claims to be racing to adopt a “cap and trade”
anti-global warming bill through his committee by the time the engines rev
on Memorial Day. (Christopher C. Horner, Human Events)
Socialists just can't get away from wealth transfer schemes: EU
To Propose $200 Billion Climate Tax On Rich Nations - BRUSSELS/LONDON
- Rich nations could raise $200 billion in climate funds through a levy on
their greenhouse gases from 2013-2020 to help poor countries prepare for
global warming, the European Union will say next week.
The plan is set out in an EU paper outlining the bloc's position ahead of
U.N.-led climate talks in Copenhagen in December, meant to agree a new,
global climate treaty.
The fund-raising idea is the most specific yet from any rich country or
bloc on how to persuade developing nations to agree binding, concrete
steps to slow their greenhouse gas emissions -- one of the key obstacles
in climate talks so far.
The draft paper to be published next week, and seen by Reuters, calls on
rich countries to pay for developing countries to cut their greenhouse
gases, called mitigation, and prepare for unavoidable warming, called
adaptation. (Reuters)
Until relatively recently Americans at least knew that the path to
social justice and equality is paved with wealth generation (even in
parlance Americans spoke of "making a dollar", not
"redistributing" [read: stealing] someone else's). Sadly even
the US appears infected with the disease of socialism and without rapid
and radical course correction faces inevitable decline and decay.
Offshore Drilling Plan To Go
Ahead: Interior Dept - WASHINGTON - A proposal issued in the final
days of the Bush administration to expand offshore drilling in previously
banned areas will move forward under the administration of U.S. President
Barack Obama, an Interior Department spokesman told Reuters on Wednesday.
(Reuters)
Lights
Out: Playing Energy Politics Will Backfire on JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie
Dimon - BusinessWeek named Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, as one
of the "Best Managers of 2008" for steering the bank clear of
most of the subprime mortgage icebergs that wrecked many of his
competitors.
Unfortunately, the managerial skills that enabled Dimon to avoid the worst
of the subprime mess are completely missing when it comes to energy
policy.
Expressing frustration about U.S. energy policy and its dependence on
foreign oil at the Yale University CEO Summit last December, Dimon said,
“We need a real energy policy and it’s going to have to include taxing
people on energy so that energy costs stay up and people buy smaller cars
and smaller homes.”
Speaking on a leadership panel at the Centennial Global Business Summit
last October at Harvard University, Dimon also called for higher taxes on
energy. He criticized political leaders for lack of leadership “we
don’t have the fortitude to tax oil, or to tax BTUs” and he proposed
“taxing oil as it's pumped from the ground, rather than simply taxing
gasoline at the pump.”
By calling for tax increases on traditional energy sources, Dimon is
joining the war against fossil fuels while displaying a textbook
description of a limousine liberal.
Most troubling, however, is this: Dimon is using the vast political and
financial resources of JPMorgan to bring his energy policy vision to
reality. (Tom Borelli, Townhall)
British
government schemes to undermine European emissions law - UK officials
want to weaken European proposed laws that would limit the UK's emissions
– but which they say will boost bills and cut supplies
The UK government is lobbying to water down proposed EU legislation to
impose tough new emission limits on power plants in order to guarantee
Britain's energy security and keep down electricity prices.
Whitehall is warning, according a briefing document leaked to green
campaigners and seen by the Guardian, that electricity prices would
increase by 20% if the proposed legislation isn't changed. It is also
concerned that the new rules would threaten the security of the UK's
electricity supply. (The Guardian)
Coal Will Still
Be King - But can capturing and storing it make it climate friendly? -
"Coal plants are factories of death," declared NASA climate
modeler James Hansen in a letter to President Barack Obama and First Lady
Michelle Obama. Last year, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), now chairman of
the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, introduced the
"Moratorium on Uncontrolled Power Plants Act of 2008." That bill
would have placed a moratorium on issuing permits for new coal-fired power
plants that don't have the ability to capture and store carbon dioxide
emissions. Since that technology is still being tested, it means that no
new coal-fired power plants would have been permitted. In early 2008,
Obama told the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle, "If
somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it
will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all
that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."
Why the opposition to coal? After all, the U.S. is energy independent with
respect to this resource, with 275 billion tons in proven reserves, which
is more than enough to meet our energy needs for hundreds of years. The
chief problem is that burning coal produces carbon dioxide emissions which
are warming the planet. Burning coal emits 10 percent more carbon dioxide
than oil and 60 percent more than natural gas. (Ronald Bailey, Reason)
The 'it' of which Bailey writes is carbon dioxide, which renders the
entire question moot -- there is simply nothing climate unfriendly about
carbon dioxide. This is such a stupid game.
The
cost of the biofuel boom on Indonesia's forests - The clearing of
Indonesia's rainforest for palm oil plantations is having profound effects
– threatening endangered species, upending the lives of indigenous
people, and releasing massive amounts of carbon dioxide, writes Tom
Knudson from Yale Environment 360, part of the Guardian Environment
Network
Helping
peanut butter heads prevail - Hopefully we won’t have a repeat of
the tomato hysteria of 2008. Not only did widespread misinformation and
continuation of media scares cause a nationwide panic that devastated the
country’s farmers and tomato industry, countless people needlessly
feared a “tomato death.” Many people may still feel a bit of
trepidation about enjoying a tomato salad.
This month, the media hasn’t missed an opportunity to continue to
heighten scares over “tainted” peanut butter. Few consumers have heard
that the source of this outbreak of salmonella (salmonella typhimurium)
has already been traced by epidemiologists at state health departments,
the CDC and FDA to a single food plant in Blakeley, Georgia (Peanut
Corporation of America), which supplies bulk peanut butter ONLY to food
manufacturers and commercial institutions. This plant does not sell
consumer products, like jars of peanut butter.
No national brand of peanut butter is affected. “There is no indication
that any national name brand jars of peanut butter sold in retail stores
are linked to the PCA recall,” states the FDA.
Those jars of peanut butter in your pantry and peanut butter cookies and
PB&Js your mother makes have not been linked in any way to this
outbreak. (Junkfood Science)
Want
to lose weight? Don't count on pills - CHICAGO - Users of Alli, the
first weight-loss drug approved for sale over-the-counter in the United
States, are finding what they likely suspected all along: pills are no
magic substitute for diet and exercise.
Yet as Americans engage in the New Year's tradition of resolving to shed
pounds, the market for diet aids is expected to remain firm, even as the
economy is mired in recession. (Reuters)
Obesity
epidemic shows perils to health reform - CHICAGO - For years, Bob
Clegg's insurance company paid out some $3,000 a month for doctor visits,
drugs and medical devices to treat the health problems caused by his
obesity.
In September 2007, when his weight peaked at 380 pounds (172 kg), he had
gastric bypass surgery, and now his health issues -- joint pain, sleep
apnea and esophageal problems -- have vanished, and so have the medical
bills.
But even though the surgery -- in which the stomach is made smaller and
part of the intestine is bypassed -- has saved his insurance company
money, Clegg, who now weighs 240 pounds (108 kg), had to pay the $20,000
cost out of his own pocket.
"It wasn't until the doctor said my sleep apnea was at a point where
we seriously had to consider a tracheotomy that we talked about gastric
bypass," said Clegg, 54. "The irony is that insurance would pay
for the tracheotomy, but not the surgery." (Reuters)
Reforms
unlikely to defeat obesity - CHICAGO - Even as the Obama
administration recognizes obesity as one of the nation's top health
threats, any efforts to reform the U.S. healthcare system will likely not
go far enough to combat the condition.
"Obesity is one of many competing demands placed on the healthcare
system. It has got our attention, but there just aren't great ideas about
what to do about it," said Eric Finkelstein, a health economist at
RTI International and author of "The Fattening of America: How the
Economy Makes Us Fat."
"It's individual behavioral changes that are needed and that's
difficult to deal with on a federal level," he said. (Reuters)
Trials
for Parents Who Chose Faith Over Medicine - WESTON, Wis. — Kara
Neumann, 11, had grown so weak that she could not walk or speak. Her
parents, who believe that God alone has the ability to heal the sick,
prayed for her recovery but did not take her to a doctor.
After an aunt from California called the sheriff’s department here,
frantically pleading that the sick child be rescued, an ambulance arrived
at the Neumann’s rural home on the outskirts of Wausau and rushed Kara
to the hospital. She was pronounced dead on arrival.
The county coroner ruled that she had died from diabetic ketoacidosis
resulting from undiagnosed and untreated juvenile diabetes. The condition
occurs when the body fails to produce insulin, which leads to severe
dehydration and impairment of muscle, lung and heart function.
“Basically everything stops,” said Dr. Louis Philipson, who directs
the diabetes center at the University of Chicago Medical Center,
explaining what occurs in patients who do not know or “are in denial
that they have diabetes.”
About a month after Kara’s death last March, the Marathon County state
attorney, Jill Falstad, brought charges of reckless endangerment against
her parents, Dale and Leilani Neumann. Despite the Neumanns’ claim that
the charges violated their constitutional right to religious freedom,
Judge Vincent Howard of Marathon County Circuit Court ordered Ms. Neumann
to stand trial on May 14, and Mr. Neumann on June 23. If convicted, each
faces up to 25 years in prison.
“The free exercise clause of the First Amendment protects religious
belief,” the judge wrote in his ruling, “but not necessarily
conduct.” (New York Times)
Sigh... The
fate of Canada's unicorns of the sea - What narwhals can teach us
about the climate change tipping point.
TORONTO — In these heady days of hope and audacity, the fate of some 600
narwhals in Canada’s Arctic has the makings of a cautionary tale.
These unicorns of the northern seas, creatures of legend and imagination,
regularly feed around Baffin Island in Canada’s high north. In late
September they migrate to open waters to escape the encroaching ice.
Last fall, the ice was late in forming so the whales lingered. Then it
formed in a flash, trapping them by late November in rapidly shrinking
breathing holes. Video images showed narwhals jostling to gasp for air,
their spiral tusks jutting out like exhausted pleas for help.
Canadian fisheries officials, convinced the whales were doomed to drown or
die of starvation, allowed the local Inuit to “harvest” the trapped
narwhals. They were shot, harpooned and dragged from the water in a bloody
ritual that lasted days. The meat and muktuk was a boon for the 1,300
Inuit living in Pond Inlet, for whom hunger is a too-common reality.
Animal welfare groups, meanwhile, denounced the slaughter, insisting the
government should have tried to free the whales with an icebreaker. But
the incident’s lessons run deeper.
Canadian officials chalked it up to a “misfortune of nature.”
But Inuit hunters, noting that the last mass trapping of narwhals occurred
75 years ago, blamed global warming. Arctic ice, as numerous scientific
studies tell us, is melting at an accelerated rate. Freezing comes later,
and suddenly. (Sandro Contenta, GlobalPost)
... the last time anyone noticed a mass trapping of narwhals was 75
years ago, so this must be gorebull warming at work.
Early 19th Century
British “Environmentalism” - Environmentalism is the social
movement of the “landed interest” – an interest parallel to that of
neither business nor labour. “Environmentalism” is readily
identifiable in early 19th century Britain. This essay draws from the
best-known writings of the era’s three most influential intellectuals
for a portrait of an anti-democratic, anti-liberal social movement based
in the aristocracy but claiming to represent the masses; a movement
permeated with the ideas of over-population theorist T. Malthus; a
movement benefitting from restricting land supply and suffering from
advancing agricultural technology; that fought a cultural civil war using
literary Romanticism and monkish asceticism; that was militantly
protectionist regarding agriculture; that constrained industrial progress
and spread fear of catastrophe. (William Walter Kay, Environmentalism is
Fascism)
Only
Four Years Left to Save Environmentalism - Another sure sign that
environmentalists are struggling to sustain a rational basis for their
influence emerged last week. The pages of the Observer featured the
opinion of NASA activist/scientist James Hansen in two articles [1 , 2]
and an editorial.
Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark
assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who
last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the
devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that
action will have to be taken within Obama’s first administration, he
added.
Of all the hopes pinned on Obama, ’saving the world’ has to be the
most revealing of the hoper, be it the Observer Journalist, the Observer,
or Hansen.
As we pointed out last Thursday, the environmental movement’s only
leverage is the prospect of catastrophe. It has no popular appeal in any
real sense. So when it appears that governments are ‘on-message’, or
in any way sympathetic to its concerns, the only way to sustain its
undemocratic and unaccountable influence is to escalate the sense of
urgency, or their function will become redundant. (Climate Resistance)
Australian Beef
Association is Totally Opposed to any form of Emissions Trading - The
Concept is Similar to a Gambling Casino Based on Hot Air
ABA Chairman, Brad Bellinger said, “The ABA Board had met last week and
decided to oppose any form of Emissions Trading. He said that the
Australian Government will be acting like speculative fools, if it goes
down a path of trading something that cannot be accurately measured.”
He continued, “Since the 1997 Kyoto Summit, we have seen the UN try to
run a Clean Development Mechanism, - with no success. We have seen the
European Commission try Carbon Permits. They got their sums wrong and the
large power and oil companies made fortunes at governments’ expense. The
people are taxed - as they will be in Australia if we go down this mad
path.”
“We have seen the World’s bankers make complete fools of themselves
and bankrupt millions, as they trade in derivatives, which they haven’t
completely understood. Now, Emissions Trading will be even worse, as
people trade an unmeasurable commodity, as if in a gambling casino run by
the unknowing. To see it even considered as the recession deepens; - makes
one wonder,” Mr Bellinger said. (Carbon Sense Coalition)
January 22, 2009
High Noon Passes:
Global Warming Didn’t Show Up at the Inaugural - Well, the noon
temperature in Washington DC at the President Obama’s swearing-in was 28
degrees F., eight degrees colder than when Bush was sworn in eight years
ago. (Sam Kazman, Cooler Heads)
Ambition
redefined by financial wreckage - Every now and then something
unexpected transforms the political environment. For George W. Bush it was
the September 11 terrorist attacks. For Barack Obama it took place even
before he was sworn in. And it came from an unlikely quarter.
Last week’s report by the normally sub-radar Congressional Budget Office
projecting a $1,200bn deficit for 2009 and $1,000bn fiscal deficits as far
as the eye can see, sent shock waves through Washington, which look set to
redefine what is possible for most of Mr Obama’s first term.
Just a few weeks earlier – and even amid the growing wreckage of the
deepening US recession – Mr Obama’s transition team still felt
confident enough to signal that they saw the financial meltdown as an
opportunity to push through a “big bang” package of election promises.
These included a decisive move towards universal healthcare, enactment of
a “cap and trade” system to tackle global warming and big new
investments in education, infrastructure, scientific research, and
expanding the size of the US military. Then the CBO dropped its fiscal
bombshell.
Suddenly the crisis threatened to overwhelm everything. “Do not
underestimate the deep psychological impact the CBO numbers have had on
Washington,” says Bill Galston, a leading scholar of US politics and
former Clinton White House official. “All of a sudden, it has become the
gatekeeper of what is possible. If something fails the fiscal test, then
it doesn’t look very possible any more.” (Edward Luce, Financial
Times)
Obama
demands action to tackle "a warming planet" - "We will
harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our
factories"
President Obama delivered some broad promises for environmentalists and
green businesses in his inauguration speech yesterday, referring to the
challenge presented by global warming and explicitly highlighting
renewable energy as one of the key components of his administration's
economic stimulus package.
In a speech heavy on symbolism, President Obama focused on the hard road
ahead for both America and the wider world. He committed to "roll
back the spectre of a warming planet," striking a strong contrast
with his predecessor, whose administration repeatedly quashed reports
confirming global warming fears, worked to stop regulators from using
existing legislation to combat climate change, and refused to sign up to
international agreements to curb carbon emissions. (Danny Bradbury and Tom
Young, BusinessGreen)
President Obama
Already Addressing Global Warming - Anyone who lives in the nation’s
capital knows that it has been FREEZING, with well below average
temperatures. Even today, inauguration day, started out with the wind
chill in single digits. It’s good to know that the president already is
seeking to fulfill his promise to halt global warming. After all, as
candidate Barack Obama told us in his June speech celebrating having
locked up the Democratic Party nomination. (Doug Bandow, CEI Open Market)
Beyond
Belief - Despite years of media bombardment about the imminent dangers
of global warming, the alarmists are losing ground. Fewer Americans are
buying into the myth. (IBD)
Anxiety
Grows in Global Warming Alarmist Camp - Heartland Institute media
monitors have noted on several occasions that climate-change alarmists are
finding it increasingly difficult to maintain their position that human
activity has warmed Earth to crisis proportions.
Polar bears keep growing in numbers, Antarctic ice keeps expanding,
deserts keep receding, temperatures keep easing, the ranks of science
skeptics keep multiplying. It's tough to scare people with that kind of
sound-science evidence.
Now the folk at DeSmogblog - created like so many alarmist sites for the
sole purpose of attacking conservatives, libertarians and global warming
skeptics - is getting really worried. (Heartland Institute)
An
Obvious Double Standard Adopted By The AGU Publication EOS - In the
January 20, 2009 issue of the AGU publication EOS, there is Feature
article by P.T. Doran and M. K. Zimmerman titled “Examining the
Scientific Consensus on Climate Change”. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Predicted
Climate Cooling - Another Example Of Overstating Our Understanding Of
Climate Science - There have been claims that the Earth is entering
period of strong climate cooling; e.g. see Earth
on the Brink of an Ice Age
Such predictions of cooling, however, are no more substantiated by
skillful validated predictions of this cooling, than are the IPCC
predictions of more-or-less uniform global warming. (Roger Pielke Sr.,
Climate Science)
We've already warned everyone to treat the Pravda item with extreme
caution - this is what we said 10 days ago:
This item was also submitted to JunkScience.com by Fegel, an
author unknown to us but apparently from Portland, Oregon. He appears to
be a frequent contributor to Pravda and has anti-American, anti-Israeli
rants scattered about the web, sometimes under the handle "cloudmessenger".
His scientific credentials, if any, are unknown.
Predictions are very hard to make -- especially about the future, as
Yogi Berra is reported to have said. This is particularly true where
climate is concerned and we can not predict future temperature trends.
Increasing
Atmospheric CO2: Manmade…or Natural? - I’ve usually accepted the
premise that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are due
to the burning of fossil fuels by humans. After all, human emissions
average around twice that which is needed to explain the observed rate of
increase in the atmosphere. In other words, mankind emits more than enough
CO2 to explain the observed increase in the atmosphere.
Furthermore, the ratio of the C13 isotope of carbon to the normal C12 form
in atmospheric CO2 has been observed to be decreasing at the same time CO2
has been increasing. Since CO2 produced by fossil fuel burning is depleted
in C13 (so the argument goes) this also suggests a manmade source.
But when we start examining the details, an anthropogenic explanation for
increasing atmospheric CO2 becomes less obvious. (Roy W. Spencer)
Blair
calls for 2020 carbon targets for developed world - Former prime
minister argues that setting "interim targets" for 2020 at
Copenhagen later this year would show emerging economies the West is
serious about cutting emissions
Former prime minister Tony Blair today closed the World Future Energy
Summit in Abu Dhabi by calling on the developed world to agree to tough
"interim" carbon emission targets for 2020 at climate change
talks in Copenhagen later this year.
Blair said that while all countries the bulk of the obligation for
ensuring that target is met should fall on developed economies, and as
such they should demonstrate their commitment to tackling climate change
by signing up to a separate interim target for 2020.
He argued that "an interim target for the developed world would send
a clear signal" to emerging economies that the West is willing to
invest in cutting emissions, making it easier for negotiators to convince
large emerging economies such as China and India to sign up to the
agreement.
Blair did not say at what level the interim targets should be set, but any
discussion on the topic that does take place in Copenhagen is likely to be
based on the EU's commitment to cut emissions by 20 per cent on 1990
levels by 2020. (Tom Young, BusinessGreen)
Sell-off
forces EU carbon to record lows - EUAs hits record low of €11.60 as
watchers warn market has "detached" from oil prices
The price of carbon credits in the EU's emissions trading scheme reached a
record low for the current phase of the scheme of just €11.60 as many of
the large scale emitters covered by the scheme continued to offload their
EUA carbon credits.
The price of EUAs has been on a steady slide since the start of the year
when they stood just shy of €16 a tonne and market watchers are
concerned that the price of carbon is no longer tracking oil prices.
Rising oil prices typically lead to an increase in the price of carbon, as
they tend to result in energy producers switching from gas to more carbon
intensive coal – a scenario that leads to increased demand for carbon
credits.
However, the price of carbon has failed to track recent fluctuations in
the oil price, prompting fears that any increase in demand for credits
from energy companies arising from changes in the oil price is being
outweighed by the on-going sell off of credits amongst heavy industries
fearful that the recession will lead to reduced production levels. (James
Murray, BusinessGreen)
Khosla
shuns CCS in favour of coal-to-cement - Leading Silicon Valley venture
capitalist touts new technology capable of turning waste CO2 into building
cement
A new breed of carbon capture technologies capable of turning CO2
emissions into cement could soon provide a cost effective alternative to
high profile, but as yet unproven, carbon capture and storage (CCS)
systems, according to one of the world's leading clean tech venture
capitalist.
Speaking at the World Future Energy Summit in Abu Dhabi today, Vinod
Khosla, a leading silicon valley venture capitalist who in recent years
has become a major investor in clean technologies, said that CCS
technologies were simply too expensive to achieve mainstream adoption and
as such more cost effective alternatives are required.
"I believe CCS is too expensive and so we are looking at a technology
that turns CO2 into cement building materials," he said, adding that
he had invested an undisclosed sum in California-based Calera, a company
that pioneers CO2-to-cement technology.
Calera has been in stealth mode for a number of years, its website stating
only that it is "dedicated to reversing global warming and ocean
acidification by trapping the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, in the built
environment".
However, the company has now provided fresh details of its plan to pull
carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and sequester it in cement that can
be used as a building material. (Tom Young, BusinessGreen)
Almost funny: Warming
in Antarctica Looks Certain - Antarctica is warming.
That is the conclusion of scientists analyzing half a century of
temperatures on the continent, and the findings may help resolve a climate
enigma at the bottom of the planet.
Some regions of Antarctica, particularly the peninsula that stretches
toward South America, have warmed rapidly in recent years, contributing to
the disintegration of ice shelves and accelerating the sliding of
glaciers. But weather stations in other locations, including the one at
the South Pole, have recorded a cooling trend. That ran counter to the
forecasts of computer climate models, and global warming skeptics have
pointed to Antarctica in questioning the reliability of the models.
In the new study, scientists took into account satellite measurements to
interpolate temperatures in the vast areas between the sparse weather
stations.
“We now see warming is taking place on all seven of the earth’s
continents in accord with what models predict as a response to greenhouse
gases,” said Eric J. Steig, a professor of earth and space sciences at
the University of Washington in Seattle, who is the lead author of a paper
to be published Thursday in the journal Nature. (New York Times)
This is the lower-troposphere
time series for the southern polar region and this is the mid-troposphere.
Warming is conspicuous by its absence.
And this tells you pretty much all you need to know about the
'study':
In this Letter, we use statistical climate-field-reconstruction
techniques to obtain a 50-year-long, spatially complete estimate of
monthly Antarctic temperature anomalies. In essence, we use the spatial
covariance structure of the surface temperature field to guide
interpolation of the sparse but reliable 50-year-long records of 2-m
temperature from occupied weather stations. Although it has been
suggested that such interpolation is unreliable owing to the distances
involved, large spatial scales are not inherently problematic if there
is high spatial coherence, as is the case in continental Antarctica.
From this (and a couple of dozen mostly coastal measuring sites) they
claim they have teased out a West Antarctic warming of approximately one
one-hundredth of one degree per year. Most impressive is that Nature
felt it worth publishing. Speaks volumes, really.
Follow
Up On Today’s AP Article By Seth Borenstein Entitled “Study:
Antarctica Joins Rest Of Globe In Warming” - An AP
article was released today which reports on a Nature paper on a
finding of warming over much of Antarctica. I was asked by Seth Borenstein
to comment on the paper (which he sent to me). I have been critical of his
reporting in the past, but except for the title of the article (which as I
understand is created by others), he presented a balanced summary of the
study. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Termite
Insecticide Found to be Potent Greenhouse Gas - An insecticide used to
fumigate termite-infested buildings is a strong greenhouse gas that lives
in the atmosphere nearly 10 times longer than previously thought, UC
Irvine research has found.
Sulfuryl fluoride, UCI chemists discovered, stays in the atmosphere at
least 30-40 years and perhaps as long as 100 years. Prior studies
estimated its atmospheric lifetime at as low as five years, grossly
underestimating the global warming potential.
The fact that sulfuryl fluoride exists for decades – coupled with
evidence that levels have nearly doubled in the last six years –
concerns study authors Mads Sulbaek Andersen, Donald Blake and Nobel
Laureate F. Sherwood Rowland, who discovered that chlorofluorocarbons in
aerosol cans and other products damage the ozone layer. That finding led
to a worldwide ban on CFCs. (A to Z of Clean Technology)
If we were them we wouldn't remind anyone about the CFC
farce, since it's about as bad as 'science' gets.
Do More Greenhouse
Gases Raise The Earth’s Temperature? - "Do More Greenhouse
Gases Raise The Earth’s Temperature? That is the critical climate
question and the one that I have agonised over most because even if human
CO2 only increased the global air temperature permanently by a small
amount then over a long enough period of time the effect would accumulate
and could be dangerous." (Stephen Wilde, Co2sceptic)
Blame
Corn Harvesters For The Crash Of Flight 1549 - CHURCHVILLE VA—Did
global warming dump U.S. Airways flight 1549 into the Hudson River by
attracting more geese to New York airports? Time Magazine says yes. Time
notes a four-fold increase in airplane bird strikes since 1990, and blames
global warming and destruction of wild bird habitat for the increased
collisions.
Time reached the wrong conclusion. Research indicates we should blame the
prosaic corn harvester—and perhaps our attempt to expand corn production
for biofuels. Canada geese numbers have increased five-fold since 1970 for
one overwhelming reason —farmers’ expanding use of those big corn
picker-shellers. The big bright-colored harvesters now roar across the
fields every autumn, picking the ears and shelling the corn kernels. With
millions of tons of loose corn, some inevitably trickles to the ground,
where the geese cheerfully snack it up. (Dennis T. Avery, CGFI)
Green
energy tariffs to get cheaper - Good Energy announces it is to cut
green tariff by 7.5 per cent on back of falling wholesale electricity
prices
One of the UK's leading providers of green energy has today announced that
it is to cut its tariffs and predicted that other providers could soon
follow suit.
Good Energy said that will cut its standard electricity and gas tariffs
for both business and domestic customers by 7.5 per cent from the end of
this month. The company said that the move would save the average domestic
dual fuel customer £62 a year.
Juliet Davenport, chief executive of Good Energy, said that the company
was due to start paying less for its renewable power in 2009 and was now
looking to pass that saving on to customers.
The drop in renewable energy prices has been prompted by cuts in wholesale
electricity prices, which have fallen around 40 per cent from last year's
peaks as a result of plummeting oil and gas prices. (James Murray,
BusinessGreen)
Britain
under fire for failing to join renewable energy league - Britain's
attempts to position itself as a centre for the green power industry
suffered a blow today when it emerged that ministers have refused to
commit the country to a new international body set up to promote renewable
power.
The German environment secretary, who came up with the idea for the
International Renewable Energy Agency, said he was disappointed countries
such as the UK and America were dragging their feet. (The Guardian)
UN-backed
body confirms plans for global aviation emissions cap - Top
International Civil Aviation Organisation official says inclusion of
aviation in European emissions trading scheme will not affect plans for
global cap-and-trade scheme
The UN-backed International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) last week
confirmed it is pressing ahead with plans for an international carbon
emissions cap-and-trade scheme for the aviation industry, despite the
emergence of a growing number of potentially rival regional schemes.
Speaking at a meeting of global transport ministers in Tokyo, Roberto
Kobeh Gonzalez, president of the ICAO's Council, told news agency Reuters
that EU proposals to include aviation in its regional emissions trading
scheme (ETS) would not derail the organisation's plans to build a
framework that could underpin a global scheme.
The EU's plans have attracted plenty of criticism from the aviation
industry, which fears that the potential inclusion of airlines in regional
trading schemes, such as the EU scheme and planned similar initiatives in
Australia, South Korea and the US, would increase costs and create a
skewed competitive landscape that penalises those airlines operating in
certain territories.
US airlines have already threatened to take legal action against the EU
scheme, while The Association of Asia-Pacific Airlines has also voiced
concerns over a scheme it believes would adversely affect long-haul
flights from Asia. (James Murray, BusinessGreen)
Exclusive:
UK government poised to set out CCS rules - Top official reveals
definition on what constitutes a "carbon capture ready" power
station is just weeks away
The UK government will make an announcement in the next few weeks on what
power companies must do to ensure their plants are ready to be fitted with
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the future, completing the groundwork
for the long-anticipated decision on whether to approve plans for a new
generation of coal-fired power stations.
Speaking to BusinessGreen.com on the sidelines of the World Future Energy
Summit in Abu Dhabi, Bronwen Northmore, director of cleaner fossil fuels
policy in the UK's Department of Energy and Climate Change, said that a
decision on what constitutes a "carbon capture ready" plant was
in the pipeline.
"We've been consulting on capture readiness in the past few months
and we'll be making a policy announcement in the next few weeks," she
said.
The government has said previously that it will only grant approval for
new coal-fired power plants, including the proposed plant at Kingsnorth
Kent if they are "carbon capture ready". (Tom Young,
BusinessGreen)
Why
it's time to throw some light on the energy efficient lighting row -
With the Daily Mail attempting to whip up opposition to energy saving
light bulbs, many businesses would be forgiven for asking if green bulbs
really are such a good idea. BusinessGreen.com trains its spotlight on a
surprisingly complex debate
The Daily Mail campaign against the removal of incandescent bulbs from UK
shops earlier this month ricocheted through the media, generating comments
and criticisms from all sides of the debate and leaving consumers and
businesses in a state of confusion as to where the truth lies in this
complex topic.
After all, as The Guardian pointed out with glee, only a year ago The Mail
had been running enthusiastic free giveaways of the very bulbs they were
now criticising.
So where does the truth really lie? Are energy efficient Compact
Fluorescent Lights (CFL) a cost-saving no brainer, or as The Mail claims
are they an inferior product to traditional alternatives with added health
risks thrown in?
Let's start with the big picture. (John May, BusinessGreen)
Struggling
Schwarzenegger eyes enviro rule roll back - California governor angers
environmental groups with proposal to ditch green planning rules in order
to accelerate job-creating infrastructure projects
Tensions are rising between environmental groups and California's Governor
Schwarzenegger as he seeks to rein in environmental protection measures in
an attempt to kickstart the economy.
Schwarzenegger has built himself a reputation as a world leader on
tackling climate change and has imposed some of the most stringent green
regulations anywhere in the US since he took office.
However, his state's budget crisis is now so severe that some reports
claim the government will run out of money next month - a scenario that
prompted Schwarzenegger to write to President-Elect Obama earlier this
month, asking him to "Waive or greatly streamline National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) requirements consistent with our
statutory proposals to modify the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA)
for transportation projects".
CEQA demands that an environmental review is undertaken before any project
requiring Government approval can go ahead.
The move was seized upon by green groups as evidence that the Governor was
seeking to roll back important environmental protections in an attempt to
accelerate state capital investment projects. (Danny Bradbury,
BusinessGreen)
Industry
Scrambling to Comply with Child Safety Act - The children’s book
industry is currently dealing with a new and pressing challenge that is
threatening publishers, bookstores, libraries and schools. It’s not the
economy or school spending or reading rates—it is a recent act of
Congress, which has blindsided the industry with the implementation of
stiff safety standards on all children’s products, and whose application
to books is vague. It has left many publishers, retailers and industry
groups scrambling to interpret the law and determine what kinds of
compliance will be required, and at what cost. (Karen Raugust, Publishers
Weekly)
Government
scientific adviser: GM may help feed growing population - Bob Watson
to argue research is needed to determine whether GM crops can help feed
growing population in world affected by climate change
One of the government's chief scientific advisers will wade into the
debate on genetically modified (GM) foods later today, by arguing that
they could make a valuable contribution to feeding the growing global
population as the climate continues to change.
Speaking as part of a debate on the role of GM to mark the opening of the
Science Museum's new Future Foods exhibition, Bob Watson, chief scientific
adviser at Defra, will make the case for further scientific trials to
gauge the risks and benefits GM crops could deliver.
"People are asking how we will be able to feed the world’s growing
population during a time of dangerous climate change," he will say.
"While GM food is clearly not the whole answer, it may contribute
through improved crop traits such as temperature, drought, pest and
salinity tolerance. Hence additional scientific studies will allow us to
assess the risks and benefits."
The comments will be roundly condemned by many green groups which have
long opposed so-called "frankenfoods" and in some cases even
taken direct action to disrupt scientific trials for GM crops.
However, advocates of GM are increasingly arguing that modified crops with
improved yields may represent one of the most effective means of feeding a
growing population, avoiding the need to resort to yet more intensive
agricultural techniques and further deforestation. (James Murray,
BusinessGreen)
January 21, 2009
Oh dear... 9
Ways NASA Can Tackle Climate Change - Scientists tell Pres. Barack
Obama how the space agency could help solve the world's number one problem
NASA could be one of the nation's most potent weapons in battling climate
change. The space agency has conducted decades of research into weather,
life-support systems and the atmospheres of other planets providing it
with unique skills to address this problem.
It would be easy for policymakers to overlook NASA as they map out a
strategy for solving Earth's biggest environmental woes. But here are some
important reasons why they shouldn't. (SciAm)
... gathering data from space is a worthwhile enterprise only
if you do something useful with it. That does not include proliferating
hysterical nonsense about gorebull warming.
Bizarrely, NASA's GISS does not use satellite data to
guesstimate global temperature but prefers to perform voodoo
incantations over appallingly corrupt near-surface amalgams.
One should wonder why a space agency declines to use data sourced at
least partly from its own satellites, data virtually free of urban heat
island contamination and with the greatest and most uniform global
coverage by far, while promoting its space-borne observation platforms
as a solution to a problem like enhanced greenhouse when its space-borne
platforms demonstrate observed atmospheric trends can not possibly be
due to enhanced greenhouse in the first place.
Met
Office forecasts a supercomputer embarrassment - A new £33m machine
purchased to calculate how climate change will affect Britain, has a giant
carbon footprint of its own
For the Met Office the forecast is considerable embarrassment. It has
spent £33m on a new supercomputer to calculate how climate change will
affect Britain – only to find the new machine has a giant carbon
footprint of its own.
“The new supercomputer, which will become operational later this year,
will emit 14,400 tonnes of CO2 a year,” said Dave Britton, the Met
Office’s chief press officer. This is equivalent to the CO2 emitted by
2,400 homes – generating an average of six tonnes each a year. (The
Times)
What
happened to the climate consensus? - CAN we all agree – yet – that
the issue is settled?
Scientists DON’T all agree the planet is warming precipitously, or that
humans are responsible for that supposed warming. In fact, more and more
experts in a number of fields have been speaking up to challenge the
supposed scientific "consensus" on climate change.
As the headlines scream out the latest sensational warning – a NASA
scientist now predicts U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has just four
years to save the planet – let’s not forget that last month, more than
650 international scientists went on record as dissenting from the
man-made global warming findings of the United Nations Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (Chronicle Herald)
Lawrence
Solomon: Obama’s America — a denier nation - Americans will have
two messages for Barack Obama at his inauguration today: We love you but
don’t blame us for climate change.
In a national survey released on the eve of Obama’s inauguration by
Rasmussen Reports, the U.S. polling company, a majority of Americans —
51% — now believe that humans are not the predominant cause of climate
change. Only 41% blame humans and 9% aren’t sure. Just one month ago,
the same pollster found that just 43% of Americans let us humans off the
hook while 46% blamed humans and 11% were not sure. Last July, fully 50%
blamed humans. (Financial Post)
Certainly worth featuring again: The
Contradictions of the Garnaut Report - The present world financial
crisis has seen the great economist John Maynard Keynes making a comeback,
with even a fiscal conservative like Kevin Rudd espousing Keynesian
deficit finance. Keynes is also remembered for his remark that “madmen
in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from
some academic scribbler of a few years back”. That is an apt description
of the climate change mantras that led to the appointment of the Garnaut
Review, and the Review’s Final Report itself exhibits frenzy distilled
from not a few scribblers of the past, including Malthus, Jevons and
Arrhenius of the nineteenth century, Paul Ehrlich, the Club of Rome and
the IPCC’s John Houghton of the last century, not forgetting James
Hansen (of the Goddard Institute of Space Studies) and his acolyte Al
Gore.
Ehrlich and the Club of Rome confidently predicted exhaustion of all
mineral resources by 2000 if not before, and the Garnaut Report merely
extends the final date to 2100. Malthus earned fame with his theory that
while population grows “geometrically”, for example by doubling every
twenty-five years (we would say exponentially) food production grows only
“arithmetically”, that is, by the same absolute amount in every time
period.
Arrhenius took over this formulation in his celebrated paper of 1896 that
remains the cornerstone of the anthropogenic global warming (or climate
change) movement, by asserting that while atmospheric carbon dioxide
“increases in geometric progression, augmentation of the temperature
will increase in nearly arithmetic progression”. Arrhenius won a real
Nobel for proceeding to calculate that if carbon dioxide increased by 50
per cent from the level in 1896, global average temperature would increase
by between 2.9 and 3.7 degrees, depending on season, latitude and
hemisphere, with a global annual mean of 3.42 degrees. The level of carbon
dioxide has nearly increased by 50 per cent since 1896—faster it is true
than Arrhenius expected—but global temperature according to the Goddard
Institute has increased by just 0.73 degrees. (Tim Curtin, Quadrant)
You
Say It Best When You Say Nothing at All - Before Seth Borenstein tells
the woolly kids at SEJ how to spin this
claim, take a quick look at what it does and does not say.
While the harsh winter pounding many areas of North America and Europe
seemingly contradicts the fact that global warming continues unabated, a
new survey finds consensus among scientists about the reality of climate
change and its likely cause. A group of 3,146 earth scientists surveyed
around the world overwhelmingly agree that in the past 200-plus years,
mean global temperatures have been rising, and that human activity is a
significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. . .
.
In trying to overcome criticism of earlier attempts to gauge the view of
earth scientists on global warming and the human impact factor, Doran and
Kendall Zimmerman sought the opinion of the most complete list of earth
scientists they could find, contacting more than 10,200 experts around the
world listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's
Directory of Geoscience Departments. Experts in academia and government
research centers were e-mailed invitations to participate in the on-line
poll conducted by the website questionpro.com. Only those invited could
participate and computer IP addresses of participants were recorded and
used to prevent repeat voting. Questions used were reviewed by a polling
expert who checked for bias in phrasing, such as suggesting an answer by
the way a question was worded. . . .
Two questions were key: have mean global temperatures risen compared to
pre-1800s levels, and has human activity been a significant factor in
changing mean global temperatures. About 90 percent of the scientists
agreed with the first question and 82 percent the second. In analyzing
responses by sub-groups, Doran found that climatologists who are active in
research showed the strongest consensus on the causes of global warming,
with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role. Petroleum geologists and
meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 and 64
percent respectively believing in human involvement.
Any details about what was actually asked would be enlightening, because,
at least as reported, the prompt-and-response prima facie actually
say nothing (“human activity,” “a role,” “involvement”), and
are already being spun as saying everything (that the very authors find
this necessary tells you what you need to know about the results’
worth). Despite much pre-buttal in the release about the integrity of the
questions, the actual questions were not provided. Surely they will be in
the journal article when published. (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Comments
On Real Climate’s Post “FAQ on climate models: Part II” - Real
Climate has a weblog titled “FAQ
on climate models: Part II”.
Climate Science has a response to several of the questions that are posed
there as well as questions for Gavin Schmidt [who wrote the Real Climate
Q&A]. Climate Science has already posted on Part I of the Real Climate
FAQs; see Real
Climate Misunderstanding Of Climate Models, which Gavin has either not
seen, or cared to respond to. In either case, he continues to incorrectly
communicate important aspects of modeling on Real Climate. (Roger Pielke
Sr., Climate Science)
The
Politics of Big Science - As the federal government has inserted
itself into the sciences, the underlying principles of science research
and conduct have been damaged. The conduct of science, the conduct of many
scientists, and the standards of evidence in science, has declined over
decades. It is not limited to the ongoing global warming scandal but
certainly includes it. (Michael R. Fox, Hawaii Reporter)
What
the Solar Cycle 24 ramp up could look like - Guest post by David
Archibald
With respect to the month of minimum, it is very likely that Solar Cycle
24 has started simply because Solar Cycle 23 has run out. Most solar
cycles stop producing spots at about nineteen years after solar maximum of
the previous cycle. Solar Cycle 23 had its genesis with the magnetic
reversal at the Solar Cycle 22 maximum. As the graph above shows, Solar
Cycle 23 is now 19 years old. Only 9% of the named solar cycles produced
spots after this. (Watts Up with That?)
Jones et al 2009: Studies
Not "Independent" - One of the ongoing Team mantras has been
that the Mann hockey stick has been supported by a "dozen independent
studies". Obviously, I've disputed the claim that these studies are
"independent" in any non-cargo cult use of the term
"independent". A new article by Jones and multiple coauthors
(Holocene 2009) comments on this issue. (Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit)
realclimate and
Disinformation on UHI - In a recent CNN interview discussed at RC
here, Joe D'Aleo said:
Those global data sets are contaminated by the fact that two-thirds of
the globe's stations dropped out in 1990. Most of them rural and they
performed no urban adjustment. And, Lou, you know, and the people in your
studio know that if they live in the suburbs of New York City, it's a lot
colder in rural areas than in the city. Now we have more urban effect in
those numbers reflecting — that show up in that enhanced or exaggerated
warming in the global data set.
Gavin Schmidt excoriated this claim as follows:
D'Aleo is misdirecting through his teeth here. … he also knows that
urban heat island effects are corrected for in the surface records, and he
also knows that this doesn't effect ocean temperatures, and that the
station dropping out doesn't affect the trends at all (you can do the same
analysis with only stations that remained and it makes no difference).
Pure disinformation. (Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit)
New CO2 Truth-Alert: Elevated
CO2: How Sweet it is ... for Sugarcane!
Click
here to watch short videos on various global warming topics. Embed any
Truth Alert video on your own web page or to watch it on YouTube in a
higher resolution.
New Major Report
CO2,
Global Warming and Coral Reefs: Prospects for the Future: The ongoing
rise in the air's CO2 content has been predicted to
play havoc with earth's coral reefs in two different ways: (1) by
stimulating global warming, which has been predicted to dramatically
enhance coral bleaching, and (2) by lowering the calcium carbonate
saturation state of seawater, which has been predicted to reduce coral
calcification rates. We evaluate the likelihood of such claims in a new
major review paper.
Editorial
Coral Reefs and
Climate Change: Unproved Assumptions: What are they? ... and what do
they suggest about climate-alarmist claims relating to the future of
earth's corals?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 657
individual scientists from 384
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from New
Zealand's Western South Island. To access the entire Medieval Warm
Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary
Temperature
(Urbanization Effects - North America): What have we learned about the
urban heat island effect from data obtained in North America?
Plant Growth Data
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Corn,
Epilithic
Lichen, Petunia,
and Sugar
Maple/Quaking Aspen.
Journal Reviews
Floods of the
Mississippi River System: What has caused the majority of them in
modern times?
High-Flow and
Flood Trends of UK Rivers: Are their magnitudes increasing, as climate
alarmists suggest they should be?
Erosive Rainfall
Anomalies of Southern Italy: How have they responded to earth's
"unprecedented" modern warmth?
A Century of
Parana River Streamflow Data: To the beat of what drummer does the
river's flow rate rise and fall?
Soil Microbial
Respiration: How does it respond to rising temperatures?
(co2science.org)
Oil Prices
and Oil Demand: The Need For Stable Prices - In reality, we can
recognize peaks and valleys only after the fact. For example, looking back
we can see the “dot com” bubble, or spike, that occurred in the year
2000. The NASDAQ, currently at about 1,500, reached 5,000, a level that
will probably not be seen again for decades, if ever.
Similarly, due to the recent rapid price decline, we can now look back at
the oil price bubble, or spike. Between early 2007 and late 2008, oil
futures rose from about $50 per barrel to about $150 per bbl and then fell
to less than $50. This brief duration of high prices appears more like a
spike than a bubble.
The brief duration of the spike gives us an unusual opportunity to learn
something of the lag time that exists between a change in price and the
resulting impact on demand. While no rigorous study of the lag time is
possible because of the dynamic nature of the various economic factors at
work, we can get some sense of this element by comparing the demand data
with the price performance. This comparison is shown in the following
graph. (William R. Edwards, Energy Tribune)
Oil Price
Over $100, in a Blink - The Cassandras are out in force these days.
Some are true believers. Others are masochistic oil men. They claim that
the recent price of oil -- at almost $150 -- was a “spike” fomented by
speculators. And now that the oil price is down, it will never go over
$100 again, it may even go down to $10 or it will stay at $30, forever.
Some of these analysts have written for this publication. How US-based
speculators, as blamed by a recent TV show, can cause the wild ride
towards $150 oil, is mystifying. This was supposed to happen while world
oil consumption was more than four times that of the US. Big, bad oil is
no longer blamed for the price hike?
The analysts are right on one thing. There was never really a rational
reason for $150 oil. Headlines ruled and speculators did ride them. But
oil at $40 is also irrational, fed by headlines about the economic crisis.
There are three main reasons why oil cannot stay at $40 or even $70.
(Michael J. Economides, Energy Tribune)
Coal
industry 'at risk with no cash support' under carbon reduction scheme
- THE $60 billion coal industry is at risk without greater support for
clean coal, the Opposition warned yesterday after the nation's only
commercial project in the field said it would be unviable under the
proposed emissions trading scheme.
The Australian revealed yesterday that ZeroGen had warned Resources
Minister Martin Ferguson that the Rudd Government's carbon pollution
reduction scheme would be a "significant barrier" to the
development of clean coal.
ZeroGen is understood to have laid off or redeployed staff from its
corporate division recently. The company would not comment yesterday, but
said in a statement there had been "no reductions from project
staffing, and none are planned".
Gas suppliers say they can provide cleaner energy than conventional
coal-fired electricity for less than renewables if clean coal is delayed.
Coal industry sources warned of a bleak future without greater support for
clean coal research. (The Australian)
Abu
Dhabi has second thoughts about London Array and wind power - Fresh
doubts have emerged over Britain’s plans for a huge expansion of
offshore wind power after Abu Dhabi said yesterday that it was
reconsidering the viability of a £3 billion scheme to build the world’s
largest offshore wind park in the Thames Estuary.
The London Array project, a plan to build 341 turbines with the capacity
to generate 1,000 megawatts of electricity – more than that produced by
most of the nuclear reactors in Britain – has been in trouble since last
May, when Shell pulled out of the project, citing spiralling costs. (The
Times)
Give them money to employ people to do nothing useful? Wind
Power Jobs To Double In EU By 2020 - BRUSSELS - Employment in the wind
power industry will more than double in the European Union to around
330,000 in 2020, according to a report issued on Tuesday.
The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) also called for greater
investment in the renewable energy sector as governments seek to stimulate
economic recovery.
"Wind power not only has the potential to satisfy the increasing
electricity demand in a sustainable manner, it is also a significant and
vital stimulus to economies," EWEA Chief Executive Christian Kjaer
said. (Reuters)
Electric
cars will need lots of financial support - report - Electric cars have
a big role to play in reducing the world's greenhouse gas emissions, but
it's going to cost a lot, according to a new report. It could even push
automakers into further trouble.
For electric and hybrid vehicles to achieve their environmental potential,
the world's governments will need to step in with high levels of financial
support for consumers and industry, according to a report by the Boston
Consulting Group, a management consulting firm. And the cost savings in
fuel won't be nearly enough to provide the incentive without that
government cash.
Electric vehicles could realistically make up a significant fraction of
the world's car market in the foreseeable future, but not nearly a
majority, according to BCG. "The costs of creating an automotive
market dominated by electric and hybrid cars are prohibitively high,"
said the report. (CNNMoney.com)
We
are all now abnormal and all shall have a pill - No, it’s not your
imagination. They really said that.
As news media reported (verbatim from the press release), a new study
published in the American Heart Journal found that nearly two-thirds of
patients admitted to hospitals for heart attacks and cardiovascular events
had low LDL-cholesterol levels, indicating they were not at high risk for
heart problems. Yet — in another extraordinary example of ad-hoc
reasoning — the authors concluded that since most heart attacks are
occurring in people with low cholesterol levels, that this provided
support for lowering the LDL-cholesterol goals even further. (Junkfood
Science)
Inaugural
edition of Grand Rounds - Grand Rounds, a weekly gathering of the best
medical blog articles hosted by a different blogger every Tuesday, is now
up at MedPageToday. In this issue, medical bloggers writing “from the
trenches” submitted a wide range of ideas for healthcare reform. They've
been compiled into the top ten suggestions to policy makers in Washington.
(Junkfood Science)
From
mad to worse - Christopher Booker reports yet
another case of hapless toilers, who have had their livelihoods taken
from them by bureaucratic theft, and then been turned into criminals for
trying to carry on their forefathers’ trade of centuries. What they did
was perfectly reasonable to an unbiased observer. They caught hake, which
were plentiful, and sold them for food. Remarkably, in fact, it is not
even a crime any more. They were forced by poverty into trying to disguise
the fact that they were carrying out what has always been perfectly
legitimate trade. And what about that judge? The judiciary sit on their
large stipends and more than comfortable pensions, telling people on the
breadline, who have had their livings taken by legitimised theft, that
they are acting out of greed. And can it really be true that the fishermen
themselves “were not permitted to speak in their own defence.” Is this
what has become of British justice, to say nothing of natural justice?
(John Brignell, Number Watch)
January 20, 2009
Interesting... 44%
Say Global Warming Due To Planetary Trends, Not People - Al Gore’s
side may be coming to power in Washington, but they appear to be losing
the battle on the idea that humans are to blame for global warming.
Forty-four percent (44%) of U.S. voters now say long-term planetary trends
are the cause of global warming, compared to 41% who blame it on human
activity.
Seven percent (7%) attribute global warming to some other reason, and nine
percent (9%) are unsure in a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone
survey.
Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democrats blame global warming on human
activity, compared to 21% percent of Republicans. Two-thirds of GOP voters
(67%) see long-term planetary trends as the cause versus 23% of Democrats.
Voters not affiliated with either party by eight points put the blame on
planetary trends.
In July 2006, 46% of voters said global warming is caused primarily by
human activities, while 35% said it is due to long-term planetary trends.
In April of last year, 47% of Americans blamed human activity versus 34%
who viewed long-term planetary trends as the culprit. But the numbers have
been moving in the direction of planetary trends since then. (Rasmussen
Reports)
Al got
a Nobel for "efforts to build up and disseminate greater
knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for
the measures that are needed to counteract such change" and
Jimmy has just
been honored by the AMS for "clear communication of climate
science in the public arena" -- while public skepticism
increases. Who knew those two were doing such a great job? Certainly
they are having a much more positive effect than I gave them credit for.
IPCC
Teams Up with WorldWatch to Attack Obama - The “policy neutral”
IPCC is once again making a mockery of its role of an arbiter of
scientific information, in favor of all out political advocacy. EurActiv
reports the details: (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Questions
for Obama's science guy - IN NOMINATING John Holdren to be director of
the Office of Science and Technology Policy -- the position known
informally as White House science adviser -- President-elect Barack Obama
has enlisted an undisputed Big Name among academic environmentalists, one
"with a resume longer than your arm," as Newsweek's Sharon
Begley exulted when the announcement was made. Holdren is a physicist, a
professor of environmental policy at Harvard, a former president of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, the director of the
Woods Hole Research Center, and the author or co-author of many papers and
books.
He is also a doom-and-gloomer with a trail of erroneous apocalyptic
forecasts dating back nearly 40 years -- and a decided lack of tolerance
for environmental opinions that conflict with his.
The position of science adviser requires Senate confirmation. Holdren's
nomination is likely to sail through, but conscientious senators might
wish to ask him some questions. Here are eight: (Jeff Jacoby, Boston
Globe)
How the
world was bullied into silence - One of the most disturbing aspects of
the global warming scam is the number of prominent people and entire
segments of society bullied into silence. Consider the case of Dr. Joanne
Simpson described as follows. “the first woman in the world to
receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, who has authored more
than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent
scientists of the last 100 years.” Then consider her statement. “Since
I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding,
I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical...
The main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is
the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models. We
all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system.” No,
we don’t all know the frailty of the models! Certainly most of the media
and thereby the public and politicians don’t know, otherwise the latter
would not be planning completely unnecessary, incredibly expensive and
society altering policies. But the opening comment is actually frightening
and speaks to why the scam has progressed so far. “Since I am no
longer affiliated with any organization nor receive any funding, I can
speak quite frankly.”
Undoubtedly, there are positions and times when people are muzzled;
national security is a good example. I sympathize with young people
starting out on careers. I understand the pressure of maintaining a family
and paying mortgages. But none of this should apply to science. It’s a
measure of the degree to which climate change has become political. It’s
also a measure of the degree of bullying that has occurred. Why would a
scientist in an organization directly involved in climate science not feel
free to speak out? But they are not the only ones who have kept quiet.
Entire segments of society have either remained silent or taken evasive
action. Few had the courage to even ask for a full and open debate. Now
everything is changing as the claims of warming are offset by the
realities of cooling. (Tim Ball, CFP)
Struggle
over climate change on the horizon - Wasn’t all that warm fuzziness
over the election of Obama just so... so... warm and fuzzy?
Now for cold and hard-edged. That describes the emotions over the
intragovernmental fights that get going in earnest this week. The most
immediate are over the nature of the economic stimulus, or who has the
longest reach. When that is settled within the next couple of months, the
struggle moves on to harder issues, such as the massive rework of
environmental law and regulation.
The most serious struggle will be over climate change, or the regulation
of carbon emissions. You can forget all the chit chat about finding a
consensus on this one: the coal people and the enviros are in this match
until one side is carried out.
For now, it appears that most of the enviros working within the
legislative process intend to use a cap-and-trade programme to reduce
carbon emissions. That is, large carbon dioxide emitters such as
coal-based utilities will be able to buy the right to produce CO2. Those
who, one way or another, are deemed to have reduced carbon emissions can
sell emission rights to the emitters. The programme would be designed so
that over time the supply of carbon rights becomes tighter, the price
higher, and the incentive to reduce carbon emissions even greater. Climate
change moderates, polar bears have more ice, and so on.
Wall Street and Chicago always like the creation of trading markets for
new assets, especially if they can be inefficiently priced by the
professionals. So while the coal people hate climate legislation, a lot of
traders see an opportunity. (Financial Times)
Weather
and climate: noise and timescales - A few days ago, an alarmist
nicknamed Tamino (Grant Foster) wrote a shallow posting about the
extrapolation of trends: What if?
Foster argues that one can't blindly extrapolate trends, especially not
the cooling ones. Well, I agree with the first part of the sentence but
unlike Foster, I think that one should blindly extrapolate neither cooling
nor warming trends. I agree that the absence of a warming trend since 1998
(and the fact that 2008 was the coolest year since 2000; and it was also
cooler than 1998, of course) doesn't mean that we know that there won't be
any warming in the next 50 years. But in the same way, the existence of
some warming in the last 100 years doesn't mean that there will be the
same - or even much larger - warming in the 21st century. (The Reference
Frame)
Facts
debunk global warming alarmism - THE National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration reported that October in the US was marked by 63 record
snowfalls and 115 lowest-ever temperatures.
