Global warming lucency
By S. Fred Singer
Copyright 1998 Washington Times
October 15, 1998
 Undiluted hype about 
global warming and climate disasters is polluting the journals and airwaves; 
multimillion-dollar propaganda campaigns are underway by environmental 
activists, generously financed by compliant foundations and by government 
grants. The White House is putting pressure on civic and religious groups, and 
even 
on corporations, to join the apocalyptic chorus. It's time to review some 
facts that need to be more widely known:
 (1) The climate is never just 
"average." It changes all the time, from season to season, year to year, and over the 
millennia. And that includes not only temperature, but rain, 
snow, droughts, storms, and every conceivable feature of the weather. So watch 
out when you read about the 
"hottest year," 
"longest drought," or 
"biggest hurricane." There is bound to be a weather record of some sort, set at some time, 
somewhere in the world.
 (2) But are there long-term 
climate trends? Is it getting warmer or is it getting colder? The correct 
answer is: Yes. It all depends on the time scale you choose. The global 
climate has warmed over the last 100 years, but not appreciably over the last 
50 years. It is colder now than 
it was 1,000 years ago. And do you recall that the global climate cooled from 
1940 until about 1975, raising fears of an impending ice age? 
 (3) Are human activities influencing climate? Yes, of course. The rise of 
agriculture and the growth of cities have changed the local climate 
significantly. With increasing populations and rising industrial activity 
there have also been some worldwide changes: Temperature extremes have 
softened, the stratosphere is cooling, the frequency of hurricanes has been 
diminishing -all of these are thought to be human influences 
on the atmosphere. But this does not mean there will be a catastrophic or even 
a substantial warming of the climate in the next century.
 (4) But isn't there substantial climate warming already because of the 
increased burning of fossil fuels - oil, gas, and coal - that creates more 
carbon dioxide in the 
atmosphere? Well, carbon dioxide (CO2) levels are certainly rising, but the 
climate seems not to be warming, as many would expect. It did warm greatly 
between 1880 and 1940 long before CO2 increased significantly. But in the last 
two decades, since 1979, weather satellites and 
balloon-borne radio sondes agree that climate has not warmed - even though CO2 
levels rose.
 (5) And why hasn't climate warmed, when theory clearly expects this to happen? 
 The answer must be that even our best computer models of the atmosphere are 
incomplete and leave out important features. Only in the 
last few years have modelers started to include ocean currents, atmospheric 
aerosol particles and dust into climate models. Most now suspect that clouds 
are the main reason why models and observations do not agree.
 (6) What about global calamities, like the spread of tropical diseases and 
sea-level rise? 
Well, since the climate is not warming, there is no real reason for concern. 
Diseases are not just spread by mosquitoes, but nowadays mostly by human 
contacts - which have been increasing markedly with the tremendous rise in 
global transportation. Informed scientists predict that sea level will 
drop - not rise - if oceans warm; the evaporated moisture may simply turn to 
snow in the polar regions and increase the thickness of the Greenland and 
Antarctic ice caps.
 (7) So, would a 
global warming be good or bad? Probably both; but overall, warming is definitely better than 
cooling. 
It is certainly better for agriculture and therefore for basic human existence. 
 All historical evidence shows that during the warm periods of the Middle Ages 
(around 1100 AD) people were better off than during the hard times of the 
"Little Ice Age" (1450-1850) when crops failed and people 
starved.
 (8) When it comes to it, what can we do about climate warming? We can do 
little about the climate itself, but we could try to stop the increase of 
atmospheric CO2. Even that task is daunting; it requires that we cut emissions 
- worldwide - by between 60 percent and 80 percent. In 
effect, this means cutting energy consumption by comparable amounts - including 
all transportation, heating, air conditioning, and electricity use. It would 
have an enormous negative impact on people's welfare - particularly for the 
poor and those in developing countries.
 (9) How would one reduce energy 
consumption by between 60 percent and 80 percent? There are basically two 
ways, short of drastically reducing population itself: energy rationing or 
energy taxes. Rationing means a political allocation, with governments and 
bureaucrats deciding who may use energy and who may not. Energy 
taxes are almost as unpalatable; just try to picture $5-per-gallon gasoline. 
Those who promote the Kyoto Protocol, signed in 1997, argue it can all be done 
by conservation - at little or no cost; but that's just not credible.
 (10) Should we ruin our economies and 
cause tremendous hardship for people to counter a phantom threat? That's a 
leading question; climate warming does indeed seem far away and a minor problem 
at that. There is a sure threat to human existence, however, and that is the 
near-certainty of a coming ice age. Geologists tell 
us the present interglacial warm period will soon come to an end. Perhaps 
greenhouse warming can save us from a frozen future.
 Will scientific facts turn off the hype? Don't bet on it. Not until the 
public becomes fully aware of the 
tremendous costs imposed by the policies now being developed to meet a 
non-existing problem.
 S. Fred Singer is president of the Science 
& Environmental Policy Project in Fairfax and professor emeritus of 
environmental sciences at the University of Virginia. He was the first 
director of the U.S. Weather Satellite 
Service. 
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.