City slickers off target in pesticide report

By Michael Fumento
Copyright 1998 Idaho Statesman
December 15, 1998




Here's something you don't see everyday. A group of suit-wearing city slickers who rarely get closer to a farm than watching "Green Acres" reruns have produced a report telling farmers how to protect their children from pesticides. The ultimate in arrogance? Perhaps. Or is it just another thinly disguised salvo in the environmentalists' never-ending campaign against pesticides?

"Trouble on the Farm: Growing up with Pesticides in Agricultural Communities," recently released by the Natural Resources Defense Council, is the latest in a series of environmentalist "studies" aimed right at Americans' softest, most vulnerable spot - their children.

(Another was their infamous, discredited Alar report). This one claims children on or near farms are exposed - and often overexposed - to pesticides "from their parents' work clothes and skin, from indoor and outdoor air, from their mothers' milk, and from water, food and soil."

Much of what the NRDC says is true. For example: Kids exist. Farms exist. Pesticides exist. It's the, well, "finer" points on which the NRDC is wrong.

For example, "Pesticide use in the United States is increasing," it states.

No national statistics follow, merely that from the last few years of a single state. Could this be because agricultural pesticide use in the United States has dropped sharply from 843 million pounds in 1979 to 771 million pounds in 1995, the last year for which there are data?

How about chronic exposure?

Studies repeatedly show that overall farmers have less cancer and live longer than non-farmers.

The largest and most recent study to date, published this year in the Annals of Epidemiology, combined 37 studies and found yet again that farmers have lower overall rates of cancer.

Indeed, the only excess they found was that of the lip, apparently from sun exposure.

"I've got three, very, very healthy kids and it's sort of ludicrous to think they're all going to die because they were exposed to pesticides,"says Bill Spencer, who has spent his life raising lemons, tangelos and grapefruit in Yuma, Ariz.

"Farmers are trained in safe application of pesticides. I think there's probably no more family-oriented people in the world than farmers and they're not about to put their children at risk."

Further, he says, "I don't think the NRDC is aiming their material at farmers. I don't know any stupid farmers out there."

"Unfortunately, EPA's record in enforcing child protection requirements of the law has been poor," said Dr. Gina Solomon, the report's principal author.

This is exactly the kind of criticism the EPA loves, giving them an excuse to do what they already want: expand their bureaucracy by further tightening farm regulations and enforcement.

Ultimately the NRDC does not want safe use of pesticides; it wants no use.

This is the motivation for every pesticide attack it launches, and it's hardly surprising therefore that among the recommendations in this latest one is to "Encourage organic farming by instituting stringent national standards."

Knowing it can never get an outright ban on pesticides, the NRDC and similar environmental groups want to make their use so onerous that farmers will have to abandon them.

Then we'll all be forced to eat expensive, ugly, shriveled-looking organic produce and foreign competitors will have our farmers foreclosing at rates not seen since the dust bowl days.

Meanwhile, I'm waiting for some farm group to release a report telling urban dwellers how to keep their kids safe from drug pushers and gang influences.

Michael Fumento is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, where he specializes in science and health issues.

Comments on this posting?

Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk Bulletin Board.

Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.


Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake Solutions, Inc.
 1