Over the past few years, similar signs of colder than usual weather have
been recorded all over the world, causing many people to question the
still fashionable, but now long outdated, global warming alarmism. Yet
individual weather events or spells, whether warmings or coolings, tell us
nothing necessarily about true climate change.
Nonetheless, by coincidence, growing recognition of a threat of climatic
cooling is correct, because since the turn of the 21st century all real
world, long-term climate indicators have turned downwards. Global
atmospheric temperature reached a peak in 1998, has not warmed since 1995
and, has been cooling since 2002. Some people, still under the thrall of
the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change's disproved projections of
warming, seem surprised by this cooling trend, even to the point of
denying it. But why? (Bob Carter, The Australian)
Another deceptive and largely irrelevant Antarctic Peninsula piece: Antarctic
ice shelf set to collapse - WILKINS ICE SHELF - A huge Antarctic ice
shelf is on the brink of collapse with just a sliver of ice holding it in
place, the latest victim of global warming that is altering maps of the
frozen continent.
"We've come to the Wilkins Ice Shelf to see its final death
throes," David Vaughan, a glaciologist at the British Antarctic
Survey (BAS), told Reuters after the first — and probably last — plane
landed near the narrowest part of the ice.
The flat-topped shelf has an area of thousands of square kilometres
(miles), jutting 20 metres (65 ft) out of the sea off the Antarctic
Peninsula. (Reuters)
The Wilkins has persisted a little longer into the Holocene than
might have been expected because it lies between Alexander, Charcot, and
Latady islands. The region shows no discernable atmospheric
temperature trend over the last 30 years. Basically the southern
hemisphere is cool to neutral, the tropics are pretty ordinary while
there has been slight warming in the northern temperate grading to
interesting warming in the northern frigid zone. Of course we hear a lot
about the 5-10% of the globe behaving at least partially as climate
models suggest it should but about 10% kind of right always used to be
read as ~90% dead wrong -- I believe "epic fail" is how my son
would term it.
Runway-Loving Birds Are Risk
To Planes In Antarctica - Air traffic experts are seeking ways to
scare off the south polar skuas, a large and aggressive brown seabird, but
without harming them. The birds are protected by the 47-nation Antarctic
Treaty, which declares the frozen continent a nature reserve.
At the British Rothera research station on the Antarctic Peninsula, about
100 skuas often sit on the 900 meter (3,000 ft) gravel runway. The odd
penguin or seals can also be hazards. (Reuters)
Imagine that -- even Polar critters like to be warm...
“Hudson
air crash caused by ‘global warming’” - The scare: In late
January 2008, Time magazine blamed the bird-strike that brought down an
Airbus passenger aircraft in the Hudson River, New York, on “global
warming”. This was the latest in a long series of articles in
scientifically-unaware mainstream news media, blaming real or imagined
climate events on “global warming”. Such alarmism defies Occam’s
razor, the philosophical principle by which the simplest explanation of an
event is nearly always the true explanation. The Time article said that
“Wildlife mitigation” was the official term for avoiding bird strikes.
A report published in June 1988 by the Federal Aviation Administration had
found that since 1990 the number of bird strikes had quadrupled, from
1,759 in 1990 to a record 7,666 in 2007. According to Time, “Officials
cite a number of possible causes for the increase”, including “habitat
destruction and climate change”, which “have disrupted migratory
patterns”. Time adds, “Al Gore should be very proud of himself.”
(Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
Oh boy... Global
warming may cut protein in plants - Plants may give us fewer of the
nutrients we need to survive if global warming is not controlled, a
visiting expert says.
Fossil expert Dr Scott Wing, who was in New Zealand to speak at the
Greenhouse Earth Symposium at Te Papa last week, said a study suggested
ancient plants may have made less protein as CO2 levels rose.
If the theory is correct, insects were left hungrier when plants made less
of the protein they needed to live.
The phenomenon could affect humans if plants begin cutting protein again.
Fossil records show insects began eating more plants about 55 million
years ago, when the planet suddenly warmed up.
Dr Wing, who is the curator of fossil plants at the Smithsonian
Institution in Washington, acknowledged there may have been more insects
around to eat the plants. (New Zealand Herald)
... this guy sees an upswing in the number of fossilized
insect-damaged leaves from a period of higher atmospheric CO2
and assumes this means the same number of insects had to eat more to
consume sufficient protein. Most biologists equate such signs with
increased biological activity in a life-friendly period.
Here's one for interpretation: Survey:
Scientists agree human-induced global warming is real - While the
harsh winter pounding many areas of North America and Europe seemingly
contradicts the fact that global warming continues unabated, a new survey
finds consensus among scientists about the reality of climate change and
its likely cause. (University of Illinois at Chicago)
It's
time to pray for global warming, says Flint Journal columnist John
Tomlinson - If you're wondering why North America is starting to
resemble nuclear winter, then you missed the news.
At December's U.N. Global Warming conference in Poznan, Poland, 650 of the
world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a
media generated myth without basis. Said climatologist Dr. David Gee,
Chairman of the International Geological Congress, "For how many
years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet
is not warming?"
I asked myself, why would such obviously smart guy say such a ridiculous
thing? But it turns out he's right. (Flint Journal)
Indonesia Delays
Forest-Carbon Rules - SINGAPORE - Indonesia has delayed releasing
complete regulations on using carbon credits to protect rainforests,
preferring to fine-tune rules that could earn the country billions of
dollars and curb the pace of climate change. (Reuters)
Record
Temperature Data At The Weblog Hall Of Record - Bruce Hall has an
excellent presentation of temperature records in the United States on his
weblog “Updating Statewide Monthly Temperature Extremes”.
Among his valuable comments, he writes
“The U.S. analysis showed that the late 1990s were indeed hot and had
a greater than normal expected level of statewide monthly records. What it
also showed, however, was that the 1930s had a much higher frequency of
those records. Finally, it showed a sharp tailing off of such extremes
beginning with the new century.
I have completed the review of the high temperature extremes through 2008
and there were no additional statewide month high temperature records. An
analysis of the 2005 - 2008 data for minimum temperature records will be
started shortly.”
His entire posting is worth reading. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Spinning furiously: CLIMATE
CHANGE: Don't Be Fooled by Europe's Arctic Winter - BERLIN, Jan 19 -
"Where is global warming, now that we need it?" a comedian asked
on German public television ARD. And across Europe people have been asking
the same question: if the globe is getting warmer, why is Europe freezing?
But the question really is whether recent winters taken together have been
too warm. Yes, say climate researchers, they have.
"There is a cognitive problem among the public," Mojib Latif,
climate researcher at the Leibniz Institute for Ocean Sciences at the
University of Kiel, some 300 km west of Berlin, told IPS. "Because
winters over the past 20 years have been warmer than the older average,
many now believe that this winter is particularly cold. But it is
not."
"Of course it is really cold right now," Fortunat Joos,
professor of climate and environmental physics at the University of Bern
in Switzerland told IPS. "But present temperatures represent only a
fluctuation in the trend of the past 20 years. In general, the earth is
getting warmer. (IPS)
Tibetan Glacial Shrink To Cut
Water Supply By 2050 - NEW YORK - Nearly 2 billion people in Asia,
from coastal city dwellers to yak-herding nomads, will begin suffering
water shortages in coming decades as global warming shrinks glaciers on
the Tibetan Plateau, experts said.
The plateau has more than 45,000 glaciers that build up during the snowy
season and then drain to the major rivers in Asia, including the Yangtze,
Yellow, Brahmanputra and Mekong.
Temperatures in the plateau, which some scientists call the "Third
Pole" for its massive glacial ice sheets, are rising twice as fast as
other parts of the world, said Lonnie Thompson, a glaciologist at Ohio
State University, who has collected ice cores from glaciers around the
world for decades. (Reuters)
Lonnie should know better than that. Glaciers grow and shrink through
precipitation rather than having significant direct correlation with
temperature.
Eye roller: Rising Sea
Levels Threaten East Coast - WASHINGTON - Sea levels on the United
States' mid-Atlantic coast are rising faster than the global average
because of global warming, threatening the future of coastal communities,
the Environmental Protection Agency said on Friday.
Coastal waters from New York to North Carolina have crept up by an average
of 2.4 to 4.4 millimeters (0.09 to 0.17 inches) a year, compared with an
average global increase of 1.7 millimeters (0.07 inches) a year, the EPA
said in a report. (Reuters)
Dead
On Arrival: EPA/CCSP Sea Level Rise Report Already Outdated - On
Friday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a report
on the implications of future sea level rise on the mid-Atlantic coast
(from North Carolina to New York). The report was one of the series of
21-reports commissioned by the U.S. Climate Change Research Program
(recall our less than favorable reviews of another recent CCSP product).
As with most climate change “assessment reports” from large government
and intergovernmental efforts, the science in the report is stale and
out-of-date by the time the report is finally published (the EPA’s
recent documents in support of its “Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking: Regulating Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act”
is a prime example). (WCR)
The
Movement Movement - One of the most toxic effects of
environmentalism’s tendency to reduce human needs and wants to problems
that need to be contained and controlled is found in the debate over
transport policy. Movement itself is threatened by demands that we reduce
our ‘impact’ on the world. We are urged not to take ‘unnecessary’
journeys and to take them in the least carbon-intensive ways, or the
carbon calculator will be used to prove our guilt. (Climate Resistance)
Another Crone article of faith: Energy
Inefficient - From plug-in cars to carbon capture to wind farms linked
to “intelligent” power grids, many of the solutions pitched to
restructure the country’s energy system and confront global warming rely
on a faith in high tech: we expect, or at least hope, that an Apollo
project, the energy equivalent of the dot.com revolution or some other
burst of creative genius will engineer the problem away.
Obviously, game-changing technologies will play a big role in cutting
America’s consumption of fossil fuels. They will also be essential to
achieving the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that most scientists
think will be necessary to avoid the worst consequences of climate change.
But as it frames its strategy to deal with both problems, the Obama
administration cannot overlook the low-hanging fruit — the gains to be
had from making existing technologies more efficient. (New York Times)
How could The Crone get it so wrong and how fitting they
should bring up the dot.bomb era, since such a debacle is all too likely
in the current scam-rich environment. NYT's stupidity
notwithstanding we do not have a carbon crisis to deal with -- carbon is
the stuff of life and returning some to the atmosphere from whence it
came is probably the best thing humans have done and ever will do for
the biosphere.
Massive
Confusion in the New York Times - Today’s New York Times has an
editorial in which it claims that:
The plain truth is that the United States is an inefficient user of
energy. For each dollar of economic product, the United States spews more
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than 75 of 107 countries tracked in the
indicators of the International Energy Agency. Those doing better include
not only cutting-edge nations like Japan but low-tech countries like
Thailand and Mexico.
The first problem with this set of claims is that the New York Times
confuses energy efficiency with carbon dioxide intensity of the economy.
The second error is that the New York Times uses market exchange rates as
the basis for evaluating U.S. carbon dioxide per dollar of GDP against
other countries, rather than the more appropriate metric of international
GDP comparisons using purchasing power parities.
So the New York Times makes a muddle of reality when it suggests that the
United States is an “inefficient user of energy” suggesting that 70%
of all contries are more efficient than the United States.
This is just wrong. (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Just say no
to oil revenues? - Petroleum production bans cost us billions that
could pay for stimulus plans and renewables
Plummeting stock and housing prices have triggered a painful recession,
America’s worst job losses since 1945, and trillions in lost national
wealth.
California is grappling with a $42-billion budget deficit. That’s more
than the GDP of 112 countries. Maryland, Virginia, New York and other
states likewise face billion-dollar budget shortfalls.
Congress and the White House want a $1-trillion “stimulus” for the
banking, auto and steel industries, roads, bridges and ports, and
“worthy” projects like water parks, parking garages and fitness
centers.
They also support expanded renewable energy programs that will require
tens of billions in subsidies and tax breaks – but provide intermittent
electricity and deliver only 5-15% of their “rated capacity” during
peak summer demand periods.
Many states have oil, gas, coal uranium and other energy and mineral
resources, within their borders or off their coasts. Development would
produce critically needed energy, reduce oil and gas imports, create
millions of jobs, buttress our national security, and generate trillions
of dollars in lease bonus, rent, royalty and tax revenues, to help pay
these bills.
California could nearly double its offshore oil production within 12-18
months, without installing a single new platform, by using directional
drilling technology to bore more wells from existing platforms. (Paul
Driessen, CFP)
Moronic Environmentalists
cheer shelving of Enbridge oilsands pipeline - CALGARY - Environmental
groups say they will keep leaning on Ontario to curb its reliance on
oilsands crude, even though Calgary-based pipeline company Enbridge Inc.
is shelving a project that would have brought more of that oil into the
province.
A report by Environmental Defence and Forest Ethics Monday said Enbridge's
$346-million Trailbreaker project would have effectively choked off
Ontario's supply of light sweet crude oil from overseas, which they
believe has fewer environmental impacts than oilsands crude. (CP)
Brazil Landless
Peasants Aim To Extend Fight To Oil - SAO PAULO - Brazil's Landless
Workers' Movement marked its 25th anniversary on Monday by pledging to
extend its fight against capitalism to ensuring the country's new oil
wealth remains in state hands.
Since state energy company Petrobras announced in 2007 it had discovered
massive light oil reserves off Brazil's southern coast, talk has swirled
that the government would take greater control over the oil wealth.
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is considering whether to create a new
state-run oil company to manage oil production from new
"subsalt" reserves, but foreign oil firms like Royal Dutch Shell
Plc will still have a major role in production.
"The MST is ready to do what is needed to guarantee that Brazil's
oil, especially the subsalt discovery, won't be privatized. This means
battles, marches, occupations, public campaigns -- a series of
actions," Joao Paulo Rodrigues, one of the movement's leaders, told a
news conference in Sao Paulo.
The movement, probably the world's largest land reform group, is known as
the MST.
Rodrigues denied that the movement's new focus was a reaction to a loss of
supporters in the countryside, where its campaign has struggled in the
face of an agriculture boom and a lack of help from the Lula government.
(Reuters)
King
coal is on the rise once again - SCOTTISH Coal, the UK's largest
open-cast coal mining group, is back in the black and has revealed plans
to reopen old sites and bring new sites into production to meet increased
demand. (The Scotsman)
Clean
coal plan dirtied by ETS - THE Rudd Government's climate change
strategy has been thrown into disarray by a warning that clean coal will
not be viable under the proposed emissions trading scheme.
Clean coal is crucial to the Government's plans to tackle climate change,
but the chief executive of the flagship ZeroGen project has told Resources
Minister Martin Ferguson the carbon pollution reduction scheme will be a
"significant barrier" to the development of clean coal
technology.
"Australia's 5 per cent carbon reduction target accompanied by a weak
carbon price will be nowhere near sufficient to generate the scale of
investment needed to make clean coal technologies economically
viable," Anthony Tarr warns Mr Ferguson in a letter obtained by The
Australian.
More German
Biodiesel Plants Face Closure In 2009 - BERLIN - More German biodiesel
plants face closure in 2009 following government's decision to raise taxes
on green fuels and to scale back an increase in biofuel blending in fossil
fuels, a biofuels industry leader said on Monday.
Germany's biodiesel industry, Europe's largest, was working at
considerably under 60 percent of its five million-ton annual capacity,
Johannes Lackmann, chief executive of German biofuels industry association
VDB, said.
"Many medium and small size plants will have little chance of
survival this year," he told Reuters at the Green Week food trade
fair in Berlin. "I think more will close."
Germany increased taxes on biodiesel on Jan 1 this year which hit demand
in the country's domestic market. A series of biodiesel plants closed last
year, largely because taxes on green fuels had cut sales. (Reuters)
What
do healthy eating and lifestyles have in common with woo? - A
courageous article appeared in the Journal of the American Medical
Association on Wednesday. It was momentous because it may be the first
article in a mainstream medical journal to expose the similarities between
the promotion of healthy diet and lifestyle modifications for the
prevention of heart disease and premature death, and pseudoscience and
alternative modalities.
This is one medical article we won’t see reported by the media.
(Junkfood Science)
Research Exposes
the Risk to Infants from the Chemicals Used in Liquid Medicines -- A
team of medical scientists from the University of Leicester has published
research which looks into the harmful substances in liquid medicines that
premature babies are being exposed to.
Research published today (Jan 20) ahead of print in the Fetal &
Neonatal Edition of Archives of Disease in Childhood documents the
non-drug ingredients (excipients) present in liquid medicines given to
premature infants as part of their medical care. (PhysOrg.com)
Surprising new
health and environmental concerns about tungsten - In the article,
C&EN Associate Editor Rachel Petkewich notes that scientists have long
held that tungsten is relatively insoluble in water and nontoxic. As a
result, the U.S. military developed in the mid 1990s so-called "green
bullets" that contain tungsten as a more environmentally-friendly
alternative to lead-based ammunition.
But studies now show that tungsten, which is also used in welding, metal
cutting, and other applications, is not as chemically inert as previously
thought. Some forms of tungsten can move readily though soil and
groundwater under certain environmental conditions. Both the U.S.
Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency now classify
the element as an "emerging contaminant" of concern. (ACS)
MPs
may be denied vote on £100 bin tax - THE GOVERNMENT has quietly
adopted powers enabling it to introduce national pay-as-you-throw rubbish
taxes of up to £100 without a vote in parliament.
The move, which was confirmed this weekend by the Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), will allow councils across
the country to impose extra charges on householders who leave out too much
non-recyclable waste.
The fact that ministers have adopted powers to impose the taxes on
millions of households without a vote in the Commons will shock MPs. They
always believed they would be able to veto the unpopular move following
trials in five pilot areas.
Last week the government also sidelined parliament to move ahead with
plans to introduce a controversial third runway at Heathrow airport.
The Tories discovered the bin tax measure in a little-noticed clause of
the Climate Change Act.
“New taxes are being imposed by arrogant and out-of-touch rulers,
showing contempt for the democratic process. The imposition of
extra-parliamentary taxation is a constitutional outrage,” said Eric
Pickles, shadow communities and local government secretary.”
Internal Whitehall documents released last year showed the government is
planning for at least two-thirds of all homes to be hit by the bin taxes.
(Sunday Times)
Nile Delta fishery
grows dramatically thanks to run-off of sewage, fertilizers - While
many of the world's fisheries are in serious decline, the coastal
Mediterranean fishery off the Nile Delta has expanded dramatically since
the 1980s.
The surprising cause of this expansion, which followed a collapse of the
fishery after completion of the Aswan High Dam in 1965, is run-off of
fertilizers and sewage discharges in the region, according to a researcher
at the University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography.
Autumn Oczkowski, a URI doctoral student, used stable isotopes of nitrogen
to demonstrate that 60 to 100 percent of the current fishery production is
supported by nutrients from fertilizer and sewage. Her research will be
reported in the Jan. 21 online edition of the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences.
"This is really a story about how people unintentionally impact
ecosystems," Oczkowski said.
Historically, the Nile would flood the delta every fall, irrigate nearby
agricultural land, and flow out to the Mediterranean, carrying with it
nutrients to support a large and productive fishery. Construction of the
dam stopped the flooding, and the fishery collapsed.
"That's when fertilizer consumption in the country skyrocketed,"
said Oczkowski. "The Egyptians were fertilizing the land, and then
fertilizing the sea with the run-off. It also corresponded with a
population boom and the expansion of the public water and sewer
systems."
As a result, landings of fish in coastal and offshore waters are more than
three times pre-dam levels. While increased fishing effort in recent years
may have played some role in the recovery, Oczkowski's findings indicate
that anthropogenic nutrient sources have now more than replaced the
fertility carried by the historical flooding. (University of Rhode Island)
Army Worms
Decimate Crops In Liberia - MONROVIA - Swarms of army worms have
attacked crops in a food-producing district of Liberia, forcing the West
African state to declare a state of emergency in the area at the weekend,
the Ministry of Agriculture said on Monday.
Army worms, which can grow to around 5 centimeters (two inches) in length,
are moth caterpillars and when present in large numbers can destroy
swathes of vegetation and crops. (Reuters)
EU Fails To
Approve GM Rapeseed, Carnation Imports - BRUSSELS - EU ministers
failed to reach a majority on Monday to approve applications for importing
a genetically modified rapeseed and carnation flower, paving the way for a
default approval by the EU executive, officials said.
The rapeseed, developed by Germany's Bayer CropScience to resist certain
glufosinate-ammonium herbicides and known by its codename T25, was
discontinued from commercial planting after the 2005 season.
Only a small stock of the rapeseed remains, in Canada, and could be
exported to EU markets if approval is granted.
Bayer's application for EU approval is for use in food and feed, not for
cultivation in Europe's fields. It will now return to the European
Commission, the EU's executive arm, most probably for a default approval
in the coming weeks. (Reuters)
Chemists engineer
plants to produce new compounds -- In work that could expand the
frontiers of genetic engineering, MIT chemists have, for the first time,
genetically altered a plant to produce entirely new compounds, some of
which could be used as drugs against cancer and other diseases.
The researchers, led by Sarah O'Connor of the Department of Chemistry,
produced the new compounds by manipulating the complex biosynthetic
pathways of the periwinkle plant. This sort of manipulation, which
O'Connor and her graduate student, Weerawat Runguphan, report in the Jan.
18 issue of Nature Chemical Biology, offers a new way to tweak potential
drugs to make them less toxic (and/or more effective). (PhysOrg.com)
January 19, 2009
I lost the bet: Geese
Pose Big Risk at Airports in Region - For years, airport officials
have removed shrubs and trees that attract birds. They have tried to scare
them away with music, pyrotechnics and cannons. They have even raided
birds’ nests and culled the adults with shotguns.
Still, birds, often geese, sometimes end up in plane engines, causing
inconvenience, or worse: They are a leading suspect in the nearly
disastrous ditching of a US Airways jet on Thursday.
...
Nevertheless, the danger of bird strikes “is an ongoing problem, and it
will always be a problem,” said Steven D. Garber, a biologist who was a
consultant to the Port Authority in the 1990s.
And it may become more so — despite efforts at mitigation. “There is
evidence both in North America and in Europe that birds are shifting their
territories,” said Joel L. Cracraft, curator in charge of the department
of ornithology at the American Museum of Natural History. “And that
has been correlated with global warming.” (New York Times) [em
added]
On Thursday I was rash enough to claim even The Crone was
unlikely to be stupid enough to try to associate a plane ditching in the
frigid Hudson with gorebull warming... It isn't the first time I have
been accused of irrepressible optimism.
The
Flight 1549 blame game (updated) - It didn't take long for the
warmists to blame the US Airways crash on global warming, which is, after
all, deemed responsible for anything bad. Time Magazine, which was once
widely read, sprang into action:
While officials use radar and radio collars to track bird populations,
habitat destruction and climate change have disrupted migratory patterns.
Moreover, the populations of certain species of birds are increasing at
rapid rates, thanks to changes in food supply. The Canada-goose
population, for example, has grown 7.3% annually from 1980 to 2006.
Rush Limbaugh may have been the first person to point out that greenies
have made the protection of birds (especially waterfowl) a major priority,
and an increase in bird population is a goal they have achieved -- that
may deserve blame for the crash, if anything is to be blamed other than an
Act of God. (Thomas Lifson, American Thinker)
Hmm... 27 years with an annual increase of 7.3% is almost a 7-fold
increase in the number of geese. Even the revised "The
Canada-goose population, for example, increased 4-fold from about 1
million birds in 1990 to 3.9 million in 2008, according to Richard
Dolbeer, one of the report's co-authors." indicates roughly a
6% annual increment in the number of geese. So either gorebull warming
is very good for wildlife (which would be true if gorebull warming
actually existed) or someone is deliberately encouraging an increase in
hazardous critters.
Jimmy's slipped right off his trolley: President
'has four years to save Earth' - US must take the lead to avert
eco-disaster
Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark
assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who
last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the
devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that
action will have to be taken within Obama's first administration, he
added. (Robin McKie, The Observer) | Read the full interview with James
Hansen here
The ultimate for ecochondriacs: Emission
Impossible? - 'Carbon Coach' Dave Hampton Helps Homeowners Fight
Global Warming
World-wide concern about global warming is hitting home as more and more
people try to make their houses and businesses eco-friendly and reduce
emissions of carbon dioxide.
With the European Union estimating that commercial and residential
buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU's total CO2 emissions,
governments around the continent have turned to homes to help achieve
Europe's goals of reducing 60% to 80% of CO2 emissions by 2050.
In the U.K., the government has adopted the Code for Sustainable Homes,
which aims at ensuring that all new homes built in the county be
"zero-carbon" by 2016. The Code assesses the sustainability of a
house on a six-point scale, with six being a "zero-carbon" home,
meaning its usage of energy from renewable sources offsets its carbon
emissions. The EU has yet to adopt specific regulations for low-carbon
housing.
For Dave Hampton, a Cambridge-educated engineer and self-described
"carbon coach," the new emphasis on emissions cuts represents a
business opportunity. After working on energy efficiency for over 20 years
for numerous firms, including British Gas, engineering consultants WS
Atkins, Building Research Establishment and ABS Consulting, Mr. Hampton
set himself up in business as a consultant who specializes in helping
individuals reduce their carbon footprint. "My aim is to show people
they can halve their carbon shadow just by making simple changes," he
says. (Wall Street Journal)
Green
Jobs: Fact or Fiction? - An Assessment of the Literature
Introduction and Executive Summary
I. Green Recovery, Center for American Progress
II. Job Opportunities for the Green Economy, Political Economy Research
Institute
III. Current and Potential Green Jobs in the U.S. Economy, Global Insight
IV. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, American Solar Energy Society
(Robert Michaels and Robert P. Murphy, Institute for Energy Research)
Does Nature’s Thermostat
Exist? A Global Warming Debate Challenge - Scientific disagreements
over just how much mankind’s carbon dioxide emissions will warm the
planet can be described with the analogy of the thermostat in your home.
You set the thermostat to a certain temperature, and if it senses (for
example) that the temperature is rising too much above that preset level,
a cooling mechanism (air conditioning) kicks in and works to push the
temperature back down.
I, and a number of other scientists, believe that nature has a
thermostatic control mechanism that “pushes back” against a warming
influence, such as the relatively weak warming from more atmospheric
carbon dioxide. (The direct warming effect of more CO2 would amount to
little more than 1 deg. F by late in this century, and is generally not
the subject of debate.)
In climate research (and engineering, and physics) a thermostatic control
mechanism is called ‘negative feedback’, and as discussed elsewhere on
my web site there are a number of studies that suggest it really does
exist in the climate system. At this point my own research suggests that
the natural cooling mechanism is most likely due to the response of clouds
to warming. While it is a bit technical, the issue is introduced in this
peer-reviewed publication. (Roy W. Spencer)
Hmm... Clearer
skies over Europe as fog halved in 30 years - Scientists discover
'massive decline' in fog, mist and haze as air quality improves, but it
may accelerate global warming
Europe has become less foggy over the past three decades, according to
scientists who have examined weather records across the continent. Fog,
mist and haze have become less frequent and have contributed, they
calculate, to between 10% and 20% of the warming trend during that period.
The change is down to reduced air pollution, the scientists think.
Robert Vautard at the Atomic Energy Commission in Gif sur Yvette, France,
and colleagues, looked at the number of "low-visibility" events,
where visibility fell to under 8km. They found a 50% drop since the 1970s,
which they call a "massive decline". (David Adam, The Guardian)
Perhaps they are looking at a real-world example of the Svensmark
Effect. Remember that conversion of water vapor to droplets (clouds
and fog) has two effects: firstly it reduces the most prolific
greenhouse gas (and hence greenhouse effect) and secondly it increases
albedo (thus reducing net surface insolation). You get a lot of 'bang
for your buck' with fog and bright cloud temperature effects.
Interesting too, how all these researchers come up with their own
angles each amounting to 'only' 10-20% of guesstimated warming (a bit
for solar irradiance, some more for reduced sulfate emissions, here a
bit for reduced cloudiness, there a bit for land use change, add a dash
for soot and mix in urban heat island...). Seems to me we are running
kind of short of 10-20%s of estimated atmospheric warming to leave any
room for an effect from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide, no? Makes
it all the harder to understand how the antis manage to keep the carbon
con going, doesn't it?
Dumb beat up of the moment: Arctic
warming pattern 'highly unusual': Report - ... "The current rate
of human-influenced Arctic warming is comparable to peak natural rates
documented by reconstructions of past climates. However, some projections
of future human-induced change exceed documented natural
variability," the scientists conclude. (Randy Boswell, Canwest News
Service)
Wow! Some virtual-world fantasies exceed documented natural
variability. Scary...
Stop it Al! Americans
suffer record cold as temperatures plunge to -40C - Americans were
today shivering as bitter arctic winds caused temperatures to plunge to
record-breaking levels in many parts of the vast country.
There are even fears that crowds planning to watch Barack Obama’s
presidential inauguration next week could suffer hypothermia and frostbite
in sub-zero conditions.
This winter has been one of the toughest in decades with temperatures
today reaching as low as -38C in large areas of the Midwest and -40C in
the coldest place. (Daily Mail)
Blasted Gore-effect is really going to hurt someone at this rate.
Gore’s church losing
followers - In 1971, perhaps entertaining thoughts of entering the
full-time ministry, Al Gore, raised in and baptized into the Southern
Baptist Church, entered the Vanderbilt Divinity School.
His sojourn was relatively brief. In three semesters, he enrolled in eight
classes. He received an “F” as his grade in five of those classes. So,
having failed out of school, he entered the family business, which was
politics. But he apparently never lost his desire to enter a ministry, and
since he couldn’t make the grade in the conventional sense, he did the
next best thing. He started his own religion.
The result was the Church of Global Warming. With Gore as its high priest,
the church was not long in establishing tenets of faith, nor in
immediately branding those who refused to worship there as apostate.
The tragedy is that Gore, in his tenure in the family business, learned
well how to work the political system, and when he turned to evangelizing
for his new church, he was able to effectively use what he learned as a
politician to grant government sanction to that church, sanction that
would have been vehemently opposed had he attempted to grant government
sanction to the church in which he grew up. (Dan Sernoffsky, Lebanon Daily
News)
Prediction
of the May 2009 UAH MSU Global Temperature Result - There
are now 30 years of satellite data on global temperature. The graph below
shows the University of Alabama Huntsville Microwave Sounding Unit (UAH
MSU) results for the period 1978 to 2008.
See larger image here.
Examination of the record shows a change in character in 2001. Prior to
that year, global temperatures tended to rise in a narrow band for a
couple of years then have a relatively rapid fall. After 2001,
temperatures tended to peak in January and then have a much wider annual
range than previously. This is shown in the following graph:
See larger image here.
The above graph overlays the month to month results for the period 2002
to 2008, a total of seven years. The larger blue line is the average. For
the last seven years, global temperature has tended to fall 0.3 of a
degree between January and May, and then rise again to December.
Departures from this are caused by El Nino and La Nina events. Just as the
2007 El Nino added 0.2C to the January 2007 result, the 2008 La Nina
reduced temperatures in the first half of 2008 by 0.3C. The following
figure shows the strength of the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) which
drives the formation of El Nino and La Nina events.
See larger image here.
Another large La Nina formed in late 2008. The combination of the
annual pattern of temperature change and the current La Nina enables a
short term forecast of the UAH MSU result to be made. The combination of a
0.3c response to the current La Nina and the usual 0.3C decline from
January to May will result in a 0.6C decline to May 2009 to a result of
-0.4C (0.4C below the long term average). See PDF here.
Let’s see if David can do better than the UKMO has done in recent
years. UKMO is already talking a top 5 warmest 2009. (David Archibald,
Icecap)
Divergence
Between GISS and UAH since 1980 - Guest post by Steven Goddard
The GISS website shows the graph below, which indicates a steady, steep
warming trend over the last 30 years. The monthly average anomaly for 2008
(0.44) is 0.26 degrees warmer than the monthly average anomaly for 1980
(0.18.) (Watts Up With That?)
GISS
Divergence with satellite temperatures since the start of 2003 - By
Steve Goddard and Anthony Watts
Some of the excellent readers of the last piece we posted on WUWT gave me
an idea, which we are following up on here. The exercise here is to
compare GISS and satellite data (UAH and RSS) since the start of 2003, and
then propose one possible source of divergence between the GISS and
satellite data. The reason that the start of 2003 was chosen, is because
satellite data shows a rapid decline in temperatures starting then, and
GISS data does not. The only exception to the downward trend was an El
Nino at the start of 2007, which caused a short but steep spike.
Remembering back a couple of years, Dr. Hansen had in fact suggested that
El Nino might turn into a “Super El Nino” which would cause 2007 to be
the “hottest year ever.”
The last six years (2003-2008) show a steep temperature drop in the
satellite record, which is not present in the GISS data. Prior to 2003,
the three trends were all close enough to be considered reasonably
consistent, but over the last six years is when a large divergence has
become very apparent both visually and mathematically. (Watts Up With
That?)
Long-Range
Transport of Anthropogenically and Naturally Produced Particulate Matter
in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic: Current State of Knowledge by
Kallos et al. 2007 - There is a valuable research paper that documents
the important role of aerosols on weather and climate, with an emphasis on
their transport across long distances. The paper, by an outstanding
scientist at the University of Athens, is Kallos, G., M. Astitha, P.
Katsafados, and C. Spyrou, 2007: Long-Range Transport of Anthropogenically
and Naturally Produced Particulate Matter in the Mediterranean and North
Atlantic: Current State of Knowledge. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46,
1230–1251. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Debate
flares over how to cut greenhouse gases - Attacking climate change
through a complex greenhouse gas trading system is a centerpiece of the
incoming Obama administration’s energy policy.
But economists and energy analysts of all ideological stripes are saying a
better approach to getting a cleaner atmosphere might involve a political
dirty word — tax. (Houston Chronicle)
Imaginary effects of imaginary warming... Slight
changes in climate may trigger abrupt ecosystem responses - Some of
these responses, including insect outbreaks, wildfire, and forest dieback,
may adversely affect people as well as ecosystems and their plants and
animals.
The U.S. Geological Survey led a new assessment of the implications of a
warming world on "ecological thresholds" in North America. The
report, which was commissioned by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program
and authored by a team of federal and academic climate scientists, is
based on a synthesis of published scientific literature and addresses what
research and steps are needed to help mitigate resulting effects.
An ecological threshold is the point at which there is an abrupt change in
an ecosystem that produces large, persistent and potentially irreversible
changes. (USGS)
Report calls
aerosol research key to improving climate predictions - Scientists
need a more detailed understanding of how human-produced atmospheric
particles, called aerosols, affect climate in order to produce better
predictions of Earth's future climate, according to a NASA-led report
issued by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program on Friday.
"Atmospheric Aerosol Properties and Climate Impacts," is the
latest in a series of Climate Change Science Program reports that
addresses various aspects of the country's highest priority climate
research, observation and decision-support needs. The study's authors
include scientists from NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration and the Department of Energy.
"The influence of aerosols on climate is not yet adequately taken
into account in our computer predictions of climate," said Mian Chin,
report coordinating lead author from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in
Greenbelt, Md. "An improved representation of aerosols in climate
models is essential to more accurately predict the climate changes."
(NASA/GSFC)
Poor Freddy... Greenwash:
Tesco and its bizarre carbon accountancy - 'Carbon intensity' is the
new gambit for companies trying to spruce up their green images
How can Tesco increase its carbon dioxide emissions by almost 400,000
tonnes, as it did in 2007, and still claim to be "setting an
example" on climate change? Easy. By coming up with a bizarre test to
demonstrate its carbon virtue.
The latest corporate responsibility report from Britain's biggest retailer
admits to an 8.6% increase in its emissions in a single year, but says
that it increased its "floor space" by 14%, so actually its
carbon intensity "per square foot of net sales area" was down by
4.7%.
How does it get away with such a formulation? This is not, you will
notice, carbon emissions per tonne of groceries sold, or even emissions
per pound of our money handed over at the till. Just floor space. Why not
"per Bangladeshi sweatshop worker" or "per migrant
vegetable-picker working in Lincolnshire fields"? It would make about
as much sense. (Fred Pearce, The Guardian)
... actually expects a nonsense like 'carbon accounting' to make
sense. Bottom line, Freddy: the whole carbon freak show is a nonsense,
with no relevance to anything but misanthropy.
George’s
Aga Ga-Ga and the Heathrow Hoo-Haa - George Monbiot is a very confused
man. A few days ago, he announced his campaign against the Aga cooker
(because it uses lots of energy). This, he said ‘is indeed a class
war’ - the Aga is an expensive piece of kit, and therefore, you have to
be rather wealthy to own one. We thought he wasn’t entirely serious
about this campaign, it was just a rather childish attempt to prove to his
detractors at Spiked-Online that the Green movement wasn’t dominated by
the upper classes. He might just as well have shot himself in the foot to
prove that he wasn’t lame. (Climate Resistance)
Transcript available: Once
Again Climate Debate Skeptics Sway Undecided Voters in Leading Debate
Forum
NEW YORK, January 14, 2009— Intelligence Squared U.S., the Oxford style
debate series sponsored by The Rosenkranz Foundation, announced the
results of its first debate of the Spring 2009 season, "Major
reductions in carbon emissions are not worth the money." In a
dramatic shift, 25% of the undecided vote sided with the motion by the end
of the debate. In the final tally at the conclusion of the debate, a sold
out audience at Symphony Space, New York City voted 42% for the motion and
48% against. Ten percent remained undecided.
Prior to the debate, the audience at Symphony Space, New York City voted
16% for the motion and 49% against. 35% were undecided.
The results echoed a similar outcome on the proposition, "Global
warming is not a crisis," an Intelligence Squared US debate held on
March 14, 2007. The Global Warming debate produced an initial vote tally
of 29% for the motion and 57% against. At the conclusion of the debate,
the vote margins had reversed with 46% for the motion and 42% against.
The "Major reductions in carbon emissions are not worth the
money" debate will air on BBC World News March 7 and 8, 2009. The
debate can be heard on NPR beginning January 21, 2009.
Speaking for the motion were Peter Huber, author of The Bottomless Well,
Bjorn Lomborg, author of Cool It and The Skeptical Environmentalist, and
scientist and Emeritus Professor from the University of London, Philip
Stott.
L. Hunter Lovins, president of Natural Capitalism Solutions, Oliver
Tickell, author of Kyoto2 and Adam Werbach, global chief executive officer
at Saatchi & Saatchi S spoke against the motion.
John Donvan, correspondent for ABC News Nightline, moderated. (iq2)
Download
transcript (.pdf) The "Major reductions in carbon emissions are
not worth the money" debate will air on BBC World News March 7 and
8, 2009. The debate can be heard on NPR beginning January 21, 2009.
Mike Smith:
Global Warming Doom, Gloom Haven't Occurred - For more than 20 years,
we have been hearing doomsday predictions about global warming's effects
on Kansas and across the world. Locally, during the hot Kansas summer of
2006, forecasts were issued and media articles written tying that hot, dry
weather to global warming, and forecasting more extreme heat in the
future.
According to one scientist with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, global warming in 2006 was already "kicking the heat up a
notch."
But the weather has refused to cooperate with those forecasts.
More drought? The reality: 2007 and 2008 were the two wettest years in the
history of Wichita. No area of Kansas is experiencing drought at the
present time, in spite of all that hand-wringing just two years ago.
Extreme heat? The reality: The past two years, combined, had 21 fewer days
than average with 90-degree or higher temperatures. Since 1990, there has
been a downward trend in 100-degree or warmer temperatures in Wichita.
(Wichita Eagle)
Perhaps we should ban it: Revealed:
The cement that eats carbon dioxide - Cement, a vast source of
planet-warming carbon dioxide, could be transformed into a means of
stripping the greenhouse gas from the atmosphere, thanks to an innovation
from British engineers.
The new environmentally friendly formulation means the cement industry
could change from being a "significant emitter to a significant
absorber of CO2," says Nikolaos Vlasopoulos, chief scientist at
London-based Novacem, whose invention has garnered support and funding
from industry and environmentalists. (Alok Jha, The Guardian)
If this rotten product is going to steal the stuff of life from the
atmosphere, that precious resource, carbon dioxide, perhaps we should
impose international bans for the good of life everywhere.
New Ice Age
maps point to climate change patterns - New climate maps of the
Earth’s surface during the height of the last Ice Age support
predictions that northern Australia will become wetter and southern
Australia drier due to climate change.
An international consortium of scientists from 11 countries has produced
the maps, which appear in this week’s issue of Nature Geoscience.
Dr Timothy Barrows of the Research School of Earth Sciences at The
Australian National University was responsible for the Australian sector
of the reconstruction.
“During the last Ice Age – around 20,000 years ago – sea surface
temperature was as much as 10 degrees colder than present and icebergs
would have been regular visitors to the southern coastline of
Australia,” Dr Barrows said.
The temperature was estimated by measuring changes in abundance of tiny
plankton fossils preserved on the sea floor, together with chemical
analyses of the sediment itself.
“One of our major findings was that the continent’s mid latitudes
(Canberra, Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney) are very sensitive and
experience the greatest climate change in and out of Ice Ages. This is
where we should focus monitoring and look at past impacts of climate
change.
“In contrast, the tropical areas (north of Brisbane) change very little,
mostly less than 2 degrees.” (ANU)
Couple of points:
Firstly, yet again we see how ridiculous are claims of extreme
tropical warming potential when the change from ice age to current
interglacial involves a mere 2 kelvins change in the tropics -- the big
change in 'warming' is really 'less-colding' as tropical and temperate
zones expand polewards while ice ages involve frigid zones expanding
toward the equator. There simply is no huge equatorial warming
potential.
Secondly, note that the change from glacial to interglacial with its
net 6-9 kelvins temperature change was concurrent with atmospheric
carbon dioxide changes estimated as 200-280 ppmv. Under the IPCC's
global warming potential formula that is virtually identical forcing
(280-385 ppmv CO2 plus other gases, both pre and post
Industrial Revolution changes equating to an additional forcing of ~1.8
Wm-2) for less than one-tenth the warming (0.4-0.8 kelvins
since the Industrial Revolution). Even if atmospheric carbon
dioxide is responsible for the temperature changes it is obvious the
effect is almost exhausted and no great changes can be anticipated
regardless of how much carbon dioxide might be added in the future.
This carbon dioxide thing is such a stupid game.
Sadly demonstrating what moonbats the Tories have become: Powering
ahead: How the Tories have stolen a march on Labour with new energy policy
- The Tories' new energy policies leave Labour looking like the Luddites
they are – but there is still much to improve
You have to pinch yourself. Three years ago, when my book Heat was
published, critics lined up to tell me that the plans it contained were
"unfeasible", "unviable", "too expensive"
and "politically impossible". Now these ideas, none of which
were mine alone – such as a smart grid used to transmit information
between appliances and electricity suppliers, offshore energy parks
connected to the grid with high-voltage DC cables, universal grants for
insulation, a low-carbon heat grid – have become so mainstream that
they've been adopted as policy by the Conservative party. The theory of
energy provision has changed beyond recognition since 2006. The practice
is still stuck in the dark ages.
That the Conservatives, following the Liberal Democrats and the Greens,
can outflank Labour so easily on this issue shows how attached the
governing party has become to "sunk costs". By this I mean the
lobbying power of companies which have already made their investments and
want to squeeze every last drop out of them before they expire. (George
Monbiot, The Guardian)
What an interesting world it is when the UK Socialists are more in
touch with reality than are their Conservatives, who have been infected
with the putrefaction of greenery and are rapidly decaying into the
madness of ecotheism.
Government
accused of "blackmailing" firms over emissions trading scheme
- A number of the UK's leading firms have accused the government of
blackmailing them into accepting conditions within the forthcoming Carbon
Reduction Commitment (CRC) carbon trading scheme that will effectively
punish those firms that procure green energy.
A BusinessGreen.com investigation has learned that a number of the UK's
most high-profile firms, including Asda, BT, B&Q, the Co-operative
Group and Morrisons, are concerned about rules introduced as part of the
CRC that will ensure that much of the renewable energy they use will be
measured as having the same carbon footprint as electricity from the
national grid.
They argue that consequently firms that procure energy from many renewable
sources will not see the investment recognised through the carbon trading
scheme, which is to come into full effect from next year and affect about
5,000 firms. (Tom Young, BusinessGreen)
'Get
a grip, Geoff': Emma Thompson hits back at Hoon after he labels her
Heathrow protest hypocritical - Emma Thompson has hit back at
transport secretary Geoff Hoon today after he stuck the knife into the
hypocrisy of celebrities who campaigned against the third runway at
Heathrow.
The actress joined a motley crew of green activists in buying a patch of
land next to the proposed runway, which will see an entire village wiped
off the map.
But the straight-talking minister suggested that double Oscar-winner Miss
Thompson, who jets to America for her acting work, had to examine her own
behaviour. (Daily Mail)
"It's not against flying -- just a third runway in the face of
climate change..."
Dumb as it gets: Clearing
the air - Our addiction to cheap coal is under pressure as the climate
debate rages and business tries to profit from alternatives.
WHEN Sydneysiders flick on the power, there's every chance some of the
electricity has come from a couple of coal-guzzling power plants in the
Hunter Valley.
Eraring power station's 200-metre-high chimneys tower over Lake Macquarie,
while further west, the Bayswater station is set against beef and dairy
country near Muswellbrook.
Drawing on the region's vast coal fields, these state-government owned
giants share the title of biggest stations in the country, and supply
about half the power in NSW.
They also have the dubious distinction of being among the country's
biggest polluters, and are a hot spot for environmental protesters. After
entering service in the 1980s, their drab grey chimneys spew out more than
20 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year. That's equal to the emissions
of 4.6 million cars. A US study last year said they were among the world's
100 biggest polluters, in a survey of some 50,000 stations.
Amid the growing concerns over climate change, one might assume these
plants were fast becoming industrial relics from a bygone era. But just
last year the State Government approved an expansion of the Eraring plant
to shore up its dwindling power supply, further inflaming environmental
tensions. (Clancy Yeates, Sydney Morning Herald)
Carbon dioxide is not an atmospheric pollutant. It is an essential
trace gas and magnificent resource. Most of the surface life in this
planet is dependent on carbon dioxide's presence in the atmosphere.
Alleged Greens want to restrict that essential resource and throttle
life on Earth. So-called Greens are not life-friendly and they most
certainly are not people-friendly, so why do well-meaning people fall
for the misanthropists' propaganda?
Putin: Chevron's Man
of the Year? - I don’t know what the situation is in other areas,
but Chevron’s use-less-energy ads, launched last fall, are still thick
and heavy in the DC area. Its campaign, dubbed “Will You Join Us?”,
shows people promising to use their cars less and “unplug things
more.” (Sam Kazman, CEI)
Moscow
and Kiev strike fresh deal on gas - Russia and Ukraine on Sunday said
that a resumption of gas supplies to Europe was imminent after they agreed
the outline of a gas supply deal for this year.
The agreement, struck by Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, and
Yulia Tymoshenko, his Ukrainian counterpart, calls for both sides to
compromise on gas prices and transit tariffs, ending a bitter dispute that
has caused severe gas supply disruptions in Europe for 12 days.
The European Union gave the deal a wary reception, underscoring the damage
inflicted by the dispute on Russia’s reputation as an energy supplier
and Ukraine’s reliability as a transit route. (Financial Times)
CHAD:
Panic, outcry at government charcoal ban - N'DJAMENA, 16 January 2009
- A government ban on charcoal in the Chadian capital N’djamena has
created what one observer called “explosive” conditions as families
desperately seek the means to cook.
“As we speak women and children are on the outskirts of N’djamena
scavenging for dead branches, cow dung or the occasional scrap of
charcoal,” Merlin Totinon Nguébétan of the UN Human Settlements
Programme (HABITAT) in Chad, told IRIN from the capital. “People cannot
cook.”
“Women giving birth cannot even find a bit of charcoal to heat water for
washing,” Céline Narmadji, with the Association of Women for
Development in Chad, told IRIN.
Unions and other civil society groups say the government failed to prepare
the population or make alternative household fuels available when it
halted all transport of charcoal and cooking wood into the capital in
December in a move, officials said, to protect the environment.
Charcoal is the sole source of household fuel for about 99 percent of
Chadians, N’djamena residents told IRIN. (IRIN)
Coal’s
Newest Friend - Yesterday I commented with a slightly raised eyebrow
at comments made by Steven Chu, President-elect Obama’s choice to head
DOE, on the future of coal. Dr. Chu’s comments seemed to reflect a much
more conciliatory tone toward coal as a key part of America’s energy
future. Today’s raised eyebrow comes after reading some comments by
Henery Waxman, (D-CA), new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, as reported in the E&E ClimateWire: (Roger Pielke, Jr.,
Prometheus)
Crunching
the Data: The Ten Most Coal-Reliant Countries - It’s easy to malign
coal. And over the past few weeks, the news has been bad. A few days
before Christmas, at a power plant operated by the Tennessee Valley
Authority, a huge holding pond failed. The resulting spill flooded some
300 acres with coal ash contaminated with a variety of heavy metals
including arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese. On December 29,
James Hansen, the high-profile NASA scientist who is closely aligned with
former vice president Al Gore on the issue of global warming, sent an open
letter to President-elect Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, in which he
called coal-fired power plants “factories of death.”
While there’s no question that other sources of energy -- particularly
nuclear and natural gas -- can provide large amounts of electric power and
do so with far less carbon dioxide emissions and pollutants than coal, the
problem remains one of scale. (Renewables are fine, but they cannot
provide the baseload power and large quantities of power needed in the
near term.) But there are significant financial, political, and structural
constraints on those alternatives to coal. And those obstacles take us
back to a familiar question: If not coal, then what?
A bit of data crunching from the latest BP Statistical Review of World
Energy yields a list of the most coal-reliant countries. And that list
provides some hints as to why achieving a global carbon emissions
reduction plan will be so difficult. (Robert Bryce, Energy Tribune)
WWF
launches push to ban oil exploration in Norway's Arctic - The
Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) and other environmental organisations on
Saturday launched a campaign to ban oil exploration in the Lofoten
Islands, a picturesque archipelago in Norway's Arctic.
"This campaign is aimed at telling the Norwegian government that it
is not acceptable to open up this area to oil exploration," WWF
spokesman Clive Tesar told AFP.
Norway is the world's fifth-biggest oil exporter, but it has seen its
production decline since peaking in 2001 and no major discoveries have
been made in recent years. (AFP)
Video: The
2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport Edition (Iowahawk)
But
Who Will Drive Them? - The cornucopia of hybrid and electric vehicles
showcased at the North American International Auto Show this week suggests
that the nation’s automakers — domestic and transplanted — have
finally acknowledged the need to deliver the fuel-efficient cars and
trucks for a future of expensive gas and increasing environmental
pressures.
But a big obstacle remains to the greening of American drivers: the price
tag. With gas prices likely to remain low as consumers grapple with
recession, drivers are going to need extra motivation to swap their gas
gluttons for the novel, environmentally friendly cars and trucks. If the
incoming Obama administration is serious about its commitment to boost the
fuel efficiency of the American fleet, it must put in place a mix of
policies, beyond tightening fuel-economy standards for carmakers, to steer
drivers to the new cars. (New York Times)
On the other hand they could do something sensible and leave it
up to consumers to drive the market buy buying vehicles that suit the
consumers needs rather than watermelons' fantasies.
Wind
Farm Off Cape Cod Clears Hurdle - BOSTON — A federal agency said
Friday that the nation’s first offshore wind farm, proposed for the
waters off Cape Cod, posed no serious environmental threat, bringing it a
major step closer to fruition.
Homeowners and boaters on the cape, including Senator Edward M. Kennedy,
Democrat of Massachusetts, have fought the project for eight years, saying
it would hurt wildlife, fishing and tourism and spoil the beauty of
Nantucket Sound.
Opponents have sued to stop the project, known as Cape Wind, and more
challenges are certain, keeping the path to construction bumpy despite
what supporters on Friday called a crucial victory.
The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, a group formed to fight the
project, suggested that the Bush administration had unscrupulously rushed
to approve it before President-elect Barack Obama takes office next week.
“They wanted some kind of a legacy,” said Audra Parker, the group’s
executive director. “Cape Wind is far from a done deal, despite this
favorable report.” (New York Times)
Congratulations
to Winners of the 2008 Weblog Awards - BASED on 933,022 votes cast in
48 categories over seven days of voting winners of The 2008 Weblog Awards
have now been announced.
Veteran political blogger, columnist and author, Andrew Sullivan, won the
best blog beating the Huffington Post and others. Mr Sullivan’s blogs is
hosted by the Atlantic magazine.
Climate change sceptic, Anthony Watts, won best Science blog. Mr Watts,
and his team, focus on climate change issues and have a project auditing
US weather stations which makes for great visuals and amazing reading.
I would also like to particularly congratulate Lubos Motl for winning best
European blog and Tim Blair for winning best Australian blog. (Jennifer
Marohasy)
Congratulations
To Anthony Watts For His Well Deserved Recognition! - Anthony Watts
has won the best science weblog for 2008; see The 2008 Weblog Awards
Winners.
This is an appropriate and well deserved recognition of the importance of
Anthony’s weblog Watts Up With That, which is providing a much needed
discussion of climate science. We all should look forward to another year
of accomplishments and issues from this outstanding website! (Roger Pielke
Sr., Climate Science)
When
employers determine fitness — fireman fired for diet failure -
Remember the 280-pound fireman who was fired last summer because his
bosses said his weight made him “unfit” for duty? The world’s
strongest and fittest Olympic athletes proved that weight is no measure of
fitness, making it clear to the world what his firing was really about.
(Junkfood Science)
Government
health officials decide it’s acceptable to bully fat children - A
sickening development of the Department of Health’s Change4Life campaign
to eradicate obesity and create a "lifestyle revolution"
occurred this week. When public health officials learned that this
misguided campaign was, not surprisingly, resulting in children being
bullied, they decided that it was okay for the fat children to be
bullied... (Junkfood Science)
What
doctors are talking about with healthcare reform
If medicine becomes, as Nazi medicine did, the handmaiden of economics,
politics or any force other than one that promotes the good of the
patient, it loses its soul and becomes an instrument that justifies
oppression and the violation of human rights. — Dr. Edmund D.
Pelligrino, M.D., “The Nazi doctors and Nuremberg: Some moral lessons
revisited,” 1997.
When it comes to the future of our healthcare, having both eyes open is
especially critical. It’s easy to believe that the solutions to our
anxieties about medical care are simple. It’s even easier to miss the
profound unintended consequences for us when we look to solutions in the
wrong places. (Junkfood Science)
My
father's obesity made me into an anorexic: How a daughter's worry turned
into an eating disorder - Emma adored her father but his constant
gorging drove her to stop eating - and nearly killed her. (Daily Mail)
The
things you can perk up with a cup of coffee - 'Danger from just seven
cups of coffee a day," said the Daily Express on Wednesday. "Too
much coffee can make you hallucinate and sense dead people, say sleep
experts. The equivalent of just seven cups of instant coffee a day is
enough to trigger the weird responses." The story appeared in almost
every national newspaper.
This was weak observational data. That's just the start of our story, but
you should know exactly what the researchers did. They sent an email
inviting students to fill out an online survey, and 219 agreed. (Ben
Goldacre, The Guardian)
Players love the
game not the gore - The next time a loved one brandishes a virtual
shotgun in their favorite video game, take heart. That look of glee, says
a new study, likely stems from the healthy pleasure of mastering a
challenge rather than from a disturbing craving for carnage.
