Communities prepare to battle radium standard; Federal drinking water rule could force many in state to spend millions
By Colleen Krantz
Copyright 1999 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 
January 5, 1999
Officials here and in more than 20 other Wisconsin communities are bracing 
themselves for bad news and in some cases a knock-down, drag-out brawl over 
federal standards for the amount of radium allowable in drinking wat er.  
Federal officials plan to 
announce recommended standards in April, setting up a showdown with the 
communities that would have to spend tens of millions of dollars to comply with 
radium levels they view as unduly stringent. Many municipal officials believe 
tougher standards or stricter enforcement of current standards are unnecessary 
because, they say, the health 
risk posed 
by radium in water is negligible.  
Waukesha, in particular, is prepared to wage war with the federal Environmental 
Protection Agency over the standards, which could cost the city $70 million in 
water system improvements.  
Other communities also could take big financial hits. Fond du Lac, for example, 
estimates water system improvements there could cost $9 million.  
Waukesha hopes that its recently commissioned study on the health 
risks associated with radium will be completed before the EPA completes its 
rule-making 
process. Federal health officials have said long-term exposure to high levels 
of radium, a natural element in deep underground aquifers, has been linked to 
bone and other 
cancers.  
"Our hope would be that it's done just in time" to be considered by the EPA, said Daniel Warren, president of the 
Water Utili ty Commission.  
The $200,000 study, which will be conducted by the Medical College of 
Wisconsin, will examine whether there is a relationship between radium in city 
water and the occurrence of bone 
cancer in customers. It will be conducted ov er the next 18 months and paid 
for with funds from the water utility's budget.  
Bob Baumeister, chief of the Department of Natural Resources' Public Water 
Systems section, said 25 water systems in the state are in violation of the 
current rad ium standards.  
The standard has been on the books for years but has never been fully 
enforced.  
Most of the affected systems are within a band that curves from De Pere to Fond 
du Lac to Racine County. The systems generally draw fro m deep wells that tap 
into layers of sandstone for their water. Because all rocks contain radium, the 
element is absorbed by the water as 
it seeps through the rock layers.  
The City of Waukesha has been the most vocal in expressing concerns about the 
radium limits, in large part because it would have to pay the most to comply 
with federal standards.  
Within two years, the EPA intends to more strictly enforce its current standard 
or set 
a more stringent standard on the amount of radium allowable in drinking water, 
said Miguel Del Toral, manager of safe drinking water regulation for the EPA's 
regional office in Chicago.  
The current EPA limit is 5 picocuries of radium per liter of water. The 
EPA will likely suggest in April that the total remain at 5 picocuries but that 
separate limits be set for each of two isotopes of radium, Del Toral said. A 
maximum level of 3 picocuries for one isotope and 2 for the other would keep 
the 
total allowable at 5 picocuries, he said.  
A picocurie is a measure of radioactivity, or the pace at which a radioactive 
element such as radium disintegrates.  
If the standard is eventually reinforced, the state would try to gain 
compliance from Waukesha, where water avera ges about 9.7 picocuries of radium 
per liter, 
Del Toral said. About 175 other municipal water systems in the Midwest would be 
affected if the standard were enforced, Del Toral said.  
"Once we come out with our notice in April, the states will be informing the 
water systems that they should start looking at treatment options," Del Toral 
said.  
The DNR's Baumeister said that Waukesha's concerns are understandable, 
considering the amount the city would have to spend to upgrade its water 
system.  
"I think the others are concerned but are merely waiting out the process," he said.  
Dale Paczkowski, manager of the water utility in Fond du Lac, said he is 
optimistic that the 
Waukesha study will be completed in t ime for the EPA to consider it. A 
favorable finding by that study could bolster the arguments of other 
communities against the standards, he said.  
A number of communities in Brown County exceeding the current standard plan to 
abandon their w 
ells and begin drawing water from Lake Michigan, partly because of radium 
contamination.  
In Jefferson County, Johnson Creek, which has slightly more radium than allowed 
under the current standard, may have to spend nearly $1 million to resol ve the 
problem, said Todd Hampton, director of public works.  
The 
Waukesha County communities of New Berlin, Brookfield, Sussex, the villages of 
Mukwonago and Eagle and water trusts for portions of Muskego also would be 
affected by any EPA eff ort to enforce the radium standard.  
Although the EPA expects to announce its recommendation in April, a standard 
likely won't be 
applied until at least late in 2000. In the interim, the agency will invite 
comments on the proposed standard and consider the information provided to 
them.  
To comply, Waukesha would have to spend about $70 million to build and operate 
a water softening and filtration facility that would remove radium ions from 
water supplied by the city's deep wells, said Warren, of the city's Water 
Utility Commission. City officials have estimated that water bills would at 
least triple if such a facility were built.  
Waukesha Water Utility officials said in the spring that they would not 
voluntarily comp ly with the standard. They 
argued that previous studies have shown that the 
risk of getting bone 
cancer from drinking Waukesha water is negligible.  
"That's why we feel so strongly about this," Warren said. 
"Because we don't believe that even if we are forced to spend upwards of $70 
million that we are going to accomplish anything.  
"If the information said that there was a meaningful health 
risk to our 
customers, we would have done something a long time ago. We would have acted to 
protect our customers." 
During the early 1990s, the EPA considered relaxing the radium standards, and 
communities thought the issue would go away. The EPA was prohibited from 
relaxing the standards, however, under the Safe Drinking Water Act amendments 
adopted by 
Congress in 1996.  
Waukesha has spent years in legal battles over radium, at a cost of about $1 
million in legal fees, Warren said.  
In 1991, the state departments of Justice and Natural Resources filed a lawsuit 
against Waukesha in 
an attempt to force the city to reduce radium in its drinking water. In 1995, 
when it appeared the EPA would raise its limits on radium, the city agreed to 
pay a $20,000 fine, ending that legal battle.  
GRAPHIC: Chart 
Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
 
Exceeding radium standards
Twenty-five Wisconsin water utilities may have to spend millions
to comply with a final federal standard on radium. The U.S.  Environm
ental
Protection Agency says it will begin enforcing 
a limit on radium in
drinking water of no more than 5 picocuries per liter. A picocurie is a
measure of radioactivity.
TEST RESULTS
PICOCURIES
WATERWORKS PER LITER
Allouez 8. 1
Ashwaubenon 5.8
Bellevue Sanitary Dist. 1 (Green Bay) 
21.3
De Pere 
8.3
Ledgeview Sanitary Dist. 2 (De Pere) 6
Hustisford 6.7
 Lomira 6.3
Fond du Lac 8.1
Mary Hill Park (Fond du Lac)
10.4
Princeton 8.5
Johnson Creek 6
 Coleman 5.9
Peshtigo 7.6
Southern Wisconsin Center (Un
ion Grove) 7
 Brookfield 6.5
Eagle 8.6
Mukwonago 11.2
New Berlin 6.2
Sussex 
7.2
 Edgewater Bluff Villas (Green Bay) 6.2
Security Acres addition (Franklin) 6.2
Country Estates Community Association
(Lyons) 7
Lake Lore water trust (Muskego) 
8. 5
Lake Meadows water trust (Muskego) 6.3 
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.