Research to be published online January 16 in the Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin shows that, contrary to popular belief, violence does
not make video games more enjoyable. The study by investigators at the
University of Rochester and Immersyve Inc., a player-experience research
firm, found that for many people, gore actually detracts from a game's
"fun factor," decreasing players' interest and desire to
purchase a game. When designing the next generation of video games, added
the authors, developers should remember: blood does not help the bottom
line. (University of Rochester)
The
Films Are Green, but Is Sundance? - PARK CITY, Utah — If it were
possible to cleanse the planet by watching a movie, this would be the
place to do it.
IStill, a stroll here this week down Main Street — where a dozen idling
trucks were unloading supplies and equipment, while an oversize band bus,
with trailer in tow, spewed fumes outside a soon-to-be-busy party site —
framed the obvious quandary: how can you cram some 46,000 people, roughly
equivalent to a fifth of Hollywood’s total work force, into a pretty
little mountain town without contributing mightily to the problems your
films hope to solve?
The airlift alone should give pause to the likes of Mr. Udall, or to the
makers of “No Impact Man,” a documentary about the effort by a New
Yorker, Colin Beavan, and his family to live for a year without making a
net environmental impact. (New York Times)
Torn
Between Green Galas? At Least They’re a Walk Apart - IN Washington
on Monday night, the giants of the environment and conservation movements
will gather to celebrate the inauguration, but they will do it at two very
different galas — with very different philosophies. (New York Times)
Passing
The Torch Of National Safety - George W. Bush's administration
achieved what few believed possible after 9/11 — a perfect record of
keeping America safe. Will President Obama keep the streak going? (IBD)
Obama’s
Green Team - We can expect a proliferation of new regulations that
will reach into every area of American life and commerce.
What do President-elect Barack Obama’s leadership picks tell us about
the kinds of energy and environmental policies we can expect in the next
four to eight years? On balance, they suggest we are in for a radical
shift away from George W. Bush’s pro-market policies and back to the
aggressive regulatory approach favored by the Clinton administration.
Let’s take a look at Obama’s prospective appointees. (Kenneth P.
Green, The American)
More
Than An Empty Suit? - CHURCHVILLE, VA—We elected a President we
hardly knew. Barack Obama’s campaign team—and the mainstream
press—told us only that we should feel “hopeful.”
Now we seem to be relying on this man to rebuild the U.S. economy almost
from scratch. That’s highly unlikely. My former boss, Gary Seevers, was
on Nixon’s Council of Economic Advisors, and before that a top official
in Nixon’s wage-and-price-control effort. He told me that “neither the
CEA nor government price-fixing ever had a chance to succeed. The economic
data was too late and too weak, and the tools too flimsy.” Seevers
ultimately put his faith in good incentives.
Obama himself was blind-sided by the sub-prime mortgage collapse, and his
response was that he’d save the economy with a replay of Franklin
Roosevelt’s New Deal public works projects. That meant he had no real
rescue ideas. After all, U.S. unemployment was nearly 25 percent when
Roosevelt was elected, and was still at 19 percent in 1938, after six
years of Roosevelt’s “pump-priming.” Many of the public works
weren’t badly needed, and they all took a long time to plan and pay out.
Not until World War II did America finally rise out of the Depression.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still guaranteeing high-risk mortgages for
poorly-qualified buyers, applauded by Barney Frank and the hard-left
Democrats. Investment does not mean buying a house the buyer can’t
afford. Investment means putting capital into your trucking firm or
computer service company and then buying the big house after the business
starts to earn income for you. Investment first, rewards second. (Dennis
T. Avery, CGFI)
Organic
food tied to Puna Rat Lungworm outbreak -- more cases reported -
Another case or Rat Lungworm disease has been diagnosed in the
Kapoho-Kalapana area of Puna and more unreported cases have been revealed.
The outbreak has been tied to organic farming. (Andrew Walden, Hawai`i
Free Press)
January 16, 2009
Browner:
Redder Than Obama Knows - Incoming White House energy-environment czar
Carol Browner was recently discovered to be a commissioner in Socialist
International. While that revelation has been ignored by the mainstream
media and blithely dismissed by her supporters, you may soon be paying the
cost of Browner’s political beliefs in your electricity bill. (Steven
Millioy, FoxNews.com)
Obama’s
anti-oil team - The president-elect is poised to hand environmental
policy to people who want to punish petroleum
The environmental lobby is positively rapturous over Barack Obama’s new
“Green Dream Team,” appointed to stomp out our carbon footprint. In
sharp contrast to the president-elect’s relatively moderate — if not
downright stale — picks for other cabinet posts, the green teamers are
widely regarded as unwavering in their devotion to more stringent
regulations and steeper taxes. To the extent they accomplish their goals,
Canada will suffer as America’s foremost petroleum supplier and leading
trading partner. (Diane Katz, Financial Post)
As part of our "looking at loonies" series: Dr.
John P. Holdren
John P. Holdren is Professor of Environmental Policy at the Kennedy School
of Government and in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at
Harvard University. He is the director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution Research Center and board chairman of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science. He will serve as the President’s science
adviser as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology.
The videos are from a conference at the Kennedy School of Government in
2007. The title of the lecture is “Global Climate Disruption: What Do We
Know, What Should We Do?” (By The Fault)
Jackson
indicates resolve to move forward on carbon emission rules -
President-elect Obama’s nominee to run the Environmental Protection
Agency, Lisa Jackson, said Wednesday that she would work alongside
Congress in developing a plan to regulate carbon dioxide emissions but
that the process of combating global climate change could start at EPA.
The issue of EPA regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases is a
sensitive topic on Capitol Hill. Members of both parties have expressed
nervousness at the prospect of being left out of a decision that will
affect such a large swath of the economy, particularly during a downturn.
The U.S. Supreme Court found in Massachusetts v. EPA that the agency did
have the power, under the Clean Air Act, to regulate carbon dioxide if it
so chooses. A decision that finds carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas
emissions to be a danger to the environment will “trigger the beginning
of regulation in this country on CO2,” Jackson told the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee at her confirmation hearing.
That effort will require “extraordinary communication” between the
administration and Congress on how to proceed, Jackson said.
Jackson said her initial priorities would be determined largely by court
cases, like Massachusetts v. EPA, that have directed EPA to act. Other
court rulings require action to cut sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and
mercury emissions from power plants. (The Hill)
Inclusive
Science - Because their specialized knowledge confers authority,
climate scientists should make every effort to be accurate and complete
when communicating to the public about the politically divisive issue of
climate change. Unfortunately, there are several points where Alexander
Bedritsky's thought-provoking article "Meteorology and the War on
Climate Change" (Summer 2008) fails to do this.
Bedritsky states that "human activities are altering the climate at
an increasingly alarming rate." However, according to data from the
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the rate
of planetary warming that was established in the mid-1970s has been
remarkably constant, varying only slightly from 0.17°C per decade.
(Patrick J. Michaels, Harvard International Review Fall 2008)
Go make money instead of looking for handouts ya lazy beggars! Companies
Lay Out Wishes For U.S. Carbon Law - WASHINGTON/NEW YORK - A group of
large U.S. companies, including the troubled Big Three automakers, on
Thursday offered Congress a blueprint for greenhouse gas regulation with
looser limits than President-elect Barack Obama has called for.
The U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a group of 26 big companies and
several environmental organizations, proposed reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by 80 percent from 2005 levels by 2050 through an economy-wide
cap-and-trade program.
"It will not be cheap and it will not be easy," said Jim Rogers,
chief executive of electricity supplier Duke Energy Corp, the
third-largest U.S. consumer of coal.
But Rogers and other CEOs from the group urged Congress to pass a new law
this year, saying delays will cost the battered economy more in the
long-term. (Reuters)
Sheesh! How did we decline to the point where captains of industry
have been replaced by the foot soldiers of Socialism? Once American
companies knew how it was done and that money was there for the making
but this lot seem to be infected with European socialism and simply want
to transfer wealth (from your pockets to theirs).
PIERS
AKERMAN: Cold comfort - THE rift between members of the federal
National Party and the federal Liberal Party over strategy to deal with
the Rudd Labor Government's global warming policy should not be allowed to
destroy the coalition's electoral hopes.
Senator Barnaby Joyce, who is openly derisive of the Ruddites embrace of
the theory of human-induced global warming, is an absolutist. With good
reason, he sees the government's planned emissions trading scheme as
socialism run wild, as a new tax, and as a protectionist mechanism offered
to those businesses who scramble to take up the offer of free emissions
permits now.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull, who opts for the "insurance''
approach to the theory of global warming advocated several years ago by
global publisher Rupert Murdoch, believes it is prudent to give the planet
"the benefit of the doubt''.
Nevertheless, he remains committed to the view that it is not smart for
Australia to lock in a design for an emissions
trading system now, when the new US administration of Barack Obama has yet
to be sworn in and before the major nations meet in Copenhagen to further
debate the issue. He also has an eye on the big businesses most affected,
mining and energy, which are agitating, as always, for some certainty -
and for a chance to grab free permits now and lock out possible future
competitors.
It's a pity big business doesn't have the same sympathy for the concerns
of the conservative side of politics. It is sheer lunacy for Australia,
which produces such a minuscule volume of so-called greenhouse gases to
consider introducing a regimen which has been universally acknowledged as
having absolutely no effect on even the theoretical effects of supposed
global warming.
It is just as insane for Australia to propose a universal model for an ETS
when it is a certainty that the incoming Obama administration, loaded as
it is with environmental activists who have proclaimed strong positions on
a cap-and-trade emissions scheme, will wish to play a lead role in the
global development of an ETS. (Geelong Advertiser)
Junk
Science on the Internet - A reporter just wrote me to ask for
reactions to this new “analysis” by the good folks at DeSmogBlog,
which reports that from 2007 to 2008 blog mentions of combinations of
“global warming” plus terms like “hoax” and “lie” and
“skeptic” have doubled, suggesting, according to DeSmogBlog,
a very significant upswing in online activity. This trend should be
troubling to US policymakers and campaigners wanting to implement new
greenhouse gas reduction strategies.
Here is my response:
I just searched “global warming” + pizza and came up with the
following:
2007 — 11,168
2008 — 24,907
Maybe there is a connection with secret Domino’s funding? ;-)
Social science this is not.
All the best,
Roger
There is indeed a lot of junk on the internet. Be careful out there.
(Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Record-breaking
years in autocorrelated series - As Rafa has pointed out, E. Zorita,
T. Stocker, and H. von Storch have a paper in Geophysical Research
Letters,
How unusual is the recent series of warm years? (full text, PDF; see also
abstract),
in which they claim that even if we consider temperature to be an
autocorrelated function of time with sensible parameters, there is only
0.1% probability that the 13 hottest years in the list of 127 years (since
1880) appear in the most recent 17 years, much like they do in reality
according to HadCRUT3/GISS stations.
If we add a non-autocorrelated noise, typical for local temperature data,
the temperature readings become more random and a similar clustering of
records becomes even less likely because the autocorrelation that keeps
the probability of clustered records from becoming insanely low is
suppressed. This matches the reality, too, because local weather records
usually don't have that many record-breakers in the recent two decades.
What percentage of civilized planets shoot An Inconvenient Truth?
But after detailed simulations, I am confident that the main statement of
their paper about the probability in the global context - 0.1% (that would
strongly indicate that the recent warm years are unlikely to be due to
chance) - is completely wrong. (The Reference Frame)
Hillary adopts W's climate policy? 'India
need to be part of climate change agreement' - WASHINGTON: The US
Secretary of State-designate, Hillary Clinton, has said countries
including India must be made part of any agreement on climate change and
announced that the Obama Administration would appoint a Climate Change
Envoy for the purpose.
"As we move toward Copenhagen and attempt to craft a climate change
agreement, all the major nations must be part of it. You know, China,
India, Russia, and others, they have to be part of whatever agreement we
put forth," Clinton said during the course of her nomination hearing
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday. (Economic Times)
Actually what she's saying is there will be no climate agreement
since India has already categorically refused to limit per capita
emissions below that of Western nations (i.e., a many-times GHG emission
increase).
Bush’s
Climate Negotiator Joins House Republicans -- Harlan Watson, President
George W. Bush’s chief negotiator on a global climate-change treaty,
will join the Republican staff of a House committee on energy independence
and global warming.
Watson, who works for the State Department, led the U.S. delegation’s
discussions in Poland last year on a successor treaty to the Kyoto
Protocol, which called for industrial nations to curb greenhouse-gas
emissions 5 percent from 1990 levels. The Bush administration opposed the
treaty because it didn’t include emissions limits for developing nations
such as China and India. (Bloomberg)
Interest
in global warming cooling off - It looks a lot like someone hit the
snooze button on North American action to address climate change. (Barbara
Yaffe, Vancouver Sun)
Back in Fantasia: Sun-Reflecting
Crops Could Ease Global Warming - LONDON - Farmers could help produce
cooler temperatures and limit global warming if they grow crop varieties
that reflect more sunlight into space, British researchers said on
Thursday.
Using a global climate model, they found this strategy could cool much of
Europe, North America and parts of North Asia by up to one degree Celsius
during the summer growing season, enough to make a difference in easing
heat waves and drought.
It would also translate into a 20 percent reduction in a predicted five
degree Celsius temperature rise for the region by the end of the century,
Andy Ridgwell and colleagues said in the journal Current Biology.
(Reuters)
By the way Andy, there is no "predicted five degree Celsius
temperature rise", that's merely an extreme scenario generated by a
computer model (the most extreme of the IPCC's infamous 'storylines').
Coalition
to lay out greenhouse-gas plan today - The most detailed proposal yet
by industry and environmentalists to reduce U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions
will call for raising the costs of new coal plants and rewarding nations
for protecting forests.
Rio Tinto Group, General Electric Co. and U.S. power producers will
present the plan today to a congressional committee and recommend
“urgent” action, according to a copy of the report by the 32-member
coalition obtained by Bloomberg News.
CO2
Emissions From IT Sector A Growing Concern - As global warming
concerns move beyond conventional targets such as aviation, heavy industry
and coal plants, the computing sector is falling under growing scrutiny
over total energy consumption and CO2 emissions from data centers.
Indeed, analysts say the information and communication technology (ICT)
now contributes 2 percent of global carbon emissions, and has grown to
rival aviation in its contribution to global warming.
"(The computing) industry has been profligate in electrical activity.
No one cared about CO2 over the last 10 years. Suddenly people care about
it, the availability of electricity is now a limiting factor," said
Simon Mingay, a chief analyst at Gartner Inc., during an interview with
Reuters.
Analysts project the ICT sector will grow its carbon emissions by 6
percent annually, twice the 3 percent growth seen in the aviation sector,
according to a 2008 International Air Transport Association (IATA) report.
The ICT sector growth is being driven by insatiable demand for computing
hardware, software and services. (redOrbit)
Shame
on you, Discover Magazine - Discover magazine’s January “The Year
In Science” issue contains an interview with Robert Proctor, a professor
or history at Stanford University. The Author is Michael Abrams.
Proctor’s new specialty is “agnotology,” a term he coined for “the
study of the politics of ignorance.” This is all well and fine - he has
a lot of raw material to work with since there is an abundance of
ignorance to be studied in this world.
In a previous incarnation Professor Proctor gained fame as the first
historian to testify against the tobacco industry. As a student of the
history of science, Proctor should know something about the relationship
between philosophy, logic and science. He should know something about the
logical fallacy commonly known as “hasty generalization.” But he
engages in an egregious example of this when he says:
“…in terms of sowing doubt, certainly global warming in a famous one.
You know, the global warming denialists who for years have managed to say
‘Well, the cause is not proven. We need more research.’ And what’s
interesting is that a lot of the people working on that were also the
people working on Big Tobacco.” (Climate Sanity)
Guest
Weblog By Madhav Khandekar - There is an article in Science [H/T to W.
F. Lenihan!] Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with
Unprecedented Seasonal Heat David. S. Battisti and Rosamond L. Naylor
Science 9 January 2009: 240-244.
The abstract of this article reads: “Higher growing season temperatures
can have dramatic impacts on agricultural productivity, farm incomes, and
food security. We used observational data and output from 23 global
climate models to show a high probability (>90%) that growing season
temperatures in the tropics and subtropics by the end of the 21st century
will exceed the most extreme seasonal temperatures recorded from 1900 to
2006. In temperate regions, the hottest seasons on record will represent
the future norm in many locations. We used historical examples to
illustrate the magnitude of damage to food systems caused by extreme
seasonal heat and show that these short-run events could become long-term
trends without sufficient investments in adaptation.”
An excellent weblog by Pat Michaels on this Science paper is also worth
reading (see).
Madhav Khandekar has e-mailed me on this article, and graciously accepted
my invitation to post as a guest weblog his insightful comments on this
paper. Dr. Khandekar is an Environmental Consultant (extreme weather
events) and worked for 25 years with Environment Canada in Meteorology.
His weblog follows. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Fish
poop helps balance ocean's acid levels - The ocean's delicate acid
balance may be getting help from an unexpected source, fish poop.
The increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere not only drives global
warming, but also raises the amount of CO2 dissolved in ocean water,
tending to make it more acid, potentially a threat to sea life.
Alkaline chemicals like calcium carbonate can help balance this acid.
Scientists had thought the main source for this balancing chemical was the
shells of marine plankton, but they were puzzled by the
higher-than-expected amounts of carbonate in the top levels of the water.
Now researchers led by Rod W. Wilson of the University of Exeter in
England report in the journal Science that marine fish contribute between
3 percent and 15 percent of total carbonate.
And the contribution may be even higher than that, say the researchers
from the U.S., Canada and England. (Associated Press)
Pick
a Number - Any Number - Worldwatch, which aims to ‘empower decision
makers to build an ecologically sustainable society that meets human
needs’ have upped the stakes:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - To avoid the most catastrophic effects of
climate change, world carbon emissions will have to drop to near zero by
2050…
The increase now being demanded by Worldwatch pretends to have a rational,
scientific basis… (Climate Resistance)
Depressed Carbon
Prices To Have Ripple Effects - LONDON - Tumbling prices for emissions
permits may have knock-on effects on the world's $120 billion carbon
market, including a slowing of U.N. offset supplies and a shake out in
green project developers.
Carbon offsets traded under the Kyoto Protocol and used by European
industry to meet carbon caps, representing a $32 billion market last year,
have not escaped the global economic downturn, more than halving 2-year
highs hit last summer.
That came on the back of weak energy prices, increased selling of credits
by cash-strapped firms and an anticipated drop in emissions from muted
European industrial production. (Reuters)
Given that they are worth exactly nothing...
Schwarzenegger's
bid to suspend environmental rules in budget talks irks longtime allies
- SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Like any head of state managing a severe budget
crisis, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has withstood criticism from all the
usual suspects — lawmakers from both parties, anti-tax groups, advocates
for the poor.
Now he's feeling heat from a group that has been among his staunchest
allies: environmentalists.
As Schwarzenegger and lawmakers struggle to contain a ballooning deficit,
he has insisted that any budget deal include a provision suspending state
environmental review for certain public works projects.
The governor said that would fast-track infrastructure projects and put
Californians back to work quickly. He said his proposal would accelerate
construction on 10 road projects around the state, noting at a recent news
conference: "It's about jobs, jobs, jobs."
His demand has been one of the main sticking points in budget negotiations
that so far have failed to produce a solution to the state's deficit,
despite three special legislative sessions. California's shortfall is
expected to reach nearly $42 billion by June 2010 unless lawmakers act to
close it.
Last week, Schwarzenegger vetoed a Democratic budget proposal, in part
because it lacked the environmental rollbacks he and many in the business
community desire. (Associated Press)
As if you hadn't been warned not to ever let this nonsense creep into
the books even when times are good and it can be viewed as a tolerable
waste cost. Don't do it because it is very hard to get rid of when
sacrificial surplus is not available. Misanthropic environmentalism is a
luxury good and must be expunged from the legislature.
Transport Can
Help Propel World To Greener Future - TOKYO - Shipping, airlines and
road transport need to clean up their emissions and help drive governments
toward policies to fight global warming, a top U.N. official said on
Thursday.
The transport sector accounts for more than 20 percent of mankind's carbon
dioxide emissions, and further growth is likely given rising demand for
cars, goods and travel in developing countries.
Transport will also be a key part of a broader U.N. climate pact about 190
nations will try to agree on at the end of the year during talks on a
successor to the Kyoto Protocol. (Reuters)
Paulson on Energy
Rationing - Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson took time out of
his busy schedule wasting 700 billion dollars of taxpayer money (and
thereby turning a credit crisis into a depression) to speak at Resources
for the Future on Monday afternoon on the subject of how markets can
address climate change and other environmental problems. (Myron Ebell, CEI)
Energy
Bubble, Anyone? - Henry Waxman Gives Public a Look at the
Corporate-Congressional Alliance that Threatens to Raise Energy Prices in
Pursuit of Private Profit
Washington, DC - Thursday’s first hearing of the U.S. House Energy and
Commerce Committee since Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) ousted Rep. John Dingell
(D-MI) as chairman is drawing criticism from the National Center for
Public Policy Research, which says the hearing illustrates how powerful
corporate interests are working with influential special interests and
with the liberal majority in Congress to use government to enhance private
profits at great cost to economic growth and liberty. (National Center)
Groups
sue BLM over oil and gas leases - ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - A coalition of
environmental groups is suing the Bureau of Land Management.
They claim the agency violated several federal laws and policies in
granting oil and gas leases on more than 68,000 acres of public land in
New Mexico.
The lawsuit was filed today in federal court by the Western Environmental
Law Center, which filed a similar lawsuit in Montana last month.
(Associated Press)
Coal
Industry Digs Itself Out of a Hole in the Capitol - Support From EPA,
Energy Nominees Signals Obama Team Headed Toward Center on Matter of
Fossil Fuels and Carbon Emissions
WASHINGTON -- Big Coal is on a roll in the nation's capital, winning early
rounds this week in what promises to be a long fight over fossil fuels and
climate change.
Despite a well-funded ad campaign by environmentalists attacking the
industry, and a huge coal-ash spill in Tennessee that has led to calls for
more regulation, the industry has received positive assurances this week
from President-elect Barack Obama's nominees that the new administration
is committed to keeping coal a big part of the nation's energy source.
On Wednesday, Mr. Obama's choice to lead the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Lisa Jackson, described coal to a Senate panel as "a vital
resource" for the country. A day earlier, Mr. Obama's nominee to run
the Energy Department, physicist Steven Chu, referred to coal as a
"great natural resource." Two years ago, he called the expansion
of coal-fired power plants his "worst nightmare." (Wall Street
Journal)
Eastern
Europe Faces Freezing Temperatures and Russian Gas Cut-Off - With
freezing temperatures across most of Europe, there was heated anger,
especially in Eastern Europe on Wednesday, about the suspension in natural
gas deliveries from Russia through Ukraine. The gas crisis comes at a
difficult time for leading politicians, especially in Bulgaria, where some
2,000 people demanded the government's resignation on Wednesday over
allegations of corruption.
The shortages of natural gas from Russia added to anger of protesters who
braved the cold in Bulgaria's capital, Sofia, to demand the resignation of
the country's Socialist-led government. (VOA)
Gas
Shutdown Shows Need for Europe Energy Cartel: Matthew Lynn -- It is a
freezing winter. Temperatures have dropped right across Europe. Even
Madrid’s Barajas Airport was plunged into chaos by snowfalls, the first
flakes the Spanish capital has had for four years.
In the midst of that, Russian energy company OAO Gazprom is playing
politics with the continent’s gas supplies.
For the past week, a dispute with Ukraine over the shipment of gas through
its pipelines has threatened energy shortages in Europe. The European
Union managed to negotiate a compromise that got the power flowing again
yesterday. Even so, Russia’s ability to turn the power on and off has
been demonstrated again. (Bloomberg)
Russia
divides Europe with gas crisis summit - Russia has called a gas crisis
summit that will cut out the European Union.
Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian President, has invited countries hit by the
Russia-Ukraine gas dispute to a meeting planned for Saturday. But he
conspicuously failed to mention the EU. (Daily Telegraph)
The
Nuclear Option: European Gas Dispute Gives Nukes Fresh Legs - Just
when it seemed the Russia-Ukraine natural-gas dispute was solved, tempers
flared again Wednesday. Europe is still the big loser, as Russian gas
still isn’t flowing across Ukraine and to the West. The big winner?
Nuclear power. (Keith Johnson, WSJ)
Germans
to invest £20bn in new UK nuclear plants - Germany's two largest
power companies joined forces yesterday and announced an ambitious plan to
build at least four nuclear reactors in the UK at an estimated cost of £20
billion. (The Times)
Michael
McCarthy: Gordon Brown doesn't get climate change - At a stroke Gordon
Brown destroys his environmental credibility and that of his Government.
His sanctioning of Heathrow's third runway with the huge leap in the UK's
greenhouse gas emissions that will be consequent upon it will be seen as
one of his premiership-defining decisions, on a par with his failure to
call an election in October 2007. It will come back to haunt him.
It is very likely that in pushing this through, Mr Brown has been strongly
influenced by his New Best Friend, the Business Secretary, Lord Mandelson,
whom he brought back into the Cabinet, and who is strongly aligned with
the business case for expanding Heathrow and the aviation sector as a
boost to Britain's future economic performance.
But the Prime Minister of course has a mind of his own, and he would not
have agreed to such a controversial measure if he did not at heart agree
with it himself. And what his decision now proves beyond doubt is what
many environmentalists and not a few politicians (including some of those
close to him) have long suspected – that Mr Brown does not really
"get" climate change, in the way that, for example, Tony Blair
clearly did. (The Independent)
Heathrow
gets third runway and sixth terminal in £9bn deal - The biggest
airport expansion for 60 years will be approved today when the Government
gives the go-ahead to a £9 billion third runway and sixth terminal at
Heathrow.
Ministers will attempt to appease environmental groups by pledging that
the extra runway capacity will be linked to tough new emissions standards
for aircraft. Only airlines that buy the most fuel-efficient aircraft will
be granted additional slots.
However, the aviation industry is already committed to introducing more
efficient aircraft and the runway is likely to be heavily used as soon as
it opens in 2019 or 2020. An extra 600 flights a day will pass over London
and tens of thousands of extra cars will add to congestion on roads near
the airport, including the M4 and M25. (The Times)
Biofuel carbon
footprint not as big as feared, research says - Publications ranging
from the journal Science to Time magazine have blasted biofuels for
significantly contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, calling into
question the environmental benefits of making fuel from plant material.
But a new analysis by Michigan State University scientists says these dire
predictions are based on a set of assumptions that may not be correct.
(Michigan State University)
Scientists
find clean method of making fuel from manure - A university professor
and a corporate research group have jointly developed technology to
produce hydrogen for use in fuel cells from cattle dung and urine for the
first time in the world.
The new technology used by Obihiro University of Agriculture and
Veterinary Medicine Prof. Junichi Takahashi and Sumitomo Corp.'s research
group also can be applied to human waste and allows the production of
hydrogen without producing unwanted carbon dioxide.
The research may pave the way for the eventual development of household
"toilet generators."
In the process, cattle dung and urine first need to be fermented under
oxygen-free conditions to extract ammonia, which is then electrolyzed into
hydrogen and nitrogen. The hydrogen is then fed into a fuel cell along
with oxygen, where the two react to produce electricity.
Takahashi and the group spent about 2 million yen to build an experimental
apparatus, which measures 2 meters by 1 meter, that produces hydrogen from
fermented animal waste. Using the device in conjunction with a fuel cell,
they successfully produced 0.2 watt of electricity from about 20 kilograms
of cattle waste. (Yomiuri Shimbun)
That's 1kW/100mt cattle waste... I'm not sure what the dry weight of
100 metric tons of cattle waste would be but I strongly suspect burning
it would yield something rather more than 1 kilowatt.
Unsettling
observation - Remember how that fictitious claim of an epidemic of
type 2 diabetes in children that had been published in Pediatrics, the
journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, went uncontested for years?
In fact, four years later, the journal has yet to issue a correction or
publish a letter pointing out the glaring methodological flaws in that
paper.
...
It’s hard to know what is most troubling: the fact these articles are
being published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, or that licensed
medical professionals caring for children haven’t noticed anything amiss
with the science. (Junkfood Science)
Children
are not ferrets and other fallacies of logic - If you are a ferret,
sticking your nose into a jar of Vicks VapoRub might make your nose run a
little and irritate your sinuses.
At least that’s what we can safely conclude from a recent study on 15
ferrets. The ferrets were anesthetized and intubated. Some Vicks VapoRub
had been put on the end of their endotracheal tube. Their mucociliary
function was measured and found to be decreased 35% over controls and the
mucous secretions increased 14% in the healthy ferrets and 8% in the ones
who had their tracheas artificially inflamed. The ointment did not lead to
any increase in lung congestion.
This study was conducted by pediatricians at Wake Forest University School
of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. It was published, not in a
veterinary journal, but in Chest, the journal of the American College of
Chest Physicians.
While few people have ferrets and children are not ferrets, why is this
study being mentioned at all? It has been used to support hundreds of news
stories this week scaring parents that VapoRub is dangerous and could hurt
their kids. (Yes, there was a press release.) At MSNBC, for instance,
readers don’t learn until eleven paragraphs into the story that “the
new study” behind the “warning issued for parents” was done on
ferrets. (Junkfood Science)
A
look to the future of obesity and wellness care in the news -
Transitions can be unsettling when we don’t know what to expect, but the
picture for public health is becoming clearer with the latest news.
Health and Human Services Secretary-Designate Tom Daschle spoke to the
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions last week,
outlining the public health priorities for the upcoming Administration.
Tim Foley at Healthcare Change Organization summarized his key goals for
reform: change the focus to preventive wellness; establish a national
health electronic database and interoperable health IT system; and fund a
National Health Services Corp to mobilize all healthcare professionals
(“all hands on deck”). Daschle ended his talk with a battle cry
calling to make wellness part of the culture in everything from education
to health, saying: “We need to make wellness cool, and prevention
hot.” (Junkfood Science)
Zealots
advancing on all fronts - The striking figure in Sandy’s analysis of
the Third Hand Smoking myth is that within a week half a million stories
appeared around the globe reporting as a scientific fact something that
had simply been invented, without any attempt at producing scientific
evidence: indeed, something that is contrary to the very laws of science.
In a cooling world, despite huge amounts of contrary evidence, the
imagined evils of carbon are propagated with ever increasing ferocity. The
crescendo in the suppression-of-alcohol campaign continues unabated and as
fast as junk statistics are debunked they are reinvented. The obesity
brigade is as ruthless as any of them in fabricating stories with no
scientific basis; frightening people into conformity. (Number Watch)
Sometimes NYT still gets it right: Where
Sweatshops Are a Dream - Before Barack Obama and his team act on their
talk about “labor standards,” I’d like to offer them a tour of the
vast garbage dump here in Phnom Penh.
This is a Dante-like vision of hell. It’s a mountain of festering
refuse, a half-hour hike across, emitting clouds of smoke from
subterranean fires.
The miasma of toxic stink leaves you gasping, breezes batter you with
filth, and even the rats look forlorn. Then the smoke parts and you come
across a child ambling barefoot, searching for old plastic cups that
recyclers will buy for five cents a pound. Many families actually live in
shacks on this smoking garbage.
Mr. Obama and the Democrats who favor labor standards in trade agreements
mean well, for they intend to fight back at oppressive sweatshops abroad.
But while it shocks Americans to hear it, the central challenge in the
poorest countries is not that sweatshops exploit too many people, but that
they don’t exploit enough.
Talk to these families in the dump, and a job in a sweatshop is a
cherished dream, an escalator out of poverty, the kind of gauzy if
probably unrealistic ambition that parents everywhere often have for their
children. (Nicholas D. Kristof, New York Times)
Zealots
advancing on all fronts - The striking figure in Sandy’s analysis of
the Third Hand Smoking myth is that within a week half a million stories
appeared around the globe reporting as a scientific fact something that
had simply been invented, without any attempt at producing scientific
evidence: indeed, something that is contrary to the very laws of science.
In a cooling world, despite huge amounts of contrary evidence, the
imagined evils of carbon are propagated with ever increasing ferocity. The
crescendo in the suppression-of-alcohol campaign continues unabated and as
fast as junk statistics are debunked they are reinvented. The obesity
brigade is as ruthless as any of them in fabricating stories with no
scientific basis; frightening people into conformity. (Number Watch)
Sometimes NYT still gets it right: Where
Sweatshops Are a Dream - Before Barack Obama and his team act on their
talk about “labor standards,” I’d like to offer them a tour of the
vast garbage dump here in Phnom Penh.
This is a Dante-like vision of hell. It’s a mountain of festering
refuse, a half-hour hike across, emitting clouds of smoke from
subterranean fires.
The miasma of toxic stink leaves you gasping, breezes batter you with
filth, and even the rats look forlorn. Then the smoke parts and you come
across a child ambling barefoot, searching for old plastic cups that
recyclers will buy for five cents a pound. Many families actually live in
shacks on this smoking garbage.
Mr. Obama and the Democrats who favor labor standards in trade agreements
mean well, for they intend to fight back at oppressive sweatshops abroad.
But while it shocks Americans to hear it, the central challenge in the
poorest countries is not that sweatshops exploit too many people, but that
they don’t exploit enough.
Talk to these families in the dump, and a job in a sweatshop is a
cherished dream, an escalator out of poverty, the kind of gauzy if
probably unrealistic ambition that parents everywhere often have for their
children. (Nicholas D. Kristof, New York Times)
USDA
unable to weed out unapproved modified foods - WASHINGTON - The U.S.
food supply is at risk of being invaded by unapproved imports of
genetically modified crops and livestock, a USDA internal audit report
released Wednesday said.
The report, released by the U.S. Agriculture Department's Office of
Inspector General, said the USDA does not have an import control policy to
regulate imported GMO animals.
Its policy for GMO crops, though adequate now, could become outdated as
other nations boost production of their own GMO crops, the report added.
(Reuters)
Free-range chickens
are more prone to disease - Chickens kept in litter-based housing
systems, including free-range chickens, are more prone to disease than
chickens kept in cages, according to a study published in BioMed Central's
open access journal Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. (BioMed Central)
January 15, 2009
All
In - It is a bit early in the year to staking out a position in the
race for boneheaded move of the year in the climate wars, but NASA GISS
has done just that but doubling down on its prediction that 2009 or 2010
will be the warmest on record. One might think that the surprising 2008
global temperatures (i.e., surprising to folks making short-term
predictions at least) would motivate some greater appreciation for
uncertainty. Not so. Here is what NASA
GISS says:
. . . in response to popular demand, we comment on the likelihood of a
near-term global temperature record. Specifically, the question has been
asked whether the relatively cool 2008 alters the expectation we expressed
in last year’s summary that a new global record was likely within the
next 2-3 years (now the next 1-2 years). . . Given our expectation of the
next El Niño beginning in 2009 or 2010, it still seems likely that a new
global temperature record will be set within the next 1-2 years, despite
the moderate negative effect of the reduced solar irradiance. (Roger
Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
New
fraud detection website (Niche Modeling)
Final
digit and the possibility of a cheating GISS - David Stockwell has
analyzed the frequency of the final digits in the temperature data by
NASA's GISS led by James Hansen, and he claims that the unequal
distribution of the individual digits strongly suggests that the data have
been modified by a human hand.
With Mathematica 7, such hypotheses take a few minutes to be tested. And
remarkably enough, I must confirm Stockwell's bold assertion although -
obviously - this kind of statistical evidence is never quite perfect and
the surprising results may always be due to "bad luck" or other
explanations mentioned at the end of this article.
Update: Steve McIntyre disagrees with David and myself and thinks that
there's nothing remarkable in the statistics. I confirm that if the
absolute values are included, if their central value is carefully
normalized, and the anomalies are distributed over just a couple of
multiples of 0.1 °C, there's roughly a 3% variation in the frequency of
different digits which is enough to explain the non-uniformities below.
However, one simply obtains a monotonically decreasing concentration of
different digits and I feel that they have a different fingerprint than
the NASA data below. But this might be too fine an analysis for such a
relatively small statistical ensemble.
This page shows the global temperature anomalies as collected by GISS. It
indicates that the year 2008 (J-D) was the coldest year in the 21st
century so far, even according to James Hansen et al., a fact you won't
hear from them. But we will look at some numerology instead. (The
Reference Frame)
Is
the GISS temperature index fraudulent? (Bishop Hill)
Distribution
analysis suggests GISS final temperature data is hand edited - or not
(Watts Up With That?)
Should RSS correct
their lower troposphere satellite data? - Dr Fred Singer’s, SEPP
Science Editorial (copied below) #1-09 (1/3/09) in “The Week That Was”
(TWTW), address’s the issue of the difference between University of
Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) [Christy and Norris, 2006] and Remote Sensing
Systems (RSS) (Mears and Wentz 2005) MSU lower troposphere (LT)
temperature data[1979-2007].
Dr Singer refers to the Heartland Institute publication which he edited,
“Nature Not Human Activity Rules the Climate”, where Fig’s 9a and 9b
seen below, indicate the effect of the hypothetical correction that is
required in the RSS data. (Warwick Hughes)
Critique of
Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) article in “The Age” newspaper,
Melbourne 6th October 2008, titled “Our hot, dry future” - My main
criticism of the article is that the BoM relies on Melbourne CBD rain data
to back up their regional conclusions regarding “climate change” and
drought, while the rainfall history is in fact affected by the growing
urban heat island. Melbourne Regional Office 86071 (MRO), a weather
station in Melbourne’s CBD is (a) excluded from their own High Quality
(HQ) dataset and (b) shows a negative trend of 90mm (a stunning 13% of
mean annual rain) over the last 153 years when compared to the nearest HQ
station, Yan Yean 35 km NNW. So much of what they say in “Our hot, dry
future”, is slanted by this amount, no wonder I am critical of much that
the BoM publishes. (Warwick Hughes)
Climate Debate Skeptics
Once Again Sway Undecided Vote in Leading Debate Forum
NEW YORK, NY -- 01/14/09 -- Intelligence Squared U.S., the Oxford style
debate series sponsored by The Rosenkranz Foundation, announced the
results of its first debate of the Spring 2009 season, "Major
reductions in carbon emissions are not worth the money." In a
dramatic shift, 25% of the undecided vote sided with the motion by the end
of the debate. In the final tally at the conclusion of the debate, a sold
out audience at Symphony Space, New York City, voted 42% for the motion
and 48% against. Ten percent remained undecided.
Prior to the debate, the audience at Symphony Space, New York City, voted
16% for the motion and 49% against. 35% were undecided.
The results echoed a similar outcome on the proposition, "Global
warming is not a crisis," an Intelligence Squared U.S. debate held on
March 14, 2007. The Global Warming debate produced an initial vote tally
of 29% for the motion and 57% against. At the conclusion of the debate,
the vote margins had reversed with 46% for the motion and 42% against.
The "Major reductions in carbon emissions are not worth the
money" debate will air on BBC World News March 7 and 8, 2009. The
debate can be heard on NPR beginning January 21, 2009.
Speaking for the motion were Peter Huber, author of "The Bottomless
Well," Bjorn Lomborg, author of "Cool It" and "The
Skeptical Environmentalist," and scientist and Emeritus Professor
from the University of London, Philip Stott.
L. Hunter Lovins, president of Natural Capitalism Solutions, Oliver
Tickell, author of "Kyoto2," and Adam Werbach, global chief
executive officer at Saatchi & Saatchi S, spoke against the motion.
John Donvan, correspondent for ABC News' "Nightline," moderated.
(Marketwire)
No CFLs in Sweden? Sweden
to ban mercury - Mercury is to be banned in Sweden starting June 1st,
environment minister Andreas Carlgren has announced.
The ban prohibits products containing the heavy metal from being brought
to market in Sweden.
“Mercury is now dead and buried,” Carlgren said.
The actual decision is set to be taken by the government when it meets on
Thursday.
In addition to a ban on products containing mercury, the prohibition also
means the substance can no longer be used in manufacturing or dentistry.
(The Local)
Letter of the moment: Global
government - I was in the room in The Hague in November 2000 when
then-French President Jacques Chirac hailed the Kyoto Protocol, or
"global warming" treaty, as "the first component of an
authentic global governance." Then-European Union Environment
Commissioner Margot Wallstrom seconded the sentiment when she told
London's Independent that Kyoto was "not about whether scientists
agree" but instead "about leveling the playing field for big
businesses worldwide."
In truth, and as Europe is proving, its rhetorical bluster
notwithstanding, no free society would do to itself what the Kyoto agenda
requires. Hence the increased claims that this issue "is too
important to be left to democracy." Once a group of our betters is
empowered to determine our energy - and therefore economic, sovereignty
and national security - concerns, this crowd get its way.
Kyoto, of course, was negotiated while Carol M. Browner led the
Environmental Protection Agency - and with her participation despite
unanimous Senate instruction against doing so. Her position with Socialist
International reminds us precisely why a radical like Mrs. Browner has had
a position created for her, so as to avoid disclosure and Senate scrutiny,
to lord over actual, Senate-confirmed Cabinet officials. Taxpayer
representatives should not approve funds for such a position unless and
until they receive an honest accounting of the agenda and its champions'
activities.
CHRIS HORNER
Senior fellow
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Washington (Washington Times)
Political
Climate - Incoming Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tells the Senate
that global warming "threatens our very existence" and she'll
shape a foreign policy to fight it. Pardon us, but remember Iran and the
nukes?
Clinton pledged during her confirmation hearing Tuesday that reaching
another deal like the 1997 Kyoto Accord would be one of her highest
priorities.
"America must be a leader in developing and implementing a global and
coordinated response to climate change," she told the Senate Foreign
Relations panel, even as conflict continues in Gaza, war rages in
Afghanistan and the nuclear clock ticks in Tehran.
She praised the incoming chairman, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., as
"among the very first in a growing chorus from both parties to
recognize that climate change is an unambiguous security threat."
"At the extreme it (climate change) threatens our very existence. But
well before that point, it could well incite new wars of an old kind over
basic resources — like food, water and arable land," she said.
But the real likely result of a warmer planet would be increased plant
life from more CO2 — the basis of all life on earth — and longer
growing seasons.
Ironically, it is environmentalists, with their passion for biofuels, who
insist on using food in our gas tanks, raising food prices, consuming
arable land, polluting our water through farm runoff and promoting world
hunger.
Even so, Kerry told her, "The resounding message from the recent
climate change conference in Poland was that the global community is
looking overwhelmingly to our leadership."
Clinton's sense of urgency on climate change wasn't so apparent during the
1990s, when she was arguably President Clinton's top adviser. Even with Al
Gore warning that Earth hung in the balance, Clinton never submitted the
original Kyoto pact for ratification by the Senate. (IBD)
Obama
to give extra push to climate talks: U.N. official - TOKYO - Barack
Obama will give fresh momentum to talks for a new global pact to fight
global warming, although countries still need to clear up issues such as
funding for developing nations, a top U.N. official said on Wednesday.
(Reuters)
And we believe he should give them a huge push... right off a cliff.
Obama's
green inaugural footprint - ... Not everyone's buying it, though.
"We've had the Christmas season, and it appears we're entering the
silly season with efforts by many to look as if they're saving the
environment when they're really not doing anything but engaging in
feel-good politics," said Brian Darling of the conservative Heritage
Foundation. "In reality, this whole inaugural is going to have a
massive carbon footprint."
Darling expects to see far more gas-guzzling SUVs than bikes as people
head to inaugural balls. (WGNO)
Diplomat:
Continuity, not change, will shape Obama's foreign policy - Brussels -
Europe should expect continuity, rather than change, from president-elect
Barack Obama on key foreign-policy issues such as Iran, the Middle East
and missile defence, the United States' outgoing ambassador to the
European Union said Tuesday. And on climate change, one of the most
crucial issues on this year's global agenda, Obama will likely echo his
predecessor's insistence that any deal should also include India, Brazil
and China, Ambassador Kristen Silverberg said. (DPA)
Japanese
Report Disputes Human Cause for Global Warming - Researchers debate
each other in new study; most disagree greenhouse gases are the cause.
(Michael Asher, Daily Tech)
Expert:
Seas to rise at varying rates under global warming - Sea levels will
rise at varying rates around the world because of a quirk of the earth's
gravity linked to global warming, according to a latest study by David
Vaughan of the British Antarctic Survey as quoted by media reports
Wednesday.
"Everyone thinks sea level rises the same around the world,"
David Vaughan, a leading glaciologist, said at the Rothera Base on the
Antarctic Peninsula. "But it doesn't".
Rises could vary by tens of centimetres from region to region if seas gain
by an average of one metre by 2100 as temperatures rise, he said. (Xinhua)
The
Ice Age Cometh: Experts Warn of Global Cooling - 'Lou Dobbs Tonight'
segment dismisses manmade global warming theory -- 'effects of greenhouse
gas have a small impact on climate change.' (Jeff Poor, Business &
Media Institute)
What a crime! Carbon
capture put to the test in NSW - NSW is about to find out whether it
will be able to capture greenhouse gas emissions from its coal-fired power
stations and store them underground.
Drilling began on Monday to see if the rock 800 metres under the Central
Coast can handle having thousands of tonnes of liquefied carbon dioxide
pumped into it each week.
It is yet to be proved that carbon capture and storage, in which carbon
dioxide fumes from power stations are compressed and cooled on-site before
being buried, will work on a large scale in Australia. Most environmental
groups and some in the coal industry think it will not become effective in
time to help slow climate change. (Sydney Morning Herald)
A huge waste of energy to deny the biosphere the stuff of life. How
stupid does it get?
Oh boy... The
Human Factor: Understanding the Sources of Rising Carbon Dioxide --
Every time we get into our car, turn the key and drive somewhere, we burn
gasoline, a fossil fuel derived from crude oil. The burning of the organic
materials in fossil fuels produces energy and releases carbon dioxide and
other compounds into Earth's atmosphere. Greenhouse gases such as carbon
dioxide trap heat in our atmosphere, warming it and disturbing Earth's
climate. (PhysOrg.com)
Green panic? Plant
life not a villain in methane emissions debate -- A comprehensive
investigation of plant emissions led by University of South Australia
molecular biologist Dr Ellen Nisbet has put pay to the assertion that
plants are producing and releasing large quantities of methane into the
environment. (PhysOrg.com)
What a bizarre write up. Does it matter whether it is the tropical
forests or the wetlands beneath them that create the methane
subsequently released to the atmosphere? Or whether plants are the
source or merely the agent transferring methane to atmosphere?
“At a time when people are so concerned about the environment
and the problem of global warming, any assertion that plants could be
responsible for an increase in methane was really alarming,” Dr Nesbit
said. Why? Overgrown weeds need to be protected from bad press to
avoid harm to their self esteem? Weird.
Nations that sow
food crops for biofuels may reap less than previously thought - Global
yields of most biofuels crops, including corn, rapeseed and wheat, have
been overestimated by 100 to 150 percent or more, suggesting many
countries need to reset their expectations of agricultural biofuels to a
more realistic level.
That's according to a study led by Matt Johnston and Tracey Holloway of
the University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental
Studies and Jon Foley of University of Minnesota, which drew on actual
agricultural data from nearly 240 countries to calculate the potential
yields of 20 different biofuels worldwide.
The analysis, publishing today (Jan. 13) in the open-access journal
Environmental Research Letters, indicates the biofuels production
potential in both developing and developed countries has often been
exaggerated. Why? Because current yield estimates, most of which are based
on data from the United States and Europe, don╒t account for local
differences in climate, soils, technology and other factors that influence
agricultural outputs. (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Wrong question, as always: Is
combating climate change worth the cost? - It's a topic that is likely
to come up more and more after President-elect Barack Obama moves into the
White House next week. Obama has said that preventing and reversing global
warming will be a top priority in his administration—a change from the
previous administration's stance that voluntary efforts would be
enough—likely through a mandatory cap-and-trade scheme.
Under that type of program, the government sets a cap or overall level for
pollution and polluters can trade licenses to pollute to keep within their
levels. But opponents of such a scheme note that such a move would
ultimately drive up energy costs, because power plant owners will pass
along to consumers the costs of staying within the mandatory limits.
So is preventing climate change worth that price, estimated by some to be
as much as 1 percent of global gross domestic product (GDP)? (David Biello,
SciAm)
While framing the question wrongly there is no hope of ever getting
the right answer. The actual question is: is it worth throwing any money
at all at the totally unachievable?
Now, before anyone starts on pie-in-the-sky claims about climate
sensitivity and our ability to influence climate this is all entirely
irrelevant. Why? Because we will never get any agreement over what
constitutes the "correct" climate even if we could change it.
There is no universally optimal climate, one which meets everyone's
preferences and requirements. Who gets to determine how much
precipitation falls where and when? Does the flood encouraging native
fish to breed trump the people's crops that will be damaged? How about
setting conditions encouraging one nation's crops but which hamper
another's? Who gets to pull the levers and twiddle the knobs on the
great climate control machine, even if we could build it?
Meteorologists:
Global Warming and Cold Weather Go Hand-In-Hand - The World
Meteorological Organization says cold weather does not mean that global
warming has abated. WMO says people should not confuse weather with
climate.
People in Europe are shivering, while people in North Asia and parts of
Australia are sweltering. Scientists say these weather extremes are to be
expected and neither phenomenon can be used as a case for or against
global warming.
Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization, Michel Jarraud,
says people should not confuse local weather variability with climate
change. (VOA)
Does this mean they'll stop interpreting every Summers day as a sign
of gorebull warming?
Can
El Nino Events Explain All of the Global Warming Since 1976? – Part 2
- Guest post by Bob Tisdale
INTRODUCTION
The first part of this post, Can
El Nino Events Explain All of the Global Warming Since 1976? – Part 1,
should be read prior to this the second part. Part 1 gives an overview of
the datasets used in the following, illustrates the processes that take
place during an El Nino event, and discusses the primary reasons for the
step changes in global SST anomalies that result from significant El Nino
events–those El Nino events that are not influenced by volcanic
eruptions.
In the following, the periods from January 1981 to December 1995 and from
January 1976 to December 1981 are examined. (Watts Up With That?)
How
did the El Chichón and Pinatubo volcanic eruptions affect global
temperature records? - The UAH Satellite Temperature Record With
Volcanic Noise Outliers Filtered Out
A guest post by Steven Goddard
I’ve often wondered what the UAH global temperature record would look
like if the cooling effects of the eruptions of El Chichón in April, 1982
and Mount Pinatubo in June, 1991 were removed. Large volcanic eruptions
shoot fine ash up to very high altitudes, which makes the upper atmosphere
less transparent, allowing less sunlight (SW radiation) to reach the lower
atmosphere. This has a noticeable cooling effect on the lower atmosphere
and the earth’s surface which can last for years, as can be seen in the
figures below. Note how the lower troposphere temperatures were depressed
during periods when the atmospheric transmission was also depressed.
(Watts Up With That?)
Obama's
energy pick endorses nukes, clean coal - WASHINGTON--Energy Secretary
nominee Steven Chu was greeted with warm approval from a congressional
committee during his confirmation hearing Tuesday, at which he
acknowledged the need to pursue nuclear and clean-coal energy but promoted
energy efficiency as the best means of addressing the nation's energy
challenges in the face of a dour economy.
"I feel very strongly what the American family does not want is to
pay an increasing fraction of their budget on energy costs," Chu said
before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. "That we do
the best we can on energy efficiency--that, in my mind, remains the lowest
hanging fruit."
Working toward producing more efficient cars and tightly sealed homes will
bring down energy consumption and costs, he said. (CNET News)
"Energy efficient cars and tightly sealed homes" means
respectively less-safe vehicles and poorly ventilated (read:
sickness-inducing) housing. It's already time to kick this twit and find
someone who cares more about people.
Parenthetically, here's the inevitable result of the EU's ecotheology:
Woman,
91, dies 'after becoming stressed over £16,000 council bill to make her
home eco-friendly' - A family have expressed their fury after the
death of their disabled 91-year-old mother who 'was forced to take out a
second mortgage to foot an unnecessary £16,000 council bill' .
The family of bed-ridden grandmother Dorothy Hacking blame Thanet Council
for 'disgusting treatment' after the pensioner became overstretched trying
to pay for work to meet government regulations to reduce CO2 emissions.
They say she was beset by stress and health problems after being left with
no option but to take out a second mortgage for the stone-cladding repairs
to make her home compliant with the Home Energy Conservation Act in
Ramsgate, Kent.
The law requires councils to reduce their CO2 emissions by almost a third
within the next decade. (Daily Mail)
Why Energy R&D
Spending by Government Cannot Succeed - Dr. Stephen Chu,
President-elect Barack Obama's selection to head the Department of Energy,
is a vocal proponent of wasting taxpayer money on research &
development for alternative energy. Dr. Chu prefers to think of state
r&d as an "investment," but "waste" is the
appropriate terminology. (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Canada
to talk about oil sands with Obama - TORONTO -- Canada's prime
minister said Tuesday that energy and the environmental impact of
Alberta's massive oil sands operations will be priorities when Barack
Obama visits Canada on his first foreign trip as U.S. president.
The timing of the trip has not been announced but Prime Minister Stephen
Harper told a Calgary radio station he's been in touch with members of
Obama's incoming government as the president-elect prepares to officially
take office Tuesday.
"We want to work together with the United States on environmental and
energy issues," Harper said.
"To be frank on the oil sands, we've got to do a better job
environmentally," Harper said. "At the same time, the
development of these things is pretty important, in our judgment, to North
American energy security." (Associated Press)
Hmm... Geothermal
Future - To most people the word “geothermal” means hot springs
and geysers — like parts of Iceland or Yellowstone National Park where
water is heated by the presence of magma near the surface of the earth.
But the earth’s heat lies below everywhere, and it offers a virtually
untapped energy reserve of enormous potential with a very short list of
drawbacks.
In 2006, a panel led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology surveyed
the prospects for electricity production from enhanced geothermal systems.
Its conclusions were conservative but very optimistic. The panel suggested
that with modest federal support, geothermal power could play a critical
role in America’s energy future, adding substantially to the nation’s
store of renewable energy and more than making up for coal-burning power
plants that would have to be retired.
Following up on the M.I.T. study and a separate survey of its own, the
Bureau of Land Management issued a decision last month that would open up
as many as 190 million acres to leases for geothermal exploration and
development. These lands are mostly in the West, where hot rock lies
closer to the surface than it generally does in the East. (New York Times)
While I tend to agree that geothermal power has promise I am
concerned abut the bizarre mindset of these guys. Grievous environmental
harm from coal burning? Give it a rest, the biosphere loves previously
sequestered carbon being returned to the atmosphere, something from
which the living environment profits enormously. If the living
environment were sentient it would want humans to burn all the coal we
can get our hands on.
'Clean
coal': Law could open door to new generation of coal-burning power plants
- As President-elect Barack Obama vows to curb pollution linked to global
climate change, Illinois is moving closer to building a new power plant
that could be a showcase for burning dirty-but-plentiful coal more
cleanly.
Under legislation Gov. Rod Blagojevich signed into law Monday, the state
will provide $18 million for studies that would lay the groundwork for the
plant, proposed for a site near Downstate Taylorville.
The plant, to be built by Tenaska Inc. and MDL Holding Co. about 25 miles
southeast of Springfield, would be the nation's first large-scale test of
technology that captures heat-trapping carbon dioxide. Half of its
emissions would either be injected deep underground or piped to oil fields
in the Gulf of Mexico. (Chicago Tribune)
Hilarious Tale of
Eco-Idiocy - To this list of eco-ironies, we can add New York
Representative Eric Massa’s failed fuel cell road trip. According to
Jason Chen at Gizmodo, Massa “tried to drive a fuel cell car from NY to
DC to make an environmental point and to show how great fuel cell cars
are.” (William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Peter
Foster: Detroit’s hybrid nightmare - Today’s alternative vehicles
are all profit graveyards or subsidy pits
The emphasis at the Detroit auto show previews this week has been on
“alternative” vehicles such as the third-generation Toyota Prius, the
almost-there Chevy Volt and other new gasoline-electric hybrids. In fact,
with gasoline prices having plummeted and U.S. (and Canadian) consumers
both cash-strapped and job-threatened, there could hardly be a worse time
to be offering vehicles that are both more expensive than, and technically
inferior to, gasoline-powered cars. But then we live in a wacky world in
which big auto bailouts are linked both to the climate change policy
juggernaut and continued reflexive calls for U.S. energy independence.
(Peter Foster, Financial Post)
The
Gas Hostages - The drama being played out by Russia and Ukraine has
been full of sudden reversals. Germans commentators argue that Europe must
take its energy security more seriously in order to avoid an encore
performance of this hostage drama. (Der Spiegel)
Europe
baffled by broken promises - The bitter gas dispute between Russia and
Ukraine descended into near-chaos yesterday, leaving European Union
diplomats baffled as promises to restart supplies fully were broken and
Moscow suggested that the US had meddled in the affair.
In a potentially alarming twist last night, Gazprom, the Russian gas
company, said it was unable to meet its legal commitments to supply
European countries with gas because Ukraine was allegedly blocking the
flow across its territory.
Russia and Ukraine both defied terms of a contract agreed last weekend
with the EU to allow an EU-backed monitoring mission to observe gas
transit, leaving people in 18 countries across the continent with supply
disruptions. (Financial Times)
Eastern
Europe Threatens to Reopen Nuclear Plants - Bulgaria, one of the
countries hardest hit by the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute, is threatening to
restart two nuclear reactors that were shut down over safety concerns two
year ago. Slovakia has threatened to do the same at its Bohunice power
plant if gas flows don’t resume soon.
The push by Bulgaria and Slovakia highlights the EU’s need to diversify
its gas supply routes. “Preparations … must begin immediately,” said
Bulgarian President Georgi Purvanov shortly after Russia cut supplies to
Europe. He was referring to reactors three and four of the Kozloduy power
plant. The closure of the reactors was a prerequisite to Bulgaria’s
entry into the EU.
Puranov recently said that under the treaty that allowed Bulgaria to join
the EU, his country has “the right to resume the operation of the two
reactors in a critical situation, and a more critical situation is hardly
possible,” he was quoted as saying by the semi-official Bulgarian News
Agency. “If the situation does not normalize,” he added referring to
Russian gas cuts, “I expect our European partners to show understanding
and not to object to such a move," Purvanov said. (Andres Cala,
Energy Tribune)
Russian
Security Plan Prompts Fears Over Future Energy Wars - The EU's
diplomatic efforts in the Russia-Ukraine crisis may have focused on
restoring the flow of gas but could it also have been trying to avoid a
more ominous escalation as predicted by a Russian security document?
(Deutsche Welle)
E.On Gets
Approval For Onshore Windfarm In Scotland - LONDON - E.ON,
headquartered in Germany, has won approval after four years to build its
biggest onshore wind farm in Camster in northern Scotland, which could
power up to 35,000 homes, the company said on Wednesday. (Reuters)
What
the news should have reported: No link between fat and risks for ovarian
cancer - Science by press release is increasingly becoming the news of
the day. A press release is sent out six weeks before a study is actually
published in a medical journal, guaranteeing reporters will jump on a
juicy story, but medical professionals won’t have had an opportunity to
read it or comment with critical analyses.
When we see this marketing tactic employed, it’s our heads up — our
baloney alert, if you will — that the science wasn’t credible in the
first place. Someone is trying to sell us something and compromise the
integrity of medical research and the peer review process.
An unpardonable example of brazen misrepresentation of a medical
“study” came out this past week when the media, in lockstep, reported
from a press release. This press release had been issued six weeks before
the study is to be published on February 15th in Cancer, the journal of
the American Cancer Society. It headlined: “Study links obesity to
elevated risk of ovarian cancer.” (Junkfood Science)
Getting
the Bed Bugs Out - Complaints about bed bugs in New York City are
rising steadily. As any health official can attest, the only good thing
about these nighttime pests is that they don’t seem to cause disease.
That doesn’t count panic attacks and the outsize frustration for
residents who try to get help from a maze of local and state
bureaucracies.
There are a lot of agencies that do a little about bed bugs, but nobody
that can help with the whole shebang. The city health department has some
information. The housing people can come take a look. The state controls
the pesticides, although not well enough to advise homeowners what works
and who exterminates carefully.
Gale Brewer, a member of City Council, has been trying for years to get
help for any family under attack. After sleepless nights and days spent
covered in calamine lotion, these exhausted people need a one-stop link or
telephone line to guide them, she rightly argues. (New York Times)
Agency
can't link Great Lakes pollution, illness - TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. —
Wrapping up an eight-year investigation of possible links between
industrial pollution and health risks in the Great Lakes region, federal
researchers said information was too sketchy and called for more study.
(Associated Press)
Recycling
a 'waste of time' unless more treatment centres are built - PEOPLE
recycling their waste could be doing so in vain because it could still end
up in landfill sites, a new report warns today.
The National Audit Office accused the Government of failing to build
enough large-scale recycling centres or incinerators to meet a 2013 EU
target to cut the amount put in landfill sites. (Evening Standard)
The
International Criminal Court's Dream of Global Justice - The
International Criminal Court in The Hague is supposed to bring war
criminals to justice, but it has yet to deliver a single verdict. Can
international law bring peace to war-torn regions -- or does it actually
hinder the peace process? (Der Spiegel)
Ha! Obama's
EPA Pick Must Restore Integrity: Senators - WASHINGTON - Lisa Jackson,
President-elect Barack Obama's choice to head the Environmental Protection
Agency, needs to restore integrity to a department that fallen into
disrepute, Democratic senators said on Wednesday. (Retuers)
Only way to make the EPA any real value is eliminate it completely
with legal barriers to ensure such misanthropic nonsense never again
contaminates human affairs.
The End of Natural History,
Tears for Its Passing - Someday natural history will start again and
the people then will see the T-Rex and the so smooth mammoth tusk and the
wonderful minerals again. They will shake their heads and ask, “What was
wrong with those people back then?” “They forgot to look up at the
stars in wonder and they forgot to teach their children the joy that is
this planet. They stole the gift of imagination from them with boring
words on plaques and a big wire antenna to stop them from thinking inside
this great glass and steel post office.”
How sad. It is enough to make you cry. (shootyoureyeout.net)
Extinct Tasmanian
"Tiger" DNA Has Clues To Demise - WASHINGTON - DNA taken
from the hair of two extinct Tasmanian "tigers" suggests the
Australian marsupials last seen 70 years ago may have become too inbred to
survive as a species, researchers reported on Monday.
The researchers used the method they used to study the DNA from extinct
woolly mammoths' hair to get a good comparison of the gene sequences from
Tasmanian tigers, formally known as thylacines, and said they hope to
study other extinct animals -- and perhaps resurrect one or two of them.
(Reuters)
'What
are we going to do about the bears?' - For the first time,
governments, environmentalists, researchers and Inuit are meeting to
discuss the fate of the endangered carnivore. (Globe and Mail)
Who says they are endangered?
Alaska Seeks To
Block U.S. Protections For Belugas - ANCHORAGE - Five months after
suing to keep polar bears off the U.S. threatened species list, Alaska's
government said Wednesday it plans to issue a similar challenge to block
federal protections for a struggling population of beluga whales in Cook
Inlet, a mature oil-producing basin.
Former vice presidential hopeful Gov. Sarah Palin said the energy-rich
state believes the Endangered Species Act protections for belugas
announced in October by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration are unwarranted.
"The State of Alaska has worked cooperatively with the federal
government to protect and conserve beluga whales in Cook Inlet," the
Republican governor said in a news release announcing that a 60-day notice
of intent to sue had been sent to NOAA. "This listing decision didn't
take those efforts into account as required by law." (Reuters)
January 14, 2009
Obama's Pick for
Science Adviser Is Unfit To Serve - John Holdren’s 40-year record of
outlandish scientific assertions, consistently wrong predictions, and
dangerous public policy choices makes him unfit to serve as White House
Science Adviser. The Senate should not confirm his nomination. (William
Yeatman, CEI)
Something about 'leopards and spots' comes to mind: Chu
Tempers Comments at Confirmation Hearing - President-elect Barrack
Obama's nominee for Energy secretary, Steven Chu, walked a fine line today
between his strong views on the need to combat climate change and the
concern of some senators about Chu's past criticism of coal use,
endorsement of gasoline taxes and tepid embrace of a cap-and-trade system
for limiting greenhouse gas emissions.
Chu, who appeared before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, was asked about a comment he once made that "coal is my
worst nightmare." Chu told the committee that "if the world
continues to use coal the way it is using it today, not only in the United
States but in Russia, India and China, it is a pretty bad dream." But
he added that he does not favor a moratorium on coal and said he would
seek and fund research on technologies so that the United States could
continue to tap its abundant coal reserves.
Although Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist who heads the Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, once called for sharply raising gasoline
taxes, today he echoed Obama's comments that given the troubled economy,
higher gasoline taxes are for now "off the table." But he also
said that higher taxes could lead to lower prices for crude oil by
creating incentives for more efficient vehicles and reducing demand for
petroleum products. (Washington Post)
Energy
Nominee Shifts His Stance - WASHINGTON — Physics met politics at the
confirmation hearing Tuesday for Steven Chu, the Nobel laureate scientist
chosen by President-elect Barack Obama to head the Department of Energy,
and the physics bent a bit, as Dr. Chu backed away slightly from earlier
statements he has made — that gasoline prices should be higher, and that
coal was his “nightmare.” (New York Times)
Precisely what the world does not need: Treasury
Department Can Help Fight Global Warming, Says Paulson – The U.S.
Treasury and other finance ministries around the world should play a major
role in fixing climate change, outgoing Bush administration Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson said Monday at an event sponsored by the
environmental group Resources For the Future. The discussion was titled,
"How Markets Can Help Address Climate Change and Other Major
Environmental Problems."
Paulson, who once served as chairman of the Nature Conservancy and
co-chair of the environmental group Asia-Pacific Council, has long been
involved in fighting global warming.
“I will be actually surprised and disappointed if the Office of Treasury
isn’t a leader -- probably the leader -- in the government in terms of
having more resources and knowledge than any other place,” said Paulson,
referring to research on alternative energy and climate change. (CNSNews.com)
Crunch
year for environmental policies - As the world's attention continues
to focus on the economy, 2009 will be a critical year for environmental
politics. The crucial Copenhagen summit in December is now imminent and
the key question is what international response there will be to the
pressure to negotiate a binding and effective post-Kyoto treaty. The
outcome of last month's Poznan conference was a bare minimum commitment to
a deal in Copenhagen, hedged with ifs and buts. Nevertheless, the great
majority of mainstream environmentalist organisations are pinning their
hopes on progress this year and investing enormous amounts of time and
effort to achieve what they consider to be a successful outcome.
Not least among the factors which will determine the situation in a year's
time is the stance taken by President Obama. In the Kafkaesque world of
climate policy, the USA has been the bad guy for not ratifying the Kyoto
protocol (although by many measures the country has been rather more
successful in limiting emissions than many ardent Kyoto supporters in the
EU and elsewhere) and President Bush the arch-villain (despite the refusal
to ratify occurring under the Clinton/Gore administration). Obama was
elected with a promise of change to come, but his appointments so far have
been generally soundly pragmatic rather than radical.
He has appointed cabinet members with impeccably green credentials to
advise on environmental issues, and been applauded by the climate change
lobby for that. But this does not mean that America will suddenly become a
leader in international initiatives. Obama has shown himself capable of
picking a team of well-regarded experts without simply following the
doctrinaire line which some of his supporters may have wished for.
Ensuring the support of the green lobby at this early stage was simply
good politics and, although he will be careful not to sideline his
advisers, his way ahead is likely to be quite cautious. (Scientific
Alliance)
Barack
Obama’s Polluted Mind - How far do politicians believe they can push
the global-warming scam? We know, after his inauguration, Barack Obama
intends to officially classify carbon dioxide as a "dangerous
pollutant." After such a declaration, his actions will reveal whether
he truly views carbon dioxide as a threat to humanity or whether he is
simply using a shameless scare tactic to further consolidate Federal power
and to move the U.S. further along the road to socialism. If carbon
dioxide is incredibly dangerous as Al Gore and Barack Obama claim it to
be, then all options, for reducing carbon dioxide emissions, must be
considered.
Once President Obama declares carbon dioxide to be a dangerous pollutant,
every single American brewery, winery, and distillery will be, by
definition, a "dangerous polluter." Thus, if manmade carbon
dioxide output must be drastically reduced to save the planet and humanity
itself, then President Obama must strongly consider reinstating alcohol
prohibition in these United States. Al Gore, to date, hasn’t had the
guts to push the global-warming scam to the point of suggesting global
alcohol prohibition and I highly doubt President Obama has the guts to do
so in the U.S. Both of these political hacks, after all, are socialists
and certainly are not in love with Mother Earth and humanity, but with
power and celebrity. (Eric Englund, LewRockwell.com)
Senate
Republicans Need to Demand Re-Examination on Global Warming - On the
question of global warming control, the confirmation hearings for
President-Elect Obama's choices for environmental leadership posts present
a critical juncture for the future of America and the world. While running
for election, Barack Obama repeatedly declared our planet to be in peril
from global warming, which he presumably has come to believe is
significantly caused by human activity. That augurs for extensive
regulation, the expense of which can readily run into the trillion dollar
range. Yet many highly competent scientists would say that there is no
proof that human-caused CO2 emission is threatening the Earth, and there
is no benefit to the environment from limiting CO2 emission.
According to Reuters, President-Elect Barack Obama has asked Congress
"to act without delay" to pass legislation that includes
doubling alternative energy production in the next three years and
building a new electricity "smart grid." He said he also planned
to modernize 75 percent of federal buildings and improve energy efficiency
in 2 million homes to save consumers billions of dollars on energy bills.
(Harvey M. Sheldon, American Thinker)
Economy
will impact environment policies: economist - Don't expect the
American government of president-elect Barack Obama to spend a fortune
combatting climate change, an economist said Saturday at Guelph's annual
environmental symposium.
"The U.S. government's broke," University of Guelph economic
professor Ross McKitrick told an audience of almost 150 attendees at
Rozanski Hall.
"Don't look for any costly action in the next few years," said
McKitrick, a skeptic of man-made global warming.
Challenged by an audience member to say something positive about climate
change efforts, McKitrick referred to scientific evidence that some
greenhouse gas emissions haven't increased on a per-capita basis in Canada
since the 1970s.
"I take it as good news," McKitrick said.
But the professor added he couldn't comment favourably on international
efforts to fight global warming when economic times are tough.
"I can't put a positive spin on it." (Guelph Mercury)
New
Study Doesn’t Support Climate Models (But You’ll Never Hear About It)
- A new study just published in the January 2009 issue of Journal of
Climate uses a model to study the effect of warming oceans on the
extensive low-level stratocumulus cloud layers that cover substantial
parts of the global oceans. This study, entitled “Response of a
Subtropical Stratocumulus-Capped Mixed Layer to Climate and Aerosol
Changes”, by Peter Caldwell and Christopher Bretherton, is important
because it represents a test of climate models, all of which now cause low
level clouds to decrease with warming.
And since less low cloud cover means more sunlight reaching the surface,
the small amount of direct warming from extra CO2 in climate models gets
amplified – greatly amplified in some models. And the greater the
strength of this ‘positive cloud feedback’, the worse manmade global
warming and associated climate change will be.
But everyone agrees that clouds are complicated beasts…and it is not at
all clear to me that positive cloud feedback really exists in nature. (See
here and here for such evidence). (DrRoySpencer.com)
Observing
Weather and Climate from the Ground Up: A Nationwide Network of Networks
- Detailed weather observations on local and regional levels are essential
to a range of needs from forecasting tornadoes to making decisions that
affect energy security, public health and safety, transportation,
agriculture and all of our economic interests. As technological
capabilities have become increasingly affordable, businesses, state and
local governments, and individual weather enthusiasts have set up
observing systems throughout the United States. However, because there is
no national network tying many of these systems together, data collection
methods are inconsistent and public accessibility is limited. This book
identifies short-term and long-term goals for federal government sponsors
and other public and private partners in establishing a coordinated
nationwide "network of networks" of weather and climate
observations. (NAP)
Chasing thundersnow
could lead to more accurate forecasts -- The job of one University of
Missouri researcher could chill to the bone, but his research could make
weather predicting more accurate. Patrick Market, associate professor of
atmospheric science in the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural
Resources, is chasing storms in the dead of winter in order to release
weather balloons that will produce data about the little-known phenomenon
of thundersnow. (PhysOrg.com)
Hey lookit! When things were different they were, um, different: Great
Lakes water level sensitive to climate change - The water level in the
Great Lakes has varied by only about two meters during the last century,
helping them to play a vital role in the region's shipping, fishing,
recreation and power generation industries.
But new evidence by scientists from the University of Rhode Island and
colleagues in the U.S. and Canada, published last month in the journal
Eos, indicates that the water level in the lake system is highly sensitive
to climate changes.
"In the distant past, there were great fluctuations in the water
level of the Great Lakes, but it was thought to have been related entirely
to the advance and retreat of the glaciers," said URI geological
oceanographer John King, who led the study with URI visiting scientist
Michael Lewis, emeritus scientist with the Geological Survey of Canada.
"But the last time lake levels fell dramatically - down to 20 meters
below the basin overflow outlets - it was due to dry climate
conditions." (University of Rhode Island)
Now rising sea levels have been, ahem, 'saving us': Impact
of sea-level rise on atmospheric CO2 concentrations -- The rise in sea
level since the last ice age has prevented us from feeling the full impact
of man-made global warming. The sea level rise has resulted in more
harmful greenhouse gases being absorbed by the seas. So argue Bangor
University scientists in the latest issue of Geophysical Research Letters
(23/12/08), an influential US scientific journal publishing scientific
advances that are likely to have immediate influence on the research of
other investigators. (PhysOrg.com)
Stalagmites
support cosmoclimatology - In this weekly dose of the peer-reviewed
skeptical literature about the climate, we look at some new evidence for
cosmoclimatology. (The Reference Frame)
The Sky Is Falling?
- Imagine it is 1979 -- nine years before NASA’s James Hansen first
stoked fears of human-caused global warming in testimony before a Senate
committee chaired by then Sen. Al Gore. Few people in the mid- to
late-970s were thinking about the terrors of global warming; science
journals, major newspapers, and newsmagazines instead were focused on a
20-year cooling trend that some claimed was a possible harbinger of a
coming ice age.
The 1979 discussion is now relevant because the Earth’s current climate
is more similar to that time period than any decade since – even though
scientific “consensus” and computer models tell us otherwise. We hear
that human activities are causing the Earth to warm, the ice caps to melt,
and hurricanes to get more destructive. But everything the mainstream
media has been telling us about global warming for more than 10 years now
is turning out to be untrue. (H. Sterling Burnett, Environmental
Protection)
Barnaby
Joyce blasts greenie fanatics - NATIONALS firebrand Senator Barnaby
Joyce has launched a fresh attack on carbon emissions trading, drawing
parallels between environmentalists and Nazis.
Senator Joyce warned of the rise of "eco-totalitarianism" and
said he would not be "goosestepping" along with them. (AAP)
Is the
Internet becoming uncool for greenies? - A leading analyst believes
that the Internet is in danger of becoming a target for green groups and
anti-global warming organisations because of the massive power consumption
of data centres. Is it possible that the greenies may soon target the
Internet industry as environmental vandals?
According to Dr Steve Hodgkinson, research director at technology analyst
group Ovum, Internet data centres are increasing being labelled as
inefficient power hogs exacerbating global warming.
"Internet usage is growing and is now recognised as having a
measurable impact on global CO2 emissions," Dr Hodgkinson states ina
research note.
"Global Internet traffic is estimated to be growing at around
50–60% each year, with current users being the tip of the iceberg –
comprising only a quarter of the World’s population. There is a lot more
growth in user numbers and traffic volumes to come in the future, as new
users come online in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and South America.
(Stan Beer, IT Wire)
Arkansas
House members delay global warming hearing - LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -
Leaders of a joint energy panel agreed to delay until next week a hearing
featuring critics of the governor's Commission on Global Warming after
House members initially planned on skipping the Wednesday meeting.
The Joint Energy Committee rescheduled a hearing for next week featuring a
member of the Governor's Commission on Global Warming along with other
critics of the commission's recommendations. Richard Ford, an economics
professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, said Tuesday that
he doesn't believe the group properly studied whether global warming is a
threat.
Ford and other critics of the commission had planned on presenting a
"minority report" challenging the group's recommendations on
ways to reduce global warming in the state. (Pine Bluff Commercial)
Legislative
panel skeptical about global warming - Potential trouble for state's
greenhouse gas emissions proposals
TALLAHASSEE — Proposals aimed at curbing Florida’s greenhouse gas
emissions led to skepticism about global warming from a key legislative
committee Tuesday, highlighting potential trouble for the most significant
environmental legislation expected in this year’s regular session.
Members of the House Energy and Utilities Policy Committee spent more than
2½ hours grilling representatives from the Department of Environmental
Protection, Florida Energy and Climate Commission and the Public Services
Commission about efforts to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases. Most scientists consider those gases the main cause of
global warming.
During the session that begins in March, lawmakers are expected to
consider tougher emissions standards on cars sold in the state and a
proposal to ratify a PSC rule requiring privately-owned utilities to
generate 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2020. Next
year, the Legislature is scheduled to consider a system that would cap
greenhouse emissions while allowing polluters to trade pollution
“credits.”
But several committee members seemed skeptical Tuesday about whether
climate change is a man-made phenomenon and whether changes in state
policy could stop it. One, Rep. Lake Ray, R-Jacksonville, wondered about
the price tag, too. (Jacksonville News)
Aborigines
'hardest hit by climate change' - ABORIGINES will feel the impact of
climate warming more than other Australians, with their remote outback
homes and generally poor health making them particularly vulnerable, a
report said today.
With temperatures in the tropical north and interior tipped to rise by 3C
by 2050, worsening already searing summer heat, the Federal Government
needs to urgently improve aboriginal health and housing, researchers wrote
in the Medical Journal of Australia.
"Elevated temperatures and increases in hot spells are expected to be
a major problem for indigenous health in remote areas, where
cardiovascular and respiratory disease are more prevalent and there are
many elderly people with inadequate facilities to cope with the increased
heat stress," they wrote. (Reuters)
One problem, there is absolutely no reason to expect any such
temperature increases.
Really? Study
links swings in North Atlantic oscillation variability to climate warming
- Using a 218-year-long temperature record from a Bermuda brain coral,
researchers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) have
created the first marine-based reconstruction showing the long-term
behavior of one of the most important drivers of climate fluctuations in
the North Atlantic. (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
And there we were thinking what they had demonstrated was merely that
apparent recovery from the LIA coincided with a slight apparent increase
in oscillation amplitude in the NAO...
Tricky stuff, this gorebull warmening... Tropical
Thailand declares emergency as cold hits - A severe cold snap in
Thailand prompted authorities Tuesday to declare an emergency zone across
more than half of the country normally renowned for its tropical weather,
climate officials said. (AFP)
CHILE
CO2 EMISSIONS SET TO QUADROUPLE, SAYS TOKMAN - Chile’s CO2 emissions
are expected to quadruple by 2030 failing change to its national energy
policy, the Chilean Minister for Energy, Marcelo Tokman, warned last week.
The estimated increase is largely credited to the sharp rise in coal-fired
power stations in a report, New Guidelines for Energy Policy, presented to
President Bachelet by the Minister for Energy last Tuesday.
“The growth of coal-based thermal plants may involve an increase in the
countries annual emission, from 70 million tons, at present, to around 300
million tons by 2030, causing per capita output to register higher than
European and other developed countries,” the report said. (Patagonia
Times)
Protecting
The IPCC Turf - There Are No Independent Climate Assessments Of The IPCC
WG1 Report Funded And Sanctioned By The NSF, NASA Or The NRC.
... As it stands now, there are no independent climate assessments of the
IPCC WG1 report funded and sanctioned by the NSF, NASA or the NRC.
The agency representatives at the NRC planning meeting on December 8 2008,
either are inadvertently neglecting the need for independent oversight, or
they are deliberately ignoring this lack of an independent assessment
because the IPCC findings fit their agenda on the climate issue. In either
case, the policymakers and the public are being misled on the degree of
understanding of the climate system, including the human role within in
it. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Dirty snow causes
early runoff in Cascades, Rockies - Soot from pollution causes winter
snowpacks to warm, shrink and warm some more. This continuous cycle sends
snowmelt streaming down mountains as much as a month early, a new study
finds. How pollution affects a mountain range's natural water reservoirs
is important for water resource managers in the western United States and
Canada who plan for hydroelectricity generation, fisheries and farming.
Scientists at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory conducted the first-ever study of soot on snow in the western
states at a scale that predicted impacts along mountain ranges. They found
that soot warms up the snow and the air above it by up to 1.2 degrees
Fahrenheit, causing snow to melt. (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
Yes, altering albedo by discoloration can change snow melt -- which
is why it was one of the contingency plans discussed during the
impending ice age scare of a few decades past.
Satellites search
out South Pole snowfields - As skiers across the world pay close
attention to the state of the snow on the slopes, there are a different
group of scientific snow-watchers looking closely at a South Pole
snowfield this January.
Scientists from around the world coordinated by the UK's National Physical
Laboratory (NPL) are examining an Antarctic snowfield this January as part
of the world's largest inter-comparison between satellite sensors.
The results will allow scientists to fully quantify differences between
the measurements made by the satellite instruments in orbit. This will
lead to improvements in their calibration and ensure that the data
collected is all quality assured. This will ultimately result in more
confidence in the data used for climate change, weather systems and
monitoring disaster areas. Some of these measurements require the
detection of changes of a few tenths of a percent per decade, yet current
sensors exhibit biases between themselves of many percent, often more than
20 times this level.
Over 30 sensors from space agencies across the globe, including several
from the UK, ranging in spatial resolution from a metre to several hundred
metres will measure the reflectance of the sun by the Antarctic snow. All
of the data will be cross-compared to each other supported by ground
measurements of the site.
The measurements will be taken over a snowfield in Antarctica known as
'DOME C'. These can only be performed in December and January when the Sun
is relatively high in the sky during the southern hemisphere summer.
(National Physical Laboratory) [em added]
Virtual world eye-roller: Warming
world will be even hotter than we thought, say scientists - The world
will be hotter than we think if no action is taken to cut greenhouse
emissions, a Wellington conference will hear today.
United States climate modelling expert Matthew Huber - who is speaking at
the Greenhouse Earth Symposium at Te Papa today - says at least one
climate model used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
produces temperatures that are cooler than the real world. Dr Huber is one
of several visiting scientists who use a dramatic period of warming 55
million years ago to predict what will happen in the future. (New Zealand
Herald)
The models are wrong... so it will be even worse! Do you suppose
these clowns will ever reach the obvious conclusion that atmospheric
carbon dioxide levels fail to properly drive climate models because
atmospheric carbon dioxide does not, in fact, drive climate?
Green
Wacko Tobacco - 2008 was a bad year for global warming alarmists.
Their credibility has been entirely destroyed by none other than Mother
Nature. As George W. Bush leaves office, the world is actually cooler than
it was when he came in.
Lacking facts, the Gorian Gaggle is trying to tie anyone who disagrees
with their propaganda to the most evil of all industries (in their eyes):
the tobacco producers. Before, anyone who disputed their prophesying of a
future calamity was merely a “Holocaust denier.” That didn’t work,
so now, we’re all labeled “tobacco scientists.”
Why is it that everything these people say sounds as if it’s echoing up
from the playground or lifted from a note passed in study hall?
(Christopher C. Horner, Human Events)
Saving
Speaker Pelosi: The Inept Politics of the US Cap and Trade Plan - I
won’t be surprised if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Environment
Committee chair Barbara Boxer and President-elect Barack Obama all send
flowers to certain people I generally consider allies in the fight against
committing economic suicide in the name of “global warming.” The
reason: these three supporters of the moribund and politically dangerous
carbon dioxide “cap-and-trade” rationing scheme have just had their
prospects immeasurably improved by those whose ox they hope to Gore. (So
to speak). (Christopher C. Horner, Energy Tribune)
No
proof man is causing Earth's warming trend - According to the
editorial "A New Year's resolution" (Jan. 2), tens of thousands
of scientists like me are "flat-earth types."
I guess my doctorate in chemical physics from Johns Hopkins doesn't give
me nearly the qualifications to analyze the science associated with the
global climate as an editor with an agenda. (Mark Campbell, Baltimore Sun)
How
you pay for tomorrow's scares, today - Disaster addiction - and the
cost of your insurance
In a remarkably gullible news item, the BBC reported that 2008 was a
‘huge year for natural disasters’. "The past year has been one of
the most devastating ever in terms of natural disasters... climate change
[is] boosting the destructive power of disasters like hurricanes and
flooding,” it proclaimed.
This was drawn from a report that found that although there were fewer
“loss-producing events” in 2008 than in the previous year, the impact
of natural disasters was higher. It claimed that more than 220,000 people
died in events like cyclones, earthquakes and flooding, the most since
2004, the year of the Asian tsunami. Global losses totalled about $200bn (£137bn),
with uninsured losses totalling $45bn, about 50 per cent more than in
2007, the report claimed. All of which made 2008 the third most expensive
year on record, after 1995, when the Kobe earthquake struck Japan, and
2005, the year of Hurricane Katrina in the US.
And why would that be? The BBC article quoted expert Torsten Jeworrek, who
claimed: “Climate change has already started and is very probably
contributing to increasingly frequent weather extremes and ensuing natural
catastrophes.”
Thing is, Torsten Jeworrek is an expert in insurance, not climate. He is
on the board of insurance giants Munich Re. And Munich Re are the authors
of the new report. (Stuart Blackman, The Register)
Must be a dreadful idea... U.S.
Must Lead On Economy, Climate Change: Clinton - WASHINGTON - The
United States must work with emerging economies in the current economic
crisis and also must lead the effort to fight global climate change,
Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday. (Reuters)
... since Hillary is for it.
From Nude Socialist: Climate
fix' ship sets sail with plan to dump iron - The largest and to date
the most comprehensive experiment to soak up greenhouse-gas emissions by
artificially fertilising the oceans set sail from South Africa earlier
this week.
The ambitious geoengineering expedition has caused a stir among some
campaigning groups, but has the scientific backing of the UK, German, and
Indian governments, as well as the International Maritime Organisation.
Within weeks, the ship's crew hope to dump 20 tonnes of ferrous sulphate
into the Southern Ocean. Plankton need iron to grow, and the aim of the
expedition is to trigger a plankton bloom and boost the amount of carbon
that is sucked out of the air and locked up at the bottom of the ocean.
The team, led by Victor Smetacek of the Alfred Wegner Institute,
Bremerhaven, Germany, will also monitor the population of krill to see if
their populations also increase. These small crustaceans feed on plankton
and are an important food source for many marine species. So, if the
population grows, this could give fisheries a boost. (New Scientist)
Well, if it boosts fisheries it might be worthwhile, maybe. As for
the fighting the phantom menace thing, fuggedaboudit. And the greenies
are agin it (of course).
The moonbat squeeks: This
is indeed a class war, and the campaign against the Aga starts here -
Climate change allows the richest on earth to trash the lives of the
poorest, no matter how Furedi's cult spins it. (George Monbiot, The
Guardian)
Laffer Gas
- The push for a fuel tax is so funny it hurts.
An economist, a conservative columnist, and a Republican politician walk
into a bar and knock back a few. They get to talking. Pretty soon they're
trying to one-up each other for who can come up with the most outlandish
idea.
"I know," says the economist, "I'll call for a massive hike
in the federal gas tax to be offset by raiding the Social Security trust
fund."
"That's a great one!" shouts the columnist.
"I'll do you one better," says the politician. "Let's sell
it as a conservative reform."
That's the most charitable explanation we can muster for the other week's
"revenue neutral" gas tax hike proposal by three prominent
conservatives. It's a Rube Goldberg-like social engineering scheme of the
kind that most conservatives rejected in the 1970s, along with comparable
worth, the ERA, and mood rings. (William Yeatman & Jeremy Lott,
Culture 11)
United States challenges
Russia's claim to a bigger chunk of the Arctic - WASHINGTON, Jan 12 -
President George W. Bush on Monday issued a directive spelling out the
U.S. interest in the vast oil and natural gas resources held in the
Arctic.
The directive contradicts Russia's claim to a bigger chunk of the Arctic
and its energy supplies, and says the United States wants to work with all
countries that have territory in the region to settle disputes over
boundaries.
"When it comes to energy, the notion isn't a race to the Arctic to
put our flags down," said Benjamin Chang, deputy spokesman for the
National Security Council.
"Our approach is going to be dealing with our fellow Arctic nations
in finding ways to access and develop, when it comes to energy
specifically, that takes into account conservation and the
environment," he added. (Reuters)
Europe
gas halted as Russia-Ukraine deal falters - RUSSIA'S natural gas
supplies bound for a freezing Europe were halted again on Tuesday only a
few hours after a truce had been announced in its "gas war" with
Ukraine.
The Gazprom energy giant accused Ukraine of blocking gas bound for Europe,
while Ukraine blamed "unacceptable'' technical conditions imposed by
Russia.
The breakdown again infuriated the European Union as hundreds of thousands
of people shivered in the depth of winter and factories and schools
remained closed in many countries. (AFP)
Ukraine
Admits Blocking Gas to Europe - Just hours after Russia resumed
delivery of natural gas to the European Union through Ukrainian pipelines,
Kiev has admitted to blocking the supplies. Ukraine is claiming that
Gazprom has established "unacceptable" conditions for the
transit of the gas to Europe. (Der Spiegel)
Putin’s
Dangerous Games - How will a domestic economic crisis affect Russian
foreign policy?
It is discouraging, though not at all surprising, that Moscow has once
again resorted to energy blackmail—having Gazprom, a state-run Russian
monopoly, cut off natural gas shipments to neighboring Ukraine—in hopes
of bullying a pro-Western democracy and frightening the European Union,
which gets roughly one-quarter of its gas supplies from Russia. Vladimir
Putin may now be the Russian “prime minister” and not its formal
president, but he is still the head honcho. For several years now, Putin
has pursued a multipronged strategy aimed at reestablishing his country as
a global power. He has sought to bring Russia’s former Soviet-era
possessions back within its sphere of influence, intimidate the West, and
bolster anti-American regimes around the world, including the governments
of Iran and Venezuela.
While implementing these policies abroad, Putin has gradually but
dramatically rolled back the institutions of democracy at home. Through it
all, he has boasted sky-high approval ratings, thanks mainly to Russia’s
oil-fueled economic boom, his control of the domestic media, and his
skillful manipulation of Russian nationalism. Putin’s game seemed to be
working well when commodity prices were shooting through the roof and the
Kremlin’s coffers were bulging with cash. But now that energy prices
have fallen substantially and the financial crisis has spread, Moscow may
soon face a full-blown economic meltdown, which would inevitably have an
impact on its foreign policy behavior. (Jaime Daremblum, The
American)
Commentary:
Bail out Big 3 by cutting red tape - Reducing excessive regulation
helps Detroit without costing taxpayers
Why are we spending $17 billion of taxpayers' money propping up two
Detroit automakers (notably not Ford Motor Co.)? What the auto companies
really need is a reduction in their regulatory burden.
Through excessive regulation, Congress has placed Detroit at a competitive
disadvantage with foreign automakers, since many rules are aimed at
eliminating the sort of vehicles that Detroit has proved adept at
designing and marketing.
The following deregulatory bailout will help the embattled automakers
without spending a dime of taxpayers' money: (Iain Murray, Detroit News)
More U.S. Backing
Seen Possible For Ethanol Plants - WASHINGTON - Congress may add $1
billion to a U.S. loan guarantee program for construction of cellulosic
ethanol plants, the president of a renewable fuels trade group trade said
on Tuesday.
During a teleconference, Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob
Dinneen said lawmakers apparently were looking at $1 billion for loan
guarantees to bring new feedstocks into use.
A $320 million guarantee program was created in the 2008 farm law for
biorefineries producing advanced fuels such as ethanol from cellulose
found in wood and grass.
Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer says the first guarantee may be issued
soon.
"You need to have some sort of loan guarantee program or you won't
get off the ground," said Chris Standlee of Abengoa Bioenergy, who
also serves as RFA chairman, because the recession makes it harder to
obtain private financing. (Reuters)
And who says ethanol's failure to launch is a bad thing?
Green' gasoline on
the horizon? - University of Oklahoma researchers believe newer, more
environmentally friendly fuels produced from biomass could create
alternative energy solutions and alleviate dependence on foreign oil
without requiring changes to current fuel infrastructure systems.
According to Lance Lobban, director of the School of Chemical, Biological
and Materials Engineering, the development of "green" fuels is
an important part of the world's, and Oklahoma's, energy future.
(University of Oklahoma)
Wind
energy supply dips during cold snap - Britain's wind farms have
stopped working during the cold snap due to lack of wind, it has emerged,
as scientists claimed half the world's energy could soon be from
renewables. (Daily Telegraph)
Rolls-Royce To
Start Tidal Power Turbine Tests - LONDON - British engines and power
systems maker Rolls-Royce will test a one megawatt turbine to generate
electricity from tidal power next year, Ric Parker, director of research
and technology, said.
"It's a huge opportunity for the UK, we're ideally positioned to lead
on this because we have the resources all around us," said Parker,
referring to Britain's location and long coastline which give it a big
chunk of European tidal and offshore wind power.
European Union renewable energy targets may require Britain to deploy an
extra 7,000 wind turbines on and offshore by 2020, but the country has
almost no industry to make these.
Rolls-Royce will embark this summer on sea trials of a half-megawatt (MW)
turbine to harness power from the tide, which it has developed alongside a
company called Tidal Generation Limited, and it plans to test a 1 MW
version in about 18 months. (Reuters)
Truth
is stranger than satire: Dead people to provide "alternative energy
heat" to crematorium - Not even two weeks has passed since GORE
LIED linked to a post from The People's Cube regarding a satirical
proposal to burn dead people as an alternative fuel: (Gore Lied)
Tesla
Roadster - ... Tesla could not complain about what was shown because
it was there. And here’s the strange thing. It didn’t. But someone
did. Loudly and to every newspaper in the world. The Daily Telegraph said
we’d been caught up in a new fakery row. The Guardian accused us of
being “underhanded”. The New York Times wondered if we’d been
“misleading”. The Daily Mail said I could give you breast cancer.
This was weird. Tesla, when contacted by reporters, gave its account of
what happened and it was exactly the same as ours. It explained that the
brakes had stopped working because of a blown fuse and didn’t question
at all our claim that the car would have run out of electricity after 55
miles.
So who was driving this onslaught? Nobody in the big wide world ever minds
when I say a BMW 1-series is crap or that a Kia Rio is the worst piece of
machinery since the landmine. And yet everyone went mad when I said the
Tesla, the red-blooded sports car and great white hope for the world’s
green movement, “absolutely does not work”.
I fear that what we are seeing here is much the same thing professors see
when they claim there is no such thing as man-made global warming.
Immediately, they are drowned out by an unseen mob, and then their funding
dries up. It’s actually quite frightening. (Sunday Times)
Environmental
Health Sciences Decision Making: Risk Management, Evidence, and Ethics:
Workshop Summary - Environmental health decision making can be a
complex undertaking, as there is the need to navigate and find balance
among three core elements: science, policy, and the needs of the American
public. Policy makers often grapple with how to make appropriate decisions
when the research is uncertain. The challenge for the policy maker is to
make the right decision with the best available data in a transparent
process.
The Environmental Health Sciences Decision Making workshop, the first in a
series, was convened to inform the Roundtable on Environmental Health
Sciences, Research, and Medicine on emerging issues in risk management,
"weight of evidence," and ethics that influence environmental
health decision making.
The workshop, summarized in this volume, included an overview of the
principles underlying decision making, the role of evidence and challenges
for vulnerable populations, and ethical issues of conflict of interest,
scientific integrity, and transparency. The workshop engaged science
interest groups, industry, government, and the academic sector. (NAP)
Mobile phone use
not associated with melanoma of the eye - Mobile phone use is not
associated with the risk of melanoma of the eye, researchers report in the
January 13 online issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Although there is no direct link between exposure to radio waves and DNA
damage, which can lead to cancer, studies have examined the possibility of
an association between mobile phone use and melanoma of the eye, also
called uveal melanoma. (Journal of the National Cancer Institute)
Free enterprise? Value
of 2008 Bailouts Exceeds Combined Costs of All Major U.S. Wars – The
total value of the bailouts undertaken by the federal government in 2008
now exceeds the combined cost of every major war the United States has
ever engaged in, according to a comparison of war costs calculated by the
Congressional Research Service (CRS) and the value of the bailouts as
calculated by Bloomberg News or Bianco Research.
According to CRS, all major U.S. wars (including such events as the
American Revolution, the War of 1812, the Civil War, the Spanish American
War, World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, but
not the invasion of Panama or the Kosovo War), cost a total of $7.2
trillion in inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars.
According to Bloomberg, the federal government has made commitments worth
a total of $8.5 trillion in the bailouts of 2008. That includes actual
expenditures as well as loan and asset guarantees. (CNSNews.com)
From
Gaia to Medea: More Hubris - THE Gaia hypothesis first proposed by
British scientist James Lovelock – the notion that all living things are
interlinked as a single self-regulating body – is popular with some
scientists and accords with the idea that because human activity has
changed the chemical composition of the atmosphere we are likely to be
interfering with the climate and upsetting the balance of nature.
Paleontologist, Peter Ward, rejects the notion of Gaia, and is running a
contrarian but equally hubris argument in his new book, ‘The Medea
Hypothesis: Is Life on Earth Ultimately Self-Destructive?’ [1].
Professor Ward suggests because there is no balance of nature mankind will
needs to intervene and thus advocates geoengineering solutions including
to climate change.
I suspect the comments in a recent review [2] are all together too kind,
but nevertheless give some insights into The Medea: (Jennifer Marohasy)
Senate
boosts wilderness protection across US - WASHINGTON – In a rare
Sunday session, the Senate advanced legislation that would set aside more
than 2 million acres in nine states as wilderness. Majority Democrats
assembled more than enough votes to overcome GOP stalling tactics in an
early showdown for the new Congress.
Republicans complained that Democrats did not allow amendments on the
massive bill, which calls for the largest expansion of wilderness
protection in 25 years. But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and
other Democrats said the bill — a holdover from last year — was
carefully written and included measures sponsored by both Republicans and
Democrats.
By a 66-12 vote, with only 59 needed to limit debate, lawmakers agreed to
clear away procedural hurdles despite partisan wrangling that had
threatened pledges by leaders to work cooperatively as the new Obama
administration takes office. Senate approval is expected later this week.
Supporters hope the House will follow suit. (Associated Press)
Removing
cats to protect birds backfires on island - BANGKOK, Thailand — It
seemed like a good idea at the time: Remove all the feral cats from a
famous Australian island to save the native seabirds.
But the decision to eradicate the felines from Macquarie island allowed
the rabbit population to explode and, in turn, destroy much of its fragile
vegetation that birds depend on for cover, researchers said Tuesday.
Removing the cats from Macquarie "caused environmental
devastation" that will cost authorities 24 million Australian dollars
($16.2 million) to remedy, Dana Bergstrom of the Australian Antarctic
Division and her colleagues wrote in the British Ecological Society's
Journal of Applied Ecology.
"Our study shows that between 2000 and 2007, there has been
widespread ecosystem devastation and decades of conservation effort
compromised," Bergstrom said in a statement.
The unintended consequences of the cat-removal project show the dangers of
meddling with an ecosystem — even with the best of intentions —
without thinking long and hard, the study said.
"The lessons for conservation agencies globally is that interventions
should be comprehensive, and include risk assessments to explicitly
consider and plan for indirect effects, or face substantial subsequent
costs," Bergstrom said. (Associated Press)
As Humans Hunt,
Their Prey Gets Smaller: Study - WASHINGTON - Hunting and gathering
has a profound impact on animals and plants, driving an evolutionary
process that makes them become smaller and reproduce earlier, U.S.
researchers reported on Monday.
Their study of hunting, fishing and collecting of 29 different species
shows that under human pressure, creatures on average become 20 percent
smaller and their reproductive age advances by 25 percent.
The human tendency to seek large "trophies" appears to drive
evolution much faster than hunting by other predators, which pick off the
small and the weak, the researchers report in the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences. (Reuters)
Caution
On Precaution - SEVERAL STORIES in recent issues of C&EN and a
conversation and e-mail exchange with an industry colleague who is
involved in regulatory affairs have got me thinking about how we regulate
chemicals in the U.S. Although the system is not perfect, I'm not sure it
is as broken as some activists make it out to be.
Care needs to be taken in implementing any changes in the system to ensure
that useful chemicals aren't unnecessarily branded as harmful and
restricted from commerce. I'm particularly uneasy about the wholesale
application of what is known as the "precautionary principle" to
the regulation of chemicals. (C&EN)
In a
mad world of their own - EU chemophobia knows no bounds. It has
already destroyed minor industries and severely hampered major ones by the
reckless banning of elements and compounds with little consideration of
the possible effects. Now from West Country MEP Neil Parish we have this
announcement: (Number Watch)
The spin: EU
Assembly Votes To Ban Toxic Pesticides - BRUSSELS - European
Parliament members voted on Tuesday to ban some of the most toxic and
dangerous pesticides to human health.
The move, likely to be endorsed by EU ministers in the next weeks, would
let groups of countries with similar geography and climate decide whether
farmers may use specific products.
A list of EU-approved "active substances" will be drawn up, with
certain highly toxic chemicals to be banned unless their effect can be
shown to be negligible -- such as pesticides classified as carcinogenic,
mutagenic or toxic to reproduction.
That list will provide the basis for national EU governments to license
each pesticide. (Reuters)
January 13, 2009
Upcoming whining of the week... - First
Bush administration EPA chief and former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd
Whitman apparently will whine in the upcoming issue of Nature about
Vice President Dick Cheney undercutting her authority at EPA. This is the
same Christine Todd Whitman who, after being nominated by Bush, was asked
by a reporter: "Global warming, what is your thought on what the
state of science is and what can be done to address it?" Whitman
responded: "Still somewhat uncertain. Clearly there's a hole in
the ozone, that has been identified. But I saw a study the other day that
showed that it was closing. It's not as clear, the cause and effect, as we
would like it to be." Perhaps Dick Cheney thought that an EPA
administrator who didn't know the difference between ozone depletion and
global warming might not be capable of implementing Bush administration
environmental policy?
Admission socialism is unaffordable? Economy
May Delay Work on Obama’s Campaign Pledges - WASHINGTON —
Confronted by the worst financial crisis in generations, President-elect
Barack Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress are preparing to delay
some of the promises he made on the campaign trail to avoid political
distractions and focus on reversing the economic slide.
Although Mr. Obama has not publicly identified which priorities will have
to wait, advisers and allies have signaled that they may put off
renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement, overhauling
immigration laws, restricting carbon emissions, raising taxes on the
wealthy and allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly in the military.
(New York Times)
Letter of the moment: Perhaps you should encourage all of you
readers to contact the Exxon Mobil media dept at 972-444-1107 and let them
know just what they think of Rex
Tillerson stumping for carbon taxes. I called and let them have an
earful today. I am considering buying a few shares of their stock just so
I can attend the annual meeting and make a ruckus.
The lesser of two evils is still an evil. (Mike D.)
Their global media contact page is here
and email form is here.
Arianna Huffington
Saves the Day for Climate Alarm - Well, that compendium of the Left's
snits and snivels, The Huffington Post, has managed to embarrass itself
even more aggressively than is their norm. It published a nice
walk-through of the skeptic’s view of manmade warming and, I have it on
very good authority, having informed world-class meteorologist and hostess
Arianna Huffington of its skeptical nature up-front. (Chris Horner, CEI)
The
earth's magnetic field impacts climate: Danish study - The earth's
climate has been significantly affected by the planet's magnetic field,
according to a Danish study published Monday that could challenge the
notion that human emissions are responsible for global warming.
"Our results show a strong correlation between the strength of the
earth's magnetic field and the amount of precipitation in the
tropics," one of the two Danish geophysicists behind the study, Mads
Faurschou Knudsen of the geology department at Aarhus University in
western Denmark, told the Videnskab journal.
He and his colleague Peter Riisager, of the Geological Survey of Denmark
and Greenland (GEUS), compared a reconstruction of the prehistoric
magnetic field 5,000 years ago based on data drawn from stalagmites and
stalactites found in China and Oman.
The results of the study, which has also been published in US scientific
journal Geology, lend support to a controversial theory published a decade
ago by Danish astrophysicist Henrik Svensmark, who claimed the climate was
highly influenced by galactic cosmic ray (GCR) particles penetrating the
earth's atmosphere. (AFP)
“2009
will be one of the five warmest years on record” - The scare: In
early January 2008, as part of an apparently-coordinated spate of stories
in the international news media about “global warming” intended to
distract public attention from the coldest start to a Northern-Hemisphere
winter in at least 30 years and the end of the coldest year for almost a
decade, Reuters ran a story saying that scientists at the Hadley Center
for Forecasting in the UK had proclaimed that 2009 will be “the warmest
year since 2005” and “one of the top-five warmest on record”, at
“more than 0.4 °C above the long-term average”. (Christopher
Monckton, SPPI)
CO2,
Global Warming and Coral Reefs: Prospects for the Future - One of the
long-recognized potential consequences of the ongoing rise in the air’s
CO2 content is CO2-induced global warming, which has been predicted to
pose a number of problems for both natural and managed ecosystems in the
years ahead. Of newer concern, in this regard, are the effects that the
ongoing rise in the air’s CO2 content may have on coral reefs. It has
been suggested, for example, that CO2-induced global warming will do great
damage to corals by magnifying the intensity, frequency, and duration of a
number of environmental stresses to which they are exposed. The predicted
consequences of such phenomena include ever more cases of coral disease,
bleaching, and death. (Craig Idso, SPPI)
Tropical
rainforests are regrowing. Now what? - WASHINGTON - The world's
tropical rainforests are making a comeback, but young vegetation may not
be able to sustain as much diverse wildlife or lock up nearly as much
climate-warming carbon dioxide as old trees did, scientists report.
The rainforest debate has raged publicly for decades, and more recently
has been the subject of behind-the-scenes ferment among conservation
scientists. It is the main topic of a Smithsonian symposium on Monday at
the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington.
These discussions are taking place as the international community is
trying to figure out how to stem global warming. Because tropical forests
sequester the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, they are considered an
essential part of the solution.
About 135,000 square miles (350,000 square kilometers) of the original
forested areas that were cut down by humans are growing back, according to
Greg Asner of the Washington-based Carnegie Institution, a presenter at
the symposium. That is only 1.7 percent of the original forest.
This regrowth is relatively quick, with the shady forest canopy closing in
after just 15 years as trees grow taller and denser, offering habitat for
creatures adapted to just this environment, such as birds with huge eyes
able to see in the leafy gloom.
The basic question -- will rainforests survive? -- has been complicated by
research by Joseph Wright of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
in Panama and Helene Muller-Landau of the University of Minnesota.
These two scientists reported that the future of tropical forests may not
be as bleak as other conservation experts warn, mostly because people who
once lived in or near these forests are moving away, mostly toward cities,
allowing vegetation to grow. (Reuters)
Global
Warming’s Rare Bird? - The truth of the matter is that as the
climate changes, for whatever reason, the earth’s plant and animals do
their best to adapt to it and that adaptation, in many cases, involves
shifting the range over which they inhabit. Whether the sighting of a lone
pine flycatcher in southern Texas is an indication that the pine
flycatcher is expanding northward, or whether this is just a wayward
individual, is probably too soon to tell. But the point we are trying to
make here is that it is okay to rejoice at something that may have a
tie-in to global warming. Good things do happen to “good” species. All
change is not bad. In fact, it is far from obvious that the path of
climate change that we are now on is one in which “bad” changes
dominate “good” ones.
It is just that the press (and alarmists), by and large, don’t want you
to know that. (WCR)
Don’t
forget to vote (Watts Up With That?)
Surfacestations
UK project getting started - As many readers know, I’ve been working
with a team of dedicated volunteers on the US www.surfacestations.org
project since June 2007. We now have over 50% of the 1221 station network
surveyed and new surveys are being added, though slowed somewhat due to
winter months. (Watts Up With That?)
Can
El Nino Events Explain All of the Global Warming Since 1976? – Part 1
- A guest post by Bob Tisdale
NOTE: For those who are new to the subjects of El Nino events and sea
surface temperatures, I’ve tried to make the following discussion as
non-technical as possible without overlooking too many aspects critical to
the discussion. It includes detailed descriptions of many of the processes
that take place before, during, and after El Nino events. The period after
an El Nino event is often neglected, but it holds the oceanic responses
that are the most significant over multiyear periods. (Watts Up With
That?)
Mauna
Loa CO2 record posts smallest yearly gain in its history - maybe -
UPDATE: I received a reply tonight from Pieter Tans, who is the manager
for the MLO data, it is another error in presenting the data, similar to
what happened with GISS in October, a monthly data value was carried over.
In this case, November to December. - Anthony (Watts Up With That?)
Polar
Sea Ice Changes are Having a Net Cooling Effect on the Climate - A
guest post by Steven Goddard
One of the most widely discussed climate feedbacks is the albedo effect of
polar sea ice loss. Ice has a relatively high albedo (reflectance) so a
reduction in polar ice area has the effect of causing more shortwave
radiation (sunlight) to be absorbed by the oceans, warming the water.
Likewise, an increase in polar sea ice area causes more sunlight to be
reflected, decreasing the warming of the ocean. The earths radiative
balance is shown in the image below. It is believed that about 30% of the
sunlight reaching the earth’s atmosphere is directly reflected - 20% by
clouds, 6% by other components of the atmosphere, and 4% by the earth’s
surface. (Watts Up With That?)
More idiotic Ehrlich pronouncements: A
Change in the Air: Is Humankind Now a Force of Planetary Change? -
Bringing up the topic of climate change or global warming in mixed company
can be a party killer. And global heating, as ecologist Paul Ehrlich likes
to call it, is argued to be a planet killer as well.
Skeptics question the ability of human activity to initiate planetary
change. They wonder if building cities, removing forests and increasing
the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere really matter in the big
picture of life on earth. Certainly these do create change, at least
aesthetically: a point with which even skeptics would agree. And there is
also a clear impact on other species as we alter natural habitats by
replacing them with our own housing, farming and transportation networks.
But, the skeptic insists, if human life on earth is imperiled, it is more
so at the hands of a fickle, varying sun; the slim chances of rendezvous
with the next “dinosaur-killer” asteroid; or even the unconscionable
cruelties we invent and perpetrate against ourselves.
Scientific consensus concerning our capacity to affect planetary systems
and conditions has been building over the past decade, however. Of course,
consensus can be wrong. As the most adamant climate-change skeptics are
quick to mention, in the 1970s climatologists were not discussing climate
warming but climate cooling and the potential return to an ice age. This
error hangs over much of what is debated today—among nonscientists. But
there is diminishing doubt in the scientific community that the activity
of human beings is having global impact both climatologically as well as
geologically. (Vision)
French
authorities warn cold snap leaves elderly at risk - The French are
being urged by their government to check up on the elderly to see how
they're coping with a cold snap that has all Europe shivering.
"Elderly and handicapped people who are isolated and who have
problems tend not to go out of the house, and so get fewer visitors due to
the cold," said Francoise Weber of the French national health
surveillance institute.
It reported "a significant increase" in elderly and other
vulnerable people being admitted to hospital, as temperatures drop to as
low as minus 20 degrees Celsius (minus four Fahrenheit) in some parts of
France.
In a radio message broadcast since Friday, the health ministry appealed to
citizens to show "vigilance and solidarity" and ensure that
elderly or chronically ill neighbours are okay.
Besides hypothermia and frostbite, cold winter weather can weaken a
person's cardiovascular and respiratory systems, leaving the lungs more
sensitive to infection, the health institute said. (Agence France-Presse)
Hmm... Government
'destroys jobs' by delaying green revolution - The government is to
close a key support programme for renewable energies almost a year before
it launches a new regime, creating a funding black hole that the industry
has warned could lead to thousands of green job losses. (The Guardian)
... is losing a 'green job' anything comparable to losing a real job?
As far as I can tell a 'green job' is one which is paid for at
exorbitant rates from the public purse and which achieves absolutely
nothing useful. Does anyone other than the recipients of government
largess in the form of our tax monies really believe hugely expensive
and entirely unproductive jobs are an intelligent use of scarce funds?
Energy
think tank publishes new report on causes of global warming - Who is
the real culprit behind global warming? The Japan Society of Energy and
Resources (JSER) pits differing views from five researchers -- some who
attribute the greenhouse effect to CO2 emitted by human activity and
others who express skepticism towards the claim -- against each other in
the latest issue of its journal.
The study titled, "Global warming: What is the scientific
truth?" contained work by Seita Emori, head of the National Institute
for Environmental Studies who participated in the U.N.'s Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as well as Shunichi Akasofu, professor
emeritus at the University of Alaska, Kiminori Ito, professor at Yokohama
National University, and Shigenori Maruyama, professor at the Tokyo
Institute of Technology, three researchers skeptical of the man-made
climate theory, and Kanya Kusano, program director at the Japan Agency for
Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) who takes a neutral stance
towards the issue.
All five researchers agreed either completely or partially with the claim
by the IPCC that "warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is
now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean
temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average
sea level."
However, all but Emori disagreed with the IPCC assertion that "Most
of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th
century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG
concentrations" -- in other words, that global warming is the result
of human activity. (Mainichi Daily News)
We bet they do: Google
disputes Harvard fellow's pollution estimate - The carbon footprint of
a search query is nowhere near the estimate concluded by a Harvard
academic, Google said late Sunday.
British newspaper The Sunday Times published a story on Sunday with
results from a study conducted by Alex Wissner-Gross, a physicist who
estimates a Google search generates 7 grams of carbon dioxide (CO2),
slightly less than half as much CO2 as boiling a kettle for a cup of tea.
Wissner-Gross maintains that it shows a Google search has "a definite
environmental impact."
Google, however, is arguing 7 grams is way off and is trivial compared to
other CO2-spewing activities, such as driving. (New York Times)
Professor
denies global warming theory - Physics professor William Happer GS
’64 has some tough words for scientists who believe that carbon dioxide
is causing global warming.
“This is George Orwell. This is the ‘Germans are the master race. The
Jews are the scum of the earth.’ It’s that kind of propaganda,”
Happer, the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, said in an
interview. “Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Every time you exhale,
you exhale air that has 4 percent carbon dioxide. To say that that’s a
pollutant just boggles my mind. What used to be science has turned into a
cult.”
Happer served as director of the Office of Energy Research in the U.S.
Department of Energy under President George H.W. Bush and was subsequently
fired by Vice President Al Gore, reportedly for his refusal to support
Gore’s views on climate change. He asked last month to be added to a
list of global warming dissenters in a Senate Environment and Public Works
Committee report. The list includes more than 650 experts who challenge
the belief that human activity is contributing to global warming
Though Happer has promulgated his skepticism in the past, he requested to
be named a skeptic in light of the inauguration of President-elect Barack
Obama, whose administration has, as Happer notes, “stated that carbon
dioxide is a pollutant” and that humans are “poisoning the
atmosphere.”
Happer maintains that he doubts there is any strong anthropogenic
influence on global temperature.
“All the evidence I see is that the current warming of the climate is
just like past warmings. In fact, it’s not as much as past warmings yet,
and it probably has little to do with carbon dioxide, just like past
warmings had little to do with carbon dioxide,” Happer explained. (Daily
Princetonian)
Massive
Greenland meltdown? Not so fast, say scientists - The recent
acceleration of glacier melt-off in Greenland, which some scientists fear
could dramatically raise sea levels, may only be a temporary phenomenon,
according to a study published Sunday. (AFP)
Mid-Winter
Report Card - Guest post by Steven Goddard
We are almost at the half way point for the meteorological winter
(December through February) and it is a good time to evaluate how the NOAA
CPC (Climate Prediction Center) and UK Met Office winter forecasts are
doing so far. As seen below, CPC forecast the highest probability of
warmth for Alaska and the upper midwest. (Watts Up With That?)
Can
The Everglades Be Restored To Its Original, Pre-European Condition? -
The Everglades Restoration Plan, while a very important and beneficial
environmental project, intends to “restore the magnificent River of
Grass [the Everglades]“. As they also write: “Marjory Stoneman Douglas
wrote about the problems of the Everglades in 1947, describing a ecosystem
that was beautiful yet already clearly suffering…..The Comprehensive
Everglades Restoration Plan will capture freshwater destined for sea - the
Everglades’ lifeblood - and direct it back to the ecosystem to
revitalize it. It will improve water supplies for people and farms, too.
The nation’s largest such project, it will cost $7.8 billion and take
more than 20 years to develop.”
Having visited Everglades National Park many times, it is a worthy goal to
seek this. However, unfortunately, as we and others have shown, the
weather (and thus the hydrology and ecology) of the Everglades are
affected by what occurs throughout central and southern Florida. The
amount of freshwater today (from rain), unfortunately, is significantly
less then it was prior to European disturbance.
Recently, I was asked to summarize what we have found in our studies of
Florida. This information is given below. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
The Unifying Theory
of Earth’s Climate by Stephen Wilde - Our regular contributor
Stephen Wilde has prepared a new article tying in his previous articles
(published first on the CO2Sceptics site) to recent climate developments.
In doing so he provides a new conceptual overview of Earth's climate
mechanism which appears to fit all observed changes in atmospheric
temperature trends and, in view of the failure of existing climate models,
he suggests a path forward for further research." (Co2sceptic)
From CO2 Science this week:
New Major Report:
CO2,
Global Warming and Coral Reefs: Prospects for the Future: The ongoing
rise in the air's CO2 content has been predicted to
play havoc with earth's coral reefs in two different ways: (1) by
stimulating global warming, which has been predicted to dramatically
enhance coral bleaching, and (2) by lowering the calcium carbonate
saturation state of seawater, which has been predicted to reduce coral
calcification rates. We evaluate the likelihood of such claims in a new
major review paper.
Editorial:
Old Trees Growing
in a CO2-Accreting Atmosphere: They don't just
fade away.
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 657
individual scientists from 384
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from the Northern
Icelandic Shelf, North Atlantic Ocean. To access the entire Medieval
Warm Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Animals
(Insects - Moths): Will the ongoing rise in the air's CO2
content induce moth larvae to devour more of the planet's vegetation?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Corn,
Faba
Bean, Paper
Birch/Quaking Aspen, and Quaking
Aspen.
Journal Reviews:
A Century and a
Half of Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Do the data reveal a
warming-induced increase in storm frequency or intensity?
Tropical
Cyclones of the North Atlantic: How has their activity varied over the
past century and a quarter?
The Impact of
Climate Change on Typhoon Activity: What is the story told by
paleotempestology?
Growth
Enhancement Due to Elevated CO2 in a Semi-Arid
Grassland: Did it experience a progressive decline due to nitrogen
limitation over a five-year period?
Pokeweed
Responses to Elevated Air Temperature and CO2
Concentration: How similar were they to the responses of non-weedy
plants? (co2science.org)
What
is the red dot? - A simple question; what is that red dot on the map?
I was looking at the CONUS map browser depicting the 2008 temperature
departure from normal provided by NOAA’s High Plains Regional Climate
Center and noticed something odd: (Watts Up With That?)
Obama's Clean Energy
Platform (part 1) - President-elect Barack Obama gave a wide-ranging
speech on economic policy this week in which he said that, “To finally
spark the creation of a clean energy economy, we will double the
production of alternative energy in the next three years.” That seems a
modest goal considering how little of the energy we use is currently
produced by alternative sources such as ethanol, windmills, and solar
panels. But it’s a ridiculous goal in such a short time considering the
capacity limitations of these industries and the higher cost to consumers
and taxpayers of the energy that will be produced. Obama also said that he
would begin building a smart electricity grid and require that 75% of
federal buildings and two million private houses be modernized in terms of
energy efficiency within two years. Funding for those goals will probably
be part of the stimulus spending bill that is currently being cooked up.
(Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads Digest)
Obama's Clean Energy
Platform (part 2): Why It Can't Work - So it seems likely that the
target of doubling the use of renewable energy does not actually refer to
the full range of renewables at all, but just to those “acceptable”
alternatives. This would imply that the target is only 1 extra quad of
renewable energy by 2011, which, while it would represent a significant
expansion of those industries, would amount to just a “drop in the
bucket” of total US energy use. And, as we hear in the debate over ANWR
every time it comes up, a “drop in the bucket” is just not worth
doing… (Iain Murray, Open Market blog)
Key
Questions for Steven Chu, Nominee for Secretary of Energy - The United
States Senate will soon render its advice and consent to the nomination of
Steven Chu as the new secretary of the Department of Energy (DOE).
In addition to overseeing the agency's duties conducting energy research
and dealing with nuclear waste issues, a good secretary of energy also
needs to stand as a secretary for energy--in favor of plentiful and
affordable energy supplies for the American people and a supporter of the
free market processes that work best to provide them. The federal
government already has several anti-energy forces in place, particularly
the Environmental Protection Agency, whose statutory duties require it to
impose environmental constraints on energy production and use, especially
fossil fuels, and often without regard to cost. Therefore, it is an
important part of the secretary of energy's job to act as a pro-energy
counterweight to EPA rather than as a redundant anti-energy voice within
the executive branch.
Therefore, when considering Chu for this post, the Senate should consider
asking him the following questions. (Ben Lieberman and Jack Spencer,
Heritage Foundation)
Gas
Peaking as Gazprom Dispute Masks Falling Demand -- Russia’s efforts
to extract more money from Ukraine by cutting off natural gas supplies
sent the fuel to a three-year high in Europe, and set up prices for a
steeper decline. (Bloomberg)
Russian
gas crisis puts a flame under nuclear debate in Europe - Cuts in
Russian gas supplies to Europe via Ukraine have reignited interest in
Europe about using nuclear energy as an alternative to hydrocarbons,
sparking environmentalists' ire.
"On nuclear energy, this crisis will have consequences for the way we
consider energy security in all EU countries," said Czech Energy
Minister Martin Riman, whose country holds the bloc's rotating presidency.
"One of the ways this might happen is to argue in favour of the
return of nuclear energy," he told a news conference in Brussels on
Thursday.
The debate is already going strong in former Soviet bloc members of the
European Union which are highly dependent on Russian gas and have been hit
hard by supply cuts in the standoff between Moscow and Kiev.
Even as Russia and Ukraine neared a deal that would lead to a resumption
of gas supplies, Slovakia said Saturday it would begin reopening a power
generator at the Jaslovske Bohunice nuclear plant because of the cutoff. (AFP)
Nuclear
renaissance faces a big challenge - CONCLUSION: Meeting both emissions
and supply security goals will be difficult, if not impossible, if an
established low-carbon base-load technology like nuclear is ignored.
However, newbuild does not look viable in current market conditions. State
support is needed and may be more forthcoming from governments faced with
recession. (Oxford Analytica)
Seeing
Oil’s Limits, Gulf States Invest Heavily in Clean Energy - ABU
DHABI, United Arab Emirates — With one of the highest per capita carbon
footprints in the world, these oil-rich emirates would seem an unlikely
place for a green revolution.
Gasoline sells for 45 cents a gallon. There is little public
transportation and no recycling. Residents drive between air-conditioned
apartments and air-conditioned malls, which are lighted 24/7.
Still, the region’s leaders know energy and money, having built their
wealth on oil. They understand that oil is a finite resource, vulnerable
to competition from new energy sources. (New York Times)
EUROPE: Trucks
Get a Free Ride to Emit - BRUSSELS - Carbon dioxide emissions from
using Europe's road to transport goods will increase by more than 50
percent within the next two decades, a new study has predicted. (IPS)
Ministers
set to back Heathrow expansion - BAA, the owner of Heathrow, is
expected to receive government backing next week for a third runway at the
west London airport.
Government sources have told the Financial Times that the announcement is
to take place mid-week, if it is agreed at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday
morning. (Financial Times)
Airlines
warn 500,000 new jobs could be lost unless airport expansion is backed
- Airline bosses have warned that 500,000 new jobs would be lost unless
the Government backs a major expansion of Britain's airports.
Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon is this week expected to approve a third
runway for London's Heathrow airport.
The airlines say thousands of jobs will be lost unless developments at
several other UK airports - including a new runway at Stansted - go ahead.
(Sunday Mirror)
Lobbyists
raise pressure on Heathrow - Business and trade union leaders and the
aviation industry stepped up pressure on ministers on Monday to give the
go-ahead this week for a third runway and sixth terminal at Heathrow.
Even if the government approves the £9bn scheme in the coming days –
subject to strict environmental conditions being met – BAA, the
airport’s owner, and British Airways, Heathrow’s biggest operator, say
a third runway is unlikely to be in operation before 2020. (Financial
Times)
Another
promise of a flying car - sigh - All thorough my childhood and
adolescence I was a keen fan of all sorts of science magazines including
Scientific American (the Amateur Scientist was my favorite SciAm column
because it showed how to build things), a subscription magazine from
NASA’s Science Service, Asimov’s sci-fi journal, and yes even Popular
Science and occasionally Popular Mechanics since my dad liked it.
I lost track of how many times the world has been promised a flying car in
those magazines. It seemed like we’d all have a “chicken in every
pot” and a flying car in every garage. I’ve been waiting for years
decades and there have been lots of false starts and outright frauds.
Where the heck is my flying car? (Watts Up With That?)
Too
fat to love a child and be a dad? - There are about 4,000 children
desperately in need of parents to adopt them, every year in the UK,
according to the British Association for Adoption & Fostering. These
children come from a wide range of backgrounds, many are of school age and
with siblings, special needs children with physical handicaps, or those
who’ve been abused or neglected. These children are shuffled among state
facilities, without loving parents to take them in.
That’s what makes today’s news story so heartbreaking… and so wrong.
A young couple desperately wants a child to love and to give a child a
happy and safe home. They’ve been married for eleven years, don’t
drink or smoke, and have a stable home to offer. They were told by
government officials in West Yorkshire, England, that they are unfit to
adopt. The only reason?
Mr. Hall is considered too fat to be a parent. Too fat to love a child.
(Junkfood Science)
Sunday
reading: The government's Interception Modernisation Programme — the
costs of security
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.— Benjamin Franklin, 1775
News across Europe has been reporting for months on the government's
Interception Modernisation Programme. It is every bit as Orwellian as it
sounds. As part of a European Commission directive, beginning on March
15th, all internet service providers in the UK will be required by law to
collect records on all internet traffic and every e-mail, to be stored in
a national central database.
According to the Office of Security & Counter-Terrorism at the Home
Office in its 2007 Strategy, the Interception Modernisation Programme is
critical for building intelligence to respond to terrorism and protect
national interests. “Our ability to intercept communications and obtain
communications data lawfully is critical to combating the threat posed by
terrorism and tackling serious crime,” the Secretary of State reported
to Parliament last year.
A spokesperson with the Home Office told BBC News that monitoring internet
activity “will allow investigators to identify suspects, examine their
contacts, establish relationships between conspirators and place them in a
specific location at a certain time.” While purportedly for national
security, the information will be required to be made available to any
public body that requests it, which could include law enforcement, local
councils and health agencies. (Junkfood Science)
Elders'
blood pressure varies with outdoor temps - NEW YORK - A study
conducted in France shows that elderly men and women experience
significant blood pressure changes as outdoor temperatures rise and fall,
with higher blood pressure readings often seen in cold weather.
Higher blood pressure in the winter months could increase risk for stroke
or other vascular events, warn Dr. Christophe Tzourio, of the French
national research institute INSERM in Paris, and colleagues in a report
published today in the Archives of Internal Medicine. (Reuters Health)
Obese
Americans now outweigh the merely overweight - WASHINGTON - The number
of obese American adults outweighs the number of those who are merely
overweight, according to the latest statistics from the federal
government.
Numbers posted by the National Center for Health Statistics show that more
than 34 percent of Americans are obese, compared to 32.7 percent who are
overweight. It said just under 6 percent are "extremely" obese.
"More than one-third of adults, or over 72 million people, were obese
in 2005-2006, the NCHS said in its report. (Reuters)
Overeating
in the genes for some kids, study says - LONDON - When it comes to
cookies, some children really can't help themselves, British researchers
said on Monday.
In an experiment, researchers offered 131 four- to five-year-olds a plate
of cookies after they had eaten a meal.
They found that the children who ate more cookies were more likely to have
certain variations of the FTO gene, a gene linked to larger body size,
suggesting that for some overeating is genetically programmed.
"This research ... tells us more about how some children are more
responsive to signals in their bodies encouraging them to eat when full
than others," said Jane Wardle of University College London, who led
the study.
"Knowing how the genes work is the first step to minimising these
negative effects," she said in a statement. (Reuters Life!)
Hormone
clue could lead to pre-natal screening for autism - Babies exposed to
high levels of testosterone in the womb have a higher risk of developing
autistic traits, research has revealed.
The link to the male hormone could provide a way to test unborn babies for
the condition and has added a new dimension to the debate about the ethics
of screening.
The research suggests than abnormally high levels of testosterone in the
womb could be one of the triggers for autistic traits to develop up to ten
years later. (Daily Mail)
Car
noise increases your risk of heart attack by 38% - Long-term exposure
to even relatively low levels of noise, such as traffic outside the house,
may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, heart attack and high
blood pressure.
While it has long been known that exposure to loud noise can cause hearing
loss, it had been thought that relatively low levels of environmental
noise were not a danger.
But research is increasingly showing that such noise can have adverse
effects. (Daily Mail)
Open-plan
offices are making workers sick, say Australian scientists - THE
evidence is overwhelming - working in an open plan office is bad for your
health.
Australian scientists have reviewed a global pool of research into the
effect of modern office design, concluding the switch to open-plan has led
to lower productivity and higher worker stress.
"The evidence we found was absolutely shocking,'' researcher Dr
Vinesh Oommen from the Queensland University of Technology's Institute of
Health and Biomedical Innovation, said. (AAP)
The saddest part is that some people actually believe this crap: Company
fined over ‘energised’ water claims - A company has been fined
$25,000 in the Auckland District Court after making bogus claims about its
bottled water products.
Big Blue, which sells, supplies and processes water and sells/rents water
coolers, was found to have breached the Fair Trading Act by making false
claims about two of its products, Energised Distilled Water and Energised
Mineral Water.
Both products used purified tap water, which the company claimed was then
"energised" using what was described as Wasser 2000 Vibration
Technology.
In the case of the "energised mineral water", minerals imported
from South Korea were also added.
Big Blue claimed on its website that the Wasser technology process "neutralises
the harm caused by toxins through re-programming the waters polarity and
restoring it to its 'primordial' or natural state. This natural state
provides beneficial health giving frequencies." (National Business
Review)
Nutrient Diligence
Needed For Vegetarian Kids -- Children who want to be vegetarians need
to "fill in the blanks" of their low-protein diets by eating
alternatives to red meat, fish and poultry, experts say.
Good examples are soybeans, fortified soy milk and nuts. Those are
important sources of the protein, iron, zinc, calcium and vitamin D that
most kids get from meat.
Nutritional yeast - which has a cheesy flavor - has the much-needed
vitamin B-12. And flaxseed is good for linolenic acid.
Vegetarian children who eat eggs and dairy products will most likely get
all the nutrition they need. But those who become vegan - abstaining from
dairy - need to be more diligent, said Dr. David Ludwig of Children's
Hospital Boston, a specialist in pediatric nutrition.
"It really requires much more attention to avoid nutrient
deficiencies," Ludwig said. (AP)
Or, alternatively, feed them like the omnivores they are.
Experts
track record shark numbers off beaches - SHARK numbers are soaring
along the NSW coast, with one expert warning they have increased by up to
80 per cent.
Advising swimmers to be extremely careful when entering the water,
director of Surfwatch Australia Michael Brown said: "They are here to
feed. People should be cautious."
He said not only were all shark species increasing, they were also getting
bigger, The Daily Telegraph reports.
Waters are cold around Australia and cold-water critter sightings are
up. Go figure...
Bush's
Achievements - Ten things the president got right. - The postmortems
on the presidency of George W. Bush are all wrong. The liberal line is
that Bush dangerously weakened America's position in the world and rushed
to the aid of the rich and powerful as income inequality worsened. That is
twaddle. Conservatives--okay, not all of them--have only been a little bit
kinder. They give Bush credit for the surge that saved Iraq, but not for
much else.
He deserves better. His presidency was far more successful than not. And
there's an aspect of his decision-making that merits special recognition:
his courage. Time and time again, Bush did what other presidents, even
Ronald Reagan, would not have done and for which he was vilified and
abused. That--defiantly doing the right thing--is what distinguished his
presidency.
Bush had ten great achievements (and maybe more) in his eight years in the
White House, starting with his decision in 2001 to jettison the Kyoto
global warming treaty so loved by Al Gore, the environmental lobby, elite
opinion, and Europeans. The treaty was a disaster, with India and China
exempted and economic decline the certain result. Everyone knew it. But
only Bush said so and acted accordingly.
He stood athwart mounting global warming hysteria and yelled,
"Stop!" He slowed the movement toward a policy blunder of
worldwide impact, providing time for facts to catch up with the dubious
claims of alarmists. Thanks in part to Bush, the supposed consensus of
scientists on global warming has now collapsed. The skeptics, who point to
global cooling over the past decade, are now heard loud and clear. And a
rational approach to the theory of manmade global warming is possible.
(Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard)
January 12, 2009
The world according to The Indy: Oil
giant comes in from the cold - Exxon funded global warming denial for
years. Yesterday, in an astonishing U-turn, it called for the imposition
of green taxes.
The boss of ExxonMobil, the world's largest oil company, has called for a
carbon tax to tackle global warming, marking a volte-face by the firm once
described by Greenpeace as Climate Criminal No 1. Assailed from all sides
by scientists and a new cadre of US politicians, led by the
President-elect, Barack Obama, the landmark concession by Rex Tillerson
represents a nod to realpolitik after years when the company denied the
existence of man-made global warming. (The Independent)
What these guys have never figured out is that big businesses
couldn't care less about carbon costs to the consumer as long as they
are not disadvantaged in the application (the consumer is going to pay
for it and since margins are worked as a percentage it guarantees an
increase in company profits). The illusion that big anything actively
fought (or specifically funded a campaign to fight) gorebull warming
hysteria is a nonsense myth perpetrated by hysterics and perpetuated by
the media. You, the consumer, are going to pay all the costs of this
misanthropic nonsense and you need to resist or at least support
those fighting this nonsense on your behalf. If you don't there's no
point complaining when you are cold and poor, that's too late.
Anyway, it's Google's fault: Google
searches costly for the planet - PERFORMING two Google searches from a
desktop computer can generate about the same amount of carbon dioxide as
boiling a kettle for a cup of tea, according to new research.
While millions of people tap into Google without a thought for the
environment, a typical search generates about 7g of CO2. Boiling a kettle
generates about 15g. "Google operates huge data centres around the
world that consume a great deal of power," said Alex Wissner-Gross, a
Harvard University physicist whose research on the environmental impact of
computing is due out soon.
"A Google search has a definite environmental impact." Google is
secretive about its energy consumption and carbon footprint. It also
refuses to divulge the locations of its dozens of data centres.
However, with more than 200m internet searches estimated globally every
day, the level of electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
caused by computers and the internet is provoking concern. A recent report
by Gartner, the industry analysts, said the global IT industry generated
as much greenhouse gas as the world's airlines - about 2 per cent of
global CO2 emissions. "Data centres are among the most
energy-intensive facilities imaginable," said Evan Mills, a scientist
at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. (Times Online)
Carbon
Tax: The Lesser Of Two Evils - Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson, long
reviled by environmentalists for his skepticism of extreme global warming
claims, now supports a tax on C02 emissions. A new convert to the cause?
We doubt it.
In a speech last Thursday, Tillerson said a carbon tax would be a
"more direct, a more transparent and a more effective approach"
than many of the current plans for curbing greenhouse gases, including the
cap-and-trade approach favored by President-elect Barack Obama.
In supporting the carbon tax, Tillerson "has become an unlikely
member of a club that includes former Vice President Al Gore, consumer
advocate Ralph Nader and President-elect Barack Obama's designated head of
the National Economic Council, Larry Summers," the Wall Street
Journal noted.
In point of fact, Tillerson hasn't joined any club.
Like many CEOs these days in energy-producing industries, he's just afraid
his company will soon be hit with a tidal wave of new regulation to curb
greenhouse gas emissions — regulations that will destroy trillions of
dollars of U.S. wealth. (IBD)
Hollywood:
Pushing Global Warming Down Your Throat - One of Hollywood’s main
heroes today is former Vice President Al Gore due to the success of his
film “An Inconvenient Truth.” In this documentary, Gore tries to
explain to the public that man-made global warming is real and that
something has to change if we want to undo the damage we cause to this
wonderful planet which would have been so much more wonderful if only
those pesky humans lived on, say, Mars.
Since the above is a message Hollywood can believe in, liberal actors and
directors (but I am repeating myself) jumped on the bandwagon and repeated
it whenever possible. See for instance the $80 million remake of “The
Day The Earth Stood Still” starring Keanu Reeves. Sci-Fi fans like
myself will be happy to know that watching this movie is like listening to
Barbara Streisand (or Jane Fonda) give a a political speech. The original
movie may have been great, the remake is nothing but Al Gore’s “An
Inconvenient Truth” poured in a sci-fi jacket. (Michael van der Galien,
Big Hollywood)
Climate-change
alarmism runs into a reality check - The new century has cooled the
case for climate alarmism. Global warming has stalled — not accelerated
as expected. Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere have
increased, but temperatures have been flat for the last eight years and
have slightly fallen since 1998's El Nino-driven temperature spike.
If the cool-off continues until 2015, as could be the case according to a
study published in Nature magazine, we will have had a see-saw of global
warming (1900-45), global cooling (1945-75), global warming (1975-98), and
flatness (1998-2015).
Where does all of this leave us coming out of the Little Ice Age that
ended in the mid-18th century — and after a century of greenhouse gas
buildup in the atmosphere? Today's temperature is about 1 degree
Fahrenheit warmer, and in a naturally warmer climate cycle. Compare this
to Al Gore's scary talk about an 11-degree man-made temperature rise this
century under business as usual.
One decade does not end the debate. But it is yet another data point
against treating carbon dioxide as a pollutant and stringently regulating
today's consumer-chosen energy economy. And it explains the desperation of
those who accuse critics of climate catastrophism as being
"deniers" (as in Holocaust deniers) and "flat earthers."
Of course the climate is changing — always has and always will — and
there may very well be a distinct human influence on climate. Carbon
dioxide is a warming agent, as are the other greenhouse gases emitted into
the atmosphere from human activities. But the good news is that so far the
observed climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases is much less than what
some climate models predict. (Robert L. Bradley, Houston Chronicle)
Global warming
and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart - abstract:
Speculations on the potential impact of climate change on human health
frequently focus on malaria. Predictions are common that in the coming
decades, tens – even hundreds – of millions more cases will occur in
regions where the disease is already present, and that transmission will
extend to higher latitudes and altitudes. Such predictions, sometimes
supported by simple models, are persuasive because they are intuitive, but
they sidestep factors that are key to the transmission and epidemiology of
the disease: the ecology and behaviour of both humans and vectors, and the
immunity of the human population. A holistic view of the natural history
of the disease, in the context of these factors and in the precise setting
where it is transmitted, is the only valid starting point for assessing
the likely significance of future changes in climate. (Paul Reiter,
Insects and Infectious Disease Unit, Institut Pasteur)
Looks like Andy has been self-medicating: The
Faustian Bargain - How a carbon-emitting atom-splitting species
threatens to turn a planet into a radioactive 3 to 6 degrees c high sea
level world. (Andrew Glikson, webdiary)
The world according to a railway engineer: State
of the World 2009 - The following is Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri's
foreword to State of the World 2009: Into a Warming World, which will be
published by the Worldwatch Institute next week. Dr. Pachauri will be
keynoting the 13th Annual State of the World Symposium in Washington, D.C.
on January 15, 2009. (New Nation)
Um, no: Scientists
Refute Argument Of Climate Skeptics — Scientists at the GKSS
Research Centre of Geesthacht and the University of Bern have investigated
the frequency of warmer than average years between 1880 and 2006 for the
first time. The result: the observed increase of warm years after 1990 is
not a statistical accident. (ScienceDaily)
If you believe the near-surface record (something of an act of faith
in itself) then Earth has generally been warming over the the last four
centuries (entirely plausible to have warming since the depths of the
Little Ice Age and supported by recorded history of human events). What
this doesn't do is tell us why this warming has occurred or how long it
might persist. Neither does it suggest anything unusual nor signal any
danger.
It is unclear exactly what argument they think this press release
refutes.
Oh boy... Sea
absorbing less CO2, scientists discover - Scientists have issued a new
warning about climate change after discovering a sudden and dramatic
collapse in the amount of carbon emissions absorbed by the Sea of Japan.
The shift has alarmed experts, who blame global warming.
The world's oceans soak up about 11bn tonnes of human carbon dioxide
pollution each year, about a quarter of all produced, and even a slight
weakening of this natural process would leave significantly more CO2 C02
in the atmosphere. That would require countries to adopt much stricter
emissions targets to prevent dangerous rises in temperature. (The
Guardian)
... on the one hand: cool, that means the oceans tend to saturate and
won't turn acidic, endangering all the little shelled critters, right?
On the other hand: atmospheric carbon dioxide is a major benefit to the
biosphere -- it's an essential trace gas -- so losing less to the oceans
would be a plus. Sadly, we can't draw either conclusion because oceanic
CO2 absorption varies with currents, temperature, saturation,
wind-driven surface wave mixing, stratification... a localized change
tells us, um, nothing really.
Partly right: Poor
will be hit hardest by climate change - The poorest people in the UK,
already struggling to heat their homes and buy healthy food, will be hit
hardest by green taxes, according to a new study.
A new coalition of leading UK environmental and social justice groups have
warned poor housing, health, lack of home insurance and less money to
adapt will mean the deprived are worst hit by climate change.
The impacts of rising temperatures will affect them most, as they tend to
live in lower quality, less energy-efficient housing, have less access to
insurance in case of floods or storm damage and less money to adapt to
higher prices of fuel and food. (Daily Telegraph)
Note that the big risks are a result of climate hysteria and green
taxes -- a warmer globe does not make it harder for people to heat their
homes any more than a CO2-enriched one increases food prices
or scarcity. The problem is not now nor ever has been AGW but rather AGW
hysteria.
The
Battle of the Bulbs: A very British conflict - Incandescent is the
only word to describe the furore over energy-saving illumination. David
Randall sheds light on the row over how we get switched on
At around a quarter past four this afternoon, just at official lighting-up
time, some of Britain's 500 million light bulbs will be turned on in the
daily ritual that, deservedly, normally draws not the slightest spark of
interest or comment. Today, however, is likely to be different. Thanks to
shops starting to withdraw from sale old-style 100-watt bulbs ahead of a
looming Europe-wide ban, Britain's domestic lighting traditionalists have
belatedly realised that the forces of Brussels and eco-progressivism are
in the process of doing away with the light they have read and lived by
all their lives.
The bulbs are incandescent, and so, too, are their users. Worried, too.
Living- room conservatives are looking up at the trusty old Osram burning
brightly in the lampshade above their heads, and wondering for how much
longer they can rely on its flicker-free illumination. (The Independent)
Labour
peer set to make a fortune out of eco-bulbs with 2.4m shares in Britain's
biggest lamp recycler - A former Labour Cabinet Minister is expecting
to make a fortune from the Government’s controversial decision to phase
out traditional light bulbs and replace them with a low-energy version.
Lord Barnett, who was Treasury Chief Secretary in the Seventies and later
vice-chairman of the BBC, is a major investor in a company that stands to
reap massive profits as the new-style bulbs are recycled. (Daily Mail)
Sheesh! Giant
plasma TVs face ban in battle to green Britain - New rules will phase
out energy-guzzling flatscreen televisions as the EU brings its climate
campaign to the living room
Energy-guzzling flatscreen plasma televisions will soon be banned as part
of the battle against climate change, ministers have told The Independent
on Sunday.
"Minimum energy performance standards" for televisions are
expected to be agreed across Europe this spring, they say, and this should
lead to "phasing out the most inefficient TVs". At the same
time, a compulsory labelling system will be drawn up to identify the best
and worst devices.
The moves, which follow last week's withdrawal of the 100W incandescent
lightbulb, are part of a drive to slow the rapid growth of electricity
consumption in homes by phasing out wasteful devices and introducing more
efficient ones. Giant plasma televisions – dubbed "the 4x4s of the
living room" – can consume four times as much energy as traditional
TVs that used cathode ray tubes (CRTs). (The Independent)
Emissions
trading scheme will 'raise food prices, lower exports' - AUSTRALIA'S
proposed climate change regime would push up food prices, cut inflows to
the Murray-Darling and cut agricultural exports if it continues to
encourage the development of carbon sink forests.
A research paper co-authored by Mick Keogh and Alex Thompson of the
Australian Farm Institute has warned that livestock farmers faced with
declining profitability under higher carbon emission prices will be
encouraged to sell their land to forestry plantations, or convert
significant portions of farms to permanent carbon-sink forests.
Mr Keogh, the Australian Farm Institute's chief executive, said Treasury
modelling for an emissions trading scheme projected that up to 40 million
hectares of new tree plantations would be established up to 2050 -- as
Australia sought to offset carbon emissions -- with the bulk of these
being in high rainfall areas of northeast NSW and southeast Queensland.
(The Australian)
“Regional
Climate Modelling” - Call For Abstracts - This announcement was
called to our attention by René Laprise (IAMAS), Jens Christensen (IACS),
Markus Meier (IAPSO)
The IAMAS, IAPSO and IACS invite the international atmospheric,
oceanographic and cryospheric research community to MOCA-09, their Joint
Assembly, to be held in July 2009 in Montréal, Québec, Canada:
The deadline for submission of abstracts is January 23, 2009 (Roger Pielke
Sr., Climate Science)
2nd
Lund Regional-Scale Climate Modelling Workshop: 21st Century Challenges in
Regional Climate Modelling - The U.S. National Science Foundation has
sponsored a limited number of awards of up to $2000 each to support
participation in the workshop by graduate students and postdoctoral
associates who are affiliated with institutions in the United States. The
workshop will be held in Lund, Sweden, 4 - 8 May 2009. For more
information see the Conference website or the Call for Papers.
Download the announcement and application form by which people can apply
for these funds.
Submit applications for support to baltex (at) gkss.de not later than 15
February 2009. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
“Regional
And Global Impacts Of Land Cover Change And Sea Surface Temperature
Anomalies” by Findell et al. 2008 - There is an excellent new paper
that investigates the role of land cover change on climate. It is Findell,
K.L., A.J. Pitman, M.H. England, and P.J. Pegion, 2008: Regional and
Global Impacts of Land Cover Change and Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies.
Journal of Climate: In Press. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2580.1 (Roger Pielke
Sr., Climate Science)
CLIMATE
CHANGE-BRAZIL: Calls for Adaptation Unheeded - RIO DE JANEIRO, Jan 9 -
Torrential rains have deluged several Brazilian states since November,
causing nearly 200 deaths so far and reinforcing environmentalist
campaigns calling for urgent climate change adaptation measures. (IPS)
Actually torrential rains in Brazil are hardly unusual nor unexpected
("normal" would be the fairest description) but it is nice to
see enviros waking up to the fact that adaptation is not only humanity's
tradition recourse, it is the only possible response to whatever change
might occur.
The
global tropical cyclone season of 2008: below average - It was a below
average year for global tropical cyclone activity, and the destructive
power of these storms was close to the lowest levels observed since since
reliable records began in the early 1980s. However, the the total number
of global deaths from tropical cyclones was the highest since 1991, thanks
to the estimated 140,000 people killed in Myanmar from Tropical Cyclone
Nargis. The total number of storms world-wide was 90, slightly lower that
the average from the past 25 years of 92 (Figure 1). The global number of
hurricanes, intense hurricanes (Category 3 and higher), and Category 4 and
stronger storms were all below average. Only one Category 5 storm was
recorded in 2008--Super Typhoon Jangmi, which attained winds of 165 mph at
06 GMT on September 27, as it approached the north coast of Taiwan. The
last time so few Category 5 storms were recorded globally was in 1974,
when there were none. The 2008 hurricane season was much above average in
the Atlantic, but the Atlantic only accounts for about 13% of all global
tropical cyclone activity. (Weather Underground)
Probe
into warming - WINNIPEG -- Researchers are hoping the huge tusks of
the walrus and choppers of the beluga whale will help track the increasing
impact of global warming on Canadian Arctic mammals and the Inuit
communities that eat them.
Scientists with Fisheries and Oceans Canada in Winnipeg are preparing to
study the teeth of mammals killed during Inuit hunts to look for any signs
that greenhouse gases are taking a toll.
Although scientists have studied the teeth for many years, this is the
first time they are being used to unlock the impact climate change is
having in the North.
Experts expect to find a growing number of contaminants like mercury and
PCBs in the teeth, as well as evidence of a thinning diet. (Canadian
Press)
Q&A with Roger Pielke, Jr.
on the climate change story - Roger Pielke, Jr is a Professor in the
University of Colorado’s Environmental Studies Program and a Fellow of
the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. He
focuses on the nexus of science and technology in decision making. I was
looking for Pielke to provide some advice to journalists who might be
called on to cover climate change in the coming years: (CEJournal)
Climate
change: Melting credibility - Remember how mankind's abuse of fossil
fuels was going to cause the North Pole's ice cap to melt completely in
2008?
Remember how the beloved polar bear was in danger of soon becoming extinct
because there was too little sea ice from which bears could hunt their
favorite dinners of ringed seal pups?
It turns out that both of these global warming scare stories were as full
of it as Al Gore's Oscar-winning docu-comedy "An Inconvenient
Truth." (Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)
Keeping the
IPCC Honest – Part II - IPCC reports, and particularly their
Summaries for Policy Makers (SPM), are noted for their bias in support of
the political goal of control of fossil fuels in order to fight alleged
anthropogenic global warming AGW).
The most blatant example is the Second Assessment Report (SAR), completed
in 1995 and published in 1996. Its SPM contains the memorable phrase
“The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on
global climate.”
This ambiguous phrase conveys a mental picture of climate scientists,
preferably with gray beards, sitting around a table judging both human and
natural influences, looking at published scientific research, and
carefully weighing their decision. Nothing of the sort has ever happened.
The IPCC has consistently ignored the real natural influences on climate
change and has focused almost entirely on human causes, especially GH
gases—and more especially on carbon dioxide, which is linked to
industrial activities and therefore bad almost by definition.
How then does the IPCC-SAR arrive at this “balance?” It was done by
carefully removing references to any doubt that human influences are the
major or almost exclusive cause of warming. I will quote here from the WSJ
(August 13,1996) article, written by the late Professor Frederick Seitz.
He compared the draft approved by the authors of IPCC-SAR Chapter 8
(Detection and Attribution) and the final printed text. He noted that key
phrases had been deleted from the approved draft before printing. (CFP)
This item is unattributed but I believe the original author to be
Professor S. Fred Singer.
What is it with princes? Antarctic
damage alarming: Monaco's Prince - PUNTA ARENAS, Chile: Prince Albert
of Monaco said on Thursday there were alarming signs of damage to the
Antarctic environment and called for more scientific research into threats
such as global warming.
The Prince, at the southern tip of Chile on a stop-over during a
three-week series of visits to Antarctica lasting until Jan. 21, also told
Reuters in an interview that he would pay to offset the greenhouse gas
emissions from his own visit by investing in renewable energies.
"There are a few alarming signs" of change in Antarctica, he
said in Punta Arenas after touring islands at the north of the Antarctic
peninsula with the head of the Chilean Antarctic Institute and other
experts. The Prince, who won an award in 2008 from the UN Environment
Programme (UNEP) for efforts to safeguard the planet, is traveling to more
than 20 research stations, including a ski trip to the South Pole. He last
visited the North Pole two years ago. (Reuters)
Meanwhile, back at the ranch: Earth
on the Brink of an Ice Age - The earth is now on the brink of entering
another Ice Age, according to a large and compelling body of evidence from
within the field of climate science. Many sources of data which provide
our knowledge base of long-term climate change indicate that the warm,
twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather soon be coming to an
end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions for the next
100,000 years. (Gregory F. Fegel, Pravda.Ru)
This item was also submitted to JunkScience.com by Fegel, an author
unknown to us but apparently from Portland, Oregon. He appears to be a
frequent contributor to Pravda and has anti-American, anti-Israeli rants
scattered about the web, sometimes under the handle "cloudmessenger".
His scientific credentials, if any, are unknown.
Markey Nets Top Energy
Post; Congress Gets More Dangerous - Waxman and Markey make a
dangerous combination. They are both global warming alarmists, and they
both have the utmost confidence in the ability of government to solve the
crisis they propagate. From them we should expect radical, heavily statist
energy policies to ward off the supposed threat of climate change.
(William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Obama Renewables
Plan More Ambitious Than Appears - LOS ANGELES - President-elect
Barack Obama's call for an ambitious renewable energy plan underscores
just how bad things have gotten for makers of solar panels and wind
turbines.
The goal to double alternative energy production in three years will
effectively maintain the high-flying industry's recent growth rates rather
than targeting sharper increases, reflecting the harsh new reality facing
green power.
"Doubling over that period is a little more ambitious than one would
have thought six months ago," said Banc of America Securities-Merrill
Lynch analyst Steven Milunovich. "It's not a huge stretch goal but
given what growth rates probably are now it's realistic and may even be a
little bit of a push." (Reuters)
Albuquerque
Police Abandon Use of E-85 - The City of Albuquerque is quietly
abandoning part of its push for a greener Albuquerque after finding that
E-85 powered vehicles are not all they are cracked up to be. The city
found they cost more to run and to keep running.
In October of 2005, the mayor was all smiles when he showed off his
E-85-fueled truck. It was given to him by by General Motors, which was
promoting ethanol-fueled vehicles.
Enchanted with the idea of going green, the city bought a couple hundred
police cars. The problem is all the green the city is spending to keep
those cars running green. (KOAT) | Albuquerque
Uses Alternative Fuels (Albuquerque Green)
Automakers
go for electric cars, but will drivers? - DEARBORN, Michigan: Inside
Ford Motor, it was called Project M - to build a prototype of a totally
electric, battery-powered car in just six months.
When it was started last summer, the project was considered a tall order
by the small team of executives and engineers assigned to it. After all,
the auto industry can take years to develop vehicles.
But Ford was feeling pressure from competitors and decided it could not
afford to fall behind in the rapidly expanding race to put electric cars
in dealers' showrooms.
"Frankly, I think it's a gamble not to do it," William Ford Jr.,
the company's executive chairman, said in an interview. "It's clear
that society is headed down this road."
Certainly, Ford and other carmakers are betting billions of dollars on
this new direction, at a time when they can ill afford it and when Detroit
is facing government scrutiny after the $17.4 billion bailout of General
Motors and Chrysler by the U.S. government. (IHT)
Russia-Ukraine
Deal On Gas For Europe Hits Trouble - MOSCOW/KIEV - A deal to restore
Russian gas supplies via Ukraine to Europe appeared on the verge of
collapse after Moscow rejected additions by Kiev as a 'mockery of common
sense'.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev appealed to EU leaders late on Sunday to
exert influence on Kiev to withdraw the annotations. Government sources
said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had proposed sending officials to
Brussels on Monday for emergency talks.
Ukraine, its own supplies cut off in a dispute with Moscow over the price
it pays for Russian gas, signed an agreement on Sunday allowing monitors
to check gas flows across its territory to Europe and assuage Russian
fears Kiev would siphon off gas for itself. But it appended its own
declaration to the deal Russia had signed a day earlier.
The European Union was also party to the deal and EU monitors had already
begun arriving when the new dispute flared. (Reuters)
Heathrow's
third runway to fall foul of EU rules - Ministers will give a green
light to the airport's extension, but critics say Europe's pollution
targets could prevent it from being built
Heathrow's controversial third runway – due to be given the green light
by ministers this week – is unlikely ever to be built because it will
fall foul of new European pollution laws, environmentalists and senior
government advisers believe.
The airport's two existing runways already cause air pollution which
breaches compulsory European Union air-quality standards, which Britain
will have to observe by 2015. Neither anti-runway campaigners nor the
Government's Environment Agency see how these can possibly be met if the
number of flights rises by 50 per cent as planned. (The Independent)
Proof
at last... aliens in UFOs are far more intelligent than we are - If
visitors from another galaxy really are going round destroying wind
turbines, then it is the proof we have been waiting for that aliens are
more intelligent than we are.
The swivel-eyed, intolerant cult, which endlessly shrieks – without
proof – that global warming is man-made, has produced many sad effects.
The collapse of proper education has made two whole generations vulnerable
to rubbishy fads.
But the disfiguring of the country with useless windmills, and the insane
plan to ban proper light bulbs, are supreme triumphs of this dimwit
pseudo-religion.
Both schemes override facts and logic. During the current cold spell,
observant persons will have noticed that there has been very little wind,
a rather common combination. (Peter Hitchens, Daily Mail)
Third-hand
smoke and chemtrails — invisible toxin fears - Fears that invisible
toxins — in such tiny amounts they can barely even be measured — are
everywhere and can cause brain damage or cancer in babies and children
were reinforced this week by media and a medical journal. So great were
the fears among parents, and so great were the political and financial
impetus of the professionals behind them, that virtually no one breathed a
word of the fact there was no science. In fact, not only were the
over-the-top ideas scientifically implausible, for the scares to be true,
every known law of science would have to be false. (Junkfood Science)
Turnover
— clean sweep of health agency heads - Director of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Julie Gerberding, has submitted her
resignation, effective January 20th. Chief operating officer, Bill Grimson,
will be interim active director.
Her resignation follows that of Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach, the
commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, which will also go into
effect on Inauguration Day.
Dr. Elias Zerhouni has already left his post as director of the National
Institutes of Health and Dr. John E. Niederhuber, director of the National
Cancer Institute, is expected to leave his position, too.
Other health agencies to have new heads will be the Center for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, the Administration for Children and Families, and
the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Tom Daschle, Mr. Obama’s pick to head the Department of Health and Human
Services, has told media he will act quickly to name permanent new agency
heads. (Junkfood Science)
Mass
in Motion - Massachusetts’ Governor Deval Patrick’s Administration
announced the launch of its far-reaching statewide obesity campaign today.
Called Mass in Motion, it includes every conceivable popularized
initiative to reduce calories and increase exercise among residents - in
schools, workplaces and communities. (Junkfood Science)
UPDATE:
Major FDA consumer alert on diet pills - The FDA just issued a
significant update on one of its largest and most serious consumer alerts
about weight loss supplements found to contain potentially dangerous
prescription drugs, some at levels that far exceed even their maximum
recommended dosages.
This week, it added 40 more products that its testing found contained the
prescription drug Sibutramine. (Junkfood Science
Left
to die - It is inconceivable that a nurse would be oblivious to the
fact her patient had not received any fluids or nourishment for an entire
month. A young man, 43 years old, suffered a stroke which made it hard for
him to swallow and he couldn’t communicate to call for help. He laid in
a NHS hospital for 26 days and slowly, agonizingly was allowed to starve
to death. (Junkfood Science)
Do
we really need a national wellness coach? - As a follow-up to Dr.
Sanjay Gupta’s selection for the next Surgeon General comes a compelling
analysis. When the position was originally created in 1870, it actually
had a medical role to administer the Marine Hospital System, which cared
for sick and injured merchant seamen. My, how the role has changed, which
Steven Milloy chronicles in a fascinating article on the history of the
Surgeon General’s job. (Junkfood Science)
Gerberding’s
CDC legacy debated - Director draws praise, criticism from observers
Since President-elect Barack Obama accepted the resignation of the head of
the nation’s leading public health agency last week, her admirers and
detractors have been arguing about her legacy and the future of the
Atlanta-based research facility.
During Dr. Julie Gerberding’s six years directing the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, critics lambasted her, accusing her of
sacrificing science for politics and carrying the Bush agenda on global
warming and other issues into the world of scientific research.
Her defenders countered that she kept the agency above political concerns
and expanded its mission to include bioterrorism research, combating AIDS
globally and responding to national health threats. They say the
government is losing a strong leader who could have provided continuity
for the years ahead.
New administrations often clean house at the top of their agencies.
Gerberding’s resignation, effective Jan. 20, became public Friday. She
was unavailable for comment Saturday.
As the CDC’s first female director departs, some health care advocates
say they hope a change in leadership spurs a change in direction and
priorities for the agency, which employs 9,000 people and has a budget of
$9 billion. (Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
Change4Life:
change we can’t believe in - The UK government’s latest war on
obesity is the most cartoonish public-health propaganda in living memory.
When tens of millions of taxpayer pounds are spent on a public health
campaign, a rational, if naive, expectation is that the campaign is
founded upon the latest and most rigorous scientific evidence. Yet the
British government’s Change4Life campaign, which began airing TV adverts
last Saturday, is both literally and figuratively the most cartoonish
public health propaganda in memory. (Basham and Luik, sp!ked)
Just
another throe in the slow death of science
What is ominous is the ease with which some people go from saying that
they don't like something to saying that the government should forbid it.
When you go down that road, don't expect freedom to survive very long.
– Thomas Sowell
At least the inventors of the second hand smoke scare took the trouble to
arrange a sequence of statistical frauds on apparently real data to back
up their theory. Now it is not considered necessary. Scientific research
has largely been replaced by the sort of vox populi opinion poll that was
once confined to the less intellectually demanding end of the women’s
magazine market. Third hand smoke now exists as a scientifically proven
danger because a “professor” has conducted an opinion poll. No
evidence of old fashioned scientific research is considered necessary, not
even one of those appalling meta-studies. Most “scientific” stories in
the media are now based on results of opinion polls. (Number Watch)
Dark
green - A scientist argues that the natural world isn't benevolent and
sustaining: it's bent on self-destruction
WHEN WE LOOK at nature, it has become commonplace to see a fastidiously
self-regulating system at work: wildebeest trim the savannah grasses,
lions cull the wildebeest herds, and vultures clean the bones of both.
Forests take in the carbon dioxide we exhale, use it to grow, and replace
it with oxygen. The planet even has a thermostat, the carbon cycle, which
relies on the interplay of volcanoes, rain, sunlight, plants, and plankton
to keep the earth's temperature in a range congenial to life.
This idea of nature's harmonious balance has become not just the bedrock
of environmental thought, but a driving force in policy and culture. It is
the sentiment behind Henry David Thoreau's dictum, "In wildness is
the preservation of the world." It lies behind last summer's animated
blockbuster "Wall-E," in which a single surviving plant helps
revive an earth smothered beneath the detritus of human overconsumption.
It underlies environmental laws that try to minimize the damaging
influence of humans on land and the atmosphere.
In this line of thought, the workings of the natural world, honed over
billions of years of evolution, have reached a dynamic equilibrium far
more elegant - and ultimately durable - than the clumsy attempts humankind
makes to alter or improve them.
According to the paleontologist Peter Ward, however, nothing could be
further from the truth. In his view, the earth's history makes clear that,
left to run its course, life isn't naturally nourishing - it's poisonous.
Rather than a supple system of checks and balances, he argues, the natural
world is a doomsday device careening from one cataclysm to another. Long
before humans came onto the scene, primitive life forms were busily
trashing the planet, and on multiple occasions, Ward argues, they came
close to rendering it lifeless. Around 3.7 billion years ago, they created
a planet-girdling methane smog that threatened to extinguish every living
thing; a little over a billion years later they pumped the atmosphere full
of poison gas. (That gas, ironically, was oxygen, which later life forms
adapted to use as fuel.)
The story of life on earth, in Ward's reckoning, is a long series of
suicide attempts. Four of the five major mass extinctions since the rise
of animals, Ward says, were caused not by meteor impacts or volcanic
eruptions, but by bacteria, and twice, he argues, the planet was
transformed into a nearly total ball of ice thanks to the voracious
appetites of plants. In other words, it's not just human beings, with our
chemical spills, nuclear arsenals, and tailpipe emissions, who are a
menace. The main threat to life is life itself.
"Life is toxic," Ward says. "It's life that's causing all
the damn problems."
Ward, a paleontologist at the University of Washington and a scholar of
the earth's great extinctions, calls his model the Medea Hypothesis, after
the mythological Greek sorceress who killed her own children. The name
makes clear Ward's ambition: To challenge and eventually replace the Gaia
Hypothesis, the well-known 1970s scientific model that posits that every
living thing on earth is part of a gargantuan, self-regulating
super-organism.
Ward holds the Gaia Hypothesis, and the thinking behind it, responsible
for encouraging a set of fairy-tale assumptions about the earth, and he'd
like his new book, due out this spring, to help puncture them. He hopes
not only to shake the philosophical underpinnings of environmentalism, but
to reshape our understanding of our relationship with nature, and of
life's ultimate sustainability on this planet and beyond. (Drake Bennett,
Boston Globe)
They still don't get it: Critics
decry Schwarzenegger’s plan to strip environmental rules from highway
projects - SACRAMENTO, Calif. – Efforts to bridge California’s
budget abyss collapsed last week as talks hit a formidable roadblock –
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s demand that long-standing environmental
protections be stripped from 10 big highway projects.
The governor’s aides say his plan would give the financially strained
state a $1.2-billion economic boost and create 22,000 jobs over the next
three years. Environmentalists say the governor is backpedaling from the
heavily publicized push to curb global warming that landed him on magazine
covers delicately balancing a globe on a beefy finger.
Schwarzenegger is proposing that the California Department of
Transportation forge ahead with some construction projects that are tied
up in court over environmental issues. One is a $165-million carpool-lane
expansion on U.S. 50 in Sacramento that a judge has delayed because of the
amount of greenhouse gas emissions it could generate, among other
concerns. (Los Angeles Times)
The fatuous pap that passes for 'environmentalism' is strictly a
luxury good, promptly (and rightly) jettisoned as unaffordable nonsense
in the face of real needs. The sad part is that plain misanthropy,
taking expensive actions of no value to people or planet, is now
considered morally superior and politically correct just because a bunch
of rank loons made a lot of noise and convinced politicians to divert
our taxes to indoctrination campaigns afflicting generations of
children. Get over it! The planet is doing fine and wildlife can only be
affordably preserved by truly affluent societies -- true
environmentalism begins with wealth generation.
Failing State: State
to shut down first and third Fridays each month - California will
close most state offices on the first and third Fridays each month
starting in February, padlocking DMV outlets and other services while
reducing state worker pay to help survive a massive budget problem,
according to a state Department of Personnel Administration memo.
Only offices deemed critical, such as state hospitals and prisons, will
remain open under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's twice monthly furlough
plan. Employees at those state operations will still be required to take
two days off each month at different times. State parks generate revenue
and will not close, but employees will have to take two days off each
month, said Lynelle Jolley, spokeswoman for DPA. (Sacramento Bee)
So, the land of fruits and nuts can't afford to keep its doors
open... How's all that Green rhetoric working for ya?
At least someone is sad to see them go: RIP:
Plenty Magazine Is Actually Shutting Down Everything - As an update to
an earlier article we posted during the week, Plenty Magazine is
apparently disappearing off the map. Through Gawker, we originally heard
that the environmental magazine was going to continue on through their web
presence. However, now new information given to the Razz is pointing to a
full-on liquidation. All staff is being let go without severance and the
website is dying along with the print magazine.
We here at Ecorazzi are saddened to see this happen and hope everyone
involved with what was a kick-ass publication find new work on the
environmental scene soon. Until this is confirmed through an official
announcement, please treat this information as rumor. But since our spy
was just at their offices, we can pretty much bet that this is an
unfortunate reality. (ecorazzi)
PETA's
latest idiotic demand - fish are 'sea kittens' - RADICAL international
animal rights group PETA has launched its most bizarre campaign yet,
demanding fish be renamed "sea kittens".
PETA - People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals - believes calling fish
sea kittens will make sea food less appealing.
It wants to change the image of fish as slimy and slithery creatures by
claiming they are similar to cuter, more popular animals. "Would
people think twice about ordering fish sticks if they were called sea
kitten sticks?" PETA asked on its website. (Daily Telegraph)
Americans'
'SUV eating style' blamed for global warming - WASHINGTON: An US
dietician says that has branded Americans food habits an "SUV eating
style", which contributes to global warming more than the cars they
drive, in her book.
Kate Geagan, registered dietitian in Park City, Utah, refers to a
University of Iowa study that has found that food on average travels about
1,500 miles to reach people's tables. (Times of India)
January 9, 2009
Time for a
Surgeon General-ectomy? - President-elect Obama has reportedly chosen
Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent and one of People
magazine’s “sexiest men alive,” for the post of surgeon general.
Those aren’t the only reasons that the surgeon general’s position
ought to be abolished. (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
OH CAROL, WHAT'S WRONG WITH BEING A SOCIALIST?
Social International Scrubs Obama Energy/Environment Czar from Web Site
-- Socialist International (yes, it is what it sounds like) has scrubbed
from its web site the fact that President-elect Obama's energy/environment
czar Carol Browner is/was an official with SI.
JunkScience reported on January 2 that Browner was a member of SI's
Commission for a Sustainable World Society. Click
here for a multiple-page PDF of the Committee's web page featuring
Browner's photo and bio. (Note: This page is also currently available
by Googling "Socialist International" and "Browner"
and clicking on the cached version of the web page.)
JunkScience now reports that Browner's photo and bio have been removed
from the Committee's web page. Click
here for a multiple-page PDF of the Committee's web page made on January
8.)
If there's nothing wrong with an acknowledged socialist being a top
Obama administration official, then what's up with the mysterious and
Stalinist-like disappearance of Browner from SI's web site?
BTW, SI wasn't entirely successful in scrubbing its web site. If you to
a site search on "Browner" you'll get (at least for now) a vestigal
page indicating her attendance at a November 19, 2008 meeting in
London.
Browner
is an environmental radical – and a socialist (seriously) - No,
it’s not the President-elect, at least not explicitly. Conservatives are
often accused of scaremongering when they claim left-wing
environmentalists are actually socialists hiding behind green disguises.
But with Carol Browner, incoming President Barack Obama’s freshly
appointed Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change – the
so-called White House “Climate Czar” - there is no question about the
socialism. Browner is a member of the Commission for a Sustainable World
Society (CSWS), which is a formal organ of the Socialist International.
Oddly enough, the group’s web site was recently scrubbed to remove
Browner’s picture and biography, but her name is still listed next to
the photo-biographies of her 14 colleagues on the commission. The
Socialist International is no group of woolly-headed idealists. It is an
influential assembly of officials from across the international community
whose official Statement of Principles describes an agenda of gaining and
exercising government power based on socialist concepts. (DC Examiner)
‘Consensus’
in Freefall: Inhofe Global Warming Speech - Senator Presents
Groundbreaking Senate Minority Report of More Than 650 Scientists
Dissenting from Climate Fears - Profiles Left of Center Scientists &
Environmental Activists Who Are Now Skeptics
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of
the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, today delivered a
global warming speech entitled: "Global Warming ‘Consensus’ in
Freefall: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made
Global Warming Claims." Inhofe presented his ground breaking new
global warming report detailing the More Than 650 International Scientists
Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims to Congress on the Senate
Floor.
Inhofe also detailed the growing number of left of center scientists and
environmental activists who are speaking out to reject man-made climate
fears. (EPW Press Release)
It's
Cold Out There - WASHINGTON -- If you are going out anytime over the
next few months, may I suggest that you wear a hat? You might even buy
earmuffs. We are experiencing yet another cold winter. Al Gore may believe
in global warming, but I suggest that he have a word with his fellow
environmental catastrophists at the UK's Hadley Centre for Climate
Predictions. Since the end of 1998 global warming has ceased. In fact, it
is getting colder out there. Two thousand eight was possibly the coldest
year of this young century. Over the last two years temperatures have
dropped by more than 0.5 degrees Celsius -- brrrr.
The reason I mention Al's co-religionists at the Hadley Centre is that
they have come to realize that computer projections of global warming have
been wrong. Carbon dioxide levels have indeed increased but not
temperatures. So bundle up, Al. Last year, in many parts of the world,
snowfalls reached levels not seen in decades. The Associated Press
recently shrieked that global warming "is a ticking time bomb that
President-elect Barack Obama can't avoid," but the facts are
otherwise. The computer models that have predicted global warming have
failed just as the computer models that predicted very few financial
losses for the insurance industry from credit default swaps (CDSs) failed.
(R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., American Spectator)
From the department of ridiculous guesstimates: Sea
level rise of 1 meter within 100 years - New research indicates that
the ocean could rise in the next 100 years to a meter higher than the
current sea level - which is three times higher than predictions from the
UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. The groundbreaking
new results from an international collaboration between researchers from
the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen, England and
Finland are published in the scientific journal Climate Dynamics.
(University of Copenhagen)
More virtual-world twaddle: Floods
to become commonplace by 2080 - Flooding like that which devastated
the North of England last year is set to become a common event across the
UK in the next 75 years, new research has shown.
A study by Dr Hayley Fowler, of Newcastle University, predicts that severe
storms - the likes of which currently occur every five to 25 years across
the UK - will become more common and more severe in a matter of decades.
Looking at 'extreme rainfall events' - where rain falls steadily and
heavily for between one and five days - the study predicts how the
intensity of these storms may change in the future.
Dr Fowler found that across the UK, the amount of rain falling during one
of these extreme events was likely to increase by up to 30 per cent by
2080. This increase is most likely to occur in autumn, winter and spring
when the ground is already saturated, posing the biggest threat of
flooding. (Newcastle University)
Peter
Foster: Climate rains on Aussie drought - Tim Flannery’s apocalyptic
global warming projections have proved way off
There are signs that some climate change skepticism — or at least
greater objectivity — is at last stirring within the CBC, although the
corporation still has a long way to go.
On Monday and Tuesday, as part of its “Watershed” series, CBC
Radio’s The Current aired two documentaries, one on the decade-long
Australian drought, “the Big Dry,” and the other on the alleged plight
of the Pacific islands of Vanuatu, which might be dubbed “the Big
Wet.”
The Australian segment gave a good deal of airtime to Down Under’s
foremost alarmist, Tim Flannery, author of the best-selling Weather Makers
and 2008 “Australian of the Year.” It suggested that the current
drought, unlike many previous ones, “doesn’t seem to be ending.”
Professor Flannery indicted government inertia and even suggested
analogies with Alberta, where the locals were allegedly proving slow to
realize they shouldn’t be digging up the tar sands.
All depressingly typical so far. But then, yesterday, The Current returned
to the issue after a correspondent informed them that many parts of
Australia had recently, and joyfully, been inundated with rain! Meanwhile,
the program also acknowledged a recent column titled “Top 10 dud
predictions,” by an Australian journalist, Andrew Bolt, which pointed
out that Professor Flannery’s apocalyptic projections had proved way,
way, off. (Peter Foster, Financial Post)
Continuing setbacks
for NOAA / NASA solar cycle 24 prediction - Updating my 30 October
post. “Hard lesson about solar realities for NOAA / NASA”
December provisional RI sunspot number from the Belgian group SIDC (World
Data Center for the Sunspot Index) has come in at 0.8. (Warwick Hughes)
The
new NASA solar goalpost: Cycle 24, maybe not so big - A few days ago I
wrote in State of the Sun for year end 2008: all’s quiet on the solar
front - too quiet that “No new cycle 24 predictions have been issued by
any solar group (that I am aware of ) in the last couple of months.”
Coincidentally and shortly after that, NASA’s David Hathaway updated his
solar prediction page here. He’s made a significant backtrack over
previous predictions, and now for the first time he is claiming cycle 24
will be less than cycle 23, not greater. (Watts Up With That?)
UAH
is out, like RSS it is down a bit - Although the webserver file for
the UAH dataset has not been updated yet, the man who is “in the know”
because he’s a major part of the process has released the December UAH
global lower troposphere temperature anomaly value. It is 0.18°C down
from .254°C the previous month. (Watts Up With That?)
Climate
Deniers Gin Up Unscrupulous Science - Climate deniers are out in
force. (Bob Doppelt, Statesman Journal)
Translation: some people have noticed it's cold.
An
Inconvenient HuffPo Item - A reader writes to note that, after
yesterday’s outrage of a voice of reason — er, “rambling . . .
denial” — gracing its pages, the Huffington Post “could NOT allow
Mr. Ambler to go on so (so, they had to denigrate HIM),” citing this
example of HuffPo siccing someone else to go after the gent, and quite
personally. (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Melting
Greenland ice “will drown coastlines” - The scare: In early
January 2008, Stephen Schneider, a biologist turned climatologist, put up
a blog posting to say that “We cannot pin down whether sea levels will
rise a few feet or a few meters in the next century or two”; that there
is a “potential for up to 7 meters of sea-level rise stored as ice on
Greenland”; that “Greenland is apparently melting at an unprecedented
rate, and way faster than any of our theories or models predicted”; that
“mounting evidence from ice cores says probably there is unprecedented
melting going on right now”; that “another decade or two of such
scientifically-documented acceleration of melting could indeed imply we
will get ... meters of sea-level rise”; that “another 5 meters of
potential sea level rise lurks ... in West Antarctica”; and that “this
is a gamble with Laboratory Earth that we can’t afford to lose.”
(Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
Global
warming: Al Gore's convenient untruth freezes over - You have to wrap
up well against this global warming. Over the past 48 hours the
temperature has fallen as low as -12C in Dorset, with the sea at Poole
Harbour frozen up to 20 yards from shore, and parts of Britain colder than
Greenland. Phew, what a scorcher! Might be a good idea to start up the car
(if it will start) and pump some more CO2 into the atmosphere before we
freeze to death. What did the media warn us about climate change?
"There is very important climatic change going on right now, and it's
not merely something of academic interest. It is something that, if it
continues, will affect the whole human occupation of the earth - like a
billion people starving. The effects are already showing up in a rather
drastic way."
That apocalyptic warning came from Fortune magazine - in 1974, when it was
alerting readers to an imminent new Ice Age. By 2006 it had conformed to
the latest fashion and had revised its doomsday scenario to: "The
media agrees with the majority of scientists: global warming is here. Now,
what to do about it?" So much for the media as climatic arbiter.
(Gerald Warner, Daily Telegraph)
Global
Warming Horror Flick Put on Ice - How embarrassing is it when you
produce a horror movie based on global warming and when the time comes to
release it, the planet is experiencing some of the coldest weather in
decades? Such is the case with The Thaw starring Val Kilmer. Filmed in
Canada last summer, it should be ready for release by now but even though
the trailer has been produced, no specific release date has been
announced. Perhaps the producers realize how much of a laughingstock this
movie would become if a movie based on the premise of global warming were
released when their potential audience is freezing. (NewsBusters)
Sticker
Shock - California is now requiring all cars sold in the state to
display a sticker listing its greenhouse gas rating. Calculated by magic,
it's supposed to fight global warming. Did they see the snow in Malibu?
Forget about considering a car's MPG rating in deciding which one to buy.
Next to it will be a new and (in some eyes) far more important sticker
providing the car's GHG rating, an arbitrarily concocted measure of its
greenhouse gas contribution to climate change.
Assembly Bill 1228 requires a sticker displaying a rank comparing
"the emissions of global warming gases from all vehicles of the same
model year sold in the state" be affixed to all vehicles. As if
Detroit didn't have enough to worry about.
The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being a beast on wheels
emitting an excess of 520 "CO2-equivalent grams per mile" and 10
given to those vehicles that emit less than 200. What is a
"CO2-equivalent gram," you ask? We're not sure either. (IBD)
Far
too much hot air - Green rhetoric is irrelevant to addressing global
warming
ON this midsummer morning, it is easy to assume facts in the climate
change debate are as obscure as shimmering objects in a heat haze. Last
month, environmental activists denounced the Rudd Government's greenhouse
gas reduction targets as a defeat for the environment and a win for
anti-earth industries. A guaranteed 5 per cent emissions cut by 2020 was
not enough, they said, and the plan to issue free emission trading scheme
permits to industries only licensed the worst polluters. They were backed
up yesterday by NASA scientist James Hansen, who called conventional
coal-fired power plants "factories of death" and condemned the
coal export industry. For good measure, he warned that Australia's
emission targets were far too low and our reliance on the mineral
guaranteed destruction of much of the life on the planet. But according to
Brendan Pearson from the Minerals Council of Australia, what Professor
Hansen missed is that in a global context, Australia's emissions are
marginal compared to what China pumps into the atmosphere. And writing in
The Australian this morning Mr Pearson also argues that the Rudd
Government's ETS and emissions target will be bad both for business and
the economy in general. (The Australian)
ETS
bites off more than we can chew - "More than at any other time in
history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter
hopelessness. The other to total extinction. Let's pray we have the wisdom
to choose correctly."
FOR some observers, this extract from Woody Allen's "Speech to the
graduates", first published in The New York Times in 1979, might sum
up the debate over the white paper on an emissions trading scheme.
On the one hand, the white paper has been widely condemned by
environmental NGOs well-practised in hyperbole and ambit claims. On the
other, business groups, including my own, have warned that the ETS, in the
form proposed in the white paper, will cost jobs, investment and
competitiveness. Some have been tempted to surmise that this means the
Government has charted an appropriate middle path.
But this is a lazy and cartoonish view of the challenges of sensible
policymaking. Leadership and sound policymaking takes more than running a
figurative tape measure between the two poles of a policy debate.
That is especially the case where one end of the spectrum is populated by
a cheer squad of enthusiasts whose analysis is uninhibited by economic and
practical realities, including the impact on the living standards of
average Australians.
The truth is that the proposed ETS is neither cautious nor a middle path.
(Brendan Pearson, The Australian)
Tim Curtin shafts
the Garnaut Report - You can go to the Quadrant front page and read
Tim’s dissection of Garnaut.
The contradictions of the Garnaut Report - Tim Curtin, January-February
2008
The Report makes many dire projections for the future, including the claim
that without drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, chiefly
carbon dioxide, there will by 2100 be major declines in gross domestic
product (GDP) across the globe … The Report offers no evidence for such
effects having already become apparent despite the warming temperatures
experienced globally and in Australia since 1976. On the contrary, that
whole period has seen the fastest economic growth ever recorded across
almost the whole globe, and Australia is no exception.
If his main article should go offline, I have archived it here. (Warwick
Hughes)
China
aims to increase coal production by 30pc by 2015 - CHINA is aiming to
increase its coal production by about 30 per cent by 2015 to meet its
energy needs, the Government has announced, in a move likely to fuel
concerns over global warming.
Beijing plans to increase annual output to more than 3.3 billion tonnes by
2015, said Hu Cunzhi, chief planner of the land and resources ministry.
That is up from the 2.54 billion tonnes in produced 2007, according to the
ministry.
Figures for 2008 have not yet been released. (Agence France-Presse)
Oh dear... Half
of world's population could face climate-induced food crisis by 2100 -
Rapidly warming climate is likely to seriously alter crop yields in the
tropics and subtropics by the end of this century and, without adaptation,
will leave half the world's population facing serious food shortages, new
research shows.
To compound matters, the population of this equatorial belt - from about
35 degrees north latitude to 35 degrees south latitude - is among the
poorest on Earth and is growing faster than anywhere else.
"The stresses on global food production from temperature alone are
going to be huge, and that doesn't take into account water supplies
stressed by the higher temperatures," said David Battisti, a
University of Washington atmospheric sciences professor.
Battisti is lead author of the study in the Jan. 9 edition of Science. He
collaborated with Rosamond Naylor, director of Stanford University's
Program on Food Security and the Environment, to examine the impact of
climate change on the world's food security. (University of Washington)
Science
Fiction Down on the Farm - The January 9th, 2008 issue of Science, the
official publication of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, contains a remarkable article by University of Washington
atmospheric scientist David Battisti and Stanford co-author Rosamond
Naylor. Science reputedly is the world’s most prestigious refereed
science journal in the world. (WCR)
National
Phenology Network - An Update January 2009 - I was pleased to be
involved with a small role in the establishment of the National Phenology
Network (e.g. see and see). The father of the Network is the
internationally very well-respected scientist Joseph M. Caprio of Montana
State University who initiated lilac phenological research in the USA (for
more on the history of this Network, see).
This is a very important addition to the monitoring of the climate system.
(Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Eye-roller: Can
Nitrogen Be Used to Combat Climate Change? - Excess nitrogen mitigates
carbon dioxide's effects--but with considerable risk, scientists say
LANSING, Mich.—After more than a decade of research, a team of
scientists has found that by releasing one pollutant into the environment,
we might help capture another. Findings from one of the National Science
Foundation's longest-running studies show that adding nitrogen to soil
prompts northern hardwood forests to absorb more heat-trapping carbon
dioxide.
As the atmosphere's most abundant element, nitrogen plays a significant
role in ecosystems, and one to which scientists and policymakers are
paying greater attention. Growing evidence suggests that as humanity pumps
more nitrogen into the environment, forests could become bigger carbon
sinks and help mitigate climate change. But experts warn that it's a
dangerous experiment that could have serious consequences. (SciAm)
Atmospheric carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but an essential trace
gas, regardless of the nonsense espoused by Al Gore and his backing band
of gorebull warming hysterics.
Faster
nitrogen cycling may alter vegetation - One of the lesser known
consequences of global warming is an increased rate of nitrogen cycling.
New research shows that this imbalance may cause a dramatic change in the
vegetation of sub-Arctic environments, with deciduous trees such as birch
replacing evergreen trees.
In some areas this change is already visible. "We have seen this in
Alaska over the last 30 years, where there are lots more deciduous trees
and fewer evergreen," Rien Aerts, from the Free University of
Amsterdam, told environmentalresearchweb. "I’m convinced that this
is due to warming." (ERL)
Obama's
green energy plans build hopes, skepticism - WASHINGTON - Proponents
of alternative energy and energy efficiency were elated on Thursday by
President-elect Barack Obama's economic stimulus speech, but some analysts
warned his energy agenda could hit turbulence in Congress or from the slow
economy.
Obama asked Congress "to act without delay" to pass legislation
that included doubling alternative energy production in the next three
years and building a new electricity "smart grid."
He said he also planned to modernize 75 percent of federal buildings and
improve energy efficiency in 2 million homes to save consumers billions of
dollars on energy bills. (Reuters)
A
$2 trillion bet on powering America - The stimulus plan might
jump-start new energy investments, which could drastically change how we
use electricity. (Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney.com)
Exxon CEO Doubts
Obama's Alternative Energy Goal - WASHINGTON - Exxon Mobil CEO Rex
Tillerson said on Thursday it would be difficult to meet President-elect
Barack Obama's goal to significantly boost U.S. alternative energy
production.
In a speech at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, Obama said he
wanted the United States to double its output of alternative energy
sources during the next three years as part of his plan to revive the
American economy.
"I think that's going to be very challenging to do," Tillerson
told reporters following a speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center in
Washington.
He said the United States will not be able to double biofuels output
during that period and there was not enough manufacturing capacity to
build the wind turbines needed to meet Obama's goal. (Reuters)
ExxonMobil:
Global energy demand to rise 1.2%/year to 2030 - HOUSTON, Jan. 7 --
ExxonMobil Corp. expects global energy demand to increase by an average
1.2%/year during 2005-30, even assuming major energy efficiency gains.
Driven by growing populations and expanding economies, global demand is
expected to increase to 310 million b/d of oil in 2030 from the equivalent
of 229 million b/d in 2005.
ExxonMobil's latest annual "Outlook for Energy: A View to 2030"
was expanded to include an examination of improved energy efficiency,
development of all viable forms of energy, climate risk technology, and
public policy. (Oil & Gas Journal)
D'oh! It just gets worse and worse: Waxman
Cleaning House in Energy Committee - It was no mystery that Rep. Henry
Waxman (D-Cal.) was intent on making environment-friendly changes when he
swept the chairmanship of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee
from beneath auto-friendly Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) in November. And
this week, that house-cleaning began in earnest.
In a reshuffling that will remove several Dingell allies from key
environmentally sensitive posts, Waxman melded two E&C subcommittees
— the Energy & Air Quality panel and the Environment & Hazardous
Materials panel — to form the Energy and Environment subcommittee, of
which Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) will be the chairman, the Boston Globe
reported today.
Markey, who also heads the House committee on energy independence and
global warming, has long been among the most fervent congressional
environmentalists, pushing for increased fuel efficiency standards and
protection of the Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, among a long
list of pet causes. (Washington Independent)
Group
asks coal officials to clear air - FAIRBANKS - An environmental group
is asking for greater transparency in discussions between a state
authority and two electric utilities on the future of the Healy Clean Coal
Plant.
Trustees for Alaska, a nonprofit public interest law firm that takes on
environmental issues, sent a letter to the Alaska Industrial Development
and Export Authority on Jan. 2 on behalf of the Northern Alaska
Environmental Center, Sierra Club Alaska Chapter and Homer Electric
Members Forum. (Daily News-Miner)
States
of emergency declared across Europe over gas - Governments across
Europe declared states of emergency and ordered factories to close as
Russia cut all gas supplies through Ukraine yesterday in their worsening
dispute over unpaid bills.
José Manuel Barroso, the European Commission President, accused the two
countries of taking the EU’s energy supply “hostage” amid a cold
snap across the Continent, and urged them to reopen the pipelines
immediately.
Schools and factories were closed and trees were felled to keep home fires
burning after Russia turned off the gas taps to more than a dozen
countries. It was a clear demonstration of the dependence of the Continent
on Russian gas supplies.
Despite temperatures as low as minus 27C and the threat of heating cuts to
millions of households, Moscow said that it had no choice but to cease
supplies because Ukraine, the country through which 80 per cent of Russian
gas bound for Europe flows, had closed its pipelines. The claim was denied
by Kiev. (The Times)
Gas 'secure' but
prices increase - Energy Minister Ed Miliband has said UK gas supplies
are secure despite the continuing gas wrangle between Russia and Ukraine
reducing supply to Europe. But he told the BBC the longer the dispute
lasted, the greater the risk that prices would continue to rise. (BBC)
WWF
Turns Against Natural Gas Amid Russia-Ukraine Crisis - Earlier this
week I posted a comment on the implications for environmental policy
stemming from the dispute between Russia and Ukraine that has halted gas
deliveries to Europe.
I said the dispute – which worsened Wednesday – would give
policymakers and environmental campaigners more ammunition to speed up the
transformation away from fossil fuels of any kind, including cleaner
burning ones like natural gas.
Sure enough, on Wednesday, the prominent environmental group WWF issued a
statement from its European Policy Office that retracted much of its
previous support for natural gas as a fuel of choice for industrial
countries making a transition to a low-carbon economy. (James Kanter, New
York Times)
Gas Row May
Trigger New Look At German Nuclear - FRANKFURT - Germany must reassess
its nuclear phase out plan as this week's Russian gas supply crisis has
highlighted the need for a fresh look at all its energy options, analysts
say.
Fresh doubts over the reliability of its mighty energy partner, Russia,
will force Europe's biggest economy to try to reduce its future exposure
to spats between Russia and Ukraine over transits, which are causing
disruptions to European supply.
German decision makers, who are usually faithful energy partners to
Russia, need to present more independent scenarios including a
reconsideration of plans to shut nuclear reactors. (Reuters)
Squaring
off over proposed nuclear power plants - COLUMBIA — Conservationists
and business leaders are taking sides as the state’s utilities pitch
several new power plants, both coal- and nuclear-powered.
Some business officials support all efforts to increase electricity
production in the state, which one industry expert says could need to be
tripled in the next 10 years.
Others, however, favor the nuclear option over the $1.25 billion
coal-fired plant state-owned utility Santee Cooper wants to build in
Florence County.
Some environmentalists are opposing both, saying South Carolina utilities
have not scratched the surface of conservation and alternative energy
methods that could reduce the need for another generating plant. Some
conservation groups oppose the coal plant, but not the nuclear plant.
(Associated Press)
Kyushu
Electric to Spend $5.9 Billion on New Reactor -- Kyushu Electric Power
Co., the monopoly power supplier to Japan's southwestern island of Kyushu,
will spend 540 billion yen ($5.9 billion) to build a third nuclear reactor
at its Sendai station.
The Fukuoka City-based utility today submitted a proposal to the
governments of Satsuma Sendai City and Kagoshima Prefecture, the company
said in a statement filed to the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Construction of the
1,590-megawatt reactor is slated to begin in 2013 and operations will
start by March 2020.
Kyushu Electric wants nuclear power to account for about half of its
output, compared with 41 percent in the year ended March 2008. Japan, the
world's third-biggest oil consumer, is boosting nuclear power generation
to strengthen security of energy supplies and reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases. (Bloomberg)
Geothermal
project finds new potential energy source - A routine drilling
operation for a geothermal power plant on Big Island, Hawaii encountered
dacite magma at a depth of 2.5 km. This is the first contact with magma
beneath the surface of the Earth – the finding could ultimately lead to
the exploitation of the molten rock as an energy source. (ERL)
Even ET hates the rotten things, eh? UFO
hits wind turbine - A WIND turbine stood wrecked yesterday with one of
its giant 65ft blades torn off — after it was hit by a UFO. (The Sun)
Actually this has to take the cake as far as excuses for wind failing
to deliver electrickery goes.
Crist's
energy policy for Florida is made of pixie dust - In 2001, Dick Cheney
met with the dark lords of fossil fuel to concoct an energy policy.
In 2006, Charlie Crist met the enlightened greenies of global warming to
concoct an energy policy.
I don't know which is worse.
One relies on dirty dead dinosaurs and the other on magic pixie dust.
Alas, it is very expensive pixie dust.
But the greenies don't care because they are on a mission to save the
planet, and how can you put a price tag on that?
And now they have a governor who, recognizing the political payoff in
battling carbon, is one with them.
They collaborated with his Action Team on Energy and Climate Change to
produce a glowing report on Crist's energy policies. These include a goal
of getting 20 percent of our energy from renewable sources by 2020.
20 percent by 2020.
Our energy policy is based on a slogan.
It certainly isn't based on reality. Neither is the action team's
calculation that the policy somehow would save the state $28 billion.
The staff of the Public Service Commission has taken a more serious look
at the fiscal impact. And it says we could be paying surcharges of 10
percent or more on our electric bills in the next decade.
Don't misunderstand me. I'm a longtime greenie who often has supported
plundering your wallet to make this world a better place.
But doing so has to make sense. And this does not. (Mike Thomas, Orlando
Sentinel)
EEA:
Soaring transport demand holds back low-carbon economy - Transport's
carbon footprint is hampering the development of a low-carbon economy,
according to the European Environment Agency (EEA), which wants political
action to be taken to address soaring demand for transport spurred by
sectors as diverse as food and education as well as business and leisure
travel.
Despite scientific advances in alternative fuels and energy efficiency,
CO2 emissions for the European transport sector are continuing to increase
and remain a key challenge in creating a low-carbon economy, found an EEA
reportPdf external on the external drivers of transport demand. (EurActiv)
Color prejudice rears its ugly head: No
tax for green cars - TOKYO, JAPAN - TOKYO'S local government, seeking
to fight global warming, said on Thursday it planned to exempt taxes on
next-generation green vehicles such as electric cars and plug-in hybrids
once they hit the market.
Japanese automakers are aiming to put out electric cars - which emit no
carbon blamed for global warming - as early as this year despite the
global slowdown that has battered the auto industry.
Some automakers are also working on plug-in hybrid cars powered by petrol
and electricity and are rechargeable at a power outlet at home, letting
motorists drive longer distances. (AFP)
As
seen on TV — our new Surgeon General
The Surgeon General serves as America’s chief health educator by
providing Americans the best scientific information available on how to
improve their health and reduce the risk of illness and injury. —
Office of the Surgeon General website
The Nation’s new Surgeon General appears to have been selected. He has
been told that wellness, fitness and obesity will be the top priorities
for the next four years, according to CNN. Nothing better illustrates the
wisdom of politicians making healthcare decisions on our behalf than this
appointment.
The Wall Street Journal blog downplayed the significance of this
appointment, saying the Surgeon General is “largely a talking head”
whose real job is to travel around the country, “using the title as a
bully pulpit to advance a public health agenda.” If the writer was
mocking the credibility of the office and the public health agenda, it was
lost on most WSJ readers. So was, it seems, the science. But among all the
commentary, no one has mentioned the science… (Junkfood Science)
Cleansing
diet to better health and slimness? - Can you lose custody of your
children by packing an “unhealthy” lunch or giving them junkfood? Can
a detox diet help make us slim like Gywneth? Do herbal teas, sea algae
wraps from France, and those foot detox patches clear the toxins from our
bodies and keep us healthier? These stories in the news may seem to have
nothing to do with each other, but they have everything in common. The
connection is the DHMO phenomenon.
Before we put the pieces together with a just-released investigation by
scientists in the UK, let’s look at these news stories. (Junkfood
Science)
Study shows
California's autism increase not due to better counting, diagnosis - A
study by researchers at the UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute has found that the
seven- to eight-fold increase in the number children born in California
with autism since 1990 cannot be explained by either changes in how the
condition is diagnosed or counted — and the trend shows no sign of
abating.
Published in the January 2009 issue of the journal Epidemiology, results
from the study also suggest that research should shift from genetics to
the host of chemicals and infectious microbes in the environment that are
likely at the root of changes in the neurodevelopment of California's
children. (University of California - Davis)
Well, if you believe their trends assertions then removing traces of
mercury preservatives from vaccines had absolutely no effect. Bet it
doesn't kill off the vaccine myth though.
Researcher
finds link between age, birth order and autism - MILWAUKEE - In the
largest study of its kind, researchers have shown that the risk of autism
increases for firstborn children and children of older parents.
The risk of a firstborn with an autism spectrum disorder triples after a
mother turns 35 and a father reaches 40. (Boston Herald)
Eurosocialists
insulted by common sense - By the way, a good news in the journalistic
world. The Wall Street Journal becomes the first important newspaper that
praises Czechia for A Prague Spring for Political Honesty.
The European socialists have read the refreshing if not brilliant essay by
the Czech president in the Financial Times,
Do not tie the markets: free them.
Václav Klaus explains that all moments could be called
"exceptional" but this adjective is usually used in order to
manipulate with the people. And he argues that Europe should weaken if not
repeal various environmental, social, health, and other regulations and
"standards".
How did the socialists react? Well, you can guess! ;-) They went
ballistic:
Eurosocialists angrily rejected Klaus' calls. (The Reference Frame)
Tax
reforms target fatty foods, smokers and drinkers - THE man reshaping
the taxation system has been encouraged to help keep the nation healthy by
making consumption bad habits more expensive.
Treasury Secretary Ken Henry will be targeting fatty foods, smokers and
alcohol drinkers.
He is under pressure to address the "flawed" alcohol excise and
create a fat tax when he releases his discussion paper on the nation's
future tax system in July.
The Rudd Government's taskforce charged with developing the National
Preventative Health Strategy has urged the review to force people to live
better lives by making vices too expensive. (Courier-Mail)
Childhood
obesity epidemic a myth, says research - THE rise in childhood obesity
has halted, defying warnings that it is an "epidemic" that is
out of control.
Obesity rates among children levelled off around 1998 and have remained
steady ever since, exploding the myth that children are becoming more
overweight than ever before.
Research by the University of South Australia found the alarming rise in
the percentage of children who were overweight or obese recorded through
the 1980s and much of the 1990s had stalled. (The Australian)
How Bed Bugs
Outsmart the Chemicals Designed to Control Them -- Bed bugs, once
nearly eradicated in the built environment, have made a big comeback
recently, especially in urban centers such as New York City. In the first
study to explain the failure to control certain bed bug populations,
toxicologists at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Korea’s
Seoul National University show that some of these nocturnal blood suckers
have developed resistance to pyrethroid insecticides, in particular
deltamethrin, that attack their nervous systems. (PhysOrg.com)
DDT, however, is quite effective...
A loony
new year - This time last year, we disposed of our refuse weekly in a
modest plastic bag. Now, behind our little house we have this:
There are three bins and a crate. The total volume of these is at least
fifteen times that of our previous plastic bag. For the green one (garden
refuse) we have to pay extra and sign a multi-clause contract that
basically asserts that we have no rights. There are now four different
refuse trucks belching out the dreaded carbon dioxide, as well as real
pollution. They all come at different times according to a schedule that
makes the ecclesiastic calendars look like the times-two table.
Elderly and disabled people find it a total nightmare. They live in fear
of getting a criminal record if they do it wrong. Little old ladies are
trying to master shunting theory and going out in the dark and at sub-zero
temperatures, hoping to get the right bin out on the right time of the
right day. In preparation they are carefully washing out cans, bottles
etc. hoping they will put them in the right bin before the snoopers come.
This is now the Wiltshire Experience.
It is all compulsory religious observance and sacrifice. Just to rub in,
we now find that the material is not being recycled at all. (Number Watch)
…Unless
You’re Filthy Stinking Rich - You can just imagine the editorial
meetings that led up to BBC2 commissioning It’s Not Easy Being Green:
BBC executives: This grass-roots environmental movement is all very well,
but we’re never going to save the planet if the middle classes don’t
join the revolution. We need to make environmentalism inclusive.
So they hire Lieutenant-Colonel Richard Francis “Dick” Strawbridge MBE
and his awfully nice family to host the show and give it some grass-roots
street-cred by hiring rock-chick Lauren Laverne (who has come a long way
since she described the Spice Girls as ‘Tory scum’) to present a
weekly feature investigating ‘the posh end of the green market’. In
this first episode she explores how to build an eco-friendly swimming pool
for a mere £100k. (Climate Resistance)
Of
winds and waves - As Category 4 Tropical Cyclone Olivia tracked across
Australia’s North West Shelf in April 1996, a wave-measuring buoy
recorded a 22-metre monster passing Woodside Energy’s North Rankin A gas
platform.
It is a long way from the North West Shelf to the shallow expanse of Lake
George, north of Canberra, and windspeeds and wave heights are much more
modest. Yet it is here that Swinburne University of Technology physicist
Associate Professor Alex Babanin and his colleagues are investigating the
powerful but elusive forces that make and break waves in the open ocean.
Dr Babanin and Swinburne colleague Professor Ian Young are collaborating
on the research with physicist Professor Mark Donelan of the Rosenstiel
School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami,
climate modeller Dr Andrey Ganopolski of the Potsdam Institute for Climate
Impact Research (PIK) and metocean engineer Jason McConochie of Woodside.
Funded by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant, the wave
project is developing a mathematical model of the forces involved in
transferring energy from the atmosphere to the ocean – one that should
illuminate how extreme winds spawn waves such as Olivia’s behemoth
progeny. (ScienceAlert)
Environmental group
backs canal for Calif. delta -- A national environmental group
recommended Wednesday that California overhaul its water-delivery system
by building a canal around the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
A report by The Nature Conservancy endorsed piping Sacramento River water
around the delta, which is suffering from degraded water quality and
declining fish populations. The conservancy said a canal could help
restore the region's natural habitat.
It's the first endorsement of the canal by a major environmental group and
provides a boost to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's argument that there might
be a better way to send water from Northern California to two-thirds of
the state residents. (Associated Press)
Displacing
petroleum-derived butanol with plants - As a chemical for industrial
processes, butanol is used in everything from brake fluid, to paint
thinners, to plastics. According to a University of Illinois researcher,
butanol made from plant material could displace butanol made from
petroleum, just not at the fuel pump. (University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign)
January 8, 2009
Brain-freeze causes warmening stories? Big
chill descends on Britain - Schools close as snow and ice cause travel
chaos from Scotland to the south coast
As Britain endured some of its coldest weather for years, forecasters
warned that the next 12 months could bring blistering heat.
Snow blanketed large parts of the country yesterday, causing travel chaos
and giving children in Gloucestershire an extra day's holiday.
While the icy weather is predicted to last until the weekend, scientists
at the Met Office in London and the University of East Anglia said this
year's average global temperature would be more than 0.4C above the
long-term average, which would make 2009 one of the five hottest years on
record. (The Independent)
Wait! You only think it's cold: Despite
deep chill, global warming is still a peril: scientists - A cold front
is sweeping across Europe after gripping swathes of North America last
month, but the deep freeze does not mean the threat of global warming has
abated, caution scientists.
"The major trend is unmistakably one of warming," Michel Jarraud,
secretary general of the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO), told AFP.
"If we look at the trajectory over the last 160 years, it overlays a
large natural variability, and that's what causes confusion."
The cooler weather that was a hallmark of 2008 can be explained partly by
La Nina, a reversal of the phenomenon by which warm waters build up on the
surface of the Pacific, said Jarraud.
"The problem is that people are confusing weather with climate,"
Susan Solomon, a top scientist on the UN's Intergovernmental Panel for
Climate Change (IPCC), said in a recent interview. (AFP)
So,
Why Exactly Should We Give Up? - The alarmists are gaining ground in
their drive to wear down those among the opposition they cannot shout
down, censor, or shut down. Last week — on the heels of Rep. Bob Inglis
and Arthur Laffer calling for reductions in other taxes to offset the
carbon tax they feel is inevitable — the latest to fall was my former
CEI colleague, Jonathan Adler, over on The Corner.
Jonathan has a feature today on the homepage lamenting the wretched choice
of the hyper-political — and, to my mind (and clearly Jonathan’s as
well) highly anti-scientific — John Holdren as (of all things) chief
science adviser. This of course only supports my argument against
anticipatory capitulation on the belief that one can buy peace with this
crowd. (Chris Horner, Planet Gore)
Fred’s
Fearless Forecast for 2009:Continued ‘No Warming"--Nor Much Else -
So here we have them: Obama’s three - Chu, John Holdren, and Jane
Lubchenco. All with sterling credentials - a Nobel laureate in physics, a
recent president of the AAAS, a recent head of the International Council
of Scientific Unions - but with minimal knowledge of climate science,
except what they may have gleaned from reading the IPCC summary. Yet all
three seem supremely confident that they will drastically change US
climate policy. Well, let me be the first with the bad (for them) news:
Within a year or so, they are going to be an awfully frustrated bunch.
My fearless forecast for 2009: Big amount of activity by Congress, with
lots of ‘Cap&Trade’ bills to limit CO2 emissions. Waxman, Markey,
and Pelosi in the House; Boxer, Lieberman, Bingeman, and maybe even McCain
in the Senate. It will take off, but it won’t fly: There is the
prohibitive cost of any real C&T, raising energy prices and killing
jobs—while the economy is in the dumps. There is the horrible example of
the European emission-trading brouhaha, falling apart even as we go to
press. And after ten years, the climate is still refusing to warm. I am
not even considering the threat of a filibuster in the Senate-with
Democrats from ‘fly-over’ states joining Republican opponents of
Cap&Trade. (S. Fred Singer, Ph.D., President, Science and
Environmental Policy Project)
Obama
Warns of Prospect for Trillion-Dollar Deficits - WASHINGTON —
President-elect Barack Obama on Tuesday braced Americans for the
unparalleled prospect of “trillion-dollar deficits for years to come,”
a stark assessment of the budgetary outlook that he said would force his
administration to impose tighter fiscal discipline on the government. (New
York Times)
Could this restrain the Socialists, even a little bit? It'd be nice
to think there is some kind of silver lining...
An Ordinary
Investor Looks at the Coming Decade - It’s a new year, and we must
look beyond the mess of sub-prime mortgages and unfunded auto
pensions—toward the markets where American citizens have to invest their
private capital for the next decade.
... But now the auto recovery is complicated by impending constraints on
fossil fuels, with the radical Carol Browner as White House “energy
czar.” Come to think of it, Obama’s own campaign pledge to make energy
costs “skyrocket” in order to fight global warming is pretty radical
itself.
But the nation is now entering its third straight harsher winter,
triggered says NASA by a shift to the Pacific Ocean’s 25–30 year cold
phase. Only a fool would escalate energy prices in a recession while
global temperatures are trending down.
...
This energy question pervades the investment outlook. U.S. judges are
banning new coal plants while Europe, China and India burn more coal. The
UK has made no decisions on how to replace the upcoming loss of 40 percent
of its electricity--except 7,000 new wind turbines that will produce tiny
amounts of power erratically. (Dennis Avery, CFP)
From
Belgium: New twist on the ‘Gore Effect’ - Jos, one of WUWT’s
readers abroad writes: “It is very cold here in Beligium. This is from
today’s edition of the flemish newspaper ‘De Standaard’:” (Watts
Up With That?)
Excessive Gore-effect: Big
freeze set to continue - Britain's big freeze has intensified as
forecasters warned temperatures would continue to plunge.
Tens of thousands of motorists were left stranded in a record day for car
breakdowns amid chaotic scenes on the roads as temperatures in parts of
the country dropped to as low as minus 11C (12.2F).
In central London, shivering tourists witnessed the unusual sight of the
fountains in Trafalgar Square frozen.
With areas of southern England and Wales set to get colder overnight,
heating bill payouts to pensioners and the vulnerable topped £100 million
as the Government stepped in to help. (Press Association)
Why not... Gore
Declares Victory Over Global Warming - Washington DC-- Former
Vice-President Al Gore hailed the success of his campaign against global
warming at a speech to the National Clown Club today. The flatulent ex-Veep
stated colder global temperatures are a direct results of his tireless
actions to save the world. The fat buffoon even hinted at another Nobel
Prize is in his future, or at least another Grammy.
"I have saved the world, again." smirked Mr. Gore. "When
you look at when we started our crusade in 2001 and compare it with global
temperature declines you will see a direct correlation. We did it!" (TheSpoof.com)
U.S.
Temperatures: 2008 Back to the Future? - The data are just in from the
National Climatic Data Center and they show that for the year 2008, the
average temperature across the United States (lower 48 States) was 1.34ºF
lower than last year, and a mere one-quarter of a degree above the
long-term 1901-2000 average. The temperature in 2008 dropped back down to
the range that characterized most of the 20th century. (WCR)
Inconvenient
Data: The Need for an International Climate Data Registry (.pdf) (Dr.
Eric Loewen, Marshall Institute)
Temperature
Change and CO2 Change - A Scientific Briefing - THE CHIEF REASON for
skepticism at the official position on “global warming” is the
overwhelming weight of evidence that the UN’s climate panel, the IPCC,
prodigiously exaggerates both the supposed causes and the imagined
consequences of anthropogenic “global warming”; that too many of the
exaggerations can be demonstrated to have been deliberate; and that the
IPCC and other official sources have continued to rely even upon those
exaggerations that have been definitively demonstrated in the literature
to have been deliberate. (Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
Scientists take off
on historic mission to measure greenhouse gases that have an impact on
climate - HIAPER, one of the nation's most advanced research aircraft,
is scheduled to embark on an historic mission spanning the globe from the
Arctic to the Antarctic.
Starting Jan. 7, 2008, the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO)
mission will cover more than 24,000 miles as an international team of
scientists makes a series of five flights over the next three years
sampling the atmosphere in some of the most inaccessible regions of the
world.
The goal of the mission is ambitious--the first-ever, global, real-time
sampling of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses across a wide range
of altitudes in the atmosphere, literally from pole-to-pole. (NSF)
Japan To Monitor
Greenhouse Gases From Space - TOKYO - Japan's space agency will launch
a satellite later this month to monitor greenhouse gases around the world,
officials said Wednesday, hoping the data it collects helps global efforts
to combat climate change.
The Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), to be launched on
January 21, will enable scientists to calculate the density of carbon
dioxide and methane from 56,000 locations on the Earth's surface, the
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) said.
The coverage compares with just 282 land-based observation sites as of
last October, said Takashi Hamazaki, manager of the 35 billion yen ($372.9
million) JAXA project.
"To fight climate change, we need to monitor the density of
greenhouse gases in all regions around the world and how their levels
change," he told a news conference. (Reuters)
Australian
military warns of climate conflict - SYDNEY: Australia's military has
warned that global warming could create failed states across the Pacific
as sea levels rise and heighten the risk of conflict over resources, a
report said Wednesday.
The Australian Defence Force (ADF) analysis found the military could be
called on to undertake more security, disaster relief and reconstruction
missions as a result of climate change, the Sydney Morning Herald
newspaper said. (Agence France-Presse)
Amazingly SMH made something of what-if case "if gorebull
warming or any other cause further eroded the lousy economies of already
unstable island states would they become even less stable?" and
incredibly AFP picked it up.
K.Rudd
advertising campaign on climate change cost $13.9 million - KEVIN
Rudd's feelgood advertising campaign on climate change cost taxpayers an
extraordinary $13.9 million, with a massive spend on television and even
magazine advertisements in lads' mag FHM and Cosmopolitan.
Environment Minister Penny Wong has confirmed the true cost of the
campaign, “Think Climate. Think Change” in answer to a Senate
Estimates question placed on notice by Victorian senator Mitch Fifield.
Advertising industry sources had put the cost of the carbon campaign,
which began last July, at about $9 million this year.
But the $13.9 million cost is expected to rise dramatically when the Rudd
Government finalises the design of an emissions trading scheme and
launches another advertising blitz to explain the new regime.
The first advertising campaign was simply to lay the ground for the need
for climate change policy, with little detail in the campaign on what
Canberra planned to do.
For the first time, the Rudd Government has released details of the
spending to parliament, confirming it spent more than $8 million on buying
advertising space alone, with $412,302 in taxpayer dollars paid in
creative agency fees and advertising production costs.
The Government also spent nearly $60,000 on market research, and another
$80,000 establishing a call centre. Website development costs were
$13,050.
“This is an outrageous waste of taxpayers' money to run a very extensive
campaign that offered no detail or explanation of what the Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme will look like nor what impact it will have on
the everyday lives of Australians,” Senator Fifield said today. (The
Australian)
Sea
Level Budget over 2003–2008: A Reevaluation from GRACE Space Gravimetry,
Satellite Altimetry and Argo by Cazenave et al. 2008 - Thanks to Mike
Jonas for alerting us to the following paper; Cazenave et al. Sea level
budget over 2003-2008: A reevaluation from GRACE space gravimetry,
satellite altimetry and Argo. Global and Planetary Change, 2008;
DOI:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.004
The Cazenave et al papers provides independent confirmation of Willis J.
K., D. P. Chambers, R. S. Nerem (2008), Assessing the globally averaged
sea level budget on seasonal to interannual timescales, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, C06015, doi:10.1029/2007JC004517. (see also the Climate Science
weblog on this paper). (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Sea
Level Rise Slows by 20% (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Coal
Creek, Colorado Coop Observing Station Cooling The Last Decade
By Dr. Richard Keen, University of Colorado
I’m the NOAA co-op observer for Coal Creek Canyon, Colorado,
elevation 8950 feet, in the foothills NW of Denver. Here is a graph
of average temperatures for the past ten years. 2008 is by far the coldest
year in the past decade, with an average of 39F.
See larger image here.
That’s full 3 degrees F colder than 2003. Each of the past five years
is colder than any of the previous five years. This is only one station of
the thousands in the NOAA co-op network, but I thought I’d show you the
data before it’s adjusted and homogenized by the usual suspects.
Here’s a photo of the station in January 2007, in the midst of a
record round of snow storms in Colorado.
See larger photo
here. (Icecap)
Accuweather's
Bastardi: Global Cooling Reason for Putin Shutting off Gas Pipeline -
Expert forecaster sees Putin's moves with energy as a power play in
anticipation of global cooling 20-30 years out. (Jeff Poor, Business &
Media Institute)
Russian
Energy Imperialism, Again - If Russia was supposed to shut off the
natural gas supply to Ukraine, why is it that gas was also turned off in
Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Austria, the Czech Republic and Greece? It does
not really matter that gas will start flowing again soon. Europe’s
dependence on a country that is willing -- and especially, is able -- to
push it into freezing cold and darkness, is the crux of the issue. Russia
relishes that role. And the ongoing gas dispute with Ukraine and last
summer’s invasion of Georgia is the modern-day manifestation of Russian
hegemony in what can be called energy imperialism. (Michael J. Economides,
Energy Tribune)
Europe
Pushes for Russia to Resume Gas Deliveries - The European Union is
seeking a deal with Russia and Ukraine that would see the stationing of
independent observers so that gas delivers can resume to Europe. Countries
all across Europe on Wednesday reported dramatic reductions in gas
delivered from Russia. (Der Spiegel)
'The
Pipeline Power Play' - Russia cut off natural gas supplies passing
through Ukraine to Europe on Wednesday, at a time when the continent is
covered in ice with record low temperatures. The gas dispute between the
countries is warming German commentators to the idea of major changes in
the country's energy policies. (Der Spiegel)
Obama Will Decide
New Auto Fuel Efficiency Targets - WASHINGTON - The Bush
administration will not finalize new auto fuel efficiency standards, as it
had planned, due to the industry's woeful financial state, officials said
on Wednesday.
The Transportation Department had intended to complete the regulation
laying out annual mileage targets from 2011-15 by year's end, but will now
hand the matter over to the incoming Obama administration. (Reuters)
Your
Tax Dollars At Work In Bailout Bowl - In America's
ever-more-democratic society, egalitarianism seeps into everything, even
the supposedly severe meritocracy of sport.
So every 7-year-old who has soccer shoes laced up by a parent gets a
trophy just for showing up, and almost every college football team that is
not dreadful is "bowl eligible."
That is why there are 34 bowl games, which is why you might not have
noticed Tuesday's Bailout Bowl (Ball State vs. Tulsa, by the way), in
which you could have seen your tax dollars at work. Or at play. (George F.
Will, IBD)
Hundreds
of Coal Ash Dumps Lack Regulation - The coal ash pond that ruptured
and sent a billion gallons of toxic sludge across 300 acres of East
Tennessee last month was only one of more than 1,300 similar dumps across
the United States — most of them unregulated and unmonitored — that
contain billions more gallons of fly ash and other byproducts of burning
coal. (New York Times)
Groups Seek
Syncrude Charges Over 500 Duck Deaths - CALGARY - Environmental groups
took the first step on Wednesday to convince a court to charge Canada's
largest oil sands producer with the deaths of 500 ducks, an incident that
brought worldwide attention to the ecological impact of the huge energy
resource.
Ecojustice, the Sierra Club and Forest Ethics want Syncrude Canada Ltd
charged under the country's migratory birds act for the incident last
April, in which the ducks were killed when they landed on a toxic tailings
pond.
The green groups said they initiated the rare legal move after becoming
frustrated with delays by the federal and Alberta governments, which
launched investigations last year. (Reuters)
Obesity
Paradox #17 — Fat and risks for premature babies - The first report
of the new year in the Obesity Paradox series is a just-published study
that adds important information to our understanding of why fat pregnant
women have lower risks for spontaneously delivering premature babies. The
fact that doctors have known that fat women are more likely to carry
babies to term may even be news to some. This research has received little
news coverage, but it is information that women and all mothers-to-be
deserve to hear. (Junkfood Science)
Why
big bums are good for you - FAT bottoms are the bane of many women but
scientists believe oversized rears are a sign a woman's health has not
gone pear-shaped.
New research, published in the journal Cell Metabolism, suggests the fat
responsible for producing the pear shape flaunted by celebrities such as
Jennifer Lopez and Beyonce may be active in protecting women from diseases
by releasing certain hormones. (Daily Telegraph)
Too funny: To
climate-change worries, add 1 more: Extended mercury threat - Mercury
pollution has already spurred public health officials to advise eating
less fish, but it could become a more pressing concern in a warmer world.
So suggests a paper that appears in a recent issue of the journal
Oecologia.
Sue Natali, a postdoctoral associate in botany at the University of
Florida and the paper's lead author, compared mercury levels in soils
under trees growing in air enriched with carbon dioxide to soil beneath
trees in ambient air. Carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, has
increased nearly 40 percent since the industrial revolution and is
expected to continue climbing unless power plant and other emissions are
restricted or curtailed.
Natali's main finding: Soil samples from the carbon dioxide-enriched soil
contained almost 30 percent more mercury — apparently because the soil
had greater capacity than soil in today's atmosphere to trap and hold on
to mercury. (University of Florida)
So, a thriving biosphere enriched with slightly more essential trace
gas is more effective at trapping aerial mercury and locking it in
soil... and this is supposed to be a bad thing?
Swarm of
Yellowstone earthquakes doesn't pose risk, scientists say - When you
have 400 earthquakes on top of one of the largest supervolcanoes on Earth,
people pay attention.
And since the day after Christmas, that's what has happened at Yellowstone
National Park. Scientists are seeing what they call a "swarm" of
low-intensity earthquakes - the largest since the 1980s. The biggest quake
had a magnitude of 3.9, below the level that can cause damage.
But the earthquakes have made worldwide news because the park lies on a
giant caldera, the crater of a volcano that scientists say could one day
explode and destroy most of North America and freeze the rest of the world
under a shroud of ash for up to two years.
Still, the latest earthquakes are nothing to fear, said park geologist
Hank Heasler. (Idaho Statesman)
Monsanto Seeks
FDA Approval For Drought-Tolerant Corn - KANSAS CITY - Monsanto Co
said Wednesday it filed for U.S. regulatory approval for what could be the
world's first drought-tolerant corn, a product that agricultural companies
around the globe are racing to roll out amid fears of global warming and
the needs of a growing population.
Monsanto said it submitted its product to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration for regulatory clearance. It is working with German-based
BASF on the project.
The two companies are jointly contributing $1.5 billion to a venture aimed
at developing higher-yielding crops and crops more tolerant to adverse
environmental conditions, such as drought, which has eroded production in
countries around the world in recent years. (Reuters)
Drug from
genetically engineered goats a first - You've heard of making cheese
from goats' milk, but prescription drugs?
In what would be a scientific first, an anti-clotting drug made from the
milk of genetically engineered goats moved closer to government approval
Wednesday after experts at the Food and Drug Administration reported that
the medication works and its safety is acceptable.
Called ATryn, the drug is intended to help people with a rare hereditary
disorder that makes them vulnerable to life-threatening blood clots.
Its approval would be a major step toward new kinds of medications made
not from chemicals, but from living organisms genetically manipulated by
scientists. Similar drugs could be available in the next few years for a
range of human ailments, including hemophilia. (Associated Press)
January 7, 2009
WaPost Writer: Climate
Change Will Lead to US-Canada War (Defcon Five Alarmism) - In
Sunday’s Washington Post, James R Lee suggests that rising temperatures
will lead to a U.S.-Canada conflict over newly exploitable natural
resources. That’s a preposterous prediction if there ever was one.
(William Yeatman, Cooler Heads Digest)
Who
knew? Global Warming causes war too - It's true. You didn't know
Global Warming causes war? It said so right in the Washington Post.
(William Dupray, DC Republican Examiner)
Green
Comes Clean - The global warming alarmist in chief has unveiled the
environmentalists' real objective. And no, protecting the planet is not
their top concern. (IBD)
The
Poorly Physician in a Huff - Just over a year ago, we picked up on a
post at the miserablist blog, Grist, by Professor Andrew Dessler, former
scientific advisor to the Clinton administration. Dessler had compared the
planet’s ’suffering’ from climate change to a child with cancer.
‘Who are his parents going to take him to in order to determine the best
course of treatment?’, Dessler asked. Not to the ‘quacks’ (the ’sceptics’).
Better take the child to the real doctors (the IPCC). (Climate Resistance)
Hmm... Climate
expert hired for Ore. research institute - Washington state climate
scientist Philip Mote, who helped write major reports on global warming,
will head an Oregon research institute focused on climate change.
Mote, Washington's state climatologist, will lead the Oregon Climate
Change Research Institute. The institute is at Oregon State University but
is shared by the statewide university system.
Mote will be a professor in OSU's College of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Sciences.
Mote has led research on climate changes in the Pacific Northwest and was
a lead author of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, which received a Nobel Prize.
The institute will support Oregon's new Global Warming Commission, created
by Gov. Ted Kulongoski. (Associated Press)
NCDC:
the U.S. cool down by 0.49 °F per decade - The National Climatic Data
Center (NCDC) became the first major source of temperature data that has
published its December 2008 figures. As a reader of Anthony Watts' blog
nicknamed "crosspatch" revealed, you can now draw graphs that
include the whole year 2008. Here is one: (The Reference Frame)
Surprising
Return of North Atlantic Circulation Pump - One of the
"pumps" contributing to the ocean's global circulation suddenly
switched on again last winter for the first time this decade, scientists
reported Tuesday (Dec. 23) in Nature Geoscience. The finding surprised
scientists, who had been wondering if global warming was inhibiting the
pump-which, in turn, would cause other far-reaching climate changes.
(Media-Newswire.com)
Scant
Future For Plenty - It turns out Plenty was paying attention to the
wrong climate change: A tipster tells us the environmental magazine laid
off almost the entire staff today after a funding round fell through.
Back in September, Plenty may have foreseen it faced extinction as
advertising cooled. It was trying to cut a funding deal, purportedly with
global-warming evangelist Al Gore. (Given the losses and layoffs at Gore
flagship media property, Current TV, news of the former vice president's
interest should have been recognized immediately as a bad omen.)
But the do-gooder magazine apparently moved far too slowly.
Our tipster said the money from Gore or whoever didn't come through, and
that Plenty editor and publisher Mark Spellun on Monday sacked everyone
save for a skeleton crew of four or five people who will keep the website
going. Which is actually a net positive for the environment, short term,
what with the rescued trees and all. We just wish the likes of Vanity Fair
and the Times Magazine would do the same with their own much more cynical
"green" issues. (Ryan Tate, Gawker)
CNN's
Dobbs on Global Warming Hysteria: 'It's Almost a Religion without Any
Question' - 'Lou Dobbs Tonight' host observes global warming alarmists
cherry-pick facts in climate change arguments. (Jeff Poor, Business &
Media Institute)
Drivel of the day: NASA
tells Barack Obama Australia is destroying earth with coal emissions -
AUSTRALIA'S use of coal and carbon emissions policies are guaranteeing the
"destruction of much of the life on the planet", a leading NASA
scientist has written in a letter to Barack Obama.
The head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Professor James
Hansen, has written an open letter to Barack Obama calling for a
moratorium on coal-fired power stations and the use of next-generation
nuclear power.
In the letter he says: "Australia exports coal and sets atmospheric
carbon dioxide goals so large as to guarantee destruction of much of the
life on the planet." (Daily Telegraph)
And congrats to Jimmy on his qualification upgrade -- who knew?
Don
Easterbrook’s AGU paper on potential global cooling - Don sent me
his AGU paper for publication and discussion here on WUWT, and I’m happy
to oblige - Anthony (Watts Up with That?)
Carbon
Sequestration due to the Abandonment of Agriculture in the Former USSR
Since 1990 by Vuichard et al. 2008 - Thanks to Timo Hämeranta for
alerting us to the following paper!
Vuichard, N., P. Ciais, L. Belelli, P. Smith, and R. Valentini (2008),
Carbon sequestration due to the abandonment of agriculture in the former
USSR since 1990, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB4018,
doi:10.1029/2008GB003212.
This is an important paper but it focuses on just the carbon aspect of the
climate system. It ignores the very substantial effect of the landscape
change on the hydrologic cycle and on the surface energy budget. For
effective climate policy, rather than just a “carbon policy” (see), we
need to move beyond carbon dioxide as the currency of the climate system.
The need to consider the combined effects of landscape change on all
aspects of the climate system was emphasized in our papers
Pielke Sr., R.A., G. Marland, R.A. Betts, T.N. Chase, J.L. Eastman, J.O.
Niles, D. Niyogi, and S.W. Running, 2003: The influence of land-use change
and landscape dynamics on the climate system: Relevance to climate-change
policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Chapter 9 in
Capturing Carbon and Conserving Biodiversity: The Market Approach, I.R.
Swingland, Ed., Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, 157-172.
Marland, G., R.A. Pielke, Sr., M. Apps, R. Avissar, R.A. Betts, K.J.
Davis, P.C. Frumhoff, S.T. Jackson, L. Joyce, P. Kauppi, J. Katzenberger,
K.G. MacDicken, R. Neilson, J.O. Niles, D. dutta S. Niyogi, R.J. Norby, N.
Pena, N. Sampson, and Y. Xue, 2003: The climatic impacts of land surface
change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change
mitigation policy. Climate Policy, 3, 149-157. (Climate Science)
US
agricultural carbon credit market evolving - OMAHA, Neb. -- The main
U.S. market for greenhouse gas credits will soon impose new rules designed
to bolster the credibility of the carbon credits it sells.
After Jan. 30, ranchers won't be able to market their past efforts to
store carbon dioxide in the soil dating back to 2003. Going forward, the
Chicago Climate Exchange will accept only efforts to limit greenhouse
gases related to the current year and future years.
Ranchers and farmers sign up with the National Farmers Union Carbon Credit
Program or another program that bundles many credits together before
selling them on the exchange. Those carbon credits are bought by
companies, cities or others that want to help offset their emissions
because they are concerned about carbon dioxide contributing to global
warming.
The concept of selling carbon credits for action already done in the past
had been criticized because it doesn't necessarily lead to any additional
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Under the new rules, ranchers
shouldn't face as much criticism about getting paid for something they
already did, said Dale Enerson, director of the National Farmers Union
program.
"From here forward, we think it will be more bulletproof in terms of
criticism if you just offer current year and forward credits," said
Enerson, who is based in North Dakota. (Associated Press)
What utter rubbish! There is not nor can there ever be any
credibility in the hot air market because it can never achieve any of
its stated aims.
Astronaut
Jack Schmitt Joins Skeptics - Richard Lindzen, Roy Spencer to address
conference
American astronaut Dr. Jack Schmitt - the last living man to walk on the
moon - is the latest scientist to be added to the roster of more than 70
skeptics who will confront the subject of global warming at the second
annual International Conference on Climate Change in New York City March
8-10, 2009.
The conference expects to draw 1,000 attendees including private-sector
business people, state and federal legislators and officials, policy
analysts, media, and students. (NewsBlaze)
Al Gore says gorebull warming skeptics are akin to people who think
the moon landings were staged so I guess he thinks Schmitt believes he
landed in a studio lot...
Global
Warm-mongering: More Silk from a Pig's Ear - It seems that NASA's
James Hansen, head of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), is
at it again. He just can't let the data speak for itself. In yet another
egregious display of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) arrogance, he
changed the temperature data from 1910-2008 to reflect what is clearly a
cooling trend to reflect a warming trend. (Gregory Young, American
Thinker)
Congrats
to Harold Ambler for scoring a perfect 100 on Daily Kos' "Inhofe
Scale" - A feather in Harold Ambler's cap. (Gore Lied)
Environment
minister Sammy Wilson: I still think man-made climate change is a con
- Spending billions on trying to reduce carbon emissions is one giant con
that is depriving third world countries of vital funds to tackle famine,
HIV and other diseases, Sammy Wilson said. (Belfast Telegraph)
Dimwits!
Those bright sparks over in Brussels have decided to stop you buying
old-fashioned light bulbs - As the Daily Mail revealed yesterday, our
shops and supermarkets will from this week be running down their stocks of
familiar 100-watt incandescent light bulbs, the kind most of us use in our
homes when we need a good light to read by.
Soon it will be hard to find a 100w bulb on sale anywhere in Britain.
After that, all other incandescent bulbs will follow, until by 2012 they
have disappeared altogether - thus ending 140 years of history since an
Englishman, Joseph Swan, followed by the American Thomas Edison, invented
the idea of using an electrically heated filament to light up a glass
bulb.
All this is part of a move by which Britain is leading the rest of Europe
in forcing us all within three years to switch to nothing but 'low-energy'
bulbs, or CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps), which supposedly are going to
help us save the planet from that global warming which has been so much in
evidence in recent days. (Christopher Booker, Daily Mail)
How reliable are
Coral Sea SST (Sea Surface Temperature) data? - There is a discussion
at the Jennifer Marohasy blog, “Sea-surface Temperatures along the Great
Barrier Reef” Posted by John McLean, January 5th, 2009, re recent
research from AIM in Townsville that global warming is harming the Great
Barrier Reef (GBR). The AIM scientists use the UK Hadley Centre SST data
to show global warming is affecting coral.
This got me to take another look at a post of mine on Willis Island in the
Coral Sea, a site that refuses to warm.
[Note here how politicians were running with the pro-warming conclusions,
long before the published paper by De’ath et al is available.]
At the time I compiled Hadley and Reynolds SST data along with lower
troposphere satellite temperature trends for the grid cell 15 to 20
degrees South and 145 to 155 East, which neatly has Willis Is. fairly
central and extends west to the GBR coast.
This graphic shows that the Hadley SST data warms by ~0.75 degrees C while
Willis Island land data actually cools slightly. (Warwick Hughes)
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
Coral
Calcification on the Great Barrier Reef: What has it been doing
lately?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 656
individual scientists from 384
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from New
Zealand's Eastern North Island. To access the entire Medieval Warm
Period Project's database, click
here.
Subject Index Summary:
Tropical
Cyclones (Atlantic Ocean - Global Warming Effects: Intensity): Has
20th-century global warming increased the intensity of Atlantic Basin
hurricanes?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Faba
Bean, Kentucky
Bluegrass, Little
Bluestem, and Sundial
Lupine.
Journal Reviews:
The Medieval Warm
Period and Little Ice Age in San Francisco Bay: Did they really occur?
... and what do the results imply?
The Medieval
Warm Period in China's Tarim Basin: What do we know about it?
A Millennium of
Reconstructed and Simulated Temperatures for Eastern China: What do
they indicate about the relative warmth of the Medieval and Current Warm
Periods? And what does the result imply?
A Millennium of
Climate Change in Western Canada: What was it like?
Climate, Plants
and Fire: A Millennial-Scale Turkish History: How are the three
factors related? ... and what drives the interaction? (co2science.org)
The
Mysteriousness of Cap-and-Trade - In E&E News Daily PM today,
Nancy Pelosi says that the House could pass cap & trade legislation
this year except . . . (Roger Pielke, Jr., Prometheus)
Joe
Gets Suckered - Joe Kennedy was an easy mark for Venezuela's Hugo
Chavez, who promised cheap oil in exchange for Joe's endorsement. But
after a first $100 million, the well went dry Monday. How's it feel to be
had, Joe? (IBD)
Environmental
groups threaten suit over oil shale development - DENVER —
Environmental groups are threatening to sue the federal government to
block plans for commercial oil shale development on nearly 2 million acres
of public land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.
Twelve groups sent letters to Tuesday to the Interior Department and
Bureau of Land Management saying they will sue unless the potential
impacts on endangered species are addressed.
They argue the final plan and rules approved late last year violated
federal law because the agencies didn't formally consult with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. (Associated Press)
Europe
faces energy crisis as Vladimir Putin cuts Russian gas supply - Europe
has been plunged into an energy crisis after Vladimir Putin ordered
Russia's state-run gas company to cut supplies by 20 per cent. (Daily
Telegraph)
Gazprom
slashes supplies to Europe - MOSCOW: Gazprom, the Russian gas
monopoly, halted nearly its entire export of natural gas to Europe on
Tuesday in a sharp escalation of a dispute over prices with neighboring
Ukraine that also underscored Russia's increasingly confrontational stance
toward the West.
Across Europe, supplies of Russian gas stopped in whole or in part. From
France to Turkey, countries reported sharp drops in gas supplies, at the
peak of the winter heating season in a bitterly cold January.
In one sign of the extent of the shutoff, Ukraine's president said Gazprom
intended to halt all shipments that pass through his country, which
account for about 80 percent of Russian gas exports to Europe. Gazprom
said it was continuing to ship about a fifth of its typical exports across
Ukraine, and still supplying via other routes.
Still, with temperatures plunging, European leaders expressed mounting
concern. (IHT)
Russian-Ukranian
gas crisis worsens - Russia's natural gas dispute with Ukraine
worsened, shutting off fuel shipments to Europe for the first time in
three years and driving energy prices higher.
Russia and Ukraine blamed each other for cuts as supplies from OAO Gazprom
through Ukraine plummeted, deliveries to the Balkans halted and Slovakia
declared an emergency. The spat over prices, transit tariffs and debt
caused UK gas to jump as much as 27% and came amid freezing temperatures
across Europe. (Business Day)
Damn fools: Coal
controversy: Minnesota legislation could complicate Great River Energy
plans - The Minnesota Legislature’s passage of clean energy
legislation in 2007 could create difficulties for Maple Grove-based Great
River Energy, which fires up its third North Dakota coal-fired power plant
in 2010.
At issue is whether power generated by the 99-megawatt Spiritwood Station
can legally be used by Minnesota customers of Great River Energy (GRE).
Minnesota’s Next Generation Energy Act prohibits increased emissions
from large power plants that generate greenhouse gases.
Language in the bill states that after Aug. 1, 2009, no person shall
“import or commit to import from outside the state from a new large
energy facility that would contribute to statewide power sector carbon
dioxide emissions.”
The language reflects a move by national and state governments to reduce
emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, to help combat
global warming. (Finance and Commerce)
Saving
lives with coal - There is no such thing as “clean coal,”
environmentalists insist. Burning coal to generate electricity emits soot
particles that cause respiratory problems, lung cancer and heart disease,
killing 24,000 Americans annually, they argue.
It’s the kind of claim that eco-activist Bruce Hamilton says “builds
the Sierra Club,” by generating cash and lobbying clout for his and
similar groups.
It’s also disingenuous, unethical and harmful.
Since 1970, unhealthy power plant pollutants have been reduced by almost
95% per unit of energy produced. Particulate emissions (soot) decreased
90% below 1970 levels, even as coal use tripled, and new technologies and
regulations will nearly eliminate most coal-related pollution by 2020,
notes air quality expert Joel Schwartz.
Moreover, the vast bulk of modern power plant particulates are ammonium
sulfate and ammonium nitrate. “Neither substance is harmful, even at
levels tens of times greater than are ever found in the air Americans
breathe,” Schwartz says.
The alleged death toll is based on speculative links between pollution and
disease, and unwarranted extrapolations from responsible estimates to
levels that grab headlines and prompt contributions.
Coal helps keep American homes, businesses, factories, airports, schools
and hospitals humming, and provides myriad benefits that never get
mentioned by anti-coal factions. Even if we accept these groups’
assertions as fact, the benefits of coal should be considered in any
policy debate – just as we acknowledge (and strive to reduce) motor
vehicle deaths, but recognize the value of transporting people, products
and produce. (Paul Driessen, CFP)
LNG
terminals and pipelines threaten Northwest fish - The December 30th
editorial titled, "Build the Palomar natural gas pipeline"
attempts to rationalize the benefits of the "ambitious project"
by offering cursory arguments of the project's "public benefits"
without truly examining the impact of the pipeline.
The Association of Northwest Steelheaders opposes the Bradwood Island and
Warrenton Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) port proposals because the
subsequent dredging will degrade and eliminate vital salmon and steelhead
habitat in the Columbia River. Further, the siting of pipelines from these
ports to California degrades spawning and rearing habitat in multiple
basins including those for listed fish runs. Finally, ship movement
involves an exclusion zone along the path of LNG ships, eliminating other
boat traffic including fishing.
As a result, the ANWS will take such actions as required to prevent the
construction of these sites, including education, legislation, and court
processes. (The Oregonian)
Electric
Cars and Economics 101 - The big problem with electric cars isn't
technological. It's economic. And one's just as defeating as the other, if
the object is to come up with an electric vehicle that's more than just a
cute plaything for a handful of over-rich Hollywood celebs. (Eric Peters,
American Spectator)
Peter
Foster: Why state R&D flops - Government spending on creating the
green auto sector of the future will do nothing but hold the industry back
(Financial Post)
Universal
healthcare and the waistline police - We risk a nanny state contrary to
American ideals. - Sedalia, Colo. - Imagine a country where the
government regularly checks the waistlines of citizens over age 40. Anyone
deemed too fat would be required to undergo diet counseling. Those who
fail to lose sufficient weight could face further "reeducation"
and their communities subject to stiff fines.
Is this some nightmarish dystopia?
No, this is contemporary Japan.
The Japanese government argues that it must regulate citizens' lifestyles
because it is paying their health costs. This highlights one of the
greatly underappreciated dangers of "universal healthcare." Any
government that attempts to guarantee healthcare must also control its
costs. The inevitable next step will be to seek to control citizens'
health and their behavior. Hence, Americans should beware that if we adopt
universal healthcare, we also risk creating a "nanny state on
steroids" antithetical to core American principles.
Other countries with universal healthcare are already restricting
individual freedoms in the name of controlling health costs. For example,
the British government has banned some television ads for eggs on the
grounds that they were promoting an unhealthy lifestyle. This is a blatant
infringement of egg sellers' rights to advertise their products. (Paul
Hsieh, Christian Science Monitor)
Physical activity
may not be key to obesity epidemic - A recent international study
fails to support the common belief that the number of calories burned in
physical activity is a key factor in rising rates of obesity.
Researchers from Loyola University Health System and other centers
compared African American women in metropolitan Chicago with women in
rural Nigeria. On average, the Chicago women weighed 184 pounds and the
Nigerian women weighed 127 pounds.
Researchers had expected to find that the slimmer Nigerian women would be
more physically active. To their surprise, they found no significant
difference between the two groups in the amount of calories burned during
physical activity.
"Decreased physical activity may not be the primary driver of the
obesity epidemic," said Loyola nutritionist Amy Luke, Ph.D.,
corresponding author of the study in the September 2008 issue of the
journal Obesity. Luke is an associate professor in the Department of
Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology at Loyola University Chicago Stritch
School of Medicine. (Loyola University)
Hollywood
Conservatives Encouraged to Come Out of the Closet - A once-timid
group of social outcasts is emerging from the shadows in Hollywood. If the
past year is any indication, Tinseltown may have to get accustomed to the
loud presence of a growing minority.
After years of silence, conservatives are coming out of the closet.
Andrew Breitbart, the conservative founder of Breitbart.com and author of
"Hollywood Interrupted: Insanity Chic in Babylon," is launching
a Web site he hopes will help challenge the status quo in what he believes
has been a one-party, left-tilting town. Set to debut on Jan. 6, "Big
Hollywood" will be a place where center, right and
libertarian-leaning celebrities and industry-insiders can weigh in on
Hollywood politics, offer film, television and movie reviews, and have an
open forum for political discussion.
"Our goal," says Breitbart, who lives in Los Angeles, "is
to create an atmosphere of tolerance — something that does not exist in
this town." (SE Cupp, FoxNews.com)
Prosperous
New Fear - Before we get stuck into 2009, we missed a spillage from
the festive period that needs mopping up… (Climate Resistance)
A
Notional Trust - Two articles in the Guardian/Observer this weekend
seem to have stretched reports produced by conservationists to effect the
maximum possible alarm. (Climate Resistance)
January 6, 2009
Powerless:
My Week Off The Grid - People complain constantly about energy. It
turns out however, that people will complain even more loudly about a lack
of energy, as I found out last month during a record ice storm here in New
Hampshire. (Mac Johnson, Energy Tribune)
Restore
the Senate’s Treaty Power - THE Constitution’s Treaty Clause has
long been seen, rightly, as a bulwark against presidential inclinations to
lock the United States into unwise foreign commitments. The clause will
likely be tested by Barack Obama’s administration, as the new president
and Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton, led by the legal
academics in whose circles they have long traveled, contemplate binding
down American power and interests in a dense web of treaties and
international bureaucracies.
Like past presidents, Mr. Obama will likely be tempted to avoid the
requirement that treaties must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.
The usual methods around this constitutional constraint are executive
agreements or a majority vote in the House and Senate to pass a treaty as
a simple law (known as a Congressional-executive agreement).
Executive agreements have an acknowledged but limited place in our foreign
affairs. Congressional-executive agreements are far more troubling. They
have evoked scathing attacks by constitutional experts and have been
strongly resisted in the Senate, at least so far.
The framers of the Constitution designed the treaty process with a bias
against “entangling alliances,” as Thomas Jefferson described them in
his first inaugural address. They designated the Senate as the body
responsible to protect the interests of the states from being bargained
away by the president in deals with foreign nations. The framers required
a supermajority to ensure that treaties would reflect a broad consensus
and careful, mature decision-making.
America needs to maintain its sovereignty and autonomy, not to subordinate
its policies, foreign or domestic, to international control. On a broad
variety of issues — many of which sound more like domestic rather than
foreign policy — the re-emergence of the benignly labeled “global
governance” movement is well under way in the Obama transition. (John R.
Bolton and John Yoo, New York Times)
John R. Bolton, the ambassador to the United Nations from 2005 to
2006, is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the
author of “Surrender Is Not an Option.” John Yoo, a deputy assistant
attorney general from 2001 to 2003, is a law professor at the University
of California at Berkeley and a visiting scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute.
Eye-roller: Climate
change gains head of steam - Change is coming, and maybe more quickly
than expected, according to a new U.S. government report.
The collapse of the nation's financial markets, starting in September and
still sending shock waves through the economy, and the presidential
election pushed the issue of climate change off the nation's front burner.
But the problem did not stop to await the election outcome or the economic
bailouts.
In fact, a new report from the U.S. Geological Survey says that previous
estimates of how rapidly climate change may be occurring probably have
been too conservative. In other words, it is happening faster than
expected — and Texas might feel its effects in the form of drought
sooner rather than later.
The study was commissioned by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program,
which coordinates the work of 13 federal agencies. (Austin
American-Statesman)
Yet
another “moment of fateful decision” - The scare: At the December
2008 UN climate conference at Poznan, held during the coldest commencement
of the European winter in 30 years, former vice-president Al Gore said
that the human species had arrived at yet another “moment of fateful
decision”, because “our home, Earth, is in danger”. He said he would
state “a few facts, if only to underscore the urgency of our task”,
and “we cannot negotiate with the facts”, the first of which was the
“unrestrained dumping of 70 million tons of ‘global warming’
pollution into the thin shelf of atmosphere surrounding our planet every
24 hours”. Scientists had “for several years now warned us that we are
moving dangerously close to several so-called tipping points that could
within less than 10 years make it impossible to avoid irretrievable damage
to the planet's habitability”. (Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
"Global
Cooling is really Global Warming" - The scare: On 2 January 2009,
the Wall Street Journal wrote one of a series of articles apparently co-ordinated
throughout the generally alarmist news media throughout the holiday
season, trying to overcome the problem posed for “global warming”
alarmists by the fact that global mean surface temperatures have been on a
downtrend for eight straight years (Figure 1): (Christopher Monckton, SPPI)
NOTED
UK ACADEMIC ECONOMIST TELLS WHY HE IS A DISSENTER - "Where so
much remains uncertain, unsettled or unknown, policies should be
evolutionary and adaptive, rather than presumptive; and their evolution
should be linked to a process of inquiry and review which is more
thorough, balanced, open and objective than is now the case." David
Henderson, former Head of Economic and Statistics Dept of OECD, now
Visiting Professor at University of Westminster, tells Edinburgh students
why he disagrees with the policy processes of IPCC and many governments. LINK
to download 18-page pdf (NZ Climate Science)
50
Years of CO2: Time for a Vision Test - Now that there have been 50
full years of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration monitoring at Mauna
Loa, Hawaii, I thought January1, 2009 would be an appropriate time to take
a nostalgic look back.
As you well know from Al Gore’s movie (remember? It’s the one you were
required to come to English class and watch or the teacher would fail your
kid), we are now pumping 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the
atmosphere every day as if it’s an “open sewer”.
Well, 50 years of that kind of pollution is really taking its toll. So,
without further ado, here’s what 50 years of increasing levels of CO2
looks like on the Big Island: (DrRoySpencer.com)
The
warmaholics' fantasy - THE warmaholics are fond of using the phrase
"official records going back to 1850", but the simple facts are
that prior to the 1970s, surface-based temperatures from a few
indiscriminate, mostly backyard locations in Europe and the US are fatally
corrupted and not in any sense a real record.
They are then further doctored by a secret algorithm to account for
heat-island effects. Reconstructions such as the infamously fraudulent
"hockey stick" are similarly unreliable.
The only precise and reliable temperature recording started with satellite
measurements in the 1970s. They show minuscule warming, all in the
northern hemisphere, which not only stopped in 2000 but had completely
reversed by 2008 (see graph).
The warmaholics also contend that global mean temperature and sea level
rises are at the upper range of the Intergovernment[al] Panel on Climate
Change's projections. Well, no, actually they are not.
Sea level rises since 1900 are of the order of 1-2mm a year, which is
indistinguishable from tectonic movement, and the IPCC computer
projections are simply completely wrong. (Jon Jenkins, The Australian)
Everything's
Cool - We're supposed to be living in fear of our coastal cities
drowning because we refuse to give up oil and the modern machines it
powers. Yet today's sea ice levels match those of nearly three decades
ago.
According to DailyTech blogger Michael Asher, "Thanks to a rapid
rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29
years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close." This isn't
Asher's opinion, but fact based on data from the University of Illinois'
Arctic Climate Research Center.
News about growing sea ice isn't exactly what environmentalists who
predicted the North Pole would be free of ice in 2008 want to hear. Al
Gore and his fellow alarmists have been telling us for years that melting
sea ice and glaciers will dramatically and dangerously increase sea
levels.
In his 2006 movie "An Inconvenient Truth," he needlessly stoked
fear by claiming that global warming could cause sea levels to rise 20
feet "in the near future."
It was one of three dozen misstatements made in the Oscar-winning
propaganda film that was promoted as a serious scientific documentary. (IBD)
And they have such a dazzling accuracy record :) 2009
To Be One Of Warmest Years On Record: Researchers - LONDON - Next year
is set to be one of the top-five warmest on record, British climate
scientists said on Tuesday.
The average global temperature for 2009 is expected to be more than 0.4
degrees celsius above the long-term average, despite the continued cooling
of huge areas of the Pacific Ocean, a phenomenon known as La Nina.
That would make it the warmest year since 2005, according to researchers
at the Met Office, who say there is also a growing probability of record
temperatures after next year. (Reuters)
The IPCC Can't
Count - Author and Reviewer numbers are wrong (.pdf) - How many times
have you heard or read words to the effect that 4000 scientists from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change (IPCC) supported the claims
about a significant human influence on climate? I think I've seen it on
television, radio and the Internet and I know that politicians at national
levels have quoted such figures. There's no question whatsoever. It's
utterly wrong.
In fact, once the duplicated names are removed that number falls below
2,900 and if we only want those who explicitly supported the claims it
falls to only about 60. So how does 4,000 become 60? Let's take a closer
look at the real numbers. (John McLean)
Sustaining
the Unsustainable - How has the scam that humans are causing global
warming worked so effectively? One answer is exploitation of fear, the
technique of which was accurately explained in the late Michael
Crichton’s book “State of Fear.”
Much fuel for the fear was effectively built into the structure and
methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (Tim
Ball, CFP)
Governor
Rendell Announces Mid-Atlantic Agreement to Develop Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Reduction Standard - HARRISBURG, Pa., Jan. 5 -- Pennsylvania
has signed a letter of agreement with 10 Mid-Atlantic states that will
reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation fuels and other
sources by developing a comprehensive, regional low carbon fuel standard,
Governor Edward G. Rendell announced today. (PRNewswire-USNewswire)
First
'World Bank Green Bonds' Launched - January 5, 2009—The World Bank
recently launched its first “green bonds” designed to raise additional
funding for projects or programs that support low-carbon activities in
client countries.
In partnership with SEB, the World Bank raised approximately US$350
million via several key Scandinavian institutional investors. The bond
issue responds to growing interest from sustainable or socially
responsible institutional investors, as well as some individual investors,
who wish to support climate change-related projects in developing
countries. (World Bank)
State
of the Sun for year end 2008: all’s quiet on the solar front - too quiet
- The NOAA Space Weather Prediction center updated their plots of solar
indices earlier today, on January 3rd. With the exception of a slight
increase in the 107 centimeter radio flux, there appears to be even less
signs of solar activity. Sunspots are still not following either of the
two predictive curves, and it appears that the solar dynamo continues to
slumber, perhaps even winding down further. Of particular note, the last
graph below (click the read more link to see it) showing the Average
Planetary Index (Ap) is troubling. I thought there would be an uptick by
now, due to expectations of some sign of cycle 24 starting up, but instead
it continues to drop. (Watts Up With That?)
Uh
Oh, Is Yellowstone's Supervolcano Waking Up? - Oh, man. I noted a few
months ago some evidence that the supervolcano lurking beneath Yellowstone
National Park—a volcano capable of obliterating a good chunk of the
United States if it ever erupted—might be going dormant. Scratch that.
Charlie Petit notes that since December 26, there's been an unusually
large uptick in earthquake activity beneath Yellowstone—some 400 seismic
events in all. Is the supervolcano getting restless? Let's hope not. (The
Vine)
Where
Thermometers Go To Die - How not to measure temperature, part 80 - In
my 30 years in meteorology, I never questioned how NOAA climate monitoring
stations were setup. It wasn’t until I stumbled on the Marysville
California fire station and its thermometer that that I began to notice
just how badly sited these stations are. When I started looking further, I
never expected to find USHCN climate monitoring stations placed at sewage
treatment plants, next to burn barrels, or in parking lots of University
Atmospheric Science Departments, or next to air conditioning heat
exchangers. These were all huge surprises.
I didn’t think I’d be surprised anymore. I thought I’d seen the
weirdest of the weird, and that I would not be surprised again with bad
station placement examples.
Then I saw this station, submitted from Fort Scott, Kansas: (Watts Up With
That?)
EPA
Really Is Serious About Taxing Cow/Pig Emissions - I think most of the
American public still thinks the idea of the government taxing cow and pig
farts in the latest front in the war on global warming is a bad joke. But
it’s not. They’re serious about this, and the expense to ranchers and
dairy farmers is going to be huge if they get their way:
Call this one of the newest and innovative the ways your government has
come up with to battle greenhouse gas emissions. (KXMB)
A
Carbon Tax For Animal Emissions - More Unintended Consequences Of Carbon
Policy In The Guise Of Climate Policy - Thanks to Mike Smith for
alerting us to this news article: New Jersey, Pennsylvania farmers don’t
like the smell of a federal ‘cow tax’ by Bill Wichert on Sunday,
December 28, 2008 in The Express-Times
The article includes the text: “The rear end of a cow could become the
next source of financial hardship for farmers.”
“Facing lower milk prices and higher operational costs, dairy farmers in
New Jersey and Pennsylvania say they couldn’t afford the so-called cow
tax, a suggestion made by federal officials to charge permit fees for
livestock as a way of regulating greenhouse gas emissions.”
“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency raised the concept in a recent
report on possible greenhouse gas regulations under the Clean Air Act.
Those regulations also could be extended to small businesses, schools,
hospitals and churches.”
“In its comments on the EPA proposal, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
said the regulations might force permitting requirements on dairy farms
with more than 25 cows, beef cattle operations with more than 50 cattle,
swine facilities with more than 200 hogs and farms with 500 or more acres
of corn.”
“The permit costs would mean $175 per dairy cow, $87.50 a head for beef
cattle and $20 per hog, according to Liz Thompson, a research associate
with the New Jersey Farm Bureau. A herd of 75 dairy cows would carry a
price tag of about $13,000.”
This is the type of pandora’s box that Climate Science has weblogged on
in the past; e.g. see Has The IPCC Produced A Hydra?
The clear answer is that a wide range of consequences, with serious
environmental, economic and social effects, are going to result as a
result of the inappropriately narrow IPCC focus on carbon as the currency
for a wide range of climate effects. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
LIEBERMAN:
No time for an oil crackdown - How does $8-a-gallon gas sound? Few
Americans would want to see that happen. Unfortunately, President-elect
Barack Obama's choices for the governments two highest energy posts have
expressed a surprising level of comfort with sky-high gas prices.
As if that weren't bad enough, the incoming Obama administration and new
Congress have suggested they may reverse the pro-domestic oil drilling
measures enacted since last summer. It is starting to look as though the
change coming to Washington will bring bad news at the pump in the years
ahead. (Ben Lieberman, Washington Times)
EIA
Predicts Greener America
-Use less oil
-Cut carbon dioxide emissions
-Drastically increase energy from renewables
-Reduce reliance on foreign imports
Sound like an environmentalist’s Christmas wish list? It’s not. It’s
the Energy Information Administration’s latest estimates for U.S. energy
use through 2030. The 2009 version, released on Wednesday, contains some
significant changes from the previous year’s outlook.
The EIA predicts virtually no growth in U.S. oil consumption over the next
20 years. They credit this feat to a combination of events including:
increased automobile efficiency, increasing use of biofuels and a rebound
in oil prices after the world economy recovers from its current recession.
By 2030 they expect the price of crude to be back up to $130 per barrel in
2007 dollars ($189 per bbl in nominal dollars). (Seth Myers, Energy
Tribune)
Shale Gas:
Savior or Treadmill? - In his recent article, It’s a Gas, Gas, Gas,
Robert Bryce correctly notes that the current price collapse and flat --
maybe even declining -- demand for natural gas has caused economic and
financial turmoil for gas producers.
Gas prices are now about 47 percent below their July peak, drilling has
slowed and the financial outlook for many producers is complicated by
tight corporate credit markets and plunging stock values.
While there is no doubt that the US now has huge quantities of
unconventional gas, the key question for the future is obvious: where are
prices going? The technology breakthroughs in shale gas production are
allowing producers to tap huge resources that were previously uneconomic.
But these new shale resources are coming onstream at a time of weakening
energy demand both in the US and the world. And there’s another
wildcard: liquefied natural gas. Two recent reports are predicting
near-record US LNG imports as new liquefaction capacity comes onstream at
the same time that world gas demand is stagnating. All of these factors
are combining to make for a complicated outlook for the US gas business.
(Terence Thorn, Energy Tribune)
Russia Gas
Disruption Spreads To Czechs, Turks - KIEV/MOSCOW - Russian gas
supplies to the Czech Republic and Turkey dropped on Sunday, the latest
victims of a deepening row between Russia and Ukraine over debts and
pricing.
Russian natural gas supplies fell by five percent to the Czech Republic as
a result of the stand-off, which began when Russia cut off the gas to
Ukraine on New Year's day. The two sides blame each other for the dispute.
"It is the first signal of the Russia-Ukraine crisis in the Czech
Republic," said a spokesman for gas importer RWE Transgas.
European energy firms, which received about a fifth of their gas via
pipelines through Ukraine, said they had enough gas stockpiled to maintain
supplies for several days.
But analysts said Europe, where temperatures in many places were below
zero, could face problems if the row dragged on beyond that. (Reuters)
CNPC
Lengthens Turkmen Pipeline As First Gas Nears - Since mid-December
CNPC has started building the eastern section of a long-haul gas pipeline
linking Turkmenistan to China’s Guangdong, bringing the booming province
a step closer to its first gas imports. The gas is slated to begin
shipping in 2009. The pipeline project, one of the world’s largest, is
expected to diversify China’s energy supply and reduce its future
dependence on Russia. (Lee Geng, Energy Tribune)
Ameren
nuclear plan triggers debate over funding - Missouri's largest
electric utility is considering building a second nuclear reactor in
mid-Missouri, and that means lawmakers will be considering how to pay for
it during the 2009 session that starts Wednesday.
The debate hits on energy production, consumer protection, economic
development and environmental concerns. (Associated Press)
Solar
Meets Polar as Winter Curbs Clean Energy - Old Man Winter, it turns
out, is no friend of renewable energy.
This time of year, wind turbine blades ice up, biodiesel congeals in tanks
and solar panels produce less power because there is not as much sun. And
perhaps most irritating to the people who own them, the panels become
covered with snow, rendering them useless even in bright winter sunshine.
So in regions where homeowners have long rolled their eyes at shoveling
driveways, add another cold-weather chore: cleaning off the solar panels.
(New York Times)
Biomass fuels to
the rescue? It is cheap ... and unwanted - MIAMI -- Nobody loves
biomass. When talk turns to global warming and the green movement, it's
hardly ever mentioned. Biomass can be garbage (literally) or wood chips or
sugar-cane remnants or grass.
Still, among energy experts, biomass has some strong supporters, and for
good reason: Right now, virtually all the renewable-energy power in
Florida comes from biomass, including three plants in Miami-Dade and
Broward.
What's more, it's cheap -- cheaper in some instances even than coal, which
is generally considered the nation's least expensive way of producing
electricity but is also the biggest producer of greenhouse gases that
scientists say are heating up the globe.
"We're very strong supporters of biomass," says Stephen Smith,
head of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. "In the short run, it
will be a real workhorse." But he adds: "There are various
shades of green in biomass. Some is better than others." (Associated
Press)
CNOOC In
$2.2 Billion Deal For Renewable Base - China's top offshore oil
producer CNOOC has signed an agreement with authorities of northern
China's Tianjin city to spend 15 billion yuan ($2.2 billion) for building
renewable energy projects.
The company will set up a renewable energy industry base in the city's
Binhai economic zone including a research and development center.
CNOOC initiated its first alternative energy project by building an
offshore wind power station in Bohai Bay where Tianjin is located in
November 2007 in line with the country's policy of significantly boosting
wind power generating capacity in the next 10 years. (Michael Economides,
Energy Tribune)
The
raw milk debate — helping parents wade through the milk science -
“Drink your milk and go outside and play.”
Generations have grown up drinking their milk. It’s long been
recommended as a wholesome source of protein, vitamins, and calcium and
other minerals, for growing bodies and for people of all ages. Nowadays,
milk seems to have become complicated and controversial. Parents hear
sensational claims of special health benefits and potentially harmful
risks about both pasteurized and unpasteurized milk. Trying to decide
which is the safest and healthiest choice for their children can be
impossibly hard for parents, though, without knowing which claims are
based on the best scientific evidence and which ones are fiction.
A paper in the new issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases revealed some
surprising information about the safety and wholesomeness of milk that may
help break through the milky maze. (Junkfood Science)
Sunday
reading: The greatest health risk factor - Economic health is rarely
considered a health index, but, as Dr. Michel Accad, M.D., writes at Alert
and Oriented, it is the most important one. (Junkfood Science)
Vote
for your choice for Best Medical/Health Issues Blog. -- Sandy Szwarc's
Junkfood Science has
been nominated and we like to think you'll support her in voting.
Oh, have we mentioned that Sandy does all she does in her own time, at
her own expense with no sponsorship of any kind? You can help support her
efforts through this donation button:
Support Junkfood Science. What we want you to do is show Sandy how
much you appreciate her dedicated efforts, undertaken at her own expense
(Junkfood Science has no sponsor and never has had). Please donate
whatever you can to help Sandy continue the wonderful work she does.
Click on the button below to show Junkfood Science some love.
Most
covered-up of 2008: Natural-born citizen - WND editors join with
readers to determine the year's top 10
Charges that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. and,
therefore, constitutionally ineligible to serve as president top the list
of the 10 most "spiked" or underreported stories of the last
year, according to an annual WND survey.
At the end of each year, news organizations typically present their
retrospective replays of what they consider to have been the top news
stories in the previous 12 months.
WND's editors, however, have long considered it far more newsworthy to
publicize the most important unreported or underreported news events of
the year – to highlight perhaps for one last time major news stories
that were undeservedly "spiked" by the establishment press.
WND Editor and CEO Joseph Farah has sponsored "Operation Spike"
every year since 1988, and since founding WorldNetDaily in May 1997, he
has continued the annual tradition.
Here, with our readers' help, are WorldNetDaily editors' picks for the 10
most underreported stories of 2008: (WorldNetDaily)
Thousands Protest
Against Indian Tiger Reserve - CHENNAI - More than 15,000 people in
southern India protested against the extension of a new tiger reserve
Tuesday, despite official assurances that they will not lose their homes
to the sanctuary.
Representatives from all parties in Tamil Nadu state, including the
state's ruling party, took part in what is the third such protest since
November against the extension of the Mudumalai wildlife sanctuary, police
said. (Reuters)
Hodge-podge of ecotheology and nostalgia for 'simpler times': A
50-Year Farm Bill - THE extraordinary rainstorms last June caused
catastrophic soil erosion in the grain lands of Iowa, where there were
gullies 200 feet wide. But even worse damage is done over the long term
under normal rainfall — by the little rills and sheets of erosion on
incompletely covered or denuded cropland, and by various degradations
resulting from industrial procedures and technologies alien to both
agriculture and nature.
Soil that is used and abused in this way is as nonrenewable as (and far
more valuable than) oil. Unlike oil, it has no technological substitute
— and no powerful friends in the halls of government.
Agriculture has too often involved an insupportable abuse and waste of
soil, ever since the first farmers took away the soil-saving cover and
roots of perennial plants. Civilizations have destroyed themselves by
destroying their farmland. This irremediable loss, never enough noticed,
has been made worse by the huge monocultures and continuous soil-exposure
of the agriculture we now practice.
To the problem of soil loss, the industrialization of agriculture has
added pollution by toxic chemicals, now universally present in our
farmlands and streams. Some of this toxicity is associated with the widely
acclaimed method of minimum tillage. We should not poison our soils to
save them.
Industrial agricultural has made our food supply entirely dependent on
fossil fuels and, by substituting technological “solutions” for human
work and care, has virtually destroyed the cultures of husbandry
(imperfect as they may have been) once indigenous to family farms and
farming neighborhoods. (New York Times)
What they don't seem to recognize is that the relatively trivial
increase in local productivity achieved by family farming over a
hunter-gatherer existence is but a first step, compounded and improved
by more modern techniques. Selective herbicides and no/low-till
agriculture has been the greatest boon to soil conservation in farming
history.
January 5, 2009
Steel
Industry, in Slump, Looks to Federal Stimulus - The steel industry,
having entered the recession in the best of health, is emerging as a
leading indicator of what lies ahead. As steel production goes — and it
is now in collapse — so will go the national economy.
That maxim once applied to Detroit’s Big Three car companies, when they
dominated American manufacturing. Now they are losing ground in good times
and bad, and steel has replaced autos as the industry to watch for an
early sign that a severe recession is beginning to lift.
The industry itself is turning to government for orders that, until the
September collapse, had come from manufacturers and builders. Its
executives are waiting anxiously for details of President-elect Barack
Obama’s stimulus plan, and adding their voices to pleas for a huge
public investment program — up to $1 trillion over two years —
intended to lift demand for steel to build highways, bridges, electric
power grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants and rapid transit.
“What we are asking,” said Daniel R. DiMicco, chairman and chief
executive of the Nucor Corporation, a giant steel maker, “is that our
government deal with the worst economic slowdown in our lifetime through a
recovery program that has in every provision a ‘buy America’
clause.” (New York Times)
Of course, the greatest help the incoming Administration can give the
steel industry and the economy generally is to scrap climate nonsense
and expunge climate hysterics from the Administration altogether. Then
everyone but the misanthropic lunatics win and cheaply too.
Whopper of the Year
- Talking about the “millions” of jobs that would be created and
forgetting to mention the many more millions that would be destroyed truly
takes the cake. (Julie Walsh, Cooler Heads Digest)
Sorry,
Climate Change Wouldn't Hurt America's Economy - One of the more sober
arguments in favor of radical action to combat perceived climate change is
that doing nothing would be economically calamitous. That was certainly
the conclusion of the controversial Stern Report in the United Kingdom.
Economist Nicholas Stern concluded that we should spend 1 percent of the
global economy every year to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
Now even if you take Stern's numbers as correct—and many think he wildly
overestimates the economic risks of doing nothing—he still advocates
spending $700 billion a year on the supposed problem. Failure to do so
could risk global GDP being up to twenty percent lower than it would be
otherwise.
But a new study from economists Melissa Dell and Benjamin Olken at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Northwestern University's
Benjamin Jones comes to a different conclusion. Yes, they find, global
warming would hurt economic growth, but only in poorer countries. Climate
change would have "very little impact" on wealthier nations.
(James Pethokoukis, Capital Commerce)
In
Obama’s Team, Two Camps on Climate - WASHINGTON — In the fall of
1997, when the Clinton administration was forming its position for the
Kyoto climate treaty talks, Lawrence H. Summers argued that the United
States would risk damaging the domestic economy if it set overly ambitious
goals for reducing carbon emissions.
Mr. Summers, then the deputy Treasury secretary, said at the time that
there was a compelling scientific case for action on global warming but
that a too-rapid move against emissions of greenhouse gases risked dire
and unknowable economic consequences.
His view prevailed over those of officials arguing for tougher standards,
among them Carol M. Browner, then the administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, and her mentor, Al Gore, then the vice president.
Today, as the climate-change debate once again heats up, Mr. Summers leads
the economic team of the incoming administration, and Ms. Browner has been
designated its White House coordinator of energy and climate policy. And
Mr. Gore is hovering as an informal adviser to President-elect Barack
Obama.
As Mr. Obama seeks to find the right balance between his environmental
goals and his plans to revive the economy, he may have to resolve
conflicting views among some of his top advisers. (New York Times)
Obama's Energy Czar a
Card Carrying Member of Socialist Organization - CEI Adjunct Scholar
Steven Milloy just sent around an email reporting that Carol Browner,
President-elect Barack Obama’s new energy czar, is a member of the
Socialist International, perhaps the world’s preeminent socialist
organization. (Cooler Heads Digest)
Obama
will face Bush legacy on environment - WASHINGTON — President George
W. Bush could be forcing President-elect Barack Obama to act almost
immediately to curb global warming, after years of the Bush administration
fighting attempts to crack down on greenhouse gas emissions.
Or, depending on which interpretation prevails, Bush could be giving his
successor much-needed breathing room on a volatile issue.
In its final weeks, the Bush administration has moved to close what it
calls "back doors" to regulating carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases. It barred the Environmental Protection Agency from
considering the effects of global warming on protected species. And it
excluded carbon dioxide from a list of pollutants the EPA regulates under
the Clean Air Act.
Environmentalists call the moves a last-minute attempt to block speedy,
executive action by the president's successor on climate change, an issue
that Obama calls a top concern. But they say it could backfire, by
prompting lawsuits and fueling fights over coal-fired power plants that
the new administration would need to resolve quickly. (Chicago Tribune)
Bjorn
Lomborg: Obama’s options on global warming - IN ONE OF HIS FIRST
public policy statements as America’s president-elect, Barack Obama
focused on climate change, and clearly stated both his priorities and the
facts on which these priorities rest. Unfortunately, both are weak, or
even wrong.
Obama’s policy outline was presented via video to California Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger’s Governors’ Global Warming Summit, and has again been
shown in Poznan, Poland, to leaders assembled to flesh out a global
warming roadmap. According to Obama, “Few challenges facing America and
the world are more urgent than combating climate change.”
Such a statement is now commonplace for most political leaders around the
world, even though it neglects to address the question of how much we can
do to help America and the world through climate policies versus other
policies. (Providence Journal)
Global
Warming Rope-a-Dope - The global warming scare has provided a field
day for politicians and others who wish to control our lives. After all,
only the imagination limits the kind of laws and restrictions that can be
written in the name of saving the planet. Recently, more and more
scientists are summoning up the courage to speak out and present evidence
against the global warming rope-a-dope. Atmospheric scientist Stanley B.
Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration said, "It is a blatant lie put forth in
the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who
don't buy into anthropogenic global warming." (Walter E. Williams,
Townhall.com)
Where is their thinking? Greenhouse
gases could have caused an ice age, claim scientists - Filling the
atmosphere with Greenhouse gases associated with global warming could push
the planet into a new ice age, scientists have warned.
Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years
ago the earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide but was
completely covered with ice.
The scientists studied limestone rocks and found evidence that large
amounts of greenhouse gas coincided with a prolonged period of freezing
temperatures.
Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the
university's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.
(Daily Telegraph)
Now, wouldn't you think they'd get as far as wondering about the
enhanced greenhouse hypothesis when they saw significantly higher
greenhouse levels in a glaciated world? Shouldn't it have occurred to
them that maybe greenhouse gas levels, specifically atmospheric carbon
dioxide levels, do not control global mean temperature? When are these
guys going to admit that beyond ~100ppmv the effect of increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide is too trivial to exert significant influence
on the climate?
2008:
Another Grim Year for the Global Warmers - The year 2008 marked the
tenth consecutive year of no global warming. This is not widely reported
or known. In fact the Earth has been cooling for the last 6 years.
(Michael R. Fox, Hawaii Reporter)
A
Glimpse Inside the Global Warming Controversy - "Do you believe
in Global Warming?" I have often been asked this question by people
with little or no scientific background. It seems like a simple question
that demands a "yes" or "no" answer. But in reality it
is a complex question that cannot be reduced to an unqualified
"yea" or "nay". The intent of this paper is not to
resolve this question by rallying evidence for or against Global Warming
(as if that can be done in a few pages!), but rather to lay bare the
complexity of the climate change issue. Those who come to appreciate this
fact will likely agree that simple answers are not only bad education, but
can lead to bad policies.
The controversy surrounding global warming is not centered so much on the
increase in global temperature over the last 150 years, but on the primary
cause of this increase-natural, human, or a combination of the two. The
theory in question is called Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).
There is actually more than one AGW theory, and they vary considerably as
to the causes and extent of human induced climate change. The most
prevalent model is based on projections from the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It is this version of
the AGW hypothesis that has become the focus of so much controversy.
(William DiPuccio, ScienceAndPublicPolicy.org)
Another
Romm Rant :)
Actually we hadn't been paying attention but, thanks to Joe's
dummy-spit, we are now aware What's
Up With That and Climate Audit
are again up for weblog
awards - voting opens today and JunkScience.com wishes them well.
ANDREW
ALEXANDER: Politicians, power and a new religion - Since this is the
moment in the year when forecasts are demanded, I shall pick a sad
certainty. Parliament will create more offences, lots of them.
The Government, astonishingly, has apparently created a new imprisonable
offence every four days for the past decade. Curiously little row has been
made about this, least of all by what passes for the parliamentary
Opposition.
Many of the new offences in the coming year are sure to stem from the new
religion: global warming. (Daily Mail)
“Lessons
from History on Climate Change” - A statement by Viv Forbes,
Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition.
The Carbon Sense Coalition today congratulated Senator Barnaby Joyce,
Senator Ron Boswell, Senator Cory Bernardi and Dr Dennis Jensen MP for
their principled stand against the Emissions Trading Scheme.
Releasing a new paper entitled “Climate
Change in Perspective” the Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition,
Mr Viv Forbes, said that changing climate was a permanent feature of
Earth’s history – man did not cause it and cannot change it.
“All over the world, politicians, scientists, taxpayers and shareholders
are waking up to the fact that they have been conned by the global warming
story. All we need to do is read a bit of climate history to get things
into perspective and realize how lucky we are today.”
He commented:
“Within just the last 20,000 years, vast ice sheets melted from the
earth’s surface, seas rose about 130 m, temperatures rose well above
present levels several times, and as the seas warmed, they expelled their
dissolved carbon dioxide.”
“Then just 300 years ago, earth suffered from the bitter cold and
famines caused by the Little Ice Age. Since about 1700 AD, warmth created
by increasing solar activity has been driving back the deadly frosts, snow
and ice. Carbon dioxide is naturally expelled from the warming oceans to
the atmosphere – humans have very little to do with it all.”
“All of these events were caused by and controlled by natural processes,
and all life on earth was forced to adapt or die.”
“Despite continual increases in man’s emissions of carbon dioxide, the
earth has not warmed since 1998. With unseasonal snow, bitter frosts,
power failures and lost crops being reported every week, to send 10,000
pampered politicians and bureaucrats on a junket to Poland to discuss
“Global warming” is surely a sick joke?
“A growing number of politicians are now bravely stating what a large
and increasing number of scientists have been saying: “There is no
global warming crisis, carbon dioxide is a benefit not a danger in the
atmosphere, and the whole Emissions Trading industry is shaping up to be a
bigger financial disaster than the sub-prime mess.” (Carbon Sense
Coalition) | Read the full
document here [PDF, 670KB].
On Puffington? Half-time, change sides? Mr.
Gore: Apology Accepted - You are probably wondering whether
President-elect Obama owes the world an apology for his actions regarding
global warming. The answer is, not yet. There is one person, however, who
does. You have probably guessed his name: Al Gore.
Mr. Gore has stated, regarding climate change, that "the science is
in." Well, he is absolutely right about that, except for one tiny
thing. It is the biggest whopper ever sold to the public in the history of
humankind. (Harold Ambler, Puffington)
Oh dear... Green
Algae Bloom Process Could Stop Global Warming - A team of UK
scientists have discovered a natural process that could delay, or even
end, the threat of global warming.
The researchers, aboard the Royal Navy’s HMS Endurance, have found that
melting icebergs off the coast of Antarctica are releasing millions of
tiny particles of iron into the southern Ocean, helping to create huge
‘blooms’ of algae that absorb carbon emissions. The algae then sinks
to the icy depths, effectively removing CO2 from the atmosphere for
hundreds of years.
According to lead researcher, Prof. Rob Raiswell of Leeds University,
“The Earth itself seems to want to save us.” (Andrew Williams,
CleanTechnica)
... atmospheric carbon dioxide is a resource -- we do not
profit form nor want such a valuable resource lost to the biosphere by any
sequestration method.
Hmm... Soot
reduction 'could help to stop global warming' - Cutting one of
humanity's most common pollutants would have immediate cooling effect,
Nasa claims
Governments could slow global warming dramatically, and buy time to avert
disastrous climate change, by slashing emissions of one of humanity's most
familiar pollutants – soot – according to Nasa scientists. A study by
the space agency shows that cutting down on the pollutant, which has so
far been largely ignored by climate scientists, can have an immediate
cooling effect – and prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths from air
pollution at the same time.
At the beginning of the make-or-break year in international attempts to
negotiate a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, the soot removal
proposal – which is being taken seriously by experts close to the Obama
administration – offers hope of a rapid new way of tackling global
warming. Governments have long experience in acting against soot.
Cutting its emissions has a virtually instantaneous effect, because it
rapidly falls out of the atmosphere, unlike carbon dioxide which remains
there for over a hundred years. And because soot is one of the worst
killers among all pollutants, radical reductions save lives and so should
command popular and political support. (The Independent)
... a lot of dubious statements in so few paragraphs. Gorebull
warming? Meh... Worst killer amongst pollutants? The other one has bells
on it. Apparently they haven't heard of the numbers dying from
contaminated water (contamination with fecal coliforms alone probably
accounts for more enteric morbidity and mortality than all forms of
carbon combined). Carbon dioxide has long atmospheric residence times?
The sawtooth pattern of seasonal abundance says otherwise.
Oh... UM
professor having ‘quite a year’ - MISSOULA — Since winning the
Nobel Peace Prize just over a year ago, University of Montana forestry
professor Steve Running noticed a heightened excitement for his public
lectures.
“Every time I give a talk, I get a standing ovation,” said Running
from his home in the Rattlesnake recently. “Sometimes I get a standing
ovation before I even say a word. That’s pretty cool.”
A year ago in October, former Vice President Al Gore shared the 2007 Nobel
Peace Prize with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — a group
of hundreds of scientists, including Running for bringing an ever-growing
awareness to global climate change.
For Running, the past year has been full of perks, standing ovations and a
personalized front-row bike rack on campus but has also seen challenges. (Missoulian)
... actually the media (and several of the IPCC's hangers-on) have no
idea who really was the recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize -- in
fact the joint recipients were Al Gore and the IPCC (the organization,
not individual contributors jointly and severally). Individual
contributors and reviewers of IPCC documents are categorically not Nobel
Laureates and Running did not win the Nobel Peace Prize.
More
hot air from Met Office - Temperate predictions have been comically
inept, writes Christopher Booker.
Last week, as Britain shivered in sub-zero temperatures, the Met Office
predicted that 2009 would be one of ''the five warmest years on record''.
This statement entertained various US climate experts, such as Dr Roger
Pielke Sr of Colorado University, who recalled how last September the Met
Office forecast that this winter in the UK would be ''milder than
average'', just before we enjoyed the coldest autumn and winter for
decades.
Dr Pielke also recalled the Met Office's prediction two years ago that
2007 would be globally ''the warmest year on record'', beating the
''peak'' year of 1998 (see the Watts Up With That website). Even as they
made that prediction, temperatures began their steepest plunge since they
toppled off that 1998 highpoint, dropping by nearly 0.7C – equivalent to
the entire net warming of the 20th century. (Daily Telegraph)
Pessimistic
Reporting, Optimistic Data - Washington Post correspondent Juliet
Eilperin, in her 12-26-08 report entitled “New climate change estimates
more pessimistic,” dutifully surveys the latest bleak findings of the
climate change community. Her primary source is a recently released survey
commissioned by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program - expanding on the
findings of the 2007 4th IPPC Report on Climate Change. Apparently this
“new assessment suggests that earlier projections may have
underestimated the climatic shifts that could take place by 2100.” One
of Eilperin’s primary examples of alarming new data is reported as
follows:
“In one of the reports most worrisome findings, the agency estimates
that in light of recent ice sheet melting, global sea level rise could be
as much as 4 feet by 2100. The IPCC had projected a sea level rise of no
more than 1.5 feet by that time, but satellite data over the past two
years show the world’s major ice sheets are melting much more rapidly
than previously thought. The Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are now
losing an average of 48 cubic miles of ice a year, equivalent to twice the
amount of ice that exists in the Alps.”
This indeed sounds ominous, until one recalls the data from just over two
years ago, released and reported with similar overtones of dreadful
urgency. Our October 20th, 2006 report entitled “Greenland’s Ice
Melting Slowly” referenced then recent findings from NASA indicating
that Greenland’s ice was melting at “a net loss of 27 cubic miles of
ice per year.” (Ed Ring, EcoWorld)
EU
denounces socialite’s carbon offset project - A PIONEERING climate
change project in Africa run by Robin Birley, the socialite, has been
accused by the European commission, its main donor, of making
unsubstantiated claims about its environmental impact.
The project has received more than £1m in public grants and money from
celebrities in the music and film business. They include Ronnie Wood of
the Rolling Stones and Brad Pitt, the actor.
The project attempts to offset an individual’s carbon footprint by
paying poor farmers in Mozambique to plant trees, which absorb CO2, and to
protect existing forests.
The commission’s criticism comes amid increased concern about the worth
of these fashionable but largely unregulated carbon offset schemes.
Critics say it is almost impossible to guarantee that the trees will
survive the length of time needed to offset any significant carbon
emissions. (Sunday Times)
EU's
new figurehead believes climate change is a myth - The European
Union's new figurehead believes that climate change is a dangerous myth
and has compared the union to a Communist state.
The views of President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic, 67, have left
the government of Mirek Topolanek, his bitter opponent, determined to keep
him as far away as possible from the EU presidency, which it took over
from France yesterday.
The Czech president, who caused a diplomatic incident by dining with
opponents of the EU’s Lisbon treaty on a recent visit to Ireland, has a
largely ceremonial role.
But there are already fears that, after the dynamic EU presidency of
Nicolas Sarkozy - including his hyper-active attempts at international
diplomacy over the credit crisis and Georgia as well as an historic
agreement to cut greenhouse gases - the Czech effort will be mired in
infighting and overshadowed by the platform it will give to Mr Klaus and
his controversial views. (The Times)
Oh, they're out in force with the new year... Climate
scientists: it's time for 'Plan B' - Poll of international experts by
The Independent reveals consensus that CO2 cuts have failed – and their
growing support for technological intervention
An emergency "Plan B" using the latest technology is needed to
save the world from dangerous climate change, according to a poll of
leading scientists carried out by The Independent. The collective
international failure to curb the growing emissions of carbon dioxide
(CO2) in the atmosphere has meant that an alternative to merely curbing
emissions may become necessary.
The plan would involve highly controversial proposals to lower global
temperatures artificially through daringly ambitious schemes that either
reduce sunlight levels by man-made means or take CO2 out of the air. This
"geoengineering" approach – including schemes such as
fertilising the oceans with iron to stimulate algal blooms – would have
been dismissed as a distraction a few years ago but is now being seen by
the majority of scientists we surveyed as a viable emergency backup plan
that could save the planet from the worst effects of climate change, at
least until deep cuts are made in CO2 emissions. (The Independent)
What
can we do to save our planet? - The Independent asked the world's
leading climate scientists whether we should prepare a 'Plan B' to curb
the worst effects of global warming. Their responses are fascinating –
and sobering (The Independent)
Oh dear... Put
climate change in the curriculum - ENVIRONMENTAL consciousness is
sweeping the nation. Politicians, vacation destinations, and college
campuses all try to attract people with talk of carbon footprints, carbon
offsets, and carbon neutrality. And the movement has been fueled by the
SIGG-carrying, bike-riding portion of the population - in other words, by
young adults.
But while environmental responsibility has become a top concern for
colleges, the time has come to make climate change a more prominent
subject of earlier schooling as well.
The point of climate-change education isn't that students should be able
to spout carbon-emissions facts as they hug trees and recycle everything
within reach (though they may do much of that after learning the facts).
As climate change becomes more and more dire, it affects every aspect of
our lives: social, political, physical, and economic. Recognizing this,
the G-8 summit culminated in a commitment by the major industrial nations
to a 50 percent decrease in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
But how can we ever achieve that change if today's secondary- and
elementary-school students lack the tools to understand the problem and
build solutions? (Queen Arsem-O'Malley, Boston Globe)
Diamonds
Linked to Quick Cooling Eons Ago - At least once in Earth’s history,
global warming ended quickly, and scientists have long wondered why.
Now researchers are reporting that the abrupt cooling — which took place
about 12,900 years ago, just as the planet was emerging from an ice age
— may have been caused by one or more meteors that slammed into North
America.
That could explain the extinction of mammoths, saber-tooth tigers and
maybe even the first human inhabitants of the Americas, the scientists
report in Friday’s issue of the journal Science. (New York Times)
Gems
Point to Comet as Answer to Ancient Riddle - Something dramatic
happened about 12,900 years ago, and the continent of North America was
never the same. A thriving culture of Paleo-Americans, known as the Clovis
people, vanished seemingly overnight. Gone, too, were most of the largest
animals: horses, camels, lions, mammoths, mastodons, saber-toothed cats,
ground sloths and giant armadillos.
Scientists have long blamed climate change for the extinctions, for it was
12,900 years ago that the planet's emergence from the Ice Age came to a
halt, reverting to glacial conditions for 1,500 years, an epoch known as
the Younger Dryas.
In just the last few years, there has arisen a controversial scientific
hypothesis to explain this chain of events, and it involves an
extraterrestrial calamity: a comet, broken into fragments, turning the sky
ablaze, sending a shock wave across the landscape and scorching forests,
creatures, people and anything exposed to the heavenly fire.
Now the proponents of this apocalyptic scenario say they have found a new
line of evidence: nanodiamonds. They say they have found these tiny
structures across North America in sediments from 12,900 years ago, and
they argue that the diamonds had to have been formed by a
high-temperature, high-pressure event, such as a cometary impact.
(Washington Post)
No
Matter What Happens, Someone Will Blame Global Warming - Global
warming was blamed for everything from beasts gone wild to anorexic whales
to the complete breakdown of human society this year -- showing that no
matter what it is and where it happens, scientists, explorers, politicians
and those who track the Loch Ness Monster are comfortable scapegoating the
weather.
FOXNews.com takes a look back at 10 things that global warming allegedly
caused — or will no doubt soon be responsible for — as reported in the
news around the world in 2008. (FNC)
Global
Warming Unlikely Reason for Slow Coral Growth - “Researchers in
Australia say the growth of coral on the country’s iconic Great Barrier
Reef (GBR) has fallen since 1990 to its lowest rate in 400 years,”
variations of this message have been repeated around the world from South
Korea to London with global warming, and the associated acidification of
oceans, claimed to be the cause.
These reports are repeating claims in an Australian Institute of Marine
Science (AIMS) media release made just last Friday to coincide with the
publication of research findings in the journal Science [1].
The media release also claimed the research to be “the most
comprehensive study to date on calcification rates of GBR corals”.
Having followed GBR issues for many years I was surprised to hear global
warming associated with slow coral growth rates, indeed AIMS’s
researchers Janice Lough and David Barnes have published detailed studies
concluding that coral growth rates increase significantly with an increase
in annual average sea surface temperature [2]. Furthermore growth rates
actually decrease from north to south along the GBR as this corresponds
with a cooling temperature gradient of 2-3 degrees C.
If there has been a slowing in growth rates of coral over the last nearly
20 years, as suggested by this new research, a most obvious question for
me would be: Have GBR waters cooled? (JenniferMarohasy.com)
Globaloney
Update: A Tale of Two 'Realities' - From June: 'No ice at the North
Pole,' to January: 'Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979'
No pairing of any two stories better illustrates the child-like alarmism
of global warming religionists than these two stories. The first from June
of 2008 claims that all the ice at the North Pole has melted and will be
gone for the first time ever, while the second shows that by January of
2009 the polar ice measurements show that it is the same as it was in
1979, with no ice loss seen at all between then and now. (Warner Todd
Huston, NewsBusters)
VIN SUPRYNOWICZ:
'Greenland and the polar ice cap are melting' - Of course it would be
more convenient for the Luddites if I were to accept their underlying
assumptions and limit myself to "critiquing policy as regards energy
and conservation." Just as, in 1500, it would have been judged much
safer to study how best to discover and destroy witches rather than to
challenge whether the old crones had any demonic powers in the first
place. (Review Journal)
NSIDC
issues documentation corrections - WUWT guest post a catalyst - You
may recall the guest post from Jeff Id of the Air Vent I carried about a
week ago called Global Sea Ice Trend Since 1979 - surprising
In that post, a note of correction was issued because that we were led to
believe (by Tamino) that the entire post was “invalidated” due to an
error in accounting for ice area very near the pole. Both Jeff and I were
roundly criticized for “not reading the documentation”, which was one
of the more civil criticisms over there at Tamino’s site.
After further investigation It turns out that the error was in NSIDC’s
public documentation, and they have issued a correction to it. Even more
importantly the correction now affects NSIDC’s own trend graph, and they
are considering how to handle it. (Watts Up With That?)
Funny: Canada's
forests, once huge help on greenhouse gases, now contribute to climate
change - VANCOUVER — As relentlessly bad as the news about global
warming seems to be, with ice at the poles melting faster than scientists
had predicted and world temperatures rising higher than expected, there
was at least a reservoir of hope stored here in Canada's vast forests.
The country's 1.2 million square miles of trees have been dubbed the
"lungs of the planet" by ecologists because they account for
more than 7 percent of Earth's total forest lands. They could always be
depended upon to suck in vast quantities of carbon dioxide, naturally
cleansing the world of much of the harmful heat-trapping gas.
But not anymore.
In an alarming yet little-noticed series of recent studies, scientists
have concluded that Canada's precious forests, stressed from damage caused
by global warming, insect infestations and persistent fires, have crossed
an ominous line and are now pumping out more climate-changing carbon
dioxide than they are sequestering. (Chicago Tribune)
Wonder if they've noticed how well the alleged change of temperate
forests from "global asset" to "global hazard"
correlates with greenie interference with commercial logging? "To
the chainsaws!" "Save us from the trees!" Nah, can't see
it catching on.
How we know they know
they are lying - It is to some extent forgivable when people adopt
extreme positions out of misapprehension or delusion. It is quite another
matter if they mislead others by deliberate falsehood. Politicians, of
course, treat the lie as part of their professional equipment. Indeed, in
some circumstances they are obliged to use it (when, for example, telling
the truth about the economy would cause a run on the currency). In
science, up to recent times, there is no circumstance in which a
deliberate falsehood is justifiable. It requires at a minimum being
drummed out of one’s learned society.
All that has changed with the rise of authoritarian government. In Britain
this took the form of nationalisation of the universities, begun under
Thatcher and completed under Blair. In the USA it took the form of new
state-funded bureaucracies, such as the EPA, who maintained control by the
monopoly of funding. The global warming religion changed everything.
There is a contrast in the behaviour of people who speak from conviction
and those who speak from convenience. This enables us to uncover those who
are lying deliberately and distinguish them from the merely deluded. As M.
Maigret once remarked “It is always the clever ones who leave a clue.”
(John Brignell, Number Watch)
New
JGR Paper “Inter-annual Variations In Earth’s Reflectance” By Pallé
Et Al 2009 - There is an important new paper to appear in JGR [and
thanks to Mike Jonas for altering us to it!]. It is Pallé, E., P. R.
Goode, and P. Montanes-Rodriguez (2009), Inter-annual trends in Earth’s
reflectance 1999-2007, J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2008JD010734, in
press. (accepted 21 November 2008)
The abstract reads: “The overall reflectance of sunlight from Earth is a
fundamental parameter for climate studies. Recently, measurements of
earthshine were used to find large decadal variability in Earth’s
reflectance of sunlight. However, the results did not seem consistent with
contemporaneous independent albedo measurements from the low Earth orbit
satellite, CERES, which showed a weak, opposing trend. Now, more data for
both are available, all sets have been either re-analyzed (earthshine) or
re-calibrated (CERES), and present consistent results. Albedo data are
also available from the recently released ISCCP FD product. Earthshine and
FD analyses show contemporaneous and climatologically significant
increases in the Earth’s reflectance from the outset of our earthshine
measurements beginning in late 1998 roughly until mid- 2000. After that
and to date, all three show a roughly constant terrestrial albedo, except
for the FD data in the most recent years. Using satellite cloud data and
Earth reflectance models, we also show that the decadal scale changes in
Earth’s reflectance measured by earthshine are reliable, and caused by
changes in the properties of clouds rather than any spurious signal, such
as changes in the Sun-Earth-Moon geometry.” (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Wgtn
hosts climate experts - The world's leading climate history experts
will converge on Wellington over the next two weeks for a conference on
the history of climate change.
The conference, organised by GNS Science, will examine the greenhouse
climate of the Paleogene period, 65 to 35 million years ago. It is
believed that was the last time the Earth experienced global warming on a
scale similar to what is being projected for the future.
Conference organiser Chris Hollis says there is growing evidence that
temperatures in high latitude places like New Zealand have been far higher
than previously thought.
He says they hope to come to a conclusion about how real the current
climate warming is. (Newstalk ZB)
Global
Warming Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg - The Cold War shaped world
politics for half a century. But global warming may shape the patterns of
global conflict for much longer than that -- and help spark clashes that
will be, in every sense of the word, hot wars.
We're used to thinking of climate change as an environmental problem, not
a military one, but it's long past time to alter that mindset. Climate
change may mean changes in Western lifestyles, but in some parts of the
world, it will mean far more. Living in Washington, I may respond to
global warming by buying a Prius, planting a tree or lowering my
thermostat. But elsewhere, people will respond to climate change by
building bomb shelters and buying guns. (James R. Lee, Washington Post)
Well, much as I agree gun s are good James, they are completely
useless when it comes to fighting a phantom menace like gorebull
warming.
UN:
Recognize Victims of Climate Change, Environmental Refuges - Right
Side News Reports finds a disturbing article called Look out! Millions of
"environmentally persecuted" third worlders may be headed our
way! on Refugee Resettlement Watch which is run by Ann Corcoran. Please
read. (Right Side News)
2008
was the year man-made global warming was disproved - Looking back over
my columns of the past 12 months, one of their major themes was neatly
encapsulated by two recent items from The Daily Telegraph.
The first, on May 21, headed "Climate change threat to Alpine ski
resorts" , reported that the entire Alpine "winter sports
industry" could soon "grind to a halt for lack of snow".
The second, on December 19, headed "The Alps have best snow
conditions in a generation" , reported that this winter's Alpine
snowfalls "look set to beat all records by New Year's Day".
Easily one of the most important stories of 2008 has been all the evidence
suggesting that this may be looked back on as the year when there was a
turning point in the great worldwide panic over man-made global warming.
Just when politicians in Europe and America have been adopting the most
costly and damaging measures politicians have ever proposed, to combat
this supposed menace, the tide has turned in three significant respects.
(Christopher Booker, Daily Telegraph)
Al
Gore’s global warming debunked – by kids! - Al Gore’s global
warming philosophy has been debunked by many scientists and studies, and
now it has met the same fate at the hands of children, in “The Sky’s
Not Falling” video/essay contest, sponsored by World Net Daily Books,
formerly World Ahead Media.
The contest was launched early in 2008 and was designed to highlight the
absurdities, untruths and downright lies that children are being taught
daily about “climate change” in public school.
Russell Young, a Minnesota writer who captured first place in the essay
competition, explained the importance of using celebrities such as Gore
and the medium of movies to enhance the educational experience for
students. (Conservative Meanderings)
Global
warming dissenters dash scientific 'consensus' - The Republican
minority of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee released a
report with a growing list of over 650 international experts who soundly
debunk the claim that there exists a "consensus" in science that
human activity is causing a global warming.
The introduction to the 231-page Senate minority report states, "The
chorus of skeptical scientific voices grew louder in 2008 as a steady
stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data and
inconvenient developments challenged the U.N.'s and former Vice President
Al Gore's claims that the 'science is settled.'" (WorldNetDaily)
Even
gurus of warming admit the hot spot went missing - Big names like
Santer, Sherwood, and Schmidt admit that the models predict more warming
10 km above the equator than what the weather balloons could find. Each
time they announce that they’ve resolved the differences, they have to
start by admitting there are differences to resolve.
My point here is that some bloggers are variously arguing the nonsensical
or irrelevant: that, a/ the hot-spot was always there; b/ it doesn’t
matter if it’s not found, and c/ it would occur with all climate
forcings. Which disagrees with the top expert supporters of AGW.
The real debate is now about whether the hot-spot has been found or not.
The top alarmists argue that we’ve sort of ‘found’ the hot-spot
recently with new statistical rehashes or by using wind-gauges instead of
thermometers. Note that even when they imply they’ve ‘found it’,
after an unfortunate reader wades through the convoluted language, it
turns out that they’ve just increased the error bars so they stretch far
enough to include the real world results. Thus, it’s no longer
’statistically different’.
So to state the obvious, from the mouths of the AGW experts themselves…
1/ the discrepancy matters, and 2/ even they agree it was definitely
missing. (Jo Nova)
Conflicting
Scientific Data Fuels Global Warming Debate - Contrary to the
preponderance of media coverage, manmade global warming is anything but a
scientific certainty. Making policy on scientific uncertainty is a foolish
and unsupportable exercise fraught with danger for our way of life. (James
Shott, American Sentinel)
Reply
to Deltoid - Dear Tim Lambert has tried to reply to my not found the
hotspot post and The Skeptics Handbook. (Jo Nova)
Attempting
to Intimidate a Skeptic? - Leo Elshof from Arcadia University in
Canada has written to me asking that I put a comedy disclaimer on the
Skeptics Handbook, and otherwise threatens to ridicule me at international
conferences and set the media onto me. The email is here and my reply is
below. What have our universities sunk too? (Jo Nova)
AGW is
a religion - Science based ideas are falsifiable, whereas religious
ones are not (thanks Karl Popper). That means even our most favourite
scientific theories can be dumped in a bin if new evidence shows they are
wrong or ‘falsifies them’. (See here for what qualifies as evidence).
Religious people get strength through knowing that no matter what happens,
their faith will not be shaken. There is nothing that can prove to them
that God (or climate change) does not exist. Religious faith has many
benefits, but it doesn’t belong in a scientific debate, and it’s a
lousy way to decide most public policy. (Jo Nova)
Guest
Commentary: Global warming - In a pair of recent columns claiming
humans are causing a global-warming crisis, Ben Bova disparages mere
“assertions” while saying people need to rely on “observable,
measurable facts.” While Bova’s concern about Earth’s climate is
admirable, he should follow his own advice regarding assertions versus
facts.
Bova asserts Earth has a “rising fever.” Yet the fact is that global
temperatures are unusually cool. For most of the past 10,000 years
temperatures have been 1.0 to 3.0 degrees Celsius warmer than they are
today. The 0.6 degree rise in temperatures during the 20th century
occurred from the baseline of the little ice age, which saw the coldest
global temperatures during the past 10,000 years. Earth has a “rising
fever” only if we pretend the little ice age was “normal” and ignore
Earth’s long-term temperature facts. (James M. Taylor, Naples Daily
News)
Global
warming screed suffers from scarcity of facts - With the holiday
season on the wane, 'tis once again the season for fictitious
global-warming scares. New Jersey Sierra Club director Jeff Tittel's
latest foray into the fictitious world of global warming make-believe
("State's plan to curb global warming tepid," Dec. 26 op-ed)
would make even Pinocchio blush.
Tittel claimed, without providing any supporting data or evidence, that
global warming is causing increased drought conditions in New Jersey. A
quick look at National Climatic Data Center precipitation records for New
Jersey explains why Tittel did not back his claim with any supporting data
or evidence: There is no such increase in drought conditions. (James M.
Taylor, APP)
Sheesh! Global
warming as a valuable parenting tool - Global warming. Melting
snowcaps. Rising tides. Gloom and doom. There's never been a better time
to be an American dad.
Now, when your kids turn up the thermostat just because they can see their
breath, you can calmly say, "We're keeping the thermostat down to do
our part to help the planet." Instead of what American fathers have
screamed since the invention of the thermostat: "When you pay the
bills, you can turn the heat all the way up to 200, you little
ingrate."
What a difference a global climate crisis makes. I'm telling you, fellow
fathers of America, we're living in a perfect era. Finally, our frugality
has a higher calling. Thank you, WeCanSolveIt.org. Thank you, Barack Obama
and John McCain, for saying "alternative energy" and
"carbon offsets" 400,000 times in two months. Thank you,
kindergarten teachers of America, for teaching the three R's. My only
regret is that my children aren't younger. The last one is quickly
approaching 18. (Jim Sollisch, Chicago Tribune)
Burning
Coal at Home Is Making a Comeback - SUGARLOAF, Pa. — Kyle Buck
heaved open the door of a makeshift bin abutting his suburban ranch house.
Staring at a two-ton pile of coal that was delivered by truck a few weeks
ago, Mr. Buck worried aloud that it would not be enough to last the
winter.
“I think I’m going through it faster than I thought I would,” he
said.
Aptly, perhaps, for an era of hard times, coal is making a comeback as a
home heating fuel.
Problematic in some ways and difficult to handle, coal is nonetheless a
cheap, plentiful, mined-in-America source of heat. And with the cost of
heating oil and natural gas increasingly prone to spikes, some homeowners
in the Northeast, pockets of the Midwest and even Alaska are deciding coal
is worth the trouble.
Burning coal at home was once commonplace, of course, but the practice had
been declining for decades. Coal consumption for residential use hit a low
of 258,000 tons in 2006 — then started to rise. It jumped 9 percent in
2007, according to the Energy Information Administration, and 10 percent
more in the first eight months of 2008. (New York Times)
Getting out of the power business? Dynegy
ends coal-plant venture with LS Power - NEW YORK, Jan 2 - Power
company Dynegy Inc will end its power plant development joint venture with
LS Power Associates because of tough credit markets and regulatory hurdles
in building new coal-fired plants, the company said on Friday.
Under the agreement to end the two-year-old venture, Dynegy will pay LS
Power $19 million in cash in the first quarter and will record a loss in
2009 related to the transaction, the company said in a statement.
LS Power will acquire ownership and development rights for potential new
coal-fired projects in Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan and Nevada, along
with other projects not related to Dynegy's operating assets. (Reuters)
Nuke
revival puts all risk on customers - While Georgia Power and other
utilities eagerly advocate a “nuclear renaissance,” their enthusiasm
for building new plants doesn’t extend to sharing the considerable
financial risks involved. Nor have private investors flocked to put money
in new nuclear plants.
To the contrary, Georgia Power’s proposal to build two reactors at its
existing Vogtle plant on the Savannah River near Augusta calls for company
ratepayers —- you and me and anybody else who pays an electric bill to
Georgia Power —- to bear almost all the considerable risk while making
sure its stockholders and private investors bear almost no risk at all.
(Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
Russia
Cuts Off Gas Deliveries to Ukraine - MOSCOW — In the face of
mounting economic troubles, Russia cut off deliveries of natural gas to
Ukraine on Thursday after Ukraine rejected the Kremlin’s demands for a
sharp increase in gas prices.
A similar reduction in supplies to Ukraine in 2006 caused a drop in
pressure throughout Europe’s integrated natural gas pipeline system and
led to shortages in countries as far away as Italy and France.
But with a recessionary drop in demand, ample supplies and assurances from
both countries that gas would flow westward without interruption, there
were few signs of the near hysteria in Europe that accompanied the 2006
cutoff. (New York Times)
Energy Rationing Will
Not Make Wisconsin Rich - Perhaps they took credit for the decline in
energy use as a result of the economic downturn. Of course, that would be
misleading. Then again, fake facts are the only way to defend the claim
that we can all get rich by fighting climate change. (William Yeatman,
Cooler Heads Digest)
A
Global Warming Howler for the New Year - Move over city and highway
MPG. Smog ratings - you're yesterday's news. Beginning today, those
shopping a new ride in California will face a new standard in town --
something called a "Global Warming Score."
No kidding. (Marc Sheppard, American Thinker)
Promoters
overstated the environmental benefit of wind farms - The wind farm
industry has been forced to admit that the environmental benefit of wind
power in reducing carbon emissions is only half as big as it had
previously claimed. (Daily Telegraph)
Stanford
University Study Shows Ethanol to be Worst Form of Renewable Energy -
Mark Jacobson, professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and
director of the Atmosphere/Energy Program at Stanford University, recently
conducted a study that ranked alternate energies from best to worst.
Ethanol was put to the test against, "Solar-photovoltaic (PV),
concentrated solar power (CSP), wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, wave,
tidal, nuclear, and coal with carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technology." After looking at reports of air pollutants from energy
types on climate and air quality, and comparing how well each energy type
was able to power vehicles, the study showed that Ethanol came in dead
last. (NextAutos.com)
Bariatric
surgery for diabetic teens — in their best interests? - Research
that enables pediatricians to provide the best care for their young
patients is something many wonderful doctors truly care about, and
certainly parents do, too. That’s why it is unimaginable this article
appeared in a medical journal. There is simply no credible justification
for its publication.
This article in the January issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the
American Academy of Pediatrics, wasn’t a clinical trial. In fact, it
violated basic principles of medical research and offered no information
that any credible healthcare professional would actually use in the care
of patients. Its unsupportable conclusions were further sensationalized
beyond recognition in a press release, with claims not remotely supported
by the findings or the methodology. Yet, it was devoured by gullible
journalists and resulted in 331 dramatic news stories in a single day,
with amazing promises that, no doubt, brought countless new customers to
the lead medical center. (Junkfood Science)
A
strange-sounding illness leads to speculations and misinformation -
The tragic loss of Mr. and Mrs. John Travolta’s son, Jett, has led to
endless media speculations. All that is actually known for now is that one
of the two nannies caring for him at the family’s vacation home on Grand
Bahama, found him unconscious in the bathroom Friday morning and he was
pronounced dead at a Freeport hospital. That hasn’t stopped rumors and
theories.
This tragedy has also spread myths and misinformation, and raised concerns
among parents, about Kawasaki disease, one of the conditions being cited
as a possible contributing factor. (Junkfood Science)
The
new word for 2009: bansturbation - Today, the government officially
launched its Change4Life advertising campaign, based on the Foresight
Report. Its aim is to create a “lifestyle revolution” by promoting
diet and exercise, Healthy Towns, and other programs aimed to eradicate
obesity from the UK. Friends there are being buried alive in media
stories, 465 and counting…
Many are finding humor the only response left. It’s not like the
government is using science or facts or anything like that.
The Englishman invented a new word for the year to describe the
over-the-top program. He observed that politicians are getting off on
bansturbation. (Junkfood Science)
Left-Coast lunacy: I’ll
Have to Call My Lawyer - “Good Samaritan” laws give legal
protection to bystanders who courageously come to the aid of people in
emergencies. Last month, the California Supreme Court gave its state law a
disturbingly narrow interpretation that could discourage future good
Samaritans from providing help out of fear of being sued. (New York Times)
What are they smoking? Third-Hand
Smoke Lingers on Hair and Clothing - If you've made a New Years
resolution to quit smoking, here's another reason to keep you motivated.
The health problems associated with smoking and second-hand smoke exposure
are well-known, but now researchers are concerned about something called
third-hand smoke.
Even if you don't smoke around your children, a study finds toxins from
tobacco smoke can linger in the air and on hair and clothing long after a
cigarette is put out, and can transfer to a baby or small child easily.
(MSNBC)
Granted smoke from cheap cigarettes leaves a dreadful odor on clothes
and hair but then, so can certain emissions from babies and toddlers --
the pathogens in which really can be quite hazardous to your health.
Bizarrely, the people who panic over the whiff of tobacco tend to be the
same ones who subject their little ones to the chemical assaults of
"aroma therapy", incense, scented candles, air fresheners and
the cacophony of odors from lotions, washes, perfumes, aftershaves and
deodorants... go figure!
From the rubber room: Building
an Anti-Capitalist Movement for Climate Justice - Climate change is on
everyone’s mind. Whether you work for the Sierra Club or ExxonMobil,
rallying behind the call to “fight climate change” is becoming the
norm. With each dire report that comes out and every unseasonably severe
storm that devastates some corner of the Earth, the reality that humans
are destroying the life-support systems of this planet is becoming clear
to more people.
Yet, even with so many warning signs that modern society is hurtling
toward the abyss of climate catastrophe, mainstream climate activism
remains dominated by watered-down notions of what is “politically
feasible.” The demands of professional environmentalists are not driven
by what we need to ensure that the Earth can survive, but by what sort of
“request” can gain political traction; what tiny step can we get them
to agree to? “No real change can happen without industry,” they say.
“How can we get the corporations on board? How can we convince them that
they can make just as much money off of us with wind and solar as they can
with fossil fuels?” (Rising Tide Bay Area)
More from the Left-Coast: California
Challenges Endangered Species Rule Changes - SAN FRANCISCO - Charging
that the outgoing Bush administration is trying to gut the Endangered
Species Act, California has sued to stop the federal government from going
ahead with mining, logging and other environmentally sensitive projects
without consulting scientists. (Reuters)
Sand
on roads worse than salt, scientists say - Sand — one of Seattle's
main weapons against icy streets — is more likely to harm aquatic life
than the salt the city refuses to use out of concern for its environmental
effects.
That's the opinion of scientists who have studied the issue and officials
from other cities that use salt to clear icy roads. (Seattle Times)
EPA
'Cow Tax' Could Charge $175 per Dairy Cow to Curb Greenhouse Gases -
Farm Bureau warns just this one rule may increase milk production costs up
to 8 cents a gallon. (Jeff Poor, Business & Media Institute)
January 2, 2009
Seeing any RED? Obama
energy/environment 'czar' is an offical with Socialist International -
That's right comrades... Carol Browner is a member
of Socialist International's Commission for a Sustainable World Society.
Check out SI's principles
-- including, "it is imperative to establish a genuinely new
international economic order."
Let There
Be Dark? - Some astronomers seem to be willing to say and do just
about anything just to get a better look at the heavens, including making
city streets safer for criminals.
In a commentary in Nature magazine (Jan. 1) presaging the 2009
International Year of Astronomy, astronomer Malcolm Smith says that it’s
time for cities to “turn off the lights” so we can better see the
Milky Way, conserve energy, protect wildlife and benefit human health.
Smith is part of the so-called Dark Skies Awareness project, an
international coalition of astronomers and related institutions that wants
to “find allies in a common cause to convince authorities and the public
that a dark sky is a valuable resource for everyone.”
“A fifth of the world’s population cannot see the Milky Way,” is
Smith’s headline argument. “This has a subtle cultural impact. Without
a direct view of the stars, mankind is cut off from most of the Universe,
deprived of any direct sense of its huge scale and our tiny place within
it,” he asserts.
That fuzzy mix of cosmology, sociology and psychology would seem to be an
odd argument coming from someone who holds himself out to be a scientist.
Odder still is Smith’s subsequent statement that, “Our relationship
with artificial light is complicated and changing. Humans innately fear
the darkness and modern society relies on light as a security measure,
even though there is no evidence that controlling light wastage increases
crime levels.” (Steven Milloy, FoxNews.com)
Californians in
Control - The Obama transition team continues to talk to House and
Senate Democratic leaders about trying to move a big ($850 billion?)
economic stimulus package soon after the new Congress is sworn in. Every
special interest in the country is trying to stake a claim to a share of
the cash, including promoters of “green jobs” and those that claim
that transforming the energy economy to rely on much more costly forms of
renewable energy would somehow stimulate the economy. As the Washington
Post noted this week, our energy and environmental policy is now in the
hands of powerful legislators from California, where they actually believe
that raising consumer and producer costs and pricing people out of jobs is
sound public policy. (And where the State, perhaps co-incidentally, now
confronts a $40 billion budget deficit.) We shall see what happens next
week. (Myron Ebell, Cooler Heads Digest)
Ambrose:
Watch Obama closely on global warming - In Poland recently,
representatives of the European Union were discussing ways to look like
soldiers in the war against global warming while once more dodging the
draft, and outside there were the usual sorts of doomsday-prognosticating
protesters. Some were dressed as penguins, devils and polar bears, it's
reported.
The uniforms strike me as about right, although I also think clown clothes
and makeup would be appropriate for many of the loudest worriers about
climate change, such as Al Gore and Arnold Schwarzenegger. That's not to
say they will fail to get their way as a new president takes office amidst
whoppers about how Europe is all progress on this issue while dumb,
selfish America is lagging.
The truth that the United States did more to control carbon emissions than
Europe during one recently measured period as President Bush took some
modest, common-sense precautions and European nations took bows for
signing a Kyoto treaty most of the signatories then ignored. The
all-show-no-go European Union's recent conference in Poland produced some
tough, new goals along with a plentitude of escape hatches, rendering
these goals meaningless from the start.
It's a clever strategy, and one that President-elect Barack Obama ought to
emulate, given that virtually any program to make energy more costly at
this time of economic peril would be catastrophic while achieving
something on the order of nothing. A voice of wisdom on the issue is that
of William Nordhaus, a Yale economics professor who says the best means to
avoid throwing trillions of dollars away to little avail is a coordinated,
phased-in program of carbon taxes for the whole world. (Jay Ambrose, News
Tribune)
Great New Climate Blog from Dr.
Roy Spencer - Dr. Roy Spencer has a new climate blog, http://www.DrRoySpencer.com.
In an age of alarmism, Dr. Spencer's new blog is an invaluable resource
for cooler heads.
Global
warming: The new eugenics - Eugenics pioneer, Francis Galton, defined
eugenics as "the study of all agencies under human control which can
improve or impair the racial quality of future generations."
Global warming can be defined as: "The study of all agencies under
human control which can improve or impair the environmental quality of
future generations."
The eugenics movement and the global warming movement are similar in many
respects. Both ideas were introduced by scientists, advanced by
politicians, popularized by the media, embraced as a moral necessity,
resulted in severe consequences and eventually rejected as harmful
hogwash.
Eugenics, thankfully, has run its course. Global warming, however, is
approaching its zenith, just before imposing severe consequences, and is,
perhaps, still a generation away from being rejected as the hogwash it is.
(Henry Lamb, WND)
“Forecasting
the Future of Hurricanes” by Anna Barratt In Nature - There was a
recent Nature news article
Barratt, A., 2008: Forecasting the future of hurricanes. Nature News.
Published online December 11, 2008. doi:10.1038/news.2008.1298.
The article is titled
A meteorologist’s new model zooms in on how climate change affects
Atlantic storms.
by Anna Barnett
“The world’s most advanced simulation of extreme weather on a warming
Earth completed its first run on 5 December. Greg Holland at the US
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado, is
leading the project, which nests detailed regional forecasts into a model
of global climate change up to the mid-21st century. Under the model’s
microscope are future hurricane seasons in the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean, along with rainfall over the Rocky Mountains and wind patterns
in the Great Plains.”
This type of article perpetuates the myth that the climate science
community currently has the capability to make skilled regional
multi-decadal predictions [in this case of hurricane activity]. Such
claims to not conform even to the statements by IPCC authors. (Roger
Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Lesson
of the Lesser Antilles - Are you tired of winter yet? How about a
vacation to some warm tropical island with outstanding golf and scuba
(excellent winter sports)? If we suggest the Lesser Antilles (also know as
the Caribbees), you might immediately agree; a second later, you might
realize the shortcomings of your geography training and wonder where on
Earth you are going for this vacation. (WCR)
Green
Goal of 'Carbon Neutrality' Hits Limit - ROUND ROCK, Texas -- Computer
giant Dell Inc. said this summer that it has become "carbon
neutral," the latest step in its quest to be "the greenest
technology company on the planet."
What that means, and what it doesn't, may surprise Dell customers and
other consumers who have been bombarded with bold environmental promises
from major corporations.
In the two years since Al Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth,"
helped make climate change a marquee issue, companies from Timberland Co.,
the shoe maker, to News Corp., the owner of The Wall Street Journal, have
promised to become "carbon neutral."
The term may suggest a company has reengineered itself so that it's no
longer adding to the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases scientists
say are contributing to climate change. The experience of Dell, one of the
few multinational corporations to claim it already has achieved carbon
neutrality, shows the reality often falls short of that ideal.
The amount of emissions Dell has committed to neutralize is known in the
environmental industry as the company's "carbon footprint." But
there is no universally accepted standard for what a footprint should
include, and so every company calculates its differently. Dell counts the
emissions produced by its boilers and company-owned cars, its buildings'
electricity use, and its employees' business air travel.
In fact, that's only a small fraction of all the emissions associated with
Dell. The footprint doesn't include the oil used by Dell's suppliers to
make its computer parts, the diesel and jet fuel used to ship those
computers around the world, or the coal-fired electricity used to run
them. (Jeffrey Ball, Wall Street Journal)
Issue
Advocacy By The UK Met Office And The University Of East Anglia -
Staff at the UK Met Office and the University of East Anglia in the United
Kingdom continue to communicate erroneous information on the changes of
heat content within the climate system. (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate
Science)
Erroneous
News Article In The Times - Thanks to Andrew Forster of Local
Transport Today in the UK for alerting us to the erroneous news article
from the Times on December 27 2008 titled
The war on carbon - Arguments of 2009: Can Copenhagen save the planet?
An excerpt reads,
“The stakes at Copenhagen could not be much higher. Global surface
temperatures have risen by a tolerable three quarters of a degree celsius
over the past century, but the rate of increase is accelerating. The Kyoto
Protocol has had negligible impact on greenhouse gas emissions, and
projections for the mean global temperature rise in the next century range
from 1.1 to 6.4 degrees. Whether fast or very fast, the Earth is heating
up.
There will be continued argument about the science of climate change over
the next 12 months, but not, except on the conspiratorial fringe, about
the threat. Climate change is real and worsening, and there is an
overwhelming likelihood that much of it is man-made.”
This is a erroneous report on the climate system! The rate of increase is
NOT accelerating. There is absolutely no question that global warming has
stopped for at least 4 years (using upper ocean data) (Roger Pielke Sr.,
Climate Science)
Aerosol-Precipitation
Interactions Meeting - Another Example Of The Breadth Of Human And Natural
Climate Forcings - Thanks to Meinrat O. Andreae for alerting us to yet
another meeting at the EGU meeting in April which further documents the
diversity of first order climate forcings. The meeting is at the EGU
General Assembly in Vienna, 19 – 24 April 2009 is AS1.15
Aerosol-Precipitation Interactions (Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
Yet
Another EGU Meeting That Demonstrates The Diversity Of Climate Forcings:
“Biospheric Feedbacks In The Climate System In The Past, Present, And
Future” - Thanks to Martin Claussen, Victor Brovkin, and Ning Zeng
there is another meeting which shows the complexity of the climate system.
It is
“Biospheric feedbacks in the climate system in the past, present, and
future” (Session CL21) at the EGU General Assembly in Vienna, 19 - 24
April 2009. Convener: Claussen, M. Co-Conveners: Brovkin, V.; Zeng, N.
(Roger Pielke Sr., Climate Science)
NASA's
Hansen to Obama: Use Global Warming to Redistribute Wealth - Climate
realists around the world have contended for years that the real goal of
alarmists such as Nobel Laureate Al Gore and his followers is to use the
fear of man-made global warming to redistribute wealth.
On Monday, one of Gore's leading scientific resources, Goddard Institute
for Space Studies chief James Hansen, sent a letter to Barack and Michelle
Obama specifically urging the president-elect to enact a tax on carbon
emissions that would take money from higher-income Americans and
distribute the proceeds to the less fortunate.
The eco-socialism cat was let out of the bag on page five of a PDF Hansen
published at Columbia University's website on December 29 (emphasis added,
h/t Britain's Guardian, file photo): (NewsBusters)
Cooling
global warming hysteria just one story of '08 - For us who enjoy the
privilege of sharing our views with readers of the Herald, the last column
of the year affords an opportunity to review the big stories of the past
12 months. Another option is to consider a few well-known stories, the
significance of which was either overlooked or is as yet unclear. Here are
two.
First, the scientific debate over climate change has entered a new phase.
This change is reflected in, though hardly constituted by, petitions
signed by natural scientists of various kinds disputing the so-called
consensus that human-caused CO2 is responsible for global warming.
Two aspects of this story can be distinguished. As James Peden, an
atmospheric physicist, said, many scientists "are now searching for a
way to back out quietly" from global-warming fearmongering,
"without having their professional careers ruined."
This is an ethical or political problem, not a problem in climate science.
The crux of it is that major research grants and, in this country,
prestigious Canada Research Chairs, have been awarded on the assumption
something must be done to stop CO2 from destroying the world. (Barry
Cooper, Calgary Herald)
2008
Ends Spotless and with 266 Spotless Days, the #2 Least Active Year Since
1900, Portends Cooling - 2008 will be coming to a close with yet
another spotless days according to the latest solar image.
This will bring the total number of sunspotless days this month to 28 and
for the year to 266, clearly enough to make 2008, the second least active
solar year since 1900. (Joseph D’Aleo CCM, AMS Fellow)
Dissent,
discussion over cause of global warming - The debate over global
warming heated up in 2008, with prominent meteorologists, scientists, and
environmentalists dissenting from the so-called consensus for
"manmade" global warming. (Pete Chagnon, OneNewsNow)
Despite
its problems, 2008 was a totally cool year - 2008 has been a very
frustrating year for everyone, but probably more so for disciples of
man-made global warming climate change theories. In fact,
Christopher Booker, writing for The Telegraph, went so far as to declare:
2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved. ( Michael
Laprarie, Wizbang)
From CO2 Science this week:
Editorial:
An
Eighteen-Hundred-Year Climate Record from China: What does it suggest
about the uniqueness of late 20th-century warmth?
Medieval
Warm Period Record of the Week:
Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data
published by 650
individual scientists from 380
separate research institutions in 40
different countries ... and counting! This issue's Medieval Warm
Period Record of the Week comes from Southern
California, USA. To access the entire Medieval Warm Period Project's
database, click here.
Subject Index Summary:
Animals
(Insects - Butterflies): Are the planet's butterflies being driven to
extinction by increases in the air's CO2 content and
temperature?
Plant Growth Data:
This week we add new results (blue background) of plant growth responses
to atmospheric CO2 enrichment obtained from
experiments described in the peer-reviewed scientific literature for: Garden
Bean, Kentucky
Bluegrass, Little
Bluestem, and Marine
Diatom.
Journal Reviews:
On the Stability
of the Planet's Permafrost: Is it greater or less than what climate
alarmists have long contended?
4000-Year
δ18O Histories of New Zealand's
North and South Islands: When do they indicate that the warmest
periods of the two records occurred?
The Last
Glacial Termination in Tropical Southeast Africa: What role did the
air's CO2 content play in the event?
Vector-Borne
Diseases and Global Change: How is the incidence of these diseases
impacted by concomitant increases in the air's CO2
content and temperature?
Soybean
Photosynthesis: Elevated CO2 vs. High Temperatures
and Ozone Concentrations: Can atmospheric CO2
enrichment protect the key plant process from the negative effects of the
two environmental stresses? (co2science.org)
Global
rivalries go green - Climate change will be a central part of
government agendas in 2009 - and a rich source of diplomatic squabbles,
too.
There are two schools of thought on how 2009 will play out. Know-it-alls
who have recently poured over Marxism for Dummies, believe the economic
downturn is bound to put the politics of climate change on the back
burner. But environmentalists are pinning their hopes on Barack Obama
enacting a Green New Deal, full of spending on renewable energy. In fact,
neither side is right. Climate change will be more prominent than ever in
2009, but state-backed green jobs will take second place to international
disputes about emissions.
Despite the endless talk from businesses and governments, enthusiasm for
cutting greenhouse gas emissions has always been tempered by a concern for
hard-headed economics. In Spain, energy developers have been installing
fake solar panels, so desperate have they become to benefit from
government incentives (1). In countries with plans for wind power, the
evaporation of project finance has raised the prospect of ‘homeless
turbines’ and a decline in turbine prices of 20 to 30 per cent in 2009
(2). And in Britain, emissions associated with government offices, though
decreasing, are behind target (3). (James Woudhuysen, sp!ked)
Keating:
An energy policy that is the stuff of nightmares - On energy,
there’s good news and bad news.
The good news, of course, has been the dramatic plunge in energy prices in
recent months. Let’s consider oil and gasoline.
In mid-July, the price of oil had topped $145 per barrel. By mid-December,
it had dropped to below $45, a decline of nearly 70 percent.
And since the cost of gasoline is tied to oil, the price at the pump has
plummeted as well. The average national price of gasoline stood at $4.11
in mid-July, and by mid-December, it had fallen to $1.66 – a drop of
about 60 percent.
This decline in energy prices is one of the few positives to be found for
the U.S. economy. It serves as a kind of tax cut for both consumers and
businesses.
But what about the bad news?
Well, it must be recognized that the main reason for the decline in energy
prices is that the United States and many other nations are in recession.
A decline in economic activity means a decline in the demand for oil, and
prices fall.
Unfortunately, no part of this energy price decline can be traced to smart
policy steps. Nor can it be linked to anything that the incoming Obama
administration is signaling on the future of energy policy.
Instead, based on President-elect Barack Obama’s energy proposals and
the individuals appointed to lead his energy team, future energy policy
seems purposefully focused on driving up costs. (Raymond Keating, Long
Island Business News)
Wind Power Suffers
Another Setback in UK - The Cooler Heads Digest has already reported
how the United Kingdom’s huge gamble on wind power will raise
electricity prices and undermine reliability (here and here).
Unfortunately for energy consumers in that country, it looks like it’s
going to take a lot more windmills than the government thought. Experts
had calculated that 50,000 wind turbines would be needed to generate 15%
of Britain's electricity, to help the government to meet the EU target for
a 20% reduction of CO2 emissions by 2020. But the Sunday Telegraph reports
that it will take 100,000 turbines to meet the country’s climate goals,
because wind power lobbyists in the UK grossly overestimated the benefits
of wind power. The British Wind Energy Association had previously
estimated that electricity from wind turbines ‘displaces’ 860 grams of
carbon dioxide emissions for every kilowatt hour of electricity generated.
Now it has revised that figure to 430 grams following discussions with the
Advertising Standards Authority. (Cooler Heads Digest)
What’s
wrong with this picture? - National Health Services administrators
have decided to order a massive 40 percent increase in bariatric surgeries
for fat people in Yorkshire, the Yorkshire Post reported today. Government
efforts to prevent obesity have had little impact, said the paper, leading
to increasing calls for bariatric surgery.
While it is widely reported that some 71 percent of men in Yorkshire were
overweight or obese in 2007 and 62 percent of women, wrote health
correspondent Mike Waites, in actuality, the “levels of morbid obesity
are below the national average with only one percent of men assessed as
'grossly overweight' and less than one percent of women.”
As he reported, the number of bariatric surgeries in England has risen
ten-fold since 2001, when only 300 operations were performed. He went on
to report, however, that the government health services has never
evaluated the effectiveness of the surgery, including how much weight
patients usually lose. The NHS hopes to set up standards that will enable
such evaluations “to be carried out for the first time.” What other
elective surgery receives government funding, let alone is mandated, with
no evidence that it is safe and effective, and improves health? (Junkfood
Science)
Sunday
morning papers — an exercise in critical reading - At first glance,
readers may have thought that a government program had been shown to
prevent childhood obesity. Today’s newspaper headline read: “Scheme to
prevent child obesity hailed a success.” (Junkfood Science)
“Fat
is catching” theory exposed - The social networking theory of
obesity was skillfully debunked in this month’s issue of the British
Medical Journal.
This theory first made the news last year with the release of a paper by
Nicholas A. Christakis, M.D., Ph.D., MPH, a medical sociologist from
Harvard Medical School, and James H. Fowler, Ph.D., political scientist
from the University of California, San Diego. Their study was reported to
have shown that you can “catch” obesity from having fat friends and
that obesity is so contagious, it can be spread long-distance by email and
instant messaging. Even healthcare professionals, who didn’t understand
the etiology of true obesity or how statistics can be misused, failed to
detect the implausibility of “second-hand obesity.” In fact, some
doctors became so enamored with the new “science of networking” they
believed it should be a new medical specialty: network medicine.
It’s been long understood that fears, beliefs and ideologies spread
among people and social contacts. That’s the core to sales and
marketing. There’s no need for a special theory to explain that! And, of
course, communicable diseases can spread through contacts. But the notion
that you can “catch” a physical trait — like chin dimples or obesity
— or a health condition, like diabetes or cancer, from the people you
associate with is implausible. (Junkfood Science)
Peanutty
thoughts for today - The peanut. It’s a microcosm for many of
today’s fears that sweep up parents and children and leave them so
anxious that no amount of precautions are enough to help them feel safe.
An article in the current issue of the British Medical Journal suggested
that efforts to protect children with peanut allergies have become a cycle
of escalating reactions, unsupported by the science, and are making fears
worse. The author’s rather confrontational approach understandably
received a lot of negative and emotional responses from concerned parents.
But they also, sadly, illustrated the very fears he was trying to help put
into perspective. The responses to his article also showed how many
misconceptions about peanut allergies are widely believed. (Junkfood
Science)
Suffer
the little children - Medical and human rights organizations talk
about the need to safeguard children and help ensure all children are
vaccinated against the most crippling of preventable childhood diseases,
but we rarely hear about efforts to dispel anti-vaccination myths by
groups beyond our borders. Most of us would probably find it inconceivable
that anti-vaccination junkscience, especially targeting innocent children,
would be used for political purposes to spread hate.
Well-to-do parents in upscale regions of the United State may have more of
a luxury to follow specious anti-vaccination myths because the costs
aren’t nearly as deadly as they are for parents in some regions of the
world. Millions of parents struggle every day against disease, poverty and
lack of basic educational opportunities for their children. These same
areas have rising rates and re-emergences of childhood diseases that have
been mostly eradicated here. Like polio. Yet, these are the very same
areas where anti-vaccine propaganda has been the most intense. (Junkfood
Science)
Father
of Modern Medicine - Today is the 186th birthday of the father of
modern medicine. Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) is widely considered one of the
greatest benefactors of humanity. His diligent research led to some of the
greatest discoveries in the causes and prevention of contagious diseases
that have saved millions of lives. His life’s work gave birth to many
branches of biological science — microbiology, bacteriology, immunology,
stereochemistry, virology and molecular biology.
He was single-handedly responsible for some of the most important
scientific concepts and practical applications of science. The single,
most important contribution to medical science and modern medical practice
was the germ theory. It led to the first vaccine for rabies and
development of immunizations, aseptic surgical procedures, safe
fermentation and food handling, and pasteurization. (Junkfood Science)
A
life-saving business - It can be easy to forget that healthcare is big
business and can be as much about financial and political interests as it
is the practice of sound medicine. This is especially the case with Public
Health. A group of doctors and scientists concerned about the failure of
the government Department of Health to adhere to evidence-based medicine,
and believing patients benefit from the best treatments available, got
together and asked for support from health executives across the
country… (Junkfood Science)
Healing
touch that doesn’t heal or touch - An article taking a critical look
at the rise of alternative modalities in our healthcare system appeared in
the Arts & Entertainment section of the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps
its placement is why many healthcare professionals and health policy
analysts may have missed it. (Junkfood Science)
It’s
a winter wonderland! - As most of the country is blanketed in snow for
the holidays, a scientist has looked at the beauty in every snowflake.
This is a microscopic winter wonderland that few have ever seen before
now.
Dr. Kenneth Libbrecht, chairman of the Physics Department at CalTech
University in Pasadena, California, uses a specially-designed snowflake
photomicroscope to photograph snowflakes. These incredible snowflake
photos are at Dr. Libbrecht’s Snow Crystal Photo Gallery. (Junkfood
Science)
Living
longer with resveratrol — a different perspective - Has the secret
of the Fountain of Youth been discovered? Is it really possible to reset
our biological clocks and protect ourselves from the aging process? Can a
miracle pill cure all the major killers of aging, including diabetes,
heart disease and Alzheimer’s, and add 30 healthy years to our life?
(Junkfood Science)